Negative constrained DNA supercoiling in archaeal nucleosomes

Archaeal histones have significant sequence and structural similarity to their eukaryal counterparts. However, whereas DNA is wrapped in negatively constrained supercoils in eukaryal nucleosomes, it has been reported that DNA is positively supercoiled by archaeal nucleosomes. This was inferred from experiments performed at low temperature and low salt concentrations, conditions markedly different from those expected for many archaea in vivo. Here, we report that the archaeal histones HMf and HTz wrap DNA in negatively constrained supercoils in buffers containing potassium glutamate (K-Glu) above 300 mM, either at 37 degrees C or at 70 degrees C. This suggests that high salt concentrations allow an alternate archaeal nucleosome topology: a left-handed tetramer rather than the right-handed tetramer seen in low salt conditions. In contrast, the archaeal histone MkaH produces DNA negative supercoiling at all salt concentrations, suggesting that this duality of structure is not possible for this atypical protein, which is formed by the association of two histone folds in a single polypeptide. These results extend the already remarkable similarity between archaeal and eukaryal nucleosomes, as it has been recently shown that DNA can be wrapped into either positive or negative supercoils around the H3/H4 tetramer. Negative supercoiling could correspond to the predominant physiological mode of DNA supercoiling in archaeal nucleosomes.     

Archaeal histone selection of nucleosome positioning sequences and the procaryotic origin of histone-dependent genome evolution

Archaeal histones and the eucaryal (eucaryotic) nucleosome core histones have almost identical histone folds. Here, we show that DNA molecules selectively incorporated by rHMfB (recombinant archaeal histone B from Methanothermus fervidus) into archaeal nucleosomes from a mixture of approximately 10(14) random sequence molecules contain sequence motifs shown previously to direct eucaryal nucleosome positioning. The dinucleotides GC, AA (=TT) and TA are repeated at approximately 10 bp intervals, with the GC harmonic displaced approximately 5 bp from the AA and TA harmonics [(GCN(3)AA or TA)(n)]. AT and CG were not strongly selected, indicating that TA not equalAT and GC not equalCG in terms of facilitating archaeal nucleosome assembly. The selected molecules have affinities for rHMfB ranging from approximately 9 to 18-fold higher than the level of affinity of the starting population, and direct the positioned assembly of archaeal nucleosomes. Fourier-transform analyses have revealed that AA dinucleotides are much enriched at approximately 10. 1 bp intervals, the helical repeat of DNA wrapped around a nucleosome, in the genomes of Eucarya and the histone-containing Euryarchaeota, but not in the genomes of Bacteria and Crenarchaeota, procaryotes that do not have histones. Facilitating histone packaging of genomic DNA has apparently therefore imposed constraints on genome sequence evolution, and since archaeal histones have no structure in addition to the histone fold, these constraints must result predominantly from histone fold-DNA contacts. Based on the three-domain universal phylogeny, histones and histone-dependent genome sequence evolution most likely evolved after the bacterial-archaeal divergence but before the archaeal-eucaryal divergence, and were subsequently lost in the Crenarchaeota. However, with lateral gene transfer, the first histone fold could alternatively have evolved after the archaeal-eucaryal divergence, early in either the euryarchaeal or eucaryal lineages.     

Histones and nucleosomes in Archaea and Eukarya: a comparative analysis

Archaeal histones from mesophilic, thermophilic, and hyperthermophilic members of the Euryarchaeota have primary sequences, the histone fold, tertiary structures, and dimer formation in common with the eukaryal nucleosome core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. Archaeal histones form nucleoprotein complexes in vitro and in vivo, designated archaeal nucleosomes, that contain histone tetramers and protect approximately 60 base pairs of DNA from nuclease digestion. Based on the sequence and structural homologies and experimental data reviewed here, archaeal nucleosomes appear similar, and may be homologous in evolutionary terms and function, to the structure at the center of the eukaryal nucleosome formed by the histone (H3+H4)₂ tetramer. Received: January 22, 1998 / Accepted: February 16, 1998     

Mutational analysis of archaeal histone-DNA interactions

Site-specific mutagenesis of the hmfB gene cloned from the archaeon Methanothermus fervidus, followed by expression in Escherichia coli, has been used to generate approximately 90 recombinant (r) variants of the archaeal histone HMfB. The abilities of these variants to form stable archaeal nucleosome-containing complexes with linear pBR322 DNA, and with an 89 bp restriction fragment of this DNA have been determined. Variants that failed to form such complexes, based on negative gel-shift assays, had substitutions at the N terminus or within the alpha1, L1 and L2 regions of the rHMfB histone fold, at sites predicted to be homologous to eucaryal histone fold residues that contact the DNA in the eucaryal nucleosome. Variants that failed to give gel shifts were further assayed for their abilities to facilitate ligase-catalyzed circularization of a linear 88 bp DNA molecule, and to reduce the ellipticity of a DNA solution at 275 nm (theta(275)). Consistent with cooperative but independent sites of DNA binding, a combination of three residue substitutions, one each in alpha1, L1 and L2, was required to generate a rHMfB variant with no detectable DNA binding based on gel shift, circularization and theta(275) reduction assays.     

DNA binding and nuclease protection by the HMf histones from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus

The DNA-binding and nuclease-protection properties of the HMf histones from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus have been shown to be consistent with the formation of nucleosome-like structures (NLS). These proteins bind to DNA molecules as short as 20 bp and form complexes that protect DNA fragments from micrococcal nuclease (MNase) digestion that are 30 bp, ∼ 60 bp and multiples of ∼ 60 bp in length. The sequences of 49 of the ∼ 60-bp DNA fragments protected from MNase digestion by HMfA have been determined and their intrinsic curvatures calculated. A circular permutation gel mobility-shift assay was used to determine directly the curvatures for five of these sequences. HMfA bound to intrinsically curved and noncurved DNAs, but exhibited a slight preference for the model curved DNA in binding competitions with a model noncurved DNA. The results obtained are consistent with the concept that the archaeal NLS is analogous, and possibly homologous, to the central core of the eukaryal nucleosome formed by a histone (H3 + H4)2 tetramer. Received: August 11, 1996 / Accepted: November 12, 1996     

Molecular components of the archaeal nucleosome

Here we describe the organization of the archaeal nucleosome, in which four archaeal histones are circumscribed by approximately 80 bp of DNA. Through a combination of sequence comparisons, 3D structural studies, site-directed mutagenesis and assays for DNA binding, we have assigned functions to most of the individual residues in the histone fold of the representative archaeal histone rHMfB. By SELEX selection, the sequences of DNA molecules that are most readily bound and wrapped by rHMfB into archaeal nucleosomes in vitro have been identified, and these define DNA structures that position archaeal nucleosome assembly.     

Crystal structures of recombinant histones HMfA and HMfB from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus

The hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus contains two small basic proteins, HMfA (68 amino acid residues) and HMfB (69 residues) that share a common ancestry with the eukaryal nucleosome core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4. HMfA and HMfB have sequences that differ at 11 locations, they have different structural stabilities, and the complexes that they form with DNA have different electrophoretic mobilities. Here, crystal structures are documented for recombinant (r) HMfA at a resolution of 1.55 A refined to a crystallographic R-value of 19.8 % (tetragonal form) and at 1.48 A refined to a R-value of 18.8 % (orthorhombic form), and for rHMfB at 1.9 A refined to a R-value of 18.0 %. The rHMfA and rHMfB monomers have structures that are just histone folds in which a long central alpha-helix (alpha2; 29 residues) is separated from shorter N-terminal (alpha1; 11 residues) and C-terminal (alpha3; 10 residues) alpha-helices by two loops (L1 and L2; both 6 residues). Within L1 and L2, three adjacent residues are in extended (beta) conformation. rHMfA and rHMfB assemble into homodimers, with the alpha2 helices anti-parallel aligned and crossing at an angle of close to 35 degrees, and with hydrogen bonds formed between the extended, parallel regions of L1 and L2 resulting in short beta-ladders. Dimerization creates a novel N-terminal structure that contains four proline residues, two from each monomer. As prolines are present at these positions in all archaeal histone sequences, this proline-tetrad structure is likely to be a common feature of all archaeal histone dimers. Almost all residues that participate in monomer-monomer interactions are conserved in HMfA and HMfB, consistent with the ability of these monomers to form both homodimers and (HMfA+HMfB) heterodimers. Differences in side-chain interactions that result from non-conservative residue differences in HMfA and HMfB are identified, and the structure of a (rHMfA)(2)-DNA complex is presented based on the structures documented here and modeled by homology to histone-DNA interactions in the eukaryal nucleosome.     

Isolation,characterization, and structure of the folded interphase genome of Drosophila melanogaster

The intact interphase genome of Drosophila melanogaster has been isolated by sucrose gradient centrifugation after gentle lysis of tissue culture cells in 0.9 M NaCl-0.4% Nonidet P40. The nonviscous folded DNA sediments as a single broad 5000S peak in a complex with RNA (a fraction of the nuclear nascent RNA) and protein (all of the four intranucleosome histones: H2A, H2B, H3, and H4).The folded DNA is supercoiled and can be relaxed to slower sedimenting forms either by intercalating ethidium or by nicking with DNAase I. Incomplete DNAase treatment gives partially relaxed complexes, indicating that each nick relaxes only a stretch of DNA (defined as a supercoiled DNA loop) without affecting the superhelical content of the rest of the genome. The concentration of superhelices in the Drosophila folded DNA is the same as in the E. coli and SV40 closed circular DNAs—that is, about one negative turn every 200 base pairs (bp) in 0.15 M NaCl at 26°C. The estimated average size of the supercoiled DNA loops, about 85,000 bp, equals the size of the larger Drosophila chromomeres.Ethidium intercalation in 0.9 M NaCl both removes the negative superhelical turns and dissociates the four histones from the DNA. The four histones are dissociated in equimolar concentrations, and the relative proportion of histones displaced from the DNA is a function of ethidium concentration. The histones are completely dissociated from the folded DNA at the ethidium concentration which removes all of the negative superhelices. Thus the data strongly suggest that the rotation of the Watson Crick helix which accompanies ethidium intercalation causes the loss of nucleosomes from the DNA.The results are interpreted in terms of a model for the folded Drosophila genome which has the DNA constrained (by both protein-DNA and RNA-DNA interactions) into independent supercoiled loops containing on the average 400 nucleosomes per loop. Each nucleosome is composed of a histone core with the DNA wound around it in a 360° left-handed toroidal supercoil; each nucleosome toroidal supercoil plus its relaxed internucleosome DNA contains, on the average, 200 bp.     

Large scale preparation of positively supercoiled DNA using the archaeal histone HMf.

A technique to prepare relatively large quantities (>/=100 microg) of highly positively supercoiled DNA is reported. This uses a recombinant archaeal histone (rHMfB) to introduce toroidal supercoils, and an inexpensive chicken blood extract to relax unrestrained superhelical tension. Preparation of positively supercoiled pUC19 DNA molecules, >50% of which have linking number changes ranging from+8 to+17, is demonstrated. Advantages include the high degree of positive supercoiling that can be achieved, control over the extent of supercoiling, easy production of relatively large quantities of supercoiled DNA, and low cost.     

The archaeal histone-fold protein HMf organizes DNA into bona fide chromatin fibers.

BACKGROUND: The discovery of histone-like proteins in Archaea urged studies into the possible organization of archaeal genomes in chromatin. Despite recent advances, a variety of structural questions remain unanswered. RESULTS: We have used the atomic force microscope (AFM) with traditional nuclease digestion assays to compare the structure of nucleoprotein complexes reconstituted from tandemly repeated eukaryal nucleosome-positioning sequences and histone octamers, H3/H4 tetramers, and the histone-fold archaeal protein HMf. The data unequivocally show that HMf reconstitutes are indeed organized as chromatin fibers, morphologically indistinguishable from their eukaryal counterparts. The nuclease digestion patterns revealed a clear pattern of protection at regular intervals, again similar to the patterns observed with eukaryal chromatin fibers. In addition, we studied HMf reconstitutes on mononucleosome-sized DNA fragments and observed a great degree of similarity in the internal organization of these particles and those organized by H3/H4 tetramers. A difference in stability was observed at the level of mono-, di-, and triparticles between the HMf particles and canonical octamer-containing nucleosomes. CONCLUSIONS: The in vitro reconstituted HMf-nucleoprotein complexes can be considered as bona fide chromatin structures. The differences in stability at the monoparticle level should be due to structural differences between HMf and core histone H3/H4 tetramers, i.e., to the complete absence in HMf of histone tails beyond the histone fold. We speculate that the existence of core histone tails in eukaryotes may provide a greater stability to nucleosomal particles and also provide the additional ability of chromatin structure to regulate DNA function in eukaryotic cells by posttranslational histone tail modifications.     

Differences in the binding of H1 variants to DNA. Cooperativity and linker-length related distribution

A study of the complexes formed between short linear DNA and three H1 variants, a typical somatic H1, and the extreme variants H5, from chicken erythrocytes, and spH1 from sea urchin sperm, has revealed differences between H1, H5 and spH1 that have implications for chromatin structure and folding. 1. All three histones bind cooperatively to DNA in 35 mM NaCl forming similar, but not identical, rod-like complexes. With sufficiently long DNA the complexes may be circular, circles forming more easily with H5 and spH1 than with H1. 2. The binding of H5 and spH1 to DNA is cooperative even in 5 mM NaCl, resulting in well-defined thin filaments that appear to contain two DNA molecules bridged by histone molecules. In contrast, H1 binds distributively over all the DNA molecules in 5 mM NaCl, but forms short stretches similar in appearance to the thin filaments formed with H5 and spH1. Rods appear to arise from the intertwining of regular thin filaments containing cooperatively bound histone molecules on raising the NaCl concentration to 35 mM. 3. The compositions of the rods correspond to one histone molecule for about every 47 bp (H1), 81 bp (H5) and 112 bp (spH1), suggesting average spacings of 24 bp (H1), 41 bp (H5) and 56 bp (spH1) in the component thin (double) filaments. Strikingly, these values are proportional to the linker lengths of the chromatins in which the particular H1 variant is the main or sole H1.     

The presence of RNA in a double helix inhibits its interaction with histone protein

The binding of core histones (H2A, H2B, H3, H4) to a circular plasmid DNA and to a circular DNA-RNA hybrid molecule of similar size has been compared. Circular hybrid molecules were formed from single stranded fd DNA by synthesis of the complimentary strand with ribonucleotides using wheat germ RNA polymerase II. Upon reconstitution of plasmid DNA circles with histone, the sedimentation profiles of the DNA remained sharp by increased several fold in rate. Material from the peak fractions of these sedimentations appeared to be condensed circular loops of nucleosomes when examined by electron microscopy (EM), and the mass ratio of DNA to histone (at the histone concentrations which produced the fastest sedimentations) was typical of native chromatin. In contrast, the sedimentation behavior of DNA-RNA hybrid circles after addition of histone remained unchanged except for a minor fraction which exhibited a broad and faster sedimentation rate. Examination by EM revealed that most of the molecules appeared identical to protein free hybrid circles while the minor, faster sedimenting fraction appeared to be two or more circles bound together by protein aggregates. Finally, a linear molecule consisting of about 3000 base pairs of duplex DNA covalently joined on both ends to 1500 base pairs of RNA-DNA hybrid helix was constructed. Reconstitution of this molecule with core histone showed nucleosome formation only on the central DNA duplex region. Isopycnic banding of fixed hybrid-histone mixtures showed that little or no histone had bound to the bulk of the full hybrid molecules. We suggest that the presence of RNA in a nucleic acid duplex inhibits the condensation of the duplex into a nucleosomal structure by histone.     

Effect of salt on the binding of the linker histone H1 to DNA and nucleosomes

The linker histones are involved in the salt-dependent folding of the nucleosomes into higher-order chromatin structures. To better understand the mechanism of action of these histones in chromatin, we studied the interactions of the linker histone H1 with DNA at various histone/DNA ratios and at different ionic strengths. In direct competition experiments, we have confirmed the binding of H1 to superhelical DNA in preference to linear or nicked circular DNA forms. We show that the electrophoretic mobility of the H1/supercoiled DNA complex decreases with increasing H1 concentrations and increases with ionic strengths. These results indicate that the interaction of the linker histone H1 with supercoiled DNA results in a soluble binding of H1 with DNA at low H1 or salt concentrations and aggregation at higher H1 concentrations. Moreover, we show that H1 dissociates from the DNA or nucleosomes at high salt concentrations. By the immobilized template pull-down assay, we confirm these data using the physiologically relevant nucleosome array template.     

Rat liver HMG1: a physiological nucleosome assembly factor.

Incubation of rat liver single-stranded DNA-binding protein HMG1 with the four core histones at 0.15 M NaCl favors histone association primarily into tetramers and, to a lesser extent, into octamers. The assembly of pre-formed histone-HMG1 complexes with DNA yields nucleosome-like subunits which satisfy most of the criteria defining native core particles: (i) the circular DNA extracted from the complexes is supercoiled indicating that the initially relaxed DNA acquired superhelical turns during complex formation in the presence of topoisomerase I; (ii) the digestion of the complexes with micrococcal nuclease yields a DNA fragment of approximately 140 bp in length; (iii) electron microscopy of the reconstituted complexes shows a beaded structure with the DNA wrapped around the histone cores, leading to a reduction in the contour length of the genome compared with free DNA. Moreover, in the presence of HMG1, nucleosome assembly occurs rapidly at 0.15 M NaCl. Therefore, in addition to its DNA-binding properties, HMG1 mediates the assembly of nucleosomes in vitro under conditions of physiological ionic strength. The possible involvement of these properties in the DNA replication process is discussed.     

Both DNA and histone fold sequences contribute to archaeal nucleosome stability.

The roles and interdependence of DNA sequence and archaeal histone fold structure in determining archaeal nucleosome stability and positioning have been determined and quantitated. The presence of four tandem copies of TTTAAAGCCG in the polylinker region of pLITMUS28 resulted in a DNA molecule with increased affinity (DeltaDeltaG of approximately 700 cal mol(-1)) for the archaeal histone HMfB relative to the polylinker sequence, and the dominant, quantitative contribution of the helical repeats of the dinucleotide TA to this increased affinity has been established. The rotational and translational positioning of archaeal nucleosomes assembled on the (TTTAAAGCCG)(4) sequence and on DNA molecules selectively incorporated into archaeal nucleosomes by HMfB have been determined. Alternating A/T- and G/C-rich regions were located where the minor and major grooves, respectively, sequentially faced the archaeal nucleosome core, and identical positioning results were obtained using HMfA, a closely related archaeal histone also from Methanothermus fervidus. However, HMfA did not have similarly high affinities for the HMfB-selected DNA molecules, and domain-swap experiments have shown that this difference in affinity is determined by residue differences in the C-terminal region of alpha-helix 3 of the histone fold, a region that is not expected to directly interact with DNA. Rather this region is thought to participate in forming the histone dimer:dimer interface at the center of an archaeal nucleosome histone tetramer core. If differences in this interface do result in archaeal histone cores with different sequence preferences, then the assembly of alternative archaeal nucleosome tetramer cores could provide an unanticipated and novel structural mechanism to regulate gene expression.     

ATP dependent histone phosphorylation and nucleosome assembly in a human cell free extract.

Physiologically spaced nucleosome formation in HeLa cell extracts is ATP dependent. ATP hydrolysis is required for chromatin assembly on both linear and covalently closed circular DNA. The link between the phosphorylation state of histones and nucleosome formation has been examined and we demonstrate that in the absence of histone phosphorylation no stable and regularly spaced nucleosomes are formed. Phosphorylated H3 stabilizes the nucleosome core; while phosphorylation of histone H2a is necessary to increase the linker length between nucleosomes from 0 to approximately 45 bp. Histone H1 alone, whether phosphorylated or unphosphorylated, does not increase the nucleosome repeat length in the absence of core histone phosphorylation. Phosphorylations of H1 and H3 correlate with condensation of chromatin. Maximum ATP hydrolysis which is necessary to increase the periodicity of nucleosomes from approximately 150 to approximately 185 bp, not only inhibits H1 and H3 phosphorylation but facilitates their dephosphorylation.