Elementary auxin response chains at the plasma membrane involve external abp1 and multiple electrogenic ion transport proteins

Studies of membrane electrical responses of isolated protoplasts to auxin have demonstrated the existence of elementary response chains to auxin at the plasma membrane, presently defined only by their uttermost ends. At one side, as demonstrated by several lines of evidence, the auxin perception unit involves proteins homologous to ZmER-abp1 (abp1), the most abundant auxin-binding protein from maize coleoptiles. At the other side, multiple ion transport proteins appear as targets of the auxin signal; the proton pump ATPase, an anion channel and potassium channels. We investigated early electrical responses to auxin at the plasma membrane of tobacco protoplasts. The work presented here will initially focus on abp1 and its functional role at the membrane. The C-terminus abp1 peptide (Pz151–163) was recently reported to modulate K⁺ currents at the plasma membrane of intact guard cells from broad bean [23] and induce plasma membrane hyperpolarisation of tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. These results further demonstrate that proteins involved in plasma membrane responses to auxin are related to maize abp1, and provide clues as to the region of the protein possibly involved in the interaction of abp1 with the plasma membrane. Secondly, this report concentrates on one of the targets of auxin, a voltage-dependent and ATP-regulated anion channel that we characterised on protoplasts from tobacco cell suspensions. This anion channel was specifically modulated by auxin, as already observed for the anion channel of guard cells [14]. Further work will be needed to assess if this auxin modulation involves a direct interaction between the hormone and the anion channel protein(s), or follows from the activation of a perception chain including abp1 homologues.     

Transmembrane auxin carrier systems – dynamic regulators of polar auxin transport

Recent investigations of the biochemistry, physiology and molecular genetics of polar auxin transport have greatly advanced our understanding of the process and of the part it plays in the regulation of development and in the responses of cells, tissues and organs to internal and external stimuli. The molecular and physiological characterization of mutants which exhibit lesions in polar auxin transport has led to the isolation and sequencing of genes which encode putative components of auxin carrier systems, or proteins which directly or indirectly regulate these systems. This work has revealed that specific auxin uptake and efflux carriers are coded not by single genes, but by whole families of genes, the expression of which is tissue or stimulus specific. Furthermore, evidence is accumulating rapidly that at least the auxin efflux carrier is a multi-component system consisting of both catalytic and regulatory subunits, including a separate phytotropin-binding protein. Other genes have been tentatively identified which code proteins that regulate the expression of genes coding auxin carrier components, or which regulate the intracellular traffic or activity of auxin carriers. Investigations of the turn-over and Golgi-mediated trafficking of auxin carrier proteins have revealed that essential components of at least the efflux carrier have a very short half-life in the plasma membrane and are replaced without the need for concurrent protein synthesis, leading to speculation that they might cycle between internal stores and the plasma membrane. The way is now clear for the development of specific molecular probes with which to investigate the intracellular transport and targeting of auxin carrier proteins.     

Dynamics in PIN2 auxin carrier ubiquitylation in gravity-responding Arabidopsis roots

Plant tropisms are decisively influenced by dynamic adjustments in spatiotemporal distribution of the growth regulators auxin. Polar auxin transport requires activity of PIN-type auxin carrier proteins, with their distribution at the plasma membrane significantly contributing to the directionality of auxin flow. Control of PIN protein distribution involves regulation of their endocytosis and further sorting into the lytic vacuole for degradation and recently, protein ubiquitylation has been demonstrated to control degradative sorting of plasma membrane proteins in plants.1-6 Here we show dynamic adjustments in PIN2 ubiquitylation in gravity-stimulated roots, a response that coincides with establishment of a lateral PIN2 expression gradient. Our results imply that perception and transduction of gravity signals triggers differential ubiquitylation of PIN2, which might feed back on the coordination of auxin distribution in root meristems.     

Auxin levels and auxin binding protein availability inrolB transformedBeta vulgaris cells

The final biological effect of auxin depends both on free auxin levels and on auxin perception capacity.RolB transformedBeta vulgaris L. hairy roots provide a system for studying both factors. Highly purified plasma membrane fractions were prepared with aqueous two-phase partitioning. Individual hairy root clones were assessed for the binding activities of plasma membrane-bound auxin binding proteins and for their free intracellular indole-3-acetic acid levels. The presence of a high affinity auxin binding protein with a dissociation constant of 9.07 x 10^?7 M was detected in the plasma membrane fractions isolated from non-transformed seedling roots and the six clones ofrolB transformed hairy roots. However, the levels of specific IAA binding considerably varied among different hairy root clones and between transformed and non-transformed roots. The levels of the detectable polypeptide in immunoblotting with an antibody against maize 22-kD auxin binding protein subunit were in good agreement to the levels that were detected in auxin binding assays. Differences in the indole-3-acetic acid levels were found between transformed and non-transformed roots and also between different transformed hairy root clones. A negative correlation was observed between free intracellular IAA levels and its specific binding to the plasma membrane-bound auxin binding proteins. A latency study indicated that the binding site for auxin may be located on the exterior face of the plasma membrane     

Conformational dynamics underlie the activity of the auxin-binding protein, Nt-abp1.

The auxin-binding protein 1 (ABP1) has been proposed to be involved in the perception of the phytohormone at the plasma membrane. Site-directed mutagenesis was performed on highly conserved residues at the C terminus of ABP1 to investigate their relative importance in protein folding and activation of a functional response at the plasma membrane. Detailed analysis of the dynamic interaction of the wild-type ABP1 and mutated proteins with three distinct monoclonal antibodies recognizing conformation-dependent epitopes was performed by surface plasmon resonance. The influence of auxin on these interactions was also investigated. The Cys(177) as well as Asp(175) and Glu(176) were identified as critical residues for ABP1 folding and action at the plasma membrane. On the contrary, the C-terminal KDEL sequence was demonstrated not to be essential for auxin binding, interaction with the plasma membrane, or activation of the transduction cascade although it does appear to be involved in the stability of ABP1. Taken together, the results confirmed that ABP1 conformational change is the critical step for initiating the signal from the plasma membrane.     

The auxin-binding protein Nt-ERabp1 alone activates an auxin-like transduction pathway

Hyperpolarization of tobacco protoplasts is amongst the earliest auxin responses described. It has been proposed that the auxin-binding protein, ABP1, or a related protein could be involved in the first step of auxin perception at the plasma membrane. Using for the first time homologous conditions for interaction between the protein Nt-ERabp1 or a synthetic peptide corresponding to the C-terminus and tobacco protoplasts, we have demonstrated that both can induce the hyperpolarization response. The results show that Nt-ERabp1 or the C-terminal peptide alone activates the auxin pathway from the outer face of the plasma membrane.     

Auxin Receptors and Auxin Binding Proteins

In the last few years, a large number of auxin-binding proteins (ABPs) have been reported. Implicitly or explicitly, interest in such proteins resides in their possible role as auxin receptors. Many of these proteins are characterized as ABPs solely by their susceptibility to covalent photolabeling by tritiated azido-indole-3-acetic acid. In most cases where the labeled polypeptides have been identified, they turn out to have roles unconnected with primary auxin perception. It seems likely that auxin is binding to sites of catholic specificity in these cases and the influence of experimental protocols on the data is discussed. Because the term ABP implies that auxin binding affects the function of that protein, the importance of establishing further criteria before photolabeled peptides can be termed ABPs is emphasized. Applying such criteria, only a very few ABPs are currently of interest and only one of these, maize ABP1, has been characterized in detail. This protein is located primarily within the lumen of the endoplasmic reticulum, although an important fraction appears to function on the outside of the plasma membrane. The protein has a wide species distribution and it now seems highly probable that it is a genuine auxin receptor, the only protein for which such a function has yet been established. This conclusion is based on three independent lines of electrophysiological evidence, together with confocal imaging of cytoplasmic pH changes.     

Auxin perception and signal transduction

The action of auxin on whole plants is very complex, but we are starting to understand how some of the earliest events are signalled in single cells. There is now good evidence that auxin induces rapid events at the plasma membrane by binding to a population of the auxin-binding protein ABPI, which is associated with a membrane-spanning docking protein, possibly a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR). ABPI is targeted to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) lumen, but it does not appear to bind auxin within the ER and its function (if any) in this location is unknown. It is also not known how the protein reaches the cell surface, but it is possible that it is exported together with its docking protein. Binding of auxin causes a conformational change affecting the C-terminus of ABPI and it is likely that this change serves to activate the receptor at the plasma membrane. The signal transduction pathway appears to involve activation of phospholipase A₂(PLA₂) leading to the production of lipid second messengers which activate the plasma membrane proton ATPase (H⁻-ATPase) by a phosphorylation-dependent mechanism. Branch points exist that could potentially lead from this pathway to responses in the nucleus, but there is not yet any firm evidence that ABP1 is involved in such responses. Since intracellular auxin concentrations are correlated with sensitivity in some cases, it is possible that there is also a site of auxin perception inside the cell.     

How Does Auxin Enhance Cell Elongation? Roles of Auxin‐Binding Proteins and Potassium Channels in Growth Control

Elongation growth and a several other phenomena in plant development are controlled by the plant hormone auxin. A number of recent discoveries shed light on one of the classical problems of plant physiology: the perception of the auxin signal. Two types of auxin receptors are currently known: the AFB/TIR family of F box proteins and ABP1. ABP1 appears to control membrane transport processes (H+ secretion, osmotic adjustment) while the TIR/AFBs have a role in auxin-induced gene expression. Models are proposed to explain how membrane transport (e.g., K+ and H+ fluxes) can act as a cross-linker for the control of more complex auxin responses such as the classical stimulation of cell elongation.     

Fluorescent muscarinic EGFP-hM1 chimeric receptors: design, ligand binding and functional properties

We describe the construction, expression and characterization of recombinant proteins comprising the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fused to the amino-terminal part of the muscarinic hM1 receptor together or not with an additional hexahistidine tag placed at the C-terminal end of the receptor. Expression of the fluorescent proteins reaches levels identical to those of the wt hM1 receptor, provided that fusion takes place at the very N-terminal end of the receptor. Also correct protein folding and targeting to plasma membrane is obtained upon addition of a signal peptide promoting amino-terminal domain translocation through the membrane. Ligand binding properties of--and activation of the calcium release response by--the fusion proteins are almost identical to those of the wild-type muscarinic receptor, indicating that such fluorescently-labelled receptors are valuable model systems for further functional, biochemical and structural studies.     

AUXIN BINDING PROTEIN1: the outsider

AUXIN BINDING PROTEIN1 (ABP1) is one of the first characterized proteins that bind auxin and has been implied as a receptor for a number of auxin responses. Early studies characterized its auxin binding properties and focused on rapid electrophysiological and cell expansion responses, while subsequent work indicated a role in cell cycle and cell division control. Very recently, ABP1 has been ascribed a role in modulating endocytic events at the plasma membrane and RHO OF PLANTS-mediated cytoskeletal rearrangements during asymmetric cell expansion. The exact molecular function of ABP1 is still unresolved, but its main activity apparently lies in influencing events at the plasma membrane. This review aims to connect the novel findings with the more classical literature on ABP1 and to point out the many open questions that still separate us from a comprehensive model of ABP1 action, almost 40 years after the first reports of its existence.     

Fluorescent Muscarinic EGFP-hM1 Chimeric Receptors: Design,Ligand Binding and Functional Properties

Abstract

We describe the construction, expression and characterization of recombinant proteins comprising the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) fused to the ammo-terminal part of the muscarinic hMl receptor together or not with an additional hexahistidine tag placed at the C-terminal end of the receptor. Expression of the fluorescent proteins reaches levels identical to those of the wt hM1 receptor, provided that fusion takes place at the very N-terminal end of the receptor. Also correct protein folding and targeting to plasma membrane is obtained upon addition of a signal peptide promoting amino-terminal domain translocation through the membrane. Ligarid binding properties of –- and activation of the calcium release response by –- the fusion proteins are almost identical to those of the wild-type muscarinic receptor, indicating that such fluorescently-labelled receptors are valuable model systems for further functional, biochemical and structural studies.     

The cytokinin receptors of Arabidopsis are located mainly to the endoplasmic reticulum

The plant hormone cytokinin is perceived by membrane-located sensor histidine kinases. Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) possesses three cytokinin receptors: ARABIDOPSIS HISTIDINE KINASE2 (AHK2), AHK3, and CYTOKININ RESPONSE1/AHK4. The current model predicts perception of the cytokinin signal at the plasma membrane. However, cytokinin-binding studies with membrane fractions separated by two-phase partitioning showed that in the wild type, as well as in mutants retaining only single cytokinin receptors, the major part of specific cytokinin binding was associated with endomembranes. Leaf epidermal cells of tobacco (Nicotiana benthamiana) expressing receptor-green fluorescent protein fusion proteins and bimolecular fluorescence complementation analysis showed strong fluorescence of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) network for all three receptors. Furthermore, separation of the microsomal fraction of Arabidopsis plants expressing Myc-tagged AHK2 and AHK3 receptors by sucrose gradient centrifugation followed by immunoblotting displayed the Mg2?-dependent density shift typical of ER membrane proteins. Cytokinin-binding assays, fluorescent fusion proteins, and biochemical fractionation all showed that the large majority of cytokinin receptors are localized to the ER, suggesting a central role of this compartment in cytokinin signaling. A modified model for cytokinin signaling is proposed.     

Patch-clamp analysis establishes a role for an auxin binding protein in the auxin stimulation of plasma membrane current in Zea mays protoplasts

The electrical response of Zea mays protoplasts to different auxins and to antibodies raised against an ER-located auxin binding protein from maize (Zm-ERabp1), was investigated using the patch-clamp technique (whole-cell configuration). Following a lag-phase of 30–40 seconds, indole-3-acetic acid and 1-naphthylacetic acid induced an outwardly directed current of positive charge in a concentration-dependent manner. This current was further increased by the fungal toxin fusicoccin (FC). The current was observed only in the presence of Mg²⁺-ATP in the patch-pipette and was abolished after addition of erythrosin B, an inhibitor of H⁺-ATPase, to the protoplasts indicating that the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase is activated by auxins and fusicoccin. Addition of antibodies directed against Zm-ERabp1 abolished the current induced by auxins, without affecting the response of protoplasts to fusicoccin. Antibodies directed against a peptide representing part of the putative auxin binding domain of Zm-ERabp1 showed auxin agonist activity, stimulating an outwardly directed membrane current in the absence of auxin. These results suggest that (i) Zm-ERabp1 or antigenically related proteins represent a site for auxin perception through which the plasma membrane H⁺-ATPase is activated, and (ii) that the activation of the H⁺-ATPase by such proteins is initiated from outside the plasma membrane.     

Anion channels and hormone signalling in plant cells

Current evidences support a central role in signal transduction and turgor regulation for plasma membrane anion channels. The present review focuses on these channels as putative targets for plant hormones. Various approaches have been developed to investigate the contribution of anion channels to hormone responses at the level of integrated responses of intact cells or organs, or to study directly the hormonal regulation of anion channels at the membrane level. These approaches are mainly discussed for two biological models, stomatal guard cells and hypocotyl or coleoptile cells, both cell types being equipped with several types of anion channels. Membrane potential and anion flux measurements, together with pharmacological studies using anion channel inhibitors, reveal that anion permeabilities are involved in the responses of guard cells or hypocotyl cells to abscisic acid and/or auxin. In a few instances, a modulation of anion channel activity can be detected in voltage-clamp or patch-clamp experiments. From these data and other studies, anion channel activation seems to constitute a very early step in many transduction cascades within response pathways to endogenous hormonal signals, but also to abiotic and biotic environmental signals such as light or molecules involved in plant-pathogen interactions. This points to plasma membrane anion channels as major actors in plant signalling networks.     

14-3-3 Proteins Buffer Intracellular Calcium Sensing Receptors to Constrain Signaling

Calcium sensing receptors (CaSR) interact with 14-3-3 binding proteins at a carboxyl terminal arginine-rich motif. Mutations identified in patients with familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia, autosomal dominant hypocalcemia, pancreatitis or idiopathic epilepsy support the functional importance of this motif. We combined total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy and biochemical approaches to determine the mechanism of 14-3-3 protein regulation of CaSR signaling. Loss of 14-3-3 binding caused increased basal CaSR signaling and plasma membrane levels, and a significantly larger signaling-evoked increase in plasma membrane receptors. Block of core glycosylation with tunicamycin demonstrated that changes in plasma membrane CaSR levels were due to differences in exocytic rate. Western blotting to quantify time-dependent changes in maturation of expressed wt CaSR and a 14-3-3 protein binding-defective mutant demonstrated that signaling increases synthesis to maintain constant levels of the immaturely and maturely glycosylated forms. CaSR thus operates by a feed-forward mechanism, whereby signaling not only induces anterograde trafficking of nascent receptors but also increases biosynthesis to maintain steady state levels of net cellular CaSR. Overall, these studies suggest that 14-3-3 binding at the carboxyl terminus provides an important buffering mechanism to increase the intracellular pool of CaSR available for signaling-evoked trafficking, but attenuates trafficking to control the dynamic range of responses to extracellular calcium.     

ABP1: An auxin receptor for fast responses at the plasma membrane

Auxin-binding protein 1 (ABP1) is an auxin receptor for responses not primarily regulated by gene regulation. One fast response is protoplast swelling. By using immunological ABP1 tools we showed that the highly conserved box a is not alone important for auxin binding. Box c is another part of the auxin binding domain.¹ Here we present a novel method to analyze auxin-induced, ABP1-mediated effects at the plasma membrane on single cell level in vivo. The fluorescence of FM4-64 in the plasma membrane is reduced by auxin and this response is mediated by ABP1. This method indicates a functional role of ABP1 at the plasma membrane.Key words: Auxin-binding protein 1, auxin, receptor, protoplast, plasma membrane, FM4-64     

Arabidopsis AtGSTF2 is regulated by ethylene and auxin, and encodes a glutathione S-transferase that interacts with flavonoids

Expression of the Arabidopsis glutathione S-transferase (GST) gene AtGSTF2 is induced by several stimuli, but the function of this GST remains unknown. We demonstrate that AtGSTF2 expression is also induced by glutathione, paraquat, copper, and naphthalene acetic acid (NAA) via a mechanism independent of ethylene perception, as determined by analysis of the ethylene-insensitive etr1 mutant. Deletion analyses identified two promoter regions important for regulation of AtGSTF2 expression in response to several of these inducers. Previous studies have suggested that AtGSTF2 interacts with indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and the auxin transport inhibitor 1-N-naphthylphthalamic acid (NPA). We show that recombinant AtGSTF2 directly binds IAA, NPA, and the artificial auxin NAA. As NPA may act as an endogenous flavonoid regulator of auxin transport, competition between NPA and flavonoids for binding to AtGSTF2 was examined. Both quercetin and kaempferol competed with NPA for AtGSTF2 binding, indicating that all three compounds bind AtGSTF2 at the same site. In transgenic Arabidopsis seedlings, AtGSTF2::GUS expression occurred at the root-shoot transition zone and was induced in this region, as well as at the root distal elongation zone, after treatment with IAA. In wild-type seedlings, AtGSTF2 is localized near the plasma membrane of cells in the root-shoot transition zone. However, both AtGSTF2::GUS expression and localization of AtGSTF2 protein were disrupted in flavonoid-deficient tt4 seedlings. Our results indicate that AtGSTF2 is involved not only in stress responses but also in development under normal growth conditions.     

A large‐scale expression strategy for multimeric extracellular protein complexes using Drosophila S2 cells and its application to the recombinant expression of heterodimeric ligand‐binding domains of taste receptor

Many of the extracellular proteins or extracellular domains of plasma membrane proteins exist or function as homo‐ or heteromeric multimer protein complexes. Successful recombinant production of such proteins is often achieved by co‐expression of the components using eukaryotic cells via the secretory pathway. Here we report a strategy addressing large‐scale expression of hetero‐multimeric extracellular domains of plasma membrane proteins and its application to the extracellular domains of a taste receptor. The target receptor consists of a heterodimer of T1r2 and T1r3 proteins, and their extracellular ligand binding domains (LBDs) are responsible for the perception of major taste substances. However, despite the functional importance, recombinant production of the heterodimeric proteins has so far been unsuccessful. We achieved the successful preparation of the heterodimeric LBD by use of Drosophila S2 cells, which have a high secretory capacity, and by the establishment of a stable high‐expression clone producing both subunits at a comparable level. The method overcame the problems encountered in the conventional transient expression of the receptor protein in insect cells using baculovirus or vector lipofection, which failed in the proper heterodimer production because of the biased expression of T1r3LBD over T1r2LBD. The large‐scale expression methodology reported here may serve as one of the considerable strategies for the preparation of multimeric extracellular protein complexes.