Triple Therapy with Lansoprazole, Clarithromycin, and Amoxicillin for the Cure of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Short Report

Background Given the therapeutic potential of proton pump inhibitor-based triple therapy for successful cure of Helicobacter pylori infection, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of lansoprazole with clarithromycin and amoxicillin in an open-label, single-center study.
Materials and Methods. H. pylori -positive patients self-administered lansoprazole, 30 mg; clarithromycin, 500 mg; and amoxicillin, 1 gm bid for 14 days. Patients were assessed pretreatment, at which time the presence of H. pylori was documented by rapid urease test, culture, or histology, following study drug administration (week 2) for a brief evaluation only, and at least 4 weeks posttreatment (week 6), which included endoscopy with collection of biopsy specimens for culture and histology testing.
Results. Primary clarithromycin and metronidazole resistance were observed in 6% (2 of 30) and 43% (13 of 30) of study patients, respectively. One month after the end of therapy, H. pylori infection was cured in 23 of 25 patients (92%; 95% confidence interval, 74%-99%). The triple-therapy regimen was well-tolerated; 17% of patients (5 of 30) reported mild to moderate adverse effects during the treatment period.
Conclusion. A 2-week, triple-drug combination of lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin is highly effective for cure of H. pylori infection. Additionally, the triple-drug combination was well-tolerated by patients infected with H. pylori.     

Seven-Day Triple Therapy with Lansoprazole, Clarithromycin, and Metronidazole for the Cure of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Short Report

Background To refine our understanding of anti- Helicobacter pylori treatment regimens further, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of lansoprazole given in combination with clarithromycin and metronidazole for 7 days in an open-label, multicenter study.
Materials and Methods. H. pylori -positive patients self-administered lansoprazole, 30 mg; clarithromycin, 500 mg; and metronidazole, 500 mg bid for 7 days. Patients were assessed at pretreatment, at which time the presence of H. pylori was documented by rapid urease test or histology and culture, following study drug administration (week 1) for a brief evaluation only, and at least 4 weeks posttreatment (week 5), including endoscopy with collection of biopsy specimens for culture and histology testing.
Results. Of the 60 patients enrolled in the study, 59 had confirmed H. pylori infection, and 51 were included in an intent-to-treat analysis of efficacy. Primary metronidazole and clarithromycin resistance were observed in 84% and 8% of study patients, respectively. One month after the end of therapy, H. pylori infection was cured in 40 of 51 patients (78%); 95% confidence interval, 65%–89%). The triple-therapy regimen was well-tolerated, with only 2 patients (4%) requiring premature withdrawal from the study due to treatment-related adverse events. Taste perversion (15.0%) and diarrhea (11.7%) were the most frequently reported adverse events possibly or probably related to study medication during the treatment period.
Conclusion. Despite a high prevalence of metronidazole resistance, a 1-week, triple-drug combination of lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and metronidazole is effective treatment for and well-tolerated by patients with H. pylori infection.     

2-week triple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection is better than 1-week in clinical practice: a large prospective single-center randomized study

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapies are considered the standard regimens for Helicobacter pylori eradication, but the optimal duration of these regimens is still controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 1-week versus 2-week triple therapies in H. pylori-positive patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 486 consecutive H. pylori-positive patients were randomized to receive omeprazole, 20 mg b.i.d., clarithromycin 500 mg b.i.d., and either amoxicillin 1 g b.i.d. or metronidazole 500 mg b.i.d. for 1 or 2 weeks. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and histology were performed at entry and 2 months after the end of therapy. H. pylori status was defined according to histology and urea breath test. RESULTS: At intention-to-treat analysis, 2-week therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin achieved a significantly higher eradication rate than 1- or 2-week regimens with metronidazole (70% versus 52%, p = .003, versus 56%, p < .01) and the same therapy for 1-week (70% versus 57%, p = .05). At per-protocol analysis, 2-week therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin showed a significantly higher eradication rate than 1-week of amoxicillin and metronidazole (77% versus 62%; p = .03) but no difference with 1-week same regimen (66%) or 2-week metronidazole and clarithromycin regimen (72%). Compliance and tolerability were good for all regimens. CONCLUSIONS: Two-week therapies, independently of antibiotic combination, lead to a significant increase of H. pylori eradication rate compared to 1-week therapies, with same compliance and tolerability, even if, taking account of low-eradication rates, one must question whether the triple therapy should still be used.     

Levofloxacin-containing triple therapy to eradicate the persistent H. pylori after a failed conventional triple therapy

OBJECTIVE: To identify the optimal dosage of levofloxacin to eradicate persistent Helicobacter pylori when triple therapy with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and omeprazole fails. METHODS: We investigated 124 patients whose triple therapy including clarithromycin had failed. Clarithromycin resistance was indirectly assessed by the (13)C-urea breath test, with a post-treatment value cut-off point at 15. All patients were randomly divided into two groups, to receive 1-week amoxicillin 1 g and lansoprazole 30 mg twice daily, plus either levofloxacin 500 mg once (ALL-500 group) or twice daily (ALL-1000 group). Six weeks later, the (13)C-urea breath test was repeated to assess whether H. pylori was eradicated. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis showed no difference in H. pylori eradication rates in both the ALL-500 and ALL-1000 groups (ITT: 79% vs. 80.6%, p > .05; PP: 86% vs. 87.5%, p > .05). For both groups, the per-protocol H. pylori eradication rates were also similarly high between patients with a post-treatment value of (13)C-urea breath test < or = 15 and those with a value > 15 (ALL-500: 85% vs. 86.5%, p > .05; ALL-1000: 88.9% vs. 86.8%, p > .05). CONCLUSION: One-week levofloxacin 500 mg daily-based triple therapy is effective for eradicating the persistent H. pylori after a failed triple therapy with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, and omeprazole.     

Comparison of seven and fourteen days of lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin therapy for eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a report from India

Background. In developed countries, a 1-week regimen of combined proton pump inhibitors and two antibiotics is considered adequate for Helicobacter pylori eradication. However, there is a paucity of reports from developing countries on treatment duration of less than 14 days. We compared efficacy of 7 and 14 days of lansoprazole (L), clarithromycin (C), and amoxicillin (A) combinations for eradication of H. pylori.
Patients and Methods. Forty-six consecutive patients who presented with upper gastrointestinal symptoms and tested positive for H. pylori infection were included in the study. In every patient, after performance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy, antral biopsies were obtained. H. pylori infection was diagnosed by positive rapid urease test and identification of organisms on antral histology. Patients were randomly selected to receive lansoprazole, 30 mg once daily, plus clarithromycin, 250 mg twice daily, plus amoxicillin, 500 mg three times daily for 2 weeks ( group 1; n = 24; age , 36 ± 12 years ; 18 men ) or 1 week ( group 2; n = 22; age , 45 ± 15 years ; 12 men ). One month after completion of treatment, repeat upper gastrointestinal endoscopy was performed. H. pylori eradication was defined as absence of organism on histopathological examination of both antrum and body of stomach and negative rapid urease test.
Results. Eradication rate was higher in group 1 (23 of 24; 96%) as compared to group 2 (12 of 22; 54%; p < .05). One patient in group 1 had diarrhea, and one patient in group two had skin rash and itching.
Conclusions. Fourteen-day therapy with lansoprazole, clarithromycin, and amoxicillin is highly effective in eradication of H. pylori. Reducing duration of therapy to 7 days significantly lowers eradication rates.     

Four-day, twice daily, quadruple therapy with amoxicillin, clarithromycin, tinidazole and omeprazole to cure Helicobacter pylori infection: a pilot study

Background. The best regimen for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection has yet to be defined. Four-day quadruple therapy with tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth, and a proton pump inhibitor has been shown to obtain a very high cure rate. However, the fact that it must be taken four times daily may interfere with compliance. The objective of the study was to test the efficacy and tolerability of a new 4-day therapy with 4 drugs taken every 12 hours to cure H. pylori infection.
Patients and Methods. Fifty-six consecutive patients with peptic ulcer disease and H. pylori infection were treated with an oral 4-day course with omeprazole (20 mg/12 hours), clarithromycin (500 mg/12 hours), amoxicillin (1 g/12 hours) and tinidazole (500 mg/12 hours). Efficacy of the treatment was determined at least 2 months after therapy either by biopsy (in the case of gastric ulcer) or by ¹³C-urea breath test. A second breath test was performed at least 6 months after therapy.
Results. Two patients were lost to follow-up. Forty-nine of the remaining 54 patients were cured at the first control [intention-to-treat cure rate: 87.5% (CI 95% 75–94%); per protocol cure rate: 90.7% (CI 95% 81–98%)]. Forty-three of these 49 cured patients returned for a second ¹³C urea breath-test at 6–12 months. Two of them were not cured, giving a long-term cure rate of 85.5% per protocol and 73.2% by intention-to-treat. Compliance was good, although 25 patients had mild side effects.
Conclusion. This particular four-day therapy is well tolerated, easy to follow, and achieves an acceptably high cure rate.     

An Alternative Non-Macrolide, Non-Imidazole Treatment Regimen for Curing Helicobacter pylori and Duodenal Ulcers: Ranitidine Bismuth Citrate Plus Amoxicillin

Background. Because patients who fail to be cured of H. pylori infection following macrolide or imidazole therapy are difficult to treat, there is a clear need for a reasonably effective and simple second-line treatment regimen. The purpose of these two studies was to evaluate the efficacy of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC) plus amoxicillin for the cure of H. pylori infection and for healing duodenal ulcers and preventing ulcer relapse.
Materials and Methods. Two identically designed randomized, double-blind, double-dummy studies were conducted in patients with an H. pylori -associated duodenal ulcer. Patients were treated with either RBC 400 mg bid for 4 weeks plus amoxicillin 500 mg qid for 2 weeks, RBC 400 mg bid for 4 weeks and placebo qid for 2 weeks, placebo bid for 4 weeks and amoxicillin 500 mg qid for 2 weeks, or placebo bid for 4 weeks and placebo qid for 2 weeks. Patients with healed ulcers after 4 weeks of treatment were eligible for entry into a 24-week observation phase for the assessment of H. pylori status (culture, histology, and CLOtest^TM) and ulcer relapse.
Results. A total of 229 patients with confirmed H. pylori infection at baseline were evaluated. Of these, 132 whose ulcers had healed entered the 24-week posttreatment observation phase. The combination of RBC plus amoxicillin resulted in higher H. pylori cure rates (55%) and higher duodenal ulcer healing (74%) than did either treatment alone. All treatments were well tolerated.
Conclusions. The combination of ranitidine bismuth citrate plus amoxicillin cures H. pylori infection in more than half of the patients treated. This treatment regimen shows promise as the basis for future non-macrolide, non-imidazole triple therapy regimens for curing H. pylori infection. Such regimens may be appropriate second-line treatment for patients who are resistant to or who are unable to tolerate macrolide- or imidazole-containing therapies.     

Helicobacter pylori infection in Turkish children: comparison of diagnostic tests, evaluation of eradication rate, and changes in symptoms after eradication

BACKGROUND: Helicobacter pylori infection is most frequently acquired in childhood. After this organism is eradicated, the rate of reinfection is low. Thus, it is very important to diagnose and treat the disease appropriately in childhood, and to be able to assess eradication with certainty. Eradication of H. pylori infection is reported to reduce or eliminate abdominal pain and dyspeptic symptoms in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study involved 102 children who had already been diagnosed with symptomatic H. pylori infection based on gastric histopathological examination, urea breath test, rapid urease test, serology and culture. Each patient's symptoms and family history of gastrointestinal problems were recorded. Using histology as the gold standard for identifying H. pylori infection, we determined the diagnostic sensitivity of each of the other methods. Omeprazole or lansoprazole, amoxicillin and clarithromycin were administered as eradication treatment, and each patient was re-evaluated by urea breath test 8 weeks later. Each child was re-interviewed about symptoms after treatment. These answers and the results of drug sensitivity testing were recorded. Cases of failed eradication were re-treated with a quadruple-drug regimen of tetracycline, metronidazole, bismuth subsalicylate and omeprazole. RESULTS: The most frequent symptom was abdominal pain (89.2%). Fifty-four per cent of the subjects had a family history of dyspeptic symptoms. Sixty-six patients (64.7%) exhibited nodularity in the antral mucosa. The sensitivities of the diagnostic tests in histologically proven cases were as follows: urea breath test 100%, rapid urease test 89.2%, serology 71.9%, and culture 54.9%. Metronidazole had the highest frequency of resistance (36.4%) and the rate of clarithromycin resistance was 18.2%. The eradication rate after first-line therapy was 75.5%, and abdominal pain and dyspeptic symptoms were reduced or completely resolved in 75.7% of the successful-eradication cases. The proportion of failed-eradication cases that responded well to quadruple-drug therapy was 93.8%. CONCLUSION: Symptomatic H. pylori infection in a child should always be treated. The urea breath test is an accurate and reliable way to identify H. pylori-positive patients and to determine the response to treatment. Triple-agent therapy is effective for eradicating H. pylori infection in children and usually helps reduce or eliminate dyspeptic symptoms. The level of H. pylori resistance to metronidazole is high in our region. The significant rate of resistance to clarithromycin (18.1%) may explain the treatment failure observed in this study.     

Six regimens for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) in duodenal ulcer patients: three consecutive trials (1995-1999).

AIM: to present our experience in eradicating Hp in three consecutive trials performed between 1995 and 1999. METHODS: 320 duodenal ulcer outpatients have been enrolled in three open, prospective controlled trials. Hp infection was confirmed by Giemsa stain and Rut. In Trial I, 52 cases received 20 mg omeprazole + 2 x 250 mg clarithromycin + 2 x 500 mg tinidazole (OCT), 48 patients were given 20 mg omeprazole, 2 x 1000 mg amoxicillin + 2 x 500 mg metronidazole (OAM) for 7 days; in Trial II, 48 cases received 40 mg pantoprazole + 2 x 1000 mg amoxicillin + 2 x 500 mg clarithromycin (PAC) for 7 days and 5l cases 2 x 400 mg ranitidin bismuth citrate + 2 x 500 mg clarithromycin for 14 days (RBC-C); in Trial III, 60 cases were treated with 2 x 30 mg lansoprazole + 2 x 250 mg clarithromycin + 2 x 500 mg metronidazole and 6l patients received 2 x 400 mg ranitidin bismuth citrate+2 x 250 mg clarithromycin + 2 x 500 mg metronidazole (RBC-CM). The patients were controlled within 4-6 weeks by endoscopy in trials I-II and 13C-urea breath test in trial III. RESULTS: Eradication rates on ITT/PP basis were: OCT: 72.3/80.2% vs OAM 51.2/63.5% (P = 0.02/P = 0.03); PAC: 80.8/88.3% vs RBC-C 80.3/85.4% (P = 0.65/0.67) and LCM 78.3/92.1% vs RBC-CM 78.7/90.5% (P = 0.86/P = 0.93). Side effects occurred in 5.2, 8.6, 9.5, 14.5, 13.5 and 18.3% of the cases. CONCLUSION: Regimens using 2 x l PPI or RBC + 2 antibiotics for l week proved to be the most effective for Hp eradication in duodenal ulcer patients.     

Impact of Quadruple Regimen of Clarithromycin Added to Metronidazole-Containing Triple Therapy Against Helicobacter pylori Infection Following Clarithromycin-Containing Triple-Therapy Failure

Background: The establishment of an optimal second-line regimen for Helicobacter pylori infection is required. Although quadruple therapy should overcome resistance to either clarithromycin or metronidazole, the effects of a quadruple regimen in second-line therapy are unknown. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of triple therapy composed of proton pump inhibitor/amoxicillin plus metronidazole with the combined additive effects of clarithromycin as a second-line quadruple therapy against H. pylori infection.
Materials and Methods: Participants were 104 patients in whom first-line therapy containing proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-clarithromycin failed. Before starting second-line therapy, patients underwent endoscopy to obtain H. pylori strain for antibiotic susceptibility tests. Patients were randomized to receive rabeprazole (10 mg), amoxicillin (750 mg), and metronidazole (250 mg), either with clarithromycin (200 mg; RAMC group) or without (RAM group); all treatments were administered twice daily for 7 days. H. pylori eradication was confirmed by ¹³C-urea breath tests performed 2 to 3 months post-therapy.
Results: As shown by intention-to-treat/per-protocol analyses, the cure rates for H. pylori infection were 88.5%/93.9% and 82.7%/84.3% for the RAMC and RAM groups. Although the study probably had an insufficient power to show a significant difference between the cure rates of the two regimens, the eradication rates showed a clear trend in favor of the RAMC group. There were no severe side-effects in any group.
Conclusions: In Japan, the RAMC regimen is thought to be a promising alternative strategy for second-line eradication of H. pylori infection.     

Comparison of amoxicillin-metronidazole plus famotidine or lansoprazole for amoxicillin-clarithromycin-proton pump inhibitor treatment failures for Helicobacter pylori infection

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitor-amoxicillin-metronidazole is recommended as second-line Helicobacter pylori therapy in Japan. The authors assessed the efficacy and safety of second-line eradication using the H2-receptor antagonist famotidine as a substitute for proton pump inhibitor. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-one patients who failed in first-line H. pylori eradication using proton pump inhibitor-clarithromycin-amoxicillin were randomly assigned to either second-line therapy including metronidazole: a 7-day course of lansoprazole 30 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg, and metronidazole 250 mg, b.i.d. (lansoprazole group); or a 7-day course of famotidine 40 mg, amoxicillin 750 mg, and metronidazole 250 mg, b.i.d. (famotidine group). Eradication was assessed for each group at least 4 weeks after completing eradication therapy. Drug susceptibility test was performed using 57 strains in pretreatment to clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin. RESULTS: Prior to second-line H. pylori eradication, the rate of resistance to clarithromycin was high at 84% (48/57). Similarly, resistance to metronidazole was low at 5.3% (3/57); however, no amoxicillin-resistant strains were found. The eradication rates for both lansoprazole and famotidine treatment groups were high at 97% (29/30) and 94% (29/31), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Famotidine treatment including metronidazole-amoxicillin as second-line therapy provided a high eradication rate similar to lansoprazole therapy. Famotidine is therefore expected to serve as a useful H. pylori eradication regimen in patients with proton pump inhibitor allergy, an economic benefit in terms of reduced health-care costs is also anticipated.     

A new modified concomitant therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Turkey

Background: Helicobacter pylori eradication rates have tended to decrease recently, mostly due to antibiotic resistance. In the present study, our aim was to determine Hp eradication rate with the LAC plus tid metronidazole regimen and the secondary objective of this study was to identify an effective regimen for our population. Methods: Eighty‐four Hp‐positive patients with non‐ulcer dyspepsia were assigned into the same group. Patients were administered the classical LAC protocole (lansoprazole 30 mg bid, amoxicillin 1 g bid and claritromycin 500 mg bid for 14 days) plus metronidazole 500 mg tid for 14 days. Gastroscopy and histopathological assessment were performed before enrollment and C¹⁴ urea breath test and stool antigen test were performed 6 weeks after treatment. Results: All 84 patients completed the study. No patient left the study because of drug side effect. Total eradication rate was 75% (63/84). Conclusion: Although LAC plus tid metronidazole regimen achieved a much better eradication rate compared with the standard LAC regimen; this is the first study that has a relatively low success with a concomitant therapy. So in areas of high resistance like Turkey, one cannot expect a high success with any clarithromycin containing regimen and those should be avoided.     

Pantoprazole suppresses Helicobacter pylori without affecting cure

Background. Short-term, low-dose triple regimens composed of proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) and two antibiotics are the current gold standard therapy for cure of Helicobacter pylori infection. To date, the effect of PPI pretreatment on eradication outcome is not known. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of pretreatment with pantoprazole on the efficacy of an ensuing triple therapy.
Methods. In this open, randomized, monocenter, parallel group comparison, 107 patients with duodenal ulcer or functional dyspepsia were assigned to receive one of the following treatment regimens: a 7-day triple therapy with pantoprazole, 40 mg bid; clarithromycin, 250 mg bid; and metronidazole, 400 mg bid, which was either preceded or followed by a 7-day therapy with pantoprazole, 40 mg (P-PCM or PCM-P). Assessment of H. pylori status was performed by a biopsy urease test and ¹³C urea breath test at the initial visit and ¹³C urea breath test at all follow-up visits.
Results. The 7-day pantoprazole pretreatment resulted in a significant decline of the δ values of the ¹³C urea breath test. H. pylori infection was cured in 47 of 52 intention-to-treat patients of the P-PCM group (90%; 95% confidence interval, 79–97%) and in 46 of 53 of the PCM-P group (87%; 95% confidence interval, 75–95%).
Conclusions. Pretreatment with pantoprazole suppresses H. pylori but does not impair the efficacy of a consecutive short-term, low-dose triple therapy.     

Efficacy of metronidazole as second-line drug for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection in the Japanese population: a multicenter study in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area

BACKGROUND: With the increase in the frequency of clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), there is rising concern about the decline of the eradication rate of this infection following treatment. The Tokyo Hp Study Group examined the eradication rate in response to a second-line regimen consisting of proton pump inhibitor (PPI), amoxicillin, and metronidazole by conducting a multicenter study in the Tokyo Metropolitan Area. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred and twenty-eight patients with H. pylori infection, in whom the first-line therapy with a PPI, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin administered for 1 week had failed to eradicate the infection, were enrolled in this study. These cases were randomly assigned to one of the two second-line regimens containing metronidazole (PPI/AM500 or PPI/AM750) administered for 1 week. 13C-urea breath test was performed as a diagnostic method test for H. pylori infection not earlier than 8 weeks after the second-line therapy. RESULTS: Intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses revealed an eradication rate of 87.6 and 90.6%, respectively, following PPI/AM500 treatment, and 86.9 and 88.6%, respectively, following PPI/AM750 treatment. Neither analysis revealed any significant difference in the eradication rate between PPI/AM500 and PPI/AM750 (p = .876 and .621, respectively). According to ITT and PP analyses, the eradication rates following treatment with PPI/AM500 were 85.2 and 88.5% with the use of lansoprazole, 62.5 and 62.5% with the use of omeprazole, and 93.2 and 96.5% with the use of rabeprazole, respectively. There was a significant difference in the eradication rates between PPI (omeprazole)/AM500 and PPI (rabeprazole)/AM500. In the case of PPI/AM750, the corresponding eradication rates were 84.8 and 87.0% with the use of lansoprazole, 92.9 and 92.9% with the use of omeprazole, and 92.9 and 92.9% with the use of rabeprazole, respectively. There were no significant differences in the eradication rates obtained with the use of the three PPIs. CONCLUSIONS: Both PPI/AM500 and PPI/AM750 administered for 1 week appeared to be highly effective second-line regimens for the treatment of H. pylori infection in Japanese patients. From the viewpoint of adverse events, PPI/AM500 appeared to be safe compared with PPI/AM750.     

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori resistance to metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and furazolidone in Brazil

Background. Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with a wide range of digestive diseases and is very prevalent in developing countries, although few data exist on the susceptibility of H. pylori to antimicrobials commonly used in eradication schedules in these countries. The aim of this study was to evaluate the resistance of H. pylori to metronidazole, clarithromycin, amoxicillin, tetracycline, and furazolidone in dyspeptic Brazilian patients.
Material and Methods. Ninety consecutive H. pylori –positive patients were enrolled. Resistance was evaluated by an agar dilution test.
Results. Resistance to metronidazole was detected in 38 patients (42%); to amoxicillin in 26 individuals (29%); to clarithromycin in 6 patients (7%); to tetracycline in 6 patients (7%); and to furazolidone in 4 individuals (4%). Thirteen strains were resistant to two agents, and eight strains were resistant to three antimicrobials.
Conclusions. These results confirm the need for culture and susceptibility testing to define H. pylori resistance patterns in particular geographical areas before the general use of an eradication schedule. They also suggest the possibility of resistance to such antimicrobials as amoxicillin or tetracycline in geographical areas with a high prevalence of H. pylori infection and still not fully evaluated for antimicrobial susceptibility.     

Double-Blind, Multicenter Evaluation of Lansoprazole and Amoxicillin Dual Therapy for the Cure of Helicobacter pylori Infection

Background Treatment with amoxicillin plus omeprazole results in disappointing cure rates of Helicobacter pylori infection. The minimal inhibitory concentration of lansoprazole for H. pylori in vitro is lower than that for omeprazole, prompting interest in treatment with amoxicillin plus lansoprazole.
Materials and Methods. H. pylori -infected patients with endoscopically documented duodenal ulcer either currently or within the past year were randomized to 14 days of (1) lansoprazole, 30 mg bid, plus amoxicillin, 1 gm tid; (2) lansoprazole, 30 mg tid, plus amoxicillin, 1 gm tid; (3) lansoprazole, 30 mg tid alone; or (4) amoxicillin, 1 gm tid alone. Endoscopy was done at enrollment and at 4 to 6 weeks after completion of treatment or for recurrent symptoms. H. pylori status was assessed by culture and histology. Ulcer prevalence was evaluated at follow-up endoscopy.
Results. Two hundred sixty-two patients met enrollment criteria and were treated. By per-protocol analysis, H. pylori infection was cured in 57% of those treated with lansoprazole twice daily plus amoxicillin and in 67% of those treated with lansoprazole three times daily plus amoxicillin, compared with 0% treated with lansoprazole alone or amoxicillin alone ( p < .001 for dual therapy versus either monotherapy). Amoxicillin resistance was not observed. At follow-up endoscopy, ulcer prevalence was 17% in patients treated with lansoprazole twice daily plus amoxicillin, 23% in those treated with lansoprazole three times daily plus amoxicillin, 33% in those treated with lansoprazole alone, and 35% in those treated with amoxicillin alone ( p = .024; lansoprazole twice daily plus amoxicillin versus amoxicillin alone).
Conclusions. Treatment with amoxicillin plus lansoprazole, 30 mg tid, led to cure of H. pylori infection in 67% of patients with active or recently healed duodenal ulcer.     

Effect of Smoking and Histological Gastritis Severity on the Rate of H. pylori Eradication with Omeprazole, Amoxicillin, and Clarithromycin

Background. The combination of omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is a common regimen against Helicobacter pylori. Several recent studies have shown that smoking, high intragastric acidity, and the degree of histological gastritis are associated with H. pylori eradication failure.
Materials and Methods. One hundred and thirty-seven H. pylori –positive patients were treated with a 1-week regimen composed of omeprazole, 20 mg once daily; amoxicillin, 500 mg; and clarithromycin, 200 mg thrice daily. Success of the treatment was evaluated by histology and the ¹³C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after completion of therapy. Data about age, gender, alcohol intake, smoking habits, and previous proton pump inhibitor intake were collected in patient interviews. We evaluated fasting gastric pH and the degree of histological gastritis before eradication of H. pylori.
Results. The overall eradication of H. pylori at 4 weeks was successful in 98 of 137 patients (72%). On the multivariate analysis, a low grade of inflammation in the antrum ( p ≤ .01; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.34–16.75), low grade of activity in the fundus ( p ≤ .05; 95% CI, 1.31–9.65), and smoking ( p ≤ .05; 95% CI, 1.27–6.82) were the significant independent factors predicting treatment failure.
Conclusions. These findings indicate that H. pylori eradication therapy with omeprazole, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin is less effective in patients who smoke and more effective in patients with high scores of antral inflammation and fundal activity at baseline biopsy.     

Comparative study of Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of twice-versus four-times-daily amoxicillin administered with proton pump inhibitor and clarithromycin: a randomized study

Background: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-containing triple therapy with clarithromycin and amoxicillin is now a standard regimen for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Korea. Amoxicillin has time-dependent bactericidal activity against H. pylori ; we therefore assumed a dosing schedule of amoxicillin would affect the eradication rate of H. pylori . The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare the efficacy of different amoxicillin dosing schedules for the eradication of H. pylori .
Materials and Methods: One hundred and eighty-six patients with H. pylori infection were eligible for this study. Patients were randomly assigned to one of two regimens: amoxicillin 1000 mg with clarithromycin 500 mg and omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks (BID group, n = 93), or amoxicillin 500 mg four times daily with clarithromycin 500 mg and omeprazole 20 mg twice daily for 2 weeks (QID group, n = 93). The success of H. pylori eradication was evaluated 4–5 weeks after completing treatment.
Results: Overall eradication rate was 90.3%, and eradication rates were 91.4% in the BID group and 89.2% in the QID group ( p  = 0.62). Compliances was 95.7% in the BID group and 93.5% in the QID group ( p  = 0.516); this was the only factor that significantly affected H. pylori eradication in this study. Side effects in both groups were generally mild.
Conclusions: Amoxicillin regimens with PPI and clarithromycin are found to be equally effective and safe in both the BID and QID groups for H. pylori eradication. Therefore, considering patient's comfort, we recommend a twice daily amoxicillin regimen.     

以雷贝拉唑、左氧氟沙星为基础的三联补救疗法的临床观察

目的:观察以雷贝拉唑、左氧氟沙星为基础的三联疗法对幽门螺杆菌根除失败的补救疗法的临床疗效.方法:幽门螺杆菌根除失败的患者50例,予雷贝拉唑20mg,阿莫西林1.0,一天两次;左氧氟沙星0.5,一天一次;口服一周.停药1个月后行13C呼气试验检测来判断幽门螺杆菌根除率.结果:49例完成了整个研究过程,意向处理分析(ITT)根除率为82.00％,完成治疗分析(PP)根除率为83.67％,总的副作用发生率为12.00％,症状缓解率95.92％.结论:以雷贝拉唑、左氧氟沙星为基础的短程三联疗法对根治失败的幽门螺旋杆菌感染患者是一种安全、有效的治疗方案.     

Pretreatment Antibiotic Resistance in Helicobacter pylori Infection: Results of Three Randomized Controlled Studies

Background. Although combinations of antibiotics and antisecretory drugs are useful for treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, treatment failure is common. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relation between pretreatment antibiotic resistance and outcome by using six different treatment regimens for H. pylori infection. Patients and Methods. Three hundred sixty-nine consecutive H. pylori–infected patients with dyspeptic symptoms were enrolled in three consecutive randomized, controlled, single-center clinical trials: trial A, 128 patients; trial B, 125 patients; trial C, 116 patients. Treatments consisted of (A) a 15-day course of dual therapy (omeprazole, 20 mg bid, and amoxicillin, 1 gm bid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg tid) (OA vs OC); (B) a 7-day triple therapy of omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus metronidazole, 500 mg bid, and amoxicillin, 1,000 mg bid, or clarithromycin, 500 mg tid (OMA vs OMC); or (C) omeprazole, 20 mg bid, plus metronidazole, 500 mg bid, plus tetracycline, 500 mg qid, or doxycycline, 100 mg tid (OMT vs OMD). Diagnostic endoscopy was made in all patients before and 5 to 6 weeks after therapy. Six biopsies were taken from each patient for histology, rapid urease test, and H. pylori culture; antibiotic susceptibility testing was performed using the E-test method. Results. Overall cure rates were poor for both dual therapies OA and OC (38% and 37%, respectively) and for triple therapies OMA, OMC, and OMD (57%, 55%, and 58%, respectively). The OMT combination was successful in 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 80.4%–97%). Metronidazole resistance was present in 29.7% (95% CI, 24%–35%), amoxicillin resistance was present in 26% (95% CI, 21%–32%), clarithromycin resistance was present in 23.1% (95% CI, 18%–29%), tetracycline resistance was present in 14% (95% CI, 10%–20%), and doxycycline resistance was present in 33.3% (95% CI, 21%–47%). Antibiotic resistance markedly reduced the cure rates and accounted for most of the poor results with the triple therapies: 89% versus 23%; 77% versus 26%; 100% versus 60%; and 67% versus 23% for OMC, OMA, OMT, and OMD, respectively. OMT appeared to be the best because of the high success rate with metronidazole-resistant H. pylori (71%) and in low-level tetracycline resistance. Conclusions. Pretreatment antibiotic-resistant H. pylori can, in part, explain the low cure rate of the infection and the variability in outcome in reported trials.