Less label, more free: approaches in label-free quantitative mass spectrometry

In this review we examine techniques, software, and statistical analyses used in label-free quantitative proteomics studies for area under the curve and spectral counting approaches. Recent advances in the field are discussed in an order that reflects a logical workflow design. Examples of studies that follow this design are presented to highlight the requirement for statistical assessment and further experiments to validate results from label-free quantitation. Limitations of label-free approaches are considered, label-free approaches are compared with labelling techniques, and forward-looking applications for label-free quantitative data are presented. We conclude that label-free quantitative proteomics is a reliable, versatile, and cost-effective alternative to labelled quantitation.     

Comparative LC-MS: a landscape of peaks and valleys

Quantitative proteomics approaches using stable isotopes are well-known and used in many labs nowadays. More recently, high resolution quantitative approaches are reported that rely on LC-MS quantitation of peptide concentrations by comparing peak intensities between multiple runs obtained by continuous detection in MS mode. Characteristic of these comparative LC-MS procedures is that they do not rely on the use of stable isotopes; therefore the procedure is often referred to as label-free LC-MS. In order to compare at comprehensive scale peak intensity data in multiple LC-MS datasets, dedicated software is required for detection, matching and alignment of peaks. The high accuracy in quantitative determination of peptide abundance provides an impressive level of detail. This approach also requires an experimental set-up where quantitative aspects of protein extraction and reproducible separation conditions need to be well controlled. In this paper we will provide insight in the critical parameters that affect the quality of the results and list an overview of the most recent software packages that are available for this procedure.     

Experimental and computational approaches to quantitative proteomics: status quo and outlook

Proteomics has come a long way from the initial qualitative analysis of proteins present in a given sample at a given time (“cataloguing”) to large-scale characterization of proteomes, their interactions and dynamic behavior. Originally enabled by breakthroughs in protein separation and visualization (by two-dimensional gels) and protein identification (by mass spectrometry), the discipline now encompasses a large body of protein and peptide separation, labeling, detection and sequencing tools supported by computational data processing. The decisive mass spectrometric developments and most recent instrumentation news are briefly mentioned accompanied by a short review of gel and chromatographic techniques for protein/peptide separation, depletion and enrichment. Special emphasis is placed on quantification techniques: gel-based, and label-free techniques are briefly discussed whereas stable-isotope coding and internal peptide standards are extensively reviewed. Another special chapter is dedicated to software and computing tools for proteomic data processing and validation. A short assessment of the status quo and recommendations for future developments round up this journey through quantitative proteomics.     

Use of DNA ladders for reproducible protein fractionation by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) for quantitative proteomics

In proteomics, one-dimensional (1D) sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) is widely used for protein fractionation prior to mass spectrometric analysis to enhance the dynamic range of analysis and to improve the identification of low-abundance proteins. Such protein prefractionation works well for quantitation strategies if the proteins are labeled prior to separation. However, because of the poor reproducibility of cutting gel slices, especially when small amounts of samples are analyzed, its application in label-free and peptide-labeling quantitative proteomics methods has been greatly limited. To overcome this limitation, we developed a new strategy in which a DNA ladder is mixed with the protein sample before PAGE separation. After PAGE separation, the DNA ladder is stained to allow for easy, precise, and reproducible gel cutting. To this end, a novel visible DNA-staining method was developed. This staining method is fast, sensitive, and compatible with mass spectrometry. To evaluate the reproducibility of DNA-ladder-assisted gel cutting for quantitative protein fractionation, we used stable isotope labeling with amino acids in cell culture (SILAC). Our results show that the quantitative error associated with fractionation can be minimized using the DNA-assisted fractionation and multiple replicates of gel cutting. In conclusion, 1D PAGE fractionation in combination with DNA ladders can be used for label-free comparative proteomics without compromising quantitation.     

Detecting differential and correlated protein expression in label-free shotgun proteomics

Recent studies have revealed a relationship between protein abundance and sampling statistics, such as sequence coverage, peptide count, and spectral count, in label-free liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) shotgun proteomics. The use of sampling statistics offers a promising method of measuring relative protein abundance and detecting differentially expressed or coexpressed proteins. We performed a systematic analysis of various approaches to quantifying differential protein expression in eukaryotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae and prokaryotic Rhodopseudomonas palustris label-free LC-MS/MS data. First, we showed that, among three sampling statistics, the spectral count has the highest technical reproducibility, followed by the less-reproducible peptide count and relatively nonreproducible sequence coverage. Second, we used spectral count statistics to measure differential protein expression in pairwise experiments using five statistical tests: Fisher's exact test, G-test, AC test, t-test, and LPE test. Given the S. cerevisiae data set with spiked proteins as a benchmark and the false positive rate as a metric, our evaluation suggested that the Fisher's exact test, G-test, and AC test can be used when the number of replications is limited (one or two), whereas the t-test is useful with three or more replicates available. Third, we generalized the G-test to increase the sensitivity of detecting differential protein expression under multiple experimental conditions. Out of 1622 identified R. palustris proteins in the LC-MS/MS experiment, the generalized G-test detected 1119 differentially expressed proteins under six growth conditions. Finally, we studied correlated expression of these 1119 proteins by analyzing pairwise expression correlations and by delineating protein clusters according to expression patterns. Through pairwise expression correlation analysis, we demonstrated that proteins co-located in the same operon were much more strongly coexpressed than those from different operons. Combining cluster analysis with existing protein functional annotations, we identified six protein clusters with known biological significance. In summary, the proposed generalized G-test using spectral count sampling statistics is a viable methodology for robust quantification of relative protein abundance and for sensitive detection of biologically significant differential protein expression under multiple experimental conditions in label-free shotgun proteomics.     

Quantitative proteomic analyses of crop seedlings subjected to stress conditions; a commentary

Quantitative proteomics is one of the analytical approaches used to clarify crop responses to stress conditions. Recent remarkable advances in proteomics technologies allow for the identification of a wider range of proteins than was previously possible. Current proteomic methods fall into roughly two categories: gel-based quantification methods, including conventional two-dimensional gel electrophoresis and two-dimensional fluorescence difference gel electrophoresis, and MS-based quantification methods consists of label-based and label-free protein quantification approaches. Although MS-based quantification methods have become mainstream in recent years, gel-based quantification methods are still useful for proteomic analyses. Previous studies examining crop responses to stress conditions reveal that each method has both advantages and disadvantages in regard to protein quantification in comparative proteomic analyses. Furthermore, one proteomics approach cannot be fully substituted by another technique. In this review, we discuss and highlight the basis and applications of quantitative proteomic analysis approaches in crop seedlings in response to flooding and osmotic stress as two environmental stresses.     

Influence of clotting time on the protein composition of serum samples based on LC-MS data

Many large, disease-related biobanks of serum samples have been established prior to the widespread use of proteomics in biomarker research. These biobanks may contain relevant information about the disease process, response to therapy or patient classifications especially with respect to long-term follow-up that is otherwise very difficult to obtain based on newly initiated studies, particularly in the case of slowly developing diseases. An important parameter that may influence the composition of serum but that is often not exactly known is clotting time. We therefore investigated the influence of clotting time on the protein and peptide composition of serum by label-free and stable-isotope labeling techniques. The label-free analysis of trypsin-digested serum showed that the overall pattern of LC-MS data is not affected by clotting times varying from 2 to 8h. However, univariate and multivariate statistical analyses revealed that proteins that are directly involved in blood clot formation, such as the clotting-derived fibrinopeptides, change significantly. This is most easily detected in the supernatant of acid-precipitated, immunodepleted serum. Stable-isotope labeling techniques show that truncated or phosphorylated forms of fibrinopeptides A and B increase or decrease depending on clotting time. These patterns can be easily recognized and should be taken into consideration when analyzing LC-MS data using serum sample collections of which the clotting time is not known. Next to the fibrinopeptides, leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein (P02750) was shown to be consistently decreased in samples with clotting times of more than 1h. For prospective studies, we recommend to let blood clot for at least 2h at room temperature using glass tubes with a separation gel and micronized silica to accelerate blood clotting.     

定量蛋白质组学无标记定量方法的研究进展

依靠质谱技术的蛋白质组学快速发展,寻求速度快、重复性好以及准确度高的定量方法是该领域的一项艰巨任务,定量蛋白质组学分支领域应运而生．其中,无标记定量方法以其样品制备简单、耗材费用低廉以及结果数据分析便捷等优点渐露锋芒．无标记定量方法通常分为信号强度法和谱图计数法两大类．本文在这两种无标记定量方法计算原理的基础上,针对各种常用的无标记定量方法及最新进展做一个较为全面的介绍,并将详细讨论两类方法的异同点,以及目前蛋白质组学中无标记定量方法所面临的主要挑战,希望能为这一领域的研究人员在选择无标记定量方法时提供一个合理的参考．     

A phase synchronization clustering algorithm for identifying interesting groups of genes from cell cycle expression data

Background

Quantitative proteomics holds great promise for identifying proteins that are differentially abundant between populations representing different physiological or disease states. A range of computational tools is now available for both isotopically labeled and label-free liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based quantitative proteomics. However, they are generally not comparable to each other in terms of functionality, user interfaces, information input/output, and do not readily facilitate appropriate statistical data analysis. These limitations, along with the array of choices, present a daunting prospect for biologists, and other researchers not trained in bioinformatics, who wish to use LC-MS-based quantitative proteomics.

Results

We have developed Corra, a computational framework and tools for discovery-based LC-MS proteomics. Corra extends and adapts existing algorithms used for LC-MS-based proteomics, and statistical algorithms, originally developed for microarray data analyses, appropriate for LC-MS data analysis. Corra also adapts software engineering technologies (e.g. Google Web Toolkit, distributed processing) so that computationally intense data processing and statistical analyses can run on a remote server, while the user controls and manages the process from their own computer via a simple web interface. Corra also allows the user to output significantly differentially abundant LC-MS-detected peptide features in a form compatible with subsequent sequence identification via tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). We present two case studies to illustrate the application of Corra to commonly performed LC-MS-based biological workflows: a pilot biomarker discovery study of glycoproteins isolated from human plasma samples relevant to type 2 diabetes, and a study in yeast to identify in vivo targets of the protein kinase Ark1 via phosphopeptide profiling.

Conclusion

The Corra computational framework leverages computational innovation to enable biologists or other researchers to process, analyze and visualize LC-MS data with what would otherwise be a complex and not user-friendly suite of tools. Corra enables appropriate statistical analyses, with controlled false-discovery rates, ultimately to inform subsequent targeted identification of differentially abundant peptides by MS/MS. For the user not trained in bioinformatics, Corra represents a complete, customizable, free and open source computational platform enabling LC-MS-based proteomic workflows, and as such, addresses an unmet need in the LC-MS proteomics field.     

Initial development and validation of a novel extraction method for quantitative mining of the formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue proteome for biomarker investigations

Annotated formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue archives constitute a valuable resource for retrospective biomarker discovery. However, proteomic exploration of archival tissue is impeded by extensive formalin-induced covalent cross-linking. Robust methodology enabling proteomic profiling of archival resources is urgently needed. Recent work is beginning to support the feasibility of biomarker discovery in archival tissues, but further developments in extraction methods which are compatible with quantitative approaches are urgently needed. We report a cost-effective extraction methodology permitting quantitative proteomic analyses of small amounts of FFPE tissue for biomarker investigation. This surfactant/heat-based approach results in effective and reproducible protein extraction in FFPE tissue blocks. In combination with a liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based label-free quantitative proteomics methodology, the protocol enables the robust representative and quantitative analyses of the archival proteome. Preliminary validation studies in renal cancer tissues have identified typically 250-300 proteins per 500 ng of tissue with 1D LC-MS/MS with comparable extraction in FFPE and fresh frozen tissue blocks and preservation of tumor/normal differential expression patterns (205 proteins, r = 0.682; p < 10(-15)). The initial methodology presented here provides a quantitative approach for assessing the potential suitability of the vast FFPE tissue archives as an alternate resource for biomarker discovery and will allow exploration of methods to increase depth of coverage and investigate the impact of preanalytical factors.     

Comparative Analysis of Label-Free and 8-Plex iTRAQ Approach for Quantitative Tissue Proteomic Analysis

High resolution proteomics approaches have been successfully utilized for the comprehensive characterization of the cell proteome. However, in the case of quantitative proteomics an open question still remains, which quantification strategy is best suited for identification of biologically relevant changes, especially in clinical specimens. In this study, a thorough comparison of a label-free approach (intensity-based) and 8-plex iTRAQ was conducted as applied to the analysis of tumor tissue samples from non-muscle invasive and muscle-invasive bladder cancer. For the latter, two acquisition strategies were tested including analysis of unfractionated and fractioned iTRAQ-labeled peptides. To reduce variability, aliquots of the same protein extract were used as starting material, whereas to obtain representative results per method further sample processing and MS analysis were conducted according to routinely applied protocols. Considering only multiple-peptide identifications, LC-MS/MS analysis resulted in the identification of 910, 1092 and 332 proteins by label-free, fractionated and unfractionated iTRAQ, respectively. The label-free strategy provided higher protein sequence coverage compared to both iTRAQ experiments. Even though pre-fraction of the iTRAQ labeled peptides allowed for a higher number of identifications, this was not accompanied by a respective increase in the number of differentially expressed changes detected. Validity of the proteomics output related to protein identification and differential expression was determined by comparison to existing data in the field (Protein Atlas and published data on the disease). All methods predicted changes which to a large extent agreed with published data, with label-free providing a higher number of significant changes than iTRAQ. Conclusively, both label-free and iTRAQ (when combined to peptide fractionation) provide high proteome coverage and apparently valid predictions in terms of differential expression, nevertheless label-free provides higher sequence coverage and ultimately detects a higher number of differentially expressed proteins. The risk for receiving false associations still exists, particularly when analyzing highly heterogeneous biological samples, raising the need for the analysis of higher sample numbers and/or application of adjustment for multiple testing.     

Toward the complete yeast mitochondrial proteome: multidimensional separation techniques for mitochondrial proteomics

Proteomic analyses of different subcellular compartments, so-called organellar proteomics, facilitate the understanding of cellular functions on a molecular level. In this work, various orthogonal multidimensional separation techniques both on the protein and on the peptide level are compared with regard to the number of identified proteins as well as the classes of proteins accessible by the respective methodology. The most complete overview was achieved by a combination of such orthogonal techniques as shown by the analysis of the yeast mitochondrial proteome. A total of 851 different proteins (PROMITO dataset) were identified by use of multidimensional LC-MS/MS, 1D-SDS-PAGE combined with nano-LC-MS/MS and 2D-PAGE with subsequent MALDI-mass fingerprinting. Our PROMITO approach identified the 749 proteins, which were found in the largest previous study on the yeast mitochondrial proteome, and additionally 102 proteins including 42 open reading frames with unknown function, providing the basis for a more detailed elucidation of mitochondrial processes. Comparison of the different approaches emphasizes a bias of 2D-PAGE against proteins with very high isoelectric points as well as large and hydrophobic proteins, which can be accessed more appropriately by the other methods. While 2D-PAGE has advantages in the possible separation of protein isoforms and quantitative differential profiling, 1D-SDS-PAGE with nano-LC-MS/MS and multidimensional LC-MS/MS are better suited for efficient protein identification as they are less biased against distinct classes of proteins. Thus, comprehensive proteome analyses can only be realized by a combination of such orthogonal approaches, leading to the largest dataset available for the mitochondrial proteome of yeast.     

Increased Power for the Analysis of Label-free LC-MS/MS Proteomics Data by Combining Spectral Counts and Peptide Peak Attributes

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based proteomics provides a wealth of information about proteins present in biological samples. In bottom-up LC-MS/MS-based proteomics, proteins are enzymatically digested into peptides prior to query by LC-MS/MS. Thus, the information directly available from the LC-MS/MS data is at the peptide level. If a protein-level analysis is desired, the peptide-level information must be rolled up into protein-level information. We propose a principal component analysis-based statistical method, ProPCA, for efficiently estimating relative protein abundance from bottom-up label-free LC-MS/MS data that incorporates both spectral count information and LC-MS peptide ion peak attributes, such as peak area, volume, or height. ProPCA may be used effectively with a variety of quantification platforms and is easily implemented. We show that ProPCA outperformed existing quantitative methods for peptide-protein roll-up, including spectral counting methods and other methods for combining LC-MS peptide peak attributes. The performance of ProPCA was validated using a data set derived from the LC-MS/MS analysis of a mixture of protein standards (the UPS2 proteomic dynamic range standard introduced by The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Proteomics Standards Research Group in 2006). Finally, we applied ProPCA to a comparative LC-MS/MS analysis of digested total cell lysates prepared for LC-MS/MS analysis by alternative lysis methods and show that ProPCA identified more differentially abundant proteins than competing methods.One of the fundamental goals of proteomics methods for the biological sciences is to identify and quantify all proteins present in a sample. LC-MS/MS-based proteomics methodologies offer a promising approach to this problem (1–3). These methodologies allow for the acquisition of a vast amount of information about the proteins present in a sample. However, extracting reliable protein abundance information from LC-MS/MS data remains challenging. In this work, we were primarily concerned with the analysis of data acquired using bottom-up label-free LC-MS/MS-based proteomics techniques where “bottom-up” refers to the fact that proteins are enzymatically digested into peptides prior to query by the LC-MS/MS instrument platform (4), and “label-free” indicates that analyses are performed without the aid of stable isotope labels. One challenge inherent in the bottom-up approach to proteomics is that information directly available from the LC-MS/MS data is at the peptide level. When a protein-level analysis is desired, as is often the case with discovery-driven LC-MS research, peptide-level information must be rolled up into protein-level information.Spectral counting (5–10) is a straightforward and widely used example of peptide-protein roll-up for LC-MS/MS data. Information experimentally acquired in single stage (MS) and tandem (MS/MS) spectra may lead to the assignment of MS/MS spectra to peptide sequences in a database-driven or database-free manner using various peptide identification software platforms (SEQUEST (11) and Mascot (12), for instance); the identified peptide sequences correspond, in turn, to proteins. In principle, the number of tandem spectra matched to peptides corresponding to a certain protein, the spectral count (SC),1 is positively associated with the abundance of a protein (5). In spectral counting techniques, raw or normalized SCs are used as a surrogate for protein abundance. Spectral counting methods have been moderately successful in quantifying protein abundance and identifying significant proteins in various settings. However, SC-based methods do not make full use of information available from peaks in the LC-MS domain, and this surely leads to loss of efficiency.Peaks in the LC-MS domain corresponding to peptide ion species are highly sensitive to differences in protein abundance (13, 14). Identifying LC-MS peaks that correspond to detected peptides and measuring quantitative attributes of these peaks (such as height, area, or volume) offers a promising alternative to spectral counting methods. These methods have become especially popular in applications using stable isotope labeling (15). However, challenges remain, especially in the label-free analysis of complex proteomics samples where complications in peak detection, alignment, and integration are a significant obstacle. In practice, alignment, identification, and quantification of LC-MS peptide peak attributes (PPAs) may be accomplished using recently developed peak matching platforms (16–18). A highly sensitive indicator of protein abundance may be obtained by rolling up PPA measurements into protein-level information (16, 19, 20). Existing peptide-protein roll-up procedures based on PPAs typically involve taking the mean of (possibly normalized) PPA measurements over all peptides corresponding to a protein to obtain a protein-level estimate of abundance. Despite the promise of PPA-based procedures for protein quantification, the performance of PPA-based methods may vary widely depending on the particular roll-up procedure used; furthermore, PPA-based procedures are limited by difficulties in accurately identifying and measuring peptide peak attributes. These two issues are related as the latter issue affects the robustness of PPA-based roll-up methods. Indeed, existing peak matching and quantification platforms tend to result in PPA measurement data sets with substantial missingness (16, 19, 21), especially when working with very complex samples where substantial dynamic ranges and ion suppression are difficulties that must be overcome. Missingness may, in turn, lead to instability in protein-level abundance estimates. A good peptide-protein roll-up procedure that utilizes PPAs should account for this missingness and the resulting instability in a principled way. However, even in the absence of missingness, there is no consensus in the existing literature on peptide-protein roll-up for PPA measurements.In this work, we propose ProPCA, a peptide-protein roll-up method for efficiently extracting protein abundance information from bottom-up label-free LC-MS/MS data. ProPCA is an easily implemented, unsupervised method that is related to principle component analysis (PCA) (22). ProPCA optimally combines SC and PPA data to obtain estimates of relative protein abundance. ProPCA addresses missingness in PPA measurement data in a unified way while capitalizing on strengths of both SCs and PPA-based roll-up methods. In particular, ProPCA adapts to the quality of the available PPA measurement data. If the PPA measurement data are poor and, in the extreme case, no PPA measurements are available, then ProPCA is equivalent to spectral counting. On the other hand, if there is no missingness in the PPA measurement data set, then the ProPCA estimate is a weighted mean of PPA measurements and spectral counts where the weights are chosen to reflect the ability of spectral counts and each peptide to predict protein abundance.Below, we assess the performance of ProPCA using a data set obtained from the LC-MS/MS analysis of protein standards (UPS2 proteomic dynamic range standard set² manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich) and show that ProPCA outperformed other existing roll-up methods by multiple metrics. The applicability of ProPCA is not limited by the quantification platform used to obtain SCs and PPA measurements. To demonstrate this, we show that ProPCA continued to perform well when used with an alternative quantification platform. Finally, we applied ProPCA to a comparative LC-MS/MS analysis of digested total human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cell lysates prepared for LC-MS/MS analysis by alternative lysis methods. We show that ProPCA identified more differentially abundant proteins than competing methods.     

A combination of immobilised pH gradients improves membrane proteomics

Membrane protein analyses have been notoriously difficult due to hydrophobicity and the general low abundance of these proteins compared to their soluble cytosolic counterparts. Shotgun proteomics has become the preferred method for analyses of membrane proteins, in particular the recent development of peptide immobilized pH gradient isoelectric focusing (IPG-IEF) as the first dimension of two-dimensional shotgun proteomics. Recently, peptide IPG-IEF has been shown to be a valuable shotgun proteomics technique through the use of acidic narrow range IPG strips, which demonstrated that small acidic p I increments are rich in peptides. In this study, we assess the utility of both broad range (BR) (p I 3-10) and narrow range (NR) (p I 3.4-4.9) IPG strips for rat liver membrane protein analyses. Furthermore, the use of these IPG strips was evaluated using label-free quantitation to demonstrate that the identification of a subset of proteins can be improved using NR IPG strips. NR IPG strips provided 2603 protein assignments on average (with 826 integral membrane proteins (IMPs)) compared to BR IPG strips, which provided 2021 protein assignments on average (with 712 IMPs). Nonredundant protein analysis demonstrated that in total from all experiments, 4195 proteins (with 1301 IMPs) could be identified with 1428 of these proteins unique to NR IPG strips with only 636 from BR IPG strips. With the use of label-free quantitation methods, 1659 proteins were used for quantitative comparison of which 319 demonstrated statistically significant increases in normalized spectral abundance factors (NSAF) in NR IPG strips compared to 364 in BR IPG strips. In particular, a selection of six highly hydrophobic transmembrane proteins was observed to increase in NSAF using NR IPG strips. These results provide evidence for the use of alternative pH gradients in combination to improve the shotgun proteomic analysis of the membrane proteome.     

Highly reproducible label free quantitative proteomic analysis of RNA polymerase complexes

The use of quantitative proteomics methods to study protein complexes has the potential to provide in-depth information on the abundance of different protein components as well as their modification state in various cellular conditions. To interrogate protein complex quantitation using shotgun proteomic methods, we have focused on the analysis of protein complexes using label-free multidimensional protein identification technology and studied the reproducibility of biological replicates. For these studies, we focused on three highly related and essential multi-protein enzymes, RNA polymerase I, II, and III from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. We found that label-free quantitation using spectral counting is highly reproducible at the protein and peptide level when analyzing RNA polymerase I, II, and III. In addition, we show that peptide sampling does not follow a random sampling model, and we show the need for advanced computational models to predict peptide detection probabilities. In order to address these issues, we used the APEX protocol to model the expected peptide detectability based on whole cell lysate acquired using the same multidimensional protein identification technology analysis used for the protein complexes. Neither method was able to predict the peptide sampling levels that we observed using replicate multidimensional protein identification technology analyses. In addition to the analysis of the RNA polymerase complexes, our analysis provides quantitative information about several RNAP associated proteins including the RNAPII elongation factor complexes DSIF and TFIIF. Our data shows that DSIF and TFIIF are the most highly enriched RNAP accessory factors in Rpb3-TAP purifications and demonstrate our ability to measure low level associated protein abundance across biological replicates. In addition, our quantitative data supports a model in which DSIF and TFIIF interact with RNAPII in a dynamic fashion in agreement with previously published reports.     

A software suite for the generation and comparison of peptide arrays from sets of data collected by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry

There is an increasing interest in the quantitative proteomic measurement of the protein contents of substantially similar biological samples, e.g. for the analysis of cellular response to perturbations over time or for the discovery of protein biomarkers from clinical samples. Technical limitations of current proteomic platforms such as limited reproducibility and low throughput make this a challenging task. A new LC-MS-based platform is able to generate complex peptide patterns from the analysis of proteolyzed protein samples at high throughput and represents a promising approach for quantitative proteomics. A crucial component of the LC-MS approach is the accurate evaluation of the abundance of detected peptides over many samples and the identification of peptide features that can stratify samples with respect to their genetic, physiological, or environmental origins. We present here a new software suite, SpecArray, that generates a peptide versus sample array from a set of LC-MS data. A peptide array stores the relative abundance of thousands of peptide features in many samples and is in a format identical to that of a gene expression microarray. A peptide array can be subjected to an unsupervised clustering analysis to stratify samples or to a discriminant analysis to identify discriminatory peptide features. We applied the SpecArray to analyze two sets of LC-MS data: one was from four repeat LC-MS analyses of the same glycopeptide sample, and another was from LC-MS analysis of serum samples of five male and five female mice. We demonstrate through these two study cases that the SpecArray software suite can serve as an effective software platform in the LC-MS approach for quantitative proteomics.     

Quantitative plant proteomics

Quantitation is an inherent requirement in comparative proteomics and there is no exception to this for plant proteomics. Quantitative proteomics has high demands on the experimental workflow, requiring a thorough design and often a complex multi-step structure. It has to include sufficient numbers of biological and technical replicates and methods that are able to facilitate a quantitative signal read-out. Quantitative plant proteomics in particular poses many additional challenges but because of the nature of plants it also offers some potential advantages. In general, analysis of plants has been less prominent in proteomics. Low protein concentration, difficulties in protein extraction, genome multiploidy, high Rubisco abundance in green tissue, and an absence of well-annotated and completed genome sequences are some of the main challenges in plant proteomics. However, the latter is now changing with several genomes emerging for model plants and crops such as potato, tomato, soybean, rice, maize and barley. This review discusses the current status in quantitative plant proteomics (MS-based and non-MS-based) and its challenges and potentials. Both relative and absolute quantitation methods in plant proteomics from DIGE to MS-based analysis after isotope labeling and label-free quantitation are described and illustrated by published studies. In particular, we describe plant-specific quantitative methods such as metabolic labeling methods that can take full advantage of plant metabolism and culture practices, and discuss other potential advantages and challenges that may arise from the unique properties of plants.     

Integration of metabolomics and proteomics in molecular plant physiology--coping with the complexity by data-dimensionality reduction

In recent years, genomics has been extended to functional genomics. Toward the characterization of organisms or species on the genome level, changes on the metabolite and protein level have been shown to be essential to assign functions to genes and to describe the dynamic molecular phenotype. Gas chromatography (GC) and liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry (GC- and LC-MS) are well suited for the fast and comprehensive analysis of ultracomplex metabolite samples. For the integration of metabolite profiles with quantitative protein profiles, a high throughput (HTP) shotgun proteomics approach using LC-MS and label-free quantification of unique proteins in a complex protein digest is described. Multivariate statistics are applied to examine sample pattern recognition based on data-dimensionality reduction and biomarker identification in plant systems biology. The integration of the data reveal multiple correlative biomarkers providing evidence for an increase of information in such holistic approaches. With computational simulation of metabolic networks and experimental measurements, it can be shown that biochemical regulation is reflected by metabolite network dynamics measured in a metabolomics approach. Examples in molecular plant physiology are presented to substantiate the integrative approach.     

Quantitative profile of five murine core proteomes using label-free functional proteomics

Analysis of primary animal and human tissues is key in biological and biomedical research. Comparative proteomics analysis of primary biological material would benefit from uncomplicated experimental work flows capable of evaluating an unlimited number of samples. In this report we describe the application of label-free proteomics to the quantitative analysis of five mouse core proteomes. We developed a computer program and normalization procedures that allow exploitation of the quantitative data inherent in LC-MS/MS experiments for relative and absolute quantification of proteins in complex mixtures. Important features of this approach include (i) its ability to compare an unlimited number of samples, (ii) its applicability to primary tissues and cultured cells, (iii) its straightforward work flow without chemical reaction steps, and (iv) its usefulness not only for relative quantification but also for estimation of absolute protein abundance. We applied this approach to quantitatively characterize the most abundant proteins in murine brain, heart, kidney, liver, and lung. We matched 8,800 MS/MS peptide spectra to 1,500 proteins and generated 44,000 independent data points to profile the approximately 1,000 most abundant proteins in mouse tissues. This dataset provides a quantitative profile of the fundamental proteome of a mouse, identifies the major similarities and differences between organ-specific proteomes, and serves as a paradigm of how label-free quantitative MS can be used to characterize the phenotype of mammalian primary tissues at the molecular level.     

Mixed-effects statistical model for comparative LC-MS proteomics studies

Comparing a protein's concentrations across two or more treatments is the focus of many proteomics studies. A frequent source of measurements for these comparisons is a mass spectrometry (MS) analysis of a protein's peptide ions separated by liquid chromatography (LC) following its enzymatic digestion. Alas, LC-MS identification and quantification of equimolar peptides can vary significantly due to their unequal digestion, separation, and ionization. This unequal measurability of peptides, the largest source of LC-MS nuisance variation, stymies confident comparison of a protein's concentration across treatments. Our objective is to introduce a mixed-effects statistical model for comparative LC-MS proteomics studies. We describe LC-MS peptide abundance with a linear model featuring pivotal terms that account for unequal peptide LC-MS measurability. We advance fitting this model to an often incomplete LC-MS data set with REstricted Maximum Likelihood (REML) estimation, producing estimates of model goodness-of-fit, treatment effects, standard errors, confidence intervals, and protein relative concentrations. We illustrate the model with an experiment featuring a known dilution series of a filamentous ascomycete fungus Trichoderma reesei protein mixture. For 781 of the 1546 T. reesei proteins with sufficient data coverage, the fitted mixed-effects models capably described the LC-MS measurements. The LC-MS measurability terms effectively accounted for this major source of uncertainty. Ninety percent of the relative concentration estimates were within 0.5-fold of the true relative concentrations. Akin to the common ratio method, this model also produced biased estimates, albeit less biased. Bias decreased significantly, both absolutely and relative to the ratio method, as the number of observed peptides per protein increased. Mixed-effects statistical modeling offers a flexible, well-established methodology for comparative proteomics studies integrating common experimental designs with LC-MS sample processing plans. It favorably accounts for the unequal LC-MS measurability of peptides and produces informative quantitative comparisons of a protein's concentration across treatments with objective measures of uncertainties.