Duplexed iMALDI for the detection of angiotensin I and angiotensin II

An immuno-Matrix Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization (iMALDI) method has been developed using anti-IgG beads to capture anti-AngI and anti-AngII antibodies, which are incubated with a ～50μL plasma sample to which known amounts of stable-isotope-labeled AngI and AngII have been added. After a short incubation time, the beads are washed, placed directly on a MALDI target, and analyzed by mass spectrometry (MS) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). The iMALDI assay developed can detect and quantify angiotensin I (AngI) and angiotensin II (AngII) in human plasma. This assay has a Limit of Detection (LOD) of ～10amol/μL (or ～13pg/mL AngI and ～11pg/mL AngII), at a S/N of 2:1, using only one-tenth of the antibody beads which were incubated with a 50-μL plasma sample. This LOD is within the relevant range of patient samples. Little or no angiotensin generation period is required, resulting in a rapid assay. Correlation coefficients for the standard curves are >0.99, with a linear range of 4-100fmol/μL (5-130ng/mL) and 100-2500amol/μL (106-2614pg/mL) for AngI and AngII, respectively. This duplexed assay can quantify AngI and AngII peptide levels simultaneously, in plasma from normotensive and hypertensive patients. The assay can detect changes in the levels of these peptides over time, which will allow quantitation of plasma renin and ACE activities.     

Determination of the structure of lipid vesicle-bound angiotensin II and angiotensin I

A mass spectrometry (MS)-based strategy was developed to determine the structure of lipid vesicle-bound angiotensin II (AII) and angiotensin I (AI). It involves hydrogen-deuterium exchange (HDX), chemical modifications (e.g., nitration of tyrosine, acetylation of free amino group), and ladder sequencing. HDX is also combined with tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) to provide structural details at individual amino acid residues. It was observed that a major portion of both of these peptide hormones interacts with the phospholipid head groups on the surface of the vesicles and that Tyr residue is embedded in the vesicles. Both peptides have a U-shaped structure in the lipid environment.     

Discrimination of two angiotensin II receptor subtypes with a selective agonist analogue of angiotensin II, p-aminophenylalanine6 angiotensin II

Angiotensin II receptor binding sites in rat liver and PC12 cells differ in their affinities for a nonpeptidic antagonist, DuP 753, and p-aminophenylalanine6 angiotensin II. In liver, which primarily contains the sulfhydryl reducing agent-inhibited type of angiotensin II receptor, which we refer to as the AII alpha subtype, DuP 753 displays an IC50 of 55 nM, while p-aminophenylalanine6 angiotensin II displays an IC50 of 8-9 microM. In PC12 cells, which primarily contain the angiotensin II receptor type whose binding affinity is enhanced by sulfhydryl reducing agents (AII beta), DuP 753 displays an IC50 in excess of 100 microM, while p-aminophenylalanine6 angiotensin II displays an IC50 of 12 nM. p-Aminophenylalanine6 angiotensin II binding affinity in liver is decreased in the presence of guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTP gamma S) suggesting that this analogue is an agonist.     

Competitive antagonism of pressor responses to angiotensin II and angiotensin III by the angiotensin II-1 receptor ligand losartan.

Losartan (DuP 753) and PD123177 are nonpeptide angiotensin (ANG) receptor ligands for subtypes of ANG II receptors ANG II-1 and ANG II-2, respectively. We examined the effects of losartan and PD123177 on dose - mean arterial pressure (MAP) response curves for ANG II and ANG III in eight groups (n = 6 each) of conscious rats. Saline (0.9% NaCl), losartan (1 x 10(-6) and 9 x 10(-6) mol/kg), and PD123177 (2 x 10(-5) mol/kg) were i.v. bolus injected 15 min before the construction of ANG II dose - response curves in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Groups V-VIII were treated similarly to I-IV except that ANG III was given in place of ANG II. Losartan dose dependently shifted the dose-response curves of ANG II and ANG III to the right with similar dissociation constants (-log KI of 6.6 +/- 0.7 and 6.6 +/- 0.1 mol/kg, respectively) and no change in the maxima. PD123177 affected neither maximum MAP nor ED50 values for ANG II or ANG III. Our results show that losartan but not PD123177 is a competitive antagonist of the MAP effects of ANG II and ANG III.     

Differential response of human cardiac fibroblasts to angiotensin I and angiotensin II

The vasoactive peptide angiotensin II (Ang II) has been implicated as a mediator of myocardial fibrosis. We carried out a comparative investigation of the effects of Ang II and its precursor Ang I on collagen metabolism and proliferation in cultured human cardiac fibroblasts. Cardiac fibroblasts responded to both Ang I and Ang II with concentration-dependent increases in collagen synthesis but no proliferation. The stimulatory effect of Ang II was abolished by the AT(1) receptor antagonist losartan but not the AT(2) receptor antagonist PD123319. The response to Ang I was not affected by either antagonist, nor by the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor captopril. In conclusion, Both Ang I and Ang II stimulate collagen synthesis of human cardiac fibroblasts, the effect of Ang II occurring via the AT(1) receptor whilst Ang I appears to exert a direct effect through non-Ang II-dependent mechanisms. These results suggest distinct roles for angiotensin peptides in the development of cardiac fibrosis.     

Effects of angiotensin analogues and angiotensin receptor antagonists on paraventricular neurones.

In a previous study we observed that most neurones in the paraventricular nucleus are excited by angiotensin-(1-7). In comparison with angiotensin III this excitatory action was significantly delayed. The aim of the present microiontophoretic study of angiotensin II-sensitive rat paraventricular neurones was to compare the effect of the angiotensin-analogues angiotensin-(1-7), angiotensin-(2-7), angiotensin II and angiotensin III on the spontaneous activity of these neurones and to test angiotensin receptor subtype 1 antagonists (CGP 46027 or DuP 753) and subtype 2 selective antagonists (CGP 42112A and PD 123177) in order to acquire more evidence of the receptor subtype present. As previously observed angiotensin II, angiotensin III and angiotensin-(1-7) excited most neurones. The effect of angiotensin-(1-7) was usually weaker than that of angiotensin II, and in contrast to angiotensin III the latencies were not significantly different. Angiotensin-(1-7) seemed to be active by itself, because its effect was antagonised by angiotensin receptor antagonists. Angiotensin-(2-7) was mostly inactive, although a few cells were excited. Whereas the excitatory effects of angiotensin-(1-7), angiotensin II and angiotensin III could always be inhibited with both angiotensin receptor subtype antagonists 1 and 2, that produced by angiotensin-(2-7) was only weakly antagonised, if at all. Subtype 1 selective antagonists were effective at lower concentrations than selective subtype 2 antagonists.     

Mouse mast cell protease-1 cleaves angiotensin I to form angiotensin II

The ability to convert angiotensin (Ang) I to Ang II was compared between human alpha-chymase and two mouse beta-chymases, mouse mast cell protease (mMCP)-1 and mMCP-4. Human chymase hydrolyzed Ang I to produce Ang II without further degradation. mMCP-1 similarly generated Ang II from Ang I in a time-dependent manner and the formation of the fragment other than Ang II was marginal. In contrast, mMCP-4 hydrolyzed Ang I at two sites, Tyr(4)-Ile(5) and Phe(8)-His(9), with Ang II formation being tentative. Consistently, mMCP-4 but not human chymase hydrolyzed Ang II and mMCP-1 showed little hydrolytic activity against Ang II. These data suggest that not only human chymase but also mMCP-1 might possess a physiological role in Ang II formation. Our findings also imply that the Ang-converting activity of chymase may not be related to the categorization of chymase into alpha- or beta-type based on their primary structure.     

Renal vascular tachyphylaxis to angiotensin II: Specificity of the response for angiotensin

Hypotheses concerning angiotensin's role in states characterized by severe and sustained renal vasoconstriction, must account for the poorly sustained renal response to this agent in healthy animals and man. To assess the specificity of renal vascular tachyphylaxis to angiotensin II (AII), renal blood flow was measured with an electromagnetic flowmeter in eight anesthetized dogs. Bolus injections of AII and norepinephrine into the renal artery were adjusted to produce at least a 50% reduction in renal blood flow, and were followed by a continuous infusion of AII sufficient to reduce renal blood flow acutely by 60 ± 10%. The response to the continuous infusion was poorly sustained, blood flow returning to near baseline within 10 minutes: At this time the response to bolus administration of AII was lost, but the response to norepinephrine was sustained. At 30 minutes the response to norepinephrine was also reduced, and there was no response in three of the eight dogs. After stopping the AII infusion, renal vascular responsiveness to norepinephrine returned almost immediately, but 30–60 minutes were required before responsiveness to AII was restored. We conclude that there is true, specific renal vascular tachyphylaxis to AII--which may well reflect receptor modulation or occupation--and that with time an additional, non-specific vasodilator mechanism can come into play.