Use of short-term progestin treatment to resynchronize the second estrus following synchronized breeding in beef heifers

Two trials were conducted to evaluate the efficacy of short-term progestin administration to resynchronize the second estrus after artificial insemination in yearling beef heifers. In Trial 1 crossbred yearling heifers (n = 208) were synchronized with Syncro-Mate-B (SMB) and artificially inseminated (AI) between 48 and 54 h following implant removal. Implant removal is defined as Day 1. Following AI, the heifers were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 experimental groups. Group 1 heifers were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA) daily from Day 17 to 21 at a rate of 0.5 mg/head, while Group 2 control received no exogenous progestin during this period. Synchrony of estrus was defined as the 3-d period in which the highest number of heifers expressed behavioral estrus in each group. There was no difference (P < 0.05) in the pregnancy rate during the second estrus due to MGA supplementation. More MGA-treated heifers (P < 0.01) expressed estrus in a 3-d period than the controls. In Trial 2, yearling heifers (n = 108) were synchronized with 2 injections of PGF(2alpha) (second PGF(2alpha) injection is designated as Day 1) administered 14 d apart with AI 12 h after the onset of behavioral estrus. The heifers were then randomly assigned to 1 of the following 3 treatment groups after initial AI: 1) MGA fed at 0.5 mg/head daily from Days 17 to 21; 2) norgestomet administered in 6.0-mg implants from Days 17 to 21; 3) untreated control heifers. Blood samples were collected on Day 21 and analyzed for progesterone (P(4)). Elevated P(4) (> 1 ng/ml) on Day 21 indicated pregnancy to the first insemination. Synchrony among the 3 groups of heifers was similar (P > 0.10); however, the second estrus was less (P < 0.05) variable in the MGA and norgestomet treated heifers. During the resynchronized second estrus, conception rates were not affected by progestin treatment (MGA 40%, norgestomet 64%, and control 62%; P > 0.10). However, a proportion of heifers treated MGA 10% 4 36 and norgestomet 3% 1 36 expressed behavioral estrus during second estrus even though they were diagnosed as pregnant from first service by elevated P(4) levels on Day 21. We conclude that short-term use of progestin from Days 17 to 21 following AI causes closer synchrony of estrus; however, inseminating pregnant heifers that exhibit behavioral estrus may cause abortion.     

Comparison of controlled internal drug release device and melengesterol acetate as progestin sources in an estrous synchronization protocol for beef heifers

The objectives of this experiment were to compare estrous synchronization responses and AI pregnancy rates of beef heifers using protocols that included either CIDR or MGA as the progestin source. The hypotheses tested were that: (1) estrous synchronization responses after (a) progestin removal, and (b) PGF(2alpha); and, (2) AI pregnancy rates, do not differ between heifers synchronized with either progestin source. At the start of the experiment (Day 0) in both years, heifers were assigned randomly to receive, MGA supplement for 14 days (MGA-treated; n=79) or CIDR for 14 days (CIDR-treated; n=77). On Day 14 progestin was removed and heifers were observed for estrus up to and after PGF(2alpha) on Days 31 and 33 for CIDR-treated and MGA-treated heifers, respectively. Heifers that exhibited estrus within 60h after PGF(2alpha) were inseminated by AI 12h later; the remaining heifers were inseminated at 72h after PGF(2alpha) and given GnRH (100mug). More (P<0.05) CIDR-treated heifers exhibited estrus within 120h after progestin removal than MGA-treated heifers. Intervals to estrus after progestin removal were shorter (P<0.05) for CIDR-treated heifers than MGA-treated heifers. More (P<0.05) CIDR-treated heifers exhibited estrus and were inseminated within 60h after PGF(2alpha) than MGA-treated heifers. Pregnancy rates did not differ (P>0.10) between MGA-treated (66%) and CIDR-treated (62%) heifers. In conclusion, the use of CIDR as a progestin source in a 14-day progestin, PGF(2alpha), and timed AI and GnRH estrous synchronization protocol was as effective as the use of MGA to synchronize estrus and generate AI pregnancies in beef heifers.     

Comparison of timed insemination with insemination at estrus following synchronization of estrus with a MGA-prostaglandin system in beef heifers

Three trials utilizing 231 beef heifers were conducted in 1993 to determine if a timed insemination would result in similar synchronized pregnancy rates as insemination by estrus following synchronization of estrus using the 14-d MGA-prostaglandin system. All heifers were fed 0.5 mg MGA/h/d fof 14 d and given a 25 mg injection of PGF(2)alpha im 17 d after the final day of MGA feeding. Heifers in Group 1 (timed AI treatment) were inseminated at 72 h after the prostaglandin injection independent of whether or not they were observed in estrus. Heifers in Group 2 (AI by estrus) were inseminated 12 to 18 h after the onset of estrus. Since the trial was a significant source of variation for synchronized pregnancy rate, the effect of treatment on pregnancy rate was analyzed for each trial. Synchronized pregnancy rates in Trials 2 and 3 were similar in both treatment groups; 37 vs 35% and 61 vs 58% for the timed AI vs AI by estrus (Groups 1 and 2) in Trials 2 and 3, respectively. In both of these trials the degree of estrous synchrony was high. In Trial 1, the synchronized pregnancy rate in heifers that were time-inseminated was significantly lower than that of heifers that were inseminated by estrus (29 vs 57%). The lower synchronized pregnancy rate of Group 1 (timed AI) heifers in Trial 1 appeared to be due to the low degree of estrous synchrony in this trial. Our results indicate that using timed insemination with the 14-d MGA-prostaglandin system will give similar synchronized pregnancy rates as inseminating by estrus in groups of beef heifers where the degree of synchrony is high. However, in heifers where the degree of estrous synchrony is low, a timed insemination reduces synchronized pregnancy rates.     

Effect of estrous cycle stage at Syncro-Mate B treatment on conception and time to estrus in cattle

Two trials involving 85 heifers and 67 cows were conducted to determine the effect of estrous cycle stage at the time of Syncro-Mate-B((R)) (SMB) treatment on interval to estrus following implant removal and on conception rate at the synchronized estrus. In Trial 1, 57 beef and 28 dairy heifers were treated with SMB on each representative day of a 22-d estrous cycle (estrus = Day 0). Beef heifers were artificially inseminated approximately 48 h after implant removal, whereas dairy heifers were inseminated 0 to 12 h after detection of estrus. Inseminations were scored by the inseminator according to their difficulty. Interval to the onset of estrus was not different between heifers treated early ( Day 11) in the cycle (35.2 +/- 7.2 h). Conception rate at the synchronized estrus was slightly higher in early-cycle heifers (22 47 = 47% ) compared to late-cycle heifers (14 38 = 37% , P = 0.2). Heifers that were difficult to inseminate had lower (P < 0.01) conception rates (2 11 = 18% ) at the synchronized estrus than heifers considered normal (21 51 = 41% ) or easier than normal to inseminate (13 23 = 57% ). In Trial 2, of the 131 beef cows synchronized, 67 that were estimated to be either early or late in the estrous cycle by progesterone analysis were utilized. Cows were treated with SMB and inseminated without regard to estrus 48-h after implant removal. Inseminations were scored as in Trial 1. Calves were separated from cows from the time of implant removal to insemination. Conception rate was higher (P < 0.05) in cows treated with SMB early ( Day 11, 16 35 = 46% ). Cows that were difficult to inseminate had a lower (P < 0.01) conception rate (0 8 = 0% ) than cows that were normal (43 94 = 46% ) or easier than normal to inseminate (13 29 = 45% ).     

Comparison of two MGA-PGF2alpha systems for synchronization of estrus in beef heifers

Yearling beef heifers (n = 193) were used to evaluate reproductive performance attained with 2 MGA-PGF(2)alpha synchronization systems. These treatments were compared with an untreated control group. The 14-d MGA heifers were synchronized by feeding 0.5 mg MGA/h/d for 14 d. At 17 d after the last MGA feeding, these heifers were injected with PGF(2)alpha (25 mg, im). Heifers in the 7-d MGA treatment group were fed 0.5 mg MGA/h/d for 7 d and received a 25-mg, im injection of PGF(2)alpha on the last day of the MGA feeding period. Heifers in all 3 treatment groups were observed for estrus every 12 h for 7 d beginning 24 h after the PGF(2)alpha injection. Heifers observed in estrus during this 7-d period were artificially inseminated approximately 12 h after the onset of estrus. The percentages of heifers in estrus during the 7-d synchronized period were 75.4, 56.3 and 17.2% for the 14-d MGA, 7-d MGA and control groups, respectively. The estrous responses were significantly different in each treatment. The percentage of heifers in estrus during the peak 24-h period was higher (P < 0.05) in heifers synchronized with the 14-d MGA system than in heifers synchronized with the 7-d MGA system (75.5 vs 50.0%). The synchronized conception rate of the 14-d MGA heifers was significantly higher (65.3%) than that of both the 7-d MGA (41.7%) and control (45.4%) heifers. Synchronized conception rates were similar (P = 0.79) in the 7-d MGA and control treatments. Synchronized pregnancy rates were 55.2, 32.4 and 15.2% for the 14-d MGA, 7-d MGA and control groups, respectively. Both synchronization treatments resulted in significantly higher synchronized pregnancy rates compared with that of the controls. The synchronized pregnancy rate was higher (P < 0.05) in the 14-d MGA group than it was in the 7-d MGA group. The mean day of conception within the breeding season was 11.5 and 9.3 d shorter in the 14-d MGA heifers than in the 7-d MGA and control heifers, respectively. Our results indicate that using the 14-d MGA system to synchronize estrus in beef heifers results in better reproductive performance than that attained in heifers synchronized with the 7-d MGA system or in control heifers.     

The use of estradiol and/or GnRH in a two-dose PGF protocol for breeding management of beef heifers

The objective was to determine reproductive performance following AI in beef heifers given estradiol to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and estradiol or GnRH to synchronize ovulation in a two-dose PGF-based protocol. In Experiment 1, 561 cycling (confirmed by ultrasonography), Angus heifers received 500 microg cloprostenol, i.m. (PGF) twice, 14 days apart (days 0 and 14) and were equally allocated to four groups in a 2 x 2 factorial design. On Day 7, heifers received either 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 50 mg progesterone (P), i.m. in oil (EBP group) or no treatment (NT group). Half the heifers in each group received 1mg EB, i.m. in oil on Day 15 (24h after the second PGF treatment) with TAI 28 h later (52 h after PGF), and the other half received 100 microg GnRH, i.m. on Day 17 (72 h after PGF) concurrent with TAI. All heifers were observed for estrus twice daily from days 13 to 17; those detected in estrus more than 16 h before scheduled TAI were inseminated 4-16 h later and considered nonpregnant to TAI. Overall pregnancy rate (approximately 35 days after AI) was higher in heifers that received EBP than those that did not (61.6% versus 48.2%, respectively; P < 0.002); but was lower in heifers that received EB after PGF than those that received GnRH (50.0% versus 59.8%; P < 0.02). Although estrus was detected prior to TAI in 77 of 279 heifers (27.6%) treated with EBP (presumably due to induced luteolysis), they were inseminated and 53.2% became pregnant. Overall pregnancy rates were 51.4, 68.3, 45.0, and 55.0% in the NT/GnRH, EBP/GnRH, NT/EB, and EBP/EB groups, respectively (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, 401 cycling, Angus heifers were used. The design was identical to Experiment 1, except that 1.5mg estradiol-17beta (E-17beta) plus 50mg progesterone (E-17betaP) and 1mg E-17beta were used in lieu of EBP and EB, respectively. All heifers receiving E-17beta 24h after the second injection of PGF (NT/E-17beta and E-17betaP/E-17beta) were TAI 28 h later without estrus detection, i.e. 52 h after PGF. Heifers in the other two groups received 100 microg GnRH, i.m. 72 h after PGF and were concurrently TAI; heifers in these two groups that were detected in estrus prior to this time were inseminated 4-12h later and considered nonpregnant to TAI. Estrus rate during the first 72 h after the second PGF treatment was higher (P < 0.05) in the E-17betaP/GnRH group (45.0%; n = 100) than in the NT/GnRH group (16.0%; n = 100), but conception rate following estrus detection and AI was not different (mean, 57.4%; P = 0.50). Overall pregnancy rate was not significantly different among groups (mean, 46.9%; P = 0.32). In summary, the use of EB or E-17beta to synchronize follicular wave emergence and estradiol or GnRH to synchronize ovulation in a two-dose, PGF-based protocol resulted in acceptable fertility to TAI. However, when 2mg EB was used to synchronize follicular wave emergence, early estrus occurred in approximately 28% of heifers, necessitating additional estrus detection. A combination of estrus detection and timed-AI in a two-dose PGF protocol resulted in highly acceptable pregnancy rates.     

Prolonging the MGA-prostaglandin F2 alpha interval from 17 to 19 days in an estrus synchronization system for heifers

Our objective was to determine whether extending the interval from 17 to 19 d between removal of melengestrol acetate (MGA) feed and administration of PGF2 alpha would alter conception rates, pregnancy rates and the degree of synchrony in replacement beef heifers. A commercial heifer operation in north-central Kansas purchased 591 Angus x Hereford heifers from 12 sources. Prior to the spring breeding season, 14% of the heifers were culled. The remaining heifers were assigned randomly to 2 MGA-PGF2 alpha synchronization systems. All heifers were fed MGA (0.5 mg/head/d) for 14 d, and PGF2 alpha was administered either 17 or 19 d after the completion of MGA feeding. Heifers were inseminated artificially for 30 d followed by 30 d of natural mating. Based on each source, first-service conception rates ranged from 66 to 90%, whereas overall pregnancy rates ranged from 91 to 100%. Heifers given PGF2 alpha on Day 17 after MGA had first-service conception rates of 75.9% compared with 81.4% for heifers receiving PGF2 alpha on Day 19. In response to the PGF2 alpha injection, 99% of the Day 19 heifers that were detected in estrus were inseminated artificially by 72 h after the PGF2 alpha injection, whereas 74% of the heifers in the Day 17 treatment were inseminated by that time. Average interval to artificial insemination (AI) after PGF2 alpha was greater (P < 0.01) for the Day 17 heifers (73.1 +/- 1.1 h) than for the Day 19 heifers (56.2 +/- 1.1 h). No differences in conception rates or overall pregnancy rates occurred; however, heifers receiving PGF2 alpha on Day 19 after MGA had shorter intervals to estrus, and a greater proportion was inseminated within 72 h after PGF2 alpha, thus possibly facilitating successful timed insemination of the remaining heifers not yet inseminated by that time.     

Synchronization of estrus in early diestral dairy heifers with Prostaglandin F(2)alpha and estradiol benzoate

Following observation of estrus, 134 Holstein heifers were given injections of Prostaglandin F(2)alpha (PGF(2)alpha) between Days 5 and 10 of their cycle (estrus = Day 0). They were then randomly assigned to either a group receiving 400 mug of estradiol benzoate (E(2)B) 40 h or maintained as controls. Heifers observed in estrus within 120 h of PGF(2)alpha administration were inseminated (approximately 12 h after initial observation of estrus). Blood samples for progesterone determination were drawn from the coccygeal vein on Days 15 and 21 after insemination. Pregnancy was confirmed by palpation per rectum between Days 5.0 and 60 post insemination. When control and treated heifers were compared it was found that a higher percentage of heifers treated with E(2)B exhibited estrus after PGF(2)alpha, but there had been no effect on subsequent progesterone concentrations or pregnancy rates.     

Estrus synchronization in beef heifers with progestin-based protocols. I. Differences in response based on pubertal status at the initiation of treatment

Two progestin-based protocols for estrus synchronization in replacement beef heifers were compared on the basis of estrous response, interval to and synchrony of estrus, and pregnancy rate. The objective was to determine, whether addition of GnRH to a melengestrol acetate (MGA)-prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF2alpha) estrus synchronization protocol would improve synchrony of estrus without compromising fertility in yearling beef heifers. Heifers at two locations (Location 1, n = 60 and Location 2, n = 64) were assigned randomly to one of two treatments by breed and pubertal status. Heifers were defined as, pubertal when concentrations of progesterone in serum were elevated (> or = 1 ng/mL) in either one of two samples obtained 10 and 1 day prior to treatment initiation. Prior to MGA administration, 18/60 (30%) and 36/64 (56%) of the heifers at Locations 1 and 2, respectively, were pubertal. Heifers in both treatments were fed MGA (0.5 mg/head/day in 1.8 kg/head/day supplement) for 14 days followed by 25 mg of PGF2alpha i.m. (MGA-PGF2alpha) 19 days after MGA withdrawal (Day 33 of treatment). One-half of the heifers at each location received 100 microg of GnRH i.m. 12 days after MGA withdrawal (Day 26 of treatment; MGA Select). The control group received only MGA-PGF2alpha. Heifers were observed for signs of behavioral estrus continuously during daylight hours for 7 days beginning on the day PGF2alpha was administered. Heifers were inseminated 12 h after observed estrus. There was a treatment by location by pubertal status interaction (P < 0.05) for interval to estrus. Compared to the respective control treatment at each location, prepubertal heifers assigned to the MGA Select protocol at Location 1 had longer intervals to estrus, whereas at Location 2, prepubertal heifers assigned to the MGA-PGF2alpha protocol had longer intervals to estrus. The higher number of pubertal heifers at Location 2 was associated with a reduced variance in the interval to estrus among MGA Select treated heifers. Total estrous response and synchronized conception rates were similar between treatments at both locations. These data suggest that addition of GnRH to the MGA-PGF2alpha protocol may improve synchrony of estrus, however, the degree of synchrony may be influenced by pubertal status of heifers at the time treatments are imposed. Further studies are needed to define production systems in which the MGA Select protocol is warranted for use in beef heifers.     

Evaluation of a melengestrol acetate and prostaglandin F(2)alpha system for the synchronization of estrus in beef heifers

This study was conducted to determine the efficacy of feeding melengestrol acetate (MGA) for 14 days and administering prostaglandin F(2)alpha (PGF) 17 days after MGA to synchronize or induce estrus in yearling beef heifers. The study involved 56 Angus (n = 19), Hereford (n = 15) and Simmental (n = 22) heifers that were assigned by breed and pubertal status to either MGA+PGF or to control groups. Heifers in the synchronized group were fed 0.5 mg MGA per head per day for 14 days from a grain carrier and were injected with 25 mg, i.m. PGF 17 days after the last daily feeding of MGA. Control heifers were fed from a grain carrier without MGA and were not treated with PGF. Heifers were classified as pubertal when concentrations of progesterono in the serum exceeded 1 ng/ml in 1 of 2 samples collected prior to the initiation of treatments. Blood samples were collected 7 days before and on the day that treatment with MGA or carrier began and 7 days before and on the day that PGF was administered. Progesterone concentrations in the serum were elevated ( > 1 ng/ml) in 61% (17 28 ) of the MGA+PGF-treated heifers and in 61% (17 28 ) of the control heifers prior to feeding MGA. However, concentrations of progesterone in the serum at the time PGF was administered differed (P<0.05) between MGA+PGF and control groups. Concentrations of progesterone in the serum exceeded 1 ng/ml in 100% (28 28 ) of the MGA+PGF-treated heifers and in 71% (20 28 ) of control heifers at the time PGF was administered (P<0.05). All heifers were inseminated 12 hours after the first detected estrus. Twenty-two of 28 (79%) of the MGA+PGF-treated heifers exhibited estrus within 6 days after PGF compared with 9 of 28 (32%) of control heifers (P<0.05). The conception rate at first service did not differ between MGA+PGF and control groups (64% and 67%, respectively). Synchronized pregnancy rates were higher (P<0.05) for MGA+PGF-treated heifers than for control heifers (14 28 , 50% vs 6 28 , 21%). Increased concentrations of progesterone in serum at the time PGF was administered and higher pregnancy rates during the synchronized period among MGA+PGF-treated heifers demonstrate the efficacy of this treatment for use in estrus synchronization. Moreover, this treatment may have a potential effect on inducing puberty in breeding age heifers.     

Use of a GnRH agonist to prevent the endogenous LH surge and injection of exogenous LH to induce ovulation in heifers superstimulated with FSH: a new model for superovulation

A new protocol for superovulating cattle which allows for control of the timing of ovulation after superstimulation with FSH was developed. The preovulatory LH surge was blocked with the GnRH agonist deslorelin, and ovulation was induced by injection of LH. In Experiment 1, heifers (3-yr-old) were assigned to a control group (Group 1A, n = 4) or a group with deslorelin implants (Group 1B, n = 5). On Day -7, heifers in Group 1A received a progestagen CIDR-B((R))device, while heifers in Group 1B received a CIDR-B((R))device + deslorelin implants. Both groups were superstimulated with twice daily injections of FSH (Folltropin((R))-V): Day 0, 40 mg (80 mg total dose on Day 0); Day 1, 30 mg; Day 2, 20 mg; Day 3, 10 mg. On Day 2, heifers were given PGF (a.m.) and CIDR-B((R)) devices were removed (p.m.). Three heifers in Group 1A had a LH surge and ovulated, whereas neither of these events occurred in Group 1B (with deslorelin implants) heifers. In Experiment 2, heifers (3-yr-old) were assigned to 1 of 4 equal groups (n = 6). On Day -7, heifers in Group 2A received a norgestomet implant, while heifers in Groups 2B, 2C and 2D received norgestomet + deslorelin implants. Heifers were superstimulated with FSH starting on Day 0 as in Experiment 1. On Day 2, heifers were given PGF (a.m.) and norgestomet implants were removed (p.m.). Heifers in Groups 2B to 2D were given 25 mg LH (Lutropin((R))): Group 2B, Day 4 (a.m.); Group 2C, Day 4 (p.m.); Group 2D, Day 5 (a.m.). Heifers in Group 2A were inseminated at estrus and 12 and 24 h later, while heifers in Groups 2B to 2D were inseminated at the time of respective LH injection and 12 and 24 h later. Injection of LH induced ovulation in heifers in Groups 2B to 2D. Heifers in Group 2C had similar total ova and embryos (15.2 +/- 1.4) as heifers in Group 2A (11.0 +/- 2.8) but greater (P < 0.05) numbers than heifers in Group 2B (7.0 +/- 2.3) and Group 2D (6.3 +/- 2.0). The number of transferable embryos was similar for heifers in Group 2A (5.8 +/- 1.8) and Group 2C (7.3 +/- 2.1) but lower (P < 0.05) for heifers in Group 2B (1.2 +/- 0.8) and Group 2D (1.3 +/- 1.0). The new GnRH agonist-LH protocol does not require observation of estrus, and induces ovulation in superstimulated heifers that would not have an endogenous LH surge.     

Assessment of estrus detection by visual observation and electronic detection methods and characterization of factors associated with estrus and pregnancy in beef heifers

One hundred and sixty-four beef heifers representing Angus, Brahman and their crosses were subjected to estrus synchronization treatment following evaluation of weight, body condition score and reproductive tract. Heifers were assigned to 1 of 2 methods of estrus detection, either visual observation for signs of standing estrus or a rump-mounted pressure-sensitive detection device. All heifers were artificially inseminated during a 25d insemination period and then bred by a bull. The effectiveness of estrus detection and timely insemination were evaluated by the type of detection method, breed and breeding event resulting in a pregnancy. Although there was not a significant difference in first service conception for method of detection, at the end of a 25-d insemination period, 60.5% of the visually observed heifers were pregnant, while only 45.8% of the heifers detected by the mount detection device were pregnant (P = 0.05). The reduced 25-d conception rate in the pressure-sensitive detection group suggested that insemination of detected heifers may not have been optimal for pregnancy. The mean time to estrus after implant removal and the time of insemination were evaluated. Heifers pregnant at the first service had a shorter time to estrus (32.11 +/- 1.6 h, P=0.13), a longer mean interval from the start of estrus to insemination (12.10 +/- 1.2 h, P = 0.16) and a positive mean interval between the end of standing estrus and the time of insemination (3.17 +/-1.7 h, P=0.19) than heifers not conceiving at the synchronized estrus (38.5 +/- 2.1, 7.42 +/- 1.9 h and -2.04 +/- 2.1 h, respectively). Breed differences were observed in estrus durations (Angus 8.52 +/- 1.2 h, Brahman 6.65 +/- 1.2 h, crossbred 11.90 +/- 1.2 h; P = 0.03), number of mounts (19 +/- 3.6, 25 +/- 5.4, 37 +/- 5.5, respectively; P=0.02) and gestation length (281 +/- 1.2, 291 +/- 1.8, 286 +/- 1.1 d, respectively; P = 0.001).     

Factors influencing estrus and conception in dairy heifers after prostaglandin F2-alpha

The influence of interval between insemination (AI) and estrus on subsequent fertility of PGF(2alpha)-treated (two injections of 25 mg, 11 days apart) heifers was assessed in two experiments. In Experiment I, 240 heifers were allotted to Control (AI 8 to 16 hr after estrus detection), PGF(2alpha)-E (AI 8 to 16 hr after estrus within five days of second PGF(2alpha)) or PGF(2alpha)-T (AI 80 hr after second PGF(2alpha)). In Experiment II, 130 heifers were assigned to control (AI as before) or PGF(2alpha) (AI 72 or 80 hr after second PGF(2alpha)) with half the PGF(2alpha) heifers receiving 100 mug GnRH 72 hr after first PGF(2alpha). Heifers of both experiments that were bred at a predetermined time were arrayed by interval from AI to estrus. Conception rates of heifers detected in estrus from 32 hr before AI to 24 hr after AI did not differ (x(2)=3.35, df=5, P>0.5). The percentage of GnRH-treated heifers in estrus within five days (81.8%) was not (P>0.75) greater than those not receiving GnRH (77.3%) but they had higher (P<0.05) serum progesterone (P(4)) concentration at second PGF(2alpha) (3.17 vs 2.41 ng/ml). When P(4) values were arrayed for both groups at 1 ng intervals, the percentage of heifers exhibiting estrus increased with increasing P(4) level (P<0.05).     

Comparison of Melengestrol Acetate-Prostaglandin F(2)alpha to Syncro-Mate B for estrus synchronization in beef heifers

Three hundred and ten yearling heifers of various breeds were used in five trials to compare two estrus synchronization treatments. Treatment 1 consisted of Melengestrol Acetate-Prostaglandin F(2)alpha (MGA-PGF(2)alpha). Heifers were fed 0.5 mg MGA/head/d for 14 to 16 d. Sixteen or 17 d after the final MGA feeding, heifers were injected i.m. with 25 mg PGF(2)alpha. Treatment 2 consisted of Syncro-Mate B (SMB). Heifers were given a 9-d norgestomet implant plus an injection containing 3 mg norgestomet and 5 mg estradiol valerate i.m. at implant insertion. Heifers were observed for estrus at 6-h intervals for 120 h after the end of treatments and were artificially inseminated 12 to 18 h after observed estrus. Heifers synchronized with MGA-PGF(2)alpha and SMB had a similar (P > 0.10) estrous response (83.4 vs 90.2%) and a similar (P > 0.10) degree of synchrony (71.8 vs 79.0%) following treatment. However, the synchronized conception rate (68.7 vs 40.6%) and the synchronized pregnancy rate (57.3 vs 36.6%) were higher (P < 0.01) in MGA-PGF(2)alpha than SMB heifers. Breeding season pregnancy rates were similar in both treatment groups. Heifers in both groups that were classified as cycling prior to initiation of treatment had improved reproductive performance following synchronization compared with those classified as noncycling. Based on higher synchronized conception and pregnancy rates and lower labor requirements and drug costs, the MGA-PGF(2)alpha system appears to be a better method to synchronize estrus in beef heifers than the SMB system.     

Effect of estrus synchronization with Syncro-Mate-B((R)) on serum luteinizing hormone, progesterone and conception rate in Brahman heifers

Twenty-two estrous cyclic, 2-yr-old Brahman heifers were randomly assigned to receive either estrus synchronization with Syncro-Mate-B((R)) (SMB; 11) or no treatment (Control; 11). Blood samples were collected via tail vessel puncture at onset of estrus and daily thereafter until Day 11 after estrus. Blood samples were also collected from five SMB and five Control heifers at 0, 4, 8 and 12 h after the onset of estrus. All samples were processed to yield serum and stored at -20 degrees C until radioimmunoassay. Heifers were inseminated by one technician using semen from a single ejaculate of a Brahman bull 12 h after the onset of estrus. All SMB heifers exhibited estrus within 72 h of implant removal. All heifers had corpora lutea (CL) detected by rectal examination 8 to 12 d following estrus. Serum luteinizing hormone (LH) was not affected by treatment, time (4 - h intervals) or an interaction of treatment by time (P > 0.10). Independent analysis with h indicated that at h 12, SMB (2.2 +/- 0.06 ng/ml) had lower LH than did control heifers (8.9 +/- 2.1 ng/ml). Serum progesterone increased from Day 1 through Day 12 in all heifers, which is indicative of functional CL. Serum progesterone was affected by treatment (P < 0.0001) and time (d intervals; P < 0.10). Progesterone elevation was lower (P < 0.05) and area under the progesterone curve was lower (P < 0.03) in SMB (5.6 +/- 0.5 ng/ml, 32.0 +/- 4.5 units, respectively) when compared with control heifers (7.0 +/- 4 ng/ml, 43.7 +/- 2.4 units, respectively). Conception rate was lower (P < 0.01) in SMB heifers (2 of 11) than in control heifers (8 of 11). The lowered conception rate in SMB treated Brahman heifers may be due to altered timing of LH release following estrus, resulting in an altered time of ovulation.     

Fixed-time insemination in peripuberal,lightweight replacement beef heifers after estrus synchronization with PGF2alpha and GnRH

Estrus synchronization contributes to optimizing the use of time, labor, and financial resources by shortening the calving season, in addition to increasing the uniformity of the calf crop. We determined whether acceptable pregnancy rates could be achieved after synchronization of ovulation and fixed-time artificial insemination (AI) in peripuberal replacement beef heifers using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and PGF2alpha. Crossbred heifers from two herds (MH, n=239; SS, n=330) were wintered at a single location. After a prebreeding examination revealed that 55 heifers had a reproductive tract score (RTS) of 1 (infantile reproductive tracts), they were culled and the remaining heifers were assigned randomly to one of three treatment groups: administration of 25mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Days -12 and 0 followed by estrus detection and insemination between 10 and 14 h after an observed estrus (Control; n=173); administration of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day -6, followed by 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 0, then fixed-time AI and administration of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day +2 (GPG; n=172); and, treatment as for group GPG in addition to administration of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day -12 (GGPG; n=169). Bulls were introduced 10 days after AI for 60 days to breed heifers which did not conceive after AI (clean-up bulls). On Days -12, -6, and 0 transrectal ultrasonography was used to monitor ovarian structures in a subset of heifers (30 per treatment). At 30-35 days after AI, ultrasound was used to determine the presence of a viable fetus. Presence of a fetus and stage of pregnancy were determined via palpation per rectum 61-63 days after the conclusion of the breeding season. Heifers in the MH herd (309+/-1.9 kg) were heavier (P<0.001) than those in the SS herd (283+/-1.7 kg) at initiation of the breeding season. Synchronized pregnancy rates were greater (P<0.05) in GGPG (25.4%) and GPG (22.1%) than Control (12.7%) heifers. Pregnancy rates were 9, 21, 32, or 31% for heifers with RTS of 2, 3, 4, or 5, respectively. The average diameter of 22 follicles induced to ovulate in heifers treated with GnRH (GPG and GGPG treatments) was 14.2+/-0.8 mm (range=10.0-23.6 mm). In conclusion, a fixed-time ovulation synchronization program using GnRH and PGF2alpha improved pregnancy rates in peripuberal, lightweight replacement beef heifers.     

Response of prepubertal Bos taurus and Bos indicus x Bos taurus heifers to melengestrol acetate with or without gonadotropin-releasing hormone

The effectiveness of treatments to induce estrus in prepubertal beef heifers was evaluated. Angus x Hereford (n = 148) and Brahman x Hereford (n = 148) heifers were sorted after weaning by body weight into light and heavy weight blocks. Heifers were assigned to diets, calculated to reach a target weight of 55% or 65% of their projected mature weight by the start of breeding. Cyclicity was determined after a 160-d observation period and from concentrations of progesterone in serum determined 10 d before and on the day that treatments began to induce puberty. The remaining nonpubertal heifers, with concentrations of progesterone in serum of less than 1 ng/ml (0 or 10 d before treatment), were assigned randomly within breed and nutrition group to either a melengestrol acetate + saline (MGA+S) or MGA + gonadotropin-releasing hormone (MGA+GnRH) treatment. Prepubertal Angus x Hereford heifers (n = 11) and Brahman x Hereford heifers (n = 49) were fed 0.5 mg MGA for 7 d. Forty-eight hours after MGA, heifers were injected with 500 ug s.c. GnRH or 5 ml of saline. Blood samples were collected from all prepubertal heifers every 3 d after GnRH or saline for 30 d. There was no difference between treatments in the proportion of heifers that exhibited estrus by Day 7 after treatment. However, a larger (P<0.05) proportion of MGA+S-treated heifers exhibited estrus within 14 d after treatment than MGA+GnRH-treated heifers (87 vs 63%). Among heifers that exhibited estrus during that time period, the proportion with increased progesterone was higher (P<0.10) for the MGA+GnRH group than for the MGA+S group (71 vs 41%, Day 7; 79 vs 54%, Day 14). There was no difference in conception rate at first service between treatment groups. Thirty-seven and 53%, respectively, of the MGA+S and MGA+GnRH-treated heifers had short estrous cycles after treatment, and 44 and 50%, respectively, of those short cycles were repeated. Pregnancy rates at the end of 45 d were numerically higher for MGA+S heifers than for MGA+GnRH treated counterparts (63 vs 53%).     

Effects of one versus two doses of prostaglandin F2alpha on AI pregnancy rates in a 5-day, progesterone-based, CO-Synch protocol in crossbred beef heifers

The present study determined whether a 5-d progesterone-based CO-Synch protocol with a single dose of prostaglandin F_2α (PGF) at progesterone withdrawal on Day 5, would yield a timed AI pregnancy rate similar to two doses of PGF given 6 h apart on Day 5. Angus cross beef heifers (N = 562) at six locations were used. All heifers received 100 µg of gonadorelin hydrochloride (GnRH) and a controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insert on Day 0. Within farm, heifers were randomly allocated to receive one dose of 25 mg dinoprost (PGF) at CIDR removal on Day 5 (1 PGF; N = 264), or two doses of 25 mg PGF, with the first dose given on Day 5 at CIDR removal, and the second dose 6 h later (2 PGF; N = 298). Most heifers (N = 415) received a heat detector patch at CIDR removal. After CIDR removal, heifers were observed twice daily through Day 7 for estrus and heat detector aid status was recorded. On Day 8, heifers were given 100 µg of GnRH, heat detector aid status was recorded, and heifers were inseminated approximately 72 h after CIDR removal. Accounting for significant variables such as location (P < 0.01), heifers in estrus at or prior to AI (P < 0.001), and a treatment by location interaction (P < 0.01), two doses of PGF on Day 5 tended to have higher pregnancy rates to timed AI compared to those that received one dose of PGF (P = 0.06). In conclusion, heifers given two doses of PGF at CIDR removal on Day 5, in a 5-d CIDR-CO-Synch protocol, tended to have a higher pregnancy rate than those that received only one dose of PGF.     

Effect of stage of the estrous cycle on interval to estrus after PGF(2alpha) in beef cattle

Effect of stage of the estrous cycle at the time of prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) injection on subsequent reproductive events in beef females was studied in four trials involving 194 animals. Cycling animals were given two injections of 25 mg PGF(2alpha) 11 days apart or, in some cases, the interval was altered to allow the second injection to fall on a specific day of the cycle. Day of estrous cycle at time of the second injection was determined by estrous detection. Interval from the second PGF(2alpha) injection to the onset of estrus (interval to estrus) was shorter (P<.01) in heifers than in cows. Both cows and heifers injected on days 5 to 9 (early cycle) had a shorter (P<.01) interval to estrus (estrus = day 0) than did those injected on days 10 to 15 (late cycle). Conception rate was lower (P<.05) for early-cycle heifers than for late-cycle heifers inseminated by appointment at 80 hours. There was no significant difference in conception rate of early-or late-cycle heifers or cows inseminated according to estrous detection or early- or late-cycle cows inseminated at 80 hours. Progesterone concentrations in blood samples collected in heifers at 4-hour intervals after the second PGF(2alpha) injection on either day 7 or day 14 declined linearly (P<.05) through 36 hours. Day of the estrous cycle at PGF(2alpha) injection had no effect on rate of progesterone decline, even though heifers injected on day 7 had a shorter (P<.05) interval to estrus. All animals whose cycle length was not affected by the second PGF(2alpha) injection were treated on days 5 through 8 of the cycle, indicating that PGF(2alpha) was less effective in regressing the corpus luteum between days 4 and 9 of the cycle than later in the cycle.     

Synchronization of estrus in beef heifers with a norgestomet implant and prostaglandin F2alpha

In a 5-year study (1973-1977), 281 cycling beef heifers were treated with a 7-day norgestomet (SC21009) ear implant and an intramuscular injection of prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) at the time of implant removal or 24 hr before implant removal. Percentages of heifers in estrus by 36, 48, 60, 72, and 120 hr after implant removal were 32.4, 52.7, 71.6, 80.1, and 93.2, respectively. Onset of estrus occurred an average of 49.8 +/- 4.7 hr after treatment. Percentages of heifers in estrus 36 hr after treatment were 5.7 and 51.7 for those with a corpus luteum and those without a corpus luteum (or determined regressing by palpation) at implant removal, respectively. When PGF(2alpha) was injected 24 hr before implant removal, 55% of the heifers were in estrus by 36 hr after implant removal compared to 30% when PGF(2alpha) was injected at the time of implant removal; however, by 60 hr after implant removal the difference was 76% vs. 71%. First-service conception rates for synchronized and nonsynchronized heifers were 62.2% and 59.6%, respectively. During 1976 and 1977 heifers were checked for estrus every 4 hr and inseminated 2, 6, 10, 14, 18, 22, 26, or 30 hr after first detected to be in standing estrus. Conception rate was not significantly affected by time of insemination but tended to be higher for heifers bred 26 and 30 hr after first being detected in standing estrus (78.9% and 70.0% vs. average 59.2%). Treatment with a 7-day norgestomet implant plus a single injection of PGF(2alpha) 24 hr before or at implant removal appears to be a practical technique for synchronizing estrus in cycling heifers without affecting conception.