Tobacco WLIM1 is a novel F-actin binding protein involved in actin cytoskeleton remodeling

We used confocal microscopy and in vitro analyses to show that Nicotiana tabacum WLIM1, a LIM domain protein related to animal Cys-rich proteins, is a novel actin binding protein in plants. Green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged WLIM1 protein accumulated in the nucleus and cytoplasm of tobacco BY2 cells. It associated predominantly with actin cytoskeleton, as demonstrated by colabeling and treatment with actin-depolymerizing latrunculin B. High-speed cosedimentation assays revealed the ability of WLIM1 to bind directly to actin filaments with high affinity. Fluorescence recovery after photobleaching and fluorescence loss in photobleaching showed a highly dynamic in vivo interaction of WLIM1-GFP with actin filaments. Expression of WLIM1-GFP in BY2 cells significantly delayed depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton induced by latrunculin B treatment. WLIM1 also stabilized actin filaments in vitro. Importantly, expression of WLIM1-GFP in Nicotiana benthamiana leaves induces significant changes in actin cytoskeleton organization, specifically, fewer and thicker actin bundles than in control cells, suggesting that WLIM1 functions as an actin bundling protein. This hypothesis was confirmed by low-speed cosedimentation assays and direct observation of F-actin bundles that formed in vitro in the presence of WLIM1. Taken together, these data identify WLIM1 as a novel actin binding protein that increases actin cytoskeleton stability by promoting bundling of actin filaments.     

Actin bundling via LIM domains

The LIM domain is defined as a protein-protein interaction module involved in the regulation of diverse cellular processes including gene expression and cytoskeleton organization. We have recently shown that the tobacco WLIM1, a two LIM domain-containing protein, is able to bind to, stabilize and bundle actin filaments, suggesting that it participates to the regulation of actin cytoskeleton structure and dynamics. In the December issue of the Journal of Biological Chemistry we report a domain analysis that specifically ascribes the actin-related activities of WLIM1 to its two LIM domains. Results suggest that LIM domains function synergistically in the full-length protein to achieve optimal activities. Here we briefly summarize relevant data regarding the actin-related properties/functions of two LIM domain-containing proteins in plants and animals. In addition, we provide further evidence of cooperative effects between LIM domains by transiently expressing a chimeric multicopy WLIM1 protein in BY2 cells.Key words: Actin-binding proteins, actin-bundling, cysteine-rich proteins, cytoskeleton, LIM domainThe LIM domain is a ≈55 amino acid peptide domain that was first identified in 1990 as a common cystein-rich sequence found in the three homeodomain proteins LIN-11, Isl1 and MEC-3. It has since been found in a wide variety of eukaryotic proteins of diverse functions. Animals possess several families of LIM proteins, with members containing 1–5 LIM domains occasionally linked to other catalytic or protein-binding domains such as homeodomain, kinase and SH3 domains. In contrast, plants only possess two distinct sets of LIM proteins. One is plant-specific and has not been functionally characterized yet. The other one comprises proteins that exhibit the same overall structure as the animal cystein rich proteins (CRPs), i.e., two very similar LIM domains separated by a ≈50 amino acid-long interLIM domain and a relatively short and variable C-terminal domain (Fig. 1A). The mouse CRP2 protein was the first CRP reported to interact directly with actin filaments (AF) and to stabilize the latter.¹ Identical observations were subsequently described for the chicken CRP1 and tobacco WLIM1 proteins.^2,3 In addition, these two proteins were shown to arrange AF into cables both in vitro and in vivo and thus join the list of actin bundlers.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Domain maps for wild-type WLIM1 (A) and GFP-fused chimeric 3xWLIM1 (B). A. WLIM1 basically comprises a short N-terminal domain (Nt), two LIM domains (LIM1 and LIM2), an interLIM spacer (IL) and a C-terminal domain (Ct). B. 3xWLIM1 consists of three tandem WLIM1 copies. This chimeric protein has been fused in C-terminus to GFP and transiently expressed in tobacco BY2 cells.To identify the peptide domains of WLIM1 responsible for its actin-related properties/activities, we generated domain-deleted and single domain variants and submitted them to a series of in vivo and in vitro assays.⁴ Localization experiments established that both LIM domains are required to efficiently target the actin cytoskeleton in tobacco BY2 cells. High-speed (200,000 g) cosedimentation data confirmed that the actin-binding activity of WLIM1 relies on its LIM domains. Indeed, the deletion of either the first or the second LIM domain respectively resulted in a 5-fold and 10-fold decrease of the protein affinity for AF. Importantly, each single LIM domain was found able to interact with AF in an autonomous manner, although with a reduced affinity compared to the wild-type WLIM1. Low-speed (12,500 g) cosedimentation data and electron microscopy observations revealed that the actin bundling activity of WLIM1 is also triggered by its LIM domains. Surprisingly each single LIM domain was able to bundle AF in an autonomous manner, suggesting that WLIM1 has two discrete actin-bundling sites. However, the bundles induced by the variants containing only one LIM domain, i.e., LIM domain-deleted mutants and single LIM domains, differed from those induced by the full-length WLIM1. They appeared more wavy and loosely packed and formed only at relatively high protein:actin ratios. Together these data suggest that LIM domains are autonomous actin-binding and -bundling modules that function in synergy in wild-type WLIM1 to achieve optimal activities.To further assess the mechanism of cooperation between the LIM domains of plant CRP-related proteins, we generated a chimeric protein composed of three WLIM1 copies in tandem (3 × WLIM1, Fig. 1B), and transiently expressed it as a GFP-fusion in tobacco BY2 cells. We anticipated that such a six LIM domain-containing protein displays an even higher actin-bundling activity. (Fig. 2A) shows the typical actin cytoskeleton pattern in an expanding BY2 cell as visualized using the actin marker GFP-fABD2.⁵ As previously reported by Sheahan et al.,⁵ GFP-fABD2 decorated dense, transversely oriented, cortical networks as well as transvacuolar strands connecting the subcortical-perinuclear region to the cortex. Ectopic expression of WLIM1-GFP (BY2 cells normally do not express the WLIM1 gene) induced moderate but perceptible modifications of the actin cytoskeleton structure (Fig. 2B). Most AF are arranged in bundles thicker than those observed in GFP-fABD2 expressing cells and fine AF arrays are less frequently observed. As expected, this phenotype was significantly enhanced in cells transformed with the 3xWLIM1-GFP protein (Fig. 2C). Indeed, cells were almost devoided of fine AF arrays and exhibited very thick actin cables (Fig. 2C) that, at times (≈30 %), form atypical long looped structures (Fig. 2D). The appearance of such structures may result from the increase of cable stability and thickness induced by the 3xWLIM1-GFP protein, as these parameters are likely to determine, at least partially, the maximal length of actin bundles. Together the present observations support earlier data showing that LIM domains work in concert in LIM proteins to regulate actin bundling in plant cells. Strikingly, vertebrate and plant CRPs invariably contain two LIM domains. The lack, in these organisms, of CRP-related proteins combining more than two LIM domains may be explained by the fact that very thick cables, such as those induced by the artificial 3xWLIM1, may be too stable structures incompatible with the necessary high degree of actin cytoskeleton plasticity. As an exception, a muscle CRP-related protein with five LIM domains (Mlp84B) has been identified in Drosophila.⁶ However, rather than decorating actin filaments in an homogenous manner, this protein has been found to concentrate in a specialized region of the Z-discs where it stabilizes, in concert with D-titin, muscle sarcomeres.⁷Open in a separate windowFigure 2Typical actin cytoskeleton patterns in tobacco BY2 cells that have been transiently transformed, using a particle gun, with GFP-fABD2 (A), WLIM1-GFP (B), and 3xWLIM1-GFP (C and D). For each construct, more than 60 cells were analyzed by confocal microscopy. In the case of 3xWLIM1-GFP, two prevalent patterns have been observed (C and D). Bars = 20 µm.The relatively well conserved spacer length (≈50 amino acids) that separates the two LIM domains in vertebrate CRPs and related plant LIM proteins remains an intriguing feature the importance of which in actin cable organization remains to be established. Using electron microscopy we are currently evaluating the effects of the modification of the interLIM domain length on the structural properties of actin cables.     

Glycine-rich region regulates cysteine-rich protein 1 binding to actin cytoskeleton

Cysteine-rich protein 1 (CRP1) has a unique structure with two well separated LIM domains, each followed by a glycine-rich region. Although CRP1 has been shown to interact with actin-binding proteins and actin filaments, the mechanism regulating localization to the actin cytoskeleton in cells is not clear. Experiments using truncated forms showed that the first LIM domain and glycine-rich region are necessary for CRP1 bundling of actin filaments and localization to the actin cytoskeleton. Furthermore, domain swapping experiments replacing the first glycine-rich region with the second resulted in the loss of CRP1 bundling activity and localization to the actin cytoskeleton, identifying seven critical amino acid residues. These results highlight the importance of the first glycine-rich region for CRP1 bundling activity and localization to the actin cytoskeleton. In addition, this work identifies the first LIM domain and glycine-rich region as a distinct actin filament bundling module.     

Actin filament bundling by fimbrin is important for endocytosis, cytokinesis, and polarization in fission yeast

Through the coordinated action of diverse actin-binding proteins, cells simultaneously assemble actin filaments with distinct architectures and dynamics to drive different processes. Actin filament cross-linking proteins organize filaments into higher order networks, although the requirement of cross-linking activity in cells has largely been assumed rather than directly tested. Fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe assembles actin into three discrete structures: endocytic actin patches, polarizing actin cables, and the cytokinetic contractile ring. The fission yeast filament cross-linker fimbrin Fim1 primarily localizes to Arp2/3 complex-nucleated branched filaments of the actin patch and by a lesser amount to bundles of linear antiparallel filaments in the contractile ring. It is unclear whether Fim1 associates with bundles of parallel filaments in actin cables. We previously discovered that a principal role of Fim1 is to control localization of tropomyosin Cdc8, thereby facilitating cofilin-mediated filament turnover. Therefore, we hypothesized that the bundling ability of Fim1 is dispensable for actin patches but is important for the contractile ring and possibly actin cables. By directly visualizing actin filament assembly using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy, we determined that Fim1 bundles filaments in both parallel and antiparallel orientations and efficiently bundles Arp2/3 complex-branched filaments in the absence but not the presence of actin capping protein. Examination of cells exclusively expressing a truncated version of Fim1 that can bind but not bundle actin filaments revealed that bundling activity of Fim1 is in fact important for all three actin structures. Therefore, fimbrin Fim1 has diverse roles as both a filament "gatekeeper" and as a filament cross-linker.     

Mechanistic differences in actin bundling activity of two mammalian formins, FRL1 and mDia2

Formin proteins are regulators of actin dynamics, mediating assembly of unbranched actin filaments. These multidomain proteins are defined by the presence of a Formin Homology 2 (FH2) domain. Previous work has shown that FH2 domains bind to filament barbed ends and move processively at the barbed end as the filament elongates. Here we report that two FH2 domains, from mammalian FRL1 and mDia2, also bundle filaments, whereas the FH2 domain from mDia1 cannot under similar conditions. The FH2 domain alone is sufficient for bundling. Bundled filaments made by either FRL1 or mDia2 are in both parallel and anti-parallel orientations. A novel property that might contribute to bundling is the ability of the dimeric FH2 domains from both FRL1 and mDia2 to dissociate and recombine. This property is not observed for mDia1. A difference between FRL1 and mDia2 is that FRL1-mediated bundling is competitive with barbed end binding, whereas mDia2-mediated bundling is not. Mutation of a highly conserved isoleucine residue in the FH2 domain does not inhibit bundling by either FRL1 or mDia2, but inhibits barbed end activities. However, the severity of this mutation varies between formins. For mDia1 and mDia2, the mutation strongly inhibits all effects of barbed end binding, but affects FRL1 much less strongly. Furthermore, our results suggest that the Ile mutation affects processivity. Taken together, our data suggest that the bundling activities of FRL1 and mDia2, while producing phenotypically similar bundles, differ in mechanistic detail.     

MAP2c, but not tau, binds and bundles F-actin via its microtubule binding domain

BACKGROUND: MAP2 and tau are abundant microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs) in neurons. The development of neuronal dendrites and axons requires a dynamic interaction between microtubules and actin filaments. MAPs represent good candidates to mediate such interactions. Although MAP2c and tau have similar, well-characterized microtubule binding activities, their actin interaction is poorly understood. RESULTS: Here, we show by using a cosedimentation assay that MAP2c binds F-actin. Upon actin binding, MAP2c organizes F-actin into closely packed actin bundles. Moreover, we show by using a deletion approach that MAP2c's microtubule binding domain (MTBD) is both necessary and sufficient for both F-actin binding and bundling activities. Surprisingly, even though the MAP2 and tau MTBDs share high sequence homology and possess similar microtubule binding activities, tau is unable to bind or bundle F-actin. Furthermore, experiments with chimeric proteins demonstrate that the actin binding activity fully correlates with the ability to promote neurite initiation in neuroblastoma cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results provide the first demonstration that the MAP2c and tau MTBD domains exhibit distinct properties, diverging in actin binding and neurite initiation activities. These results implicate a novel actin function for MAP2c in neuronal morphogenesis and furthermore suggest that actin interactions could contribute to functional differences between MAP2 and tau in neurons.     

The filamentous actin cross-linking/bundling activity of mammalian formins

Formins are multidomain proteins that regulate actin filament dynamics and are defined by the formin homology 2 domain. Biochemical assays suggest that mammalian formins display actin-filament nucleation, severing, and bundling activities. Whether formins can cross-link actin filaments into viscoelastic arrays and the effectiveness of formins' bundling activity compared with that of important filamentous actin (F-actin) cross-linking/bundling proteins are unknown. Here, we used rigorous in vitro rheologic assays to deconvolve the dynamic cross-linking activity from the bundling activity of formin FRL1 and the closely related mDia1 and mDia2. In addition, we compared these formins with the canonical F-actin bundling protein fascin and cross-linking/bundling proteins alpha-actinin and filamin. We found that FRL1 and mDia2, but not mDia1, can help F-actin form highly elastic networks. FRL1 and mDia2 mediate the formation of highly elastic F-actin networks as effectively and rapidly as alpha-actinin and filamin but only past a relatively high actin-to-formin molar ratio of 50:1. Past that threshold molar ratio, the mechanical properties of F-actin/formin networks are independent of formin concentration, similar to fascin. Moreover, unlike those for alpha-actinin and filamin but similar to those for fascin, F-actin/formin networks show no strain-induced hardening. mDia1 cannot bundle F-actin but can weakly cross-link filaments at high concentrations. Point mutagenesis reveals that reducing the barbed-end binding activity of FRL1 and mDia2 greatly enhances the rate of formation of F-actin gels but does not significantly affect the mechanical properties of the resulting networks at steady state. Together, these results suggest that the mechanical behaviors of FRL1 and mDia2 are fundamentally different from those of cross-linking/bundling proteins alpha-actinin and filamin but qualitatively similar to the mechanical behavior of the bundling protein fascin, albeit with a dramatically increased (>10-fold) threshold concentration for transition to bundling, which nevertheless leads to much stiffer F-actin networks than fascin.     

The Arg non-receptor tyrosine kinase modifies F-actin structure

The Arg (Abl-related gene) protein belongs to the Abl family of non-receptor tyrosine kinases that regulate cell motility and morphogenesis. It contains two actin-binding domains, one containing the talin-like I/LWEQ motif, and a C-terminal calponin homology (CH) domain. We used electron microscopy and single particle image analysis to reconstruct complexes of F-actin with full-length Arg, and fragments lacking either the I/LWEQ or CH domains. The Arg CH domain binds to actin's subdomain-1 (SD1) and induces a tilt of actin protomers. The I/LWEQ domain binds to either SD1 or SD4, closing the nucleotide binding cleft of actin. Although Arg can use either its CH or ILWEQ domains to bind an actin filament, both domains within Arg cannot bind simultaneously to adjacent protomers in the filament, consistent with its F-actin-bundling activity. The conformational changes in the filament introduced by Arg can explain the cooperative binding of Arg to F-actin and might prevent other actin binding proteins from binding to actin filaments.     

Arabidopsis VILLIN1 generates actin filament cables that are resistant to depolymerization

Dynamic cytoplasmic streaming, organelle positioning, and nuclear migration use molecular tracks generated from actin filaments arrayed into higher-order structures like actin cables and bundles. How these arrays are formed and stabilized against cellular depolymerizing forces remains an open question. Villin and fimbrin are the best characterized actin-filament bundling or cross-linking proteins in plants and each is encoded by a multigene family of five members in Arabidopsis thaliana. The related villins and gelsolins are conserved proteins that are constructed from a core of six homologous gelsolin domains. Gelsolin is a calcium-regulated actin filament severing, nucleating and barbed end capping factor. Villin has a seventh domain at its C terminus, the villin headpiece, which can bind to an actin filament, conferring the ability to crosslink or bundle actin filaments. Many, but not all, villins retain the ability to sever, nucleate, and cap filaments. Here we have identified a putative calcium-insensitive villin isoform through comparison of sequence alignments between human gelsolin and plant villins with x-ray crystallography data for vertebrate gelsolin. VILLIN1 (VLN1) has the least well-conserved type 1 and type 2 calcium binding sites among the Arabidopsis VILLIN isoforms. Recombinant VLN1 binds to actin filaments with high affinity (K(d) approximately 1 microM) and generates bundled filament networks; both properties are independent of the free Ca(2+) concentration. Unlike human plasma gelsolin, VLN1 does not nucleate the assembly of filaments from monomer, does not block the polymerization of profilin-actin onto barbed ends, and does not stimulate depolymerization or sever preexisting filaments. In kinetic assays with ADF/cofilin, villin appears to bind first to growing filaments and protects filaments against ADF-mediated depolymerization. We propose that VLN1 is a major regulator of the formation and stability of actin filament bundles in plant cells and that it functions to maintain the cable network even in the presence of stimuli that result in depolymerization of other actin arrays.     

Cooperative regulation of endocytic vesicle transport by yeast Eps15-like protein Pan1p and epsins

Dynamic actin filaments are required for the formation and internalization of endocytic vesicles. Yeast actin cables serve as a track for the translocation of endocytic vesicles to early endosomes, but the molecular mechanisms regulating the interaction between vesicles and the actin cables remain ambiguous. Previous studies have demonstrated that the yeast Eps15-like protein Pan1p plays an important role in this interaction, and that interaction is not completely lost even after deletion of the Pan1p actin-binding domain, suggesting that additional proteins mediate association of the vesicle with the actin cable. Other candidates for mediating the interaction are endocytic coat proteins Sla2p (yeast Hip1R) and Ent1p/2p (yeast epsins), as these proteins can bind to both the plasma membrane and the actin filament. Here, we investigated the degree of redundancy in the actin-binding activities of Pan1p, Sla2p, and Ent1p/2p involved in the internalization and transport of endocytic vesicles. Expression of the nonphosphorylatable form of Pan1p, Pan1-18TA, caused abnormal accumulation of both actin cables and endocytic vesicles, and this accumulation was additively suppressed by deletion of the actin-binding domains of both Pan1p and Ent1p. Interestingly, deletion of the actin-binding domains of Pan1p and Ent1p in cells lacking the ENT2 gene resulted in severely defective internalization of endocytic vesicles and recruitment of actin cables to the site of endocytosis. These results suggest that Pan1p and Ent1p/2p cooperatively regulate the interaction between the endocytic vesicle and the actin cable.     

hhLIM is a novel F-actin binding protein involved in actin cytoskeleton remodeling

Human heart LIM protein (hhLIM) is a newly cloned protein. In vitro analyses showed that green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged hhLIM protein accumulated in the cytoplasm of C2C12 cells and colocalized with F-actin, indicating that hhLIM is an actin-binding protein in C2C12 cells. Overexpression of hhLIM-GFP in C2C12 cells significantly stabilized actin filaments and delayed depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton induced by cytochalasin B treatment. Expression of hhLIM-GFP in C2C12 cells also induced significant changes in the organization of the actin cytoskeleton, specifically, fewer and thicker actin bundles than in control cells, suggesting that hhLIM functions as an actin-bundling protein. This hypothesis was confirmed using low-speed co-sedimentation assays and direct observation of F-actin bundles that formed in vitro in the presence of hhLIM. hhLIM has two LIM domains. To identify the essential regions and sites for association, a series of truncated mutants was constructed which showed that LIM domain 2 has the same activity as full-length hhLIM. To further characterize the binding sites, the LIM domain was functionally destructed by replacing cysteine with serine in domain 2, and results showed that the second LIM domain plays a central role in bundling of F-actin. Taken together, these data identify hhLIM as an actin-binding protein that increases actin cytoskeleton stability by promoting bundling of actin filaments.     

Binding of dystrophin's tandem calponin homology domain to F-actin is modulated by actin's structure

Dystrophin has been shown to be associated in cells with actin bundles. Dys-246, an N-terminal recombinant protein encoding the first 246 residues of dystrophin, includes two calponin-homology (CH) domains, and is similar to a large class of F-actin cross-linking proteins including alpha-actinin, fimbrin, and spectrin. It has been shown that expression or microinjection of amino-terminal fragments of dystrophin or the closely related utrophin resulted in the localization of these protein domains to actin bundles. However, in vitro studies have failed to detect any bundling of actin by either intact dystrophin or Dys-246. We show here that the structure of F-actin can be modulated so that there are two modes of Dys-246 binding, from bundling actin filaments to only binding to single filaments. The changes in F-actin structure that allow Dys-246 to bundle filaments are induced by covalent modification of Cys-374, proteolytic cleavage of F-actin's C-terminus, mutation of yeast actin's N-terminus, and different buffers. The present results suggest that F-actin's structural state can have a large influence on the nature of actin's interaction with other proteins, and these different states need to be considered when conducting in vitro assays.     

The Allosteric Mechanism Induced by Protein Kinase A (PKA) Phosphorylation of Dematin (Band 4.9)

Dematin (band 4.9) is an F-actin binding and bundling protein best known for its role within red blood cells, where it both stabilizes as well as attaches the spectrin/actin cytoskeleton to the erythrocytic membrane. Here, we investigate the structural consequences of phosphorylating serine 381, a covalent modification that turns off F-actin bundling activity. In contrast to the canonical doctrine, in which phosphorylation of an intrinsically disordered region/protein confers affinity for another domain/protein, we found the converse to be true of dematin: phosphorylation of the well folded C-terminal villin-type headpiece confers affinity for its intrinsically disordered N-terminal core domain. We employed analytical ultracentrifugation to demonstrate that dematin is monomeric, in contrast to the prevailing view that it is trimeric. Next, using a series of truncation mutants, we verified that dematin has two F-actin binding sites, one in the core domain and the other in the headpiece domain. Although the phosphorylation-mimicking mutant, S381E, was incapable of bundling microfilaments, it retains the ability to bind F-actin. We found that a phosphorylation-mimicking mutant, S381E, eliminated the ability to bundle, but not bind F-actin filaments. Lastly, we show that the S381E point mutant caused the headpiece domain to associate with the core domain, leading us to the mechanism for cAMP-dependent kinase control of dematin''s F-actin bundling activity: when unphosphorylated, dematin''s two F-actin binding domains move independent of one another permitting them to bind different F-actin filaments. Phosphorylation causes these two domains to associate, forming a compact structure, and sterically eliminating one of these F-actin binding sites.     

The Interaction of Vinculin with Actin

Vinculin can interact with F-actin both in recruitment of actin filaments to the growing focal adhesions and also in capping of actin filaments to regulate actin dynamics. Using molecular dynamics, both interactions are simulated using different vinculin conformations. Vinculin is simulated either with only its vinculin tail domain (Vt), with all residues in its closed conformation, with all residues in an open I conformation, and with all residues in an open II conformation. The open I conformation results from movement of domain 1 away from Vt; the open II conformation results from complete dissociation of Vt from the vinculin head domains. Simulation of vinculin binding along the actin filament showed that Vt alone can bind along the actin filaments, that vinculin in its closed conformation cannot bind along the actin filaments, and that vinculin in its open I conformation can bind along the actin filaments. The simulations confirm that movement of domain 1 away from Vt in formation of vinculin 1 is sufficient for allowing Vt to bind along the actin filament. Simulation of Vt capping actin filaments probe six possible bound structures and suggest that vinculin would cap actin filaments by interacting with both S1 and S3 of the barbed-end, using the surface of Vt normally occluded by D4 and nearby vinculin head domain residues. Simulation of D4 separation from Vt after D1 separation formed the open II conformation. Binding of open II vinculin to the barbed-end suggests this conformation allows for vinculin capping. Three binding sites on F-actin are suggested as regions that could link to vinculin. Vinculin is suggested to function as a variable switch at the focal adhesions. The conformation of vinculin and the precise F-actin binding conformation is dependent on the level of mechanical load on the focal adhesion.     

Synthetic actin-binding domains reveal compositional constraints for function

The actin-binding domains of many proteins consist of a canonical type 1/type 2 arrangement of the structurally conserved calponin homology domain. Using the actin-binding domain of alpha-actinin-1 as a scaffold we have generated synthetic actin-binding domains by altering position and composition of the calponin homology domains. We show that the presence of two calponin homology domains alone and in the context of an actin-binding domain is not sufficient for actin-binding, and that both single and homotypic type 2 calponin homology domain tandems fail to bind to actin in vitro and in transfected cells. In contrast, single and tandem type 1 calponin homology domain arrays bind actin directly but result in defective turnover rates on actin filaments, and in aberrant actin bundling when introduced into the full-length alpha-actinin molecule. An actin-binding domain harboring the calponin homology domains in an inverted position, however, functions both in isolation and in the context of the dimeric alpha-actinin molecule. Our data demonstrate that the dynamics and specificity of actin-binding via actin-binding domains requires both the filament binding properties of the type 1, and regulation by type 2 calponin homology domains, and appear independent of their position.     

Evidence for a Conformational Change in Actin Induced by Fimbrin (N375) Binding

Fimbrin belongs to a superfamily of actin cross-linking proteins that share a conserved 27-kD actin-binding domain. This domain contains a tandem duplication of a sequence that is homologous to calponin. Calponin homology (CH) domains not only cross-link actin filaments into bundles and networks, but they also bind intermediate filaments and some signal transduction proteins to the actin cytoskeleton. This fundamental role of CH domains as a widely used actin-binding domain underlines the necessity to understand their structural interaction with actin. Using electron cryomicroscopy, we have determined the three-dimensional structure of F-actin and F-actin decorated with the NH₂-terminal CH domains of fimbrin (N375). In a difference map between actin filaments and N375-decorated actin, one end of N375 is bound to a concave surface formed between actin subdomains 1 and 2 on two neighboring actin monomers. In addition, a fit of the atomic model for the actin filament to the maps reveals the actin residues that line, the binding surface. The binding of N375 changes actin, which we interpret as a movement of subdomain 1 away from the bound N375. This change in actin structure may affect its affinity for other actin-binding proteins and may be part of the regulation of the cytoskeleton itself. Difference maps between actin and actin decorated with other proteins provides a way to look for novel structural changes in actin.     

Two distinct regions of calponin share common binding sites on actin resulting in different modes of calponin–actin interaction

Calponins are a small family of proteins that alter the interaction between actin and myosin II and mediate signal transduction. These proteins bind F-actin in a complex manner that depends on a variety of parameters such as stoichiometry and ionic strength. Calponin binds G-actin and F-actin, bundling the latter primarily through two distinct and adjacent binding sites (ABS1 and ABS2). Calponin binds other proteins that bind F-actin and considerable disagreements exist as to how calponin is located on the filament, especially in the presence of other proteins. A study (Galkin, V.E., Orlova, A., Fattoum, A., Walsh, M.P. and Egelman, E.H. (2006) J. Mol. Biol. 359, 478–485.), using EM single-particle reconstruction has shown that there may be four modes of interaction, but how these occur is not yet known. We report that two distinct regions of calponin are capable of binding some of the same sites on actin (such as 18–28 and 360–372 in subdomain 1). This accounts for the finding that calponin binds the filament with different apparent geometries. We suggest that the four modes of filament binding account for differences in stoichiometry and that these, in turn, arise from differential binding of the two calponin regions to actin. It is likely that the modes of binding are reciprocally influenced by other actin-binding proteins since members of the α-actinin group also adopt different actin-binding positions and bind actin principally through a domain that is similar to calponin's ABS1.     

Palladin is an actin cross-linking protein that uses immunoglobulin-like domains to bind filamentous actin

Palladin is a recently described phosphoprotein that plays an important role in cell adhesion and motility. Previous studies have shown that palladin overexpression results in profound changes in actin organization in cultured cells. Palladin binds to the actin-associated proteins alpha-actinin, vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein, profilin, Eps8, and ezrin, suggesting that it may affect actin organization indirectly. To determine its molecular function in generating actin arrays, we purified palladin and asked if it is also capable of binding to F-actin directly. In co-sedimentation and differential sedimentation assays, palladin was found to both bind and cross-link actin filaments. This bundling activity was confirmed by fluorescence and electron microscopy. Palladin fragments were then purified and used to determine the sequences necessary to bind and bundle F-actin. The Ig3 domain of palladin bound to F-actin, and a palladin fragment containing Ig3, Ig4, and the region linking these domains was identified as a fragment that was able to bundle F-actin. Because palladin has multiple Ig domains, and only one of them binds to F-actin, this suggests that different Ig domains may be specialized for distinct biological functions. In addition, our results suggest a potential role for palladin in generating specialized, actin-based cell morphologies via both direct actin cross-linking activity and indirect scaffolding activity.