Drug discovery for malaria: a very challenging and timely endeavor

The prevalence of resistance to known antimalarial drugs has resulted in the expansion of antimalarial drug discovery efforts. Academic and nonprofit institutions are partnering with the pharmaceutical industry to develop new antimalarial drugs. Several new antimalarial agents are undergoing clinical trials, mainly those resurrected from previous antimalarial drug discovery programs. Novel antimalarials are being advanced through the drug development process, of course, with the anticipated high failure rate typical of drug discovery. Many of these are summarized in this review. Mechanisms for funding antimalarial drug discovery and genomic information to aid drug target selection have never been better. It remains to be seen whether ongoing efforts will be sufficient for reducing malaria burden in the developing world.     

Combined antimalarial therapy using artemisinin

The existing armamentarium of drugs for the treatment and prevention of malaria is limited primarily by resistance (and cross-resistance between closely related drugs). However, most of these drugs still have a place and their life-span could be prolonged if better deployed and used, and also by rationally combining them based on pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Newer compounds are also being developed. The nature of malaria disease and its prevalence in the developing world call for innovative approaches to develop new affordable drugs and to safeguard the available ones. According to WHO, the concept of combination therapy is based on the synergistic or additive potential of two or more drugs, to improve therapeutic efficacy and also delay the development of resistance to the individual components of the combination. Combination therapy (CT) with antimalarial drugs is the simultaneous use of two or more blood schizontocidal drugs with independent modes of action and different biochemical targets in the parasite. In the context of this definition, multiple-drug therapies that include a nonantimalarial drug to enhance the antimalarial effect of a blood schizontocidal drug are not considered combination therapy. Similarly, certain antimalarial drugs that fit the criteria of synergistic fixed-dose combinations are operationally considered as single products in that neither of the individual components would be given alone for anti-malarial therapy. An example is sulfadoxine-pyrimethamine. Artemisinin-based combination therapies have been shown to improve treatment efficacy and also contain drug resistance in South-East Asia. However, major challenges exist in the deployment and use of antimalarial drug combination therapies, particularly in Africa. These include: 1) the choice of drug combinations best suited for the different epidemiological situations; 2) the cost of combination therapy; 3) the timing of the introduction of combination therapy; 4) the operational obstacles to implementation, especially compliance. As a response to increasing levels of antimalarial resistance, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that all countries experiencing resistance to conventional monotherapies, such as chloroquine, amodiaquine or sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, should use combination therapies, preferably those containing artemisinin derivatives (ACTs--artemisinin-based combination therapies) for malaria caused by Plasmodium falciparum. There is a promising role of such compounds in replacing or complementing current options. Since 1979, several different formulations of artemisinin and its derivatives have been produced and studied in China in several thousand patients for either P. falciparum or P. vivax malaria. To date, there is no evidence of drug resistance to these compounds. The use of artemisinin, artemether, arteether and artesunate for either uncomplicated or severe malaria is now spreading through almost all malarious areas of the world, although some of they have no patent protection, their development (with few exceptions) has not followed yet full international standards. Both artesunate, artemether and arteether are rapidly and extensively converted to their common bioactive metabolite, dihydroarte-misinin. WHO currently recommends the following therapeutic options: 1) artemether/lumefantrine; 2) artesunate plus amodiaquine; 3) artesunate plus sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (in areas where SP efficacy remains high); 4) artesunate plus mefloquine (in areas with low to moderate transmission); and 5) amodiaquine plus sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine, in areas where efficacy of both amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine remains high (mainly limited to countries in West Africa). This non artemisinin-based combination therapy is reserved as an interim option for countries, which, for whatever reason, are unable immediately to move to ACTs.     

Delaying antimalarial drug resistance with combination chemotherapy

Resistance to antimalarial drugs arises when spontaneously occurring mutants with gene mutations or amplifications which confer reduced drug susceptibility are selected, and are then transmitted. Simultaneous use of two or more antimalarials with different modes of action and which therefore do not share the same resistance mechanisms will reduce the chance of selection, because the chance of a resistant mutant surviving is the product of the parasite mutation rates for the individual drugs, multiplied by the number of parasites in an infection that are exposed to the drugs. The artemisinin derivatives are very active antimalarials, which produce large reductions in parasite biomass per asexual cycle, and reduce malaria transmissibility. To date no resistance to these drugs has been reported. These drugs therefore make particularly effective combination partners. This suggests that antimalarial drugs should not be used alone in treatment, but always in combination, as in the treatment of tuberculosis or HIV, and that the combination should include artemisinin or one of its derivatives.     

Drug-resistant malaria: molecular mechanisms and implications for public health

Resistance to antimalarial drugs has often threatened malaria elimination efforts and historically has led to the short-term resurgence of malaria incidences and deaths. With concentrated malaria eradication efforts currently underway, monitoring drug resistance in clinical settings complemented by in vitro drug susceptibility assays and analysis of resistance markers, becomes critical to the implementation of an effective antimalarial drug policy. Understanding of the factors, which lead to the development and spread of drug resistance, is necessary to design optimal prevention and treatment strategies. This review attempts to summarize the unique factors presented by malarial parasites that lead to the emergence and spread of drug resistance, and gives an overview of known resistance mechanisms to currently used antimalarial drugs.     

Systematic Review: Insight into Antimalarial Peptide

Antimalarial peptides varying in size, sequence, charge, conformation and structure, hydrophobicity and amphipathicity reflect their heterogeneity in antimalarial activity. Due to global concern of antimalarial drug resistance, these peptides are seldom in attention for therapeutic values as this microbial and synthetic peptide are likely known for delaying the drug resistance phenomenon. Despite of this, among most of the peptides that have shown activity in cultured parasitized erythrocytes were failing to show its efficacy on in vivo models and few of them that are efficacious are not clinically significant on the host. A systematic literature search was carried out to obtain all related studies in PubMed, EMBASE and GOOGLE SCHOLAR from year 1989 to till date 2015 and we found only 63 studies that focus on antimalarial activity of different peptides originated from different sources under in vitro and in vivo conditions. Antimalarial peptides that are mostly included in this review is the naturally occurring along with their derivatives obtained from different sources ranging from lower prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes. Most of the antimalarial peptides had undergone only in vitro testing on Plasmodium falciparum strains having very less potency, but higher selectivity in comparison to standard drugs. The study included in this article will give future direction for development of more antimalarial peptide with desired efficacy and safety.     

A network to monitor antimalarial drug resistance: a plan for moving forward

The spread of resistance to antimalarial drugs has required changes in the recommended first-line treatment for falciparum malaria in almost all regions. Most drugs recommended currently are combinations of a long-acting antimalarial and an artemisinin derivative. This article presents the rationale for establishing a web-based, open-access database of antimalarial drug resistance and efficacy: the World Antimalarial Resistance Network (WARN). The goal of this network is to assemble the tools and information that will enable the malaria community to collate, analyze and share contemporary information on antimalarial-drug efficacy in all endemic regions so that decisions on antimalarial-drug use are based on solid evidence.     

Antimalarial activity of 6-(1,2,6,7-tetraoxaspiro[7.11]nonadec-4-yl)hexan-1-ol (N-251) and its carboxylic acid derivatives

Malaria is one of the world's deadliest diseases and is becoming an increasingly serious problem as malaria parasites develop resistance to most of the antimalarial drugs used today. We previously reported the in vitro and in vivo antimalarial potencies of 1,2,6,7-tetraoxaspiro[7.11]nonadecane (N-89) and 6-(1,2,6,7-tetraoxaspiro[7.11]nonadec-4-yl)hexan-1-ol (N-251) against Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium berghei parasites. To improve water-solubility for synthetic peroxides, a variety of cyclic peroxides having carboxyl functionality was prepared based on the antimalarial candidate, N-251, and their antimalarial activities were determined. The reactions of N-89 and its derivatives with Fe(II) demonstrated a highly efficient formation of the corresponding carbon radical which may be suspected as a key for the antiparasitic activity.     

Current opinion on an emergence of drug resistant strains of Plasmodium falciparum through genetic alterations

The human malarial parasite Plasmodium falciparum is one of the world''s most devastating pathogen. Its capability to regulate its genes under various stages of its life cycle as well as under unfavourable environmental conditions has led to the development of vaccine resistant strains. Similarly, under drug pressure it develops mutations in the target genes. These mutations confer mid and high-level resistance to the antimalarial drugs. Increasing a resistance of malaria parasites to conventional antimalarial drugs is an important factor contributing to the persistence of the disease as a major health threat. This article reviews current knowledge of stage specific malarial targets, antimalarial drugs and the mutations that have led to the emergence of resistant strains.     

Antimalarial activity of the anticancer and proteasome inhibitor bortezomib and its analog ZL<Subscript>3</Subscript>B

Background  

The high rate of mortality due to malaria and the worldwide distribution of parasite resistance to the commonly used antimalarial drugs chloroquine and pyrimethamine emphasize the urgent need for the development of new antimalarial drugs. An alternative approach to the long and uncertain process of designing and developing new compounds is to identify among the armamentarium of drugs already approved for clinical treatment of various human diseases those that may have strong antimalarial activity.     

Drug-resistant malaria

In the past 21 years, a modest increase in the range of antimalarial drugs approved for clinical use has been complemented by a more impressive expansion in the analysis and understanding of the molecular mechanisms underlying resistance to these agents. Such resistance is a major factor in the increasing difficulty in controlling malaria, and important developments during this period are recounted here.     

Investigation of some medicinal plants traditionally used for treatment of malaria in Kenya as potential sources of antimalarial drugs

Malaria is a major public health problem in many tropical and subtropical countries and the burden of this disease is getting worse, mainly due to the increasing resistance of Plasmodium falciparum against the widely available antimalarial drugs. There is an urgent need for discovery of new antimalarial agents. Herbal medicines for the treatment of various diseases including malaria are an important part of the cultural diversity and traditions of which Kenya′s biodiversity has been an integral part. Two major antimalarial drugs widely used today came originally from indigenous medical systems, that is quinine and artemisinin, from Peruvian and Chinese ancestral treatments, respectively. Thus ethnopharmacology is a very important resource in which new therapies may be discovered. The present review is an analysis of ethnopharmacological publications on antimalarial therapies from some Kenyan medicinal plants.     

Antimalarial dosing regimens and drug resistance

The contribution of underdosing to antimalarial treatment failure has been underappreciated. Most recommended dosage regimens are based on studies in non-pregnant adult patients. Young children and pregnant women, who bear the heaviest malaria burden, have the highest treatment failure rates. This has been attributed previously to lower immunity, although blood concentrations of many antimalarial drugs are significantly lower in pregnant women and young children than in non-pregnant adults. Nevertheless, there have been no studies of higher dosages. Sub-therapeutic concentrations will certainly contribute to poorer responses to treatment and will fuel the emergence and spread of antimalarial drug resistance. There is an urgent need for studies to optimise antimalarial dosage regimens in infants, young children and pregnant women, both to improve cure rates and to prolong the useful therapeutic lives of antimalarial drugs.     

Current perspectives on the mechanism of action of artemisinins

Artemisinin derivatives are the most recent single drugs approved and introduced for public antimalarial treatment. Although their recommended use is for treatment of Plasmodium falciparum infection, these drugs also act against other parasites, as well as against tumor cells. The mechanisms of action attributed to artemisinin include interference with parasite transport proteins, disruption of parasite mitochondrial function, modulation of host immune function and inhibition of angiogenesis. Artemisinin combination therapies are currently the preferred treatment for malaria. These combinations may prevent the induction of parasite drug resistance. However, in view of the multiple mechanisms involved, especially when additional drugs are used, the combined therapy should be carefully examined for antagonistic effects. It is now a general theory that the crucial mechanism is interference with plasmodial SERCA. Therefore, future development of resistance may be associated with overproduction or mutations of this transporter. However, a general mechanism, such as alterations in general drug transport pathways, is feasible. In this article, we review the evidence for each mechanism of action suggested.     

Efficacy of amodiaquine and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine in the treatment of malaria not complicated by Plasmodium falciparum in Nariño,Colombia, 1999-2002

The resurgence and spread of antimalarial drug resistance is one of the causes of the worldwide increase of malaria. In Colombia, uncomplicated Plasmodium falciparum malaria has been treated with a combination of amodiaquine (AQ) and sulfadoxine/pyrimethamine (SP) since 2000. The efficacy of these two antimalarials was evaluated after the implementation of the new malaria treatment scheme. In the municipalities of El Charco and Tumaco (Nari?o) on the Pacific Coast region, the standard PAHO protocol was used to evaluate antimalarial efficacy in areas of low to moderate malaria transmission. Patients were randomly allocated to treatment regime in two cities of Nari?o, El Charco (n = 48) and Tumaco (n = 50). After 14 days none of El Charco patients presented therapeutic failure to either antimalarial. However, in Tumaco after 28 days, 12 of 24 (95% CI: 30.6-69.4) patients presented AQ treatment failure while 4 of 26 (95% CI: 5.1-33.1) patients had SP treatment failure. The high level of AQ treatment failure in Tumaco was unexpected because it had been introduced only recently as an antimalarial treatment in Colombia. The results suggest that the use of the current dose of AQ in combination with SP will be therapeutically useful for less time than expected. Use of combined therapies is a key strategy to delay antimalarial resistance. Unfortunately, its success depends on the efficacy of antimalarial drugs individually.     

On the contribution of the rodent model Plasmodium chabaudi for understanding the genetics of drug resistance in malaria

Malaria is a devastating disease that still claims over half a million lives every year, mostly in sub–Saharan Africa. One of the main barriers to malaria control is the evolution and propagation of drug-resistant mutant parasites. Knowing the genes and respective mutations responsible for drug resistance facilitates the design of drugs with novel modes of action and allows predicting and monitoring drug resistance in natural parasite populations in real-time. The best way to identify these mutations is to experimentally evolve resistance to the drug in question and then comparing the genomes of the drug-resistant mutants to that of the sensitive progenitor parasites. This simple evolutive concept was the starting point for the development of a paradigm over the years, based on the use of the rodent malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi to unravel the genetics of drug resistance in malaria. It involves the use of a cloned parasite isolate (P. chabaudi AS) whose genome is well characterized, to artificially select resistance to given drugs through serial passages in mice under slowly increasing drug pressure. The end resulting parasites are cloned and the genetic mutations are then discovered through Linkage Group Selection, a technique conceived by Prof. Richard Carter and his group, and/or Whole Genome Sequencing. The precise role of these mutations can then be interrogated in malaria parasites of humans through allelic replacement experiments and/or genotype-phenotype association studies in natural parasite populations. Using this paradigm, all the mutations underlying resistance to the most important antimalarial drugs were identified, most of which were pioneering and later shown to also play a role in drug resistance in natural infections of human malaria parasites. This supports the use of P. chabaudi a fast-track predictive model to identify candidate genetic markers of resistance to present and future antimalarial drugs and improving our understanding of the biology of resistance.     

Antimalarial drug synergism and antagonism: mechanistic and clinical significance

Interactions between antimicrobial agents provide clues as to their mechanisms of action and influence the combinations chosen for therapy of infectious diseases. In the treatment of malaria, combinations of drugs, in many cases acting synergistically, are increasingly important in view of the frequency of resistance to single agents. The study of antimalarial drug interactions is therefore of great significance to both treatment and research. It is therefore worrying that the analysis of drug-interaction data is often inadequate, leading in some cases to dubious conclusions about synergism or antagonism. Furthermore, making mechanistic deductions from drug-interaction data is not straightforward and of the many reported instances of antimalarial synergism or antagonism, few have been fully explained biochemically. This review discusses recent findings on antimalarial drug interactions and some pitfalls in their analysis and interpretation. The conclusions are likely to have relevance to other antimicrobial agents.     

P. falciparum in vitro killing rates allow to discriminate between different antimalarial mode-of-action

Chemotherapy is still the cornerstone for malaria control. Developing drugs against Plasmodium parasites and monitoring their efficacy requires methods to accurately determine the parasite killing rate in response to treatment. Commonly used techniques essentially measure metabolic activity as a proxy for parasite viability. However, these approaches are susceptible to artefacts, as viability and metabolism are two parameters that are coupled during the parasite life cycle but can be differentially affected in response to drug actions. Moreover, traditional techniques do not allow to measure the speed-of-action of compounds on parasite viability, which is an essential efficacy determinant. We present here a comprehensive methodology to measure in vitro the direct effect of antimalarial compounds over the parasite viability, which is based on limiting serial dilution of treated parasites and re-growth monitoring. This methodology allows to precisely determine the killing rate of antimalarial compounds, which can be quantified by the parasite reduction ratio and parasite clearance time, which are key mode-of-action parameters. Importantly, we demonstrate that this technique readily permits to determine compound killing activities that might be otherwise missed by traditional, metabolism-based techniques. The analysis of a large set of antimalarial drugs reveals that this viability-based assay allows to discriminate compounds based on their antimalarial mode-of-action. This approach has been adapted to perform medium throughput screening, facilitating the identification of fast-acting antimalarial compounds, which are crucially needed for the control and possibly the eradication of malaria.     

The evolution of drug-resistant malaria: the role of drug elimination half-life

This paper seeks to define and quantify the influence of drug elimination half-life on the evolution of antimalarial drug resistance. There are assumed to be three general classes of susceptibility of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum to a drug: Res0, the original, susceptible wildtype; Res1, a group of intermediate levels of susceptibility that are more tolerant of the drug but still cleared by treatment; and Res2, which is completely resistant to the drug. Res1 and Res2 resistance both evolve much faster if the antimalarial drug has a long half-life. We show that previous models have significantly underestimated the rate of evolution of Res2 resistance by omitting the effects of drug half-life. The methodology has been extended to investigate (i) the effects of using drugs in combination, particularly when the components have differing half-lives, and (ii) the specific example of the development of resistance to the antimalarial pyrimethamine-sulphadoxine. An important detail of the model is the development of drug resistance in two separate phases. In phase A, Res1 is spreading and replacing the original sensitive forms while Res2 remains at a low level. Phase B starts once parasites are selected that can escape drug action (Res1 genotypes with borderline chemosensitivity, and Res2): these parasites are rapidly selected, a process that leads to widespread clinical failure. Drug treatment is clinically successful during phase A, and health workers may be unaware of the substantial changes in parasite population genetic structure that predicate the onset of phase B. Surveillance programs are essential, following the introduction of a new drug, to monitor effectively changes in treatment efficacy and thus provide advance warning of drug failure. The model is also applicable to the evolution of antibiotic resistance in bacteria: in particular, the need for these models to incorporate drug pharmacokinetics to avoid potentially large errors in their predictions.     

Interaction of chloroquine and its analogues with heme: An isothermal titration calorimetric study

Quinoline-containing drugs such as chloroquine and quinine have had a long and successful history in antimalarial chemotherapy. Identification of ferriprotoporphyrin IX ([Fe(III)PPIX], haematin) as the drug receptors for these antimalarials called for investigations of the binding affinity, mode of interaction, and the conditions affecting the interaction. The parameters obtained are significant in recent times with the emergence of chloroquine resistant strains of the malaria parasites. This has underlined the need to unravel the molecular mechanism of their action so as to meet the requirement of an alternative to the existing antimalarial drugs. The isothermal titration calorimetric studies on the interaction of chloroquine with haematin lead us to propose an altered mode of binding. The initial recognition is ionic in nature mediated by the propionyl group of haematin with the quaternary nitrogen on CQ. This ionic interaction induces a conformational change, such as to favour binding of subsequent CQ molecules. On the contrary, conditions emulating the cytosolic environment (pH 7.4 and 150 mM salt) reveal the hydrophobic force to be the sole contributor driving the interaction. Interaction of a carefully selected panel of quinoline antimalarial drugs with monomeric ferriprotoporphyrin IX has also been investigated at pH 5.6 mimicking the acidic environment prevalent in the food vacuoles of parasite, the center of drug activity, which are consistent with their antimalarial activity.