Time flies, a new molecular time-scale for brachyceran fly evolution without a clock

The insect order Diptera, the true flies, contains one of the four largest Mesozoic insect radiations within its suborder Brachycera. Estimates of phylogenetic relationships and divergence dates among the major brachyceran lineages have been problematic or vague because of a lack of consistent evidence and the rarity of well-preserved fossils. Here, we combine new evidence from nucleotide sequence data, morphological reinterpretations, and fossils to improve estimates of brachyceran evolutionary relationships and ages. The 28S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene was sequenced for a broad diversity of taxa, and the data were combined with recently published morphological scorings for a parsimony-based phylogenetic analysis. The phylogenetic topology inferred from the combined 28S rDNA and morphology data set supports brachyceran monophyly and the monophyly of the four major brachyceran infraorders and suggests relationships largely consistent with previous classifications. Weak support was found for a basal brachyceran clade comprising the infraorders Stratiomyomorpha (soldier flies and relatives), Xylophagomorpha (xylophagid flies), and Tabanomorpha (horse flies, snipe flies, and relatives). This topology and similar alternative arrangements were used to obtain Bayesian estimates of divergence times, both with and without the assumption of a constant evolutionary rate. The estimated times were relatively robust to the choice of prior distributions. Divergence times based on the 28S rDNA and several fossil constraints indicate that the Brachycera originated in the late Triassic or earliest Mesozoic and that all major lower brachyceran fly lineages had near contemporaneous origins in the mid-Jurassic prior to the origin of flowering plants (angiosperms). This study provides increased resolution of brachyceran phylogeny, and our revised estimates of fly ages should improve the temporal context of evolutionary inferences and genomic comparisons between fly model organisms.     

A molecular phylogeny for the oldest (nonditrysian) lineages of extant Lepidoptera,with implications for classification,comparative morphology and life‐history evolution

Within the insect order Lepidoptera (moths and butterflies), the so‐called nonditrysian superfamilies are mostly species‐poor but highly divergent, offering numerous synapomorphies and strong morphological evidence for deep divergences. Uncertainties remain, however, and tests of the widely accepted morphological framework using other evidence are desirable. The goal of this paper is to test previous hypotheses of nonditrysian phylogeny against a data set consisting of 61 nonditrysian species plus 20 representative Ditrysia and eight outgroups (Trichoptera), nearly all sequenced for 19 nuclear genes (up to 14 700 bp total). We compare our results in detail with those from previous studies of nonditrysians, and review the morphological evidence for and against each grouping The major conclusions are as follows. (i) There is very strong support for Lepidoptera minus Micropterigidae and Agathiphagidae, here termed Angiospermivora, but no definitive resolution of the position of Agathiphagidae, although support is strongest for alliance with Micropterigidae, consistent with another recent molecular study. (ii) There is very strong support for Glossata, which excludes Heterobathmiidae, but weak support for relationships among major homoneurous clades. Eriocraniidae diverge first, corroborating the morphological clade Coelolepida, but the morphological clades Myoglossata and Neolepidoptera are never monophyletic in the molecular trees; both are contradicted by strong support for Lophocoronoidea + Hepialoidea, the latter here including Mnesarchaeoidea syn.n. (iii) The surprising grouping of Acanthopteroctetidae + Neopseustidae, although weakly supported here, is consistent with another recent molecular study. (iv) Heteroneura is very strongly supported, as is a basal split of this clade into Nepticuloidea + Eulepidoptera. Relationships within Nepticuloidea accord closely with recent studies based on fewer genes but many more taxa. (v) Eulepidoptera are split into a very strongly supported clade consisting of Tischeriidae + Palaephatidae + Ditrysia, here termed Euheteroneura, and a moderately supported clade uniting Andesianidae with Adeloidea. (vi) Relationships within Adeloidea are strongly resolved and Tridentaformidae fam.n. is described for the heretofore problematic genus Tridentaforma Davis, which is strongly supported in an isolated position within the clade. (vii) Within Euheteroneura, the molecular evidence is conflicting with respect to the sister group to Ditrysia, but strongly supports paraphyly of Palaephatidae. We decline to change the classification, however, because of strong morphological evidence supporting palaephatid monophyly. (viii) We review the life histories and larval feeding habits of all nonditrysian families and assess the implications of our results for hypotheses about early lepidopteran phytophagy. The first host record for Neopseustidae, which needs confirmation, suggests that larvae of this family may be parasitoids. This published work has been registered in ZooBank: http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:C17BB79B‐EF8F‐4925‐AFA0‐2FEF8AC32876 .     

Higher‐level phylogeny of the insect order Hemiptera: is Auchenorrhyncha really paraphyletic?

The higher‐level phylogeny of the order Hemiptera remains a contentious topic in insect systematics. The controversy is chiefly centred on the unresolved question of whether or not the hemipteran suborder Auchenorrhyncha (including the extant superfamilies Fulgoroidea, Membracoidea, Cicadoidea and Cercopoidea) is a monophyletic lineage. Presented here are the results of a multilocus molecular phylogenetic investigation of relationships among the major hemipteran lineages, designed specifically to address the question of Auchenorrhyncha monophyly in the context of broad taxonomic sampling across Hemiptera. Phylogenetic analyses (maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference) were based on DNA nucleotide sequence data from seven gene regions (18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, histone H3, histone 2A, wingless, cytochrome c oxidase I and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 4) generated from 86 in‐group exemplars representing all major lineages of Hemiptera (plus seven out‐group taxa). All combined analyses of these data recover the monophyly of Auchenorrhyncha, and also support the monophyly of each of the following lineages: Hemiptera, Sternorrhyncha, Heteropterodea, Heteroptera, Fulgoroidea, Cicadomorpha, Membracoidea, Cercopoidea and Cicadoidea. Also presented is a review of the major lines of morphological and molecular evidence for and against the monophyly of Auchenorrhyncha.     

The problem with "the Paleoptera Problem:" sense and sensitivity

While the monophyly of winged insects (Pterygota) is well supported, phylogenetic relationships among the most basal extant pterygote lineages are problematic. Ephemeroptera (mayflies) and Odonata (dragonflies) represent the two most basal extant lineages of winged insects, and determining their relationship with regard to Neoptera (remaining winged insects) is a critical step toward understanding insect diversification. A recent molecular analysis concluded that Paleoptera (Odonata Ephemeroptera) is monophyletic. However, we demonstrate that this result is supported only under a narrow range of alignment parameters. We have further tested the monophyly of Paleoptera using additional sequence data from 18SrDNA, 28S rDNA, and Histone 3 for a broader selection of taxa and a wider range of analytical methodologies. Our results suggest that the current suite of molecular data ambiguously resolve the three basal winged insect lineages and do not provide independent confirmation of Odonata + Neoptera as supported via morphological data.     

Evolution of heteroneuran Lepidoptera (Insecta) and the utility of dopa decarboxylase for Cretaceous-age phylogenetics

This study tests the utility of the nuclear gene encoding dopa decarboxylase (DDC) for recovering Cretaceous‐age divergences within the lepidopteran clade Heteroneura, which contains 98% of lepidopteran species. A 709‐bp fragment of DDC has been sequenced in 32 species, including representatives of all major lineages of Heteroneura plus outgroups from more basal lepidopteran groups and the related order Trichoptera. Pairwise divergences across the first and second codon positions and amino acids increase with depth throughout the taxonomic hierarchy, indicating that non‐synonymous substitutions are not fully saturated; whereas, divergences across the third codon position level off at the family to superfamily level. Inclusion of non‐neolepidopteran outgroups results in phylogeny estimates that contradict well established groups, almost surely due to sparse taxon sampling and high character divergence. When these taxa and an equivalently divergent basal ditrysian are excluded, DDC trees show nearly complete recovery of ten uncontroversial basal heteroneuran ‘test clades’ of family rank and higher, about half with strong bootstrap support. Thus, DDC clearly carries phylogenetic signal at these levels. Bootstrap support for resolution of the controversial relationships among the five main heteroneuran groups (four monotrysian superfamilies plus Ditrysia) is individually low, but two of three previous hypotheses were statistically rejected overall by DDC. DDC trees within the primitive heteroneuran superfamily Incurvarioidea, though modestly supported, closely resemble a previous morphological hypothesis, while removing the requirement for reversal in a possible ‘key adaptation’, the larval case. Taxon overlap with a previous mtDNA study of Prodoxidae (Incurvarioidea), which includes much‐ studied mutualist pollinators, permits a comparison of substitution rates with the conservative mitochondrial COI+COII region, as well as combined‐data re‐examination of generic reltionships. Non‐synonymous substitution is about 25% slower in DDC than in COI+COII, though synonymous substitution is faster. With additional taxon sampling, and in combination with other genes, DDC promises to be a powerful tool for reconstructing among‐superfamily relationships within Lepidoptera and probably other insect groups.     

A phylogeny of robber flies (Diptera: Asilidae) at the subfamilial level: molecular evidence

We present the first formal analysis of phylogenetic relationships among the Asilidae, based on four genes: 16S rDNA, 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, and cytochrome oxidase II. Twenty-six ingroup taxa representing 11 of the 12 described subfamilies were selected to produce a phylogenetic estimate of asilid subfamilial relationships via optimization alignment, parsimony, and maximum likelihood techniques. Phylogenetic analyses support the monophyly of Asilidae with Leptogastrinae as the most basal robber fly lineage. Apocleinae+(Asilinae+Ommatiinae) is supported as monophyletic. The laphriinae-group (Laphriinae+Laphystiinae) and the dasypogoninae-group (Dasypogoninae+Stenopogoninae+Stichopogoninae+ Trigonomiminae) are paraphyletic. These results suggest that current subfamilial classification only partially reflects robber fly phylogeny, indicating the need for further phylogenetic investigation of this group.     

Phylogeny of Sabellidae (Annelida) and relationships with other taxa inferred from morphology and multiple genes

The monophyly of Sabellidae, the phylogenetic relationships of its lineages, and the composition of Sabellida have been debated for many decades. Most studies on sabellid phylogeny have focused on morphological features but little DNA work has been published to date. We performed analyses using maximum‐parsimony methods that included 36 sabellids and members of previously related taxa. We integrated morphological and DNA sequence data to resolve relationships at different hierarchical levels (135 morphological features, fragments of the nuclear ribosomal RNA genes 18S and 28S, and the mitochondrial gene 16S). The results indicate the monophyly of Sabellida, including Sabellidae and Serpulidae. Monophyly of Fabriciinae and Serpulidae is assessed and the two groups are recovered as sister taxa, but with weak support. There is no significant support for the monophyly of Sabellinae. Relationships between members of the Sabellidae are still partially unresolved due to incongruence between partitions and low support for most clades. The evolution and transformation of certain characters within Sabellidae is explored.
© The Willi Hennig Society 2010.     

On the constitution and phylogeny of Staphyliniformia (Insecta: Coleoptera)

The Staphyliniformia is one of the most diverse lineages of Coleoptera, with representatives occupying every conceivable non-marine niche. Phylogenetic relationships among its varied families and lower taxa have defied resolution. The problem has been further complicated by the recent suggestion that another major coleopteran series, Scarabaeiformia, is derived from within it. Here we present the first phylogenetic analyses, based on 18S rDNA sequences and morphological data, to explicitly examine this possibility. Thorough evaluation of alternative alignments and tree construction methods support the contention that Scarabaeiformia is derived from within Staphyliniformia. Though the analyses yielded strong support for few family level groupings within the expanded Staphyliniformia, they conclusively support a close relationship between Hydraenidae and Ptiliidae, which has often been debated. The primary factor hindering additional resolution appears to be the inconsistent rate of divergence in 18S among these taxa.     

Using 18S rDNA to resolve diaptomid copepod (Copepoda: Calanoida: Diaptomidae) phylogeny: an example with the North American genera

The phylogenetic relationships among the numerous genera of diaptomid copepods remain elusive due to difficulties in obtaining sufficient numbers of phylogenetically informative morphological characters for cladistic analysis. Molecular phylogenetic techniques offer high potential to resolve phylogenetic relationships in the absence of sufficient morphological characters because of the ease in which many characters can be unambiguously coded. I present the first molecular phylogeny for diaptomid copepod genera using 18S rDNA. Specifically, I test Light’s (1939) hypothesis regarding the interrelationships among the North American diaptomid genera. The 18S phylogeny is remarkably consistent with Light’s hypothesis. The endemic North American genera represent a monophyletic group exclusive of the non-endemic genera. Moreover, his hypothesized basal genus for the North America genera, Hesperodiaptomus, is the basal genus in this analysis. However, his Leptodiaptomus group is not reciprocally monophyletic with his Hesperodiaptomus group, but is rather a derived member of the latter group. Finally, the genus Mastigodiaptomus is found to be more closely allied with the non-endemic genera, as Light suggested. This phylogeny contributes heavily to the understanding of phylogenetic relationships among North American diaptomids and has large implications for the systematics of diaptomids in general. The use of 18S rDNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses of diaptomid copepods can be used to confirm the monophyly of recognized genera, the interrelationships among genera, and subsequent biogeographic interpretation of the family’s diversification. The use of molecular data, such as 18S rDNA sequences, to test phylogenetic hypotheses based on a very limited number of morphological characters will be a particularly useful approach to phylogenetic analysis in this system.     

Phylogeny of Mantodea based on molecular data: evolution of a charismatic predator

Abstract. The previously unknown phylogenetic relationships among Mantodea (praying mantids) were inferred from DNA sequence data. Five genes (16S rDNA, 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, cytochrome oxidase II and histone 3) were sequenced for sixty‐three taxa representing major mantid lineages and outgroups. The monophyly of mantid families and subfamilies was tested under varying parameter settings using parsimony and Bayesian analyses. The analyses revealed the paraphyly of Hymenopodidae, Iridopterygidae, Mantidae, and Thespidae and the monophyly of the Amorphoscelidae subfamily Paraoxypilinae. All represented subfamilies of Iridopterygidae and Mantidae appear paraphyletic. Mantoididae is sister group to the rest of the sampled mantid taxa. Lineages congruent with current subfamilial taxonomy include Paraoxypilinae, Hoplocoryphinae, Hymenopodinae, Acromantinae and Oligonicinae. The mantid hunting strategy is defined as either generalist, cursorial or ambush predators. By mapping hunting strategy onto our phylogeny, we reconstructed the ancestral predatory condition as generalist hunting, with three independent shifts to cursorial hunting and one shift to ambush hunting, associated with the largest radiation of mantid species.     

New insights into polychaete phylogeny (Annelida) inferred from 18S rDNA sequences

Annelid systematics and the ingroup relationships of polychaete annelids are matter of ongoing debates in recent analyses. For the investigation of sedentary polychaete relationships a molecular phylogenetic analysis was conducted based on 94 sequences of 18S rDNA, including unpublished sequences of 13 polychaete species. The data set was analyzed with maximum parsimony and maximum likelihood methods, as wells as Bayesian inference. As in previous molecular analyses the monophyly of many traditional polychaete families is confirmed. No evidence has been found for a possible monophyly of Canalipalpata or Scolecida. In all analyses a placement of the Echiura as a derived polychaete ingroup with a close relationship to the Capitellidae is confirmed. The orbiniids appear paraphyletic with regard to Questa. Travisia is transferred from Opheliidae to Scalibregmatidae. The remaining opheliids include a yet undescribed ctenodrilid species from Elba, whereas the other investigated ctenodrilid Ctenodrilus serratus groups with the Cirratulidae and shows a close affinity to the cirratulid genus Dodecaceria. A common ancestry of Branchiomaldane and Arenicola, which has been predicted on morphological data, is confirmed by the analysis and a sistergroup relationship between Arenicolidae and Maldanidae is also recovered. These results support our assumption that on the basis of a broader taxon sampling the phylogenetic position of controversially discussed taxa can be inferred by using 18S rDNA sequence data.     

速足目主要类群系统发育的分子证据

文章基于速足目现生主要类群18S rDNA、28S rDNA和COI基因序列,采用贝叶斯法、邻接法和最大简约法,尝试构建速足目的分子系统树;结合形态特征和化石记录,主要对速足目各超科级分类阶元的系统发育关系进行探讨。结果表明,速足目现生超科Bairdiacea、Darwinulacea、Cypridacea和Cytheracea均为单系群,支持形态学上关于上述4个超科的的界定;3种基因均支持形态学上Darwinulacea和Cypridacea具有较近的亲缘关系的观点。18S rDNA序列分析在较显著水平上支持Darwinulacea和Bairdiacea为姐妹群,Darwinulacea可能从Bairdia-cea中的一支演化而来;Bairdiacea和Darwinulacea组成的分支是Cypridacea的姐妹群,支持将三者合并为Bairdio-copina亚目的观点;Cytheracea是Cypridacea(Darwinulacea Bairdiacea)的姐妹群,可提升为Cytheracopina亚目。     

Comprehensive gene and taxon coverage elucidates radiation patterns in moths and butterflies

Lepidoptera (butterflies and moths) represent one of the most diverse animals groups. Yet, the phylogeny of advanced ditrysian Lepidoptera, accounting for about 99 per cent of lepidopteran species, has remained largely unresolved. We report a rigorous and comprehensive analysis of lepidopteran affinities. We performed phylogenetic analyses of 350 taxa representing nearly 90 per cent of lepidopteran families. We found Ditrysia to be a monophyletic taxon with the clade Tischerioidea + Palaephatoidea being the sister group of it. No support for the monophyly of the proposed major internested ditrysian clades, Apoditrysia, Obtectomera and Macrolepidoptera, was found as currently defined, but each of these is supported with some modification. The monophyly or near-monophyly of most previously identified lepidopteran superfamilies is reinforced, but several species-rich superfamilies were found to be para- or polyphyletic. Butterflies were found to be more closely related to ‘microlepidopteran’ groups of moths rather than the clade Macrolepidoptera, where they have traditionally been placed. There is support for the monophyly of Macrolepidoptera when butterflies and Calliduloidea are excluded. The data suggest that the generally short diverging nodes between major groupings in basal non-tineoid Ditrysia are owing to their rapid radiation, presumably in correlation with the radiation of flowering plants.     

Molecular phylogeny of Cicadomorpha (Insecta: Hemiptera: Cicadoidea, Cercopoidea and Membracoidea): adding evidence to the controversy

Abstract. The hemipteran infraorder Cicadomorpha comprises the superfamilies Cicadoidea (cicadas), Cercopoidea (spittlebugs or froghoppers) and Membracoidea (leafhoppers and treehoppers). Earlier attempts to determine relationships among these three monophyletic lineages using either morphological or molecular data suffered from insufficient sampling (taxonomic and data) and problematic tree rooting, leading to discordant results. Presented here are phylogenetic reconstructions within Cicadomorpha based on DNA nucleotide sequence data from multiple genetic markers (18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, and histone 3) sequenced from representative taxa of Cicadidae, Tettigarctidae, Cercopidae, Aphrophoridae, Clastopteridae, Machaerotidae, Epipygidae, Cicadellidae, Membracidae, Myerslopiidae and Aetalionidae. To test the robustness of the phylogenetic signal, these sequence data were analysed separately and in combination under various alignment parameters using both manual alignment (of both attenuated and full sequences) and alignment via clustal x . The results demonstrate clearly that, despite the alignment method used, basing a phylogeny on a single gene region is often misleading. Analyses of the combination of datasets support the major relationships within Cicadomorpha as (Membracoidea (Cicadoidea, Cercopoidea)). Internal relationships recovered within each superfamily shows evidence for: (1) the placement of Myerslopiidae as the sister group of the remaining Membracoidea; (2) the paraphyly of Cicadellidae; (3) the sister-group relationship between Machaerotidae and Clastopteridae; (4) the monophyly of Cercopidae; (5) the diversification of Epipygidae from within the possibly paraphyletic Aphrophoridae.     

Phylogenetic relationships among early-diverging eudicots based on four genes: were the eudicots ancestrally woody?

Based on analyses of combined data sets of three genes (18S rDNA, rbcL, and atpB), phylogenetic relationships among the early-diverging eudicot lineages (Ranunculales, Proteales, Trochodendraceae, Sabiaceae, and Buxaceae) remain unclear, as are relationships within Ranunculales, especially the placement of Eupteleaceae. To clarify relationships among these early-diverging eudicot lineages, we added entire sequences of 26S rDNA to the existing three-gene data set. In the combined analyses of four genes based on parsimony, ML, and Bayesian analysis, Ranunculales are strongly supported as a clade and are sister to other eudicots. Proteales appear as sister to the remaining eudicots, which are weakly (59%) supported as a clade. Relationships among Trochodendraceae, Buxaceae (including Didymeles), Sabiaceae, and Proteales remain unclear. Within Ranunculales, Eupteleaceae are sister to all other Ranunculales, with bootstrap support of 70% in parsimony analysis and with posterior probability of 1.00 in Bayesian analysis. Our character reconstructions indicate that the woody habit is ancestral, not only for the basal angiosperms, but also for the eudicots. Furthermore, Ranunculales may not be ancestrally herbaceous, as long maintained. The woody habit appears to have been ancestral for several major clades of eudicots, including Caryophyllales, and asterids.     

Initial results on the molecular phylogeny of the Nudibranchia (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) based on 18S rDNA data

This study investigated nudibranch phylogeny on the basis of 18S rDNA sequence data. 18S rDNA sequence data of 19 taxa representing the major living orders and families of the Nudibranchia were analyzed. Representatives of the Cephalaspidea, Anaspidea, Gymnomorpha, Prosobranchia, and Pulmonata were also sequenced and used as outgroups. An additional 28 gastropod sequences taken from GenBank were also included in our analyses. Phylogenetic analyses of these more than 50 gastropod taxa provide strong evidence for support of the monophyly of the Nudibranchia. The monophyly of the Doridoidea, Cladobranchia, and Aeolidoidea within the Nudibranchia are also strongly supported. Phylogenetic utility and information content of the 18S rDNA sequences for Nudibranchia, and Opisthobranchia in general, are examined using the program SplitsTree as well as phylogenetic reconstructions using distance and parsimony approaches. 0Results based on these molecular data are compared with hypotheses about nudibranch phylogeny inferred from morphological data.     

Phylogenetic signal in mitochondrial and nuclear markers in sea anemones (Cnidaria, Actiniaria)

The mitochondrial genome of basal animals is generally more slowly evolving than that of bilaterians. This difference in rate complicates the study of relationships among members of these lineages and the discovery of cryptic species or the testing of morphological species concepts within them. We explore the properties of mitochondrial and nuclear ribosomal genes in the cnidarian order Actiniaria, using both an ordinal- and familial-scale sample of taxa. Although the markers do not show significant incongruence, they differ in their phylogenetic informativeness and the kinds of relationships they resolve. Among the markers studied here, the fragments of 12S rDNA and 18S rDNA most effectively recover well-supported nodes; those of 16S rDNA and 28S rDNA are less effective. The general patterns we observed are similar to those in other hexacorallians, although Actiniaria alone show saturation of transitions for ordinal-scale analyses.     

Sequences of 72 plastid genes support the early divergence of Cornales in the asterids

Recent phylogenetic analyses of molecular data have supported different hypotheses of relationships among Cornales,Ericales,and core asterids.Such hypotheses have implications for the evolution of important morphological and embryological features of asterids.In this study we generated plastid genome-scale data of Davidia (Cornales) and Franklinia (Ericales) and combined them with published sequence data of eudicots.Our maximum parsimony,maximum likelihood,and Bayesian analyses generated strongly supported and congruent phylogenetic relationships among the three major lineages of the asterids.Cornales diverges first in asterids; Ericales is sister to the core asterids.Adding two more taxa helps mitigate long branch attraction in parsimony analyses.Sampling 26-28 plastid protein-coding genes may provide satisfactory resolution and support for relationships of eudicots including basal lineages of asterids.