Transformation of calf uterine progesterone receptor: analysis of the process when receptor is bound to progesterone and RU38486

Effects of different transforming agents were examined on the sedimentation characteristics of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR) bound to the synthetic progestin [3H]R5020 or the known progesterone antagonist [3H]RU38486 (RU486). [3H]R5020-receptor complexes [progesterone-receptor complexes (PRc)] sedimented as fast migrating 8S moieties in 8-30% linear glycerol gradients containing 0.15 M KCl and 20 mM Na2MoO4. Incubation of cytosol containing [3H]PRc at 23 degrees C for 10-60 min, or at 0 degrees C with 0.15-0.3 M KCl or 1-10 mM ATP, caused a gradual transformation of PRc to a slow sedimenting 4S form. This 8S to 4S transformation was molybdate sensitive. In contrast, the [3H]RU486-receptor complex exhibited only the 8S form. Treatment with all three activation agents caused a decrease in the 8S form but no concomitant transformation of the [3H]RU486-receptor complex into the 4S form. PR in the calf uterine cytosol incubated at 23 or at 0 degrees C with 0.3 M KCl or 10 mM ATP could be subsequently complexed with [3H]R5020 to yield the 4S form of PR. However, the cytosol PR transformed in the absence of any added ligand failed to bind [3H]RU486. Heat treatment of both [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes caused an increase in DNA-cellulose binding, although the extent of this binding was lower when RU486 was bound to receptors. An aqueous two-phase partitioning analysis revealed a significant change in the surface properties of PR following both binding to ligand and subsequent transformation. The partition coefficient (Kobsd) of the heat-transformed [3H]R5020-receptor complex increased about 5-fold over that observed with PR at 0 degrees C.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effects of antiestrogen versus antiprogestin on transformed and nontransformed steroid receptors

In order to determine if different physicochemical properties exist among antihormone-receptor complexes, we have compared the interaction of the antiprogestin RU486 with progesterone receptor (PR) versus the triphenylethylene antiestrogen H1285 (4-(N,N-diethyl-aminoethoxy)-4'-methoxy-alpha-(p-hydroxyphenyl-alp ha'- ethylstilbene] with estrogen receptor (ER) from rabbit uterine tissue. Contrary to other reports, we observed no difference in the sedimentation properties of transformed PR (4S) when bound by the antagonist RU486 versus the progesterone agonist R5020 in either cytosol or DEAE partially-purified receptor preparations analyzed on sucrose gradients containing 0.3 M KCl. In addition, we found no difference in the sedimentation properties of these receptor preparations in the presence of 10 mM sodium molybdate: the nontransformed RU486-PR and nontransformed R5020-PR both sedimented as a 6S species. These same results were obtained when the receptor preparation and gradient analysis were performed in the absence of monothioglycerol. Likewise, there was no change in the sedimentation properties of the transformed PR when the receptor, partially purified in the absence of molybdate, was analyzed on sucrose gradients containing 10 mM sodium molybdate to prevent receptor alteration during centrifugation. From DNA-cellulose assays performed with partially purified PR in the absence of molybdate we determined that the 4S form of R5020-PR and RU486-PR is transformed receptor; whereas in the presence of molybdate, the 6S species is nontransformed. In contrast, we found a different pattern of sedimentation when comparing transformed antiestrogen-receptor complexes with transformed estrogen-receptor complexes. In this case, transformed H1285-ER sedimented as 6S and estradiol-ER sedimented as 4S. We conclude from these experiments that these two antihormones, RU486 and H1285, may have different mechanisms of action in their antagonism of steroid hormone action. Antiestrogen stabilizes the salt-transformed ER as a dimer while antiprogestin appears to permit dissociation of the oligomeric form of the receptor to the monomeric form.     

Characterization of R5020 and RU486 binding to progesterone receptor from calf uterus

We have examined and compared the binding characteristics of the progesterone agonist R5020 [promegestone, 17,21-dimethylpregna-4,9(10)-diene-3,20-dione] and the progesterone antagonist RU486 [mifepristone, 17 beta-hydroxy-11 beta-[4-(dimethylamino) phenyl]-17 alpha-(prop-1-ynyl)-estra-4,9-dien-3-one] in calf uterine cytosol. Both steroids bound cytosol macromolecule(s) with high affinity, exhibiting Kd values of 5.6 and 3.6 nM for R5020 and RU486 binding, respectively. The binding of the steroids to the macromolecule(s) was rapid at 4 degrees C, showing saturation of binding sites at 1-2 h for [3H]progesterone and 2-4 h for both [3H]R5020 and [3H]RU486. Addition of molybdate and glycerol to cytosol increased the extent of [3H]R5020 binding. The extent of [3H]RU486 binding remained unchanged in the presence of molybdate, whereas glycerol had an inhibitory effect. Molybdate alone or in combination with glycerol stabilized the [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes at 37 degrees C. Although the rate of association of [3H]RU486 with the cytosolic macromolecule was slower than that of [3H]R5020, its dissociation from the ligand-macromolecule complex was significantly slower than [3H]R5020. Competitive steroid binding analysis revealed that [3H]progesterone, [3H]R5020, and [3H]RU486 compete for the same site(s) in the uterine cytosol, suggesting that all three bind to the progesterone receptor (PR). Sedimentation rate analysis showed that both steroids were bound to a molecule that sediments in the 8S region. The 8S [3H]R5020 and [3H]RU486 peaks were abolished by excess radioinert progesterone, RU486, or R5020.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Mammalian progesterone receptor shows differential sensitivity to sulfhydryl group modifying agents when bound to agonist and antagonist ligands

Modulation of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR), in relation to its binding to synthetic steroids with known agonist (R5020) and antagonist (RU486) properties, was studied in the presence of iodoacetamide (IA), N-ethylmaleimide (NEM), beta-mercaptoethanol (MER), and dithiothreitol (DTT). Pretreatment of uterine cytosol at 4 degrees C with NEM (4-10 mM) reduced the binding of [3H]RU486 to PR by 40%, but [3H] R5020 binding was completely abolished. Whereas IA (2-10 mM) treatment did not affect [3H]RU486 binding, [3H]R5020 binding was totally eliminated. DTT or MER increased the binding of both steroids slightly (15%). [3H]R5020- or [3H]RU486-receptor complexes (Rc) migrated in the 8 S region and were eliminated upon pretreatment with NEM. At 23 degrees C, DTT increased the amount of 4 S [3H]R5020-Rc, but had no effect on the [3H]RU486-Rc. In the control, [3H]RU486 binding to the 8 S PR could be competed with radioinert R5020 or RU486, but R5020 failed to compete in the presence of IA. The heat-treated [3H]R5020- and [3H]RU486-Rc showed reduced binding to DNA-cellulose in the presence of NEM and IA. The results of our study suggest that SH group modifications differentially influence the properties of mammalian PR complexed with either R5020 or RU486. In the presence of IA, the [3H]RU486-Rc remained in the 8 S form when incubated at 23 degrees C, indicating that RU486 binding causes conformational changes in PR which are distinct from those that result upon R5020 binding.     

Novel antiprogestins Org 31806 and 31710: interaction with mammalian progesterone receptor and DNA binding of antisteroid receptor complexes.

We have examined steroid binding parameters and transformation of calf uterine progesterone receptor (PR) liganded with progestins (progesterone and R5020) and the newly synthesized antiprogestins (Org 31806 and 31710). Species specificity analysis indicated that [3H]R5020 binding in the chicken oviduct cytosol could be eliminated in the presence of 100-fold excess radioinert progesterone and R5020 but not Org 31806 and 31710. In the calf uterine cytosol, the progestins and the antiprogestins appeared to interact with the same PR as revealed by the displacement of [3H]R5020 by all of the above steroids. When the extent of [3H]R5020 binding was examined in the presence of different concentrations of radioinert steroids, the relative affinity with which these compounds interacted with the uterine PR was found to be comparable. A 23 degrees C incubation of cytosol transformed the progestin-bound PR complexes increasing their binding to DNA-cellulose from 5 (0 degrees C, nontransformed) to 35%. Under these conditions, 20% Org 31710- and RU486-occupied PR complexes bound to DNA-cellulose whereas only 10% Org 31806-receptor complexes were retained by the resin. Transformation (23 degrees C) of cytosol receptor caused a loss of the larger 8 S form and an increase in the smaller 4 S form. In its unliganded state or when it was complexed with R5020 or the antiprogestins, incubation of PR at 23 degrees C led to dissociation of the receptor-associated 90 kDa heat-shock protein (hsp90). The PR-hsp90 association was stabilized in the presence of 10 mM iodoacetamide when the ligand binding site was occupied by Org 31806 and 31710. The R5020-receptor complexes, however, allowed release of hsp90 under the above transforming conditions. Our results indicate that although Org 31806 and 31710 show no affinity for the avian PR, these steroids interact with the mammalian PR. We propose that the reported antiprogestational effects of Org 31806 and 31710 are mediated via their interaction with PR which appears similar to one that exists between PR and RU486.     

Effects of the steroid antagonist RU486 on dimerization of the human progesterone receptor.

We previously reported, using a coimmunoprecipitation assay, that the B form (PR-B) of the human progesterone receptor from T47D human breast cancer cells dimerizes in solution with the A receptor (PR-A) and that the extent of dimerization correlates with receptor binding activity for specific DNA sequences [DeMarzo, A.M., Beck, C.A., O?ate, S.A., & Edwards, D.P. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 88, 72-76]. This suggested that solution dimerization is an intermediate step in the receptor activation process. The present study has tested the effects of the progesterone antagonist RU486 on solution dimerization of progesterone receptors (PR). As determined by the coimmunoprecipitation assay, RU486 binding did not impair dimerization of receptors; rather, the antagonist promoted more efficient solution dimerization than the progestin agonist R5020. This enhanced receptor dimerization correlated with a higher DNA binding activity for transformed receptors bound with RU486. RU486 has been shown previously to produce two other alterations in the human PR when compared with R5020. PR-RU486 complexes in solution exhibit a faster sedimentation rate (6 S) on salt-containing sucrose density gradients than PR-R5020 complexes (4 S), and PR-DNA complexes have a faster electrophoretic mobility on gel-shift assays in the presence of RU486. We presently show that the 6 S PR-RU486 complex is a receptor monomer, not a dimer. The increased sedimentation rate and increased mobility on gel-shift assays promoted by RU486 were also observed with recombinant PR-A and PR-B separately expressed in insect cells from baculovirus vectors. These results suggest that RU486 induces a distinct conformational change both in PR monomers in solution and in dimers bound to DNA. We also examined whether conformational changes in PR induced by RU486 would prevent a PR polypeptide bound to RU486 from heterodimerization with another PR polypeptide bound to R5020. To evaluate this, PR-A and PR-B that were separately bound to R5020 or RU486 in whole cells were mixed in vitro. PR-A-RU486 was capable of dimerization with PR-B-R5020, and this was demonstrated for heterodimers both formed in solution and bound to specific DNA. The capability to form heterodimers in vitro raises the possibility that the antagonist action of RU486 in vivo could in part be imposed in a dominant negative fashion through heterodimerization between one receptor subunit bound to an agonist and another bound to RU486.     

Estrogen-inducible progesterone receptor in primary cultures of rat glial cells

The presence of an estrogen-inducible progesterone receptor was demonstrated in primary cultures of newborn rat glial cells by biochemical and immunohistochemical techniques. The progesterone receptor (PR) was measured 3-4 weeks after primary culture in estradiol-containing or control medium. Cells were labeled with the synthetic progestin [3H]R5020 followed by ultracentrifugation analysis of the cellular extracts. A "9 S" PR was observed in the cytosol and a "4-5 S" PR was found in the nuclear high salt, tungstate ions containing extract of estradiol-treated cells. When the antiprogestin [3H]RU486 was used instead of [3H]R5020 as a ligand, a 9 S PR was also found in the cytosol, but a nonactivated "8.5 S" receptor complex was identified in the high salt nuclear fraction in presence of tungstate ions. The levels of PR, as measured by whole cell assay, were significantly increased when glial cells were cultured in the presence of 50 nM estradiol, as compared to nonestradiol-treated controls. The estrogen induction of PR was suppressed by the antiestrogen tamoxifen, but tamoxifen by itself had no effect on PR concentration. When the glucocorticosteroid receptor and PR were measured in parallel after estradiol treatment of the same primary culture, only the levels of PR were increased. The PR was visualized inside glial cells by immunohistochemical studies with a monoclonal antibody specific for the B-form of PR (KC 146), which was recognized by fluorescein-linked or biotinylated secondary antibodies. Strong staining was observed in estradiol-treated cultures, when compared to a weaker staining in control cultures. This is the first demonstration of PR in rat glial cells, and we present evidence of its induction by estradiol in primary cultures.     

ZK98299--a new antiprogesterone: biochemical characterization of steroid binding parameters in the calf uterine cytosol.

We have examined steroid binding characteristics of a newly synthesized antisteroid, ZK98299 [onapristone, 11 beta-(4-dimethylaminophenyl)-17 alpha-hydroxy-17 beta-(3-hydroxypropyl)- 13 alpha-methyl-4,9-gonadien-3-one], in the calf uterus cytosol and compared the nature of this interaction with the binding of progesterone receptor (PR) agonist R5020 [promegestone, 17,21-dimethylpregna-4,9-diene-3,20-dione]. In the freshly prepared cytosol, [3H]ZK98299 interacted specifically with a macromolecule: the binding was abolished in the presence of excess progestins (R5020 and progesterone) and the antiprogesterone ZK98299. The high affinity (Kd = 2.5 nM) interaction between [3H]ZK98299 and PR was temperature- and time-dependent, reaching an optimum by 2-3 h at 0 degrees C, and was facilitated by 20 mM Na2MoO4. Under nontransforming conditions, [3H]ZK98299-receptor complexes sedimented as 8 S species in 8-30% linear glycerol gradients. Upon salt or thermal transformation, there was a loss of the 8 S form, with only a small fraction of total complexes (5-7%) binding to DNA-cellulose. In contrast, transformed [3H]R5020-receptor complexes exhibited a greater extent of binding (25-55%) to DNA-cellulose. [3H]ZK98299-receptor complexes could be resolved into two ionic species over DEAE-Sephacel following incubation of the complexes at 0 or 23 degrees C. [3H]ZK98299 binding was sensitive to sulfhydryl group modification as beta-mercaptoethanol increased the extent of steroid binding. Although treatment with iodoacetamide (IA) abolished [3H]R5020 binding, there was a significant (nearly twofold) increase in the [3H]ZK98299 binding. The results of this study point to similarities and differences between the steroid binding properties of the uterine PR occupied by R5020 and ZK98299: both steroids appear to bind the same 8 S receptor but exhibit differential DNA binding and sensitivity to IA. The reported antagonist properties of ZK98299 may, therefore, be explained on the basis of a distinct receptor conformation induced by the antisteroid.     

ZK98299, a novel antiprogesterone that does not interact with chicken oviduct progesterone receptor

Steroid antagonists, at receptor level, are valuable tools for elucidating the mechanism of steroid hormone action. We have examined and compared the interaction of avian and mammalian progesterone receptors with progestins; progesterone and R5020, and a newly synthesized antiprogesterone ZK98299. In the chicken oviduct cytosol, [3H]R5020 binding to macromolecule(s) could be eliminated with prior incubation of cytosol with excess radioinert steroids progesterone or R5020 but not ZK98299. Alternatively, [3H]ZK98299 binding in the chicken oviduct was not abolished in the presence of excess progesterone, R5020, or ZK98299. In the calf uterine cytosol, [3H]R5020 or [3H]ZK98299 binding was competeable with progesterone, R5020 and ZK98299 but not estradiol, DHT or cortisol. Furthermore, immunoprecipitation and protein A-Sepharose adsorption analysis revealed that in the calf uterine cytosol, the [3H]R5020-receptor complexes were recognized by anti-progesterone receptor monoclonal antibody PR6. This antibody, however, did not recognize [3H]ZK98299-receptor complexes. When phosphorylation of progesterone receptor was attempted in the chicken oviduct mince, presence of progesterone resulted in an increased phosphorylation of the known components A (79 kDa) and B (110 kDa) receptor proteins. Presence of ZK98299 neither enhanced the extent of phosphorylation of A and B proteins nor did it reverse the progesterone-dependent increase in the phosphorylation. The avian progesterone receptor, therefore, has unique steroid binding site(s) that exclude(s) interaction with ZK98299. The lack of immunorecognition of calf uterine [3H]ZK98299-receptor complexes, suggests that ZK98299 is either interacting with macromolecule(s) other than the progesterone receptor or with another site on the same protein. Alternatively, the antisteroid binds to the R5020 binding site but the complex adopts a conformation that is not recognized by the PRG antibodies.     

Mechanism of action of an antiprogesterone, RU486, in the rabbit endometrium. Effects of RU486 on the progesterone receptor and on the expression of the uteroglobin gene

RU486 is a recently described antiprogesterone. In order to be able to understand its mechanism of action it is necessary to analyze its effect on a discrete gene product. We show here that the induction of uteroglobin mRNA by progesterone in the rabbit endometrium may be a suitable model for such studies since RU486 totally inhibits this effect without itself exerting any agonistic activity. Moreover, RU486, which does not bind to the estrogen receptor and is devoid of general antiestrogenic activity, partially inhibits the induction by estradiol of uteroglobin mRNA. Studies of the interaction between [3H]RU486 and the progesterone receptor have been undertaken with the aim of understanding the antagonistic effect of this compound. The binding to DNA-cellulose of heat-activated [3H]RU486-receptor complexes was slightly decreased (37%) when compared with that of the agonist [3H]R5020-receptor complexes (47%). Detailed analysis of this difference showed that it was due to both a decreased activation of complexes and to a diminished affinity of activated complexes towards DNA. The change in activation was shown by the fact that at high concentrations of DNA, where all activated complexes are bound, agonist-receptor complexes were bound to DNA in higher proportion than antagonist-receptor complexes. Moreover a difference was also observed when studying the binding of agonist-receptor and antagonist-receptor complexes to charged resins (phosphocellulose, DEAE-cellulose) which are known to discriminate between activated and non-activated complexes. Decreased affinity to DNA of antagonist-receptor complexes was shown by studying their binding at various concentrations of DNA, either in crude cytosol or after isolating a homogenous population of activated-receptor complexes by DNA-cellulose chromatography and by comparing the salt extraction from DNA-cellulose of agonist-receptor and antagonist-receptor complexes. Both effects (decreased activation and diminished affinity towards DNA) were relatively moderate and could account only for a small decrease in the agonistic activity of RU486. Thus, the fact that this compound is a complete antagonist without any agonistic activity can only be explained by a defect in some further step of hormone action as, for instance in the specific interaction with the regulatory regions of the uteroglobin gene. No immunological difference could be detected between [3H]R5020-receptor and [3H]RU486-receptor complexes, both interacted with the five monoclonal antibodies raised against purified R5020-receptor complexes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Studies of a plasma membrane steroid receptor in Xenopus oocytes using the synthetic progestin RU 486

A steroid binding protein (Mr = 110,000) has previously been identified in the plasma membrane of Xenopus laevis oocytes by photoaffinity labeling with [3H]R5020. In order to further characterize this steroid receptor, the photoaffinity labeled receptor protein was solubilized with 0.1% Brij 35. The solubilized labeled receptor yielded an approximate mol. wt of 102,000 +/- 2,000 by sucrose density gradient centrifugation, suggesting that the solubilized receptor exists as a monomer. RU 486, a synthetic progestin antagonist for mammalian cytosolic receptor systems, inhibited up to 70% of [3H] R5020 photoaffinity binding to the 110,000-Dalton receptor with an IC50 of 5 microM and induced germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD) with an EC50 of 9.0 +/- 0.6 microM. GVBD induced by RU 486 was slower than with progesterone, and RU 486 was less powerful than progesterone. Micromolar concentrations of RU 486 also potentiated GVBD induced by sub-optimal concentrations of progesterone or R5020. Furthermore, RU 486 inhibited oocyte plasma membrane adenylate cyclase with an apparent IC50 of 7.5 +/- 2.5 microM. The close correlation of the EC50 value for RU 486 induction of GVBD with the IC50 values for inhibition of [3H]R5020 photoaffinity labeling of the 110,000-Dalton receptor and inhibition of adenylate cyclase activity further supports the physiological significance of the oocyte plasma membrane steroid receptor.     

RU486, a progestin antagonist, binds to progesterone receptors in a human endometrial cancer cell line and reverses the growth inhibition by progestins

The human endometrial cancer cell line, IK-90 cells, contains estrogen-independent progesterone receptors (PR) and is progestin sensitive. Accumulation of glycogen in the cytoplasm of IK-90 cells as well as growth inhibition of the cells in response to progestins are observed. In the present study, the effects of RU486, a progestin antagonist, on IK-90 cells were investigated in a serum-supplemented medium. Scatchard plot analysis of cytoplasmic binding data in the cells revealed a high affinity binding site for RU486 (Kd, 2.6 nM) with maximum binding sites of 169 fmol/mg protein. However, the binding ability to DNA-cellulose of heat activated [3H]RU486-PR complexes was lower when compared with that of the progestin agonist [3H]R5020-PR complexes, suggesting a decrease in progestin activity of RU486 in IK-90 cells. The addition of 1 microM RU486 to culture medium produced periodic acid-Schiff-positive granules in the cytoplasm of the cells. On the other hand, RU486 (1 nM-1 microM) did not significantly inhibit the growth of cells. However, RU486 (0.1-1 microM) totally prevented the growth-inhibitory effect of R5020 (0.1-1 microM) on IK-90 cells. In conclusion, RU486, an antiprogestin, had a dual activity both a progestin antagonist and weak agonist in human endometrial cancer cells, which was not mediated through the estrogen receptor system.     

Evidence for separate binding sites for progesterone and RU486 in the chick oviduct

Binding characteristics of synthetic steroid, mifepristone (RU38486 - also referred to as RU486), were examined in cytosol prepared from the chick oviduct and the calf uterus, and were compared with those of progesterone and synthetic progestin R5020. Unlike [³H]progesterone binding, the [³H]RU486 binding in the oviduct cytosol did not saturate at 50 nM ligand concentration. The [³H]progesterone binding could not be eliminated in the presence of excess RU486, and [³H]RU486 binding was seen to be indisplaceable upon pretreatment of the chick oviduct cytosol with a 1000-fold excess progesterone. It is apparent that the chick oviduct cytosol is endowed with two separate sets of sites which interact with progesterone and RU486 independently. Furthermore, [³H]RU486 binding in the chick oviduct cytosol remained intact when incubated for 60 min at 37°C; it exhibited a single ionic form upon elution from DEAE-Sephacel and the [³H]RU486-associated radioactivity sedimented in the 4 S region both in salt-free and 0.3 M KCl-containing 5–20% sucrose gradients. In the calf uterus cytosol, both steroids exhibited comparable binding profiles. Our results provide evidence that chick oviduct possesses distinct binding sites that accept either progesterone or RU486, but not both, as is the case in the calf uterus.     

Immunologically distinct binding molecules for progesterone and RU38486 in the chick oviduct cytosol

[3H]Progesterone and [3H]RU38486 binding in the chick oviduct cytosol is associated with macromolecules which sediment as 8 S and 4 S moieties, respectively, in molybdate-containing 5-20% sucrose gradients. The [3H]progesterone binding could be displaced by excess progesterone, but not by RU38486. Conversely, the [3H]RU38486 binding was able to compete with RU38486 but not by excess progesterone. A preparation containing antibodies against chick oviduct progesterone receptor recognized only the [3H]progesterone-receptor complex but not the 4 S, [3H]RU38486 binding component of the chick cytosol. In the calf uterus cytosol, [3H]R5020 (a synthetic progestin) and [3H]RU38486 were associated with 8 S molecules and the peaks of radioactivity were displaceable upon preincubation with radionert steroids. In addition, the complexes were recognized by antibodies to chick oviduct progesterone receptor. Our data suggest that in the chick oviduct cytosol, RU38486 does not bind to progesterone receptor, but interacts with an immunologically distinct macromolecule.     

Differences in the binding mechanism of RU486 and progesterone to the progesterone receptor

The binding mechanism of the antagonist RU486 to the progesterone receptor was compared with that of the agonists progesterone and R5020. Both progesterone and RU486 bound to the receptor with a Hill coefficient of 1.2, indicating the binding of each ligand is positive cooperative. However, when each ligand was used to compete with [3H]progesterone for binding to the receptor at receptor concentrations near 8 nM, at which the receptor is likely a dimer, the competition curve for RU486 was significantly steeper than the curves for progesterone and R5020 (p less than 0.001). This indicated that a difference in the binding mechanism of RU486 and progesterone can be detected when both ligands are present. In contrast, at receptor concentrations near 1 nM, at which the receptor is likely a monomer, the competition curves for all three ligands were indistinguishable (p = 0.915). These results indicate that RU486 and agonists have different binding mechanisms for the receptor and further suggest that this difference may be related to site-site interactions within the receptor.     

Agonist and antagonist-induced qualitative and quantitative alterations of progesterone receptor from breast cancer cells

T47D cells, cultured in medium containing serum stripped of endogenous steroids, proliferate in response to treatment with the progesterone receptor (PR) agonist, R5020 or the PR agonist/antagonist, RU486, whereas the full PR antagonist, ZK98299 has no proliferative effects. Under estrogenized conditions, all of the PR ligands tested inhibit cell growth [23]. In order to determine whether the levels or phosphorylation state of PR are reflected in the growth patterns of T47D cells, we monitored the effects of these PR ligands on the immunoblotted PR band intensities, the relative intensities, of PR-A and PR-B, and their phosphorylation states that are reflected in their altered mobility during SDS-PAGE. Under conditions where the PR ligands inhibit cell proliferation, each ligand had distinctively different qualitative and quantitative effects on PR. Short term treatment of the cells with R5020 or RU486 induced a characteristic phosphorylation-dependent upshift of both PR-A and PR-B. The phosphorylated PR was stable for up to 4 days after treatment of the cells with RU486, but was down regulated between 6-24 h after treatment with R5020. No replenishment of PR in cells treated with R5020 was detected. ZK98299, at concentrations tested, had no qualitative or quantitative effects on PR. Culturing cells for 8 days in medium containing steroid-depleted serum caused a significant reduction in the PR band intensity without causing a change in the ratio of PR-A and PR-B or their phosphorylation states. This decrease in the PR band intensity was reversed by maintaining the cells in 1 nM estrogen, but was potentiated by RU486 or ZK98299. These observations support the view that decreased PR levels may play a role in the stimulatory effects of R5020 and RU486 when cells are cultured under non-estrogenized conditions.     

The antiprogesterone RU486 stabilizes the heterooligomeric, non-DNA-binding, 8S-form of the rabbit uterus cytosol progesterone receptor

The salt-induced (0.3 M KCl) transformation of the non-transformed, heterooligomeric 8S-form of the rabbit uterus cytosol progesterone receptor (PR) was analyzed by density gradient ultracentrifugation (8S----4S conversion) and DNA-cellulose chromatography (non-binding----binding forms). After 1 h treatment at 2 C, greater than 90% of agonist (R5020 or Org2058)-PR complexes were transformed, contrary to antagonist (RU486)-PR complexes, which did not undergo any transformation. Thus, there is stabilization of the non-transformed receptor form by RU486 as compared to the effect of agonist binding. The hydrodynamic parameters of both agonist- and antagonist-bound non-transformed receptors were similar and the calculated Mr were approximately 283,000 and approximately 293,000, respectively. In both cases, purification indicated the presence of a 90-kD non-hormone-binding protein associated with the hormone binding unit(s). Transformation of RU486-PR complexes occurred after exposure to high salt at increased temperature and was correlated to the dissociation of the 90-kD protein from the receptor. Both agonist- and antagonist-bound transformed forms of PR had apparent similar affinities for DNA-cellulose. Molybdate-stabilized and KCl-treated RU486-PR complexes were more stable, as assessed by steroid binding, than the corresponding R5020-PR complexes, arguing in favor of a stabilizing effect of both the 90-kD protein and RU486 against inactivation. These cell-free experiments support the concept that RU486 in the rabbit uterus system stabilizes the 8S non-DNA binding, non-transformed form of the receptor at low temperature. The possibility that impaired dissociation of the heterooligomeric receptor form is involved in the antiprogesterone activity of RU486 is discussed.     

Characterization of ligand binding,DNA binding and phosphorylation of progesterone receptor by two novel progesterone receptor antagonist ligands

In order to gain a better understanding of the distinctive mechanisms of the various types of antiprogestins, we have characterized in vitro ligand binding, specific DNA binding and phosphorylation of progesterone receptor (PR) from T47D cells after treatment of cells with progestins (progesterone, R5020) and antiprogestins (RU486, ZK98299, Org 31806 and Org 31710). Treatment of the cells with R5020 or PR antagonists, with the exception of ZK98299, resulted in a quantitative upshift of PR-A and PR-B indicative of ligand/DNA-induced phosphorylation of PR. Treatment of cells with RU486, Org 31710 or Org 31806, but not R5020 or ZK98299 resulted in detectable PR-progesterone response element complexes (PR-PREc) as assessed by gel mobility shift assay. Although treatment of cells with ZK98299, a type I PR antagonist, did not induce phosphorylation, the antiprogestins, Org 31806 and Org 31710, in a manner identical to RU486, did. Our data suggest that Org 31806 and Org 31710 affect propertie s of PR from T47D cells that are similar to RU486. (Mol Cell Biochem 175: 205–212, 1997)     

Comparison of the physical properties of the nuclear progesterone receptor, bound to antiprogestin RU 486 or progestin ORG 2058, following limited proteolysis

The susceptibility of the progesterone receptor, liganded either by the antiprogestin RU 486 or by the progestin ORG 2058, to chymotrypsin and trypsin degradation was investigated. The nuclear fraction was isolated from T47D cells previously exposed either to 0.1 microM [3H]RU 486 or to 0.1 microM [3H]ORG 2058. The proteolytic digestion was performed on the micrococcal nuclease hydrolysate. The molecular weights of the receptor fragments were calculated, in high salt buffer, from the sedimentation coefficients determined on a sucrose gradient and from the Stokes radii estimated by gel filtration on an Agarose A-0.5 m column. Micrococcal nuclease solubilized receptor forms with molecular weights of 80,000 and 75,000 for the antiprogestin- or progestin-liganded receptor, respectively. Chymotrypsin degraded these receptor forms to fragments with molecular weights of 23,000 either for the antiprogestin- or progestin-liganded receptor. Similar molecular weights of 23,000 were calculated for the progesterone receptor liganded either by the antiprogestin RU 436 or the progestin ORG 2058 following trypsin cleavage. We conclude that the degradation pattern of the progesterone receptor liganded either by the antiprogestin RU 486 or the progestin ORG 2058 following chymotrypsin or trypsin digestion seems to be similar.