Isolation and Characterization of Rhodobacter capsulatus Mutants Affected in Cytochrome cbb3 Oxidase Activity

The facultative phototrophic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus contains only one form of cytochrome (cyt) c oxidase, which has recently been identified as a cbb₃-type cyt c oxidase. This is unlike other related species, such as Rhodobacter sphaeroides and Paracoccus denitrificans, which contain an additional mitochondrial-like aa₃-type cyt c oxidase. An extensive search for mutants affected in cyt c oxidase activity in R. capsulatus led to the isolation of at least five classes of mutants. Plasmids complementing them to a wild-type phenotype were obtained for all but one of these classes from a chromosomal DNA library. The first class of mutants contained mutations within the structural genes (ccoNOQP) of the cyt cbb₃ oxidase. Sequence analysis of these mutants and of the plasmids complementing them revealed that ccoNOQP in R. capsulatus is not flanked by the oxygen response regulator fnr, which is located upstream of these genes in other species. Genetic and biochemical characterizations of mutants belonging to this group indicated that the subunits CcoN, CcoO, and CcoP are required for the presence of an active cyt cbb₃ oxidase, and unlike in Bradyrhizobium japonicum, no active CcoN-CcoO subcomplex was found in R. capsulatus. In addition, mutagenesis experiments indicated that the highly conserved open reading frame 277 located adjacent to ccoNOQP is required neither for cyt cbb₃ oxidase activity or assembly nor for respiratory or photosynthetic energy transduction in R. capsulatus. The remaining cyt c oxidase-minus mutants mapped outside of ccoNOQP and formed four additional groups. In one of these groups, a fully assembled but inactive cyt cbb₃ oxidase was found, while another group had only extremely small amounts of it. The next group was characterized by a pleiotropic effect on all membrane-bound c-type cytochromes, and the remaining mutants not complemented by the plasmids complementing the first four groups formed at least one additional group affecting the biogenesis of the cyt cbb₃ oxidase of R. capsulatus.The gram-negative facultative photosynthetic bacterium Rhodobacter capsulatus has a highly branched electron transport chain, resulting in its ability to grow under a wide variety of conditions (52). Its light-driven photosynthetic electron transfer pathway is a cyclic process between the photochemical reaction center and the ubihydroquinone cytochrome (cyt) c oxidoreductase (cyt bc₁ complex) (30). On the other hand, the respiratory electron transfer pathways of R. capsulatus are branched after the quinone pool and contain two different terminal oxidases, previously called cyt b₄₁₀ (cyt c oxidase) and cyt b₂₆₀ (quinol oxidase) (3, 27, 29, 53). The branch involving cyt c oxidase is similar to the mitochondrial electron transfer chain in that it depends on the cyt bc₁ complex and a c-type cyt acting as an electron carrier. The quinol oxidase branch circumvents the cyt bc₁ complex and the cyt c oxidase by taking electrons directly from the quinone pool to reduce O₂ to H₂O. The pronounced metabolic versatility, including the ability to grow under dark, anaerobic conditions (50, 52), makes these purple non-sulfur bacteria excellent model organisms for studying microbial energy transduction.Marrs and Gest (29) have reported the first R. capsulatus mutants which were defective in the respiratory electron transport chain. Of these mutants, M5 was incapable of catalyzing the α-naphthol plus N′,N′-dimethyl-p-phenylenediamine (DMPD) plus O₂→indophenol blue plus H₂O reaction (NADI reaction) and unable to grow by respiration (Res⁻), and hence was deficient in both terminal oxidases. Another mutant, M4, was also NADI⁻ but Res⁺ due to the presence of an active quinol oxidase. Marrs and Gest have also described two different spontaneous revertants of M5, called M6 and M7, which regained the ability to grow by respiration (29). M6 regained cyt c oxidase activity and became concurrently NADI⁺ and sensitive to low concentrations of cyanide and the cyt bc₁ inhibitor myxothiazol, but remained quinol oxidase⁻. On the other hand, M7 regained the quinol oxidase activity but remained cyt c oxidase⁻ (thus, NADI⁻ and resistant to myxothiazol, a phenotype identical to that of M4). All of these mutants remained proficient for phototrophic (Ps) growth.The cyt c oxidase of R. capsulatus has been purified previously and characterized as being a novel cbb₃-type cyt c oxidase without a Cu_A center (15). It is composed of at least a membrane-integral b-type cyt (subunit I [CcoN]) with a low-spin heme b and a high-spin heme b₃-Cu_B binuclear center, and two membrane-anchored c-type cyts (CcoO and CcoP). It has a unique active site that possibly confers a very high affinity for its substrate oxygen (49). The structural genes of this enzyme (ccoNOQP) have been sequenced recently from R. capsulatus 37b4 (45) and aligned to the partial amino acid sequence of the purified enzyme from R. capsulatus MT1131 (15). Although a ccoN mutant of strain 37b4 was reported to lack cyt c oxidase activity (45), the observed discrepancies between the amino acid sequence and the nucleotide sequence do not entirely exclude the possible presence of two similar cb-type cyt c oxidases in this species. The presence of a similar cyt c oxidase has also been demonstrated in several other bacteria, including P. denitrificans (9), R. sphaeroides (13), and Rhizobium spp. In the latter species, the homologs of ccoNOQP have been named fixNOQP (23, 34) and are required to support respiration under oxygen-limited growth during symbiotic nitrogen fixation (36).The biogenesis of a multisubunit protein complex containing several prosthetic groups, such as cyt cbb₃ oxidase, is likely to require many accessory proteins involved in various posttranslational events, including protein translocation, assembly, cofactor insertion, and maturation (46). Thus, insights into this important biological process, about which currently little is known, may be gained by searching for mutants defective in cyt c oxidase activity. In this work, we describe the isolation of such mutants and their molecular genetic characterization, including those already available, such as M4, M5, and M7G. These studies indicate that in R. capsulatus, gene products of at least five different loci are involved in the formation of an active cyt cbb₃ oxidase.     

Contribution of Flavin Covalent Linkage with Histidine 99 to the Reaction Catalyzed by Choline Oxidase

The FAD-dependent choline oxidase has a flavin cofactor covalently attached to the protein via histidine 99 through an 8α-N(3)-histidyl linkage. The enzyme catalyzes the four-electron oxidation of choline to glycine betaine, forming betaine aldehyde as an enzyme-bound intermediate. The variant form of choline oxidase in which the histidine residue has been replaced with asparagine was used to investigate the contribution of the 8α-N(3)-histidyl linkage of FAD to the protein toward the reaction catalyzed by the enzyme. Decreases of 10-fold and 30-fold in the k_cat/K_m and k_cat values were observed as compared with wild-type choline oxidase at pH 10 and 25 °C, with no significant effect on k_cat/K_O using choline as substrate. Both the k_cat/K_m and k_cat values increased with increasing pH to limiting values at high pH consistent with the participation of an unprotonated group in the reductive half-reaction and the overall turnover of the enzyme. The pH independence of both ^D(k_cat/K_m) and ^Dk_cat, with average values of 9.2 ± 3.3 and 7.4 ± 0.5, respectively, is consistent with absence of external forward and reverse commitments to catalysis, and the chemical step of CH bond cleavage being rate-limiting for both the reductive half-reaction and the overall enzyme turnover. The temperature dependence of the ^Dk_red values suggests disruption of the preorganization in the asparagine variant enzyme. Altogether, the data presented in this study are consistent with the FAD-histidyl covalent linkage being important for the optimal positioning of the hydride ion donor and acceptor in the tunneling reaction catalyzed by choline oxidase.A number of enzymes, including dehydrogenases (1–3), monooxygenases (4–7), halogenases (8–11), and oxidases (7, 12, 13), employ flavin cofactors (FAD or FMN) for their catalytic processes. About a tenth of all flavoproteins have been shown to contain a covalently attached cofactor, which may be linked at the C8M position via histidyl, tyrosyl, or cysteinyl side chains or at the C6M position via a cysteinyl side chain (14). Glucooligosaccharide oxidase (15, 16), hexose oxidase (17), and berberine bridge enzyme (18, 19) are examples of flavoproteins (FAD as cofactor) with both linkages present in one flavin molecule. The covalent linkages in flavin-dependent enzymes have been shown to stabilize protein structure (20–22), prevent loss of loosely bound flavin cofactors (23), modulate the redox potential of the flavin microenvironment (20, 23–27), facilitate electron transfer reactions (28), and contribute to substrate binding as in the case of the cysteinyl linkage (20). However, no study has implicated a mechanistic role of the flavin covalent linkages in enzymatic reactions in which a hydride ion is transferred by quantum mechanical tunneling.The discovery of quantum mechanical tunneling in enzymatic reactions, in which hydrogen atoms, protons, and hydride ions are transferred, has attracted considerable interest in enzyme studies geared toward understanding the mechanisms underlying the several orders of magnitudes in the rate enhancements of protein-catalyzed reactions compared with non-enzymatic ones. Tunneling mechanisms have been shown in a wide array of cofactor-dependent enzymes, including flavoenzymes. Examples of flavoenzymes in which the tunneling mechanisms have been demonstrated include morphinone reductase (29, 30), pentaerythritol tetranitrate reductase (29), glucose oxidase (31–33), and choline oxidase (34). Mechanistic data on Class 2 dihydroorotate dehydrogenases, also with a flavin cofactor (FMN) covalently linked to the protein moiety (35, 36), could only propose a mechanism that is either stepwise or concerted with significant quantum mechanical tunneling for the hydride transfer from C6 and the deprotonation at C5 in the oxidation of dihydroorotate to orotate (37). This leaves choline oxidase as the only characterized enzyme with a covalently attached flavin cofactor (12, 38), where the oxidation of its substrate occurs unequivocally by quantum mechanical tunneling.Choline oxidase from Arthrobacter globiformis catalyzes the two-step FAD-dependent oxidation of the primary alcohol substrate choline to glycine betaine with betaine aldehyde, which is predominantly bound to the enzyme and forms a gem-diol species, as intermediate (Scheme 1). Glycine betaine accumulates in the cytoplasm of plants and bacteria as a defensive mechanism against stress conditions, thus making genetic engineering of relevant plants of economic interest (39–45), and the biosynthetic pathway for the osmolyte is a potential drug target in human microbial infections of clinical interest (46–48). The first oxidation step catalyzed by choline oxidase involves the transfer of a hydride ion from a deprotonated choline to the protein-bound flavin followed by reaction of the anionic flavin hydroquinone with molecular oxygen to regenerate the oxidized FAD (for a recent review see Ref. 50). The gem-diol choline, i.e. hydrated betaine aldehyde, is the substrate for the second oxidation step (49), suggesting that the reaction may follow a similar mechanism. The isoalloxazine ring of the flavin cofactor, which is buried within the protein, is physically constrained through a covalent linkage via the C(8) methyl of the flavin and the N(3) atom of the histidine side chain at position 99 (Fig. 1) (12). Also contributing to the physical constrain are the proximity of Ile-103 to the pyrimidine ring and the interactions of the backbone atoms of residues His-99 through Ile-103 with the isoalloxazine ring. The rigid positioning of the isoalloxazine ring could only permit a solvent-excluded cavity of ∼125 ų adjacent to the re face of the FAD to accommodate a 93-ų choline molecule in the substrate binding domain (12). Mechanistic data thus far obtained on choline oxidase, coupled with the crystal structure of the wild-type enzyme resolved to 1.86 Å, are consistent with a quantum tunneling mechanism for the hydride ion transfer occurring within a highly preorganized enzyme-substrate complex (Scheme 2) (12, 34, 50). Exploitation of the tunneling mechanism requires minimal independent movement of the hydride ion donor and acceptor, with the only dynamic motions permitted being the ones that promote the hydride transfer reaction.Open in a separate windowSCHEME 1.Two-step, four-electron oxidation of choline catalyzed by choline oxidase.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.x-ray crystal structure of the active site of wild-type choline oxidase resolved to 1.86 Å (PDB 2jbv). Note the significant distortion of the flavin ring at the C(4a) atom, which is due to the presence of a C(4a) adduct (69).Open in a separate windowSCHEME 2.The hydride ion transfer reaction from the α-carbon of the activated choline alkoxide species to the N(5) atom of the isoalloxazine ring of the enzyme-bound flavin in choline oxidase.In the present study, the contribution of the physically constrained flavin isoalloxazine ring to the reaction catalyzed by choline oxidase has been investigated in a variant enzyme in which the histidine residue at position 99 was replaced with an asparagine. The results suggest that, although not being required per se, the covalent linkage in choline oxidase contributes to the hydride tunneling reaction by either preventing independent movement or contributing to the optimal positioning of the flavin acting as hydride ion acceptor with respect to the alkoxide species acting as a donor. However, the covalent linkage is not required for the reaction.     

Loop 2 Structure in Glycine and GABAA Receptors Plays a Key Role in Determining Ethanol Sensitivity

The present study tests the hypothesis that the structure of extracellular domain Loop 2 can markedly affect ethanol sensitivity in glycine receptors (GlyRs) and γ-aminobutyric acid type A receptors (GABA_ARs). To test this, we mutated Loop 2 in the α1 subunit of GlyRs and in the γ subunit of α1β2γ2GABA_ARs and measured the sensitivity of wild type and mutant receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes to agonist, ethanol, and other agents using two-electrode voltage clamp. Replacing Loop 2 of α1GlyR subunits with Loop 2 from the δGABA_AR (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit, reduced ethanol threshold and increased the degree of ethanol potentiation without altering general receptor function. Similarly, replacing Loop 2 of the γ subunit of GABA_ARs with δL2 shifted the ethanol threshold from 50 mm in WT to 1 mm in the GABA_A γ-δL2 mutant. These findings indicate that the structure of Loop 2 can profoundly affect ethanol sensitivity in GlyRs and GABA_ARs. The δL2 mutations did not affect GlyR or GABA_AR sensitivity, respectively, to Zn²⁺ or diazepam, which suggests that these δL2-induced changes in ethanol sensitivity do not extend to all allosteric modulators and may be specific for ethanol or ethanol-like agents. To explore molecular mechanisms underlying these results, we threaded the WT and δL2 GlyR sequences onto the x-ray structure of the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric ligand-gated ion channel homologue (GLIC). In addition to being the first GlyR model threaded on GLIC, the juxtaposition of the two structures led to a possible mechanistic explanation for the effects of ethanol on GlyR-based on changes in Loop 2 structure.Alcohol abuse and dependence are significant problems in our society, with ∼14 million people in the United States being affected (1, 2). Alcohol causes over 100,000 deaths in the United States, and alcohol-related issues are estimated to cost nearly 200 billion dollars annually (2). To address this, considerable attention has focused on the development of medications to prevent and treat alcohol-related problems (3–5). The development of such medications would be aided by a clear understanding of the molecular structures on which ethanol acts and how these structures influence receptor sensitivity to ethanol.Ligand-gated ion channels (LGICs)² have received substantial attention as putative sites of ethanol action that cause its behavioral effects (6–12). Research in this area has focused on investigating the effects of ethanol on two large superfamilies of LGICs: 1) the Cys-loop superfamily of LGICs (13, 14), whose members include nicotinic acetylcholine, 5-hydroxytryptamine₃, γ-aminobutyric acid type A (GABA_A), γ-aminobutyric acid type C, and glycine receptors (GlyRs) (10, 11, 15–20) and 2) the glutamate superfamily, including N-methyl d-aspartate, α-amino-3-hydroxyisoxazolepropionic acid, and kainate receptors (21, 22). Recent studies have also begun investigating ethanol action in the ATP-gated P2X superfamily of LGICs (23–25).A series of studies that employed chimeric and mutagenic strategies combined with sulfhydryl-specific labeling identified key regions within Cys-loop receptors that appear to be initial targets for ethanol action that also can determine the sensitivity of the receptors to ethanol (7–12, 18, 19, 26–30). This work provides several lines of evidence that position 267 and possibly other sites in the transmembrane (TM) domain of GlyRs and homologous sites in GABA_ARs are targets for ethanol action and that mutations at these sites can influence ethanol sensitivity (8, 9, 26, 31).Growing evidence from GlyRs indicates that ethanol also acts on the extracellular domain. The initial findings came from studies demonstrating that α1GlyRs are more sensitive to ethanol than are α2GlyRs despite the high (∼78%) sequence homology between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (32). Further work found that an alanine to serine exchange at position 52 (A52S) in Loop 2 can eliminate the difference in ethanol sensitivity between α1GlyRs and α2GlyRs (18, 20, 33). These studies also demonstrated that mutations at position 52 in α1GlyRS and the homologous position 59 in α2GlyRs controlled the sensitivity of these receptors to a novel mechanistic ethanol antagonist (20). Collectively, these studies suggest that there are multiple sites of ethanol action in α1GlyRs, with one site located in the TM domain (e.g. position 267) and another in the extracellular domain (e.g. position 52).Subsequent studies revealed that the polarity of the residue at position 52 plays a key role in determining the sensitivity of GlyRs to ethanol (20). The findings with polarity in the extracellular domain contrast with the findings at position 267 in the TM domain, where molecular volume, but not polarity, significantly affected ethanol sensitivity (9). Taken together, these findings indicate that the physical-chemical parameters of residues at positions in the extracellular and TM domains that modulate ethanol effects and/or initiate ethanol action in GlyRs are not uniform. Thus, knowledge regarding the physical-chemical properties that control agonist and ethanol sensitivity is key for understanding the relationship between the structure and the actions of ethanol in LGICs (19, 31, 34–40).GlyRs and GABA_ARs, which differ significantly in their sensitivities to ethanol, offer a potential method for identifying the structures that control ethanol sensitivity. For example, α1GlyRs do not reliably respond to ethanol concentrations less than 10 mm (32, 33, 41). Similarly, γ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α1β2γ2), the most predominantly expressed GABA_ARs in the central nervous system, are insensitive to ethanol concentrations less than 50 mm (42, 43). In contrast, δ subunit-containing GABA_ARs (e.g. α4β3δ) have been shown to be sensitive to ethanol concentrations as low as 1–3 mm (44–51). Sequence alignment of α1GlyR, γGABA_AR, and δGABA_AR revealed differences between the Loop 2 regions of these receptor subunits. Since prior studies found that mutations of Loop 2 residues can affect ethanol sensitivity (19, 20, 39), the non-conserved residues in Loop 2 of GlyR and GABA_AR subunits could provide the physical-chemical and structural bases underlying the differences in ethanol sensitivity between these receptors.The present study tested the hypothesis that the structure of Loop 2 can markedly affect the ethanol sensitivity of GlyRs and GABA_ARs. To accomplish this, we performed multiple mutations that replaced the Loop 2 region of the α1 subunit in α1GlyRs and the Loop 2 region of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with corresponding non-conserved residues from the δ subunit of GABA_AR and tested the sensitivity of these receptors to ethanol. As predicted, replacing Loop 2 of WT α1GlyRs with the homologous residues from the δGABA_AR subunit (δL2), but not the γGABA_AR subunit (γL2), markedly increased the sensitivity of the receptor to ethanol. Similarly, replacing the non-conserved residues of the γ subunit of α1β2γ2 GABA_ARs with δL2 also markedly increased ethanol sensitivity of GABA_ARs. These findings support the hypothesis and suggest that Loop 2 may play a role in controlling ethanol sensitivity across the Cys-loop superfamily of receptors. The findings also provide the basis for suggesting structure-function relationships in a new molecular model of the GlyR based on the bacterial Gloeobacter violaceus pentameric LGIC homologue (GLIC).     

Dbf4-Cdc7 Phosphorylation of Mcm2 Is Required for Cell Growth

The Dbf4-Cdc7 kinase (DDK) is required for the activation of the origins of replication, and DDK phosphorylates Mcm2 in vitro. We find that budding yeast Cdc7 alone exists in solution as a weakly active multimer. Dbf4 forms a likely heterodimer with Cdc7, and this species phosphorylates Mcm2 with substantially higher specific activity. Dbf4 alone binds tightly to Mcm2, whereas Cdc7 alone binds weakly to Mcm2, suggesting that Dbf4 recruits Cdc7 to phosphorylate Mcm2. DDK phosphorylates two serine residues of Mcm2 near the N terminus of the protein, Ser-164 and Ser-170. Expression of mcm2-S170A is lethal to yeast cells that lack endogenous MCM2 (mcm2Δ); however, this lethality is rescued in cells harboring the DDK bypass mutant mcm5-bob1. We conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is required for cell growth.The Cdc7 protein kinase is required throughout the yeast S phase to activate origins (1, 2). The S phase cyclin-dependent kinase also activates yeast origins of replication (3–5). It has been proposed that Dbf4 activates Cdc7 kinase in S phase, and that Dbf4 interaction with Cdc7 is essential for Cdc7 kinase activity (6). However, it is not known how Dbf4-Cdc7 (DDK)² acts during S phase to trigger the initiation of DNA replication. DDK has homologs in other eukaryotic species, and the role of Cdc7 in activation of replication origins during S phase may be conserved (7–10).The Mcm2-7 complex functions with Cdc45 and GINS to unwind DNA at a replication fork (11–15). A mutation of MCM5 (mcm5-bob1) bypasses the cellular requirements for DBF4 and CDC7 (16), suggesting a critical physiologic interaction between Dbf4-Cdc7 and Mcm proteins. DDK phosphorylates Mcm2 in vitro with proteins purified from budding yeast (17, 18) or human cells (19). Furthermore, there are mutants of MCM2 that show synthetic lethality with DBF4 mutants (6, 17), suggesting a biologically relevant interaction between DBF4 and MCM2. Nevertheless, the physiologic role of DDK phosphorylation of Mcm2 is a matter of dispute. In human cells, replacement of MCM2 DDK-phosphoacceptor residues with alanines inhibits DNA replication, suggesting that Dbf4-Cdc7 phosphorylation of Mcm2 in humans is important for DNA replication (20). In contrast, mutation of putative DDK phosphorylation sites at the N terminus of Schizosaccharomyces pombe Mcm2 results in viable cells, suggesting that phosphorylation of S. pombe Mcm2 by DDK is not critical for cell growth (10).In budding yeast, Cdc7 is present at high levels in G₁ and S phase, whereas Dbf4 levels peak in S phase (18, 21, 22). Furthermore, budding yeast DDK binds to chromatin during S phase (6), and it has been shown that Dbf4 is required for Cdc7 binding to chromatin in budding yeast (23, 24), fission yeast (25), and Xenopus (9). Human and fission yeast Cdc7 are inert on their own (7, 8), but Dbf4-Cdc7 is active in phosphorylating Mcm proteins in budding yeast (6, 26), fission yeast (7), and human (8, 10). Based on these data, it has been proposed that Dbf4 activates Cdc7 kinase in S phase and that Dbf4 interaction with Cdc7 is essential for Cdc7 kinase activity (6, 9, 18, 21–24). However, a mechanistic analysis of how Dbf4 activates Cdc7 has not yet been accomplished. For example, the multimeric state of the active Dbf4-Cdc7 complex is currently disputed. A heterodimer of fission yeast Cdc7 (Hsk1) in complex with fission yeast Dbf4 (Dfp1) can phosphorylate Mcm2 (7). However, in budding yeast, oligomers of Cdc7 exist in the cell (27), and Dbf4-Cdc7 exists as oligomers of 180 and 300 kDa (27).DDK phosphorylates the N termini of human Mcm2 (19, 20, 28), human Mcm4 (10), budding yeast Mcm4 (26), and fission yeast Mcm6 (10). Although the sequences of the Mcm N termini are poorly conserved, the DDK sites identified in each study have neighboring acidic residues. The residues of budding yeast Mcm2 that are phosphorylated by DDK have not yet been identified.In this study, we find that budding yeast Cdc7 is weakly active as a multimer in phosphorylating Mcm2. However, a low molecular weight form of Dbf4-Cdc7, likely a heterodimer, has a higher specific activity for phosphorylation of Mcm2. Dbf4 or DDK, but not Cdc7, binds tightly to Mcm2, suggesting that Dbf4 recruits Cdc7 to Mcm2. DDK phosphorylates two serine residues of Mcm2, Ser-164 and Ser-170, in an acidic region of the protein. Mutation of Ser-170 is lethal to yeast cells, but this phenotype is rescued by the DDK bypass mutant mcm5-bob1. We conclude that DDK phosphorylation of Ser-170 of Mcm2 is required for budding yeast growth.     

Context-dependent Bcl-2/Bak Interactions Regulate Lymphoid Cell Apoptosis

The release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which leads to activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, is regulated by interactions of Bax and Bak with antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members. The factors that regulate these interactions are, at the present time, incompletely understood. Recent studies showing preferences in binding between synthetic Bcl-2 homology domain 3 and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members in vitro have suggested that the antiapoptotic proteins Mcl-1 and Bcl-x_L, but not Bcl-2, restrain proapoptotic Bak from inducing mitochondrial membrane permeabilization and apoptosis. Here we show that Bak protein has a much higher affinity than the 26-amino acid Bak Bcl-2 homology domain 3 for Bcl-2, that some naturally occurring Bcl-2 allelic variants have an affinity for full-length Bak that is only 3-fold lower than that of Mcl-1, and that endogenous levels of these Bcl-2 variants (which are as much as 40-fold more abundant than Mcl-1) restrain part of the Bak in intact lymphoid cells. In addition, we demonstrate that Bcl-2 variants can, depending on their affinity for Bak, substitute for Mcl-1 in protecting cells. Thus, the ability of Bcl-2 to protect cells from activated Bak depends on two important contextual variables, the identity of the Bcl-2 present and the amount expressed.The release of cytochrome c from mitochondria, which leads to activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway, is regulated by Bcl-2 family members (1–5). This group of proteins consists of three subgroups: Bax and Bak, which oligomerize upon death stimulation to form a putative pore in the outer mitochondrial membrane, thereby allowing efflux of cytochrome c and other mitochondrial intermembrane space components; Bcl-2, Bcl-x_L, Mcl-1, and other antiapoptotic homologs, which antagonize the effects of Bax and Bak; and BH3-only proteins² such as Bim, Bid, and Puma, which are proapoptotic Bcl-2 family members that share only limited homology with the other two groups in a single 15-amino acid domain (the BH3 domain, see Ref. 6). Although it is clear that BH3-only proteins serve as molecular sensors of various stresses and, when activated, trigger apoptosis (3, 6–11), the mechanism by which they do so remains incompletely understood. One current model suggests that BH3-only proteins trigger apoptosis solely by binding and neutralizing antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members, thereby causing them to release the activated Bax and Bak that are bound (reviewed in Refs. 9 and 10; see also Refs. 12 and 13), whereas another current model suggests that certain BH3-only proteins also directly bind to and activate Bax (reviewed in Ref. 3; see also Refs. 14–17). Whichever model turns out to be correct, both models agree that certain antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members can inhibit apoptosis, at least in part, by binding and neutralizing activated Bax and Bak before they permeabilize the outer mitochondrial membrane (13, 18, 19).Much of the information about the interactions between pro- and antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members has been derived from the study of synthetic peptides corresponding to BH3 domains. In particular, these synthetic peptides have been utilized as surrogates for the full-length proapoptotic proteins during structure determinations (20–22) as well as in functional studies exploring the effect of purified BH3 domains on isolated mitochondria (14, 23) and on Bax-mediated permeabilization of lipid vesicles (15).Recent studies using these same peptides have suggested that interactions of the BH3 domains of Bax, Bak, and the BH3-only proteins with the “BH3 receptors” of the antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family members are not all equivalent. Surface plasmon resonance, a technique that is widely used to examine the interactions of biomolecules under cell-free conditions (24–26), has demonstrated that synthetic BH3 peptides of some BH3-only family members show striking preferences, with the Bad BH3 peptide binding to Bcl-2 and Bcl-x_L but not Mcl-1, and the Noxa BH3 peptide binding to Mcl-1 but not Bcl-2 or Bcl-x_L (27). Likewise, the Bak BH3 peptide exhibits selectivity, with high affinity for Bcl-x_L and Mcl-1 but not Bcl-2 (12). The latter results have led to a model in which Bcl-x_L and Mcl-1 restrain Bak and inhibit Bak-dependent apoptosis, whereas Bcl-2 does not (10).Because the Bak protein contains multiple recognizable domains in addition to its BH3 motif (28, 29), we compared the binding of Bak BH3 peptide and Bak protein to Bcl-2. Surface plasmon resonance demonstrated that Bcl-2 binds Bak protein with much higher affinity than the Bak 26-mer BH3 peptide. Further experiments demonstrated that the K_D for Bak differs among naturally occurring Bcl-2 sequence variants but is only 3-fold higher than that of Mcl-1 in some cases. In light of previous reports that Bcl-2 overexpression contributes to neoplastic transformation (30–33) and drug resistance (34–36) in lymphoid cells, we also examined Bcl-2 expression and Bak binding in a panel of neoplastic lymphoid cell lines. Results of these experiments demonstrated that Bcl-2 expression varies among different lymphoid cell lines but is up to 40-fold more abundant than Mcl-1. In lymphoid cell lines with abundant Bcl-2, Bak is detected in Bcl-2 as well as Mcl-1 immunoprecipitates; and Bak-dependent apoptosis induced by Mcl-1 down-regulation can be prevented by Bcl-2 overexpression. Collectively, these observations shed new light on the role of Bcl-2 in binding and neutralizing Bak.     

A New in Vivo Cross-linking Mass Spectrometry Platform to Define Protein–Protein Interactions in Living Cells

Protein–protein interactions (PPIs) are fundamental to the structure and function of protein complexes. Resolving the physical contacts between proteins as they occur in cells is critical to uncovering the molecular details underlying various cellular activities. To advance the study of PPIs in living cells, we have developed a new in vivo cross-linking mass spectrometry platform that couples a novel membrane-permeable, enrichable, and MS-cleavable cross-linker with multistage tandem mass spectrometry. This strategy permits the effective capture, enrichment, and identification of in vivo cross-linked products from mammalian cells and thus enables the determination of protein interaction interfaces. The utility of the developed method has been demonstrated by profiling PPIs in mammalian cells at the proteome scale and the targeted protein complex level. Our work represents a general approach for studying in vivo PPIs and provides a solid foundation for future studies toward the complete mapping of PPI networks in living systems.Protein–protein interactions (PPIs)¹ play a key role in defining protein functions in biological systems. Aberrant PPIs can have drastic effects on biochemical activities essential to cell homeostasis, growth, and proliferation, and thereby lead to various human diseases (1). Consequently, PPI interfaces have been recognized as a new paradigm for drug development. Therefore, mapping PPIs and their interaction interfaces in living cells is critical not only for a comprehensive understanding of protein function and regulation, but also for describing the molecular mechanisms underlying human pathologies and identifying potential targets for better therapeutics.Several strategies exist for identifying and mapping PPIs, including yeast two-hybrid, protein microarray, and affinity purification mass spectrometry (AP-MS) (2–5). Thanks to new developments in sample preparation strategies, mass spectrometry technologies, and bioinformatics tools, AP-MS has become a powerful and preferred method for studying PPIs at the systems level (6–9). Unlike other approaches, AP-MS experiments allow the capture of protein interactions directly from their natural cellular environment, thus better retaining native protein structures and biologically relevant interactions. In addition, a broader scope of PPI networks can be obtained with greater sensitivity, accuracy, versatility, and speed. Despite the success of this very promising technique, AP-MS experiments can lead to the loss of weak/transient interactions and/or the reorganization of protein interactions during biochemical manipulation under native purification conditions. To circumvent these problems, in vivo chemical cross-linking has been successfully employed to stabilize protein interactions in native cells or tissues prior to cell lysis (10–16). The resulting covalent bonds formed between interacting partners allow affinity purification under stringent and fully denaturing conditions, consequently reducing nonspecific background while preserving stable and weak/transient interactions (12–16). Subsequent mass spectrometric analysis can reveal not only the identities of interacting proteins, but also cross-linked amino acid residues. The latter provides direct molecular evidence describing the physical contacts between and within proteins (17). This information can be used for computational modeling to establish structural topologies of proteins and protein complexes (17–22), as well as for generating experimentally derived protein interaction network topology maps (23, 24). Thus, cross-linking mass spectrometry (XL-MS) strategies represent a powerful and emergent technology that possesses unparalleled capabilities for studying PPIs.Despite their great potential, current XL-MS studies that have aimed to identify cross-linked peptides have been mostly limited to in vitro cross-linking experiments, with few successfully identifying protein interaction interfaces in living cells (24, 25). This is largely because XL-MS studies remain challenging due to the inherent difficulty in the effective MS detection and accurate identification of cross-linked peptides, as well as in unambiguous assignment of cross-linked residues. In general, cross-linked products are heterogeneous and low in abundance relative to non-cross-linked products. In addition, their MS fragmentation is too complex to be interpreted using conventional database searching tools (17, 26). It is noted that almost all of the current in vivo PPI studies utilize formaldehyde cross-linking because of its membrane permeability and fast kinetics (10–16). However, in comparison to the most commonly used amine reactive NHS ester cross-linkers, identification of formaldehyde cross-linked peptides is even more challenging because of its promiscuous nonspecific reactivity and extremely short spacer length (27). Therefore, further developments in reagents and methods are urgently needed to enable simple MS detection and effective identification of in vivo cross-linked products, and thus allow the mapping of authentic protein contact sites as established in cells, especially for protein complexes.Various efforts have been made to address the limitations of XL-MS studies, resulting in new developments in bioinformatics tools for improved data interpretation (28–32) and new designs of cross-linking reagents for enhanced MS analysis of cross-linked peptides (24, 33–39). Among these approaches, the development of new cross-linking reagents holds great promise for mapping PPIs on the systems level. One class of cross-linking reagents containing an enrichment handle have been shown to allow selective isolation of cross-linked products from complex mixtures, boosting their detectability by MS (33–35, 40–42). A second class of cross-linkers containing MS-cleavable bonds have proven to be effective in facilitating the unambiguous identification of cross-linked peptides (36–39, 43, 44), as the resulting cross-linked products can be identified based on their characteristic and simplified fragmentation behavior during MS analysis. Therefore, an ideal cross-linking reagent would possess the combined features of both classes of cross-linkers. To advance the study of in vivo PPIs, we have developed a new XL-MS platform based on a novel membrane-permeable, enrichable, and MS-cleavable cross-linker, Azide-A-DSBSO (azide-tagged, acid-cleavable disuccinimidyl bis-sulfoxide), and multistage tandem mass spectrometry (MSⁿ). This new XL-MS strategy has been successfully employed to map in vivo PPIs from mammalian cells at both the proteome scale and the targeted protein complex level.     

Aberrant Splice Variants of HAS1 (Hyaluronan Synthase 1) Multimerize with and Modulate Normally Spliced HAS1 Protein: A POTENTIAL MECHANISM PROMOTING HUMAN CANCER*

Most human genes undergo alternative splicing, but aberrant splice forms are hallmarks of many cancers, usually resulting from mutations initiating abnormal exon skipping, intron retention, or the introduction of a new splice sites. We have identified a family of aberrant splice variants of HAS1 (the hyaluronan synthase 1 gene) in some B lineage cancers, characterized by exon skipping and/or partial intron retention events that occur either together or independently in different variants, apparently due to accumulation of inherited and acquired mutations. Cellular, biochemical, and oncogenic properties of full-length HAS1 (HAS1-FL) and HAS1 splice variants Va, Vb, and Vc (HAS1-Vs) are compared and characterized. When co-expressed, the properties of HAS1-Vs are dominant over those of HAS1-FL. HAS1-FL appears to be diffusely expressed in the cell, but HAS1-Vs are concentrated in the cytoplasm and/or Golgi apparatus. HAS1-Vs synthesize detectable de novo HA intracellularly. Each of the HAS1-Vs is able to relocalize HAS1-FL protein from diffuse cytoskeleton-anchored locations to deeper cytoplasmic spaces. This HAS1-Vs-mediated relocalization occurs through strong molecular interactions, which also serve to protect HAS1-FL from its otherwise high turnover kinetics. In co-transfected cells, HAS1-FL and HAS1-Vs interact with themselves and with each other to form heteromeric multiprotein assemblies. HAS1-Vc was found to be transforming in vitro and tumorigenic in vivo when introduced as a single oncogene to untransformed cells. The altered distribution and half-life of HAS1-FL, coupled with the characteristics of the HAS1-Vs suggest possible mechanisms whereby the aberrant splicing observed in human cancer may contribute to oncogenesis and disease progression.About 70–80% of human genes undergo alternative splicing, contributing to proteomic diversity and regulatory complexities in normal development (1). About 10% of mutations listed so far in the Human Gene Mutation Database (HGMD) of “gene lesions responsible for human inherited disease” were found to be located within splice sites. Furthermore, it is becoming increasingly apparent that aberrant splice variants, generated mostly due to splicing defects, play a key role in cancer. Germ line or acquired genomic changes (mutations) in/around splicing elements (2–4) promote aberrant splicing and aberrant protein isoforms.Hyaluronan (HA)³ is synthesized by three different plasma membrane-bound hyaluronan synthases (1, 2, and 3). HAS1 undergoes alternative and aberrant intronic splicing in multiple myeloma, producing truncated variants termed Va, Vb, and Vc (5, 6), which predicted for poor survival in a cohort of multiple myeloma patients (5). Our work suggests that this aberrant splicing arises due to inherited predispositions and acquired mutations in the HAS1 gene (7). Cancer-related, defective mRNA splicing caused by polymorphisms and/or mutations in splicing elements often results in inactivation of tumor suppressor activity (e.g. HRPT2 (8, 9), PTEN (10), MLHI (11–14), and ATR (15)) or generation of dominant negative inhibitors (e.g. CHEK2 (16) and VWOX (17)). In breast cancer, aberrantly spliced forms of progesterone and estrogen receptors are found (reviewed in Ref. 3). Intronic mutations inactivate p53 through aberrant splicing and intron retention (18). Somatic mutations with the potential to alter splicing are frequent in some cancers (19–25). Single nucleotide polymorphisms in the cyclin D1 proto-oncogene predispose to aberrant splicing and the cyclin D1b intronic splice variant (26–29). Cyclin D1b confers anchorage independence, is tumorogenic in vivo, and is detectable in human tumors (30), but as yet no clinical studies have confirmed an impact on outcome. On the other hand, aberrant splicing of HAS1 shows an association between aberrant splice variants and malignancy, suggesting that such variants may be potential therapeutic targets and diagnostic indicators (19, 31–33). Increased HA expression has been associated with malignant progression of multiple tumor types, including breast, prostate, colon, glioma, mesothelioma, and multiple myeloma (34). The three mammalian HA synthase (HAS) isoenzymes synthesize HA and are integral transmembrane proteins with a probable porelike structural assembly (35–39). Although in humans, the three HAS genes are located on different chromosomes (hCh19, hCh8, and hCh16, respectively) (40), they share a high degree of sequence homology (41, 42). HAS isoenzymes synthesize a different size range of HA molecules, which exhibit different functions (43, 44). HASs contribute to a variety of cancers (45–55). Overexpression of HASs promotes growth and/or metastatic development in fibrosarcoma, prostate, and mammary carcinoma, and the removal of the HA matrix from a migratory cell membrane inhibits cell movement (45, 53). HAS2 confers anchorage independence (56). Our work has shown aberrant HAS1 splicing in multiple myeloma (5) and Waldenstrom''s macroglobulinemia (6). HAS1 is overexpressed in colon (57), ovarian (58), endometrial (59), mesothelioma (60), and bladder cancers (61). A HAS1 splice variant is detected in bladder cancer (61).Here, we characterize molecular and biochemical characteristics of HAS1 variants (HAS1-Vs) (5), generated by aberrant splicing. Using transient transfectants and tagged HAS1 family constructs, we show that HAS1-Vs differ in cellular localization, de novo HA localization, and turnover kinetics, as compared with HAS1-FL, and dominantly influence HAS1-FL when co-expressed. HAS1-Vs proteins form intra- and intermolecular associations among themselves and with HAS1-FL, including covalent interactions and multimer formation. HAS1-Vc supports vigorous cellular transformation of NIH3T3 cells in vitro, and HAS1-Vc-transformed NIH3T3 cells are tumorogenic in vivo.     

Human OS-9, a Lectin Required for Glycoprotein Endoplasmic Reticulum-associated Degradation, Recognizes Mannose-trimmed N-Glycans

In the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), lectins and processing enzymes are involved in quality control of newly synthesized proteins for productive folding as well as in the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) of misfolded proteins. ER quality control requires the recognition and modification of the N-linked oligosaccharides attached to glycoproteins. Mannose trimming from the N-glycans plays an important role in targeting of misfolded glycoproteins for ERAD. Recently, two mammalian lectins, OS-9 and XTP3-B, which contain mannose 6-phosphate receptor homology domains, were reported to be involved in ER quality control. Here, we examined the requirement for human OS-9 (hOS-9) lectin activity in degradation of the glycosylated ERAD substrate NHK, a genetic variant of α1-antitrypsin. Using frontal affinity chromatography, we demonstrated that the recombinant hOS-9 mannose 6-phosphate receptor homology domain specifically binds N-glycans lacking the terminal mannose from the C branch in vitro. To examine the specificity of OS-9 recognition of N-glycans in vivo, we modified the oligosaccharide structures on NHK by overexpressing ER α1,2-mannosidase I or EDEM3 and examined the effect of these modifications on NHK degradation in combination with small interfering RNA-mediated knockdown of hOS-9. The ability of hOS-9 to enhance glycoprotein ERAD depended on the N-glycan structures on NHK, consistent with the frontal affinity chromatography results. Thus, we propose a model for mannose trimming and the requirement for hOS-9 lectin activity in glycoprotein ERAD in which N-glycans lacking the terminal mannose from the C branch are recognized by hOS-9 and targeted for degradation.Recognition and sorting of improperly folded proteins is essential to cell survival, and hence, an elaborate quality control system is found in cells. ER⁴ quality control is well characterized with respect to the N-linked oligosaccharides regulating the folding and degradation of newly synthesized proteins in the ER (1). Immediately after polypeptides enter the ER, Glc₃Man₉GlcNAc₂ (G3M9) precursor oligosaccharides are covalently attached and subsequently processed. Terminally misfolded proteins are removed from the ER by the ERAD machinery (1–4). Aberrant conformers are recognized, retrotranslocated to the cytosol, and degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome system (5, 6). Processing of mannose residues from the N-linked oligosaccharides acts as a timer for the recognition of misfolded glycoproteins in the ER lumen (1, 7). ER α1,2-mannosidase I (ER ManI) in mammals and ER α-mannosidase in yeast preferentially trim mannose residues from the middle branch of N-glycans, generating the Man₈GlcNAc₂ (M8) isomer B (M8B) (8). In mammals, further mannose processing is required as a signal for degradation (1, 9, 10), whereas the presence of M8B is sufficient to signal degradation in yeast (11). The postulated lectin EDEMs in mammals, their yeast homolog Htm1p/Mnl1p, and the yeast MRH domain-containing lectin Yos9p have all been proposed to recognize glycoproteins targeted for degradation (12).The role of Yos9p in glycoprotein ERAD was identified using a genetic screen in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (13). Yos9p, a homolog of hOS-9, contains an MRH domain (14) and functions as a lectin. Yos9p recognizes substrates of the ERAD-lumenal pathway (15–17), generating a large ER membrane complex containing the Hrd1p-Hrd3p ubiquitin ligase core complex (18–20). The M8B and Man₅GlcNAc₂ (M5) N-glycans are predicted to function as ligands for Yos9p (17). Bipartite recognition of both glycan and polypeptide by Yos9p has also been reported (15).Recent studies revealed that two mammalian MRH domain-containing lectins, OS-9 and XTP3-B, are ER luminal proteins involved in ER quality control and form a large complex containing the HRD1-SEL1L ubiquitin-ligase in the ER membrane (21–24). The components of the complex are similar to yeast, suggesting evolutionary conservation, although the molecular mechanisms underlying the role of OS-9 and XTP3-B remain elusive. Studies using lectin mutants have suggested that the MRH domains are required not for binding to ERAD substrates but for interactions with SEL1L (21), which has multiple N-glycans (25, 26). Additionally, lectin activity appears to be dispensable for hOS-9 binding to misfolded glycoproteins (21, 24). Thus, to understand the role of hOS-9 in the ER quality control pathway, the specific carbohydrate structures recognized by the hOS-9 MRH domain need to be identified, and the requirement of the lectin domain in substrate recognition needs to be determined.In the present study we demonstrate that the lectin activity of hOS-9 is required for enhancement of glycoprotein ERAD. We identified the N-glycan structures recognized by the recombinant hOS-9 MRH domain in vitro by frontal affinity chromatography (FAC). Using a model ERAD substrate, NHK (27), we show that the ability of hOS-9 to enhance ERAD in vivo depends on the oligosaccharides present on NHK, consistent with the FAC results.     

Differential Regulation of Elastic Fiber Formation by Fibulin-4 and -5

Fibulin-4 and -5 are extracellular glycoproteins with essential non-compensatory roles in elastic fiber assembly. We have determined how they interact with tropoelastin, lysyl oxidase, and fibrillin-1, thereby revealing how they differentially regulate assembly. Strong binding between fibulin-4 and lysyl oxidase enhanced the interaction of fibulin-4 with tropoelastin, forming ternary complexes that may direct elastin cross-linking. In contrast, fibulin-5 did not bind lysyl oxidase strongly but bound tropoelastin in terminal and central regions and could concurrently bind fibulin-4. Both fibulins differentially bound N-terminal fibrillin-1, which strongly inhibited their binding to lysyl oxidase and tropoelastin. Knockdown experiments revealed that fibulin-5 controlled elastin deposition on microfibrils, although fibulin-4 can also bind fibrillin-1. These experiments provide a molecular account of the distinct roles of fibulin-4 and -5 in elastic fiber assembly and how they act in concert to chaperone cross-linked elastin onto microfibrils.Fibulins are a family of extracellular glycoproteins containing contiguous calcium-binding epidermal growth factor-like domains (cbEGFs)³ and a characteristic C-terminal fibulin (FC) domain (1–3). Recent studies have revealed that fibulin-4 and -5 are both essential for elastic fiber formation (4–7). Fibulin-4 is widely expressed from early embryogenesis and is necessary for normal vascular, lung, and skin development, since mice that lack fibulin-4 do not form elastic fibers and die perinatally (5). Furthermore, mice with reduced fibulin-4 expression develop aneurysms (8). Fibulin-5 is abundant in the aorta and large arteries during embryogenesis and following vascular injury (9, 10). Lack of fibulin-5 causes a less severe phenotype, with viable homozygous mice, but the elastic fibers in skin, lungs, and aorta are irregular and fragmented (6, 7), and there is altered vascular remodeling (11). These mice models also highlight that fibulin-4 and -5 have non-compensatory roles in elastic fiber formation. Mutations in both molecules can cause cutis laxa, a heritable disorder associated with elastic fiber degeneration leading to sagging skin, vascular tortuosity, and emphysematous lungs (12–15). A third isoform, fibulin-3, may play a minor role in elastic fiber formation, since its deficiency disrupts elastic fibers in Bruch''s membrane of the eye (16) and vaginal tissues (17).Elastic fiber formation is a complex multistep process (18–20). Initial pericellular microassembly of tropoelastin, which may involve the 67-kDa elastin-binding protein receptor, generates elastin globules that are stabilized by desmosine cross-links catalyzed mainly by lysyl oxidase (LOX) but also by LOXL1 (LOX-like 1). These globules are deposited on a fibrillin microfibril template, where they coalesce and undergo further cross-linking to form the elastin core of mature fibers. The ability of fibulin-4 and -5 to bind tropoelastin and fibrillin-1, the major structural component of microfibrils, supports a model in which these fibulins direct elastin deposition on microfibrils (4–7, 21–25). This model does not delineate the unique molecular contributions of fibulin-4 and -5 to elastic fiber formation, but some molecular differences have emerged. Tropoelastin was bound more strongly by fibulin-5 than by fibulin-4, whereas fibulin-5 was at the microfibril-elastin interface, but perichondrial fibulin-4 localized mainly to microfibrils (4).Fibulin-4 null mice offer tantalizing clues to how fibulin-4 contributes to elastic fiber formation (5). They had dramatically reduced (94%) desmosine cross-links despite no change in elastin or LOX expression levels, and electron-dense rodlike structures were prominent within elastin aggregates. Morphologically similar structures seen after chemically inhibiting LOX were previously identified as glycosaminoglycans, which can bind charged free ϵ-amino groups on lysines in tropoelastin (26). However, fibulin-4^+/− mice showed ∼20% increase in desmosine (5). LOX-null mice have phenotypic features similar to those of fibulin-4 null mice, dying perinatally with 60% reduced desmosine cross-links and major abnormalities in vascular and other elastic tissues (27, 28). In contrast, LOXL1-null mice are viable but have reduced desmosine (29), whereas fibulin-5 null mice have a 16% reduction in desmosine cross-links and survive well into adulthood (7). Detection of the LOXL1 pro-domain in fibulin-5 null mice skin but not wild-type skin implicates fibulin-5 in activation of LOXL1 (30).We and others have shown that fibrillin-1 and the microfibrillar protein MAGP-1 can both directly bind tropoelastin (31–34). However, the fibulin-null mice show that the fibrillin-1 interaction with tropoelastin is insufficient to support elastic fiber formation in vivo. Fibulin-5 has been reported to facilitate tropoelastin binding to the N-terminal half of fibrillin-1 (21). A study of elastin polypeptide self-assembly through coacervation and maturation phases showed that, although the N-terminal half of fibrillin-1 increased maturation velocity and droplet clustering, fibulin-4 and -5 both slowed maturation and limited globule growth (35). These studies imply that fibulins and fibrillin-1 act together to regulate elastin accretion on microfibrils.To gain further insights into the contributions of fibulin-4 and -5 to elastic fiber formation, we have delineated how they interact with tropoelastin, LOX, and fibrillin-1. Novel findings are that fibulin-4 directly binds LOX, and this interaction enhances fibulin-4 binding to tropoelastin, thus forming a ternary complex that may be critical for elastin cross-linking. Fibulin-5 can concurrently bind fibulin-4 and tropoelastin, but the interaction of both fibulins with fibrillin-1 strongly inhibits their binding to tropoelastin. These interactions indicate the molecular basis of how fibulins act as chaperones for deposition of elastin onto microfibrils. Our study thus provides a molecular account of the differential roles of fibulins-4 and -5 in elastic fiber formation.