On the evolution of the tRNA-dependent amidotransferases, GatCAB and GatDE

Glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase and asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase evolved from glutamyl-tRNA synthetase and aspartyl-tRNA synthetase, respectively, after the split in the last universal communal ancestor (LUCA). Glutaminyl-tRNA^Gln and asparaginyl-tRNA^Asn were likely formed in LUCA by amidation of the mischarged species, glutamyl-tRNA^Gln and aspartyl-tRNA^Asn, by tRNA-dependent amidotransferases, as is still the case in most bacteria and all known archaea. The amidotransferase GatCAB is found in both domains of life, while the heterodimeric amidotransferase GatDE is found only in Archaea. The GatB and GatE subunits belong to a unique protein family that includes Pet112 that is encoded in the nuclear genomes of numerous eukaryotes. GatE was thought to have evolved from GatB after the emergence of the modern lines of decent. Our phylogenetic analysis though places the split between GatE and GatB, prior to the phylogenetic divide between Bacteria and Archaea, and Pet112 to be of mitochondrial origin. In addition, GatD appears to have emerged prior to the bacterial-archaeal phylogenetic divide. Thus, while GatDE is an archaeal signature protein, it likely was present in LUCA together with GatCAB. Archaea retained both amidotransferases, while Bacteria emerged with only GatCAB. The presence of GatDE has favored a unique archaeal tRNA^Gln that may be preventing the acquisition of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase in Archaea. Archaeal GatCAB, on the other hand, has not favored a distinct tRNA^Asn, suggesting that tRNA^Asn recognition is not a major barrier to the retention of asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase in many Archaea.     

Co-evolution of the archaeal tRNA-dependent amidotransferase GatCAB with tRNA(Asn)

The important identity elements in tRNA(Gln) and tRNA(Asn) for bacterial GatCAB and in tRNA(Gln) for archaeal GatDE are the D-loop and the first base pair of the acceptor stem. Here we show that Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus GatCAB, the archaeal enzyme, is different as it discriminates Asp-tRNA(Asp) and Asp-tRNA(Asn) by use of U49, the D-loop and to a lesser extent the variable loop. Since archaea possess the tRNA(Gln)-specific amidotransferase GatDE, the archaeal GatCAB enzyme evolved to recognize different elements in tRNA(Asn) than those recognized by GatDE or by the bacterial GatCAB enzyme in their tRNA substrates.     

Insights into tRNA-Dependent Amidotransferase Evolution and Catalysis from the Structure of the Aquifex aeolicus Enzyme

Many bacteria form Gln-tRNA^Gln and Asn-tRNA^Asn by conversion of the misacylated Glu-tRNA^Gln and Asp-tRNA^Asn species catalyzed by the GatCAB amidotransferase in the presence of ATP and an amide donor (glutamine or asparagine). Here, we report the crystal structures of GatCAB from the hyperthermophilic bacterium Aquifex aeolicus, complexed with glutamine, asparagine, aspartate, ADP, or ATP. In contrast to the Staphylococcus aureus GatCAB, the A. aeolicus enzyme formed acyl-enzyme intermediates with either glutamine or asparagine, in line with the equally facile use by the amidotransferase of these amino acids as amide donors in the transamidation reaction.A water-filled ammonia channel is open throughout the length of the A. aeolicus GatCAB from the GatA active site to the synthetase catalytic pocket in the B-subunit. A non-catalytic Zn²⁺ site in the A. aeolicus GatB stabilizes subunit contacts and the ammonia channel. Judged from sequence conservation in the known GatCAB sequences, the Zn²⁺ binding motif was likely present in the primordial GatB/E, but became lost in certain lineages (e.g., S. aureus GatB). Two divalent metal binding sites, one permanent and the other transient, are present in the catalytic pocket of the A. aeolicus GatB. The two sites enable GatCAB to first phosphorylate the misacylated tRNA substrate and then amidate the activated intermediate to form the cognate products, Gln-tRNA^Gln or Asn-tRNA^Asn.     

Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus tRNA Gln confines the amidotransferase GatCAB to asparaginyl-tRNA Asn formation

Many prokaryotes form the amide aminoacyl-tRNAs glutaminyl-tRNA and asparaginyl-tRNA by tRNA-dependent amidation of the mischarged tRNA species, glutamyl-tRNA^Gln or aspartyl-tRNA^Asn. Archaea employ two such amidotransferases, GatCAB and GatDE, while bacteria possess only one, GatCAB. The Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus GatDE is slightly more efficient using Asn as an amide donor than Gln (k_cat/K_M of 5.4 s⁻¹/mM and 1.2 s⁻¹/mM, respectively). Unlike the bacterial GatCAB enzymes studied to date, the M. thermautotrophicus GatCAB uses Asn almost as well as Gln as an amide donor (k_cat/K_M of 5.7 s⁻¹/mM and 16.7 s⁻¹/mM, respectively). In contrast to the initial characterization of the M. thermautotrophicus GatCAB as being able to form Asn-tRNA^Asn and Gln-tRNA^Gln, our data demonstrate that while the enzyme is able to transamidate Asp-tRNA^Asn (k_cat/K_M of 125 s⁻¹/mM) it is unable to transamidate M. thermautotrophicus Glu-tRNA^Gln. However, M. thermautotrophicus GatCAB is capable of transamidating Glu-tRNA^Gln from H. pylori or B. subtilis, and M. thermautotrophicus Glu-tRNA^Asn. Thus, M. thermautotrophicus encodes two amidotransferases, each with its own activity, GatDE for Gln-tRNA and GatCAB for Asn-tRNA synthesis.     

The archaeal transamidosome for RNA-dependent glutamine biosynthesis

Archaea make glutaminyl-tRNA (Gln-tRNA^Gln) in a two-step process; a non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (ND-GluRS) forms Glu-tRNA^Gln, while the heterodimeric amidotransferase GatDE converts this mischarged tRNA to Gln-tRNA^Gln. Many prokaryotes synthesize asparaginyl-tRNA (Asn-tRNA^Asn) in a similar manner using a non-discriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (ND-AspRS) and the heterotrimeric amidotransferase GatCAB. The transamidosome, a complex of tRNA synthetase, amidotransferase and tRNA, was first described for the latter system in Thermus thermophilus [Bailly, M., Blaise, M., Lorber, B., Becker, H.D. and Kern, D. (2007) The transamidosome: a dynamic ribonucleoprotein particle dedicated to prokaryotic tRNA-dependent asparagine biosynthesis. Mol. Cell, 28, 228–239.]. Here, we show a similar complex for Gln-tRNA^Gln formation in Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus that allows the mischarged Glu-tRNA^Gln made by the tRNA synthetase to be channeled to the amidotransferase. The association of archaeal ND-GluRS with GatDE (K_D = 100 ± 22 nM) sequesters the tRNA synthetase for Gln-tRNA^Gln formation, with GatDE reducing the affinity of ND-GluRS for tRNA^Glu by at least 13-fold. Unlike the T. thermophilus transamidosome, the archaeal complex does not require tRNA for its formation, is not stable through product (Gln-tRNA^Gln) formation, and has no major effect on the kinetics of tRNA^Gln glutamylation nor transamidation. The differences between the two transamidosomes may be a consequence of the fact that ND-GluRS is a class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase, while ND-AspRS belongs to the class II family.     

Structural elements defining elongation factor Tu mediated suppression of codon ambiguity

In most prokaryotes Asn-tRNA^Asn and Gln-tRNA^Gln are formed by amidation of aspartate and glutamate mischarged onto tRNA^Asn and tRNA^Gln, respectively. Coexistence in the organism of mischarged Asp-tRNA^Asn and Glu-tRNA^Gln and the homologous Asn-tRNA^Asn and Gln-tRNA^Gln does not, however, lead to erroneous incorporation of Asp and Glu into proteins, since EF-Tu discriminates the misacylated tRNAs from the correctly charged ones. This property contrasts with the canonical function of EF-Tu, which is to non-specifically bind the homologous aa-tRNAs, as well as heterologous species formed in vitro by aminoacylation of non-cognate tRNAs. In Thermus thermophilus that forms the Asp-tRNA^Asn intermediate by the indirect pathway of tRNA asparaginylation, EF-Tu must discriminate the mischarged aminoacyl-tRNAs (aa-tRNA). We show that two base pairs in the tRNA T-arm and a single residue in the amino acid binding pocket of EF-Tu promote discrimination of Asp-tRNA^Asn from Asn-tRNA^Asn and Asp-tRNA^Asp by the protein. Our analysis suggests that these structural elements might also contribute to rejection of other mischarged aa-tRNAs formed in vivo that are not involved in peptide elongation. Additionally, these structural features might be involved in maintaining a delicate balance of weak and strong binding affinities between EF-Tu and the amino acid and tRNA moieties of other elongator aa-tRNAs.     

Cyclic peptides identified by phage display are competitive inhibitors of the tRNA-dependent amidotransferase of Helicobacter pylori

In Helicobacter pylori, the heterotrimeric tRNA-dependent amidotransferase (GatCAB) is essential for protein biosynthesis because it catalyzes the conversion of misacylated Glu-tRNA^Gln and Asp-tRNA^Asn into Gln-tRNA^Gln and Asn-tRNA^Asn, respectively. In this study, we used a phage library to identify peptide inhibitors of GatCAB. A library displaying loop-constrained heptapeptides was used to screen for phages binding to the purified GatCAB. To optimize the probability of obtaining competitive inhibitors of GatCAB with respect to its substrate Glu-tRNA^Gln, we used that purified substrate in the biopanning process of the phage-display technique to elute phages bound to GatCAB at the third round of the biopanning process. Among the eluted phages, we identified several that encode cyclic peptides rich in Trp and Pro that inhibit H. pylori GatCAB in vitro. Peptides P10 and P9 were shown to be competitive inhibitors of GatCAB with respect to its substrate Glu-tRNA^Gln, with K_i values of 126 and 392 μM, respectively. The docking models revealed that the Trp residues of these peptides form π-π stacking interactions with Tyr81 of the synthetase active site, as does the 3′-terminal A76 of tRNA, supporting their competitive behavior with respect to Glu-tRNA^Gln in the transamidation reaction. These peptides can be used as scaffolds in the search for novel antibiotics against the pathogenic bacteria that require GatCAB for Gln-tRNA^Gln and/or Asn-tRNA^Asn formation.     

A single tRNA base pair mediates bacterial tRNA-dependent biosynthesis of asparagine

In many prokaryotes and in organelles asparagine and glutamine are formed by a tRNA-dependent amidotransferase (AdT) that catalyzes amidation of aspartate and glutamate, respectively, mischarged on tRNA^Asn and tRNA^Gln. These pathways supply the deficiency of the organism in asparaginyl- and glutaminyl-tRNA synthtetases and provide the translational machinery with Asn-tRNA^Asn and Gln-tRNA^Gln. So far, nothing is known about the structural elements that confer to tRNA the role of a specific cofactor in the formation of the cognate amino acid. We show herein, using aspartylated tRNA^Asn and tRNA^Asp variants, that amidation of Asp acylating tRNA^Asn is promoted by the base pair U₁–A₇₂ whereas the G₁–C₇₂ pair and presence of the supernumerary nucleotide U_20A in the D-loop of tRNA^Asp prevent amidation. We predict, based on comparison of tRNA^Gln and tRNA^Glu sequence alignments from bacteria using the AdT-dependent pathway to form Gln-tRNA^Gln, that the same combination of nucleotides also rules specific tRNA-dependent formation of Gln. In contrast, we show that the tRNA-dependent conversion of Asp into Asn by archaeal AdT is mainly mediated by nucleotides G₄₆ and U₄₇ of the variable region. In the light of these results we propose that bacterial and archaeal AdTs use kingdom-specific signals to catalyze the tRNA-dependent formations of Asn and Gln.     

Structural conservation of an ancient tRNA sensor in eukaryotic glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase

In all organisms, aminoacyl tRNA synthetases covalently attach amino acids to their cognate tRNAs. Many eukaryotic tRNA synthetases have acquired appended domains, whose origin, structure and function are poorly understood. The N-terminal appended domain (NTD) of glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) is intriguing since GlnRS is primarily a eukaryotic enzyme, whereas in other kingdoms Gln-tRNA^Gln is primarily synthesized by first forming Glu-tRNA^Gln, followed by conversion to Gln-tRNA^Gln by a tRNA-dependent amidotransferase. We report a functional and structural analysis of the NTD of Saccharomyces cerevisiae GlnRS, Gln4. Yeast mutants lacking the NTD exhibit growth defects, and Gln4 lacking the NTD has reduced complementarity for tRNA^Gln and glutamine. The 187-amino acid Gln4 NTD, crystallized and solved at 2.3 Å resolution, consists of two subdomains, each exhibiting an extraordinary structural resemblance to adjacent tRNA specificity-determining domains in the GatB subunit of the GatCAB amidotransferase, which forms Gln-tRNA^Gln. These subdomains are connected by an apparent hinge comprised of conserved residues. Mutation of these amino acids produces Gln4 variants with reduced affinity for tRNA^Gln, consistent with a hinge-closing mechanism proposed for GatB recognition of tRNA. Our results suggest a possible origin and function of the NTD that would link the phylogenetically diverse mechanisms of Gln-tRNA^Gln synthesis.     

Two-step aminoacylation of tRNA without channeling in Archaea

Catalysis of sequential reactions is often envisaged to occur by channeling of substrate between enzyme active sites without release into bulk solvent. However, while there are compelling physiological rationales for direct substrate transfer, proper experimental support for the hypothesis is often lacking, particularly for metabolic pathways involving RNA. Here, we apply transient kinetics approaches developed to study channeling in bienzyme complexes to an archaeal protein synthesis pathway featuring the misaminoacylated tRNA intermediate Glu-tRNA^Gln. Experimental and computational elucidation of a kinetic and thermodynamic framework for two-step cognate Gln-tRNA^Gln synthesis demonstrates that the misacylating aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase (GluRS^ND) and the tRNA-dependent amidotransferase (GatDE) function sequentially without channeling. Instead, rapid processing of the misacylated tRNA intermediate by GatDE and preferential elongation factor binding to the cognate Gln-tRNA^Gln together permit accurate protein synthesis without formation of a binary protein-protein complex between GluRS^ND and GatDE. These findings establish an alternate paradigm for protein quality control via two-step pathways for cognate aminoacyl-tRNA formation.     

Anticodon-binding domain swapping in a nondiscriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase reveals contributions to tRNA specificity and catalytic activity

The nondiscriminating aspartyl-tRNA synthetase (ND-AspRS), found in many archaea and bacteria, covalently attaches aspartic acid to tRNA^Asp and tRNA^Asn generating a correctly charged Asp-tRNA^Asp and an erroneous Asp-tRNA^Asn. This relaxed tRNA specificity is governed by interactions between the tRNA and the enzyme. In an effort to assess the contributions of the anticodon-binding domain to tRNA specificity, we constructed two chimeric enzymes, Chimera-D and Chimera-N, by replacing the native anticodon-binding domain in the Helicobacter pylori ND-AspRS with that of a discriminating AspRS (Chimera-D) and an asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase (AsnRS, Chimera-N), both from Escherichia coli. Both chimeric enzymes showed similar secondary structure compared to wild-type (WT) ND-AspRS and maintained the ability to form dimeric complexes in solution. Although less catalytically active than WT, Chimera-D was more discriminating as it aspartylated tRNA^Asp over tRNA^Asn with a specificity ratio of 7.0 compared to 2.9 for the WT enzyme. In contrast, Chimera-N exhibited low catalytic activity toward tRNA^Asp and was unable to aspartylate tRNA^Asn. The observed catalytic activities for the two chimeras correlate with their heterologous toxicity when expressed in E. coli. Molecular dynamics simulations show a reduced hydrogen bond network at the interface between the anticodon-binding domain and the catalytic domain in Chimera-N compared to Chimera-D or WT, explaining its lower stability and catalytic activity.     

Structural basis for recognition of cognate tRNA by tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase from three kingdoms

The specific aminoacylation of tRNA by tyrosyl-tRNA synthetases (TyrRSs) relies on the identity determinants in the cognate tRNA^Tyrs. We have determined the crystal structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae TyrRS (SceTyrRS) complexed with a Tyr-AMP analog and the native tRNA^Tyr(GΨA). Structural information for TyrRS–tRNA^Tyr complexes is now full-line for three kingdoms. Because the archaeal/eukaryotic TyrRSs–tRNA^Tyrs pairs do not cross-react with their bacterial counterparts, the recognition modes of the identity determinants by the archaeal/eukaryotic TyrRSs were expected to be similar to each other but different from that by the bacterial TyrRSs. Interestingly, however, the tRNA^Tyr recognition modes of SceTyrRS have both similarities and differences compared with those in the archaeal TyrRS: the recognition of the C1-G72 base pair by SceTyrRS is similar to that by the archaeal TyrRS, whereas the recognition of the A73 by SceTyrRS is different from that by the archaeal TyrRS but similar to that by the bacterial TyrRS. Thus, the lack of cross-reactivity between archaeal/eukaryotic and bacterial TyrRS-tRNA^Tyr pairs most probably lies in the different sequence of the last base pair of the acceptor stem (C1-G72 vs G1-C72) of tRNA^Tyr. On the other hand, the recognition mode of Tyr-AMP is conserved among the TyrRSs from the three kingdoms.     

Deinococcus glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase is a chimer between proteins from an ancient and the modern pathways of aminoacyl-tRNA formation

Glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase from Deinococcus radiodurans possesses a C-terminal extension of 215 residues appending the anticodon-binding domain. This domain constitutes a paralog of the Yqey protein present in various organisms and part of it is present in the C-terminal end of the GatB subunit of GatCAB, a partner of the indirect pathway of Gln-tRNA^Gln formation. To analyze the peculiarities of the structure–function relationship of this GlnRS related to the Yqey domain, a structure of the protein was solved from crystals diffracting at 2.3Å and a docking model of the synthetase complexed to tRNA^Gln constructed. The comparison of the modeled complex with the structure of the E. coli complex reveals that all residues of E. coli GlnRS contacting tRNA^Gln are conserved in D. radiodurans GlnRS, leaving the functional role of the Yqey domain puzzling. Kinetic investigations and tRNA-binding experiments of full length and Yqey-truncated GlnRSs reveal that the Yqey domain is involved in tRNA^Gln recognition. They demonstrate that Yqey plays the role of an affinity-enhancer of GlnRS for tRNA^Gln acting only in cis. However, the presence of Yqey in free state in organisms lacking GlnRS, suggests that this domain may exert additional cellular functions.     

Substrate discrimination in RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage: importance of the structural environment of the RNase P cleavage site

Like the translational elongation factor EF-Tu, RNase P interacts with a large number of substrates where RNase P with its RNA subunit generates tRNAs with matured 5′ termini by cleaving tRNA precursors immediately 5′ of the residue at +1, i.e. at the position that corresponds to the first residue in tRNA. Most tRNAs carry a G₊₁C₊₇₂ base pair at the end of the aminoacyl acceptor-stem whereas in tRNA^Gln G₊₁C₊₇₂ is replaced with U₊₁A₊₇₂. Here, we investigated RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage as a function of having G₊₁C₊₇₂ versus U₊₁A₊₇₂ in various substrate backgrounds, two full-size tRNA precursors (pre-tRNA^Gln and pre-tRNA^TyrSu3) and a model RNA hairpin substrate (pATSer). Our data showed that replacement of G₊₁C₊₇₂ with U₊₁A₊₇₂ influenced ground state binding, cleavage efficiency under multiple and single turnover conditions in a substrate-dependent manner. Interestingly, we observed differences both in ground state binding and rate of cleavage comparing two full-size tRNA precursors, pre-tRNA^Gln and pre-tRNA^TyrSu3. These findings provide evidence for substrate discrimination in RNase P RNA-mediated cleavage both at the level of binding, as previously observed for EF-Tu, as well as at the catalytic step. In our experiments where we used model substrate derivatives further indicated the importance of the +1/+72 base pair in substrate discrimination by RNase P RNA. Finally, we provide evidence that the structural architecture influences Mg²⁺ binding, most likely in its vicinity.     

Structure of an archaeal non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase: a missing link in the evolution of Gln-tRNAGln formation

The molecular basis of the genetic code relies on the specific ligation of amino acids to their cognate tRNA molecules. However, two pathways exist for the formation of Gln-tRNA^Gln. The evolutionarily older indirect route utilizes a non-discriminating glutamyl-tRNA synthetase (ND-GluRS) that can form both Glu-tRNA^Glu and Glu-tRNA^Gln. The Glu-tRNA^Gln is then converted to Gln-tRNA^Gln by an amidotransferase. Since the well-characterized bacterial ND-GluRS enzymes recognize tRNA^Glu and tRNA^Gln with an unrelated α-helical cage domain in contrast to the β-barrel anticodon-binding domain in archaeal and eukaryotic GluRSs, the mode of tRNA^Glu/tRNA^Gln discrimination in archaea and eukaryotes was unknown. Here, we present the crystal structure of the Methanothermobacter thermautotrophicus ND-GluRS, which is the evolutionary predecessor of both the glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase (GlnRS) and the eukaryotic discriminating GluRS. Comparison with the previously solved structure of the Escherichia coli GlnRS-tRNA^Gln complex reveals the structural determinants responsible for specific tRNA^Gln recognition by GlnRS compared to promiscuous recognition of both tRNAs by the ND-GluRS. The structure also shows the amino acid recognition pocket of GluRS is more variable than that found in GlnRS. Phylogenetic analysis is used to reconstruct the key events in the evolution from indirect to direct genetic encoding of glutamine.     

Adaptation to tRNA acceptor stem structure by flexible adjustment in the catalytic domain of class I tRNA synthetases

Class I aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) use a Rossmann-fold domain to catalyze the synthesis of aminoacyl-tRNAs required for decoding genetic information. While the Rossmann-fold domain is conserved in evolution, the acceptor stem near the aminoacylation site varies among tRNA substrates, raising the question of how the conserved protein fold adapts to RNA sequence variations. Of interest is the existence of an unpaired C-A mismatch at the 1-72 position unique to bacterial initiator tRNA(fMet) and absent from elongator tRNAs. Here we show that the class I methionyl-tRNA synthetase (MetRS) of Escherichia coli and its close structural homolog cysteinyl-tRNA synthetase (CysRS) display distinct patterns of recognition of the 1-72 base pair. While the structural homology of the two enzymes in the Rossmann-fold domain is manifested in a common burst feature of aminoacylation kinetics, CysRS discriminates against unpaired 1-72, whereas MetRS lacks such discrimination. A structure-based alignment of the Rossmann fold identifies the insertion of an α-helical motif, specific to CysRS but absent from MetRS, which docks on 1-72 and may discriminate against mismatches. Indeed, substitutions of the CysRS helical motif abolish the discrimination against unpaired 1-72. Additional structural alignments reveal that with the exception of MetRS, class I tRNA synthetases contain a structural motif that docks on 1-72. This work demonstrates that by flexible insertion of a structural motif to dock on 1-72, the catalytic domain of class I tRNA synthetases can acquire structural plasticity to adapt to changes at the end of the tRNA acceptor stem.     

A dual-specific Glu-tRNA and Asp-tRNA amidotransferase is involved in decoding glutamine and asparagine codons in Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans

The gatC, gatA and gatB genes encoding the three subunits of glutamyl-tRNA^Gln amidotransferase from Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans, an acidophilic bacterium used in bioleaching of minerals, have been cloned and expressed in Escherichia coli. As in Bacillus subtilis the three gat genes are organized in an operon-like structure in A. ferrooxidans. The heterologously overexpressed enzyme converts Glu-tRNA^Gln to Gln-tRNA^Gln and Asp-tRNA^Asn to Asn-tRNA^Asn. Biochemical analysis revealed that neither glutaminyl-tRNA synthetase nor asparaginyl-tRNA synthetase is present in A. ferrooxidans, but that glutamyl-tRNA synthetase and aspartyl-tRNA synthetase enzymes are present in the organism. These data suggest that the transamidation pathway is responsible for the formation of Gln-tRNA and Asn-tRNA in A. ferrooxidans.     

Solution structure of the apical stem-loop of the human hepatitis B virus encapsidation signal

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication is initiated by HBV RT binding to the highly conserved encapsidation signal, epsilon, at the 5′ end of the RNA pregenome. Epsilon contains an apical stem–loop, whose residues are either totally conserved or show rare non-disruptive mutations. Here we present the structure of the apical stem–loop based on NOE, RDC and ¹H chemical shift NMR data. The ¹H chemical shifts proved to be crucial to define the loop conformation. The loop sequence 5′-CUGUGC-3′ folds into a UGU triloop with a CG closing base pair and a bulged out C and hence forms a pseudo-triloop, a proposed protein recognition motif. In the UGU loop conformations most consistent with experimental data, the guanine nucleobase is located on the minor groove face and the two uracil bases on the major groove face. The underlying helix is disrupted by a conserved non-paired U bulge. This U bulge adopts multiple conformations, with the nucleobase being located either in the major groove or partially intercalated in the helix from the minor groove side, and bends the helical stem. The pseudo-triloop motif, together with the U bulge, may represent important anchor points for the initial recognition of epsilon by the viral RT.     

Studies of translational misreading in vivo show that the ribosome very efficiently discriminates against most potential errors

Protein synthesis must rapidly and repeatedly discriminate between a single correct and many incorrect aminoacyl-tRNAs. We have attempted to measure the frequencies of all possible missense errors by tRNA, tRNA and tRNA. The most frequent errors involve three types of mismatched nucleotide pairs, U•U, U•C, or U•G, all of which can form a noncanonical base pair with geometry similar to that of the canonical U•A or C•G Watson–Crick pairs. Our system is sensitive enough to measure errors at other potential mismatches that occur at frequencies as low as 1 in 500,000 codons. The ribosome appears to discriminate this efficiently against any pair with non-Watson–Crick geometry. This extreme accuracy may be necessary to allow discrimination against the errors involving near Watson–Crick pairing.