Hidden symmetry of the genetic code and laws of amino acid interaction]

Natural amino acids having common antiamino acids are divided into families and groups according to the algorithm of the genetic code (a-n-n-a, amino acid-codon-anticodon-antiamino acid). Members of these groups are placed symmetrically in the structure of the genetic code. In the course of evolution, those point mutations are predominantly accepted retained. In homologous proteins of phylogenetically related organisms which lend to amino acids belonging to one family or group and having common antiamino acids. This assumption is in agreement with L. B. Mekler's theory (1969) of the amino acid interaction code a-a.     

Asymmetry in the symmetric structure of the genetic code]

The genetic code is characterized by hidden symmetry. Amino acids possessing common antiamino acids are located symmetrically in the graphic models of the code. There is only one exception--apolar amino acids V, M, I, L and F are asymmetrically arranged. Asymmetric disposition of these amino acids is apparently due to divergence in the course of structural evolution of amino acid families as a result of inclusion of new members into the coding system.     

Evolution of the aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases and the origin of the genetic code

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases exist as two enzyme families which were apparently generated by divergent evolution from two primordial synthetases. The two classes of enzymes exhibit intriguing familial relationships, in that they are distributed nonrandomly within the codon-amino acid matrix of the genetic code. For example, all XCX codons code for amino acids handled by class II synthetases, and all but one of the XUX codons code for amino acids handled by class I synthetases. One interpretation of these patterns is that the synthetases coevolved with the genetic code. The more likely explanation, however, is that the synthetases evolved in the context of an already-established genetic code—a code which developed earlier in an RNA world. The rules which governed the development of the genetic code, and led to certain patterns in the coding catalog between codons and amino acids, would also have governed the subsequent evolution of the synthetases in the context of a fixed code, leading to patterns in synthetase distribution such as those observed. These rules are (1) conservative evolution of amino acid and adapter binding sites and (2) minimization of the disruptive effects on protein structure caused by codon meaning changes.     

Evolution of the Genetic Code by Incorporation of Amino Acids that Improved or Changed Protein Function

Fifty years have passed since the genetic code was deciphered, but how the genetic code came into being has not been satisfactorily addressed. It is now widely accepted that the earliest genetic code did not encode all 20 amino acids found in the universal genetic code as some amino acids have complex biosynthetic pathways and likely were not available from the environment. Therefore, the genetic code evolved as pathways for synthesis of new amino acids became available. One hypothesis proposes that early in the evolution of the genetic code four amino acids—valine, alanine, aspartic acid, and glycine—were coded by GNC codons (N = any base) with the remaining codons being nonsense codons. The other sixteen amino acids were subsequently added to the genetic code by changing nonsense codons into sense codons for these amino acids. Improvement in protein function is presumed to be the driving force behind the evolution of the code, but how improved function was achieved by adding amino acids has not been examined. Based on an analysis of amino acid function in proteins, an evolutionary mechanism for expansion of the genetic code is described in which individual coded amino acids were replaced by new amino acids that used nonsense codons differing by one base change from the sense codons previously used. The improved or altered protein function afforded by the changes in amino acid function provided the selective advantage underlying the expansion of the genetic code. Analysis of amino acid properties and functions explains why amino acids are found in their respective positions in the genetic code.     

Genetic code redundancy and the evolutionary stability of protein secondary structure

The genetic code has an inherent bias towards some amino acids because of the variable number of synonymous codons per amino acid. The extent to which these biases are expressed in protein secondary structure is described through the analysis of the overall amino acid compositions of the alpha-helix, beta-sheet, beta-turn and random coil segments elucidated by X-ray crystallography. Given the concept of neutral mutation in proteins, the allocation of synonyms in the genetic code appears to protect secondary structures from amino acid changes and discourages the appearance of chemically complex residues. The level of protection is similar for each structural form, despite their clear preferences for certain amino acids. The organization of the code is therefore relevant to the preservation of conformation seen in the evolution of many protein families.     

Polarity and hydropathic properties of natural amino acids

A new classification of amino acids according to their polarity and symmetric location in the spatial structure of the genetic code is suggested. The polar amino acids are: R, S (codons AGC and AGU), K, N, Q, H, W, C, Y, G, E, D; apolar ones are: T, M, I, P, L, S (codons UCN). Polar and apolar amino acids are grouped into three families whose members possess complementarity with respect to the symmetric structure of the genetic code. Interaction of these complementary polar and apolar amino acids encodes formation of the space structures and ligand-receptor complexes of proteins. Correlation between the polar and hydropathic properties of amino acids is investigated. Normalization of 38 hydrophobicity scales of natural amino acids is carried out. A discrepancy between structures of polar/hydrophilic and apolar/hydrophobic groups of amino acids is demonstrated. According to the signature principle this discrepancy is due to different properties of amino acid side radicals which, in turn, depend on the second component of the reaction and on environmental conditions.     

Code dependent conservation of the physico-chemical properties in amino acid substitutions

The frequency of amino acid replacements in families of typical proteins has been elegantly analyzed by Argyle (1980) showing that the most frequent replacements involve a conservation of the amino acid chemical properties. The cyclic arrangement of the twenty amino acids resulting from the most frequent replacements has been described as an amino acid chemical ring. In this work, a novel amino acid replacement frequency ring is proposed, for which a conservation of over 90% of the most general physico-chemical properties can be deduced. The amino acid chemical similarity ring is also analyzed in terms of the genetic code base probability changes, showing that the discrepancy that exists between the standard deviation value of the amino acid replacement frequency matrix and its respective ideal value is almost equal to that deduced from the corresponding base codon replacement probability matrices. These differences are finally evaluated and discussed in terms of the restrictions imposed by the structure of the genetic code and the physico-chemical dissimilarities between some codons of amino acids which are chemically similar.     

Stability of the genetic code and optimal parameters of amino acids

The standard genetic code is known to be much more efficient in minimizing adverse effects of misreading errors and one-point mutations in comparison with a random code having the same structure, i.e. the same number of codons coding for each particular amino acid. We study the inverse problem, how the code structure affects the optimal physico-chemical parameters of amino acids ensuring the highest stability of the genetic code. It is shown that the choice of two or more amino acids with given properties determines unambiguously all the others. In this sense the code structure determines strictly the optimal parameters of amino acids or the corresponding scales may be derived directly from the genetic code. In the code with the structure of the standard genetic code the resulting values for hydrophobicity obtained in the scheme “leave one out” and in the scheme with fixed maximum and minimum parameters correlate significantly with the natural scale. The comparison of the optimal and natural parameters allows assessing relative impact of physico-chemical and error-minimization factors during evolution of the genetic code. As the resulting optimal scale depends on the choice of amino acids with given parameters, the technique can also be applied to testing various scenarios of the code evolution with increasing number of codified amino acids. Our results indicate the co-evolution of the genetic code and physico-chemical properties of recruited amino acids.     

Genetic Code Evolution Started with the Incorporation of Glycine,Followed by Other Small Hydrophilic Amino Acids

We propose that glycine was the first amino acid to be incorporated into the genetic code, followed by serine, aspartic and/or glutamic acid—small hydrophilic amino acids that all have codons in the bottom right-hand corner of the standard genetic code table. Because primordial ribosomal synthesis is presumed to have been rudimentary, this stage would have been characterized by the synthesis of short, water-soluble peptides, the first of which would have comprised polyglycine. Evolution of the code is proposed to have occurred by the duplication and mutation of tRNA sequences, which produced a radiation of codon assignment outwards from the bottom right-hand corner. As a result of this expansion, we propose a trend from small hydrophilic to hydrophobic amino acids, with selection for longer polypeptides requiring a hydrophobic core for folding and stability driving the incorporation of hydrophobic amino acids into the code.     

Code dependent conservation of the physicochemical properties in amino acid substitutions

The frequency of amino acid replacements in families of typical proteins has been elegantly analyzed by Argyle (1980) showing that the most frequent replacements involve a conservation of the amino acid chemical properties. The cyclic arrangement of the twenty amino acids resulting from the most frequent replacements has been described as an amino acid chemical ring.In this work, a novel amino acid replacement frequency ring is proposed, for which a conservation of over 90% of the most general physico-chemical properties can be deduced.The amino acid chemical similarity ring is also analyzed in terms of the genetic code base probability changes, showing that the discrepancy that exists between the standard deviation value of the amino acid replacement frequency matrix and its respective ideal value is almost equal to that deduced from the corresponding base codon replacement probability matrices. These differences are finally evaluated and discussed in terms of the restrictions imposed by the structure of the genetic code and the physico-chemical dissimilarities between some codons of amino acids which are chemically similar.This work was partially supported by OEA and Departamento de Desarrollo de la Investigación.     

Protein evolution drives the evolution of the genetic code and vice versa

A model for the developmental pathway of the genetic code, grounded on group theory and the thermodynamics of codon-anticodon interaction is presented. At variance with previous models, it takes into account not only the optimization with respect to amino acid attributes but, also physicochemical constraints and initial conditions. A 'simple-first' rule is introduced after ranking the amino acids with respect to two current measures of chemical complexity. It is shown that a primeval code of only seven amino acids is enough to build functional proteins. It is assumed that these proteins drive the further expansion of the code. The proposed primeval code is compared with surrogate codes randomly generated and with another proposal for primeval code found in the literature. The departures from the 'universal' code, observed in many organisms and cellular compartments, fit naturally in the proposed evolutionary scheme. A strong correlation is found between, on one side, the two classes of aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases, and on the other, the amino acids grouped by end-atom-type and by codon type. An inverse of Davydov's rules, to associate the amino acid end atoms (O/N and non-O/non-N) of 18 amino acids with codons containing a weak base (A/U), extended to the 20 amino acids, is derived.     

The joint evolution of defence and inducibility against natural enemies

The aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases (aaRSs) ensure the fidelity of the translation of the genetic code, covalently attaching appropriate amino acids to the corresponding nucleic acid adaptor molecules-tRNA. The fundamental role of aminoacylation reaction catalysed by aaRSs implies that representatives of the family are thought to be among the earliest proteins to appear. Based on sequence analysis and catalytic domain structure, aaRSs have been partitioned into two classes of 10 enzymes each. However, based on the structural and sequence data only, it will not be easily understood that the present partitioning is not governed by chance. Our findings suggest that organization of amino acid biosynthetic pathways and clustering of aaRSs into different classes are intimately related to one another. A plausible explanation for such a relationship is dictated by early link between aaRSs and amino acids biosynthetic proteins. The aaRSs catalytic cores are highly relevant to the ancient metabolic reactions, namely, amino acids and cofactors biosynthesis. In particular we show that class II aaRSs mostly associated with the primordial amino acids, while class I aaRSs are usually related to amino acids evolved lately. Reasoning from this we propose a possible chronology of genetic code evolution.     

The direct genetic encoding of pyrrolysine

Pyrrolysine is an amino acid encoded by the amber codon in genes required for methylamine utilization by members of the Methanosarcinaceae. Pyrrolysine and selenocysteine share the distinction of being the only two non-canonical amino acids that have entered natural genetic codes. Recent experiments have shown that encoding of pyrrolysine, unlike that of selenocysteine, also shares an important trait of the original set of twenty amino acids. UAG is translated as pyrrolysine with the participation of a dedicated aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase. Expression of the genes encoding the pyrrolysyl-tRNA synthetase and its cognate tRNA is sufficient to add pyrrolysine to the genetic code of a recombinant organism. Thus, the recruitment of pyrrolysine into the genetic code involved evolution of the first non-canonical aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase and cognate tRNA to be described from nature.     

Physico-chemical basis of the genetic code origin: stereochemical analysis of interactions of amino acids and nucleotides based on the progene hypothesis

A progene hypothesis has been proposed earlier to explain the mechanism of origin of the self-reproducing genetic system. Progenes (precursors of the genetic system) are mixed anhydrides of an amino acid and deoxyribotrinucleotide at the 3'-gamma-terminal phosphate (NpNpNppp-AA); they are produced from dinucleotides (NpNp) and 3'-gamma-aminoacylnucleotidylates (Nppp-AA) as a result of specific interaction between amino acid and dinucleotide. The postulated mechanism of progene formation accounts for the selection of substances, including chirality, the origin of the genetic code as well as for the mechanisms of formation, self-reproduction and evolution of the simpliest genetic system ("gene--polypeptide"). A stereochemical analysis of the progene formation mechanism has allowed us to support the main statements of the hypothesis that relate to the origin of the genetic code and to selection of substances. Atomic groups that could be responsible for the specificity of interaction between dinucleotides and amino acids in progene formation have been revealed. Stereochemical evidence for the physicochemical basis of the origin of the existing genetic code have been produced: 1) a special role of the second nucleotide in the codon is demonstrated in amino acid coding by the progene hypothesis principle; 2) an advantage of T against U in such coding is demonstrated; 3) for 16 amino acids out of 20 an agreement has been obtained between the optimal dinucleotide as revealed by the stereochemical analysis and the codon dinucleotides; 4) an explanation for the third nucleotide selection mechanism is offered. A restoration of the prebiotic code, based on these results, has indicated that the code contains 32 codons, is statistical and group-wise. It encodes 7 groups of isofunctional amino acids: 3 overlapping groups of non-polar amino acids 1) medium-size hydrophobic amino acids (chiefly Val, n-Val and a-But), 2) small and medium-size non-polar amino acids (chiefly Ala Val, n-Val a-But and Gly), 3) small non-polar amino acids (Gly, Ala, a-But) and 4 groups of polar amino acids--1) hydroxy--+dicarbonic (Asp, Glu, Ser and Thr), 2) dicarbonic (Asp and Glu), 3) hydroxy (Ser and Thr) and 4) basic (Arg and Lys). The code includes about 20 amino acids among which are 15-17 canonical and a few common non-canonical. The prebiotic code explains many properties of the existing genetic code and is capable of evolving into the latter by way of a gradual replacement of the physicochemical coding mechanism by the enzymatic coding mechanism.     

The Level and Landscape of Optimization in the Origin of the Genetic Code

We consider a model of the origin of genetic code organization incorporating the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids and their physicochemical properties. We study the behavior of the genetic code in the set of codes subject both to biosynthetic constraints and to the constraint that the biosynthetic classes of amino acids must occupy only their own codon domain, as observed in the genetic code. Therefore, this set contains the smallest number of elements ever analyzed in similar studies. Under these conditions and if, as predicted by physicochemical postulates, the amino acid properties played a fundamental role in genetic code organization, it can be expected that the code must display an extremely high level of optimization. This prediction is not supported by our analysis, which indicates, for instance, a minimization percentage of only 80%. These observations can therefore be more easily explained by the coevolution theory of genetic code origin, which postulates a role that is important but not fundamental for the amino acid properties in the structuring of the code. We have also investigated the shape of the optimization landscape that might have arisen during genetic code origin. Here, too, the results seem to favor the coevolution theory because, for instance, the fact that only a few amino acid exchanges would have been sufficient to transform the genetic code (which is not a local minimum) into a much better optimized code, and that such exchanges did not actually take place, seems to suggest that, for instance, the reduction of translation errors was not the main adaptive theme structuring the genetic code.     

A new hypothesis on the evolution of the genetic code

Summary Starting from the assumption that specific steric and energetic interactions between amino acids and their respective anticodons could exist, the evolution of the genetic code is deduced from purely chemical and physical reasons. In this model the amino acids are intercalated between the two first anticodon bases and their carbon bound hydrogen atoms are assumed to penetrate into the electron clouds of the bases. By these means a gain in energy and a fixation of the amino acid is obtained in such a way that the anticodon nucleotides could be determinant for the nature of the amino acids.     

The Historical Factor: The Biosynthetic Relationships Between Amino Acids and Their Physicochemical Properties in the Origin of the Genetic Code

Two forces are in general, hypothesized to have influenced the origin of the organization of the genetic code: the physicochemical properties of amino acids and their biosynthetic relationships. In view of this, we have considered a model incorporating these two forces. In particular, we have studied the optimization level of the physicochemical properties of amino acids in the set of amino acid permutation codes that respects the biosynthetic relationships between amino acids. Where the properties of amino acids are represented by polarity and molecular volume we obtain indetermination percentages in the organization of the genetic code of approximately 40%. This indicates that the contingent factor played a significant role in structuring the genetic code. Furthermore, this result is in agreement with the genetic code coevolution hypothesis, which attributes a merely ancillary role to the properties of amino acids while it suggests that it was their biosynthetic relationships that organized the code. Furthermore, this result does not favor the stereochemical models proposed to explain the origin of the genetic code. On the other hand, where the properties of amino acids are represented by polarity alone, we obtain an indetermination percentage of at least 21.5%. This might suggest that the polarity distances played an important role and would therefore provide evidence in favor of the physicochemical hypothesis of genetic code origin. Although, overall, the analysis might have given stronger support to the latter hypothesis, this did not actually occur. The results are therefore discussed in the context of the different theories proposed to explain the origin of the genetic code. Received: 10 September 1996 / Accepted: 3 March 1997     

On the origin and evolution of the genetic code

Two ideas have essentially been used to explain the origin of the genetic code: Crick's frozen accident and Woese's amino acid-codon specific chemical interaction. Whatever the origin and codon-amino acid correlation, it is difficult to imagine the sudden appearance of the genetic code in its present form of 64 codons coding for 20 amino acids without appealing to some evolutionary process. On the contrary, it is more reasonable to assume that it evolved from a much simpler initial state in which a few triplets were coding for each of a small number of amino acids. Analysis of genetic code through information theory and the metabolism of pyrimidine biosynthesis provide evidence that suggests that the genetic code could have begun in an RNA world with the two letters A and U grouped in eight triplets coding for seven amino acids and one stop signal. This code could have progressively evolved by making gradual use of letters G and C to end with 64 triplets coding for 20 amino acids and three stop signals. According to proposed evidence, DNA could have appeared after the four-letter structure was already achieved. In the newborn DNA world, T substituted U to get higher physicochemical and genetic stability.     

Protein evolution within and between species

Protein evolution can be seen as the successive replacement of amino acids by other amino acids. In general, it is a very slow process which is triggered by point mutations in the nucleotide sequence. These mutations can transform into single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) within populations and diverging proteins between species. It is well known that in many cases amino acids can be replaced by others without impeding the functioning of the protein, even if these are of quite different physico-chemical character. In some cases, however, almost any replacement would result in a functionally deficient protein. Based upon comprehensive published SNP data and applying correlation analysis we quantified the two antagonist factors controlling the process of amino acid replacement and thus protein evolution: First, the degenerate structure of the genetic code which facilitates the exchange of certain amino acids and, second, the physico-chemical forces which limit the range of possible exchanges to maintain a functional protein. We found that the observed frequencies of amino acid exchanges within species are best explained by the genetic code and that the conservation of physico-chemical properties plays a subordinate role, but has nevertheless to be considered as a key factor. Between moderately diverged species genetic code and physico-chemical properties exert comparable influence on amino acid exchanges. We furthermore studied amino acid exchanges in more detail for six species (four mammals, one bird, and one insect) and found that the profiles are highly correlated across all examined species despite their large evolutionary divergence of up to 800 million years. The species specific exchange profiles are also correlated to the exchange profile observed between different species. The currently available huge body of SNP data allows to characterize the role of two major shaping forces of protein evolution more quantitatively than before.