Identification of specific amino acid residues in the E. coli beta processivity clamp involved in interactions with DNA polymerase III, UmuD and UmuD'

Variants of a pentapeptide sequence (QL[S/F]LF), referred to as the eubacterial clamp-binding motif, appear to be required for certain proteins to bind specifically to the Escherichia coli beta sliding clamp, apparently by making contact with a hydrophobic pocket located at the base of the C-terminal tail of each beta protomer. Although both UmuC (DNA pol V) and the alpha catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase III (pol III) each bear a reasonable match to this motif, which appears to be required for their respective interactions with the clamp, neither UmuD not UmuD' do. As part of an ongoing effort to understand how interactions involving the different E. coli umuDC gene products and components of DNA polymerase III help to coordinate DNA replication with a DNA damage checkpoint control and translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) following DNA damage, we characterized the surfaces on beta important for its interactions with the two forms of the umuD gene product. We also characterized the surface of beta important for its interaction with the alpha catalytic subunit of pol III. Our results indicate that although UmuD, UmuD' and alpha share some common contacts with beta, each also makes unique contacts with the clamp. These findings suggest that differential interactions of UmuD and UmuD' with beta impose a DNA damage-responsive conditionality on how beta interacts with the translesion DNA polymerase UmuC. This is formally analogous to how post-translational modification of the eukaryotic PCNA clamp influences mutagenesis. We discuss the implications of our findings in terms of how E. coli might coordinate the actions of the umuDC gene products with those of pol III, as well as for how organisms in general might manage the actions of their multiple DNA polymerases.     

A model for the structure of the Escherichia coli SOS-regulated UmuD2 protein

The ubiquitous Y-family of DNA polymerases, exemplified by the Escherichia coli UmuC protein (the catalytic subunit of DNA Pol V), possess the remarkable ability to replicate imperfect DNA templates that cannot be replicated by other types of DNA polymerases. Since this ability comes at the cost of a reduced fidelity, it is important that organisms manage these unique polymerases to coordinate their actions with those of the replication machinery. In E. coli, it is becoming evident that a sophisticated series of protein-protein interactions involving the two forms of the umuD gene product, UmuD and UmuD' and components of the replicative DNA polymerase serve to manage the actions of the umuC-encoded DNA polymerase. The purpose of this study was to better understand how structural differences between UmuD2 and UmuD2' help to determine which biological role the umuDC gene products will play; the UmuD2C complex functions as a DNA damage checkpoint effector, while the UmuD2'C complex participates in translesion DNA synthesis, which serves as the mechanistic basis for most chemical and UV light mutagenesis. Based on the results of a combination of disulfide cross-linking experiments, measurements of solvent accessibility and electron paramagnetic spin resonance (EPR) studies, we have developed a refined model for the structure of the UmuD2 homodimer. In the model that we are proposing, the N-terminal arms of UmuD (residues 1-39) form an extended interface in the UmuD2 homodimer by folding down over the globular domains of their intradimer partners. As a result, significant portions of the surface of each globular domain are buried in the UmuD2 homodimer. Based on the structure of the UmuD2' homodimer, both in the crystal and in solution, these same surfaces are exposed. Implications of these structural differences between the UmuD2 and the UmuD2' homodimers with respect to their roles in managing the actions of the umuC-encoded DNA polymerase are discussed.     

Escherichia coli DNA polymerase V subunit exchange: a post-SOS mechanism to curtail error-prone DNA synthesis

DNA polymerase V consisting of a heterotrimer composed of one molecule of UmuC and two molecules of UmuD' (UmuD'2C) is responsible for SOS damage-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. Here we show that although the UmuD'2C complex remains intact through multiple chromatographic steps, excess UmuD, the precursor to UmuD', displaces UmuD' from UmuD'2C by forming a UmuDD' heterodimer, while UmuC concomitantly aggregates as an insoluble precipitate. Although soluble UmuD'2C is readily detected when the two genes are co-transcribed and translated in vitro, soluble UmuD2C or UmuDD'C are not detected. The subunit exchange between UmuD'2C and UmuD offers a biological means to inactivate error-prone polymerase V following translesion synthesis, thus preventing mutations from occurring on undamaged DNA.     

Selective disruption of the DNA polymerase III α-β complex by the umuD gene products

DNA polymerase III (DNA pol III) efficiently replicates the Escherichia coli genome, but it cannot bypass DNA damage. Instead, translesion synthesis (TLS) DNA polymerases are employed to replicate past damaged DNA; however, the exchange of replicative for TLS polymerases is not understood. The umuD gene products, which are up-regulated during the SOS response, were previously shown to bind to the α, β and ε subunits of DNA pol III. Full-length UmuD inhibits DNA replication and prevents mutagenic TLS, while the cleaved form UmuD' facilitates mutagenesis. We show that α possesses two UmuD binding sites: at the N-terminus (residues 1-280) and the C-terminus (residues 956-975). The C-terminal site favors UmuD over UmuD'. We also find that UmuD, but not UmuD', disrupts the α-β complex. We propose that the interaction between α and UmuD contributes to the transition between replicative and TLS polymerases by removing α from the β clamp.     

The mutagenesis protein UmuC is a DNA polymerase activated by UmuD', RecA, and SSB and is specialized for translesion replication.

Replication of DNA lesions leads to the formation of mutations. In Escherichia coli this process is regulated by the SOS stress response, and requires the mutagenesis proteins UmuC and UmuD'. Analysis of translesion replication using a recently reconstituted in vitro system (Reuven, N. B., Tomer, G., and Livneh, Z. (1998) Mol. Cell 2, 191-199) revealed that lesion bypass occurred with a UmuC fusion protein, UmuD', RecA, and SSB in the absence of added DNA polymerase. Further analysis revealed that UmuC was a DNA polymerase (E. coli DNA polymerase V), with a weak polymerizing activity. Upon addition of UmuD', RecA, and SSB, the UmuC DNA polymerase was greatly activated, and replicated a synthetic abasic site with great efficiency (45% bypass in 6 min), 10-100-fold higher than E. coli DNA polymerases I, II, or III holoenzyme. Analysis of bypass products revealed insertion of primarily dAMP (69%), and to a lesser degree dGMP (31%) opposite the abasic site. The UmuC104 mutant protein was defective both in lesion bypass and in DNA synthesis. These results indicate that UmuC is a UmuD'-, RecA-, and SSB-activated DNA polymerase, which is specialized for lesion bypass. UmuC is a member of a new family of DNA polymerases which are specialized for lesion bypass, and include the yeast RAD30 and the human XP-V genes, encoding DNA polymerase eta.     

Sloppier copier DNA polymerases involved in genome repair

When chromosomal replication is impeded in the presence of DNA damage, members of a newly discovered UmuC/DinB/Rev1/Rad30 superfamily of procaryotic and eucaryotic DNA polymerases catalyze translesion synthesis at blocked replication forks. Although these polymerases share sequence elements essentially unrelated to the standard replication and repair enzymes, some of them (such as the SOS-induced Escherichia coli pol V) catalyze 'error-prone' translesion synthesis leading to large increases in mutation, whereas others (an example being the Xeroderma pigmentosum variant gene product XPV pol eta) carry out aberrant, yet nonmutagenic translesion synthesis. Ongoing studies of these low fidelity polymerases could provide new insights into the mechanism of somatic hypermutation, a key element in the immune response.     

Evolution of the two-step model for UV-mutagenesis

It is quite remarkable how our understanding of translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) has changed so dramatically in the past 2 years. Until very recently, little was known about the molecular mechanisms of TLS in higher eukaryotes and what we did know, was largely based upon Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae model systems. The paradigm, proposed by Bryn Bridges and I [Mutat. Res. 150 (1985) 133] in 1985, was that error-prone TLS occurred in two steps; namely a misinsertion event opposite a lesion, followed by extension of the mispair so as to facilitate complete bypass of the lesion. The initial concept was that at least for E. coli, the misinsertion event was performed by the cell's main replicase, DNA polymerase III holoenzyme, and that elongation was achieved through the actions of specialized polymerase accessory proteins, such as UmuD and UmuC. Some 15 years later, we now know that this view is likely to be incorrect in that both misinsertion and bypass are performed by the Umu proteins (now called pol V). As pol V is normally a distributive enzyme, pol III may only be required to "fix" the misincorporation as a mutation by completing chromosome duplication. However, while the role of the E. coli proteins involved in TLS have changed, the initial concept of misincorporation followed by extension/bypass remains valid. Indeed, recent evidence suggests that it can equally be applied to TLS in eukaryotic cells where there are many more DNA polymerases to choose from. The aim of this review is, therefore, to provide a historical perspective to the "two-step" model for UV-mutagenesis, how it has recently evolved, and in particular, to highlight the seminal contributions made to it by Bryn Bridges.     

The biochemical requirements of DNA polymerase V-mediated translesion synthesis revisited

In addition to replicative DNA polymerases, cells contain specialized DNA polymerases involved in processes such as lesion tolerance, mutagenesis and immunoglobulin diversity. In Escherichia coli, DNA polymerase V (Pol V), encoded by the umuDC locus, is involved in translesion synthesis (TLS) and mutagenesis. Genetic studies have established that mutagenesis requires both UmuC and a proteolytic product of UmuD (UmuD'). In addition, RecA protein and the replication processivity factor, the beta-clamp, were genetically found to be essential co-factors for mutagenesis. Here, we have reconstituted Pol V-mediated bypass of three common replication-blocking lesions, namely the two major UV-induced lesions and a guanine adduct formed by a chemical carcinogen (G-AAF) under conditions that fulfil these in vivo requirements. Two co-factors are essential for efficient Pol V-mediated lesion bypass: (i) a DNA substrate onto which the beta-clamp is stably loaded; and (ii) an extended single-stranded RecA/ATP filament assembled downstream from the lesion site. For efficient bypass, Pol V needs to interact simultaneously with the beta-clamp and the 3' tip of the RecA filament. Formation of an extended RecA/ATP filament and stable loading of the beta-clamp are best achieved on long single-stranded circular DNA templates. In contrast to previously published data, the single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) is not absolutely required for Pol V-mediated lesion bypass provided ATP, instead of ATPgammaS, activates the RecA filament. Further discrepancies with the existing literature are explainable by the use of either inadequate DNA substrates or a UmuC fusion protein instead of native Pol V.     

DNA polymerases and SOS mutagenesis: can one reconcile the biochemical and genetic data?

Until recently, it had been concluded from genetic evidence that DNA polymerase III (Pol III, the main replicative polymerase in E. coli) was also responsible for mutagenic translesion synthesis on damaged templates, albeit under the influence of inducible proteins UmuD' and UmuC. Now it appears that these proteins themselves have polymerase activity (and are now known as Pol V) and can carry out translesion synthesis in vitro in the absence of Pol III. Here I discuss the apparent contradictions between genetics and biochemistry with regard to the role of Pol III in translesion synthesis. Does Pol V interact with Pol III and constitute an alternative component of the replication factory (replisome)? Where do the other three known polymerases fit in? What devices does the cell have to ensure that the "right" polymerase is used in a given situation? The debate about the role of Pol III in translesion synthesis reveals a deeper divide between models that interpret everything in terms of mass action effects and those that embrace a replisome held together by protein-protein interactions and located as a structural entity within the cell.     

Characterization of Escherichia coli UmuC active-site loops identifies variants that confer UV hypersensitivity

DNA is constantly exposed to chemical and environmental mutagens, causing lesions that can stall replication. In order to deal with DNA damage and other stresses, Escherichia coli utilizes the SOS response, which regulates the expression of at least 57 genes, including umuDC. The gene products of umuDC, UmuC and the cleaved form of UmuD, UmuD', form the specialized E. coli Y-family DNA polymerase UmuD'2C, or polymerase V (Pol V). Y-family DNA polymerases are characterized by their specialized ability to copy damaged DNA in a process known as translesion synthesis (TLS) and by their low fidelity on undamaged DNA templates. Y-family polymerases exhibit various specificities for different types of DNA damage. Pol V carries out TLS to bypass abasic sites and thymine-thymine dimers resulting from UV radiation. Using alanine-scanning mutagenesis, we probed the roles of two active-site loops composed of residues 31 to 38 and 50 to 54 in Pol V activity by assaying the function of single-alanine variants in UV-induced mutagenesis and for their ability to confer resistance to UV radiation. We find that mutations of the N-terminal residues of loop 1, N32, N33, and D34, confer hypersensitivity to UV radiation and to 4-nitroquinoline-N-oxide and significantly reduce Pol V-dependent UV-induced mutagenesis. Furthermore, mutating residues 32, 33, or 34 diminishes Pol V-dependent inhibition of recombination, suggesting that these mutations may disrupt an interaction of UmuC with RecA, which could also contribute to the UV hypersensitivity of cells expressing these variants.     

Specific in vivo protein-protein interactions between Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins.

One of the components of the RecA-LexA-controlled SOS response in Escherichia coli cells is an inducible error-prone DNA replication pathway that results in a substantial increase in the mutation rate. It is believed that error-prone DNA synthesis is performed by a multiprotein complex that is formed by UmuC, UmuD', RecA, and probably DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. It is postulated that the formation of such a complex requires specific interactions between these proteins. We have analyzed the specific protein-protein interactions between UmuC, UmuD, and UmuD' fusion proteins, using a Saccharomyces cerevisiae two-hybrid system. In agreement with previous in vitro data, we have shown that UmuD and UmuD' are able to form both homodimers (UmuD-UmuD and UmuD'-UmuD') and a heterodimer (UmuD-UmuD'). Our data show that UmuC fusion protein is capable of interacting exclusively with UmuD' and not with UmuD. Thus, posttranslational processing of UmuD into UmuD' is a critical step in SOS mutagenesis, enabling only the latter protein to interact with UmuC. Our data seem to indicate that the integrity of the entire UmuC sequence is essential for UmuC-UmuD' heterotypic interaction. Finally, in our studies, we used three different UmuC mutant proteins: UmuC25, UmuC36, and UmuC104. We have found that UmuC25 and UmuC36 are not capable of associating with UmuD'. In contrast, UmuC104 protein interacts with UmuD' protein with an efficiency identical to that of the wild-type protein. We postulate that UmuC104 protein might be defective in interaction with another, unknown protein essential for the SOS mutagenesis pathway.     

Lyase activities intrinsic to Escherichia coli polymerases IV and V

Escherichia coli DNA polymerase IV and V (pol IV and pol V) are error-prone DNA polymerases that are induced as part of the SOS regulon in response to DNA damage. Both are members of the Y-family of DNA polymerases. Their principal biological roles appear to involve translesion synthesis (TLS) and the generation of mutational diversity to cope with stress. Although neither enzyme is known to be involved in base excision repair (BER), we have nevertheless observed apurinic/apyrimidinic 5'-deoxyribose phosphate (AP/5'-dRP) lyase activities intrinsic to each polymerase. Pols IV and V catalyze cleavage of the phosphodiester backbone at the 3'-side of an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site as well as the removal of a 5'-deoxyribose phosphate (dRP) at a preincised AP site. The specific activities of the two error-prone polymerase-associated lyases are approximately 80-fold less than the associated lyase activity of human DNA polymerase beta, which is a key enzyme used in short patch BER. Pol IV forms a covalent Schiff's base intermediate with substrate DNA that is trapped by sodium borohydride, as proscribed by a beta-elimination mechanism. In contrast, a NaBH(4) trapped intermediate is not observed for pol V, even though the lyase specific activity of pol V is slightly higher than that of pol IV. Incubation of pol V (UmuD'(2)C) with a molar excess of UmuD drives an exchange of subunits to form UmuD'D+insoluble UmuC causing inactivation of polymerase and lyase activities. The concomitant loss of both activities is strong evidence that pol V contains a bona fide lyase activity.     

Crystal structure of a DinB lesion bypass DNA polymerase catalytic fragment reveals a classic polymerase catalytic domain.

The UmuC/DinB family of bypass polymerases is responsible for translesion DNA synthesis and includes the human polymerases eta, iota, and kappa. We determined the 2.3 A resolution crystal structure of a catalytic fragment of the DinB homolog (Dbh) polymerase from Sulfolobus solfataricus and show that it is nonprocessive and can bypass an abasic site. The structure of the catalytic domain is nearly identical to those of most other polymerase families. Homology modeling suggests that there is minimal contact between protein and DNA, that the nascent base pair binding pocket is quite accessible, and that the enzyme is already in a closed conformation characteristic of ternary polymerase complexes. These observations afford insights into the sources of low fidelity and low processivity of the UmuC/DinB polymerases.     

跨损伤合成的DNA聚合酶——一类新的DNA聚合酶

细胞虽然拥有多种修复途径,但有些DNA损伤仍不可避免地会逃避修复而在基因组上保留下来,细胞跨损伤DNA合成的分子机制一直是DNA修复中主要的未解决问题之一.最近通过对一类结构相关性UmuC/DinB蛋白质超家族成员的研究发现它们具有DNA聚合酶功能.这类新发现的DNA聚合酶不同于经典的复制性DNA聚合酶,它们能以易误/突变(error-prone/mutagenic)或无误(error-free)方式进行跨损伤(translesion)DNA合成,并且从细菌到人在进化上功能保守.     

umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity is a manifestation of functions of the UmuD(2)C complex involved in a DNA damage checkpoint control

The umuDC genes are part of the Escherichia coli SOS response, and their expression is induced as a consequence of DNA damage. After induction, they help to promote cell survival via two temporally separate pathways. First, UmuD and UmuC together participate in a cell cycle checkpoint control; second, UmuD'(2)C enables translesion DNA replication over any remaining unrepaired or irreparable lesions in the DNA. Furthermore, elevated expression of the umuDC gene products leads to a cold-sensitive growth phenotype that correlates with a rapid inhibition of DNA synthesis. Here, using two mutant umuC alleles, one that encodes a UmuC derivative that lacks a detectable DNA polymerase activity (umuC104; D101N) and another that encodes a derivative that is unable to confer cold sensitivity but is proficient for SOS mutagenesis (umuC125; A39V), we show that umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity can be genetically separated from the role of UmuD'(2)C in SOS mutagenesis. Our genetic and biochemical characterizations of UmuC derivatives bearing nested deletions of C-terminal sequences indicate that umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity is not due solely to the single-stranded DNA binding activity of UmuC. Taken together, our analyses suggest that umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity is conferred by an activity of the UmuD(2)C complex and not by the separate actions of the UmuD and UmuC proteins. Finally, we present evidence for structural differences between UmuD and UmuD' in solution, consistent with the notion that these differences are important for the temporal regulation of the two separate physiological roles of the umuDC gene products.     

The genetic requirements for UmuDC-mediated cold sensitivity are distinct from those for SOS mutagenesis.

The umuDC operon of Escherichia coli, a member of the SOS regulon, is required for SOS mutagenesis. Following the posttranslational processing of UmuD to UmuD' by RecA-mediated cleavage, UmuD' acts in concert with UmuC, RecA, and DNA polymerase III to facilitate the process of translesion synthesis, which results in the introduction of mutations. Constitutive expression of the umuDC operon causes an inhibition of growth at 30 degrees C (cold sensitivity). The umuDC-dependent physiological phenomenon manifested as cold-sensitive growth is shown to differ from SOS mutagenesis in two respects. Intact UmuD, the form inactive in SOS mutagenesis, confers a significantly higher degree of cold sensitivity in combination with UmUC than does UmuD'. In addition, umuDC-mediated cold sensitivity, unlike SOS mutagenesis, does not require recA function. Since the RecA protein mediates the autodigestion of UnmD to UmuD', this finding supports the conclusion that intact UmuD is capable of conferring cold sensitivity in the presence of UmuC. The degree of inhibition of growth at 30 degrees C correlates with the levels of UmuD and UmuC, which are the only two SOS-regulated proteins required to observe cold sensitivity. Analysis of the cellular morphology of strains that exhibit cold sensitivity for growth led to the finding that constitutive expression of the umuDC operon causes a novel form of sulA- and sfiC-independent filamentation at 30 degrees C. This filamentation is observed in a strain constitutively expressing the single, chromosomal copy of umuDC and can be suppressed by overexpression of the ftsQAZ operon.     

Escherichia coli UmuC active site mutants: Effects on translesion DNA synthesis, mutagenesis and cell survival

Escherichia coli polymerase V (pol V/UmuD(2)'C) is a low-fidelity DNA polymerase that has recently been shown to avidly incorporate ribonucleotides (rNTPs) into undamaged DNA. The fidelity and sugar selectivity of pol V can be modified by missense mutations around the "steric gate" of UmuC. Here, we analyze the ability of three steric gate mutants of UmuC to facilitate translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) of a cyclobutane pyrimidine dimer (CPD) in vitro, and to promote UV-induced mutagenesis and cell survival in vivo. The pol V (UmuC_F10L) mutant discriminates against rNTP and incorrect dNTP incorporation much better than wild-type pol V and although exhibiting a reduced ability to bypass a CPD in vitro, does so with high-fidelity and consequently produces minimal UV-induced mutagenesis in vivo. In contrast, pol V (UmuC_Y11A) readily misincorporates both rNTPs and dNTPs during efficient TLS of the CPD in vitro. However, cells expressing umuD'C(Y11A) were considerably more UV-sensitive and exhibited lower levels of UV-induced mutagenesis than cells expressing wild-type umuD'C or umuD'C(Y11F). We propose that the increased UV-sensitivity and reduced UV-mutability of umuD'C(Y11A) is due to excessive incorporation of rNTPs during TLS that are subsequently targeted for repair, rather than an inability to traverse UV-induced lesions.     

Two processivity clamp interactions differentially alter the dual activities of UmuC

DNA polymerases of the Y family promote survival by their ability to synthesize past lesions in the DNA template. One Escherichia coli member of this family, DNA pol V (UmuC), which is primarily responsible for UV-induced and chemically induced mutagenesis, possesses a canonical beta processivity clamp-binding motif. A detailed analysis of this motif in DNA pol V (UmuC) showed that mutation of only two residues in UmuC is sufficient to result in a loss of UV-induced mutagenesis. Increased levels of wild-type beta can partially rescue this loss of mutagenesis. Alterations in this motif of UmuC also cause loss of the cold-sensitive and beta-dependent synthetic lethal phenotypes associated with increased levels of UmuD and UmuC that are thought to represent an exaggeration of a DNA damage checkpoint. By designing compensatory mutations in the cleft between domains II and III in beta, we restored UV-induced mutagenesis by a UmuC beta-binding motif variant. A recent co-crystal structure of the 'little finger' domain of E. coli pol IV (DinB) with beta suggests that, in addition to the canonical beta-binding motif, a second site of pol IV ((303)VWP(305)) interacts with beta at the outer rim of the dimer interface. Mutational analysis of the corresponding motif in UmuC showed that it is dispensable for induced mutagenesis, but that alterations in this motif result in loss of the cold-sensitive phenotype. These two beta interaction sites of UmuC affect the dual functions of UmuC differentially and indicate subtle and sophisticated polymerase management by the beta clamp.     

DNA polymerase iota and related rad30-like enzymes

Until recently, the molecular mechanisms of translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), a process whereby a damaged base is used as a template for continued replication, was poorly understood. This area of scientific research has, however, been revolutionized by the finding that proteins long implicated in TLS are, in fact, DNA polymerases. Members of this so-called UmuC/DinB/Rev1/Rad30 superfamily of polymerases have been identified in prokaryotes, eukaryotes and archaea. Biochemical studies with the highly purified polymerases reveal that some, but not all, can traverse blocking lesions in template DNA. All of them share a common feature, however, in that they exhibit low fidelity when replicating undamaged DNA. Of particular interest to us is the Rad30 subfamily of polymerases found exclusively in eukaryotes. Humans possess two Rad30 paralogs, Rad30A and Rad30B. The RAD30A gene encodes DNA polymerase eta and defects in the protein lead to the xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP-V) phenotype in humans. Very recently RAD30B has also been shown to encode a novel DNA polymerase, designated as Pol iota. Based upon in vitro studies, it appears that Pol iota has the lowest fidelity of any eukaryotic polymerase studied to date and we speculate as to the possible cellular functions of such a remarkably error-prone DNA polymerase.     

Accessory proteins assist exonuclease-deficient bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase in replicating past an abasic site

Replicative DNA polymerases, such as T4 polymerase, possess both elongation and 3'-5' exonuclease proofreading catalytic activities. They arrest at the base preceding DNA damage on the coding DNA strand and specialized DNA polymerases have evolved to replicate across the lesion by a process known as TLS (translesion DNA synthesis). TLS is considered to take place in two steps that often require different enzymes, insertion of a nucleotide opposite the damaged template base followed by extension from the inserted nucleotide. We and others have observed that inactivation of the 3'-5' exonuclease function of T4 polymerase enables TLS across a single site-specific abasic [AP (apurinic/apyrimidinic)] lesion. In the present study we report a role for auxiliary replicative factors in this reaction. When replication is performed with a large excess of DNA template over DNA polymerase in the absence of auxiliary factors, the exo- polymerase (T4 DNA polymerase deficient in the 3'-5' exonuclease activity) inserts one nucleotide opposite the AP site but does not extend past the lesion. Addition of the clamp processivity factor and the clamp loader complex restores primer extension across an AP lesion on a circular AP-containing DNA substrate by the exo- polymerase, but has no effect on the wild-type enzyme. Hence T4 DNA polymerase exhibits a variety of responses to DNA damage. It can behave as a replicative polymerase or (in the absence of proofreading activity) as a specialized DNA polymerase and carry out TLS. As a specialized polymerase it can function either as an inserter or (with the help of accessory proteins) as an extender. The capacity to separate these distinct functions in a single DNA polymerase provides insight into the biochemical requirements for translesion DNA synthesis.