Re-entrainment behavior of Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) with different rhythmic phenotype following light-dark shifts

Djungarian hamsters bred at the authors' institute reveal two distinct circadian phenotypes, the wild-type (WT) and DAO type. The latter is characterized by a delayed activity-onset, probably due to a deficient mechanism for photic entrainment. Experiments with zeitgeber shifts have been performed to gain further insight into the mechanisms underlying this phenomenon. Advancing and delaying phase shifts were produced by a single lengthening or shortening of the dark (D) or light (L) time by 6?h. Motor activity was recorded by passive infrared motion detectors. All WT hamsters re-entrained following various zeitgeber shifts and nearly always in the same direction as the zeitgeber shift. On the other hand, a considerable proportion of the DAO animals failed to re-entrain and showed, instead, diurnal, arrhythmic, or free-running activity patterns. All but one of those hamsters that re-entrained did so by delaying their activity rhythm independently of the direction of the LD shift. Resynchronization occurred faster following a delayed than an advanced shift and also after changes of D rather than L. WT animals tended to re-entrain faster, particularly following a zeitgeber advance (where DAO hamsters re-entrained by an 18-h phase delay instead of a 6-h phase advance). However, the difference between phenotypes was statistically significant only with a shortening of L. To better understand re-entrainment behavior, Type VI phase-response curves (PRCs) were constructed. To do this, both WT and DAO animals were kept under LD conditions, and light pulses (15 min, 100 lux) were applied at different times of the dark span. In WT animals, activity-offset always showed phase advances, whereas activity-onset was phase delayed by light pulses applied during the first half of the dark time and not affected by light pulses applied during the second half. When the light pulse was given at the beginning of D, activity-onset responded more strongly, but light pulses given later in D produced significant changes only in activity-offset. In accord with the delayed activity-onset in DAO hamsters, no or only very weak phase-responses were observed when light pulses were given during the first hours of D. However, the second part of the PRCs was similar to that of WT hamsters, even though it was compressed to an interval of only a few hours and the shifts were smaller. Due to these differences, the first light-on or light-off following an LD shift fell into different phases of the PRC and thus caused different re-entrainment behavior. The results show that it is not only steady-state entrainment that is compromised in DAO hamsters but also their re-entrainment behavior following zeitgeber shifts.     

Short-day response in Djungarian hamsters of different circadian phenotypes

In Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) bred at the authors' institute, a certain number of animals show activity patterns incompatible with proper entrainment of their endogenous circadian pacemaker to the environmental light-dark (LD) cycle. Even though the activity-offset in these animals is stably coupled to "light-on," activity-onset is increasingly delayed, leading to a compression of the activity time (α). If α falls below a critical value, the circadian rhythm in these so called delayed activity-onset (DAO) hamsters starts to free-run and finally breaks down. Animals then show an arrhythmic activity pattern (AR hamsters). Previous studies revealed the mechanisms of photic entrainment have deteriorated (DAO) or the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) does not generate a rhythmic signal (AR). The aim of the present study was to investigate the consequences that these deteriorations have upon photoperiodic time measurement. Animals were bred and kept under standardized housing conditions with food and water ad libitum and a 14L/10D (long day, LD) regimen. Locomotor activity was recorded continuously using passive infrared motion detectors. Body mass, testes size, and fur coloration were measured weekly or biweekly to further quantify the photoperiodic reaction. In a first experiment, adult male wild-type (WT), DAO, and AR hamsters were transferred initially to a 16L/8D cycle. After 3-4 wks, the light period was shortened symmetrically by 8 h. After 14 wks, none of the DAO and AR hamsters, and only 1 of 8 WT hamsters showed short-day (SD) traits. Therefore, in a second experiment, hamsters were transferred to SD conditions (8L/16D cycle) for 8 wks directly from standard LD conditions. In 6 of 7 WT hamsters, activity time expanded, body mass and testes size decreased, and fur coloration changed from summer to winter pelage. In contrast, none of the DAO and AR hamsters displayed an SD response. In a third experiment, DAO and AR hamsters were kept in constant darkness (DD) for 8 and 14 wks. After 8 wks, DAO hamsters showed a similar photoperiodic reaction to WT hamsters that had been kept for 8 wks under SD conditions. However, the level of adaptation was still less compared to WT hamsters, but this difference was not apparent after 14 wks. In contrast, AR animals did not display any photoperiodic reaction, even after 14 wks in DD. Type VI phase response curves (PRCs) were constructed to better understand the mechanism behind the SD response. In WT hamsters, the photosensitive phase, where light pulses induce phase shifts, was lengthened in SD condition. In DAO hamsters, in contrast, the PRCs were similar under LD and SD conditions with a compressed photosensitive phase corresponding to α. Also, "light-on" induced only weak phase advances of activity-onset, insufficient to compensate for the long endogenous period. The results show that physiological mechanisms necessary for seasonal adaptation are working in DAO hamsters and that it is the inadequate interaction of the LD cycle with the SCN that prevents the photoperiodic reaction. AR hamsters, on the other hand, are incapable of measuring photoperiodic time due to a complete disruption of circadian rhythmicity.     

Short-Day Response in Djungarian Hamsters of Different Circadian Phenotypes

In Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) bred at the authors' institute, a certain number of animals show activity patterns incompatible with proper entrainment of their endogenous circadian pacemaker to the environmental light-dark (LD) cycle. Even though the activity-offset in these animals is stably coupled to “light-on,” activity-onset is increasingly delayed, leading to a compression of the activity time (α). If α falls below a critical value, the circadian rhythm in these so called delayed activity-onset (DAO) hamsters starts to free-run and finally breaks down. Animals then show an arrhythmic activity pattern (AR hamsters). Previous studies revealed the mechanisms of photic entrainment have deteriorated (DAO) or the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) does not generate a rhythmic signal (AR). The aim of the present study was to investigate the consequences that these deteriorations have upon photoperiodic time measurement. Animals were bred and kept under standardized housing conditions with food and water ad libitum and a 14L/10D (long day, LD) regimen. Locomotor activity was recorded continuously using passive infrared motion detectors. Body mass, testes size, and fur coloration were measured weekly or biweekly to further quantify the photoperiodic reaction. In a first experiment, adult male wild-type (WT), DAO, and AR hamsters were transferred initially to a 16L/8D cycle. After 3–4 wks, the light period was shortened symmetrically by 8?h. After 14 wks, none of the DAO and AR hamsters, and only 1 of 8 WT hamsters showed short-day (SD) traits. Therefore, in a second experiment, hamsters were transferred to SD conditions (8L/16D cycle) for 8 wks directly from standard LD conditions. In 6 of 7 WT hamsters, activity time expanded, body mass and testes size decreased, and fur coloration changed from summer to winter pelage. In contrast, none of the DAO and AR hamsters displayed an SD response. In a third experiment, DAO and AR hamsters were kept in constant darkness (DD) for 8 and 14 wks. After 8 wks, DAO hamsters showed a similar photoperiodic reaction to WT hamsters that had been kept for 8 wks under SD conditions. However, the level of adaptation was still less compared to WT hamsters, but this difference was not apparent after 14 wks. In contrast, AR animals did not display any photoperiodic reaction, even after 14 wks in DD. Type VI phase response curves (PRCs) were constructed to better understand the mechanism behind the SD response. In WT hamsters, the photosensitive phase, where light pulses induce phase shifts, was lengthened in SD condition. In DAO hamsters, in contrast, the PRCs were similar under LD and SD conditions with a compressed photosensitive phase corresponding to α. Also, “light-on” induced only weak phase advances of activity-onset, insufficient to compensate for the long endogenous period. The results show that physiological mechanisms necessary for seasonal adaptation are working in DAO hamsters and that it is the inadequate interaction of the LD cycle with the SCN that prevents the photoperiodic reaction. AR hamsters, on the other hand, are incapable of measuring photoperiodic time due to a complete disruption of circadian rhythmicity.     

Non-parametric photic entrainment of Djungarian hamsters with different rhythmic phenotypes

To investigate the role of non-parametric light effects in entrainment, Djungarian hamsters of two different circadian phenotypes were exposed to skeleton photoperiods, or to light pulses at different circadian times, to compile phase response curves (PRCs). Wild-type (WT) hamsters show daily rhythms of locomotor activity in accord with the ambient light/dark conditions, with activity onset and offset strongly coupled to light-off and light-on, respectively. Hamsters of the delayed activity onset (DAO) phenotype, in contrast, progressively delay their activity onset, whereas activity offset remains coupled to light-on. The present study was performed to better understand the underlying mechanisms of this phenomenon. Hamsters of DAO and WT phenotypes were kept first under standard housing conditions with a 14:10 h light–dark cycle, and then exposed to skeleton photoperiods (one or two 15-min light pulses of 100 lx at the times of the former light–dark and/or dark–light transitions). In a second experiment, hamsters of both phenotypes were transferred to constant darkness and allowed to free-run until the lengths of the active (α) and resting (ρ) periods were equal (α:ρ = 1). At this point, animals were then exposed to light pulses (100 lx, 15 min) at different circadian times (CTs). Phase and period changes were estimated separately for activity onset and offset. When exposed to skeleton-photoperiods with one or two light pulses, the daily activity patterns of DAO and WT hamsters were similar to those obtained under conditions of a complete 14:10 h light–dark cycle. However, in the case of giving only one light pulse at the time of the former light–dark transition, animals temporarily free-ran until activity offset coincided with the light pulse. These results show that photic entrainment of the circadian activity rhythm is attained primarily via non-parametric mechanisms, with the “morning” light pulse being the essential cue. In the second experiment, typical photic PRCs were obtained with phase delays in the first half of the subjective night, phase advances in the second half, and a dead zone during the subjective day. ANOVA indicated no significant differences between WT and DAO animals despite a significantly longer free-running period (tau) in DAO hamsters. Considering the phase shifts induced around CT0 and the different period lengths, it was possible to model the entrainment patterns of both phenotypes. It was shown that light-induced phase shifts of activity offset were sufficient to compensate for the long tau in WT and DAO hamsters, thus enabling a stable entrainment of their activity offsets to be achieved. With respect to activity onsets, phase shifts were sufficient only in WT animals; in DAO hamsters, activity onset showed increasing delays. The results of the present paper clearly demonstrate that, under laboratory conditions, the non-parametric component of light and dark leads to circadian entrainment in Djungarian hamsters. However, a stable entrainment of activity onset can be achieved only if the free-running period does not exceed a certain value. With longer tau values, hamsters reveal a DAO phenotype. Under field conditions, therefore, non-photic cues/zeitgebers must obviously be involved to enable a proper circadian entrainment.     

Light-induced c-Fos expression in the SCN and behavioural phase shifts of Djungarian hamsters with a delayed activity onset

C-Fos expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and phase shifts of the activity rhythm following photic stimulation were investigated in Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) of two different circadian phenotypes. Wild-type (WT) hamsters display robust daily patterns of locomotor activity according to the light/dark conditions. Hamsters of the DAO (delayed activity onset) phenotype, however, progressively delay the activity onset, whereas activity offset remains coupled to “light-on”. Although the exact reason for the delayed activity onset is not yet clarified, it is connected with a disturbed interaction between the light/dark cycle and the circadian clock. The aim was to test the link between photoreception and the behavioral output of the circadian system in hamsters of both phenotypes, to get further insight in the underlying mechanism of the DAO phenomenon. Animals were exposed to short light pulses at different times during the dark period to analyze phase shifts of the activity rhythm and expression of Fos protein in the SCN. The results indicate that the photosensitive phase in DAO hamsters is shifted like the activity onset. Also, phase shifts were significantly smaller in DAO hamsters. At the same time, levels of Fos expression did not differ between phenotypes regarding the circadian phase. The results provide evidence that the shifted photosensitivity of the circadian system in DAO hamsters does not differ from that of WT animals, and lead us to conclude that processes within the SCN that enable light information to reset the circadian pacemaker might offer an explanation for the DAO phenomenon.     

Modeling circadian rhythm generation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus with locally coupled self-sustained oscillators: phase shifts and phase response curves

Circadian rhythm generation in the suprachiasmatic nucleus was modeled by locally coupled self-sustained oscillators. The model is composed of 10,000 oscillators, arranged in a square array. Coupling between oscillators and standard deviation of (randomly determined) intrinsic oscillator periods were varied. A stable overall rhythm emerged. The model behavior was investigated for phase shifts of a 24-h zeitgeber cycle. Prolongation of either the dark or the light phase resulted in a lengthening of the period, whereas shortening of the dark or the light phase shortened the period. The model's response to shifts in the light-dark cycle was dependent only on the extent of the shift and was insensitive to changes in parameters. Phase response curves (PRC) and amplitude response curves were determined for single and triple 5-h light pulses (1000 lux). Single pulses lead to type 1 PRCs with larger phase shifts for weak coupling. Triple pulses generally evoked type 1 PRCs with the exception of weak coupling, where a type 0 PRC was observed.     

Combinations of bright light, scheduled dark, sunglasses, and melatonin to facilitate circadian entrainment to night shift work

Various combinations of interventions were used to phase-delay circadian rhythms to correct their misalignment with night work and day sleep. Young participants (median age = 22, n = 67) participated in 5 consecutive simulated night shifts (2300 to 0700) and then slept at home (0830 to 1530) in darkened bedrooms. Participants wore sunglasses with normal or dark lenses (transmission 15% or 2%) when outside during the day. Participants took placebo or melatonin (1.8 mg sustained release) before daytime sleep. During the night shifts, participants were exposed to a moving (delaying) pattern of intermittent bright light (approximately 5000 lux, 20 min on, 40 min off, 4-5 light pulses/night) or remained in dim light (approximately 150 lux). There were 6 intervention groups ranging from the least complex (normal sunglasses) to the most complex (dark sunglasses + bright light + melatonin). The dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) was assessed before and after the night shifts (baseline and final), and 7 h was added to estimate the temperature minimum (Tmin). Participants were categorized by their amount of reentrainment based on their final Tmin: not re-entrained (Tmin before the daytime dark/sleep period), partially re-entrained (Tmin during the first half of dark/sleep), or completely re-entrained (Tmin during the second half of dark/ sleep). The sample was split into earlier participants (baseline Tmin < or = 0700, sunlight during the commute home fell after the Tmin) and later participants (baseline Tmin > 0700). The later participants were completely re-entrained regardless of intervention group, whereas the degree of re-entrainment for the earlier participants depended on the interventions. With bright light during the night shift, almost all of the earlier participants achieved complete re-entrainment, and the phase delay shift was so large that darker sunglasses and melatonin could not increase its magnitude. With only room light during the night shift, darker sunglasses helped earlier participants phase-delay more than normal sunglasses, but melatonin did not increase the phase delay. The authors recommend the combination of intermittent bright light during the night shift, sunglasses (as dark as possible) during the commute home, and a regular, early daytime dark/sleep period if the goal is complete circadian adaptation to night-shift work.     

The daily melatonin pattern in Djungarian hamsters depends on the circadian phenotype

Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) bred at the Institute of Halle reveal three different circadian phenotypes. The wild type (WT) shows normal locomotor activity patterns, whereas in hamsters of the DAO (delayed activity onset) type, the activity onset is continuously delayed. Since the activity offset in those hamsters remains coupled to "light-on," the activity time becomes compressed. Hamsters of the AR (arrhythmic) type are episodically active throughout the 24 h. Previous studies showed that a disturbed interaction of the circadian system with the light-dark (LD) cycle contributes to the phenomenon observed in DAO hamsters. To gain better insight into the underlying mechanisms, the authors investigated the daily melatonin rhythm, as it is a reliable marker of the circadian clock. Hamsters were kept individually under standardized laboratory conditions (LD 14:10, T=22°C±2°C, food and water ad libitum). WT, DAO (with exactly 5 h delay of activity onset), and AR hamsters were used for pineal melatonin and urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (aMT6s) measurement. Pineal melatonin content was determined at 3 time points: 4 h after "light-off" [D+4], 1 h before "light-on" [L-1], and 1h after "light-on" [L+1]). The 24-h profile of melatonin secretion was investigated by transferring the animals to metabolic cages for 27?h to collect urine at 3-h intervals for aMT6s analysis. WT hamsters showed high pineal melatonin content during the dark time (D+4, L-1), which significantly decreased at the beginning of the light period (L+1). In contrast, DAO hamsters displayed low melatonin levels during the part of the dark period when animals were still resting (D+4). At the end of the dark period (L-1), melatonin content increased significantly and declined again when light was switched on (L+1). AR hamsters showed low melatonin levels, comparable to daytime values, at all 3 time points. The results were confirmed by aMT6s data. WT hamsters showed a marked circadian pattern of aMT6s excretion. The concentration started to increase 3?h after "light-off" and reached daytime values 5 h after "light-on." In DAO hamsters, in contrast, aMT6s excretion started about 6?h later and reached significantly lower levels compared to WT hamsters. In AR animals, aMT6s excretion was low at all times. The results clearly indicate the rhythm of melatonin secretion in DAO hamsters is delayed in accord with their delayed activity onset, whereas AR hamsters display no melatonin rhythm at all. Since the regulatory pathways for the rhythms of locomotor activity and melatonin synthesis (which are downstream from the suprachiasmatic nucleus [SCN]) are different but obviously convey the same signal, we conclude that the origin of the phenomenon observed in DAO hamsters must be located upstream of the SCN, or in the SCN itself.     

The Daily Melatonin Pattern in Djungarian Hamsters Depends on the Circadian Phenotype

Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) bred at the Institute of Halle reveal three different circadian phenotypes. The wild type (WT) shows normal locomotor activity patterns, whereas in hamsters of the DAO (delayed activity onset) type, the activity onset is continuously delayed. Since the activity offset in those hamsters remains coupled to “light-on,” the activity time becomes compressed. Hamsters of the AR (arrhythmic) type are episodically active throughout the 24?h. Previous studies showed that a disturbed interaction of the circadian system with the light-dark (LD) cycle contributes to the phenomenon observed in DAO hamsters. To gain better insight into the underlying mechanisms, the authors investigated the daily melatonin rhythm, as it is a reliable marker of the circadian clock. Hamsters were kept individually under standardized laboratory conditions (LD 14:10, T?=?22°C?±?2°C, food and water ad libitum). WT, DAO (with exactly 5?h delay of activity onset), and AR hamsters were used for pineal melatonin and urinary 6-sulfatoxymelatonin (aMT6s) measurement. Pineal melatonin content was determined at 3 time points: 4?h after “light-off” [D?+?4], 1?h before “light-on” [L???1], and 1?h after “light-on” [L?+?1]). The 24-h profile of melatonin secretion was investigated by transferring the animals to metabolic cages for 27?h to collect urine at 3-h intervals for aMT6s analysis. WT hamsters showed high pineal melatonin content during the dark time (D?+?4, L???1), which significantly decreased at the beginning of the light period (L?+?1). In contrast, DAO hamsters displayed low melatonin levels during the part of the dark period when animals were still resting (D?+?4). At the end of the dark period (L???1), melatonin content increased significantly and declined again when light was switched on (L?+?1). AR hamsters showed low melatonin levels, comparable to daytime values, at all 3 time points. The results were confirmed by aMT6s data. WT hamsters showed a marked circadian pattern of aMT6s excretion. The concentration started to increase 3?h after “light-off” and reached daytime values 5?h after “light-on.” In DAO hamsters, in contrast, aMT6s excretion started about 6?h later and reached significantly lower levels compared to WT hamsters. In AR animals, aMT6s excretion was low at all times. The results clearly indicate the rhythm of melatonin secretion in DAO hamsters is delayed in accord with their delayed activity onset, whereas AR hamsters display no melatonin rhythm at all. Since the regulatory pathways for the rhythms of locomotor activity and melatonin synthesis (which are downstream from the suprachiasmatic nucleus [SCN]) are different but obviously convey the same signal, we conclude that the origin of the phenomenon observed in DAO hamsters must be located upstream of the SCN, or in the SCN itself. (Author correspondence: weinert@zoologie.uni-halle.de)     

Light induces c-fos and per1 expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus of arrhythmic hamsters

Locomotor activity rhythms in a significant proportion of Siberian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus sungorus) become arrhythmic after the light-dark (LD) cycle is phase-delayed by 5 h. Arrhythmia is apparent within a few days and persists indefinitely despite the presence of the photocycle. The failure of arrhythmic hamsters to regain rhythms while housed in the LD cycle, as well as the lack of any masking of activity, suggested that the circadian system of these animals had become insensitive to light. We tested this hypothesis by examining light-induced gene expression in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Several weeks after the phase delay, arrhythmic and re-entrained hamsters were housed in constant darkness (DD) for 24 h and administered a 30-min light pulse 2 h after predicted dark onset because light induces c-fos and per1 genes at this time in entrained animals. Brains were then removed, and tissue sections containing the SCN were processed for in situ hybridization and probed with c-fos and per1 mRNA probes made from Siberian hamster cDNA. Contrary to our prediction, light pulses induced robust expression of both c-fos and per1 in all re-entrained and arrhythmic hamsters. A separate group of animals held in DD for 10 days after the light pulse remained arrhythmic. Thus, even though the SCN of these animals responded to light, neither the LD cycle nor DD restored rhythms, as it does in other species made arrhythmic by constant light (LL). These results suggest that different mechanisms underlie arrhythmicity induced by LL or by a phase delay of the LD cycle. Whereas LL induces arrhythmicity by desynchronizing SCN neurons, phase delay-induced arrhythmicity may be due to a loss of circadian rhythms at the level of individual SCN neurons.     

Effect of Behavioural Feedback on Circadian Clocks of the Nocturnal Field Mouse Mus booduga

The effect of 'novel running wheels' on circadian clocks of the nocturnal field mouse Mus booduga was investigated during free-running and entrained conditions. In order to find out whether daily access to novel running wheels can entrain the locomotor activity rhythms experimental animals (n = 6) were provided with 'novel running wheels' at a fixed time of the day. The control animals (n = 5) were handled similar to the experimental animals but were not given access to novel running wheels. The results show that daily access to novel running wheels entrained the free-running locomotor activity rhythm of these mice. The post-entrainment free-running period (τ) of the experimental animals was significantly shorter than the pre-entrainment τ, whereas the pre- and post-treatment τ of the control animals did not differ significantly. In separate set of experiments, the effect of access to novel running wheels on the rate of re-entrainment was studied after a 6 h phase advance/delay in 24 h (12:12 h) light/dark (LD) cycles. Experimental animals were given access to novel running wheels for 3-h, 1 h after the 'lights-off' only on the first day of the 'new LD cycles'. Experimental animals took fewer cycles to re-entrain to 6-h phase advanced LD cycles compared to the control animals. After a phase delay in the LD cycles by 6h, the experimental animals took more number of cycles to re-entrain compared to the control animals. These results thus suggest that access to novel running wheel can act as a Zeitgeber for the circadian clocks of the nocturnal mouse M. booduga, and can also modify the rates of re-entrainment to phase shifted LD cycles, in a time-dependent manner.     

Large phase-shifts of circadian rhythms caused by induced running in a re-entrainment paradigm: The role of pulse duration and light

Summary Bouts of induced wheel-running, 3 h long, accelerate the rate of re-entrainment of hamsters' activity rhythms to light-dark (LD) cycles that have been phase-advanced by 8 h (Mrosovsky and Salmon 1987). The bouts of running are given early in the first night of the new LD cycle, and by the second night the phase advance in activity onset already averages 7 h. Such large shifts contrast with the mean phase advance of <1 h at the peak of the phase response curve when hamsters in constant darkness (DD) experience 2-h pulses of induced activity (Reebs and Mrosovsky 1989). The present paper investigates pulse duration and light as possible causes for the discrepancy in shift amplitude between these two studies. In a first experiment, pulses of induced wheel-running 1 h, 3 h, or 5 h long were given at circadian times (CT) 6 and 22-2 to hamsters free-running in DD. Pulses given at CT 6 caused phase-advances of up to 2.8 h, whereas pulses at CT 22-2 resulted in delays of up to 1.0 h. Shifts after 3-h and 5-h pulses did not differ, but were larger than after 1-h pulses, and larger than after the 2-h pulses given in DD by Reebs and Mrosovsky (1989). Thus 3 h appears to be the minimum pulse duration necessary to obtain maximum phase-shifting effects. In a second experiment, the re-entrainment design of Mrosovsky and Salmon (1987) was repeated with the light portion of the shifted LD cycle eliminated. Hamsters exercised for 3 h phase-advanced 2.9 h on average (excluding 2 animals who ran poorly). When the same hamsters were exposed 7 days later to a 14-h light pulse starting 5 h after their activity onset, they advanced by an average of 3.3 h. Adding the average values for activity-induced shifts and light-induced shifts gives a total of about 6 h. Possible synergism between the effects of induced activity and those of light may account for the remaining small difference between this total and the 7-h advances previously reported.Abbreviations CT circadian time - DD constant darkness - LD light-dark - PRC phase response curve - free-running period of rhythm     

Circadian clock resetting by sleep deprivation without exercise in Syrian hamsters: dark pulses revisited

Circadian rhythms in Syrian hamsters can be phase shifted by procedures that stimulate wheel running ("exercise") in the mid-subjective day (the hamster's usual sleep period). The authors recently demonstrated that keeping hamsters awake by gentle handling, without continuous running, is sufficient to mimic this effect. Here, the authors assessed whether wakefulness, independent of wheel running, also mediates phase shifts to dark pulses during the midsubjective day in hamsters free-running in constant light (LL). With running wheels locked during a 3 h dark pulse on day 3 of LL, hamsters (N = 16) averaged only 43+/-15 min of spontaneous wake time and phase shifted only 24+/-43 min. When wheels were open during a dark pulse, two hamsters remained awake, ran continuously, and showed phase advance shifts of 7.3 h and 8.7 h, respectively, whereas the other hamsters were awake <60 min and shifted only 45+/-38 min. No animals stayed awake for 3 h without running. Additional time in LL (10 and 20 days) did not potentiate the waking or phase shift response to dark pulses. When all hamsters were sleep deprived with wheels locked during a dark pulse, phase advance shifts averaged 261+/-110 min and ranged up to 7.3 h. These shifts are large compared to those previously observed in response to the 3 h sleep deprivation procedure. Additional tests revealed that this potentiated shift response is dependent on LL prior to sleep deprivation but not LL after sleep deprivation. A final sleep deprivation test showed that a small part of the potentiation may be due to suppression of spontaneous wheel running by LL. These results indicate that some correlate of waking, other than continuous running, mediates the phase-shifting effect of dark pulses in the mid-subjective day. The mechanism by which LL potentiates shifting remains to be determined. The lack of effect of subsequent LL on the magnitude of shifts to sleep deprivation in the dark suggests that LL reduces responsivity to light by processes that take >3 h of dark to reverse.     

The hamster clock phase-response curve from summerlike light:dark cycles and its role in daily and seasonal timekeeping

We address the subject of entrainment of the hamster clock by the day:night cycle in summer when the sun sets after 6 PM and rises before 6 AM (nights < 12 h). Summer day:night cycles were simulated by 6 light:dark (LD) cycles with D < 12 h (summerlike, SLD) ranging from SLD 12.5 h:11.5 h (D, 6:15 PM-5:45 AM) to 18 h:6 h (D, 9 PM-3 AM). These are the near limiting SLDs for constant PM timing (entrainment) of behavioral estrus and wheel running in hamsters. The onset of estrus was observed every 4 d in the same hamsters as a phase marker of their 24 h clock. On the day before an experimental estrus, preceded and followed by control onsets, a dark period was imposed to cover a putative 6 PM-6 AM light-sensitive period (LSP). This was scanned with a light pulse (and periodic 5 sec bell alarms) lasting 5-240 min. Shifts in onset of estrus on the next day were plotted vs. the end of the light pulse for PM times ("dusk") and its onset for AM times ("dawn"). The resulting phase shifts from the six SLDs were similar, permitting their combination into a single phase-response curve (PRC) of 1605 shifts. This SLD composite PRC rose at 10:15 PM, peaked at 2 AM (81 min advanced shift), fell linearly to 5:55 AM, and then abruptly to normal at 6 AM (no shift). Peak shift was unaffected by light pulse duration or intensity, or hamster age. The SLD composite PRC lacked the 6 PM-9 PM curve of delayed shifts present in reported PRCs from LD 12 h:12 h and DD. However, a two-pulse experiment showed that all light from 6 PM to L-off was needed to block (balance) the advancing action of a 5 min morning light pulse, thereby maintaining entrainment. A working hypothesis to explain daily entrainment and seasonal fertility in the golden hamster is illustrated. A nomenclature for labeling the phases of the hamster clock (circadian time) is proposed.     

THE HAMSTER CLOCK PHASE-RESPONSE CURVE FROM SUMMERLIKE LIGHT:DARK CYCLES AND ITS ROLE IN DAILY AND SEASONAL TIMEKEEPING

We address the subject of entrainment of the hamster clock by the day:night cycle in summer when the sun sets after 6 PM and rises before 6 AM (nights<12 h). Summer day:night cycles were simulated by 6 light:dark (LD) cycles with D<12 h (summerlike, SLD) ranging from SLD 12.5h:11.5h (D, 6:15 PM–5:45 AM) to 18h:6h (D, 9 PM–3 AM). These are the near limiting SLDs for constant PM timing (entrainment) of behavioral estrus and wheel running in hamsters. The onset of estrus was observed every 4 d in the same hamsters as a phase marker of their 24h clock. On the day before an experimental estrus, preceded and followed by control onsets, a dark period was imposed to cover a putative 6 PM–6 AM light-sensitive period (LSP). This was scanned with a light pulse (and periodic 5sec bell alarms) lasting 5–240 min. Shifts in onset of estrus on the next day were plotted vs. the end of the light pulse for PM times (“dusk”) and its onset for AM times (“dawn”). The resulting phase shifts from the six SLDs were similar, permitting their combination into a single phase-response curve (PRC) of 1605 shifts. This SLD composite PRC rose at 10:15 PM, peaked at 2 AM (81min advanced shift), fell linearly to 5:55 AM, and then abruptly to normal at 6 AM (no shift). Peak shift was unaffected by light pulse duration or intensity, or hamster age. The SLD composite PRC lacked the 6 PM–9 PM curve of delayed shifts present in reported PRCs from LD 12h:12h and DD. However, a two-pulse experiment showed that all light from 6 PM to L-off was needed to block (balance) the advancing action of a 5min morning light pulse, thereby maintaining entrainment. A working hypothesis to explain daily entrainment and seasonal fertility in the golden hamster is illustrated. A nomenclature for labeling the phases of the hamster clock (circadian time) is proposed.     

Effects of light intensity and restraint on dark-pulse-induced circadian phase shifting during subjective night in Syrian hamsters

Dark pulses presented on a background of constant light (LL) result in phase advances during midsubjective day and early subjective night, and phase delays during late subjective night, as shown in the dark-pulse phase response curve. In hamsters, the phase-shifting effects of dark pulses are thought to be mediated by increased activity, as previous studies have shown that restraining animals during dark pulses blocks the phase shifts observed in midsubjective day and late subjective night. This study focuses on dark-pulse-induced phase shifting during early subjective night, examining the influence of both LL intensity and restraint on the magnitude of these phase shifts. Syrian hamsters were maintained in LL of four different illumination levels (1, 10, 100, or 600 lux) and periodically presented with 6-h pulses (dark pulse alone, restraint alone, or dark pulse plus restraint) beginning at circadian time 11. Phase advances were observed in response to dark pulses alone, and the magnitude of these shifts was dependent on background illumination, with significantly larger advances seen under higher intensities. No relationship was found between the amount of activity displayed during dark pulses and phase shift magnitude. Six-hour periods of restraint resulted in phase delays, the magnitude of which was also dependent on background illumination. Restraining hamsters during dark pulses reduced the magnitude of phase advances, but the extent of this reduction could be predicted from the additive effects of the dark-pulse-alone and restraint-alone conditions. These results indicate that the phase-shifting effects of dark pulses during early subjective night are not mediated by behavioral activation and may instead reflect a mirror image of the phase-delaying effects of light pulses at this phase.     

Djungarian hamsters: a species with a labile circadian pacemaker? Arrhythmicity under a light-dark cycle induced by short light pulses

In most cases, phase-shifting effects of light pulses are studied in animals kept in constant darkness (DD) or in animals released into DD following the stimulus. In this study, the authors exposed Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) to short light pulses during the dark phase of a 16:8 light-dark (LD) cycle and thus obtained a type VI phase response curve. Light pulses early in the night caused phase delays of the activity onset as well as phase advances of the activity offset, whereas light pulses later in the night resulted in phase advances of the activity offset only. A combination of two 15-min light pulses-the first one given late in the scotophase and the second given early in the dark phase of the following night-led to a strong compression of the activity phase alpha. In 75% of all animals, daily rhythms were no longer visible after complete alpha compression, and long-term arrhythmicity (up to 145 days) persisted despite continued exposure to an LD cycle. Because three independent output rhythms of the clock (i.e., activity, body temperature, and melatonin rhythms) were equally affected, the authors conclude that overt arrhythmicity was due not merely to disrupted output pathways but to an altered state of the central pacemaker. The authors suggest a qualitative two-oscillator model to explain this phenomenon. Their hypothesis assumes that, due to loose coupling, the pacemaker of Djungarian hamsters can be driven to a state of zero phase difference between the two oscillators, with zero amplitude of their outputs.     

Phenotypic differences in reentrainment behavior and sensitivity to nighttime light pulses in siberian hamsters

Spontaneous reentrainment to phase shifts of the photocycle is a fundamental property of all circadian systems. Siberian hamsters are, however, unique in this regard because most fail to reentrain when the LD cycle (16-h light/day) is phase delayed by 5 h. In the present study, the authors compared reentrainment responses in hamsters from 2 colonies. One colony descended from animals trapped in the wild more than 30 years ago (designated "nonentrainers"), and the other colony was outbred as recently as 13 years ago (designated "entrainers"). As reported previously, only 10% of hamsters from the nonentrainer colony reentrained to a 5-h phase delay of the LD cycle. By contrast, 75% of animals from the entrainer colony reentrained to the phase shift. Another goal of this study was to test the hypothesis that failure to reentrain was a consequence of light exposure during the middle of the night on the day of the 5-h phase delay. This hypothesis was tested by exposing animals to 2 h of light during the early, middle, or late part of the night and then subjecting them on the next day to a 3-h phase delay of the photocycle, which is a phase shift to which all hamsters normally reentrain. All animals from both colonies reentrained when light pulses occurred early in the night, but more animals from the entrainer colony, compared to the nonentrainer colony, reentrained when the light pulse occurred in the middle or late part of the night. The phenotypic variation in reentrainment responses is similar to the variation in photoperiodic responsiveness previously reported for these 2 colonies. Phenotypic variation in both traits is due to underlying differences in circadian organization and suggests a common genetic basis for reentrainment responses and photoperiodic responsiveness.     

The Annual Activity Pattern of Djungarian Hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) Is Affected by Wheel‐Running Activity

Djungarian hamsters (Phodopus sungorus) exhibit pronounced winter acclimatization with changes in body mass, gonads, fur, and thermogenic capacity induced by decreasing daylength. To determine whether the annual activity pattern reflects the crucial role of the photoperiod for the hamsters' seasonality, animals with and without access to a running wheel (RW) were exposed to natural lighting conditions (～52°N) and ambient temperatures. Registration of locomotion in hamsters with a RW revealed a clear activity pattern closely related to dusk and dawn throughout the year. In contrast, animals without RW access showed a less stable phase relationship between the activity and the day‐night cycle in autumn and winter. During these seasons, the activity phase either exceeded the dark phase or even became indistinguishable from the rest phase. This correlated not only with increased locomotion during the light phase but also over the whole 24 h period, especially in autumn. In RW hamsters, a similar but attenuated trend was found that possibly reflects foraging due to increased food hoarding before winter. The more stable correlation between activity time and night length in RW hamsters might be explained by a suppressing effect of light on wheel‐running behavior (negative masking) and/or a stabilizing effect of running exercise on rhythmicity. In a further experiment, the phase‐reference points lights‐off and lights‐on within artificial light‐dark (LD) cycles were compared to sunset and sunrise in an intermediate ratio of light and dark and in long days. With respect to the defined phase‐reference points of the zeitgeber, the phase relation between activity and the LD cycle was similar in natural and corresponding artificial lighting conditions, and dependent on the LD ratio.     

Enhanced masking response to light in hamsters with IGL lesions

Syrian hamsters with intergeniculate leaflet or sham lesions were given tests with a series of light pulses of gradually decreasing intensities. The light pulses were given early in the night, at zeitgeber time 14–15. The amount of wheel running during the pulses was compared to that in the same hour on a night with no light pulses. Hamsters with intergeniculate leaflet lesions showed a significantly greater suppression of their wheel running in response to light than the sham-lesioned animals. The lesioned animals also had larger negative phase angles of entrainment to the 14:10-h light-dark cycle than sham-operated controls. However, phase shifting in response to light pulses at either zeitgeber time 14 or 18 was not significantly altered by the lesions. Preferences for spending more time in a dark than a light area were not abolished by the lesions. It is concluded that the intergeniculate leaflet in the Syrian hamster cannot be of paramount importance for masking of locomotor activity by light but may play a modulating role. Accepted: 30 January 1999