Relationship of CA 125 and CA 19.9 with lung carcinoma histological subtype: preliminary study

The aim of this work was to study the possible utility of simultaneous determination of CA 125 and CA 19.9 in patients with lung cancer. Serum levels of both markers were studied in 87 patients without metastases (Mo), 72 patients with distant metastases (MT) and 15 cases without clinical evidence of disease after primary treatment (NED). Sixty-five tumors were epidermoid, 34 were adenocarcinomas, 24 were cell undifferentiated carcinomas and 51 were small-cell carcinomas. Sera from 75 healthy subjects and 20 patients with benign lung disease were used as controls. The cut-off values used were 35 and 37 U/ml for CA 125 and CA 19.9, respectively. CA 125 and CA 19.9 serum levels were within normal limits in all control patients. In NED patients these markers were not elevated, except in one with chronic liver disease who showed elevated CA 19.9 (76 U/ml). Twenty-five percent of Mo lung cancer patients and 40.3% of MT cases had CA 19.9 over 37 U/ml. Abnormally high levels of CA 125 were found in 18.7% and 22.9% of Mo and MT patients, respectively. Sixty percent of patients with large cell undifferentiated carcinoma had elevated CA 125 (mean 176 U/ml) compared to 15.4% of patients with all other histological types of tumors combined (54.3 U/ml, p less than 0.01). CA 19.9 serum levels were also more often elevated in patients with large cell undifferentiated carcinomas (50%, 7/14 cases) than in other histological types (30%, 36/120 patients), but the difference was not statistically significant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

CA 125 in biological fluids

CA 125 is not a specific tumor marker, and is synthesized by normal and malignant cells of different origin (mainly in tissues derived from the müllerian epithelia) in a similar proportion. Abnormal CA 125 levels may be found in fluids of different origin (ascites, pleura, pericardium, amniotic fluid, cyst fluid, bronchoalveolar fluid, etc.) and in serum from patients with these fluids. Differences in serum CA 125 found in malignant or benign diseases may be related to the number of cells that synthesize the marker, and are highly dependent on the access to serum, where the marker is normally determined. Moreover, CA 125 is a very good tumor marker in ovarian and lung cancer. The sensitivity of CA 125 in ovarian cancer is related to stage (40-95%), histological type (lower levels in mucinous adenocarcinoma), and the marker is useful in the early detection of recurrence (sensitivity 80%) and in therapy monitoring. It's sensitivity in lung cancer is lower than in ovarian cancer, 39% in locoregional malignancies and 69% in metastatic disease, but clearly related to stage and histology (mainly in adenocarcinomas and large cell lung cancer) and it is useful in prognosis and disease monitoring.     

Analytical and clinical evaluation of a new tumor marker in breast cancer: CA 27.29.

Evaluation of a radioimmunoassay for a new tumor marker, named CA 27.29, recently proposed for use in breast cancer patients, is reported in this study. After considering the analytical performance, the clinical study was directed to a control group of 66 apparently healthy subjects (Controls), a group of 25 women with benign breast disease (BBD) and a group of 164 breast cancer patients divided into primary before any treatment (M-), in follow-up with no evidence of disease (NED) and presence of metastases (M+). When compared to CA 15.3, our results showed similar sensitivity of both markers with a slightly lower specificity for CA 27.29. In some cases, however, CA 27.29 elevation appears earlier than CA 15.3 as a sign of metastases. We thus propose their associated use.     

Clinical evaluation of a new two-site assay for CA125 antigen

As appropriate surgery and chemotherapy can improve both quality of life and survival of patients with ovarian adenocarcinoma, there has been a pressing need for "serodiagnostic" assays to enable close patient monitoring. CA 125 antigen has previously been described as a useful tumor marker of ovarian cancer. This is the first clinical evaluation of a radioimmunoassay using two new monoclonal antibodies, B27.1 and B43.13, that react with separate sites on the glycoprotein marker CA 125. Using the new assay, the majority of patients with clinically or radiologically detectable disease had serum CA 125 antigen levels well above the upper limit seen with random apparently healthy donors, while only three patients who were believed free of disease had elevated levels. Disease progression was associated with increasing values of serum CA 125 antigen, while response to therapy was associated with a steady decline in serum CA 125 antigen levels. Seven patients had steadily rising serum CA 125 antigen levels after initially having normal levels. The mean lead time between rise above normal and clinical or radiological evidence of relapse was 5 months (range 2 to 12 months). The merits of further surgical intervention are illustrated by the serial values of two patients followed after chemotherapy. The assay appears to have value in monitoring response to therapy and in detecting disease relapse at a time when appropriate therapeutic intervention is still possible or likely to be beneficial. Furthermore, monitoring CA 125 antigen was shown to be of benefit in assessing response to chemotherapy in a few patients with metastatic adenocarcinoma of unknown primary, and may be useful in this group of patients in determining those likely to benefit from aggressive chemotherapy.     

CA 125: the past and the future

Over the last 15 years, substantial progress has been made in understanding the potential and the limitations of the CA 125 assay. More than 2000 papers have been published concerning laboratory and clinical studies of CA 125. The original CA 125 assay utilized the OC 125 antibody that recognizes the CA 125 epitope on a high molecular weight glycoprotein. Despite repeated attempts, the gene encoding the peptide component has not yet been cloned. Monoclonal antibodies have been raised against other epitopes expressed by this molecule, leading to the development of the CA 125-II assay that exhibits less day-to-day variation. Using either assay, elevated levels of CA 125 are detected in a number of benign conditions, including endometriosis. CA 125 is most consistently elevated in epithelial ovarian cancer, but can be expressed in a number of gynecologic (endometrial, fallopian tube) and non-gynecologic (pancreatic, breast, colon and lung) cancers. The best established application of the CA 125 assay is in monitoring ovarian cancer. The rate of decline in CA 125 during primary chemotherapy has been an important independent prognostic factor in several multivariate analyses. Persistent elevation of CA 125 at the time of a second look surgical surveillance procedure predicts residual disease with > 95% specificity. Rising CA 125 values have preceded clinical detection of recurrent disease by at least 3 months in most, but not all studies. Given the modest activity of salvage chemotherapy, this information has not yet impacted on survival. Rising CA 125 during subsequent chemotherapy has been associated with progressive disease in more than 90% of cases. CA 125 may serve as an effective surrogate marker for clinical response in phase II trials of new drugs. CA 125 levels can aid in distinguishing malignant from benign pelvic masses, permitting effective triage of patients for primary surgery. Early detection of ovarian cancer remains the most promising application of CA 125. An algorithm has been developed that estimates the risk of ovarian cancer (ROC) based upon the level and trend of CA 125 values. A major trial has been initiated that uses the ROC algorithm to trigger transvaginal sonography and/or subsequent laparotomy. Such a trial could demonstrate improvement in survival through early detection. This strategy should provide adequate specificity, but sensitivity for early stage disease may not be optimal. In the future, improved sensitivity may be attained using multiple markers and neural network analysis. Most serum tumor markers have been proteins or carbohydrates, but lipid markers such as lysophosphatidic acid deserve evaluation. Genomic and proteonomic technologies should identify additional novel markers.     

Tissue quantification of CA 125 in epithelial ovarian cancer.

The objectives of this study were the determination of CA 125 in the cytosol of healthy and carcinomatous ovarian tissue by immunoanalysis, analysis of its correlation with the biological characteristics of ovarian carcinoma, determination of serum CA 125 levels, and study of the prognostic value of the marker in cytosol. The levels of the marker depend not only on the tumor's production rate, so its determination in tissue can indicate more accurately if the tumor is a producer of the marker and establish its value for the prognosis of the disease. Determination of CA 125 in tissue was performed by immunoanalysis in 50 ovarian epithelial cancer samples, 13 benign pathology samples and 32 healthy ovary samples. The presurgical serum level of the marker was also obtained. The correlation between the CA 125 level in the cytosol and the different biological characteristics of the ovarian carcinoma, the serum levels of the marker and survival were analyzed. The CA 125 level proved to be higher in malignant tissue (p < 0.0001). There was a significant association between the tissue marker and histological type (high CA 125 was associated with serous and endometrioid tumors) and between the marker and survival. No relation with stage was found. There was a correlation between the CA 125 level in the cytosol and serum both variables being dependent, with a correlation coefficient of 0.44. This good correlation speaks in favor of the usefulness of CA 125 determination in serum in the follow-up of ovarian cancer. Tumors having high tissue expression of CA 125 were found to have a double relative risk of death, independently of tumor stage.     

Tumour associated antigens CA 15.3 and CA 125 in ovarian cancer

CA 125 and CA 15.3 antigens were determined by enzyme immunoassay in 78 patients with ovarian cancer for a total of 540 determinations. The antigens were also investigated in sera from 100 women with other gynaecological diseases, 82 lung cancer patients and in 39 pleural fluids of varying origin. CA 15.3 reference values were evaluated in 91 healthy women (cut-off: 25 U/ml). CA 15.3 sensitivity at diagnosis (60%) and for detecting relapse (44%) was lower than that of CA 125 (90% and 64.7%, respectively). However, CA 15.3 does not increase with aspecific mesothelial cell reaction and thus it is more specific than CA 125. Combined use of the markers during follow-up improves early detection of relapse (at least one of the two was positive in 79% of cases). Therefore both CA 15.3 and CA 125 should be routinely determined for the detection and monitoring of ovarian cancer.     

The potential value of CA125 as a tumour marker in small volume, non-evaluable epithelial ovarian cancer.

Seventy four consecutive patients with epithelial ovarian cancer have been followed up longitudinally with serial serum CA125 for up to 48 months. From this database, the CA125 changes in small volume disease have been evaluated. For long term complete responders (n = 12), the mean plateau level of CA125 was 7.2 U/ml (95% confidence interval; 5.6 to 9.2 U/ml). The natural half-life of CA125 at 5.1 days (range 3.8 to 7 days) was calculated from five patients with Stage I and II disease who underwent complete surgical excision. A mean lead time of 99 days (range 14 to 255 days) was demonstrated between marker detection of disease progression and clinically apparent progressive disease in 12 out of 13 patients (92%) who relapsed after chemotherapy induced complete remission. The threshold of tumour volume detection with CA125 is unlikely to be determined by an arbitrary cut-off level. The kinetics of CA125 provide more useful information and the potential to define complete response or indeed cure with CA125 parameters requires further investigation.     

CA19-9、CA125、CEA及Ferritin联合检测诊断非小细胞肺癌脑、骨转移的临床价值研究

目的:研究CA19-9、CA125、癌胚抗原(CEA)以及铁蛋白(Ferritin)四种肿瘤标志物联合检测用于诊断非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑或(和)骨转移的临床价值。方法:选取2011年5月至2012年5月于我院就诊的NSCLC患者184例。将发现脑或(和)骨转移者归为转移组,共96例;将未发现脑、骨转移者归为无转移组,共88例,采用电化学发光免疫分析法测定各组患者血清中CA19-9、CA125、CEA以及Ferritin的水平,探讨其在NSCLC患者脑或(和)骨转移中的诊断效能。结果:在发生脑或(和)骨转移的NSCLC患者中,CA19-9、CA125、CEA及Ferritin四种肿瘤标志物的水平和阳性率均显著高于未发生骨、脑转移的患者。ROC曲线分析显示,以上四种肿瘤标志物对诊断NSCLC骨或(和)脑转移的敏感度分别为73.48%、69.13%、66.35%和61.34%;特异度分别为80.02%、32.51%、65.11%和62.58%;将四种肿瘤标志物联合进行诊断的敏感度和特异度分别为91.21%和88.64%,显著高于单一标志物诊断。结论:发生脑或(和)骨转移的NSCLC患者血清中CA19-9、CA125、CEA以及Ferritin四种肿瘤标志物水平均显著升高,以上标志物联合检测可提高NSCLC患者脑或(和)骨转移的诊断效能,可作为早期诊断NSCLC患者脑或(和)骨转移的辅助检测指标。     

Carcinoembryonic antigen and breast carcinoma antigen (CA 15.3) in preoperative staging and postoperative monitoring of patients with carcinoma of the breast

Serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and breast carcinoma antigen (CA 15.3) were determined in patients with breast carcinoma: in 129 before initial surgical or nonsurgical treatment and in 134 afterwards. Before any initial treatment, CEA was elevated in 15% of patients with Stage IV disease and CA 15.3 was high in 11% with Stage III and 48% with Stage IV. While monitoring management active disease was associated with elevated serum CEA in 66% of the patients, with elevated CA 15.3 in 73% and with at least one of the markers elevated in 86%. Both tests had high specificity (93% and 98%). The rise in serum CEA and, even more so, of serum CA 15.3 roughly paralleled the increase in bulk of the tumor: from locoregional disease through metastases to the lungs, bones, lungs with bones, and liver. Decreases in the levels of serum CEA and CA 15.3 reflected response to therapy, increases in the level of at least one marker-treatment failure, and levels fluctuating above the normal range indicated stationary disease. During follow-up, the predictive value of a negative test (levels within the normal range), suggesting that the patient might be free of disease, was 61% for CEA alone, 67% for CA 15.3 alone, and 80% for the two tests combined. We conclude that an elevated serum level of only one of the markers was useful for staging, implying advanced disease. Determination of both markers jointly was useful for monitoring the effectiveness of the therapy and for follow-up aimed at detection of relapse.     

Comparison of prolactin, CA 15-3 and TPA in breast carcinomas

Circulating prolactin, CA 15-3 and TPA were assayed pre-therapeutically and sequentially thereafter from 68 breast cancer patients attending the Gujarat Cancer and Research Institute, Ahmedabad--a regional cancer institute in Western India. The three marker values were correlated with the stage, histologic grade and disease status. At least one of the markers was elevated in 82% of patients. CA 15-3 and TPA levels were elevated with the advancement of stage. Prolactin levels were high in poorly differentiated tumors of pre-menopausal patients. The disease status was effectively reflected by the levels of prolactin and CA 15-3. TPA showed high false positivity so was of no use as an indicator of disease status. Recurrence could be predicted early, with a lead time of 3-6 months using prolactin and CA 15-3.     

Clinical evaluation of the simultaneous determination of CA 15-3, CA 125 and sHER2 in breast cancer

Objective We investigated serum levels of CA 15-3, sHER2 and CA 125, and their usefulness in the detection of metastatic disease in breast cancer patients.

Methods The levels of CA 15-3, sHER2 and CA 125 tumour markers were determined in 60 patients, 40 with localized and 20 with metastatic breast carcinoma. The control group consisted of 10 healthy women.

Results We found that, at the time of diagnosis, serum levels of all three tumour markers were elevated in patients with distant metastases, but of minute importance in the detection of any breast cancer. When the data for the individual markers were combined the overall sensitivity of metastases detection with all three markers improved. In this regard, 90% of patients with distant metastases had an increase in serum level of at least one of tested tumour markers. Similar results were obtained using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Moreover, using ROC we defined cut-off values for metastasis detection for each of the tested markers.

Conclusion Our findings indicate that measurement of CA 15-3 serum values in conjunction with sHER2 and CA 15-3 can increase sensitivity in metastasis detection.     

DR-70~(TM)和CA50肺癌免疫测定的应用价值

目的 :评价DR 70 TM和CA5 0两种肿瘤标志物在肺癌检测中的价值。方法 :应用DR 70 TMELISA和CA5 0IRMA对77例肺癌患者 ,42例健康者及 48例其它肺癌者进行对照检测。结果 :各组DR 70 TMCA5 0测定值比例显示肺癌组平均值显著其它两组 (P <0 .0 1)。DR 70 TM检测的敏感性和有效性高于CA5 0检测 (83.1%比 6 6 .2 % ,85 .7%比 75 .6 % )。两项联合检测的敏感性 ,有效性分别为 96 .1% ,93.1% ,优于单项DR 70 TM 检测的 83.1% ,85 .7% ,及CA5 0的 6 6 .2 9%、75 .6 %。结论 :DR 70 TM在肺癌检测中有较大应用价值。DR 70 TM 和CA5 0两项联合检测是较理想的肺癌检测组合     

Clinical evaluation of the simultaneous determination of CA 15-3, CA 125 and sHER2 in breast cancer

Objective We investigated serum levels of CA 15-3, sHER2 and CA 125, and their usefulness in the detection of metastatic disease in breast cancer patients.

Methods The levels of CA 15-3, sHER2 and CA 125 tumour markers were determined in 60 patients, 40 with localized and 20 with metastatic breast carcinoma. The control group consisted of 10 healthy women.

Results We found that, at the time of diagnosis, serum levels of all three tumour markers were elevated in patients with distant metastases, but of minute importance in the detection of any breast cancer. When the data for the individual markers were combined the overall sensitivity of metastases detection with all three markers improved. In this regard, 90% of patients with distant metastases had an increase in serum level of at least one of tested tumour markers. Similar results were obtained using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC). Moreover, using ROC we defined cut-off values for metastasis detection for each of the tested markers.

Conclusion Our findings indicate that measurement of CA 15-3 serum values in conjunction with sHER2 and CA 15-3 can increase sensitivity in metastasis detection.     

Serum levels and thyroid tissue expression of CA50 and CA 19-9 in patients with thyroid tumor.

A 77-year-old man was admitted to the hospital with a thyroid nodule. The levels of serum tumor-associated carbohydrate antigens (CA 50, CA 19-9) and thyroglobulin (HTG) were markedly increased. We performed total thyroidectomy and right neck lymph node dissection. After treatment, the serum CA 50, CA 19-9 and HTG levels were markedly decreased. Histological examination of the thyroid tumor showed papillary adenocarcinoma and the dissected neck lymph nodes contained metastatic adenocarcinoma. The expression of CA 50 and CA 19-9 (defined by the monoclonal antibodies) was studied by immunoperoxidase staining from the normal and carcinomatous thyroid tissues and the dissected neck lymph node. CA 50 was expressed more strongly by the carcinoma cells than CA 19-9. The positive rates for serum CA 50 and CA 19-9 levels in other patients with papillary adenocarcinoma were not significantly higher compared with patients with benign nodules and normal subjects. But a significant positive correlation was found between the diameter of the carcinoma and the serum levels of CA 50 and CA 19-9. These results suggest that the serum levels of CA 50 and CA 19-9 might not become useful markers for diagnosing carcinoma of the thyroid, but might be useful markers for monitoring the growth or recurrence of papillary adenocarcinoma of the thyroid in patients with high serum levels of CA 50 and CA 19-9.     

Comparison of CA 15-3 and CEA in diagnosis and monitoring of breast cancer

In order to assess the utility of the tumor-associated antigen CA15-3 in the diagnosis of breast cancer, this new tumor marker was measured pre-operatively in 1342 patients. This group comprised 509 patients with malignant disease (134 with breast cancer and 375 with other malignancies not involving the breast) and 833 patients with benign surgical diseases (95 patients with fibroadenoma of the breast, 738 with other benign diseases). The results were compared with those for carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in the diagnosis of breast cancer. CA15-3 was above the normal limits of 25 U/ml in 31% of the patients with breast cancer, in 22% of patients with other malignancies, and in 9% of patients with benign diseases. CEA was elevated in 26% of patients with breast cancer (greater than 3 ng/ml). CA15-3 levels were above 50 U/ml in 13% of the breast cancer patients, in 6% of patients with other malignancies, and in 0.2% of the patients with benign diseases. There was a good correlation between CA15-3 level and tumor stage in breast cancer. CA15-3 serum levels were over 50 U/ml in respectively 0%, 2%, 13%, and 73% of the patients with stages I, II, III, and IV. CA15-3 and CEA were also determined in 671 patients who had received initial curative surgery of breast cancer, and who regularly attended our follow-up clinic. CA15-3 was found to be more sensitive than CEA in detecting recurrences of breast cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Significance of CA72.4 in patients with colorectal cancer. Comparison with CEA and CA19.9.

CA72.4 is a new tumor-associated antigen identified by monoclonal antibodies cc49 and B72.3. Serum levels of CA72.4 were measured in patients with benign and malignant diseases. The cut-off used was 4 U/mL. CA72.4 is a highly specific marker since only 3% of 162 patients with benign diseases had elevated levels of antigen. Forty-four percent of 89 patients with colorectal cancer had elevated CA72.4 levels. Compared with CEA and CA19.9, we have found that CEA (75%) is the most sensitive marker (p less than 0.001). The simultaneous use of two or three markers did not further contribute to the evaluation of patients with colorectal cancer.     

Review of clinical studies of CA 27.29 in breast cancer management.

A critical review of CA 27.29 and CA 15-3 is performed in this paper. A review of the literature is undertaken. A review of the FDA submissions for 27.29 for both early stage and monitoring metastatic breast cancer patients is reviewed.     

肺癌患者血清CEA，CA19-9，CA125 及CA153 围手术期动态监测的临床 意义

目的:探讨动态监测肺癌患者围手术期血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125及CA153水平变化的临床意义。方法:随机选取2014年5月至2015年5月收治的肺癌患者58例为研究对象,另选取同期在我院接受体检的健康人群15例为对照组。分别测定肺癌患者手术前及术后1天、1周、1个月、3个月的血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、CA153水平,并与对照组的上述各血清肿瘤标志物进行比较。结果:肺癌患者术前空腹血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、CA153水平明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.01)。肺癌患者术后1天、1周、1个月及3个月的血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、CA153水平明显低于术前,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。肺癌患者术后1个月的平均空腹血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、CA153水平高于术后3个月平均水平,但差异不具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对肺癌患者的血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、CA153水平进行围手术期动态监测有助于评估手术治疗效果。     

CA 72-4 compared with CEA and CA 19-9 as a marker of some gastrointestinal malignancies

The objective of this study was to compare CA 72-4 with CEA and CA 19-9 in gastrointestinal malignancies. CA 72-4 was assayed by radioimmunoassay and CEA and CA 19-9 with the Abbott IMx analyser. The study included 52 patients with gastrointestinal cancer and 20 controls with benign gastrointestinal diseases. The 52 cases showed marker sensitivities of 39%, 49% and 35% for CA 72-4, CEA and CA 19-9, respectively, and 64% when the markers were combined. Marker expression in serum was highest in colorectal carcinoma followed by gastric and esophageal carcinoma. The sensitivities of the individual markers in colorectal, gastric and esophageal carcinomas, respectively, were: CA 72-4, 56%, 32% and 18%; CEA, 83%, 33% and 18%; CA 19-9, 53%, 25% and 18%. The sensitivity of the three markers in combination was 89%, 50% and 46% in colorectal, gastric and esophageal cancer, respectively. The specificity of CA 72-4, CEA and CA 19-9 was 100%, 72% and 86%, respectively. However, CA 72-4 is not a useful a marker for gastrointestinal cancers because of its poor sensitivity. CEA, which had the best overall sensitivity and a reasonable specificity, was the most useful single marker, especially for colorectal cancer. Whereas the single markers were not useful in gastric and esophageal cancer, the combination of the three may be.