Loss of dexras1 alters nonphotic circadian phase shifts and reveals a role for the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) in gene-targeted mice

Loss of Dexras1 in gene-targeted mice impairs circadian entrainment to light cycles and produces complex changes to phase-dependent resetting responses (phase shifts) to light. The authors now describe greatly enhanced and phase-specific nonphotic responses induced by arousal in dexras1(-/-) mice. In constant conditions, mutant mice exhibited significant arousal-induced phase shifts throughout the subjective day. Unusual phase advances in the late subjective night were also produced when arousal has little effect in mice. Bilateral lesions of the intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) completely eliminated both the nonphotic as well as the light-induced phase shifts of circadian locomotor rhythms during the subjective day, but had no effect on nighttime phase shifts. The expression of FOS-like protein in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) was not affected by either photic or nonphotic stimulation in the subjective day in either genotype. Therefore, the loss of Dexras1 (1) enhances nonphotic phase shifts in a phase-dependent manner, and (2) demonstrates that the IGL in mice is a primary mediator of circadian phase-resetting responses to both photic and nonphotic events during the subjective day, but plays a different functional role in the subjective night. Furthermore, (3) the change in FOS level does not appear to be a critical step in the entrainment pathways for either light or arousal during the subjective day. The cumulative evidence suggests that Dexras1 regulates multiple photic and nonphotic signal-transduction pathways, thereby playing an essential role modulating species-specific characteristics of circadian entrainment.     

Dexras1 potentiates photic and suppresses nonphotic responses of the circadian clock

Circadian rhythms of physiology and behavior are generated by biological clocks that are synchronized to the cyclic environment by photic or nonphotic cues. The interactions and integration of various entrainment pathways to the clock are poorly understood. Here, we show that the Ras-like G protein Dexras1 is a critical modulator of the responsiveness of the master clock to photic and nonphotic inputs. Genetic deletion of Dexras1 reduces photic entrainment by eliminating a pertussis-sensitive circadian response to NMDA. Mechanistically, Dexras1 couples NMDA and light input to Gi/o and ERK activation. In addition, the mutation greatly potentiates nonphotic responses to neuropeptide Y and unmasks a nonphotic response to arousal. Thus, Dexras1 modulates the responses of the master clock to photic and nonphotic stimuli in opposite directions. These results identify a signaling molecule that serves as a differential modulator of the gated photic and nonphotic input pathways to the circadian timekeeping system.     

Nonphotic entrainment in a diurnal mammal, the European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus).

Entrainment by nonphotic, activity-inducing stimuli has been investigated in detail in nocturnal rodents, but little is known about nonphotic entrainment in diurnal animals. Comparative studies would offer the opportunity to distinguish between two possibilities. (1) If nonphotic phase shifts depend on the phase of the activity cycle, the phase response curve (PRC) should be about 180 degrees out of phase in nocturnal and diurnal mammals. (2) If nonphotic phase shifts depend on the phase of the pacemaker, the two PRCs should be in phase. We used the diurnal European ground squirrel (Spermophilus citellus) in a nonphotic entrainment experiment to distinguish between the two possibilities. Ten European ground squirrels were kept under dim red light (<1 lux) and 20 +/- 1 degrees C. During the entrainment phase of the experiment, the animals were confined every 23.5 h (T) to a running wheel for 3 h. The circadian rhythms of 6 squirrels entrained, 2 continued to free run, and 2 possibly entrained but displayed arrhythmicity during the experiment. In a second experiment, a photic pulse was used in a similar protocol. Five out of 9 squirrels entrained, 1 did not entrain, and 3 yielded ambiguous results. During stable entrainment, the phase-advancing nonphotic pulses coincided with the end of the subjective day, while phase-advancing light pulses coincided with the start of the subjective day: mean psi(nonphotic) = 11.4 h; mean psi(photic) = 0.9 h (psi defined as the difference between the onset of activity and the start of the pulse). The data for nonphotic entrainment correspond well with those from similar experiments with nocturnal Syrian hamsters where psi(nonphotic) varied from 8.09 to 11.34 h. This indicates that the circadian phase response to a nonphotic activity-inducing stimulus depends on the phase of the pacemaker rather than on the phase of the activity cycle.     

Resetting the clock: Dexras1 defines a path

The signaling pathways by which light and activity shift the circadian clock are not well understood. In this issue of Neuron, Cheng et al. analyze mice lacking Dexras1 (a Ras family GTPase protein) and demonstrate an important role for G(i/o) signaling mediating both photic and nonphotic phase shifts of the circadian clock.     

Photic and nonphotic inputs to the diurnal circadian clock

Diurnal animals occupy a different temporal niche from nocturnal animals and are consequently exposed to different amounts of light as well as different dangers. Accordingly, some variation exists in the way that diurnal animals synchronize their internal circadian clock to match the external 24-hour daily cycle. First, though the brain mechanisms underlying photic entrainment are very similar among species with different daily activity patterns, there is evidence that diurnal animals are less sensitive to photic stimuli compared to nocturnal animals. Second, stimuli other than light that synchronize rhythms (i.e. nonphotic stimuli) can also entrain and phase shift daily rhythms. Some of the rules that govern nonphotic entrainment in nocturnal animals as well as the brain mechanisms that control nonphotic influences on rhythms do not appear to apply to diurnal animals, however. Some evidence supports the idea that arousal or activity plays an important role in entraining rhythms in diurnal animals, either during the light (active) or dark (inactive) phases, though no consistent pattern is seen. GABAergic stimulation induces phase shifts during the subjective day in both diurnal and nocturnal animals. In diurnal Arvicanthis niloticus (Nile grass rats), SCN GABA_A receptor activation at this time results in phase delays while in nocturnal animals phase advances are induced. It appears that the effect of GABA at this circadian phase results from the inhibition of period gene expression in both diurnal and nocturnal animals. Nonetheless, the resulting phase shifts are in opposite directions. It is not known what stimuli or behaviours ultimately induce changes in GABA activity in the SCN that result in alterations of circadian phase in diurnal grass rats. Taken together, studies such as these suggest that it may be problematic to apply the principles governing nocturnal nonphotic entrainment and its underlying mechanisms to diurnal species including humans.     

Memory for Time of Day (Time Memory) Is Encoded by a Circadian Oscillator and Is Distinct From Other Context Memories

We report that the neural representation of the time of day (time memory) in golden hamsters involves the setting of a 24-h oscillator that is functionally and anatomically distinct from the circadian clock in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), but is entrained by the SCN acting as a weak zeitgeber. In hamsters, peak conditioned place avoidance (CPA) was expressed only near the time of day of the learning experience (±2?h) for the first days after conditioning. On a 14:10 light:dark cycle, with conditioning at the end of the light period (zeitgeber time 11 [ZT11]), CPA behavior, including time of day memory, was retained for more than 18 d. With conditioning in the early day (zeitgeber time 03 [ZT03]), CPA was completely lost after 5 d but reemerged after an additional 6 d, with the peak avoidance time shifted to ZT11. When the entraining light cycle was shifted immediately following learning at either ZT11 or ZT03, with no additional experience in the training apparatus, peak CPA 18 d later was always found at ZT11 on the shifted light cycles. When conditioned at ZT03, then placed into constant dark for 18 cycles, the peak shifted to subjective circadian time 11 (CT11). In all experiments, the peak CPA time was set initially to the time of experience, and was reset subsequently to the end of the subjective day, without memory loss for other context associations. In the absence of an SCN, peak avoidance was not reset. Therefore, time memory is distinct from other context memories, and involves the setting of a non-SCN circadian oscillator. We suggest that circadian oscillators underlying time memory work in concert with the SCN to enable anticipation of critical conditions according to both immediate- and long-term probabilities of where and when important conditions could be encountered again. (Author correspondence: ralph@psych.utoronto.ca)     

CONES ARE REQUIRED FOR NORMAL TEMPORAL RESPONSES TO LIGHT OF PHASE SHIFTS AND CLOCK GENE EXPRESSION

In mammals, non-visual responses to light involve intrinsically photosensitive melanopsin-expressing retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) that receive synaptic inputs from rod and cone photoreceptors. Several studies have shown that cones also play a role in light entrainment, photic responses of the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), pupil constriction, and sleep induction. These studies suggest that cones are mainly involved in the initial response to light, whereas melanopsin provides a sustained input for non-visual responses during continued light exposure. Based on this idea, we explored the effects of the absence of middle-wavelength (MW)-cones on the temporal responses of circadian behavior and clock gene expression in light. In mice lacking MW-cones, our results show a reduction in behavioral phase shifts in response to light stimulations of short duration at 480 and 530?nm, but no alteration for short-wavelength (360-nm) light exposures. Similarly, induction of the period gene mPer1 and mPer2 mRNAs in the SCN are attenuated in response to light exposures of mid to long wavelengths. Modeling of the photoresponses shows that mice lacking MW-cones have an overall reduction in sensitivity that increases with longer wavelengths. The differences in photic responsiveness are consistent with the idea that cones provide a strong initial phasic input to the circadian system at light-onset and may confer a priming effect on ipRGC responses to sub-threshold light exposures. In summary, the contribution of MW-cones is essential for the normal expression of phase shifts and clock gene induction by light in mammals. (Author correspondence: ouria.benyahya@inserm.fr)     

Photic and nonphotic circadian phase resetting in a diurnal primate, the common marmoset

Despite the considerable literature on circadian entrainment, there is little information on this subject in diurnal mammals. Contributing to this lack of understanding is the problem of separating photic from nonphotic (behavioral) phase-resetting events in diurnal species. In the present study, photic phase resetting was obtained in diurnal common marmosets held under constant dim light (DimDim; <0.5 lx) by using a 20-s pulse of bright light to minimize time available for behavioral arousal. This stimulus elicited phase advances at circadian time (CT) 18-22 and phase delays at CT9-12. Daily presentation of these 20-s pulses produced entrainment with a phase angle of approximately 11 h (0 h = activity onset). Nonphotic phase resetting was obtained under DimDim with the use of a 1-h-induced activity pulse, consisting of intermittent cage agitation and water sprinkling, delivered in total darkness to minimize photic effects. This stimulus caused phase delays at CT20-24, and entrainment to a scheduled daily regimen of these pulses occurred with a phase angle of approximately 0 h. These results indicate that photic and nonphotic phase-response curves (PRCs) of marmosets are similar to those of nocturnal rodents and that nonphotic PRCs are keyed to the phase of the suprachiasmatic nucleus pacemaker, not to the phase of the activity-rest cycle.     

Behavioral inhibition of circadian responses to light.

Circadian locomotor rhythms in rodents may be synchronized by either photic or nonphotic events that produce phase shifts of the rhythm. Little is known, however, about how these two types of stimuli interact to produce entrainment. The well-characterized circadian photic response of the golden hamster was examined in situations where a short light pulse and locomotor activity, a nonphotic event, occurred simultaneously. Light-induced phase advances were attenuated when animals were active during light exposure. The results show that circadian responses to light depend upon the environmental situation in which the light is given, and call into question the implicit assumption in circadian rhythm research that phase shifting and entrainment to light-dark cycles depend simply on photic activation of well-known retinofugal pathways. Moreover, since light therapy is becoming an important component in the treatment of circadian-based disorders in humans, the results emphasize the need for evaluation of the behavioral aspects of light therapy protocols.     

Species Differences Between Hamsters and Rats with Regard to the Putative Role of Serotonin in the Circadian System

In mammals, circadian rhythms of locomotor activity and many other behavioral and physiological functions are controlled by an endogenous pacemaker located in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Among various other afferents, the SCN receives a dense serotonergic input from the mesencephalic raphe complex. Experimental evidence obtained so far in Syrian hamsters suggests that serotonin (5-HT) mimics the effect of nonphotic stimuli during subjective day and modulates photic input to the SCN during subjective night. These findings are consistent with a putative role of serotonergic pathways in the transmission of the state of arousal to the SCN. In this paper, we review recent evidence for different modes of 5-HT action and/or the involvement of different 5-HT receptor subtypes in hamsters and rats. In intact rats, 5-HT agonists induce photic-like phase shifts of locomotor activity and melatonin rhythms as well as c-Fos expression in the ventral SCN. These results suggest a role for 5-HT in the transmission of photic rather than nonphotic information to the rat SCN. Such a function of 5-HT would also explain why the circadian system of rats is less sensitive or even insensitive to nonphotic stimuli.     

Species Differences Between Hamsters and Rats with Regard to the Putative Role of Serotonin in the Circadian System

In mammals, circadian rhythms of locomotor activity and many other behavioral and physiological functions are controlled by an endogenous pacemaker located in the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Among various other afferents, the SCN receives a dense serotonergic input from the mesencephalic raphe complex. Experimental evidence obtained so far in Syrian hamsters suggests that serotonin (5-HT) mimics the effect of nonphotic stimuli during subjective day and modulates photic input to the SCN during subjective night. These findings are consistent with a putative role of serotonergic pathways in the transmission of the state of arousal to the SCN. In this paper, we review recent evidence for different modes of 5-HT action and/or the involvement of different 5-HT receptor subtypes in hamsters and rats. In intact rats, 5-HT agonists induce photic-like phase shifts of locomotor activity and melatonin rhythms as well as c-Fos expression in the ventral SCN. These results suggest a role for 5-HT in the transmission of photic rather than nonphotic information to the rat SCN. Such a function of 5-HT would also explain why the circadian system of rats is less sensitive or even insensitive to nonphotic stimuli.     

Differential responses of circadian activity onset and offset following GABA-ergic and opioid receptor activation

The circadian pacemaker in the mammalian suprachiasmatic nuclei is responsive to photic and nonphotic stimuli. In the present study, the authors have investigated the response of activity onset and offset to application of nonphotic stimuli: the benzodiazepine midazolam and the opioid receptor agonist fentanyl. In correspondence with previous studies, both stimuli induced phase advances of the activity onset when given in the mid- to late subjective day. In contrast, activity offset did not phase advance following these injections. Injections during the early subjective day induced small phase delays of the activity onset, while large phase delays occurred in activity offset. Phase shifts, induced at both circadian time zones, were paralleled by an increase in the length of daily activity (alpha). The increase in a remained present during several days after the injection. The different kinetics in phase shifting of the activity onset and offset indicate complexity in phase-shifting behavior of the circadian pacemaker in response to nonphotic stimuli. Moreover, the data show responsiveness of the circadian system to GABA-ergic and opioid receptor activation, not only during the mid- to late subjective day but also during the early subjective day. The data implicate that the early subjective day is an interesting phase for analysis of molecular and biochemical processes involved in nonphotic phase shifting.     

Response of the mouse circadian system to serotonin 1A/2/7 agonists in vivo: surprisingly little

Serotonin (5-HT) is thought to play a role in regulating nonphotic phase shifts and modulating photic phase shifts of the mammalian circadian system, but results with different species (rats vs. hamsters) and techniques (in vivo vs. in vitro; systemic vs. intracerebral drug delivery) have been discordant. Here we examined the effects of the 5-HT1A/7 agonist 8-OH-DPAT and the 5-HT1/2 agonist quipazine on the circadian system in mice, with some parallel experiments conducted with hamsters for comparative purposes. In mice, neither drug, delivered systemically at a range of circadian phases and doses, induced phase shifts significantly different from vehicle injections. In hamsters, quipazine intraperitoneally (i.p.) did not induce phase shifts, whereas 8-OH-DPAT induced phase shifts after i.p. but not intra-SCN injections. In mice, quipazine modestly increased c-Fos expression in the SCN (site of the circadian pacemaker) during the subjective day, whereas 8-OH-DPAT did not affect SCN c-Fos. In hamsters, both drugs suppressed SCN c-Fos in the subjective day. In both species, both drugs strongly induced c-Fos in the paraventricular nucleus (within-subject positive control). 8-OH-DPAT did not significantly attenuate light-induced phase shifts in mice but did in hamsters (between-species positive control). These results indicate that in the intact mouse in vivo, acute activation of 5-HT1A/2/7 receptors in the circadian system is not sufficient to reset the SCN pacemaker or to oppose phase-shifting effects of light. There appear to be significant species differences in the susceptibility of the circadian system to modulation by systemically delivered serotonergics.     

Phase and period responses to short light pulses in a wild diurnal rodent,Funambulus pennanti

Photic phase response curves (PRCs) have been extensively studied in many laboratory-bred diurnal and nocturnal rodents. However, comparatively fewer studies have addressed the effects of photic cues on wild diurnal mammals. Hence, we studied the effects of short durations of light pulses on the circadian systems of the diurnal Indian Palm squirrel, Funambulus pennanti. Adult males entrained to a light–dark cycle (12?h–12?h) were transferred to constant darkness (DD). Free-running animals were exposed to brief light pulses (250 lux) of 15?min, 3 circadian hours (CT) apart (CT 0, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18 and 21). Phase shifts evoked at different phases were plotted against CT and a PRC was constructed. F. pennanti exhibited phase-dependent phase shifts at all the CTs studied, and the PRC obtained was of type 1 at the intensity of light used. Phase advances were evoked during the early subjective day and late subjective night, while phase delays occurred during the late subjective day and early subjective night, with maximum phase delay at CT 15 (?2.04?±?0.23?h), and maximum phase advance at CT 21 (1.88?±?0.31?h). No dead zone was seen at this resolution. The free-running period of the rhythm was concurrently lengthened (deceleration) during the late subjective day and early subjective night, while period shortening (acceleration) occurred during the late subjective night. The maximum deceleration was noticed at CT 15 (?0.40?±?0.09?h) and the maximum acceleration at CT 21 (0.39?±?0.07?h). A significant positive correlation exists between the phase shifts and the period changes (r?=?0.684, p?=?0.001). The shapes of both the PRC and period response curve (τRC) qualitatively resemble each other. This suggests that the palm squirrel’s circadian system is entrained both by phase and period responses to light. Thus, F. pennanti exhibits robust clock-resetting in response to light pulses.     

Social influences on mammalian circadian rhythms: animal and human studies

While light is considered the dominant stimulus for entraining (synchronizing) mammalian circadian rhythms to local environmental time, social stimuli are also widely cited as 'zeitgebers' (time-cues). This review critically assesses the evidence for social influences on mammalian circadian rhythms, and possible mechanisms of action. Social stimuli may affect circadian behavioural programmes by regulating the phase and period of circadian clocks (i.e. a zeitgeber action, either direct or by conditioning to photic zeitgebers), by influencing daily patterns of light exposure or modulating light input to the clock, or by associative learning processes that utilize circadian time as a discriminative or conditioned stimulus. There is good evidence that social stimuli can act as zeitgebers. In several species maternal signals are the primary zeitgeber in utero and prior to weaning. Adults of some species can also be phase shifted or entrained by single or periodic social interactions, but these effects are often weak, and appear to be mediated by social stimulation of arousal. There is no strong evidence yet for sensory-specific nonphotic inputs to the clock. The circadian phase-dependence of clock resetting to social stimuli or arousal (the 'nonphotic' phase response curve, PRC), where known, is distinct from that to light and similar in diurnal and nocturnal animals. There is some evidence that induction of arousal can modulate light input to the clock, but no studies yet of whether social stimuli can shift the clock by conditioning to photic cues, or be incorporated into the circadian programme by associative learning. In humans, social zeitgebers appear weak by comparison with light. In temporal isolation or under weak light-dark cycles, humans may ignore social cues and free-run independently, although cases of mutual synchrony among two or more group-housed individuals have been reported. Social cues may affect circadian timing by controlling sleep-wake states, but the phase of entrainment observed to fixed sleep-wake schedules in dim light is consistent with photic mediation (scheduled variations in behavioural state necessarily create daily light-dark cycles unless subjects are housed in constant dark or have no eyes). By contrast, discrete exercise sessions can induce phase shifts consistent with the nonphotic PRC observed in animal studies. The best evidence for social entrainment in humans is from a few totally blind subjects who synchronize to the 24 h day, or to near-24 h sleep-wake schedules under laboratory conditions. However, the critical entraining stimuli have not yet been identified, and there are no reported cases yet of social entrainment in bilaterally enucleated blind subjects. The role of social zeitgebers in mammalian behavioural ecology, their mechanisms of action, and their utility for manipulating circadian rhythms in humans, remains to be more fully elaborated.     

High potassium treatment resets the circadian oscillator in Xenopus retinal photoreceptors

In vertebrate retina, light hyperpolarizes the photoreceptor membrane, and this is an essential cellular signal for vision. Cellular signals responsible for photic entrainment of some circadian oscillators appear to be distinct from those for vision, but it is not known whether changes in photoreceptor membrane potential play roles in photic entrainment of the photoreceptor circadian oscillator. The authors show that a depolarizing exposure to high potassium resets the circadian oscillator in cultured Xenopus retinal photoreceptor layers. A 4-h pulse of high [K(+)] (34 mM higher than in normal culture medium) caused phase shifts of the melatonin rhythm. This treatment caused phase delays during the early subjective day and phase advances during the late subjective day. In addition to the phase-shifting effect, high potassium pulses stimulated melatonin release acutely at all times. High [K(+)] therefore mimicked dark in its effects on oscillator phase and melatonin synthesis. These results suggest that membrane potential may play a role in photic entrainment of the photoreceptor circadian oscillator and in regulation of melatonin release.     

Effects of food deprivation on locomotor activity, plasma glucose, and circadian clock resetting in Syrian hamsters

Circadian rhythms in Syrian hamsters can be phase advanced by activity or arousal stimulated during the daily rest phase ("subjective day"). A widely used method for stimulating activity is confinement to a novel wheel. Some hamsters decline to run, and some procedures may reduce the probability of running. The authors evaluated food deprivation (FD) as a method to promote running. Given evidence that perturbations of cell metabolism or glucose availability may affect circadian clock function in some tissues or species, they also assessed the effects of FD on free-running circadian phase, resetting responses to photic and nonphotic stimuli and plasma glucose. In constant light, a 27-h fast significantly increased running in a novel wheel and marginally increased the average size of resulting phase shifts. FD, without novel wheel confinement, was associated with some very large phase shifts or disruption of rhythmicity in hamsters that spontaneously ran in their home wheels during the subjective day. Hamsters that ran only during the usual active phase (subjective night) or that were prevented from running did not exhibit phase shifts, despite refeeding in the mid-subjective day. Using an Aschoff Type II design for measuring shifts, a 27-h fast significantly increased the number of hamsters that ran continuously when confined to a novel wheel but did not affect the dose-response relation between the amount of running and the size of the resulting shift. A day of fasting also did not affect the size of phase delay or advance shifts to 30-min light pulses in the subjective night. Plasma glucose was markedly reduced by wheel running in combination with fasting but was increased by running in nonfasted hamsters. These results establish FD as a useful tool for stimulating activity in home cage or novel wheels and indicate that in Syrian hamsters, significant alterations in glucose availability, associated with running, fasting, and refeeding, have surprisingly little effect on circadian pacemaker function.     

Cocaine modulates pathways for photic and nonphotic entrainment of the mammalian SCN circadian clock

Cocaine abuse is highly disruptive to circadian physiological and behavioral rhythms. The present study was undertaken to determine whether such effects are manifest through actions on critical photic and nonphotic regulatory pathways in the master circadian clock of the mouse suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN). Impairment of SCN photic signaling by systemic (intraperitoneal) cocaine injection was evidenced by strong (60%) attenuation of light-induced phase-delay shifts of circadian locomotor activity during the early night. A nonphotic action of cocaine was apparent from its induction of 1-h circadian phase-advance shifts at midday. The serotonin receptor antagonist, metergoline, blocked shifting by 80%, implicating a serotonergic mechanism. Reverse microdialysis perfusion of the SCN with cocaine at midday induced 3.7 h phase-advance shifts. Control perfusions with lidocaine and artificial cerebrospinal fluid had little shifting effect. In complementary in vitro experiments, photic-like phase-delay shifts of the SCN circadian neuronal activity rhythm induced by glutamate application to the SCN were completely blocked by cocaine. Cocaine treatment of SCN slices alone at subjective midday, but not the subjective night, induced 3-h phase-advance shifts. Lidocaine had no shifting effect. Cocaine-induced phase shifts were completely blocked by metergoline, but not by the dopamine receptor antagonist, fluphenazine. Finally, pretreatment of SCN slices for 2 h with a low concentration of serotonin agonist (to block subsequent serotonergic phase resetting) abolished cocaine-induced phase shifts at subjective midday. These results reveal multiple effects of cocaine on adult circadian clock regulation that are registered within the SCN and involve enhanced serotonergic transmission.     

Dexras1: shaping the responsiveness of the circadian clock

Living organisms are endowed with an autonomous timekeeping program that not only maintains circadian rhythms of behaviour and physiology but is reset by cues from the external, cyclic environment. Intracellular signaling events that mediate entrainment of the mammalian circadian clock by photic (light) as well as non-photic inputs are only beginning to be elucidated. Dexras1 is a novel Ras-like G protein that modulates multiple signaling cascades. Genetic ablation of Dexras1 in mice (dexras1(-/-)) results in altered responsiveness of the master circadian clock to photic and non-photic cues. This review will attempt to provide mechanistic insights into the involvement of Dexras1 in biological timing processes based on its role as a modulator of signal transduction.