Robust and sensitive iTRAQ quantification on an LTQ Orbitrap mass spectrometer

Isobaric stable isotope tagging reagents such as tandem mass tags or isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification enable multiplexed quantification of peptides via reporter ion signals in the low mass range of tandem mass spectra. Until recently, the poor recovery of low mass fragments observed in tandem mass spectra acquired on ion trap mass spectrometers precluded the use of these reagents on this widely available instrument platform. The Pulsed Q Dissociation (PQD) technique allows negotiating this limitation but suffers from poor fragmentation efficiency, which has raised doubts in the community as to its practical utility. Here we show that by carefully optimizing instrument parameters such as collision energy, activation Q, delay time, ion isolation width, number of microscans, and number of trapped ions, low m/z fragment ion intensities can be generated that enable accurate peptide quantification at the 100 amol level. Side by side comparison of PQD on an LTQ Orbitrap with CID on a five-year old Q-Tof Ultima using complex protein digests shows that whereas precision of quantification of 10-15% can be achieved by both approaches, PQD quantifies twice as many proteins. PQD on an LTQ Orbitrap also outperforms "higher energy collision induced dissociation" on the same instrument using the recently introduced octapole collision cell in terms of lower limit of quantification. Finally, we demonstrate the significant analytical potential of iTRAQ quantification using PQD on an LTQ Orbitrap by quantitatively measuring the kinase interaction profile of the small molecule drug imatinib in K-562 cells. This article gives practical guidance for the implementation of PQD, discusses its merits, and for the first time, compares its performance to higher energy collision-induced dissociation.     

Simultaneous analysis of relative protein expression levels across multiple samples using iTRAQ isobaric tags with 2D nano LC-MS/MS

In this paper, we describe the use of iTRAQ (isobaric Tags for Relative and Absolute Quantitation) tags for comparison of protein expression levels between multiple samples. These tags label all peptides in a protein digest before labeled samples are pooled, fractionated and analyzed using mass spectrometry (MS). As the tags are isobaric, the intensity of each peak is the sum of the intensity of this peptide from all samples, providing a moderate enhancement in sensitivity. On peptide fragmentation, amino-acid sequence ions also show this summed intensity, providing a sensitivity enhancement. However, the distinct distribution of isotopes in the tags is such that, on further fragmentation, a tag-specific reporter ion is released. The relative intensities of these ions represent the relative amount of peptide in the analytes. Integration of the relative quantification data for the peptides allows relative quantification of the protein. This protocol discusses the rationale behind design, optimization and performance of experiments, comparing protein samples using iTRAQ chemistries combined with strong cation exchange chromatographic fractionation and MS.     

Higher-energy collision-activated dissociation without a dedicated collision cell

Beam-type collisional activation dissociation (HCD) offers many advantages over resonant excitation collision-activated dissociation, including improved identification of phosphorylated peptides and compatibility with isobaric tag-based quantitation (e.g. tandem mass tag (TMT) and iTRAQ). However, HCD typically requires specially designed and dedicated collision cells. Here we demonstrate that HCD can be performed in the ion injection pathway of a mass spectrometer with a standard atmospheric inlet (iHCD). Testing this method on complex peptide mixtures revealed similar identification rates to collision-activated dissociation (2883 versus 2730 IDs for iHCD/CAD, respectively) and precursor-product-conversion efficiency comparable to that achieved within a dedicated collision cell. Compared with pulsed-q dissociation, a quadrupole ion trap-based method that retains low-mass isobaric tag reporter ions, iHCD yielded isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification reporter ions 10-fold more intense. This method involves no additional hardware and can theoretically be implemented on any mass spectrometer with an atmospheric inlet.     

Tissue-based absolute quantification using large-scale TMT and LFQ experiments

Relative and absolute intensity-based protein quantification across cell lines, tissue atlases and tumour datasets is increasingly available in public datasets. These atlases enable researchers to explore fundamental biological questions, such as protein existence, expression location, quantity and correlation with RNA expression. Most studies provide MS1 feature-based label-free quantitative (LFQ) datasets; however, growing numbers of isobaric tandem mass tags (TMT) datasets remain unexplored. Here, we compare traditional intensity-based absolute quantification (iBAQ) proteome abundance ranking to an analogous method using reporter ion proteome abundance ranking with data from an experiment where LFQ and TMT were measured on the same samples. This new TMT method substitutes reporter ion intensities for MS1 feature intensities in the iBAQ framework. Additionally, we compared LFQ-iBAQ values to TMT-iBAQ values from two independent large-scale tissue atlas datasets (one LFQ and one TMT) using robust bottom-up proteomic identification, normalisation and quantitation workflows.     

IsobariQ: software for isobaric quantitative proteomics using IPTL, iTRAQ, and TMT

Isobaric peptide labeling plays an important role in relative quantitative comparisons of proteomes. Isobaric labeling techniques utilize MS/MS spectra for relative quantification, which can be either based on the relative intensities of reporter ions in the low mass region (iTRAQ and TMT) or on the relative intensities of quantification signatures throughout the spectrum due to isobaric peptide termini labeling (IPTL). Due to the increased quantitative information found in MS/MS fragment spectra generated by the recently developed IPTL approach, new software was required to extract the quantitative information. IsobariQ was specifically developed for this purpose; however, support for the reporter ion techniques iTRAQ and TMT is also included. In addition, to address recently emphasized issues about heterogeneity of variance in proteomics data sets, IsobariQ employs the statistical software package R and variance stabilizing normalization (VSN) algorithms available therein. Finally, the functionality of IsobariQ is validated with data sets of experiments using 6-plex TMT and IPTL. Notably, protein substrates resulting from cleavage by proteases can be identified as shown for caspase targets in apoptosis.     

Protein labeling by iTRAQ: a new tool for quantitative mass spectrometry in proteome research

A novel, MS-based approach for the relative quantification of proteins, relying on the derivatization of primary amino groups in intact proteins using isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) is presented. Due to the isobaric mass design of the iTRAQ reagents, differentially labeled proteins do not differ in mass; accordingly, their corresponding proteolytic peptides appear as single peaks in MS scans. Because quantitative information is provided by isotope-encoded reporter ions that can only be observed in MS/MS spectra, we analyzed the fragmentation behavior of ESI and MALDI ions of peptides generated from iTRAQ-labeled proteins using a TOF/TOF and/or a QTOF instrument. We observed efficient liberation of reporter ions for singly protonated peptides at low-energy collision conditions. In contrast, increased collision energies were required to liberate the iTRAQ label from lysine side chains of doubly charged peptides and, thus, to observe reporter ions suitable for relative quantification of proteins with high accuracy. We then developed a quantitative strategy that comprises labeling of intact proteins by iTRAQ followed by gel electrophoresis and peptide MS/MS analyses. As proof of principle, mixtures of five different proteins in various concentration ratios were quantified, demonstrating the general applicability of the approach presented here to quantitative MS-based proteomics.     

Global combined precursor isotopic labeling and isobaric tagging (cPILOT) approach with selective MS3 acquisition

Recently, we reported a novel proteomics quantitation scheme termed “combined precursor isotopic labeling and isobaric tagging (cPILOT)” that allows for the identification and quantitation of nitrated peptides in as many as 12–16 samples in a single experiment. cPILOT offers enhanced multiplexing and posttranslational modification specificity, however excludes global quantitation for all peptides present in a mixture and underestimates reporter ion ratios similar to other isobaric tagging methods due to precursor co‐isolation. Here, we present a novel chemical workflow for cPILOT that can be used for global tagging of all peptides in a mixture. Specifically, through low pH precursor dimethylation of tryptic or LysC peptides followed by high pH tandem mass tags, the same reporter ion can be used twice in a single experiment. Also, to improve triple‐stage mass spectrometry (MS³) data acquisition, a selective MS³ method that focuses on product selection of the y₁ fragment of lysine‐terminated peptides is incorporated into the workflow. This novel cPILOT workflow has potential for global peptide quantitation that could lead to enhanced sample multiplexing and increase the number of quantifiable spectra obtained from MS³ acquisition methods.     

ITMSQ: A software tool for N‐ and C‐terminal fragment ion pairs based isobaric tandem mass spectrometry quantification

Tandem MS (MS2) quantification using the series of N‐ and C‐terminal fragment ion pairs generated from isobaric‐labelled peptides was recently considered an accurate strategy in quantitative proteomics. However, the presence of multiplexed terminal fragment ion in MS2 spectra may reduce the efficiency of peptide identification, resulting in lower identification scores or even incorrect assignments. To address this issue, we developed a quantitative software tool, denoted isobaric tandem MS quantification (ITMSQ), to improve N‐ and C‐terminal fragment ion pairs based isobaric MS2 quantification. A spectrum splitting module was designed to separate the MS2 spectra from different samples, increasing the accuracy of both identification and quantification. ITMSQ offers a convenient interface through which parameters can be changed along with the labelling method, and the result files and all of the intermediate files can be exported. We performed an analysis of in vivo terminal amino acid labelling labelled HeLa samples and found that the numbers of quantified proteins and peptides increased by 13.64 and 27.52% after spectrum splitting, respectively. In conclusion, ITMSQ provides an accurate and reliable quantitative solutionfor N‐ and C‐terminal fragment ion pairs based isobaric MS2 quantitative methods.     

Preprocessing Significantly Improves the Peptide/Protein Identification Sensitivity of High-resolution Isobarically Labeled Tandem Mass Spectrometry Data

Isobaric labeling techniques coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry have been widely employed in proteomic workflows requiring relative quantification. For each high-resolution tandem mass spectrum (MS/MS), isobaric labeling techniques can be used not only to quantify the peptide from different samples by reporter ions, but also to identify the peptide it is derived from. Because the ions related to isobaric labeling may act as noise in database searching, the MS/MS spectrum should be preprocessed before peptide or protein identification. In this article, we demonstrate that there are a lot of high-frequency, high-abundance isobaric related ions in the MS/MS spectrum, and removing isobaric related ions combined with deisotoping and deconvolution in MS/MS preprocessing procedures significantly improves the peptide/protein identification sensitivity. The user-friendly software package TurboRaw2MGF (v2.0) has been implemented for converting raw TIC data files to mascot generic format files and can be downloaded for free from https://github.com/shengqh/RCPA.Tools/releases as part of the software suite ProteomicsTools. The data have been deposited to the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD000994.Mass spectrometry-based proteomics has been widely applied to investigate protein mixtures derived from tissue, cell lysates, or from body fluids (1, 2). Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)¹ is the most popular strategy for protein/peptide mixtures analysis in shotgun proteomics (3). Large-scale protein/peptide mixtures are separated by liquid chromatography followed by online detection by tandem mass spectrometry. The capabilities of proteomics rely greatly on the performance of the mass spectrometer. With the improvement of MS technology, proteomics has benefited significantly from the high-resolution and excellent mass accuracy (4). In recent years, based on the higher efficiency of higher energy collision dissociation (HCD), a new “high–high” strategy (high-resolution MS as well as MS/MS(tandem MS)) has been applied instead of the “high–low” strategy (high-resolution MS, i.e. in Orbitrap, and low-resolution MS/MS, i.e. in ion trap) to obtain high quality tandem MS/MS data as well as full MS in shotgun proteomics. Both full MS scans and MS/MS scans can be performed, and the whole cycle time of MS detection is very compatible with the chromatographic time scale (5).High-resolution measurement is one of the most important features in mass spectrometric application. In this high–high strategy, high-resolution and accurate spectra will be achieved in tandem MS/MS scans as well as full MS scans, which makes isotopic peaks distinguishable from one another, thus enabling the easy calculation of precise charge states and monoisotopic mass. During an LC-MS/MS experiment, a multiply charged precursor ion (peptide) is usually isolated and fragmented, and then the multiple charge states of the fragment ions are generated and collected. After full extraction of peak lists from original tandem mass spectra, the commonly used search engines (i.e. Mascot (6), Sequest (7)) have no capability to distinguish isotopic peaks and recognize charge states, so all of the product ions are considered as all charge state hypotheses during the database search for protein identification. These multiple charge states of fragment ions and their isotopic cluster peaks can be incorrectly assigned by the search engine, which can cause false peptide identification. To overcome this issue, data preprocessing of the high-resolution MS/MS spectra is required before submitting them for identification. There are usually two major preprocessing steps used for high-resolution MS/MS data: deisotoping and deconvolution (8, 9). Deisotoping of spectra removes all isotopic peaks except monoisotopic peaks from multi-isotopic peaks. Deconvolution of spectra translates multiply charged ions to singly charged ions and also accumulates the intensity of fragment ions by summing up all the intensities from their multiply charged states. After performing these two data-preprocessing steps, the resulting spectra is simpler and cleaner and allows more precise database searching and accurate bioinformatics analysis.With the capacity to analyze multiple samples simultaneously, stable isotope labeling approaches have been widely used in quantitative proteomics. Stable isotope labeling approaches are categorized as metabolic labeling (SILAC, stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture) and chemical labeling (10, 11). The peptides labeled by the SILAC approach are quantified by precursor ions in full MS spectra, whereas peptides that have been isobarically labeled using chemical means are quantified by reporter ions in MS/MS spectra. There are two similar isobaric chemical labeling methods: (1) isobaric tag for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ), and (2) tandem mass tag (TMT) (12, 13). These reagents contain an amino-reactive group that specifically reacts with N-terminal amino groups and epilson-amino groups of lysine residues to label digested peptides in a typical shotgun proteomics experiment. There are four different channels of isobaric tags: TMT two-plex, iTRAQ four-plex, TMT six-plex, and iTRAQ eight-plex (12–16). The number before “plex” denotes the number of samples that can be analyzed by the mass spectrum simultaneously. Peptides labeled with different isotopic variants of the tag show identical or similar mass and appear as a single peak in full scans. This single peak may be selected for subsequent MS/MS analysis. In an MS/MS scan, the mass of reporter ions (114 to 117 for iTRAQ four-plex, 113 to 121 for iTRAQ eight-plex, and 126 to 131for TMT six-plex upon CID or HCD activation) are associated with corresponding samples, and the intensities represent the relative abundances of the labeled peptides. Meanwhile, the other ions from the MS/MS spectra can be used for peptide identification. Because of the multiplexing capability, isobaric labeling methods combined with bottom-up proteomics have been widely applied for accurate quantification of proteins on a global scale (14, 17–19). Although mostly associated with peptide labeling, these isobaric labeling methods have also been applied at protein level (20–23).For the proteomic analysis of isobarically labeled peptides/proteins in “high–high” MS strategy, the common consensus is that accurate reporter ions can contribute to more accurate quantification. However, there is no evidence to show how the ions related to isobaric labeling affect the peptide/protein identification and what preprocessing steps should be taken for high-resolution isobarically labeled MS/MS. To demonstrate the effectiveness and importance of preprocessing, we examined how the combination of preprocessing steps improved peptide/protein sensitivity in database searching. Several combinatorial ways of data-preprocessing were applied for high-throughput data analysis including deisotoping to keep simple monoisotopic mass peaks, deconvolution of ions with multiple charge states, and preservation of top 10 peaks in every 100 Dalton mass range. After systematic analysis of high-resolution isobarically labeled spectra, we further processed the spectra and removed interferential ions that were not related to the peptide. Our results suggested that the preprocessing of isobarically labeled high-resolution tandem mass spectra significantly improved the peptide/protein identification sensitivity.     

IQuant: An automated pipeline for quantitative proteomics based upon isobaric tags

Quantitative proteomics technology based on isobaric tags is playing an important role in proteomic investigation. In this paper, we present an automated software, named IQuant, which integrates a postprocessing tool of protein identification and advanced statistical algorithms to process the MS/MS signals generated from the peptides labeled by isobaric tags and aims at proteomics quantification. The software of IQuant, which is freely downloaded at http://sourceforge.net/projects/iquant/ , can run from a graphical user interface and a command‐line interface, and can work on both Windows and Linux systems.     

Relative protein quantification by isobaric SILAC with immonium ion splitting (ISIS)

Metabolic labeling techniques have recently become popular tools for the quantitative profiling of proteomes. Classical stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell cultures (SILAC) uses pairs of heavy/light isotopic forms of amino acids to introduce predictable mass differences in protein samples to be compared. After proteolysis, pairs of cognate precursor peptides can be correlated, and their intensities can be used for mass spectrometry-based relative protein quantification. We present an alternative SILAC approach by which two cell cultures are grown in media containing isobaric forms of amino acids, labeled either with 13C on the carbonyl (C-1) carbon or 15N on backbone nitrogen. Labeled peptides from both samples have the same nominal mass and nearly identical MS/MS spectra but generate upon fragmentation distinct immonium ions separated by 1 amu. When labeled protein samples are mixed, the intensities of these immonium ions can be used for the relative quantification of the parent proteins. We validated the labeling of cellular proteins with valine, isoleucine, and leucine with coverage of 97% of all tryptic peptides. We improved the sensitivity for the detection of the quantification ions on a pulsing instrument by using a specific fast scan event. The analysis of a protein mixture with a known heavy/light ratio showed reliable quantification. Finally the application of the technique to the analysis of two melanoma cell lines yielded quantitative data consistent with those obtained by a classical two-dimensional DIGE analysis of the same samples. Our method combines the features of the SILAC technique with the advantages of isobaric labeling schemes like iTRAQ. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of isobaric SILAC with immonium ion splitting as well as possible ways to improve it.     

Structural studies of gangliosides by fast atom bombardment ionization, low-energy collision-activated dissociation, and tandem mass spectrometry

Negative ion fast atom bombardment, low-energy collision-activated dissociation, and tandem mass spectrometry techniques were applied for the structural elucidation of gangliosides. The mass spectra were simplified by selecting a single molecular ion or fragment ion in the analysis of mixtures, and interference by background signals from the liquid matrix could be avoided. Introduction of collision-activated dissociation produced abundant fragment ions convenient for structural analysis. In the daughter scan mode, ions were produced by cleavage of the glycosidic bonds, and not by cleavage at the sugar ring. These ions all contain ceramide moieties, except the sialic acid fragment ion. In the parent scan mode, product ions resulting from cleavage at the sugar ring were detected beside the ions resulting from cleavage at the glycosidic bonds, and ions of oligosaccharide fragments were also detected. In parent scan mode spectra of gangliosides based on the sialic acid ion, all ions contained a sialic acid residue, and the observed ions were similar to those obtained in the high-energy collision-activated dissociation daughter scan mode. These results indicate the usefulness of low-energy collision-activated dissociation tandem mass spectrometry in the daughter and parent scan modes for the analysis of ganglioside structure, in combination with fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry and high-energy collision-activated dissociation mass spectrometry.     

Differential Proteomic Analysis of Acute Contusive Spinal Cord Injury in Rats Using iTRAQ Reagent Labeling and LC–MS/MS

In this experimental study, differential labeling with isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ) reagents followed by liquid chromatography (LC) and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) proteomic approach was used to investigate differences in the proteome of rat spinal cord at 24 h following a moderate contusion injury. Spinal cord protein samples from the injury epicenter (or from sham controls) were trypsinized and differentially labeled with iTRAQ isotopic reagents. The differentially labeled samples were then combined into one sample mixture, separated by LC, and analyzed using MS/MS. Proteins were quantified by comparing the peak areas of iTRAQ reporter fragment ions in MS/MS spectra. The outcome of this analysis revealed that proteins involved in ubiquitination, endocytosis and exocytosis, energy metabolism, inflammatory response, oxidative stress, cytoskeletal disruption, and vascular damage were significantly altered at 24 h following spinal cord injury (SCI). This study demonstrates the utility of the iTRAQ method in proteomic studies and provides further insights into secondary events that occur during acute times following SCI.     

iTRAQ labeling is superior to mTRAQ for quantitative global proteomics and phosphoproteomics

Labeling of primary amines on peptides with reagents containing stable isotopes is a commonly used technique in quantitative mass spectrometry. Isobaric labeling techniques such as iTRAQ™ or TMT™ allow for relative quantification of peptides based on ratios of reporter ions in the low m/z region of spectra produced by precursor ion fragmentation. In contrast, nonisobaric labeling with mTRAQ™ yields precursors with different masses that can be directly quantified in MS1 spectra. In this study, we compare iTRAQ- and mTRAQ-based quantification of peptides and phosphopeptides derived from EGF-stimulated HeLa cells. Both labels have identical chemical structures, therefore precursor ion- and fragment ion-based quantification can be directly compared. Our results indicate that iTRAQ labeling has an additive effect on precursor intensities, whereas mTRAQ labeling leads to more redundant MS2 scanning events caused by triggering on the same peptide with different mTRAQ labels. We found that iTRAQ labeling quantified nearly threefold more phosphopeptides (12,129 versus 4,448) and nearly twofold more proteins (2,699 versus 1,597) than mTRAQ labeling. Although most key proteins in the EGFR signaling network were quantified with both techniques, iTRAQ labeling allowed quantification of twice as many kinases. Accuracy of reporter ion quantification by iTRAQ is adversely affected by peptides that are cofragmented in the same precursor isolation window, dampening observed ratios toward unity. However, because of tighter overall iTRAQ ratio distributions, the percentage of statistically significantly regulated phosphopeptides and proteins detected by iTRAQ and mTRAQ was similar. We observed a linear correlation of logarithmic iTRAQ to mTRAQ ratios over two orders of magnitude, indicating a possibility to correct iTRAQ ratios by an average compression factor. Spike-in experiments using peptides of defined ratios in a background of nonregulated peptides show that iTRAQ quantification is less accurate but not as variable as mTRAQ quantification.Stable isotope labeling techniques have become very popular in recent years to perform quantitative mass spectrometry experiments with high precision and accuracy. In contrast to label-free approaches, multiplexed isotopically labeled samples can be simultaneously analyzed resulting in increased reproducibility and accuracy for quantification of peptides and proteins from different biological states. Isotopic labeling strategies can be grouped into two major categories: isobaric labels and nonisobaric labels. In the former category are iTRAQ¹ (isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (1)) and TMT (tandem mass tags (2)) mass tags. In the nonisobaric labeling category are methods such as mTRAQ (mass differential tags for relative and absolute quantification), stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture (SILAC (3)), and reductive dimethylation (4). Isobaric labeling techniques allow relative quantification of peptides based on ratios of low m/z reporter ions produced by fragmentation of the precursor ion, whereas nonisobaric labeling yields precursors with different masses that can be directly quantified from MS1 intensity. iTRAQ and mTRAQ reagents provide a great opportunity to directly compare capabilities of reporter and precursor ion quantification since both labels have identical chemical structures and differ only in their composition and number of ¹³C, ¹⁵N, and ¹⁸O atoms. In fact, iTRAQ-117 and mTRAQ-Δ4 are identical mass tags with a total mass of 145 Da (Fig. 1A). To achieve 4-plex quantification capabilities for iTRAQ labels, the composition of stable isotopes is arranged in a way to obtain the reporter ion/balancing group pairs 114/31, 115/30, 116/29, and 117/28 (1). Three nonisobaric mTRAQ labels were generated by adding or removing four neutrons to the mTRAQ-Δ4 label resulting in mTRAQ-Δ8 and mTRAQ-Δ0, respectively. Both iTRAQ and mTRAQ reagents are available as N-hydroxy-succinimide esters to facilitate primary amine labeling of peptides.Open in a separate windowFig. 1.A, Labeling strategy for comparative evaluation of iTRAQ and mTRAQ tags. Peptides were labeled with the indicated iTRAQ and mTRAQ reagents for combined phosphoproteome and proteome analysis. B, Selection of optimal instrument methods for analysis of iTRAQ- and mTRAQ-labeled peptides. Unfractionated proteome samples (1 ug) and phosphoproteome samples (enriched from 250 μg peptides) were analyzed for iTRAQ samples with a CID/HCD-Top8 method, whereas for mTRAQ we compared CID-Top16 acquisition to HCD-Top8. Note that duty cycle times were for all instrument methods ∼3.1 s.One potential advantage of an iTRAQ labeling strategy is its additive effect on precursor intensities when samples are multiplexed, resulting in increased sensitivity. However, iTRAQ ratios have been demonstrated to be prone to compression. This occurs when other nonregulated background peptides are co-isolated and cofragmented in the same isolation window of the peptide of interest and contribute fractional intensity to the reporter ions in MS2-scans (5–7). Because most peptides in an experiment are present at 1:1:1:1 ratios between multiplexed samples, all ratios in the experiment tend to be dampened toward unity when cofragmentation occurs. This inaccuracy led to the development of mTRAQ labels to facilitate accurate precursor-based quantification of proteins initially identified in iTRAQ discovery experiments with targeted assays, such as multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) (8). Although iTRAQ has been widely used in discovery-based proteomics studies, mTRAQ has only appeared in a small number of studies thus far (8).In this study we investigated the advantages and disadvantages of iTRAQ and mTRAQ labeling for proteome-wide analysis of protein phosphorylation and expression changes. We selected epidermal growth factor (EGF)-stimulated HeLa cells as a model system for our comparative evaluation of iTRAQ and mTRAQ labeling, as both changes in the phosphoproteome (9) as well as the proteome (10) are well described for EGF stimulation. We show that iTRAQ labeling yields superior results to mTRAQ in terms of numbers of quantified phosphopeptides, proteins and regulated components. By means of spike-in experiments with GluC generated peptides of known ratios we find that iTRAQ quantification is more precise but less accurate than mTRAQ due to ratio compression. We identify a linear relationship of observed versus expected logarithmic GluC generated peptide ratios as well as for logarithmic iTRAQ and mTRAQ ratios of the phosphoproteome and proteome analysis. This indicates a uniform degree of ratio compression over two orders of magnitude throughout iTRAQ data sets and explains why iTRAQ ratio compression does not compromise the ability to detect regulated elements in these experiments.     

Combining low- and high-energy tandem mass spectra for optimized peptide quantification with isobaric tags

Isobaric tagging, via TMT or iTRAQ, is widely used in quantitative proteomics. To date, tandem mass spectrometric analysis of isobarically-labeled peptides with hybrid ion trap–orbitrap (LTQ-OT) instruments has been mainly carried out with higher-energy C-trap dissociation (HCD) or pulsed q dissociation (PQD). HCD provides good fragmentation of the reporter-ions, but peptide sequence-ion recovery is generally poor compared to collision-induced dissociation (CID). Herein, we describe an approach where CID and HCD spectra are combined. The approach ensures efficiently both identification and relative quantification of proteins. Tandem mass tags (TMTs) were used to label digests of human plasma and LC-MS/MS was performed with an LTQ-OT instrument. Different HCD collision energies were tested. The benefits to use CID and HCD with respect to HCD alone were demonstrated in terms of number of identifications, subsequent number of quantifiable proteins, and quantification accuracy. A program was developed to merge the peptide sequence-ion m/z range from CID spectra and the reporter-ion m/z range from HCD spectra, and alternatively to separate both spectral data into different files. As parallel CID in the LTQ almost doesn't affect the analysis duty cycle, the procedure should become a standard for quantitative analyses of proteins with isobaric tagging using LTQ-OT instruments.     

Index-ion triggered MS2 ion quantification: a novel proteomics approach for reproducible detection and quantification of targeted proteins in complex mixtures

Biomedical research requires protein detection technology that is not only sensitive and quantitative, but that can reproducibly measure any set of proteins in a biological system in a high throughput manner. Here we report the development and application of a targeted proteomics platform termed index-ion triggered MS2 ion quantification (iMSTIQ) that allows reproducible and accurate peptide quantification in complex mixtures. The key feature of iMSTIQ is an approach called index-ion triggered analysis (ITA) that permits the reproducible acquisition of full MS2 spectra of targeted peptides independent of their ion intensities. Accurate quantification is achieved by comparing the relative intensities of multiple pairs of fragment ions derived from isobaric targeted peptides during MS2 analysis. Importantly, the method takes advantage of the favorable performance characteristics of the LTQ-Orbitrap, which include high mass accuracy, resolution, and throughput. As such it provides an attractive targeted proteomics tool to meet the demands of systems biology research and biomarker studies.     

Mass spectrometric quantification of the relative amounts of C6 and C3 position phosphorylated glucosyl residues in starch

The quantification of phosphate bound to the C6 and C3 positions of glucose residues in starch has received increasing interest since the importance of starch phosphorylation for plant metabolism was discovered. The method described here is based on the observation that the isobaric compounds glucose-6-phosphate (Glc6P) and glucose-3-phosphate (Glc3P) exhibit significantly different fragmentation patterns in negative ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). A simple experiment involving collision-induced dissociation (CID) MS² spectra of the sample and the two reference substances Glc3P and Glc6P permitted the quantification of the relative amounts of the two compounds in monosaccharide mixtures generated by acid hydrolysis of starch. The method was tested on well-characterized potato tuber starch. The results are consistent with those obtained by NMR analysis. In contrast to NMR, however, the presented method is fast and can be performed on less than 1 mg of starch. Starch samples of other origins exhibiting a variety of phosphorylation degrees were analyzed to assess the sensitivity and robustness of the method.     

Evaluating the challenges associated with time-of-fight secondary ion mass spectrometry for metabolomics using pure and mixed metabolites

Time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS) is potentially well placed to contribute to metabolomic analysis while bringing the added benefit of high resolution, label free imaging. The focused ion beams used to desorb species from the sample can be focused below 1 μm allowing chemical imaging on a sub-cellular scale. In this study we test the capability of ToF-SIMS to generate mass spectrometry and MSMS spectra from a set of standard metabolites that can be compared with open access metabolite databases containing ESI-CID MSMS spectra. The influence of the chemical environment, the matrix effect, on the observed mass spectra is assessed using a mixed metabolite sample and the data discussed in terms of compound identification and quantification. Radical ions and small fragment ions seem to be less sensitive to ion suppression or enhancement and may provide a route to quantification. Understanding such parameters will be key for the successful application of the technique for in situ metabolomics with ToF-SIMS.