三种人全血基因组DNA提取方法的比较

目的：比较改良酚一氯仿抽提法、盐析法、试剂盒法从人全血中提取基因组DNA的效果,以期建立一种快速、经济的提取高质量基因组DNA的方法。方法：分别用上述三种方法从人全血中提取基因组DNA,通过紫外分光光度计、琼脂糖凝胶电泳、聚合酶链式反应（PCR）、限制性内切酶酶切检测提取的基因组DNA的产量、纯度和质量。结果：改良酚一氯仿抽提法与试剂盒法提取的基因组DNA相比,DNA的产量有统计学差异,DNA的纯度无统计学差异,但试剂盒法提取的基因组DNA有较明显的降解现象：盐析法与改良酚．氯仿抽提法、试剂盒法相比,基因组DNA的产量和纯度都存在统计学差异,并且基因组DNA聚合酶链式反应（PCR）扩增的稳定性也明显劣于另外两种方法;三种方法提取基因组DNA均能进行限制性内切核酸消化。结论：改良酚一氯仿抽据取法是一种经济、快速、高效、稳定提取人全血基因组DNA的方法,适用于批量临床标本处理。     

球形孢子丝菌DNA提取方法的比较

目的获得一种高效、快速、简便的提取球形孢子丝菌DNA的方法。方法以不同地区来源的球形孢子丝菌为实验材料,采用CTAB法、异硫氰酸胍法、试剂盒法、碱裂解法4种方法分别提取球形孢子丝菌DNA。通过紫外吸光度法测定DNA的浓度和纯度,琼脂糖凝胶电泳、PCR扩增评价DNA的质量。结果虽然不同方法均可得到球形孢子丝菌的DNA,但碱裂解法获得DNA的浓度和纯度明显优于其他3种方法。利用钙调蛋白基因的引物对DNA进行PCR扩增后,各样本均出现阳性条带,且条带亮度较好。结论碱裂解法是获得高质量球形孢子丝菌DNA的理想方法。     

人体蠕形螨的DNA提取与随机引物PCR检测

【目的】探索人体毛囊蠕形螨和皮脂蠕形螨DNA的提取方法。【方法】采用液氮反复冻融研磨法破碎螨体细胞, 选用改良小昆虫DNA提取法、碱裂解法和试剂盒提取法, 分别提取冻存时间在5个月内和8~10个月的毛囊蠕形螨和皮脂蠕形螨基因组DNA, 并用随机引物PCR方法进行检测。【结果】蛋白核酸测定仪检测结果显示, 试剂盒法提取的DNA纯度较高、量较多, 明显优于改良小昆虫法和碱裂解法。随机引物扩增结果显示清晰的DNA指纹图谱, 两种人体蠕形螨DNA指纹具有明显差异。蠕形螨冻存时间影响DNA提取的量, 但对DNA提取的纯度和RAPD指纹图谱影响较小。不同DNA提取方法提取的同一种蠕形螨DNA指纹图谱基本相似, 试剂盒法和改良小昆虫法提取的DNA样本条带多而清晰, 碱裂解法提取的样本条带少而模糊。【结论】液氮反复冻融研磨法破碎蠕形螨细胞是有效的, 蠕形螨冻存时间不宜超过6个月, 试剂盒提取法是提取蠕形螨DNA的好方法。RAPD技术可以用于这两种人体蠕形螨DNA分子水平上的检测和分类。     

八角莽草酸不同纯化方法的比较研究

利用重结晶、醇沉和柱层析等方法对八角莽草酸进行提取纯化,并比较了不同方法的纯化结果。结果表明:乙醇沉淀法的纯化效果明显,醇沉后进行硅胶柱或大孔树脂柱层析分离纯化莽草酸的效果都大为提高,纯度都达到82%以上。利用一种新的洗脱体系-乙酸乙酯和甲醇的混合溶剂,用于硅胶柱层析法纯化莽草酸,能将莽草酸与其近似物很好地分离,纯度达到94.6%,纯化的效果优于大孔树脂柱。最终确定了高效提取纯化莽草酸的工艺流程:微波提取——醇沉法初步纯化——柱层析法进一步纯化。     

植物DNA提取试剂盒的研究及在检测转基因稻米上的应用

本实验利用硅胶柱可很好地与DNA结合,胍盐可替代CTAB法中的有毒试剂,使用强碱作为基础裂解液,再使用胍盐中和,吸附DNA,实现快速提取稻米DNA等特性,自主研发提取稻米DNA试剂盒,通过与CTAB法、异丙醇沉淀法、SDS法等对照实验,证明新方法具有提取的DNA纯度更高、操作耗时更短、更安全、成本更低等优势。从3个省会超市中随机采购15种商品大米进行检测,发现有8个样品含有Bt基因,其中成都3个、武汉2个、福州3个,说明转抗虫基因稻米大量流入市场已是不争的事实。     

三种提取冬虫夏草菌丝体基因组DNA方法的比较

采用改良氯化苄法、CTAB法、蛋白酶K裂解法这三种方法,对冬虫夏草菌丝体基因组DNA进行提取,将提取的基因组DNA经过紫外分光光度计检测纯度和计算浓度、琼脂糖凝胶电泳分析及PCR扩增,结果表明,3种方法均能提取到符合分子生物学的DNA,其中蛋白酶K裂解法纯度最高,含蛋白质少,改良氯化苄法、CTAB法次之。而浓度则是改良氯化苄法最高,CTAB法、蛋白酶K裂解法次之。3种方法所提取的DNA均能扩增出理想条带。     

风沙土微生物总DNA不同提取和纯化方法比较

为筛选和建立风沙土中总DNA的提取和纯化方法,选取了5种直接提取法、1种间接提取法和2种纯化法分别对风沙土中总DNA进行了提取和纯化,并对其质量和产量进行了比较.结果表明：6种方法均可从风沙土中提取到大小为23 kb左右的总DNA,其中改进后的高盐提取法（用40%聚乙二醇8000和4 mol·L^-1 NaCl沉淀DNA）效果最好,纯化后总DNA的纯度最高,可进行16S rDNA的PCR扩增,且产量仅稍低于试剂盒提取法;电泳加柱回收纯化法的纯化效果较好,经该方法纯化后的总DNA大部分可进行PCR扩增,可满足后续分子操作对DNA纯度的要求.     

一种改进的异硫氰酸胍法结合硅胶膜离心吸附柱提取孕妇外周血微量胎儿RNA的方法

孕妇外周血中存在胎儿RNA为无创性产前诊断提供了基础.但血液中富含RNA酶和微量胎儿RNA的特点,对从孕妇血浆中提取胎儿RNA带来困难. 我们以ε血红蛋白基因和胎盘特异表达基因4（PLAC4）mRNA作为研究对象,用改进的异硫氰酸胍法结合硅胶膜离心吸附柱法探索孕妇外周血中胎儿微量RNA的提取方法,获得满意效果. 30例孕妇和9例非孕妇外周血样品中总RNA经凝胶电泳测定显示3条带,分别为28S, 18S和 5.8S. 其28S条带亮度为18S亮度的2倍.总RNA质量浓度（A260／A280）为1.97 g/L,光密度比值(A260-A320）/（A280- A 320）为1.86. 30例孕妇外周血样本有7例提取到ε血红蛋白基因mRNA,ε血红蛋白基因 mRNA 的最小浓度为0.537 μg/mL,最大浓度为1.79 μg/mL,ε血红蛋白基因mRNA的浓度中位数为124 μg/mL. 30例孕妇外周血样本提取到PLAC4 基因mRNA,浓度最小值为2.105×103 copies/mL,最大值为12.760×103 copies/mL,而9例非孕妇中均未提取到（P＜0.01）,浓度中位数为6.612×103 copies/mL. 因此,改进的异硫氰酸胍法与硅胶膜离心吸附柱纯化法相结合,可有效抑制RNA降解,用于提取、纯化孕妇血液中微量胎儿RNA.     

木棉基因组DNA提取方法的比较研究

木棉组织细胞含有多酚类、糖类、萜类化合物和其他次生代谢物质,很难得到高质量的基因组DNA。为了获得高质量的木棉基因组DNA,本实验以两个不同地方采集的木棉成熟叶片为材料,采用CTAB法、SDS法、普通试剂盒、磁珠法试剂盒以及对以上4种方法进行改良后的4种方法,提取总的木棉DNA。通过微量紫外-分光光度计、琼脂糖电泳对所提取DNA的纯度、得率,毒害及耗时等方面进行了比较。结果表明:经改良后提取的DNA质量都有所提高,且改良的磁珠法试剂盒效果最佳,可直接用于下游分子生物学实验。     

木棉基因组DNA提取方法的比较研究

木棉组织细胞含有多酚类、糖类、萜类化合物和其他次生代谢物质,很难得到高质量的基因组DNA。为了获得高质量的木棉基因组DNA,本实验以两个不同地方采集的木棉成熟叶片为材料,采用CTAB法、SDS法、普通试剂盒、磁珠法试剂盒以及对以上4种方法进行改良后的4种方法,提取总的木棉DNA。通过微量紫外-分光光度计、琼脂糖电泳对所提取DNA的纯度、得率,毒害及耗时等方面进行了比较。结果表明:经改良后提取的DNA质量都有所提高,且改良的磁珠法试剂盒效果最佳,可直接用于下游分子生物学实验。     

Evaluation of six methods for extraction and purification of viral DNA from urine and serum samples

The sensitivity and reliability of PCR for diagnostic and research purposes require efficient unbiased procedures of extraction and purification of nucleic acids. One of the major limitations of PCR-based tests is the inhibition of the amplification process by substances present in clinical samples. This study used specimens spiked with a known amount of plasmid pBKV (ATCC 33-1) to compare six methods for extraction and purification of viral DNA from urine and serum samples based on recovery efficiency in terms of yield of DNA and percentage of plasmid pBKV recovered, purity of extracted DNA, and percentage of inhibition. The most effective extraction methods were the phenol/chloroform technique and the silica gel extraction procedure for urine and serum samples, respectively. Considering DNA purity, the silica gel extraction procedure and the phenol/chloroform method produced the most satisfactory results in urine and serum samples, respectively. The presence of inhibitors was overcome by all DNA extraction techniques in urine samples, as evidenced by semiquantitative PCR amplification. In serum samples, the lysis method and the proteinase K procedure did not completely overcome the presence of inhibitors.     

A comparison of methods for extracting DNA from Coxiella burnetii as measured by a duplex qPCR assay

Aims: To determine the optimal DNA extraction method for the detection of Coxiella burnetii including the small‐cell variant (SCV) by real‐time PCR (qPCR) in clinical samples. Methods and Results: A duplex qPCR detecting two Coxiella burnetii gene targets (com1 and IS1111a genes) was developed. Each target in this PCR had a sensitivity of one copy number per reaction. DNA extraction methods were compared on spiked negative samples and included a silica column kit, a chloroform separation prior to a silica column method and a chloroform/phenol separation and DNA precipitation method. Conclusions: The silica column extraction method was more efficient at recovering C. burnetii DNA, from large‐cell and small‐cell variants, than a chloroform or chloroform/phenol method. The silica column method was useful on spiked human samples including serum, buffy coat and bone marrow samples. Significance and impact of study: This study demonstrated that a simple column kit method is efficient to use for the detection of C. burnetii in clinical samples including the SCV.     

铜藻岩藻黄素提取及纯化工艺研究

为了对岩藻黄素的提取、纯化进行系统研究,进而为高纯度岩藻黄素的工业化生产提供研究基础,筛选了适用于提取铜藻（Sargassum horneri）鲜藻中岩藻黄素的有机溶剂,并通过单因素实验和正交实验确定了最佳的提取溶剂浓度、提取温度、提取时间、料液比等工艺参数。随后采用硅胶柱层析法进行纯化,并通过单因素实验确定了最佳的硅胶柱床高度、上样量和洗脱流速。最后采用制备液相法对经层析纯化的岩藻黄素进一步纯化。结果表明,有机溶剂萃取的最佳工艺条件为：甲醇浓度90%,提取温度50 ℃,提取时间1 h,料液比1∶10,此条件下岩藻黄素提取率达到(0.258 9±0.003 6) mg·g-1鲜重（FW）［(1.078 8±0.015 0) mg·g-1干重（DW）］。硅胶柱层析的最佳工艺条件为：硅胶柱床高度10 cm,上样量6 g,洗脱流速10 mL·min-1,此条件下岩藻黄素得率为0.176 5 mg·g-1FW（0.735 3 mg·g-1 DW）,纯度为87.01%±0.88%。经制备液相进一步纯化后,岩藻黄素得率为0.127 1 mg·g-1 FW（0.529 4 mg·g-1 DW）,纯度为99.27%±0.22%。研究所用工艺简单,岩藻黄素得率高,为高纯度岩藻黄素的制备提供了实验基础。     

一种快速、经济提取外周凝血基因组DNA方法的建立

目的：建立一种经济、快速且高质量提取人体外周凝血DNA的方法。方法：摸索最佳的匀浆条件,对外周凝血块进行匀浆,采用Ⅺ法对匀浆液进行基因组DNA的提取,通过凝胶电泳、单重PCR和多重PCR检测凝血基因组DNA的提取产量和质量。并分别与常规的凝血基因组DNA提取方法,即蛋白酶K消化法,以及提取抗凝血基因组DNA的Ⅺ法进行比较分析。结果：最佳的匀浆条件为：39000map,15秒。在此条件下提取的基因组DNA完整性好,纯度和产量与蛋白酶K消化法提取凝血DNA和KI法提取抗凝血DNA的结果相比,没有统计学差异。单重PCR和多重PCR也获得了理想的扩增结果。结论：与常规的外周凝血提取方法相比（蛋白酶K消化法）,本方法节省了时间和成本,能快速、经济、有效地提取外周凝血基因组DNA,可用于后续的科研和临床诊断需要,解决了部分科研机构血液基因组DNA的样本来源问题。     

Comparison of DNA isolation using salting-out procedure and automated isolation (MagNA system)

Isolation of genomic DNA is a key step in genetic analysis. The aim of the study was to evaluate the suitability of isolation of DNA from peripheral blood with manual salting-out procedure and automated MagNA system under specific conditions. The impact of storage conditions, type of material (whole blood or blood cells), and method used for DNA extraction were evaluated in terms of DNA yield, its purity, and integrity. Fresh material, and material stored at 2–8°C for 1–4 weeks and frozen at ?80°C were tested. For fresh samples, salting-out method gives higher yield than MagNA, irrespectively, on material used. Neither the yield of salting-out method nor its purity decreases during the storage of the samples in the fridge (2–8°C) during 4 weeks. Concerning MagNA, storage of blood cells in the fridge decreases the yield of DNA as well as its purity. For frozen samples, for whole blood, MagNA gives better results while for blood cells, salting-out method seems to be better. For fresh samples, salting-out method is the preferred one, and both whole blood and blood cells can be used. For frozen samples, the preferred method depends on the material.     

A comparison of five methods for extraction of bacterial DNA from human faecal samples

The purity of DNA extracted from faecal samples is a key issue in the sensitivity and usefulness of biological analyses such as PCR for infectious pathogens and non-pathogens. We have compared the relative efficacy of extraction of bacterial DNA (both Gram negative and positive origin) from faeces using four commercial kits (FastDNA kit, Bio 101; Nucleospin C+T kit, Macherey-Nagal; Quantum Prep Aquapure Genomic DNA isolation kit, Bio-Rad; QIAamp DNA stool mini kit, Qiagen) and a non-commercial guanidium isothiocyanate/silica matrix method. Human faecal samples were spiked with additional known concentrations of Lactobacillus acidophilus or Bacteroides uniformis, the DNA was then extracted by each of the five methods, and tested in genus-specific PCRs. The Nucleospin method was the most sensitive procedure for the extraction of DNA from a pure bacterial culture of Gram-positive L. acidophilus (10(4) bacteria/PCR), and QIAamp and the guanidium method were most sensitive for cultures of Gram-negative B. uniformis (10(3) bacteria/PCR). However, for faecal samples, the QIAamp kit was the most effective extraction method and led to the detection of bacterial DNA over the greatest range of spike concentrations for both B. uniformis and L. acidophilus in primary PCR reactions. A difference in extraction efficacy was observed between faecal samples from different individuals. The use of appropriate DNA extraction kits or methods is critical for successful and valid PCR studies on clinical, experimental or environmental samples and we recommend that DNA extraction techniques are carefully selected with particular regard to the specimen type.     

4种黑曲霉基因组DNA提取方法的比较

目的:筛选适合提取曲霉DNA的方法.方法:比较2个菌落培养时间段(3d内和10d左右)提取DNA质量的差异;运用氯化苄法、石英砂+CTAB法、Biospin法和微波法分别提取黑曲霉基因组DNA,然后用直接电泳、浓度测定、PCR扩增等方法比较所提DNA的浓度和质量.结果:培养3d内的菌落提取的DNA纯度较高,无需纯化即可用于后续实验;4种方法制备的DNA均可用于PCR等后续实验,其中以石英砂+CTAB法提取的DNA纯度好,产率最高.结论石英砂+CTAB法是一种适用于曲霉DNA提取的简便方法.     

Evaluating genomic DNA extraction methods from human whole blood using endpoint and real-time PCR assays

The extraction of genomic DNA is the crucial first step in large-scale epidemiological studies. Though there are many popular DNA isolation methods from human whole blood, only a few reports have compared their efficiencies using both end-point and real-time PCR assays. Genomic DNA was extracted from coronary artery disease patients using solution-based conventional protocols such as the phenol–chloroform/proteinase-K method and a non-phenolic non-enzymatic Rapid-Method, which were evaluated and compared vis-a-vis a commercially available silica column-based Blood DNA isolation kit. The appropriate method for efficiently extracting relatively pure DNA was assessed based on the total DNA yield, concentration, purity ratios (A₂₆₀/A₂₈₀ and A₂₆₀/A₂₃₀), spectral profile and agarose gel electrophoresis analysis. The quality of the isolated DNA was further analysed for PCR inhibition using a murine specific ATP1A3 qPCR assay and mtDNA/Y-chromosome ratio determination assay. The suitability of the extracted DNA for downstream applications such as end-point SNP genotyping, was tested using PCR-RFLP analysis of the AGTR1-1166A>C variant, a mirSNP having pharmacogenetic relevance in cardiovascular diseases. Compared to the traditional phenol–chloroform/proteinase-K method, our results indicated the Rapid-Method to be a more suitable protocol for genomic DNA extraction from human whole blood in terms of DNA quantity, quality, safety, processing time and cost. The Rapid-Method, which is based on a simple salting-out procedure, is not only safe and cost-effective, but also has the added advantage of being scaled up to process variable sample volumes, thus enabling it to be applied in large-scale epidemiological studies.     

Efficiency of DNA extraction methods on the evaluation of soil microeukaryotic diversity

The evaluation of microbial molecular diversity has been mainly based on the extraction of total DNA from environmental samples. The indirect extraction methods, which have been used for prokaryotes, have never been used to recover soil microeukaryotic DNA. We evaluated the efficiency of an improved indirect DNA extraction protocol developed herein and the direct lysis (the sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)-based method and commercial DNA extraction kit) on estimating the molecular diversity of soil microbial eukaryotes. DNA quality and quantity as well as denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) profiles were determined using three soil samples from different stations. The indirect method detected the highest DGGE bands in spite of the low DNA yield. The commercial kit detected a lower number of DGGE bands than the indirect method. The SDS-based method produced the lowest DGGE bands and DNA purity but the highest yield. Using the indirect method, we further evaluated the effect of freezing and air-dried preservations on estimating the microeukaryotic diversity. In spite of the low DNA yield obtained from the air-dried preservation, no significant differences were found in either the number of DGGE bands or the DNA purity between two manners. Our results indicate that the improved indirect method could obtain a high purity of intracellular DNA and high efficiency in the estimation of molecular diversity of soil microbial eukaryotes.