Mobilization of HIV Spread by Diaphanous 2 Dependent Filopodia in Infected Dendritic Cells

Paramount to the success of persistent viral infection is the ability of viruses to navigate hostile environments en route to future targets. In response to such obstacles, many viruses have developed the ability of establishing actin rich-membrane bridges to aid in future infections. Herein through dynamic imaging of HIV infected dendritic cells, we have observed how viral high-jacking of the actin/membrane network facilitates one of the most efficient forms of HIV spread. Within infected DC, viral egress is coupled to viral filopodia formation, with more than 90% of filopodia bearing immature HIV on their tips at extensions of 10 to 20 µm. Live imaging showed HIV filopodia routinely pivoting at their base, and projecting HIV virions at µm.sec⁻¹ along repetitive arc trajectories. HIV filopodial dynamics lead to up to 800 DC to CD4 T cell contacts per hour, with selection of T cells culminating in multiple filopodia tethering and converging to envelope the CD4 T-cell membrane with budding HIV particles. Long viral filopodial formation was dependent on the formin diaphanous 2 (Diaph2), and not a dominant Arp2/3 filopodial pathway often associated with pathogenic actin polymerization. Manipulation of HIV Nef reduced HIV transfer 25-fold by reducing viral filopodia frequency, supporting the potency of DC HIV transfer was dependent on viral filopodia abundance. Thus our observations show HIV corrupts DC to CD4 T cell interactions by physically embedding at the leading edge contacts of long DC filopodial networks.     

A Highlights from MBoC Selection: Cell type–dependent mechanisms for formin-mediated assembly of filopodia

Filopodia are finger-like protrusions from the plasma membrane and are of fundamental importance to cellular physiology, but the mechanisms governing their assembly are still in question. One model, called convergent elongation, proposes that filopodia arise from Arp2/3 complex–nucleated dendritic actin networks, with factors such as formins elongating these filaments into filopodia. We test this model using constitutively active constructs of two formins, FMNL3 and mDia2. Surprisingly, filopodial assembly requirements differ between suspension and adherent cells. In suspension cells, Arp2/3 complex is required for filopodial assembly through either formin. In contrast, a subset of filopodia remains after Arp2/3 complex inhibition in adherent cells. In adherent cells only, mDia1 and VASP also contribute to filopodial assembly, and filopodia are disproportionately associated with focal adhesions. We propose an extension of the existing models for filopodial assembly in which any cluster of actin filament barbed ends in proximity to the plasma membrane, either Arp2/3 complex dependent or independent, can initiate filopodial assembly by specific formins.     

Characterization of EVL-I as a protein kinase D substrate

EVL-I is a splice variant of EVL (Ena/VASP like protein), whose in vivo function and regulation are still poorly understood. We found that Protein Kinase D (PKD) interacts in vitro and in vivo with EVL-I and phosphorylates EVL-I in a 21 amino acid alternately-included insert in the EVH2 domain. Following knockdown of the capping protein CPβ and spreading on laminin, phosphorylated EVL-I can support filopodia formation and the phosphorylated EVL-I is localized at filopodial tips. Furthermore, we found that the lamellipodial localization of EVL-I is unaffected by phosphorylation, but that impairment of EVL-I phosphorylation is associated with ruffling of lamellipodia upon PDBu stimulation. Besides the lamellipodial and filopodial localization of phosphorylated EVL-I in fibroblasts, we determined that EVL-I is hyperphosphorylated and localized in the cell–cell contacts of certain breast cancer cells and mouse embryo keratinocytes. Taken together, our results show that phosphorylated EVL-I is present in lamellipodia, filopodia and cell–cell contacts and suggest the existence of signaling pathways that may affect EVL-I via phosphorylation of its EVH2 domain.     

Cell adhesion during gastrulation : A new approach

In gastrulating sea urchin embryos, secondary mesenchyme cells at the tip of the advancing archenteron extend long narrow filopodia which probe the inner surface of the blastocoele wall, rejecting some surface contacts before adhering to other cells. After specific cell adhesions are made, contractions of the filopodia pull the leading tip of the archenteron to the opposite wall of the blastocoele with an accompanying elongation of the archenteron. A study was made of the biochemistry and morphology of the specific adhesions of filopodial extensions by injecting a variety of compounds into the blastocoele of living sea urchin gastrulae and observing their effects on filopodia and cell movements. A number of agents (proteases, lectins) caused specific filopodial detachment and subsequent archenteron regression. Fluorescein-conjugated lectins, including concanavalin A (conA) and wheat germ agglutinin (WGA) exhibited marked specificity of cell surface binding to specific regions (primary mesenchyme cells, blastocoele wall, etc.) of the embryo.     

Arp2/3 complex activity in filopodia of spreading cells

Background  

Cells use filopodia to explore their environment and to form new adhesion contacts for motility and spreading. The Arp2/3 complex has been implicated in lamellipodial actin assembly as a major nucleator of new actin filaments in branched networks. The interplay between filopodial and lamellipodial protrusions is an area of much interest as it is thought to be a key determinant of how cells make motility choices.     

Guidance of pioneer growth cones: Filopodial contacts and coupling revealed with an antibody to Lucifer Yellow

We are interested in the factors that guide individual neuronal growth cones during embryonic development. We have developed an antibody to the fluorescent dye Lucifer Yellow. We use the antibody here to examine the specific filopodial contacts and dye coupling by the first growth cones in the grasshopper embryo that navigate in an axonless environment. We have studied the distribution and apparent selective adhesion of the filopodia from these pioneering growth cones in the central nervous system and periphery. Our results suggest that selective filopodial adhesion to specific “landmark” cells may play an important role in the guidance of pioneer growth cones.     

Capping protein is essential for cell migration in vivo and for filopodial morphology and dynamics

Capping protein (CP) binds to barbed ends of growing actin filaments and inhibits elongation. CP is essential for actin-based motility in cell-free systems and in Dictyostelium. Even though CP is believed to be critical for creating the lamellipodial actin structure necessary for protrusion and migration, CP''s role in mammalian cell migration has not been directly tested. Moreover, recent studies have suggested that structures besides lamellipodia, including lamella and filopodia, may have unappreciated roles in cell migration. CP has been postulated to be absent from filopodia, and thus its role in filopodial activity has remained unexplored. We report that silencing CP in both cultured mammalian B16F10 cells and in neurons of developing neocortex impaired cell migration. Moreover, we unexpectedly observed that low levels of CP were detectable in the majority of filopodia. CP depletion decreased filopodial length, altered filopodial shape, and reduced filopodial dynamics. Our results support an expansion of the potential roles that CP plays in cell motility by implicating CP in filopodia as well as in lamellipodia, both of which are important for locomotion in many types of migrating cells.     

Filopodial focal complexes direct adhesion and force generation towards filopodia outgrowth

Filopodia are key structures within many cells that serve as sensors constantly probing the local environment. Although filopodia are involved in a number of different cellular processes, their function in migration is often analyzed with special focus on early processes of filopodia formation and the elucidation of filopodia molecular architecture. An increasing number of publications now describe the entire life cycle of filopodia, with analyses from the initial establishment of stable filopodium-substrate adhesion to their final integration into the approaching lamellipodium. We and others can now show the structural and functional dependence of lamellipodial focal adhesions as well as of force generation and transmission on filopodial focal complexes and filopodial actin bundles. These results were made possible by new high resolution imaging techniques as well as by recently developed elastomeric substrates and theoretical models. The data additionally provide strong evidence that formation of new filopodia depends on previously existing filopodia through a repetitive filopodial elongation of the stably adhered filopodial tips. In this commentary we therefore hypothesize a highly coordinated mechanism that regulates filopodia formation, adhesion, protein composition and force generation in a filopodia dependent step by step process.Key words: filopodia, focal adhesion, cell force, filopodial focal complex, actinCell protrusion depends on collaborative interactions of lamellipodia and filopodia.¹ Although filopodia cannot drive cell migration alone, in contrast to lamellipodia, they are essential for many cell biological functions such as guidance of neuronal growth cones² or during angiogenesis.³ Furthermore, filopodia are vital to cell-cell contact establishment as described for epithelial cells⁴ or during dorsal closure in Drosophila,⁵ and are also implicated in cancer cell metastasis.^6,7 Lamellipodia as well as filopodia can be formed independently from each other,⁸ and recent results implicate independent basic mechanisms of cytoskeletal regulation for their formation. While lamellipodia protrusion is a well accepted Arp2/3-dependent process where actin branches constantly form the protrusive force at the leading edge of the lamella,⁹ the details of filopodia formation are far from being understood.^10–13 Although earlier experiments indicated Arp2/3 was also involved in filopodia formation,¹⁴ recent results point to a machinery that is far less dependent, or even possibly independent, of Arp2/3 with formins being the central regulating molecules instead.⁸As soon as filopodia start to form, they constantly sense their environment upon elongation. Transmembrane proteins such as cadherins or integrins^15,16 connect filopodia to surrounding cells, extracellular matrix, or even pathogens to form stable contacts. When filopodial adhesion fails, retraction takes place.¹⁷ Although integrins and talin have been shown to be initially present at these sites in an un-clustered but active state, many additional adhesion proteins take part in filopodial focal complexes (filopodial FXs).^16,18 Starting from a small VASP-containing adhesion spot at the tip of filopodia, proteins such as vinculin, paxillin, talin, tensin and even zyxin form an elongated filopodial FX behind the VASP spot along the filopodium. While integrin as well as VASP transport along the filopodia shaft via myosin-X has been described,¹⁹ it is still unclear whether additional adhesion proteins are also actively transported or whether diffusion takes place. Diffusion is typically a non-limiting process during cytoplasmic protein complex formation. However for filopodia, diffusion could have an important regulatory function as already hypothesized in theoretical models,²⁰ because they are small in width and densely filled with actin filaments. Therefore, local concentrations of soluble adhesion molecules might drop within filopodia upon FX formation resulting in a pure physical regulation of filopodial length as well as filopodial FX size.The almost complete focal adhesion site specific protein inventory of filopodia FXs^16,18 as indicated above provided further indications for a dependency of lamellipodial focal adhesions (FAs) on filopodial FXs. This hypothesis was confirmed using fluorescent live cell imaging to identify the transition of filopodial FXs into fully assembled FAs upon FX contact with the leading edge of the lamellipodium. While filopodial FXs were responsible for only a sub-fraction of FAs in fish fibroblasts,¹⁸ stable FAs of human keratinocytes were formed almost exclusively by enlargement of existing filopodial FXs¹⁶ (see scheme, Fig. 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1Filopodia determine the fate of lamellipodial structures. Filopodia are formed by actin polymerization at their tip. Upon stable adhesion, a small but fully assembled filopodial focal complex (FX) is formed. This FX becomes enlarged in size upon lamellipodial contact to form focal adhesions. In parallel, the filopodial actin cross-linker fascin becomes exchanged by palladin and α-actinin as soon as the filopodial actin bundles are incorporated into the lamellipodium. In a next step, α-actinin becomes partially exchanged by myosin II, leading to enhanced force values applied at filopodial-originated FA sites bound to the substrate. The tight interaction between FAs and filopodial actin bundles reduces the actin retrograde flow within the filopodium in front of the FA (lower inlay) compared to filopodia lacking stable FAs in the lamellipodium (not shown). Adhesion sites formed in the lamellipodium lack connections to distinct actin bundles leading to low force application at these sites and short lifetimes (upper inlay).The structural dependency of lamellipodial complexes on filopodial protein aggregates could be also shown for actin bundles. Here, parallel oriented actin filaments become cross-linked by proteins such as fascin or IRSp53-Eps8-complex upon filopodia formation.^21,22 These tightly packed bundles of 15–30 single actin filaments originate from the lamellipodial actin meshwork.²³ Interestingly, filopodial actin bundles in turn also affect lamellipodial actin structures independent of whether the filopodium adheres in a stable manner or looses contact. Nemethova et al.¹⁸ described the contribution of non-adhering filopodia to the construction of concave bundles of actin filaments within the lamellipodium of fish fibroblasts. These bundles often extended in length and interconnected with adjacent bundles. Similar observations were found for fibroblasts of chicken embryos and neuronal growth cones.^24,25 Here, filopodial actin bundles were clearly shown to be the origin of nearly 85% of all actin bundles found in the lamella. These actin filaments typically pointed towards the direction of migration. Additionally, myosin II was associated with these filopodial derived actin filaments to form polarized actin bundles. Of equal importance are findings presented by Schäfer et al. in this issue. The authors analyzed the fate of stably adhered filopodia and identified a stepwise exchange of filopodial fascin against the actin cross-linker proteins palladin and especially α-actinin in areas where filopodia were just overgrown by the lamellipodial leading edge (schematically presented in Fig. 1). α-Actinin further induced incorporation of myosin II into filopodial actin bundles in the lamellipodium. The authors additionally found that FAs displayed an enhanced lifetime when adhered to these myosin containing actin filaments. Therefore, these findings could also explain the unusual stability of filopodial actin filaments in neuronal growth cones observed by Mallavarapu and Mitchison.¹⁷ For keratinocytes, filopodia-dependent actin bundles are the only myosin containing actin structures oriented in the direction of movement within the lamellipodium and the lamella. Sensitivity and resolution improvements in cell force analyses further proved that these actin bundles were responsible for almost the entire force transmitted from the lamellipodium of migrating keratinocytes to the substrate. These forces were transferred at FA sites emerging from filopodial FXs, proving the importance of filopodia in lamellipodial structures and functions. Although filopodia-independent adhesion sites are also formed in keratinocytes right behind the leading edge, these sites are neither connected to detectable actin filament bundles nor do they transmit significant forces (see scheme, Fig. 1). Consequently, their sizes and life spans are strongly reduced (Schäfer et al., this issue).Recent results in keratinocytes additionally close the circle from stably adhered filopodia to the generation of new ones. Our original observations indicated that new filopodia were mainly formed in a direct extension of focal adhesions. Since these adhesion sites also depended on previously adhered filopodial FXs, a closer look revealed a consecutive outgrowth of the same filopodia.¹⁶ These cycles were only interrupted when outgrowing filopodia did not adhere in a stable manner between outgrowth cycles. Present results suggest that the same tip complex is present in all subsequently formed filopodia with a VASP tip signal remaining in place during successive filopodial elongations. As a result, well aligned, consecutive elongated focal adhesions can be found in keratinocytes. We can only speculate whether such an Arp2/3-independent mechanism describes a basic principle in filopodia formation at this point, but similar results have been observed for fish fibroblasts with a repetitive and alternating transition between filopodia and microspikes as filopodia-like structures barely extending over the lamellipodial leading edge.¹⁸The strong interdependency between lamellipodial FAs and stably adhered filopodia is also highlighted by actin retrograde flow analyses in keratinocytes (Schäfer et al. this issue). Retrograde actin flow is generated by actin polymerization at the cell front and myosin activity pulling the filaments rearwards. The interaction of actin with FAs is known to dampen flow rates in front of lamellipodial FAs.²⁶ Furthermore, filamentous-actin dynamics measured in lung epithelial cells showed a fast retrograde actin flow at the leading edge compared to rates within the lamellae. The highest flow rates were in the range of 0.3–0.5 µm/min.²⁷ Interestingly, keratocytes exhibited ten times slower flow rates at the leading edge,²⁸ indicating that retrograde flow strongly depends on the cell type analyzed. Actin filaments polymerizing at the tips of filopodia also undergo retrograde flow, but these flow rates are much faster compared to those found in lamellipodia,²⁴ as shown by bleaching experiments in chick embryo fibroblasts with flow rates approximately two-fold faster in filaments derived from filopodia compared to flow rates measured within the lamellipodium. These flow rates of approximately 1.3 µm/min were similar to those found for filopodia in other studies.²² Furthermore, we could show that this retrograde flow rate strongly depends on stable FAs formed behind the filopodium (Schäfer et al. this issue and Fig. 1). In the absence of these FAs, actin retrograde flow is doubled once more to rates of approximately 2.5 µm/min in filopodia. Therefore, although rates of FAs containing filopodia are still much higher than those found in lamellipodia, these rates are still slowed down indicating an effective connection between FAs and filopodial actin. These results further imply that myosin II incorporation into filopodial-originated actin bundles is responsible for enhanced retrograde flow rates in filopodia compared to rates found in the lamellipodium and that myosin II incorporation does not depend on stably adhered FAs directly behind filopodia. These data also strongly support the hypothesis that new filopodia form in front of stable lamellipodial FAs. It will be an intriguing question for future studies to analyze whether the reduced retrograde flow speeds in front of lamellipodial FAs might even be a prerequisite for efficient assembly and stable adhesion of small filopodial FXs, or perhaps even for filopodia formation in general.Taking into account all the currently known functions of filopodia, the presented results finally indicate that filopodia might be characterized best not only by one but actually two main functions. The first function is environmental sensing. Various transmembrane proteins can be involved leading to various roles for filopodia such as formation of cell-cell or cell-matrix interactions.^5,15 Although these functions in environmental sensing seem to be highly diverse, force generation along filopodial-originated actin bundles as the second function for filopodia might be of universal importance independent of the cell type that forms them. Force transmission along cell-pathogen interacting filopodia have been observed,²⁹ and the formation of adherens junctions after filopodia mediated cell-cell interaction is also a cell force dependent process.⁵ Therefore, these observations fit well to the currently presented data by Schäfer et al. (this issue) proving the importance of filopodia-dependent cell matrix interactions in cell force generation in the direction of migration (see scheme, Fig. 1).Present in almost every moving cell type, filopodia are therefore much more than just sensors for environmental conditions. In fact, these needle-like structures are the starting point for essential structures of adhesion and movement. Independent of whether they adhere stably or not, filopodia define the position of cellular adhesion sites, actin bundles, cell force generation and application, and, finally, the new filopodia to be formed.     

One step ahead: Role of filopodia in adhesion formation during cell migration of keratinocytes

Cell adhesion is an essential prerequisite for cell function and movement. It depends strongly on focal adhesion complexes connecting the extracellular matrix to the actin cytoskeleton. Especially in moving cells focal adhesions are highly dynamic and believed to be formed closely behind the leading edge. Filopodia were thought to act mainly as guiding cues using their tip complexes for elongation. Here we show for keratinocytes a strong dependence of lamellipodial adhesion sites on filopodia. Upon stable contact of the VASP-containing tip spot to the substrate, a filopodial focal complex (filopodial FX) is formed right behind along the filopodia axis. These filopodial FXs are fully assembled, yet small adhesions containing all adhesion markers tested. Filopodial FXs when reached by the lamellipodium are just increased in size resulting in classical focal adhesions. At the same time most filopodia regain their elongation ability. Blocking filopodia inhibits development of new focal adhesions in the lamellipodium, while focal adhesion maturation in terms of vinculin exchange dynamics remains active. Our data therefore argue for a strong spatial and temporal dependence of focal adhesions on filopodial focal complexes in keratinocytes with filopodia not permanently initiated via new clustering of actin filaments to induce elongation.     

A requirement for filopodia in the adhesion of pre-aggregative cells of Dictyostelium discoideum

The adhesion of pre-aggregative cells of Dictyostelium discoideum was found to be partly dependent upon the integrity of filopodial extensions of the cells. Removal of filopodia by cytochalasin B (CB) results in reduced adhesiveness in stationary phase cells. The relationship between filopodia and cell adhesion is discussed.     

The filopodium: A stable structure with highly regulated repetitive cycles of elongation and persistence depending on the actin cross-linker fascin

The ability of mammalian cells to adhere and to migrate is an essential prerequisite to form higher organisms. Early migratory events include substrate sensing, adhesion formation, actin bundle assembly and force generation. Latest research revealed that filopodia are important not only for sensing the substrate but for all of the aforementioned highly regulated processes. However, the exact regulatory mechanisms are still barely understood. Here, we demonstrate that filopodia of human keratinocytes exhibit distinct cycles of repetitive elongation and persistence. A single filopodium thereby is able to initiate the formation of several stable adhesions. Every single filopodial cycle is characterized by an elongation phase, followed by a stabilization time and in many cases a persistence phase. The whole process is strongly connected to the velocity of the lamellipodial leading edge, characterized by a similar phase behavior with a slight time shift compared with filopodia and a different velocity. Most importantly, re-growth of existing filopodia is induced at a sharply defined distance between the filopodial tip and the lamellipodial leading edge. On the molecular level this regrowth is preceded by a strong filopodial reduction of the actin bundling protein fascin. This reduction is achieved by a switch to actin polymerization without fascin incorporation at the filopodial tip and therefore subsequent out-transport of the cross-linker by actin retrograde flow.Key words: filopodia, lamellipodia, cell migration, fascin, adhesion, retrograde flow, actin polymerization     

The key feature for early migratory processes: Dependence of adhesion,actin bundles,force generation and transmission on filopodia

Migration of cells is one of the most essential prerequisites to form higher organisms and depends on a strongly coordinated sequence of processes. Early migratory events include substrate sensing, adhesion formation, actin bundle assembly and force generation. While substrate sensing was ascribed to filopodia, all other processes were believed to depend mainly on lamellipodia of migrating cells. In this work we show for motile keratinocytes that all processes from substrate sensing to force generation strongly depend on filopodial focal complexes as well as on filopodial actin bundles. In a coordinated step by step process, filopodial focal complexes have to be tightly adhered to the substrate and to filopodial actin bundles to enlarge upon lamellipodial contact forming classical focal adhesions. Lamellipodial actin filaments attached to those focal adhesions originate from filopodia. Upon cell progression, the incorporation of filopodial actin bundles into the lamellipodium goes along with a complete change in actin cross-linker composition from filopodial fascin to lamellipodial α-actinin. α-Actinin in turn is replaced by myosin II and becomes incorporated directly behind the leading edge. Myosin II activity makes this class of actin bundles with their attached FAs the major source of force generation and transmission at the cell front. Furthermore, connection of FAs to force generating actin bundles leads to their stabilization and further enlargement. Consequently, adhesion sites formed independently of filopodia are not connected to detectable actin bundles, transmit weak forces to the substrate and disassemble within a few minutes without having been increased in size.Key words: filopodia, focal complexes, cell migration, focal adhesion, myosin II, force, actin flow, maturation     

Filopodial focal complexes direct adhesion and force generation towards filopodia outgrowth

Filopodia are key structures within many cells that serve as sensors constantly probing the local environment. Although filopodia are involved in a number of different cellular processes, their function in migration is often analyzed with special focus on early processes of filopodia formation and the elucidation of filopodia molecular architecture. An increasing number of publications now describe the entire life cycle of filopodia, with analyses from the initial establishment of stable filopodium-substrate adhesion to their final integration into the approaching lamellipodium. We and others can now show the structural and functional dependence of lamellipodial focal adhesions as well as of force generation and transmission on filopodial focal complexes and filopodial actin bundles. These results were made possible by new high resolution imaging techniques as well as by recently developed elastomeric substrates and theoretical models. The data additionally provide strong evidence that formation of new filopodia depends on previously existing filopodia through a repetitive filopodial elongation of the stably adhered filopodial tips. In this commentary we therefore hypothesize a highly coordinated mechanism that regulates filopodia formation, adhesion, protein composition and force generation in a filopodia dependent step by step process.     

The induction of filopodia in the cellular slime mold Dictyostelium discoideum by cyclic adenosine monophosphate: mechanism of aggregation.

Dictyostelium discoideum vegetative amoebae grown axenically can be induced to extend microprojections, filopodia, in response to cyclic 3′,5′-adenosine monophosphate. Cyclic 3′-5′-guanosine monophosphate, adenosine monophosphate, or adenosine diphosphate at concentrations of 1.0 mm have no effect. After incubation for 15 min, 1.0 mM adenosine triphosphate will also cause filopodial formation. Treatment with 0.1 mM 2–4 dinitrophenol or 1.0 mM sodium azide does not prevent the induction by cyclic adenosine monophosphate. The induced cells can be more extensively agglutinated with Concanavalin A at 0.5 mg/ml than noninduced cells. A model is presented that describes a possible mechanism whereby cells may aggregate via the cyclic adenosine monophosphate induced filopodia.     

Scanning electron microscopy of aggregating embryonic neural retina cells.

Scanning electron microscopy of in vitro reaggregation of trypsin-dissociated neural retina cells from 10-day chick embryos revealed that filopodial projections participate in the assembly of the dispersed cells into clusters. Freshly dissociated cells displayed numerous elongated, randomly projecting filopodia. With the onset of cell reaggregation these filopodia bridged and connected distant cells becoming shorter as the cells came together and formed aggregates. In 24-h cell aggregates only short microvilli were seen, mostly on cell surfaces facing the periphery of the aggregate. Cells dissociated from retina tissue pre-treated with inhibitors of protein synthesis, or cells exposed to these inhibitors immediately after dissociation were mostly devoid of filopodial projections; such cells failed to re-aggregate histotypically. Thus, metabolic and biosynthetic processes are required for the changes in the cell periphery which result in formation or maintenance of filopodia, and which enable trypsin-dissociated cells to reform histotypic associations. Possible relationships between the formation of filopodia and histotypic reaggregation of cells is discussed.     

Characterization of an extremely motile cellular network in the rotifer Asplanchna spp.

The pseudocoelomic body cavity of the rotifer Asplanchna spp. contains free cells that form a highly dynamic, three-dimensional polygonal network of filopodia. Using video-enhanced differential interference contrast microscopy, we have qualitatively and quantitatively characterized the motion types involved with network motility: (1) filopodial junctions are displaced laterally at 10.52 +/- 0.46 microns/s; (2) free-ending filopodia form and extend at rates of 8.77 +/- 0.40 microns/s, until they retract again at 7.23 +/- 0.87 microns/s; (3) filopodial strands fuse either laterally or tip to the lateral side. The combination of these motion types results in enlargements, diminutions, and extinctions of filopodial polygons, and in the formation of new polygons. Moreover, there is intense and fast (5.11 +/- 0.28 microns/s) particle transport within the filopodial strands. The organization of the cytoskeleton in filopodia was examined by electron microscopy and by labeling with fluorescent-tagged phalloidin. Filopodia contain several microtubules that are often organized in a bundle. Moreover, F-actin is present within the filopodia. To characterize which of these cytoskeletal systems is involved with cell and organelle motility, we have examined cell dynamics after incubations with colchicine or cytochalasin D. The results of these pharmacological experiments provide evidence that microtubules are required for both cell and organelle motility, but that actin filaments contribute to these phenomena and are required for the structural maintenance of slender filopodia.     

Filopodia are enriched in a cell cohesion molecule of Mr 80,000 and participate in cell-cell contact formation in Dictyostelium discoideum

During the early phase of Dictyostelium discoideum development, cells undergo chemotactic migration to form tight aggregates. A developmentally regulated surface glycoprotein of Mr 80,000 (gp80) has been implicated in mediating the EDTA-resistant type of cell cohesion at this stage. We have used a monoclonal antibody directed against gp80 to study the topographical distribution of gp80 on the cell surface. Indirect immunofluorescence studies showed that gp80 was primarily localized on the cell surface, with a higher concentration at contact areas. Immunoelectron microscopy was carried out by indirect labeling using protein A-gold, and a nonrandom distribution of gp80 was revealed. In addition to contact regions, gold particles were found preferentially localized on filopodia. Quantitative analysis using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) showed that approximately 60% more gold particles were localized in contact regions in comparison with the noncontact regions, and the filopodial surfaces had a twofold higher gold density. Both TEM and scanning electron microscopy showed that contact areas were enriched in filopodial structures. Filopodia often appeared to adhere to either smooth surfaces or similar filopodial structures of an adjacent cell. These observations suggest that the formation of stable cell-cell contacts involves at least four sequential steps in which filopodia and gp80 probably play an important role in the initial stages of recognition and cohesion among cells.     

The mechanisms used by enteropathogenic Escherichia coli to control filopodia dynamics

Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli (EPEC) subverts actin dynamics in eukaryotic cells by injecting effector proteins via a type III secretion system. First, WxxxE effector Map triggers transient formation of filopodia. Then, following recovery from the filopodial signals, EPEC triggers robust actin polymerization via a signalling complex comprising Tir and the adaptor proteins Nck. In this paper we show that Map triggers filopodia formation by activating Cdc42; expression of dominant-negative Cdc42 or knock-down of Cdc42 by siRNA impaired filopodia formation. In addition, Map binds PDZ1 of NHERF1. We show that Map–NHERF1 interaction is needed for filopodia stabilization in a process involving ezrin and the RhoA/ROCK cascade; expression of dominant-negative ezrin and RhoA or siRNA knock-down of RhoA lead to rapid elimination of filopodia. Moreover, we show that formation of the Tir-Nck signalling complex leads to filopodia withdrawal. Recovery from the filopodial signals requires phosphorylation of a Tir tyrosine (Y474) residue and actin polymerization pathway as both infection of cells with EPEC expressing TirY474S or infection of Nck knockout cells with wild-type EPEC resulted in persistence of filopodia. These results show that EPEC effectors modulate actin dynamics by temporal subverting the Rho GTPases and other actin polymerization pathways for the benefit of the adherent pathogen.     

Induction of bovine bronchial epithelial cell filopodia by tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate,calcium ionophore,and lysophosphatidic acid

The morphological responses of primary bovine bronchial epithelial cells (BBECs) cultured in serum-free medium to protein kinase activators have been examined. When attached to type I collagen-coated tissue culture dishes, the cells responded to tetradecanoyl phorbol acetate (TPA), calcium ionophore A23187, and lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) by extruding filopodia. In contrast, no morphological changes were elicited by exposures to either epinephrine or dibutyryl-cAMP. Formation of filopodia was accompanied by actin filament reorganization as demonstrated by staining with labeled phalloidin. Exposures to varied TPA concentrations for 2 h showed maximal stimulation of filopodial extrusions at 10 nM TPA with half-maximal stimulation at 1 nM. Time-course measurements with 10 nM TPA showed filopodia formation within 30 min of exposure, with 85% of the BBECs being filopodia positive after 5 h. Filopodia induction in 20-30% of the cells could be achieved by 1–100 m?M LPA concentrations. BBECs acquired increasing resistance to TPA-induced filopodia during the initial 5 days in culture; however, responsiveness to TPA was regenerated by mild treatment with trypsin. Inclusion of fibronectin or vitronectin into the attachment matrix had no effects on the rates or extent of TPA-induced filopodia formation. © 1995 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Localization of a class III myosin to filopodia tips in transfected HeLa cells requires an actin-binding site in its tail domain

Bass Myo3A, a class III myosin, was expressed in HeLa cells as a GFP fusion in order to study its cellular localization. GFP-Myo3A localized to the cytoplasm and to the tips of F-actin bundles in filopodia, a localization that is consistent with the observed concentration toward the distal ends of F-actin bundles in photoreceptor cells. A mutation in the motor active site resulted in a loss of filopodia localization, suggesting that Myo3A motor activity is required for filopodial tip localization. Deletion analyses showed that the NH2-terminal kinase domain is not required but the CO2H-terminal 22 amino acids of the Myo3A tail are required for filopodial localization. Expression of this tail fragment alone produced fluorescence associated with F-actin throughout the cytoplasm and filopodia and a recombinant tail fragment bound to F-actin in vitro. An actin-binding motif was identified within this tail fragment, and a mutation within this motif abolished both filopodia localization by Myo3A and F-actin binding by the tail fragment alone. Calmodulin localized to filopodial tips when coexpressed with Myo3A but not in the absence of Myo3A, an observation consistent with the previous proposal that class III myosins bind calmodulin and thereby localize it in certain cell types.