Initiation factor IF2, thiostrepton and micrococcin prevent the binding of elongation factor G to the Escherichia coli ribosome

The bacterial translational GTPases (initiation factor IF2, elongation factors EF-G and EF-Tu and release factor RF3) are involved in all stages of translation, and evidence indicates that they bind to overlapping sites on the ribosome, whereupon GTP hydrolysis is triggered. We provide evidence for a common ribosomal binding site for EF-G and IF2. IF2 prevents the binding of EF-G to the ribosome, as shown by Western blot analysis and fusidic acid-stabilized EF-G.GDP.ribosome complex formation. Additionally, IF2 inhibits EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis on 70 S ribosomes. The antibiotics thiostrepton and micrococcin, which bind to part of the EF-G binding site and interfere with the function of the factor, also affect the function of IF2. While thiostrepton is a strong inhibitor of EF-G-dependent GTP hydrolysis, GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is stimulated by the drug. Micrococcin stimulates GTP hydrolysis by both factors. We show directly that these drugs act by destabilizing the interaction of EF-G with the ribosome, and provide evidence that they have similar effects on IF2.     

A form of elongation factor G insensitive to N-ethyl-maleimide

Treatment of elongation factor G (EF-G) with the thiol reagent N-ethylmaleimide only partially inhibits (10 to 70%) the activity of the factor in (a) guanosine nucleotide·EF-G·ribosome complex formation, (b) uncoupled ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis, and (c) polypeptide synthesis. Moreover, a similar treatment of the factor with N-[³H]ethylmaleimide does not lead to ³H-label being associated with a GDP·EF-G·ribosome·fusidic acid complex. Thus, the results indicate the presence in EF-G preparations of a form of the factor that does not react with N-ethylmaleimide.     

Release of ribosome-bound ribosome recycling factor by elongation factor G

Elongation factor G (EF-G) and ribosome recycling factor (RRF) disassemble post-termination complexes of ribosome, mRNA, and tRNA. RRF forms stable complexes with 70 S ribosomes and 50 S ribosomal subunits. Here, we show that EF-G releases RRF from 70 S ribosomal and model post-termination complexes but not from 50 S ribosomal subunit complexes. The release of bound RRF by EF-G is stimulated by GTP analogues. The EF-G-dependent release occurs in the presence of fusidic acid and viomycin. However, thiostrepton inhibits the release. RRF was shown to bind to EF-G-ribosome complexes in the presence of GTP with much weaker affinity, suggesting that EF-G may move RRF to this position during the release of RRF. On the other hand, RRF did not bind to EF-G-ribosome complexes with fusidic acid, suggesting that EF-G stabilized by fusidic acid does not represent the natural post-termination complex. In contrast, the complexes of ribosome, EF-G and thiostrepton could bind RRF, although with lower affinity. These results suggest that thiostrepton traps an intermediate complex having RRF on a position that clashes with the P/E site bound tRNA. Mutants of EF-G that are impaired for translocation fail to disassemble post-termination complexes and exhibit lower activity in releasing RRF. We propose that the release of ribosome-bound RRF by EF-G is required for post-termination complex disassembly. Before release from the ribosome, the position of RRF on the ribosome will change from the original A/P site to a new location that clashes with tRNA on the P/E site.     

Domain III of elongation factor G from Thermus thermophilus is essential for induction of GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome

Two elongation factors (EF) EF-Tu and EF-G participate in the elongation phase during protein biosynthesis on the ribosome. Their functional cycles depend on GTP binding and its hydrolysis. The EF-Tu complexed with GTP and aminoacyl-tRNA delivers tRNA to the ribosome, whereas EF-G stimulates translocation, a process in which tRNA and mRNA movements occur in the ribosome. In the present paper we report that: (a) intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is influenced by excision of its domain III; (b) the EF-G lacking domain III has a 10(3)-fold decreased GTPase activity on the ribosome, whereas its affinity for GTP is slightly decreased; and (c) the truncated EF-G does not stimulate translocation despite the physical presence of domain IV, which is also very important for translocation. By contrast, the interactions of the truncated factor with GDP and fusidic acid-dependent binding of EF-G.GDP complex to the ribosome are not influenced. These findings indicate an essential contribution of domain III to activation of GTP hydrolysis. These results also suggest conformational changes of the EF-G molecule in the course of its interaction with the ribosome that might be induced by GTP binding and hydrolysis.     

A central interdomain protein joint in elongation factor G regulates antibiotic sensitivity, GTP hydrolysis, and ribosome translocation

The antibiotic fusidic acid potently inhibits bacterial translation (and cellular growth) by lodging between domains I and III of elongation factor G (EF-G) and preventing release of EF-G from the ribosome. We examined the functions of key amino acid residues near the active site of EF-G that interact with fusidic acid and regulate hydrolysis of GTP. Alanine mutants of these residues spontaneously hydrolyzed GTP in solution, bypassing the normal activating role of the ribosome. A conserved phenylalanine in the switch II element of EF-G was important for suppressing GTP hydrolysis in solution and critical for catalyzing translocation of the ribosome along mRNA. These experimental results reveal the multipurpose roles of an interdomain joint in the heart of an essential translation factor that can both promote and inhibit bacterial translation.     

Carboxyl-terminal amino acid residues in elongation factor G essential for ribosome association and translocation.

The translocation of ribosomes on mRNA is carried out by cellular machinery that has been extremely well conserved across the entire spectrum of living species. This process requires elongation factor G (EF-G, or EF-2 in archaebacteria and eukaryotes), which is a member of the GTPase superfamily. Using genetic techniques, we have identified a series of mutated alleles of fusA (the Escherichia coli gene that encodes EF-G) that were unable to support protein synthesis in vivo. These alleles encode proteins with point mutations at codons 495 (a variant with a Q-to-P change at codon 495 [Q495P]), 502 (G502D), and 563 (G563D) and a nonsense mutation at codon 608. Biochemical analyses demonstrated that EF-G Q495P, G502D, and delta 608-703 were not disrupted in guanine nucleotide binding but were deficient in ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis and guanine nucleotide-dependent ribosome association. We propose that all of these mutations are present in a domain that is essential for ribosome association and that GTP hydrolysis was deficient as a secondary consequence of impaired binding to 70S ribosomes.     

Isolation and characterization of an inhibitor of ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G

Two inhibitors of ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor (EF)G were found in the ribosome wash of Escherichia coli strain B. One of these inhibitors was purified to homogeneity and characterized. The isolated inhibitor was found to consist of two polypeptide subunits with apparent molecular masses of 23 kDa and 10 kDa. Inhibition of EF-G GTPase could not be overcome by increasing amounts of the elongation factor or high concentrations of GTP, but was reversed by large amounts of ribosomes. The effect of the inhibitor was reduced by increasing concentrations of either 30S or 50S ribosomal subunits. EF-G-dependent GTPase of 50S ribosomal subunits was not affected by the inhibitor. These findings clearly show that the inhibitor interferes with the modulation of EF-G GTPase activity by the interactions between 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits. Under conditions, where 30S CsCl core particles are able to associate with 50S subunits and to stimulate EF-G GTPase, the effect of the inhibitor was considerably reduced when intact 30S ribosomal subunits were substituted by 30S CsCl core particles. This finding indicates that 30S CsCl split proteins are important for the action of the inhibitor and that the inhibitor does not affect the EF-G GTPase merely by interfering with the association of ribosomal subunits. Furthermore, poly(U)-dependent poly(phenylalanine) synthesis was considerably less sensitive to the inhibitor than EF-G GTPase. When ribosomes were preincubated with poly(U) and Phe-tRNA(Phe), poly(phenylalanine) synthesis was considerably less affected by the inhibitor, whereas EF-G GTPase was still sensitive.     

Alpha-sarcin cleavage of ribosomal RNA is inhibited by the binding of elongation factor G or thiostrepton to the ribosome.

The translocation reaction catalyzed by elongation factor G (EF-G) is inhibited either by alpha-sarcin cleavage of 23S rRNA or by the binding of thiostrepton to the E. coli ribosome. Here we show that the transitory binding of EF-G and GDP to the ribosome inhibited the rate of alpha-sarcin cleavage and that stabilization of this binding with fusidic acid completely prevented alpha-sarcin cleavage. A similar pattern of inhibition was seen upon the binding of elongation factor 2 to the S. cerevisiae ribosome. The irreversible binding of the antibiotic thiostrepton to the E. coli ribosome, on the other hand, decreased the rate of cleavage by alpha-sarcin approximately 2-fold. These results suggest that the alpha-sarcin site is located within the ribosomal domain for EF-G binding and that the conformation of this site is affected by the binding of thiostrepton.     

Coupling of GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G to translocation and factor recycling on the ribosome

The translocation step of elongation entails the coordinated movement of tRNA and mRNA on the ribosome. Translocation is promoted by elongation factor G (EF-G) and accompanied by GTP hydrolysis, which affects both translocation and turnover of EF-G. Both reactions are much slower (50-100-fold) when GTP is replaced with non-hydrolyzable GTP analogues or GDP, indicating that the reaction rates are determined by conformational transitions induced by GTP hydrolysis. Compared to the rate of uncatalyzed, spontaneous translocation, ribosome binding of EF-G with any guanine nucleotide reduces the free energy of activation by about 18 kJ/mol, whereas GTP hydrolysis contributes another 10 kJ/mol. The acceleration by GTP hydrolysis is due to large decrease in activation enthalpy by about 30 kJ/mol, compared to the reaction with GTP analogues or GDP, whereas the activation entropy becomes unfavorable and is lowered by about 20 kJ/mol (37 degrees C). The data suggest that GTP hydrolysis induces, by a conformational change of EF-G, a rapid conformational rearrangement of the ribosome ("unlocking") which determines the rates of both tRNA-mRNA translocation and recycling of the factor.     

Arginines 29 and 59 of elongation factor G are important for GTP hydrolysis or translocation on the ribosome

GTP hydrolysis by elongation factor G (EF-G) is essential for the translocation step in protein elongation. The low intrinsic GTPase activity of EF-G is strongly stimulated by the ribosome. Here we show that a conserved arginine, R29, of Escherichia coli EF-G is crucial for GTP hydrolysis on the ribosome, but not for GTP binding or ribosome interaction, suggesting that it may be directly involved in catalysis. Another conserved arginine, R59, which is homologous to the catalytic arginine of G(alpha) proteins, is not essential for GTP hydrolysis, but influences ribosome binding and translocation. These results indicate that EF-G is similar to other GTPases in that an arginine residue is required for GTP hydrolysis, although the structural changes leading to GTPase activation are different.     

Interaction of elongation factor 2 from wheat germ with guanosine nucleotides and ribosomes.

1. The amino acid composition of wheat germ EF2 differs to some extent from that of elongation factors from mammals and bacteria. 2. The purified wheat germ EF2, similarly as the factors from other sources, is active in the: EF1-dependent polymerization of phenylalanine; ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis; binding of guanosine nucleotides; and ADP-ribosylation in the presence of diphtheria toxin. Fusidic acid at a concentration of 1 mM inhibits all these EF2-dependent reactions. 3. Diphtheria toxin in the presence of NAD+ inhibits polymerization of phenylalanine but does not effect GTP binding to EF2. 4. Binding of GDP to wheat germ EF2 is inhibited by ribosomes. During interaction with ribosomes, GTP in EF2-GTP complex is rapidly hydrolysed to GDP. Both GTP and 5'-guanylmethylenediphosphonate competitively inhibit formation of the ribosome-EF2-GDP complex due to the replacement of GDP from the complex. The latter is stabilized by fusidic acid.     

Role of domains 4 and 5 in elongation factor G functions on the ribosome

Elongation factor G (EF-G) is a large, five domain GTPase that catalyses the translocation of the tRNAs on the bacterial ribosome at the expense of GTP. In the crystal structure of GDP-bound EF-G, domain 1 (G domain) makes direct contacts with domains 2 and 5, whereas domain 4 protrudes from the body of the molecule. Here, we show that the presence of both domains 4 and 5 is essential for tRNA translocation and for the turnover of the factor on the ribosome, but not for rapid single-round GTP hydrolysis by EF-G. Replacement of a highly conserved histidine residue at the tip of domain 4, His583, with lysine or arginine decreases the rate of tRNA translocation at least 100-fold, whereas the binding of the factor to the ribosome, GTP hydrolysis and P(i) release are not affected by the mutations. Various small deletions in the tip region of domain 4 decrease the translocation activity of EF-G even further, but do not block the turnover of the factor. Unlike native EF-G, the mutants of EF-G lacking domains 4/5 do not interact with the alpha-sarcin stem-loop of 23 S rRNA. These mutants are not released from the ribosome after GTP hydrolysis or translocation, indicating that the contact with, or a conformational change of, the alpha-sarcin stem-loop is required for EF-G release from the ribosome.     

GTPases mechanisms and functions of translation factors on the ribosome

The elongation factors (EF) Tu and G and initiation factor 2 (IF2) from bacteria are multidomain GTPases with essential functions in the elongation and initiation phases of translation. They bind to the same site on the ribosome where their low intrinsic GTPase activities are strongly stimulated. The factors differ fundamentally from each other, and from the majority of GTPases, in the mechanisms of GTPase control, the timing of Pi release, and the functional role of GTP hydrolysis. EF-Tu x GTP forms a ternary complex with aminoacyl-tRNA, which binds to the ribosome. Only when a matching codon is recognized, the GTPase of EF-Tu is stimulated, rapid GTP hydrolysis and Pi release take place, EF-Tu rearranges to the GDP form, and aminoacyl-tRNA is released into the peptidyltransferase center. In contrast, EF-G hydrolyzes GTP immediately upon binding to the ribosome, stimulated by ribosomal protein L7/12. Subsequent translocation is driven by the slow dissociation of Pi, suggesting a mechano-chemical function of EF-G. Accordingly, different conformations of EF-G on the ribosome are revealed by cryo-electron microscopy. GTP hydrolysis by IF2 is triggered upon formation of the 70S initiation complex, and the dissociation of Pi and/or IF2 follows a rearrangement of the ribosome into the elongation-competent state.     

Binding Interaction between Tet(M) and the Ribosome: Requirements for Binding

Tet(M) protein interacts with the protein biosynthesis machinery to render this process resistant to tetracycline by a mechanism which involves release of the antibiotic from the ribosome in a reaction dependent on GTP hydrolysis. To clarify this resistance mechanism further, the interaction of Tet(M) with the ribosome has been examined by using a gel filtration assay with radioactively labelled Tet(M) protein. The presence of GTP and 5′-guanylyl imido diphosphate, but not GDP, promoted Tet(M)-ribosome complex formation. Furthermore, thiostrepton, which inhibits the activities of elongation factor G (EF-G) and EF-Tu by binding to the ribosome, blocks stable Tet(M)-ribosome complex formation. Direct competition experiments show that Tet(M) and EF-G bind to overlapping sites on the ribosome.     

Control of phosphate release from elongation factor G by ribosomal protein L7/12

Ribosomal protein L7/12 is crucial for the function of elongation factor G (EF-G) on the ribosome. Here, we report the localization of a site in the C-terminal domain (CTD) of L7/12 that is critical for the interaction with EF-G. Single conserved surface amino acids were replaced in the CTD of L7/12. Whereas mutations in helices 5 and 6 had no effect, replacements of V66, I69, K70, and R73 in helix 4 increased the Michaelis constant (KM) of EF-G.GTP for the ribosome, suggesting an involvement of these residues in EF-G binding. The mutations did not appreciably affect rapid single-round GTP hydrolysis and had no effect on tRNA translocation on the ribosome. In contrast, the release of inorganic phosphate (Pi) from ribosome-bound EF-G.GDP.Pi was strongly inhibited and became rate-limiting for the turnover of EF-G. The control of Pi release by interactions between EF-G and L7/12 appears to be important for maintaining the conformational coupling between EF-G and the ribosome for translocation and for timing the dissociation of the factor from the ribosome.     

Functional role of the sarcin-ricin loop of the 23S rRNA in the elongation cycle of protein synthesis

The sarcin-ricin loop (SRL) is one of the longest conserved sequences in the 23S ribosomal RNA. The SRL has been accepted as crucial for the activity of the ribosome because it is targeted by cytotoxins such as α-sarcin and ricin that completely abolish translation. Nevertheless, the precise functional role of the SRL in translation is not known. Recent biochemical and structural studies indicate that the SRL is critical for triggering GTP hydrolysis on elongation factor Tu (EF-Tu) and elongation factor G (EF-G). To determine the functional role of the SRL in the elongation stage of protein synthesis, we analyzed mutations in the SRL that are known to abolish protein synthesis and are lethal to cells. Here, we show that the SRL is not critical for GTP hydrolysis on EF-Tu and EF-G. The SRL also is not essential for peptide bond formation. Our results, instead, suggest that the SRL is crucial for anchoring EF-G on the ribosome during mRNA-tRNA translocation.     

The role of ribosome recycling factor in dissociation of 70S ribosomes into subunits

Protein synthesis is initiated on ribosomal subunits. However, it is not known how 70S ribosomes are dissociated into small and large subunits. Here we show that 70S ribosomes, as well as the model post-termination complexes, are dissociated into stable subunits by cooperative action of three translation factors: ribosome recycling factor (RRF), elongation factor G (EF-G), and initiation factor 3 (IF3). The subunit dissociation is stable enough to be detected by conventional sucrose density gradient centrifugation (SDGC). GTP, but not nonhydrolyzable GTP analog, is essential in this process. We found that RRF and EF-G alone transiently dissociate 70S ribosomes. However, the transient dissociation cannot be detected by SDGC. IF3 stabilizes the dissociation by binding to the transiently formed 30S subunits, preventing re-association back to 70S ribosomes. The three-factor-dependent stable dissociation of ribosomes into subunits completes the ribosome cycle and the resulting subunits are ready for the next round of translation.     

Function of sulfhydryl groups in ribosome-elongation factor G reactions. Assignment of guanine nucleotide binding site to elongation factor G.

Titration of elongation factor G (EF-G) with the thiol reagents 5,5'-dithiobis(2-nitrobenzoate) (DNTB), p-hydroxymercuribenzoate (HMB), and N-ethylmaleimide and analysis of cysteic acid after performic acid oxidation revealed a total of four sulfhydryl groups per EF-G molecule. One of these is exposed in the native state and could be used to distinguish between two different conformations of EF-G in our preparations according to its rate of reaction with DTNB and HMB. No evidence for disulfide bridges was obtained. Among the different nucleotides tested, GTP, GDP, and GMP were able to protect the native sulfhydryl group against reaction with DTNB in the absence of ribosomes. Their Kd values with the faster reacting EF-G were 3.4 x 10(-4) M, 0.3 X 10(-4)M, and 2.0 x 10(-4) M, respectively. Because of the specificity of protection by guanine nucleotides and the correspondence of the Kd values with Ki values for GDP and GMP in the ribosome-EF-G GTPase reaction, their binding site on EF-G should be closely related to the active center for ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis. Blockage of the native sulfhydryl group of EF-G with a variety of irreversible thiol reagents reduced its activity from one to two-thirds in ribosome-dependent complex formation, GTP hydrolysis, and poly(U)-directed poly(phenylalanine) synthesis. A test of the N-ethylmaleimide-treated EF-G showed both the Km and Vmax of the GTPase reaction to be affected. Thus, the native sulfhydryl group, although important, appears not to be located in the GTPase active center. Denaturation of EF-G with guanidine-HCl and random blockage of any of the three masked sulfhydryl groups caused inactivation, likely due to steric interference with proper chain folding upon renaturation. Treatment of ribosomes or ribosomal subunits with six different thiol reagents at a concentration of 0.27 mM had little or no effect on the ribosome-EF-G GTPase, except for the case with HMB which inactivated the 30 S subunit. An interaction of EF-G with the 30 S subunit in addition to that known to occur with the 50 S subunit is suggested by a rapid and preferential exchange of HMB from the native sulfhydryl group of EF-G to the 30 S subunit of 70 S ribosomes.     

Interaction of thiostrepton and elongation factor-G with the ribosomal protein L11-binding domain

Ribosomal protein L11 and the L11 binding region of ribosomal RNA constitute an important domain involved in active functions of the ribosome during translation. We studied the effects of L11 knock-out and truncation mutations on the structure of the rRNA in this region and on its interactions with a translation elongation factor and the antibiotic thiostrepton. The results indicated that the structure of the L11-binding rRNA becomes conformationally flexible when ribosomes lack the entire L11 protein, but not when the C-terminal domain is present on ribosomes. Probing wild type and mutant ribosomes in the presence of the antibiotic thiostrepton and elongation factor-G (EF-G) rigorously localized the binding cleft of thiostrepton and suggested a role for the rRNA in the L11-binding domain in modulating factor binding. Our results also provide evidence that the structure of the rRNA stabilized by the C-terminal domain of L11 is necessary to stabilize EF-G binding in the post-translocation state, and thiostrepton may modulate this structure in a manner that interferes with the ribosome-EF-G interaction. The implications for recent models of thiostrepton activity and factor interactions are discussed.     

Mutations in the G-domain of elongation factor G from Thermus thermophilus affect both its interaction with GTP and fusidic acid

Two hypersensitive and two resistant variants of elongation factor-G (EF-G) toward fusidic acid are studied in comparison with the wild type factor. All mutated proteins are active in a cell-free translation system and ribosome-dependent GTP hydrolysis. The EF-G variants with the Thr-84-->Ala or Asp-109-->Lys mutations bring about a strong resistance of EF-G to the antibiotic, whereas the EF-Gs with substitutions Gly-16-->Val or Glu-119-->Lys are the first examples of fusidic acid-hypersensitive factors. A correlation between fusidic acid resistance of EF-G mutants and their affinity to GTP are revealed in this study, although their interactions with GDP are not changed. Thus, fusidic acid-hypersensitive mutants have the high affinity to an uncleavable GTP analog, but the association of resistant mutants with GTP is decreased. The effects of either fusidic acid-sensitive or resistant mutations can be explained by the conformational changes in the EF-G molecule, which influence its GTP-binding center. The results presented in this paper indicate that fusidic acid-sensitive mutant factors have a conformation favorable for GTP binding and subsequent interaction with the ribosomes.