Growth analysis of wild-type and photomorphogenic-mutant tomato plants

A custom designed growth-measuring apparatus, controlled by a microcomputer has been used to study extension growth kinetics of wild-type and photomorphogenic-mutant tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) plants with and without end-of-day farred light (EODFR). The following photomorphogenic mutants were used. Far-red insensitive ( fri ^.1): deficient in phytochrome A (phyA); temporarily red light-insensitive ( tri ^.3): deficient in phytochrome Bl (phyB1), and their isogenic wild type (WT) cv. MoneyMaker. aurea (au) : deficient in phytochrome chromophore biosynthesis; high-pigment-1 ( hp-1 ): exhibiting exaggerated phytochrome responses, and their isogenic WT cv. Ailsa Craig. The stem elongation rate (SER) during a 24-h period of all the genotypes studied shows a similar pattern, having two dramatic transients, one shortly after the onset of the light period (a sharp decline in SER) and another shortly after the start of the dark period (a sharp increase in SER). These transients are probably associated with water relations as a consequence of opening and closure of the stomata. The fastest SER occurs during the dramatic oscillations early in the dark period. Between the genotypes there are large quantitative differences in SER. All the genotypes tested exhibited a strong EODFR response, resulting in a relative promotion of SER during the first period after the start of EODFR and in the subsequent light and dark periods. These results indicate that phyA, absent in the fri ^.1 mutant, does not play a major role in SER of light-grown tomato plants, whereas phyB 1, absent in the tri ^.3 mutant, is partly responsible for the compact stature of WT plants. An additional phytochrome other than phy A and phy B1 must therefore be capable of eliciting the EODFR response.     

Far-red light-insensitive, phytochrome A-deficient mutants of tomato

We have selected two recessive mutants of tomato with slightly longer hypocotyls than the wild type, one under low fluence rate (3 mol/m²/s) red light (R) and the other under low fluence rate blue light. These two mutants were shown to be allelic and further analysis revealed that hypocotyl growth was totally insensitive to far-red light (FR). We propose the gene symbol fri (far-red light insensitive) for this locus and have mapped it on chromosome 10. Immunochemically detectable phytochrome A polypeptide is essentially absent in the fri mutants as is the bulk spectrophotometrically detectable labile phytochrome pool in etiolated seedlings. A phytochrome B-like polypeptide is present in normal amounts and a small stable phytochrome pool can be readily detected by spectrophotometry in the fri mutants. Inhibition of hypocotyl growth by a R pulse given every 4 h is quantitatively similar in the fri mutants and wild type and the effect is to a large extent reversible if R pulses are followed immediately by a FR pulse. After 7 days in darkness, both fri mutants and the wild type become green on transfer to white light, but after 7 days in FR, the wild-type seedlings that have expanded their cotyledons lose their capacity to green in white light, while the fri mutants de-etiolate. Adult plants of the fri mutants show retarded growth and are prone to wilting, but exhibit a normal elongation response to FR given at the end of the daily photoperiod. The inhibition of seed germination by continuous FR exhibited by the wild type is normal in the fri mutants. It is proposed that these fri mutants are putative phytochrome A mutants which have normal pools of other phytochromes.     

Physiological interactions of phytochromes A, B1 and B2 in the control of development in tomato

The role of phytochrome B2 (phyB2) in the control of photomorphogenesis in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) has been investigated using recently isolated mutants carrying lesions in the PHYB2 gene. The physiological interactions of phytochrome A (phyA), phytochrome B1 (phyB1) and phyB2 have also been explored, using an isogenic series of all possible mutant combinations and several different phenotypic characteristics. The loss of phyB2 had a negligible effect on the development of white-light-grown wild-type or phyA-deficient plants, but substantially enhanced the elongated pale phenotype of the phyB1 mutant. This redundancy was also seen in the control of de-etiolation under continuous red light (R), where the loss of phyB2 had no detectable effect in the presence of phyB1. Under continuous R, phyA action was largely independent of phyB1 and phyB2 in terms of the control of hypocotyl elongation, but antagonized the effects of phyB1 in the control of anthocyanin synthesis, indicating that photoreceptors may interact differently to control different traits. Irradiance response curves for anthocyanin synthesis revealed that phyB1 and phyB2 together mediate all the detectable response to high-irradiance R, and, surprisingly, that the phyA-dependent low-irradiance component is also strongly reduced in the phyB1 phyB2 double mutant. This is not associated with a reduction in phyA protein content or responsiveness to continuous far-red light (FR), suggesting that phyB1 and phyB2 specifically influence phyA activity under low-irradiance R. Finally, the phyA phyB1 phyB2 triple mutant showed strong residual responsiveness to supplementary daytime FR, indicating that at least one of the two remaining phytochromes plays a significant role in tomato photomorphogenesis.     

Stem extension-growth responses to blue light require Pfr in tomato seedlings but are not reduced by the low phytochrome levels of the aurea mutant

The effects of blue light (B) on stem extension growth were investigated in wild-type (WT) and aurea (au ) mutant seedlings of tomato. The au mutant has reduced phytochrome levels. Etiolated seedlings were grown under background red light (R) or far-red light (FR) with or without B. Hypocotyl growth was inhibited by B added to R but not by B added to FR, both in WT and au seedlings. The levels of B and/or R reaching the stem of fully de-etiolated seedlings grown in a glasshouse were reduced by means of collars around it. Both in WT and au -mutant seedlings the responses to B were larger at high than at low R/FR quantum ratios. In etiolated and light-grown au seedlings, changing the levels of phytochrome-absorbable radiation did not cause the same effect as changing B levels, indicating the action of specific BL/UV-A photoreceptor(s) (BAP). The responses to B are reduced by the low calculated levels of Pfr established by light treatments but not by the low levels of phytochrome present in the au mutant. The au mutant appears to be deficient in a phytochrome pool that is not essential for the interdependent co-action observed between phytochrome and BAP in the control of stem extension growth in tomato.     

Analysis of phytochrome-deficient yellow-green-2 and aurea mutants of tomato

Two alleles of the yellow-green-2 ( yg-2) and eight different alleles of the aurea ( au ) locus of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) were compared. All are characterized by a paler green colour compared with wild-type (WT), an elongated hypocotyl in red light, and low or below detection limits of spectrophotometrically active phytochrome. Hypocotyl length was variable in white light, ranging from that of WT to more elongated. Immunochemical analysis revealed that etiolated seedlings of the yg-2 mutant have approximately 25% of the WT level of phytochrome A protein (PHYA), whereas that of phytochrome B protein (PHYB) is normal. In this it resembles the au mutant. The au,yg-2 double mutant has a more extreme chlorophyll deficiency than either parent. Since the yg-2 and au mutants have a less severe phenotype at the adult stage, that is, are leaky, the additive effect can be explained by assuming that the mutants control two steps in the chromophore biosynthesis pathway. Combination, by crossing, of the yg-2 and au mutants with a transgenic tomato line that overexpresses oat phytochrome A3 (PhyA-3) essentially failed to restore the WT phenotype under white fluorescent light conditions, although under greenhouse conditions some evidence for increased sensitivity to light was observed. Immunochemically, oat PHYA-3 protein is detectable in both the yg-2,PhyA-3 and au,PhyA-3 'double' mutants. Spectrophotometrical analysis, however, revealed that holophytochrome was undetectable in the yg-2,PhyA-3 and au,PhyA-3 'double' mutants. These results are compatible with both mutants being disturbed in phytochrome chromophore biosynthesis.     

Blue light and phytochrome-mediated stomatal opening in the npq1 and phot1 phot2 mutants of Arabidopsis

Recent studies have shown that blue light-specific stomatal opening is reversed by green light and that far-red light can be used to probe phytochrome-dependent stomatal movements. Here, blue-green reversibility and far-red light were used to probe the stomatal responses of the npq1 mutant and the phot1 phot2 double mutant of Arabidopsis. In plants grown at 50 micromol m-2 s-1, red light (photosynthetic)-mediated opening in isolated stomata from wild type (WT) and both mutants saturated at 100 micromol m-2 s-1. Higher fluence rates caused stomatal closing, most likely due to photo-inhibition. Blue light-specific opening, probed by adding blue light (10 micromol m-2 s-1) to a 100 micromol m-2 s-1 red background, was found in WT, but not in npq1 or phot1 phot2 double mutant stomata. Under 50 micromol m-2 s-1 red light, 10 micromol m-2 s-1 blue light opened stomata in both WT and npq1 mutant stomata but not in the phot1 phot2 double mutant. In npq1, blue light-stimulated opening was reversed by far-red but not green light, indicating that npq1 has a phytochrome-mediated response and lacks a blue light-specific response. Stomata of the phot1 phot2 double mutant opened in response to 20 to 50 micromol m-2 s-1 blue light. This opening was green light reversible and far-red light insensitive, indicating that stomata of the phot1 phot2 double mutant have a detectable blue light-specific response.     

Isolation and characterization of rice phytochrome A mutants

To elucidate phytochrome A (phyA) function in rice, we screened a large population of retrotransposon (Tos17) insertional mutants by polymerase chain reaction and isolated three independent phyA mutant lines. Sequencing of the Tos17 insertion sites confirmed that the Tos17s interrupted exons of PHYA genes in these mutant lines. Moreover, the phyA polypeptides were not immunochemically detectable in these phyA mutants. The seedlings of phyA mutants grown in continuous far-red light showed essentially the same phenotype as dark-grown seedlings, indicating the insensitivity of phyA mutants to far-red light. The etiolated seedlings of phyA mutants also were insensitive to a pulse of far-red light or very low fluence red light. In contrast, phyA mutants were morphologically indistinguishable from wild type under continuous red light. Therefore, rice phyA controls photomorphogenesis in two distinct modes of photoperception--far-red light-dependent high irradiance response and very low fluence response--and such function seems to be unique and restricted to the deetiolation process. Interestingly, continuous far-red light induced the expression of CAB and RBCS genes in rice phyA seedlings, suggesting the existence of a photoreceptor(s) other than phyA that can perceive continuous far-red light in the etiolated seedlings.     

Genetic analysis of the roles of phytochromes A and B1 in the reversed gravitropic response of the lz-2 tomato mutant

The lz-2 mutation in tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum ) causes conditional reversal of shoot gravitropism by light. This response is mediated by phytochrome. To further elicit the mechanism by which phytochrome regulates the lz-2 phenotype, phytochrome-deficient lz-2 plants were generated. Introduction of au alleles, which severely block chromophore biosynthesis, eliminated the reversal of hypocotyl gravitropism in continuous red and far-red light. The fri ¹ and tri ¹ alleles were introduced to specifically deplete phytochromes A and B1, respectively. In dark-grown seedlings, phytochrome A was necessary for response to high-irradiance far-red light, a complete response to low fluence red light, and also mediated the effects of blue light in a far-red reversible manner. Loss of phytochrome B1 alone did not significantly affect the behaviour of lz-2 plants under any light treatment tested. However, dark-grown lz-2 plants lacking both phytochrome A and B1 exhibited reduced responses to continuous red and were less responsive to low fluence red light and high fluence blue light than plants that were deficient for phytochrome A alone. In high light, full spectrum greenhouse conditions, lz-2 plants grew downward regardless of the phytochrome deficiency. These results indicate that phytochromes A and B1 play significant roles in mediating the lz-2 phenotype and that at least one additional phytochrome is involved in reversing shoot gravitropism in this mutant.     

Phytochrome A Mediates the Promotion of Seed Germination by Very Low Fluences of Light and Canopy Shade Light in Arabidopsis

Seeds of the wild type (WT) and of the phyA and phyB mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana were exposed to single red light (R)/far-red light (FR) pulses predicted to establish a series of calculated phytochrome photoequilibria (Pfr/P). WT and phyB seeds showed biphasic responses to Pfr/P. The first phase, i.e. the very-low-fluence response (VLFR), occurred below Pfr/P = 10-1%. The second phase, i.e. the low-fluence response, occurred above Pfr/P = 3%. The VLFR was similarly induced by either a FR pulse saturating photoconversion or a subsaturating R pulse predicted to establish the same Pfr/P. The VLFR was absent in phyA seeds, which showed a strong low-fluence response. In the field, even brief exposures to the very low fluences of canopy shade light (R/FR ratio < 0.05) promoted germination above dark controls in WT and phyB seeds but not in the phyA mutant. Seeds of the phyA mutant germinated normally under canopies providing higher R/FR ratios or under deep canopy shade light supplemented with R from light-emitting diodes. We propose that phytochrome A mediates VLFR of A. thaliana seeds.     

Coupling of phytochrome B to the control of hypocotyl growth in Arabidopsis

Etiolated seedlings of the wild-type (WT) and of the phyB-1 mutant of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh. were exposed to red-light (R) and far-red light (FR) treatments to characterize the action of phytochrome B on hypocotyl extension growth. A single R or FR pulse had no detectable effects on hypocotyl growth. After 24-h pre-treatment with continuous FR (FRc) a single R, compared to FR pulse inhibited (more than 70%) subsequent hypocotyl growth in the WT but not in the phyB-1 mutant. This effect of FRc was fluence-rate dependent and more efficient than continuous R (Rc) or hourly FR pulses of equal total fluence. Hypocotyl growth inhibition by Rc was larger in WT than phyB-1 seedlings when chlorophyll screening was reduced either by using broadband Rc (maximum emission 610 nm) or by using narrow-band Rc (658 nm) over short periods (24 h) or with seedlings bleached with Norflurazon. Hourly R or R + FR pulses had similar effects in WT and phyB-1 mutant etiolated seedlings. It is concluded that phytochrome B is not the only photoreceptor of Rc and that the action of phytochrome B is enhanced by a FRc high-irradiance reaction. Complementary experiments with the phyA-201 mutant indicate that this promotion of a phytochrome B-mediated response occurs via co-action with phytochrome A.Abbreviations D darkness - FR far-red light - FRc continuous FR - Pfr FR-absorbing form of phytochrome - HIR high-irradiance reaction - Pfr/P proportion of phytochrome as Pfr - phyA phytochrome A - phyB phytochrome B - R red light - Rc continuous R - WT wild-type I thank Professors R.E. Kendrick and M. Koornneef (Wageningen Agricultural University, The Netherlands) and Professor J. Chory (Salk Institute, Calif., USA) for their kind provision of the original WT and phyB-1 and phyA-201 seed, respectively. This work was financially supported by grants PID and PID-BID from CONICET, AG 040 from Universidad de Buenos Aires and A 12830/1-000019 from Fundación Antorchas.     

Blue-light promotion of flowering is absent in hy4 mutants of Arabidopsis

Loss of a blue-light photoreceptor in the hy4 mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh substantially delayed flowering (>100 d to flower vs. 40–50 d), especially with blue light exposure from lamps lacking much red (R) and/or far-red (FR) light. Red night breaks were promotory but flowering was still later for the hy4-101 mutant. However, with exposure to light from FR-rich lamps, flowering of all mutants was early and no different from the wild type. Thus, flowering of Arabidopsis involves a blue-light photoreceptor and other, often more effective photoreceptors. The latter may involve phytochrome photoresponses to R and FR, but with little or no phytochrome response to blue wavelengths.Abbreviations HIR high irradiance response - FR far-red - R red - WT wild type     

Phytochrome A enhances the promotion of hypocotyl growth caused by reductions in levels of phytochrome B in its far-red-light-absorbing form in light-grown Arabidopsis thaliana.

We sought to determine if phytochrome B (phyB)-mediated responses to the red light (R)/far-red light (FR) ratio are affected by phytochrome A (phyA) activity in light-grown seedlings of Arabidopsis thaliana. Pulses of FR delayed into the dark period were less effective than end-of-day (EOD) FR in promoting hypocotyl growth over a given period in darkness. White light minus blue light interposed instead of darkness between the end of the white-light photoperiod and the FR pulse was sufficient to maintain responsivity to the decrease in phyB in FR-light-absorbing form in wild-type (WT) seedlings, but not in the phyA mutant. Compared with EOD R, hourly R+FR pulses provided throughout the night caused a stronger promotion of stem growth than a single EOD R+FR pulse in WT Arabidopsis, cucumber, mustard, sunflower, tobacco, and tomato, but not in phyA Arabidopsis or in the aurea mutant of tomato. WT seedlings of Arabidopsis responded to a range of high EOD R/FR ratios, whereas the phyA mutant required stronger reductions in the EOD R/FR ratio. In sunlight, phyA seedlings of Arabidopsis showed no response to the "early warning" signals of neighboring vegetation, and hypocotyl-growth promotion occurred at higher plant densities than in the WT. Thus, under a series of light conditions, the sensitivity or responsivity to reductions in the R/FR ratio were larger in WT than in phyA seedlings. A product of phyA is therefore proposed to enhance the hypocotyl-growth response to decreases in phyB in FR-light-absorbing form in light grown seedlings.     

不同红光/远红光比例(R/FR)的光照影响番茄幼苗叶片中花青素合成的研究

硫灯或氙灯具有不同的红光／远红光比例(R／FR,前者为1．5,而后者为1)。研究结果表明,硫灯照射下生长的番茄幼苗叶片与太阳光下相似,能正常合成花青素;而氙灯照光生长的番茄幼苗叶片中的花青素合成受到严重抑制,通过分光光度法测定的花青素含量仅为前者的1／9。进一步在硫灯下培养红光／远红光受体(光敏素B族)单突变和双突变的番茄幼苗中,发现单突变体phyB1和双突变体phyB1phyB2的叶片花青素含量显著低于野生型,分别为野生型的1／3和1／15,由此推测花青素合成途径受到了红光／远红光比例的影响。HPLC结果又表明,硫灯和氙灯照光生长的番茄幼苗叶片中黄酮醇总量没有显著差异。我们推测氙灯下番茄幼苗花青素合成过程可能抑制位点是二氢黄酮醇还原酶或白花色素双氧酶两个催化步骤。     

Interactions of phytochromes A,B1 and B2 in light-induced competence for adventitious shoot formation in hypocotyl of tomato (<Emphasis Type="Italic">Solanum lycopersicum</Emphasis> L.)

The interactions of phytochrome A (phyA), phytochrome B1 (phyB1) and phytochrome B2 (phyB2) in light-dependent shoot regeneration from the hypocotyl of tomato was analysed using all eight possible homozygous allelic combinations of the null mutants. The donor plants were pre-grown either in the dark or under red or far-red light for 8 days after sowing; thereafter hypocotyl segments (apical, middle and basal portions) were transferred onto hormone-free medium for culture under different light qualities. Etiolated apical segments cultured in vitro under white light showed a very high frequency of regeneration for all of the genotypes tested besides phyB1phyB2, phyAphyB1 and phyAphyB1phyB2 mutants. Evidence is provided of a specific interference of phyB2 with phyA-mediated HIR to far-red and blue light in etiolated explants. Pre-treatment of donor plants by growth under red light enhanced the competence of phyB1phyB2, phyAphyB1 and phyAphyB1phyB2 mutants for shoot regeneration, whereas pre-irradiation with far-red light enhanced the frequency of regeneration only in the phyAphyB1 mutant. Multiple phytochromes are involved in red light- and far-red light-dependent acquisition of competence for shoot regeneration. The position of the segments along the hypocotyl influenced the role of the various phytochromes and the interactions between them. The culture of competent hypocotyl segments under red, far-red or blue light reduced the frequency of explants forming shoots compared to those cultured under white light, with different genotypes having different response patterns.Abbreviations HIR: High irradiance response - LFR: Low fluence response - Pfr: Far-red absorbing form of phytochrome - phyA: Phytochrome A - phyB1: Phytochrome B1 - phyB2: Phytochrome B2 - phyA(B1, B2): Phytochrome mutant deficient in phyA (B1, B2) - phyAphyB1(B1B2,AB2): Double phytochrome mutant deficient in phyA and phyB1(B1, B2) - phyAphyB1phyB2: Triple mutant deficient in phyA, phyB1 and phyB2 - VLFR: Very low fluence response - WT: Wild-type tomato Communicated by R. Reski     

The Induction of Seed Germination in Arabidopsis thaliana Is Regulated Principally by Phytochrome B and Secondarily by Phytochrome A

We examined whether spectrally active phytochrome A (PhyA) and phytochrome B (PhyB) play specific roles in the induction of seed germination in Arabidopsis thaliana (L.) Heynh., using PhyA- and PhyB-null mutants, fre1-1 (A. Nagatani, J.W. Reed, J. Chory [1993] Plant Physiol 102: 269-277) and hy3-Bo64 (J. Reed, P.Nagpal, D.S. Poole, M. Furuya, J. Chory [1993] Plant Cell 5: 147-157). When dormant seeds of each genotype imbibed in the dark on aqueous agar plates, the hy3 (phyB) mutant did not germinate, whereas the fre1 (phyA) mutant germinated at a rate of 50 to 60%, and the wild type (WT) germinated at a rate of 60 to 70%. By contrast, seeds of all genotypes germinated to nearly 100% when plated in continuous irradiation with white or red light. When plated in continuous far-red light, however, frequencies of seed germination of the WT and the fre1 and hy3 mutants averaged 14, nearly 0, and 47%, respectively, suggesting that PhyB in the red-absorbing form prevents PhyA-dependent germination under continuous far-red light. When irradiated briefly with red or far-red light after imbibition for 1 h, a typical photoreversible effect on seed germination was observed in the fre1 mutant and the WT but not in the hy3 mutant. In contrast, when allowed to imbibe in the dark for 24 to 48 h and exposed to red light, the seed germination frequencies of the hy3 mutant were more than 40%. Immunoblot analyses of the mutant seeds showed that PhyB apoprotein accumulated in dormant seeds of the WT and the fre1 mutant as much as in the seeds that had imbibed. In contrast, PhyA apoprotein, although detected in etiolated seedlings grown in the dark for 5 d, was not detectable in the dormant seeds of the WT and the hy3 mutant. The above physiological and immunochemical evidence indicates that PhyB in the far-red-absorbing form was stored in the Arabidopsis seeds and resulted in germination in the dark. Hence, PhyA does not play any role in dark germination but induces germination under continuous irradiation with far-red light. Finally, we examined seeds from a signal transduction mutant, det1, and a det1/hy3 double mutant. The det1 seeds exhibited photoreversible responses of germination on aqueous agar plates, and the det1/hy3 double mutant seeds did not. Hence, DET1 is likely to act in a distinct pathway from PhyB in the photoregulation of seed germination.     

Photoregulation of seed germination of wild-type and of an aurea-mutant of tomato

Seed germination of an aurea mutant of tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) is promoted by continuous irradiation with red, far-red or long-wavelength far-red (758 nm) light as well as by cyclic irradiations (5 min red or 5 min far-red/25 min darkness). Far-red light applied immediately after each red does not change the germination behaviour. Seed germination of the isogenic wild-type, cv. UC-105, is promoted by continuous and cyclic red light while it is inhibited by continuous and cyclic far-red light and by continious 758 nm irradiation. Far-red irradiation reverses almost completely the promoting effect of red light. The promoting effect (in the aurea mutant) and the inhibitory effect (in the wild-type) of continuous far-red light do not show photon fluence rate dependency above 20 nmol m⁻² s⁻¹. It is concluded that phytochrome controls tomato seed germination throgh low energy responses in both the wild type and the au mutant. The promoting effect of continuous and cyclic far-red light in the au mutant can be attributed to a greater sensitivity to P_fr.     

Negative interference of endogenous phytochrome B with phytochrome A function in Arabidopsis

To study negative interactions between phytochromes, phytochrome B (phyB) overexpressor lines, the mutants phyA-201, phyB-4, phyB-5, phyD-1, phyA-201 phyB-5, phyA-201 phyD-1, and phyB-5 phyD-1 of Arabidopsis were used. Endogenous phyB, but not phytochrome D (phyD), partly suppressed phytochrome A (phyA)-dependent inhibition of hypocotyl elongation in far-red light (FR). Dichromatic irradiation demonstrated that the negative effect of phyB was largely independent of the photoequilibrium, i.e. far-red light absorbing form of phytochrome formation. Moreover, phyB-4, a mutant impaired in signal transduction, did not show a loss of inhibition of phyA by phyB. Overexpression of phyB, conversely, resulted in an enhanced inhibition of phyA function, even in the absence of supplementary carbohydrates. However, overexpression of a mutated phyB, which cannot incorporate the chromophore, had no detectable effect on phyA action. In addition to seedling growth, accumulation of anthocyanins in FR, another manifestation of the high irradiance response, was strongly influenced by phyB holoprotein. Induction of seed germination by FR, a very low fluence response, was suppressed by both endogenous phyB and phyD. In conclusion, we show that both classical response modes of phyA, high irradiance response, and very low fluence response are subject to an inhibitory action of phyB-like phytochromes. Possible mechanisms of the negative interference are discussed.     

New lv Mutants of Pea Are Deficient in Phytochrome B

The lv-1 mutant of pea (Pisum sativum L.) is deficient in responses regulated by phytochrome B (phyB) in other species but has normal levels of spectrally active phyB. We have characterized three further lv mutants (lv-2, lv-3, and lv-4), which are all elongated under red (R) and white light but are indistinguishable from wild type under far-red light. The phyB apoprotein present in the lv-1 mutant was undetectable in all three new lv mutants. The identification of allelic mutants with and without phyB apoprotein suggests that Lv may be a structural gene for a B-type phytochrome. Furthermore, it indicates that the lv-1 mutation results specifically in the loss of normal biological activity of this phytochrome. Red-light-pulse and fluence-rate-response experiments suggest that lv plants are deficient in the low-fluence response (LFR) but retain a normal very-low-fluence-rate-dependent response for leaflet expansion and inhibition of stem elongation. Comparison of lv alleles of differing severity indicates that the LFR for stem elongation can be mediated by a lower level of phyB than the LFR for leaflet expansion. The retention of a strong response to continuous low-fluence-rate R in all four lv mutants suggests that there may be an additional phytochrome controlling responses to R in pea. The kinetics of phytochrome destruction and reaccumulation in the lv mutant indicate that phyB may be involved in the light regulation of phyA levels.