Poor base stacking at DNA lesions may initiate recognition by many repair proteins

A fundamental question in DNA repair is how a mismatched or modified base is detected when embedded in millions to billions of normal base pairs. A survey of the literature and structural database reveals a common feature in all repair protein-DNA complexes: the DNA double helix is discontinuous at a lesion site due to base unstacking, kinking and/or nucleotide extrusion. Lesions induce destabilization and distortion of short linear DNAs, and underwinding in negatively supercoiled DNA presumably could compound the reduced stability caused by a lesion. A hypothesis is thus put forward that DNA lesion recognition occurs in two steps. Repair proteins initially recognize the weakened base stacking, and thus a flexible hinge at a DNA lesion. Sampling of flexible hinges rather than all DNA base pairs can reduce the task of finding a lesion by two to three orders of magnitude, from searching millions base pairs to thousands. After the initial encounter, a repair protein scrutinizes the shape, hydrogen bonding and electrostatic potentials of bases at the flexible hinge and dissociates if it is not a correct substrate. MutS, which has a broad range of substrates, actively dissociates from non-specific binding via an ATP-dependent proofreading mechanism. A single lesion may thus be sampled by BER, NER and MMR proteins until repaired. This proposition immediately suggests a mechanism for crosstalk between different repair and signaling pathways. It also raises the possibility that sampling of a lesion by one protein could facilitate loading of another by direct protein-protein or DNA mediated interactions.     

Uracil‐DNA glycosylases—Structural and functional perspectives on an essential family of DNA repair enzymes

Uracil‐DNA glycosylases (UDGs) are evolutionarily conserved DNA repair enzymes that initiate the base excision repair pathway and remove uracil from DNA. The UDG superfamily is classified into six families based on their substrate specificity. This review focuses on the family I enzymes since these are the most extensively studied members of the superfamily. The structural basis for substrate specificity and base recognition as well as for DNA binding, nucleotide flipping and catalytic mechanism is discussed in detail. Other topics include the mechanism of lesion search and molecular mimicry through interaction with uracil‐DNA glycosylase inhibitors. The latest studies and findings detailing structure and function in the UDG superfamily are presented.     

Versatile protection from mutagenic DNA lesions conferred by bipartite recognition in nucleotide excision repair

Nucleotide excision repair is a cut-and-patch pathway that eliminates potentially mutagenic DNA lesions caused by ultraviolet light, electrophilic chemicals, oxygen radicals and many other genetic insults. Unlike antigen recognition by the immune system, which employs billions of immunoglobulins and T-cell receptors, the nucleotide excision repair complex relies on just a few generic factors to detect an extremely wide range of DNA adducts. This molecular versatility is achieved by a bipartite strategy initiated by the detection of abnormal strand fluctuations, followed by the localization of injured residues through an enzymatic scanning process coupled to DNA unwinding. The early recognition subunits are able to probe the thermodynamic properties of nucleic acid substrates but avoid direct contacts with chemically altered bases. Only downstream subunits of the bipartite recognition process interact more closely with damaged bases to delineate the sites of DNA incision. Thus, consecutive factors expand the spectrum of deleterious genetic lesions conveyed to DNA repair by detecting distinct molecular features of target substrates.     

Detection of bulky DNA lesions: DDB2 at the interface of chromatin and DNA repair in eukaryotes

Bulky DNA damage is corrected by the nucleotide excision repair (NER) pathway. Although the core biochemical mechanism of NER is understood, details including lesion recognition and repair in the context of chromatin remain to be elucidated. As more data become available, the complexity of lesion recognition in chromatin is becoming clear. This review will discuss current knowledge of DNA damage recognition in the context of chromatin, with a focus on the roles of chromatin remodeling and the specific lesion recognition protein DDB2 (DNA damage-binding protein 2) in chromatin repair. Additionally, we propose a model that ubiquitination-mediated DDB2 dissociation from chromatin, not its degradation, is important for GG-NER progression.     

Nucleotide excision repair in mammalia: mechanism of a primary damage recognition

Nucleotide excision repair is one of the most important pathways of DNA repair in eukaryotic cells. Defects of this system lead to serious diseases including certain kinds of cancer. Nucleotide excision repair is able to remove a wide range of the structurally diverse DNA damages such as UV induced pyrimidine dimers, bulky chemical adducts arising under the action of carcinogenic compounds or chemotherapeutical drugs on cellular DNA. A broad substrate specificity of this repair pathway is related to the main intriguing question that is the mechanism of damage recognition by the protein complex in the context of the large excess of undamaged DNA. This review is detailed on the key stage of nucleotide excision repair--the recognition of a lesion in DNA, which is still most debated. We have considered the main models of a primary damage recognition and preincision complex formation that have been suggested by the leading groups in this field. Data presented allow to suggest the model of sequential loading of the proteins of reparative complex on damage DNA as the most reasonable.     

Short-patch correction of C/C mismatches in human cells

We examined whether the human nucleotide excision repair complex, which is specialized on the removal of bulky DNA adducts, also displays a correcting activity on base mismatches. The cytosine/cytosine (C/C) lesion was used as a model substrate to monitor the correction of base mismatches in human cells. Fibroblasts with different repair capabilities were transfected with shuttle vectors that contain a site-directed C/C mismatch in the replication origin, accompanied by an additional C/C mismatch in one of the flanking sequences that are not essential for replication. Analysis of the vector progeny obtained from these doubly modified substrates revealed that C/C mismatches were eliminated before DNA synthesis not only in the repair-proficient background, but also when the target cells carried a genetic defect in long-patch mismatch repair, in nucleotide excision repair, or when both pathways were deleted. Furthermore, cells deficient for long-patch mismatch repair as well as a cell line that combines mismatch and nucleotide excision repair defects were able to correct multiple C/C mispairs, placed at distances of 21–44 nt, in an independent manner, such that the removal of each lesion led to individual repair patches. These results support the existence of a concurrent short-patch mechanism that rectifies C/C mismatches.     

A dynamic checkpoint in oxidative lesion discrimination by formamidopyrimidine–DNA glycosylase

In contrast to proteins recognizing small-molecule ligands, DNA-dependent enzymes cannot rely solely on interactions in the substrate-binding centre to achieve their exquisite specificity. It is widely believed that substrate recognition by such enzymes involves a series of conformational changes in the enzyme–DNA complex with sequential gates favoring cognate DNA and rejecting nonsubstrates. However, direct evidence for such mechanism is limited to a few systems. We report that discrimination between the oxidative DNA lesion, 8-oxoguanine (oxoG) and its normal counterpart, guanine, by the repair enzyme, formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg), likely involves multiple gates. Fpg uses an aromatic wedge to open the Watson–Crick base pair and everts the lesion into its active site. We used molecular dynamics simulations to explore the eversion free energy landscapes of oxoG and G by Fpg, focusing on structural and energetic details of oxoG recognition. The resulting energy profiles, supported by biochemical analysis of site-directed mutants disturbing the interactions along the proposed path, show that Fpg selectively facilitates eversion of oxoG by stabilizing several intermediate states, helping the rapidly sliding enzyme avoid full extrusion of every encountered base for interrogation. Lesion recognition through multiple gating intermediates may be a common theme in DNA repair enzymes.     

DNA repair triggered by sensors of helical dynamics

Nucleotide excision repair is a constitutive stress response that eliminates DNA lesions induced by multiple genotoxic agents. Unlike the immune system, which generates billions of immunoglobulins and T cell receptors for antigen recognition, the nucleotide excision repair complex uses only a few generic factors to detect an astounding diversity of DNA modifications. New data favor an unexpected strategy whereby damage recognition is initiated by the detection of abnormal oscillations in the undamaged strand opposite to DNA lesions. Another core subunit recognizes the increased susceptibility of DNA to be kinked at injured sites. We suggest that early nucleotide excision repair factors gain substrate versatility by avoiding direct contacts with modified residues and exploiting instead the altered dynamics of damaged DNA duplexes.     

The post-incision steps of the DNA base excision repair pathway in Escherichia coli: studies with a closed circular DNA substrate containing a single U:G base pair.

The DNA base excision repair pathway is responsible for removal of oxidative and endogenous DNA base damage in both prokaryotes and eukaryotes. This pathway involves formation of an apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site in the DNA, which is further processed to restore the integrity of the DNA. In Escherichia coli it has been suggested that the major mode of repair involves replacement of a single nucleotide at the AP site, based on repair synthesis studies using oligonucleotide substrates containing a unique uracil base. The mechanism of the post-incision steps of the bacterial base excision repair pathway was examined using a DNA plasmid substrate containing a single U:G base pair. Repair synthesis carried out by repair-proficient ung, recJ and xon E.coli cell extracts was analyzed by restriction endonuclease cleavage of the DNA containing the uracil lesion. It was found that replacement of the uracil base was always accompanied by replacement of several nucleotides ( approximately 15) 3' of the uracil and this process was absolutely dependent on initial removal of the uracil base by the action of uracil-DNA glycosylase. In contrast to findings with oligonucleotide substrates, replacement of just a single nucleotide at the lesion site was not detected. These results suggest that repair patch length may be substrate dependent and a re-evaluation of the post-incision steps of base excision repair is suggested.     

Human XPC-hHR23B interacts with XPA-RPA in the recognition of triplex-directed psoralen DNA interstrand crosslinks

DNA interstrand crosslinks (ICLs) represent a severe form of damage that blocks DNA metabolic processes and can lead to cell death or carcinogenesis. The repair of DNA ICLs in mammals is not well characterized. We have reported previously that a key protein complex of nucleotide excision repair (NER), XPA-RPA, recognizes DNA ICLs. We now report the use of triplex technology to direct a site-specific psoralen ICL to a target DNA substrate to determine whether the human global genome NER damage recognition complex, XPC-hHR23B, recognizes this lesion. Our results demonstrate that XPC-hHR23B recognizes psoralen ICLs, which have a structure fundamentally different from other lesions that XPC-hHR23B is known to bind, with high affinity and specificity. XPC-hHR23B and XPA-RPA protein complexes were also observed to bind psoralen ICLs simultaneously, demonstrating not only that psoralen ICLs are recognized by XPC-hHR23B alone, but also that XPA-RPA may interact cooperatively with XPC-hHR23B on damaged DNA, forming a multimeric complex. Since XPC-hHR23B and XPA-RPA participate in the recognition and verification of DNA damage, these results support the hypothesis that interplay between components of the global genome repair sub-pathway of NER is critical for the recognition of psoralen DNA ICLs in the mammalian genome.     

Repair of the major lesion resulting from C5'-oxidation of DNA

Oxidation of the C5'-position of DNA results in direct strand scission. The 3'-fragments produced contain DNA lesions at their 5'-termini. The major DNA lesion contains an aldehyde at its C5'-position, but its nucleobase is unmodified. Excision of the lesion formed from oxidation of thymidine (T-al) is achieved by strand displacement synthesis by DNA polymerase β (Pol β) in the presence or absence of flap endonuclease 1 (FEN1). Pol β displaces T-al and thymidine with comparable efficiency, but less so than a chemically stabilized abasic site analogue (F). FEN1 cleaves the flaps produced during strand displacement synthesis that are two nucleotides or longer. A ternary complex containing T-al is also a substrate for the bacterial UvrABC nucleotide excision repair system. The sites of strand scission are identical in ternary complexes containing T-al, thymidine, or F. UvrABC incision efficiency of these ternary complexes is comparable as well but significantly slower than a duplex substrate containing a bulky substituted thymidine. However, cleavage occurs only on the 5'-fragment and does not remove the lesion. These data suggest that unlike many lesions the redundant nature of base excision and nucleotide excision repair systems does not provide a means for removing the major damage product produced by agents that oxidize the C5'-position. This may contribute to the high cytotoxicity of drugs that oxidize the C5'-position in DNA.     

The structural basis of damaged DNA recognition and endonucleolytic cleavage for very short patch repair endonuclease

Endonucleases in DNA repair must be able to recognize damaged DNA as well as cleave the phosphodiester backbone. These functional prerequisites are manifested in very short patch repair (Vsr) endonuclease through a common endonuclease topology that has been tailored for recognition of TG mismatches. Structural and biochemical comparison with type II restriction enzymes illustrates how Vsr resembles these endonucleases in overall topology but also how Vsr diverges in terms of the detailed catalytic mechanism. A histidine and two metal–water clusters catalyze the phosphodiester cleavage. The mode of DNA damage recognition is also unique to Vsr. All other structurally characterized DNA damage-binding enzymes employ a nucleotide flipping mechanism for substrate recognition and for catalysis. Vsr, on the other hand, recognizes the TG mismatch as a wobble base pair and penetrates the DNA with three aromatic residues on one side of the mismatch. Thus, Vsr endonuclease provides important counterpoints in our understanding of endonucleolytic mechanisms and of damaged DNA recognition.     

DNA polymerase I-mediated translesion synthesis in RecA-independent DNA interstrand cross-link repair in E. coli

DNA interstrand cross-links (ICLs) are mainly repaired by the combined action of nucleotide excision repair and homologous recombination in E. coli. Genetic data also suggest the existence of a nucleotide excision repair-dependent, homologous recombination-independent ICL repair pathway. The involvement of translesion synthesis in this pathway has been postulated; however, the molecular mechanism of this pathway is not understood. To examine the role of translesion synthesis in ICL repair, we generated a defined substrate with a single psoralen ICL that mimics a postincision structure generated by nucleotide excision repair. We demonstrated that the Klenow fragment (DNA polymerase I) performs translesion synthesis on this model substrate. This in vitro translesion synthesis assay will help in understanding the basic mechanism of a postincision translesion synthesis process in ICL repair.     

Repair of O6-G-alkyl-O6-G interstrand cross-links by human O6-alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase

O (6)-Alkylguanine-DNA alkyltransferase (AGT) plays an important role by protecting cells from alkylating agents. This reduces the frequency of carcinogenesis and mutagenesis initiated by such agents, but AGT also provides a major resistance mechanism to some chemotherapeutic drugs. To improve our understanding of the AGT-mediated repair reaction and our understanding of the spectrum of repairable damage, we have studied the ability of AGT to repair interstrand cross-link DNA damage where the two DNA strands are joined via the guanine- O (6) in each strand. An oligodeoxyribonucleotide containing a heptane cross-link was repaired with initial formation of an AGT-oligo complex and further reaction of a second AGT molecule yielding a hAGT dimer and free oligo. However, an oligodeoxyribonucleotide with a butane cross-link was a very poor substrate for AGT-mediated repair, and only the first reaction that forms an AGT-oligo complex could be detected. Models of the reaction of these substrates in the AGT active site show that the DNA duplex is forced apart locally to repair the first guanine. This reaction is greatly hindered with the butane cross-link, which is mostly buried in the active site pocket and limited in conformational flexibility. This limitation also prevents the adoption of a conformation for the second reaction to repair the AGT-oligo complex. These results are consistent with the postulated mechanism of AGT repair that involves DNA binding and flipping of the substrate nucleotide and indicate that hAGT can repair some types of interstrand cross-link damage.     

Human nucleotide excision repair in vitro: repair of pyrimidine dimers, psoralen and cisplatin adducts by HeLa cell-free extract.

We searched for nucleotide excision repair in human cell-free extracts using two assays: damage-specific incision of DNA (the nicking assay) and damage-stimulated DNA synthesis (the repair synthesis assay). HeLa cell-free extract prepared by the method of Manley et al. (1980) has a weak nicking activity on UV irradiated DNA and the nicking is only slightly reduced when pyrimidine dimers are eliminated from the substrate by DNA photolyase. In contrast to the nicking assay, the extract gives a strong signal with UV irradiated substrate in the repair synthesis assay. The repair synthesis activity is ATP dependent and is reduced by about 50% by prior treatment of the substrate with DNA photolyase indicating that this fraction of repair synthesis is due to removal of pyrimidine dimers by nucleotide excision. Psoralen and cisplatin adducts which are known to be removed by nucleotide excision repair also elicited repair synthesis activity 5-10 fold above the background synthesis. When M13RF DNA containing a uniquely placed psoralen adduct was used in the reaction, complete repair was achieved in a fraction of molecules as evidenced by the restoration of psoralen inactivated KpnI restriction site. This activity is absent in xeroderma pigmentosum group A cells. We conclude that our cell-free extract contains the human nucleotide excision repair enzyme activity.     

Electron microscopic study of (A)BC excinuclease. DNA is sharply bent in the UvrB-DNA complex.

Nucleotide excision repair in Escherichia coli is initiated by the UvrA, UvrB and UvrC proteins. UvrA is the damage recognition subunit, makes an A2B1 complex with the targeting subunit UvrB, and the complex binds to the lesion site; UvrA dissociates leaving behind a very stable UvrB-DNA complex that is recognized by the trigger subunit, UvrC, and the ensuing UvrB-UvrC heterodimer makes two incisions, one on either side of the lesion. Using electron microscopy, we investigated the structures of these early A, A-B intermediates on DNA containing ultraviolet light photoproducts. UvrA, which is known to bind to DNA as a dimer and produce a DNase I footprint of 33 base-pairs does not change the trajectory of DNA appreciably. The A2B1 complex clearly shows a bipartite structure and its effect on the trajectory of the DNA was not consistently straight or kinked. In contrast, the DNA in the preincision UvrB-DNA complex appears to be severely kinked; 43% of the molecules are bent by 80 degrees or more, with an average bending angle of 127 degrees. It appears that protein-induced bending is an important step on the pathway leading to excision of the damaged nucleotide by (A)BC excinuclease.     

Structure and mechanism for DNA lesion recognition

A fundamental question in DNA repair is how a lesion is detected when embedded in millions to billions of normal base pairs. Extensive structural and functional studies reveal atomic details of DNA repair protein and nucleic acid interactions. This review summarizes seemingly diverse structural motifs used in lesion recognition and suggests a general mechanism to recognize DNA lesion by the poor base stacking. After initial recognition of this shared structural feature of lesions, different DNA repair pathways use unique verification mechanisms to ensure correct lesion identification and removal.