The circadian program of algae

The endogenous circadian program enables organisms to cope with the temporal ecology of their environment. It is driven by a molecular pacemaker, which is found in animals as well as plants at the level of the single cell. Unicellular organisms are, therefore, ideal model systems for the study of circadian systems because rhythms can be investigated in single cells at the molecular, physiological, behavioral and environmental level. In this review, we discuss the possible driving forces for the evolution of circadian rhythmicity in unicellular marine organisms. The current knowledge about the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved in the different components of the circadian system (input, oscillator and output) are described primarily with reference to the marine dinoflagellate,Gonyaulax polyedra. Light is the most important and best described environmental signal synchronizing the endogenous rhythms to the 24-hour solar day. However, little is known about the nature of circadian light receptors, which appear to be distinct from those that control behavioral light responses such as phototaxis. It has recently been shown inGonyaulaxthat nutrients, namely nitrate, can act as a non-photic zeitgeber for the circadian system. In this alga, bioluminescence is under circadian control, and the molecular mechanisms of this circadian output have been investigated in detail. The circadian program turns out to be more complex than simply consisting of an input pathway, a pacemaker and the driven rhythms. Different rhythms appear to be controlled by separate pacemakers, even in single cells, and both circadian inputs and outputs contain feedback loops. The functional advantages of this complexity are discussed. Finally, we outline the differences between the circadian program under laboratory and natural conditions.     

A neural clockwork for encoding circadian time.

Many daily biological rhythms are governed by an innate timekeeping mechanism or clock. Endogenous, temperature-compensated circadian clocks have been localized to discrete sites within the nervous systems of a number of organisms. In mammals, the master circadian pacemaker is the bilaterally paired suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) in the anterior hypothalamus. The SCN is composed of multiple single cell oscillators that must synchronize to each other and the environmental light schedule. Other tissues, including those outside the nervous system, have also been shown to express autonomous circadian periodicities. This review examines 1) how intracellular regulatory molecules function in the oscillatory mechanism and in its entrainment to environmental cycles; 2) how individual SCN cells interact to create an integrated tissue pacemaker with coherent metabolic, electrical, and secretory rhythms; and 3) how such clock outputs are converted into temporal programs for the whole organism.     

Intercellular coupling mechanism for synchronized and noise-resistant circadian oscillators

The circadian clock in multicellular organisms consists of multiple autonomous single-cell oscillators. These individual oscillator cells produce coherent oscillations even in the presence of internal noise associated with rhythm-generating reaction rates and in the absence of external time cues such as light and temperature. Thus, an intercellular coupling mechanism must synchronize the cells to induce coherent circadian oscillations. We propose the roles of a synchronizing factor that is secreted from individual cells during subjective day to induce light-pulse-type phase shifts in the neighboring cells or, alternatively, a factor that is secreted during subjective night to induce dark-pulse-type phase shifts. Here, we present our multicellular stochastic model of Drosophila circadian rhythms that emulates the intercellular coupling mechanism and suggest that the mechanism facilitates the constancy of the circadian rhythm with possible functional redundancy among different synchronizing factors.     

Effects of Histamine on Circadian Rhythms and Hibernation

Histamine appears to play a role in regulation of sleep and arousal as well as in synchronizing endogenous circadian rhythms with exogenous photic cues. Direct application of histamine to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the site of the mammalian circadian pacemaker, phase shifts the circadian rhythm in neural activity. Intraventricular injections of histamine also phase shift circadian rhythms as do micro-injections directed towards the SCN. The magnitude and direction of the phase shifting effects of histamine depend on circadian phase in a manner similar to light. Depletion of brain histamine levels by inhibition of histamine synthesis reduces phase shifts to light. Histamine appears to influence phase shifts to light via a direct modulation of NMDA receptors in the SCN. Increased histamine levels and turnover observed in hibernating animals render it possible that histamine is a key regulator of hibernation. Thus histamine participates in an important link between sleep, circadian rhythms, and hibernation.     

Effects of Histamine on Circadian Rhythms and Hibernation

Histamine appears to play a role in regulation of sleep and arousal as well as in synchronizing endogenous circadian rhythms with exogenous photic cues. Direct application of histamine to the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), the site of the mammalian circadian pacemaker, phase shifts the circadian rhythm in neural activity. Intraventricular injections of histamine also phase shift circadian rhythms as do micro-injections directed towards the SCN. The magnitude and direction of the phase shifting effects of histamine depend on circadian phase in a manner similar to light. Depletion of brain histamine levels by inhibition of histamine synthesis reduces phase shifts to light. Histamine appears to influence phase shifts to light via a direct modulation of NMDA receptors in the SCN. Increased histamine levels and turnover observed in hibernating animals render it possible that histamine is a key regulator of hibernation. Thus histamine participates in an important link between sleep, circadian rhythms, and hibernation.     

A forced desynchrony study of circadian pacemaker characteristics in seasonal affective disorder

The circadian pacemaker is an endogenous clock that regulates oscillations in most physiological and psychological processes with a near 24-h period. In many species, this pacemaker triggers seasonal changes in behavior. The seasonality of symptoms and the efficacy of light therapy suggest involvement of the circadian pacemaker in seasonal affective disorder (SAD), winter type. In this study, circadian pacemaker characteristics of SAD patients were compared with those of controls. Seven SAD patients and matched controls were subjected to a 120-h forced desynchrony protocol, in which core body temperature and melatonin secretion profiles were measured for the characterization of circadian pacemaker parameters. During this protocol, which enables the study of unmasked circadian pacemaker characteristics, subjects were exposed to six 20-h days in time isolation. Patients participated twice in winter (while depressed and while remitted after light therapy) and once in summer. Controls participated once in winter and once in summer. Between the SAD patients and controls, no significant differences were observed in the melatonin-derived period or in the phase of the endogenous circadian temperature rhythm. The amplitude of this rhythm was significantly smaller in depressed and remitted SAD patients than in controls. No abnormalities of the circadian pacemaker were observed in SAD patients. A disturbance in thermoregulatory processes might explain the smaller circadian temperature amplitude in SAD patients during winter.     

Circadian Biology: A Neuropeptide Is Bound To Activate Its Receptor

How do circadian pacemaker neurons provide timekeeping signals by which daily rhythms are organized? Recent technological innovations in the fruitfly model system have allowed observations which suggest some important synchronizing signals may themselves not be gated.     

The end effector of circadian heart rate variation: the sinoatrial node pacemaker cell

Cardiovascular function is regulated by the rhythmicity of circadian, infradian and ultradian clocks. Specific time scales of different cell types drive their functions: circadian gene regulation at hours scale, activation-inactivation cycles of ion channels at millisecond scales, the heart''s beating rate at hundreds of millisecond scales, and low frequency autonomic signaling at cycles of tens of seconds. Heart rate and rhythm are modulated by a hierarchical clock system: autonomic signaling from the brain releases neurotransmitters from the vagus and sympathetic nerves to the heart’s pacemaker cells and activate receptors on the cell. These receptors activating ultradian clock functions embedded within pacemaker cells include sarcoplasmic reticulum rhythmic spontaneous Ca²⁺ cycling, rhythmic ion channel current activation and inactivation, and rhythmic oscillatory mitochondria ATP production. Here we summarize the evidence that intrinsic pacemaker cell mechanisms are the end effector of the hierarchical brain-heart circadian clock system. [BMB Reports 2015; 48(12): 677-684]     

Temporal dynamics of late-night photic stimulation of the human circadian timing system

The light-dark cycle is the primary synchronizing factor that keeps the internal circadian pacemaker appropriately aligned with the environmental 24-h day. Although it is known that ocular light exposure can effectively shift the human circadian pacemaker and do so in an intensity-dependent manner, the curve that describes the relationship between light intensity and pacemaker response has not been fully characterized for light exposure in the late biological night. We exposed subjects to 3 consecutive days of 5 h of experimental light, centered 1.5 h after the timing of the fitted minimum of core body temperature, and show that such light can phase advance shift the human circadian pacemaker in an intensity-dependent manner, with a logistic model best describing the relationship between light intensity and phase shift. A similar sigmoidal relationship is also observed between light intensity and the suppression of plasma melatonin concentrations that occurs during the experimental light exposure. As with a simpler, 1-day light exposure during the early biological night, our data indicate that the human circadian pacemaker is highly sensitive even to typical room light intensities during the late biological night, with approximately 100 lux evoking half of the effects observed with light 10 times as bright.     

Circadian regulation of phospholipid metabolism in retinal photoreceptors and ganglion cells

The neural retina is a key component of the vertebrate circadian system that is responsible for synchronizing the central circadian pacemaker to external light-dark (LD) cycles. The retina is itself rhythmic, showing circadian cycles in melatonin levels and gene expression. We assessed the in vivo incorporation of 32P-phosphate and 3H-glycerol into phospholipids of photoreceptor cells (PRCs) and retina ganglion cells (GCs) from chicks in constant illumination conditions (dark: DD or light: LL) over a 24-h period. Our findings showed that in DD there was a daily oscillation in 32P-labeling of total phospholipids synthesized in GCs and axonally transported to the brain. This metabolic fluctuation peaked during the subjective night (zeitgeber time [ZT] 20), persisted for several hours well into the subjective day and declined at subjective dusk (ZT 10-12). PRCs also exhibited an in vivo rhythm of 32P-phospholipid synthesis in DD. This rhythm peaked around ZT 22, continued a few hours into the day and declined by the end of subjective dusk. The major individual species labeled 1 h after 32P administration was phosphatidylinositol (PI) in both PRCs and GCs. Rhythmic phospholipid biosynthesis was also observed in DD after 3H-glycerol administration, with levels in GCs elevated from midday to early night. PRCs exhibited a similar rhythmic profile with the lowest levels of labeling during midnight. Phosphatidylcholine (PC) accounted for the individual species with the highest ratio of 3H-glycerol incorporation in both cell populations at all phases examined. By contrast, in LL the rhythm of 3H-glycerol labeling of phospholipids damped out in both cell layers. Our findings support the idea that, in constant darkness, the metabolism of retinal phospholipids, including their de novo biosynthesis, is regulated by an endogenous circadian clock.     

Mammalian cultured cells as a model system of peripheral circadian clocks

The mammalian circadian system consists of multiple oscillators with basically hierarchical relationship, in which the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) is the master pacemaker and the other oscillators in the periphery are subordinate. Although peripheral oscillators have been preceded by the SCN in circadian studies, accumulating data have revealed the importance and characteristics of peripheral oscillators. Cultured cell lines have also provided valuable information about intracellular mechanisms of circadian rhythms. This review outlines the properties of peripheral clocks in several perspectives such as the mechanisms of autonomous oscillations, the clock resetting, and the clock outputs, and describes the usefulness of immortalized cultured cells as a model system of mammalian circadian clocks by introducing some fruits of related works.     

Membrane electrical excitability is necessary for the free‐running larval Drosophila circadian clock

Drosophila larvae and adult pacemaker neurons both express free‐running oscillations of period (PER) and timeless (TIM) proteins that constitute the core of the cell‐autonomous circadian molecular clock. Despite similarities between the adult and larval molecular oscillators, adults and larvae differ substantially in the complexity and organization of their pacemaker neural circuits, as well as in behavioral manifestations of circadian rhythmicity. We have shown previously that electrical silencing of adult Drosophila circadian pacemaker neurons through targeted expression of either an open rectifier or inward rectifier K⁺ channel stops the free‐running oscillations of the circadian molecular clock. This indicates that neuronal electrical activity in the pacemaker neurons is essential to the normal function of the adult intracellular clock. In the current study, we show that in constant darkness the free‐running larval pacemaker clock—like that of the adult pacemaker neurons they give rise to—requires membrane electrical activity to oscillate. In contrast to the free‐running clock, the molecular clock of electrically silenced larval pacemaker neurons continues to oscillate in diurnal (light–dark) conditions. This specific disruption of the free‐running clock caused by targeted K⁺ channel expression likely reflects a specific cell‐autonomous clock‐membrane feedback loop that is common to both larval and adult neurons, and is not due to blocking pacemaker synaptic outputs or disruption of pacemaker neuronal morphology. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Neurobiol, 2005     

Repeated assessment of the endogenous 24-hour profile of blood pressure under constant routine

The impact of environmental and behavioral factors on the 24-h profile of blood pressure (BP) has been well established. Various attempts have been made to control these exogenous factors, in order to investigate a possible endogenous circadian variation of BP. Recently, we reported the results of the first environmentally and behaviorally controlled laboratory study with 24-h recordings of BP and heart rate (HR) during maintained wakefulness. In this constant-routine study, a pronounced endogenous circadian rhythm of HR was found, but circadian variation of BP was absent. This result suggested that the circadian rhythm of BP observed in earlier controlled studies, with sleep allowed, was evoked by the sleep-wake cycle as opposed to the endogenous circadian pacemaker. In order to verify our previous finding during maintained wakefulness, we repeated the experiment five times with six normotensive, healthy young subjects. Statistical analyses of the hourly measurements of BP and HR confirmed the replicable presence of an endogenous circadian rhythm of HR, as well as the consistent absence of an endogenous circadian variation of BP. Thus, this study provided additional evidence that the 24-h profile of BP—as observed under normal circumstances—is the sole result of environmental and behavioral factors such as the occurrence of sleep, and has no endogenous circadian component. (Chronobiology International, 18(1), 85-98, 2001)     

Entrainment of circadian clocks in mammals by arousal and food

Circadian rhythms in mammals are regulated by a system of endogenous circadian oscillators (clock cells) in the brain and in most peripheral organs and tissues. One group of clock cells in the hypothalamic SCN (suprachiasmatic nuclei) functions as a pacemaker for co-ordinating the timing of oscillators elsewhere in the brain and body. This master clock can be reset and entrained by daily LD (light-dark) cycles and thereby also serves to interface internal with external time, ensuring an appropriate alignment of behavioural and physiological rhythms with the solar day. Two features of the mammalian circadian system provide flexibility in circadian programming to exploit temporal regularities of social stimuli or food availability. One feature is the sensitivity of the SCN pacemaker to behavioural arousal stimulated during the usual sleep period, which can reset its phase and modulate its response to LD stimuli. Neural pathways from the brainstem and thalamus mediate these effects by releasing neurochemicals that inhibit retinal inputs to the SCN clock or that alter clock-gene expression in SCN clock cells. A second feature is the sensitivity of circadian oscillators outside of the SCN to stimuli associated with food intake, which enables animals to uncouple rhythms of behaviour and physiology from LD cycles and align these with predictable daily mealtimes. The location of oscillators necessary for food-entrained behavioural rhythms is not yet certain. Persistence of these rhythms in mice with clock-gene mutations that disable the SCN pacemaker suggests diversity in the molecular basis of light- and food-entrainable clocks.     

Functional independence of circadian clocks that regulate plant gene expression

BACKGROUND: Circadian clocks regulate the gene expression, metabolism and behaviour of most eukaryotes, controlling an orderly succession of physiological processes that are synchronised with the environmental day/night cycle. Central circadian pacemakers that control animal behaviour are located in the brains of insects and rodents, but the location of such a pacemaker has not been determined in plants. Peripheral plant and animal tissues also maintain circadian rhythms when isolated in culture, indicating that these tissues contain circadian clocks. The degree of autonomy that the multiple, peripheral circadian clocks have in the intact organism is unclear. RESULTS: We used the bioluminescent luciferase reporter gene to monitor rhythmic expression from three promoters in transgenic Arabidopsis and tobacco plants. The rhythmic expression of a single gene could be set at up to three phases in different anatomical locations of a single plant, by applying light/dark treatments to restricted tissue areas. The initial phases were stably maintained after the entraining treatments ended, indicating that the circadian oscillators in intact plants are autonomous. This result held for all the vegetative plant organs and for promoters expressed in all major cell types. The rhythms of one organ were unaffected by entrainment of the rest of the plant, indicating that phase-resetting signals are also autonomous. CONCLUSIONS: Higher plants contain a spatial array of autonomous circadian clocks that regulate gene expression without a localised pacemaker. Circadian timing in plants might be less accurate but more flexible than the vertebrate circadian system.