Addressing the theoretical and clinical advantages of combination therapy with inhibitors of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system: Antihypertensive effects and benefits beyond BP control

AimsThis article reviews the importance of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) in the cardiometabolic continuum; presents the pros and cons of dual RAAS blockade with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs); and examines the theoretical and practical benefits supporting the use of direct renin inhibitors (DRIs) in combination with ACEIs or ARBs.Main methodsThe author reviewed the literature for key publications related to the biochemical physiology of the RAAS and the pharmacodynamic effects of ACEIs, ARBs, and DRIs, with a particular focus on dual RAAS blockade with these drug classes.Key findingsAlthough ACEI/ARB combination therapy produces modest improvement in BP, it has not resulted in the major improvements predicted given the importance of the RAAS across the cardiorenal disease continuum. This may reflect the fact that RAAS blockade with ACEIs and/or ARBs leads to exacerbated renin release through loss of negative-feedback inhibition, as well as ACE/aldosterone escape through RAAS and non-RAAS-mediated mechanisms. Plasma renin activity (PRA) is an independent predictor of morbidity and mortality, even for patients receiving ACEIs and ARBs. When used alone or in combination with ACEIs and ARBs, the DRI aliskiren effectively reduces PRA. Reductions in BP are greater with these combinations, relative to the individual components alone.SignificanceIt is possible that aliskiren plus either an ACEI or ARB may provide greater RAAS blockade than monotherapy with ACEIs or ARBs, and lead to additive improvement in BP and clinically important outcomes.     

New Digital Health Technologies for Insulin Initiation and Optimization for People With Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveThe health and economic burden of type 2 diabetes is of global significance. Many people with type 2 diabetes eventually need insulin to help reduce their risk of serious associated complications. However, barriers to the initiation and/or optimization of insulin expose people with diabetes to sustained hyperglycemia. In this review, we investigated how new and future technologies may provide opportunities to help overcome these barriers to the initiation and/or optimization of insulin.MethodsA focused literature search of PubMed and key scientific congresses was conducted. Software tools and devices developed to support the initiation and/or optimization of insulin were identified by manually filtering >300 publications and conference abstracts.ResultsMost software tools have been developed for smartphone platforms. At present, published data suggest that the use of these technologies is associated with equivalent or improved glycemic outcomes compared with standard care, with additional benefits such as reduced time burden and improved knowledge of diabetes among health care providers. However, there remains paucity of good-quality evidence. Most new devices to support insulin therapy help track the dose and timing of insulin.ConclusionNew digital health tools may help to reduce barriers to optimal insulin therapy. An integrated solution that connects glucose monitoring, dose recording, and titration advice as well as records comorbidities and lifestyle factors has the potential to reduce the complexity and burden of treatment and may improve adherence to titration and treatment, resulting in better outcomes for people with diabetes.     

Endocrine-Metabolic Pathophysiologic Conditions and Treatment Approaches After Kidney Transplantation

ObjectiveTo review pathophysiologic conditions and diagnostic and therapeutic approaches in the management of endocrine-metabolic disorders after kidney transplanta tion (KT).MethodsWe discuss the assessment of diabetes mel litus (DM), hyperlipidemia, hypertension, and disturbances of bone and mineral metabolism after KT.ResultsKT offers patients with end-stage kidney disease substantial improvement in life expectancy and quality of life. Despite amelioration of renal dysfunction, however, these patients are at risk for the deterioration of existing and the development of new endocrine pathologic conditions. Pretransplant DM and new-onset diabetes after transplantation are associated with worse patient and graft survival. Little is known about preventing new-onset dia betes after transplantation and managing DM shortly after KT. In addition to glycemic control in patients with dia betes, management of cardiovascular risk factors includes appropriate recognition and treatment of hypertension and dyslipidemia. After KT, patients are at considerable risk for derangements in calcium and vitamin D metabolism. Immunosuppressive medications may cause compromised glucose and lipid metabolism, which may, in turn, contrib ute to the progression of preexisting and the development of new posttransplant endocrinopathies.ConclusionClinical care of kidney transplant patients should include a comprehensive endocrine assessment before and after KT in close collaboration with transplant nephrology providers. A referral to an endocrinologist should be initiated early during the pretransplant stage, and collaborative management should be maintained in kidney transplant patients to improve clinical outcomes. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:579-590)     

Increase in the Number of Pediatric New-Onset Diabetes and Diabetic Ketoacidosis Cases During the COVID-19 Pandemic

ObjectiveInfection with SARS-CoV-2 induces a proinflammatory state that causes hyperglycemia and may precipitate diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) in patients with known or new-onset diabetes. We examined the trends in new-onset diabetes and DKA prior to and following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsThis single-center retrospective observational study included pediatric patients (aged 0 to <18 years) hospitalized with new-onset type 1 diabetes or type 2 diabetes (T2D) before (March 1, 2018, to February 29, 2020) and after (March 1, 2020 to December 31, 2020) the pandemic onset. Demographic, anthropometrics, laboratory and clinical data, and outcomes were obtained.ResultsAmong 615 children admitted with new-onset diabetes during the entire study period, 401 were admitted before the pandemic onset, and 214 were admitted after the pandemic onset. Children admitted with new-onset diabetes in the postpandemic period were significantly more likely to present with DKA (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.52) than in the prepandemic phase. Children with DKA after the pandemic onset had higher lengths of hospitalization and were significantly more likely to experience severe DKA (odds ratio, 2.17; 95% confidence interval, 1.34-3.52). A higher proportion of children with DKA admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit required oxygen support after the pandemic onset than before the pandemic onset (8.85% vs 1.92%). Most cases of T2D with DKA occurred following the onset of the pandemic (62.5%).ConclusionA significant increase in T2D cases occurred following the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic with a greater risk of DKA and severe ketoacidosis. Racial disparity was evident with a higher proportion of Black and American Indian children presenting with ketoacidosis following the pandemic onset.     

A Bridge to Insulin Pump Therapy: Twice-Daily Regimen with NPH and Detemir Insulins During Initial Treatment of Youth with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo describe clinical outcomes in youth with new-onset type 1 diabetes mellitus (TlDM) treated with a modified, twice-daily regimen of a mixture of NPH insulin and rapid-acting insulin analogue at breakfast and separate injections of rapid-acting insulin analogue and insulin detemir at dinner.MethodsOur clinic database was used to describe changes in insulin doses, hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) levels, and frequency of severe hypoglycemia during the first year of therapy in young patients with T1DM diagnosed between September 2006 and April 2009. Data are presented as median values (25%, 75%).ResultsOverall, 108 patients (62 girls; mean age, 10.0 ± 0.4 years) were eligible for inclusion. Total daily insulin doses at 3, 6, and 12 months were 0.6 (0.4, 0.8), 0.7 (0.4, 0.9), and 0.8 (0.6, 0.9) U/kg, respectively. A1C levels were 9.8% (8.5%, 10.8%) at 2 weeks (baseline). Of the 108 patients, 19 had switched to insulin pump therapy by 3 months and 49 had switched by 12 months after initial diagnosis of T1DM. The 49 pump-treated patients had an A1C of 6.9% (6.6%, 7.3%), whereas the 59 injection- treated patients had an A1C of 7.2% (6.7%, 7.7%) by 12 months. There were only 6 severe hypoglycemic events in 5 patients; none occurred during the first 3 months, none occurred during the night, and all occurred in patients receiving insulin injection treatment.ConclusionA twice-daily insulin regimen that uses insulin detemir for overnight basal replacement and morning NPH insulin to avoid lunch and afternoon snack doses is an effective initial treatment for young patients with new-onset T1DM that can provide a smooth transition to intensive basal/bolus insulin pump therapy. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:862-866)     

Insulin Resistance and Thrombogenesis: Recent Insights and Therapeutic Implications

ObjectiveTo review the relationship between insulin resistance and thrombogenesis, especially in the context of obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease, and to discuss therapeutic implications.MethodsThe pertinent peer-reviewed literature was examined for evidence in support of the aforementioned relationship, and the reported efficacy of various therapeutic interventions was assessed.ResultsRobust evidence indicates that insulin resistance and enhanced thrombogenesis are closely related pathophysiologic mechanisms, especially in the presence of obesity. Thus, targeting insulin resistance and thrombogenesis may be of value in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes and associated cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Many proven preventive and therapeutic strategies, such as weight loss, exercise, and various pharmaceutical agents, affect both thrombogenesis and insulin resistance.ConclusionBoth insulin resistance and thrombogenesis contribute to the morbidity and mortality associated with obesity, diabetes, and cardiovascular disease. Effective measures for prevention and management of diabetes and cardiovascular disease also tend to improve insulin sensitivity and to ameliorate abnormalities in coagulation, fibrinolysis, and platelet function. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:679-686)     

Chromium Effects on Glucose Tolerance and Insulin Sensitivity in Persons at Risk for Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo investigate the effects of daily chromium picolinate supplementation on serum measures of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in patients at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsWe conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, modified cross-over clinical trial with 6-month sequences of intervention and placebo followed by a 6-month postintervention assessment. Adult patients with impaired fasting glucose, impaired glucose tolerance, or metabolic syndrome were enrolled. Participants received 6-month sequences of chromium picolinate or placebo at 1 of 2 dosages (500 or 1000 mcg daily). Primary outcome measures were change in fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour plasma glucose during oral glucose tolerance testing, fasting and 2-hour insulin, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Secondary outcomes included anthropometric measures, blood pressure, endothelial function, hemoglobin A_1c, lipids, and urinary microalbumin.ResultsFifty-nine participants were enrolled. No changes were seen in glucose level, insulin level, or HOMA-IR (all P > .05) after 6 months of chromium at either dosage level (500 mcg or 1000 mcg daily) when compared with placebo. None of the secondary outcomes improved with either chromium dosage compared with placebo (P > .05).ConclusionsChromium supplementation does not appear to ameliorate insulin resistance or impaired glucose metabolism in patients at risk for type 2 diabetes and thus is unlikely to attenuate diabetes risk. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:16-25)     

肾素 - 血管紧张素 - 醛固酮系统阻滞的研究进展

肾素-血管紧张素-醛固酮系统起初被认为是较简单的神经体液调节机制之一。但是,这一想法随着RAAS阻滞剂:肾素阻滞剂、血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂(ACEI)、AT1受体拮抗剂及盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂的深入研究而受到挑战。因此,RAAS的组成、以上药物发挥作用的具体通路及副作用均得到重新定义。在RAAS阻滞剂的应用过程中,机体肾素水平升高,并刺激肾素原受体(即无活性的肾素前体,PRR),进而对机体造成不良影响。同理,在AT1受体拮抗剂的应用过程中,血浆血管紧张素II的水平升高,并与2型血管紧张素II(AT2)受体结合,进而对机体产生有利作用。此外,随着ACEI及ARB的应用,血管紧张素1-7水平升高,其与Mas受体结合,发挥心脏及肾脏保护的作用,还可通过刺激干细胞发挥组织修复作用。     

门冬胰岛素、地特胰岛素、甘精胰岛素分别联合二甲双胍对糖尿病孕妇妊娠结局的影响

摘要 目的：探究门冬胰岛素、地特胰岛素、甘精胰岛素分别联合二甲双胍对糖尿病孕妇妊娠结局的影响。方法：随机抽取本院400例妊娠期糖尿病产妇为研究对象，按照简单随机法分为对照组（n=100例）、试验A组（n=100例）、试验B组（n=100例）和试验C组（n=100例）。对照组采用口服二甲双胍治疗，试验A、B、C组，分别采用门冬胰岛素、地特胰岛素、甘精胰岛素联合二甲双胍治疗。对比四组产妇的分娩方式，各产程时间，体重指数（BMI）、随机血糖、内脂素、脂联素的水平，妊娠并发症发生率，新生儿结局。结果：试验A、B、C组的自然分娩率均高于对照组（P<0.05），且试验A组的自然分娩率均高于试验B组、试验C组（P<0.05），试验B组、试验C组的自然分娩率对比无差异（P>0.05）；对照组、试验A、B、C组自然分娩产妇的第一产程、第二产程、第三产程时间对比无差异（P>0.05）；试验A、B、C组的BMI指数、随机血糖、内脂素、脂联素的水平均低于对照组（P<0.05），且试验A组的BMI指数、随机血糖、内脂素、脂联素的水平均低于试验B组、试验C组（P<0.05），试验B组、试验C组的BMI指数、随机血糖、内脂素、脂联素的水平对比无差异（P>0.05）；试验A、B、C组的妊娠并发症发生率均低于对照组（P<0.05），且试验A组的妊娠并发症发生率低于试验B组、试验C组（P<0.05），试验B组、试验C组的妊娠并发症发生率对比无差异（P>0.05）；试验A、B、C组的新生儿不良结局发生率均低于对照组（P<0.05），且试验A组的新生儿不良结局发生率低于试验B组、试验C组（P<0.05），试验B组、试验C组的新生儿不良结局发生率对比无差异（P>0.05）。结论：门冬胰岛素、地特胰岛素、甘精胰岛素分别联合二甲双胍均能够提高糖尿病孕妇妊娠的自然分娩率，降低BMI指数、随机血糖、内脂素、脂联素的水平，降低妊娠并发症发生率，改良新生儿不良结局，其中门冬胰岛素的疗效最好，具有较强的临床推广价值。     

Development of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in the Obese Adolescent:A Growing Challenge

ObjectiveTo describe the metabolic phenotype of type 2 diabetes mellitus in youth and possible metabolic defects leading to its development with particular emphasis on fatty liver.MethodsWe present data gathered from studies performed in obese adolescents across the spectrum of glucose tolerance to assess both alterations in insulin sensitivity and secretion. Discussion regarding treatment options is presented using the data from the Treatment Options for Type 2 Diabetes in Adolescents and Youth (TODAY) study.ResultsAs the number of children with obesity continues to grow, the health implications of the condition are becoming increasingly evident. An unprecedented phenomenon rarely seen before has emerged: type 2 diabetes mellitus. At the time of diabetes diagnosis, cardiovascular disease may already be present, even in young adults. The progression from normal glucose tolerance to type 2 diabetes in adults occurs through an intermediate phase of altered glucose metabolism known as impaired glucose tolerance or prediabetes. Previous studies from our group and others reported a high prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance among children and adolescents with marked obesity. Cross-sectional studies demonstrate that impaired glucose tolerance in obese youth is associated with severe insulin resistance, β-cell dysfunction, and altered abdominal and muscle fat partitioning. We end briefly by discussing the current data available on treatment of this condition from the TODAY study, the largest clinical trial ever performed in youth with type 2 diabetes.ConclusionThe observed rapid progression of the glucose homeostasis alterations in adolescents underlines the importance of focusing attention on the earliest stages of the disease before the onset of any alterations in glucose tolerance. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:791-795)     

Insulin Glargine or Neutral Protamine Hagedorn in Patients with Severe Insulin Resistance: is There A Benefit?

ObjectiveTo determine the benefit of neutral protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin compared with insulin glargine in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus and severe insulin resistance.MethodsWe describe the patient’s clinical findings and treatment course.ResultsA 52-year-old man with a 3-year history of type 2 diabetes mellitus did not achieve adequate glucose control despite escalation of his treatment regimen to insulin glargine, 80 units twice daily; insulin lispro, 60 units before each meal; and metformin. Dietary and lifestyle changes were emphasized and implemented while medication adherence with appropriate insulin technique was reviewed at each visit. Insulin glargine was replaced with the same dosage of NPH insulin. After 3 months, a significant drop in hemoglobin A_1c was noted, from 9.5% to 6.1%, consistent with the improved capillary glucose measurements. The effect was maintained over the following year, without any major hypoglycemic events.ConclusionNPH insulin might be superior to the long-acting analogue insulin glargine in cases of severe insulin resistance, but randomized studies are needed to confirm our finding and clarify the involved mechanisms. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:e49-e51)     

Glycemic Control After Hospital Discharge in Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized Pilot Study of Daily Remote Glucose Monitoring

ObjectiveLittle is known about glycemic control in type 2 diabetes patients treated with insulin in the high-risk period between hospital discharge and follow-up. We sought to assess the impact of remote glucose monitoring on postdischarge glycemic control and insulin titration.MethodsWe randomly assigned 28 hospitalized type 2 diabetes patients who were discharged home on insulin therapy to routine specialty care (RSC) or RSC with daily remote glucose monitoring (RGM). We compared the primary outcome of mean blood glucose and exploratory outcomes of hypoglycemia/hyperglycemia rates, change in hemoglobin A_1c and glycated albumin, and insulin titration frequency between groups.ResultsMean blood glucose was not significantly different between the treatment arms (144 ± 34 mg/dL in the RSC group and 172 ± 41 mg/dL in the RGM group; not significant), nor were there significant differences in any of the other measures of glycemia during the month after discharge. Hypoglycemia (glucometer reading < 60 mg/dL) was common, occurring in 46% of subjects, with no difference between groups. In as-treated analysis, insulin dose adjustments (29% with an increase and 43% with decrease in insulin dose) occurred more frequently in the patients who used RGM (average of 2.8 vs. 1.2 dose adjustments; P = .03).ConclusionIn this pilot trial in insulin-treated type 2 diabetes, RGM did not affect glycemic control after hospital discharge; however, the high rate of hypoglycemia in the postdischarge transition period and the higher frequency of insulin titration in patients who used RGM suggest a safety role for such monitoring in the transition from hospital to home. (Endocr Pract. 2015;21:115-121)     

Atypical Diabetes Mellitus Associated with Bone Marrow Transplantation

ObjectiveTo describe 3 cases of atypical diabetes mellitus following bone marrow transplantation.MethodsWe describe the clinical presentation and relevant laboratory findings of 3 patients who presented with new-onset diabetes mellitus after bone marrow transplantation and discuss the possible mechanisms.ResultsA 52-year-old white man with chronic myelogenous leukemia, a 51-year-old white woman with acute myelogenous leukemia, and a 38-year-old Hispanic woman with acute myelogenous leukemia presented with acute onset of diabetes mellitus after bone marrow transplantation. Although blood glucose levels were initially very high, the patients required only small insulin dosages for glycemic control. Both the acute onset and requirement of relatively small insulin dosages were characteristic of type 1 diabetes mellitus. Onset of diabetes appeared to be unrelated to immunosuppressive drug therapy because it happened several months after starting these drugs. C-peptide was detectable, and glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies were absent. Diabetes mellitus remitted spontaneously after a few months while the immunosuppressive drugs were continued.ConclusionAlthough the underlying mechanisms are unknown, cytokine changes after bone marrow transplantation may have led to temporary b-cell dysfunction in these patients. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:93-96)     

Potential utility of telmisartan, an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker with peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma)-modulating activity for the treatment of cardiometabolic disorders

The metabolic syndrome is strongly associated with insulin resistance and consists of a constellation of factors such as hypertension and hyperlipidemia that raise the risk for cardiovascular diseases and diabetes mellitus. There is widespread agreement that the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease in diabetes. Indeed, large clinical trials have demonstrated substantial benefit of the blockade of this system for cardiovascular end-organ protection. Thus the blockade of the RAS may be a promising strategy for the treatment of the patients with the metabolic syndrome. Although several types of angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor blockers (ARBs) are commercially available for the treatment of patients with hypertension, we have recently found that telmisartan (Micardis) could have the strongest binding affinity to AT(1) receptor. Further, telmisartan is reported to act as a partial agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-gamma). These observations suggest that, due to its unique PPAR-gamma-modulating activity, telmisartan may be one of the most promising sartans for the treatment of cardiometabolic disorders. In this paper, we reviewed the potential utility of telmisartan in insulin resistance and vascular complications in diabetes.     

Hyperinsulinemic rats are normotensive but sensitized to angiotensin II

The effect of insulin on blood pressure (BP) is debated, and an involvement of an activated renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) has been suggested. We studied the effect of chronic insulin infusion on telemetry BP and assessed sympathetic activity and dependence of the RAAS. Female Sprague-Dawley rats received insulin (2 units/day, INS group, n = 12) or insulin combined with losartan (30 mg.kg(-1).day(-1), INS+LOS group, n = 10), the angiotensin II receptor antagonist, for 6 wk. Losartan-treated (LOS group, n = 10) and untreated rats served as controls (n = 11). We used telemetry to measure BP and heart rate (HR), and acute ganglion blockade and air-jet stress to investigate possible control of BP by the sympathetic nervous system. In addition, we used myograph technique to study vascular function ex vivo. The INS and INS+LOS groups developed euglycemic hyperinsulinemia. Insulin did not affect BP but increased HR (27 beats/min on average). Ganglion blockade reduced mean arterial pressure (MAP) similarly in all groups. Air-jet stress did not increase sympathetic reactivity but rather revealed possible blunting of the stress response in hyperinsulinemia. Chronic losartan markedly reduced 24-h-MAP in the INS+LOS group (-38 +/- 1 mmHg P < 0.001) compared with the LOS group (-18 +/- 1 mmHg, P 相似文献   

Comparison of cardiovascular risk between patients with type 2 diabetes and those who had had a myocardial infarction: cross sectional and cohort studies

ObjectiveTo compare risks of cardiovascular outcomes between patients with type 2 diabetes and patients with established coronary heart disease.DesignCross sectional study and cohort study using routinely collected datasets.SettingTayside, Scotland (population 400 000) during 1988-95.SubjectsIn the cross sectional study, among patients aged 45-64, 1155 with type 2 diabetes were compared with 1347 who had had a myocardial infarction in the preceding 8 years. In the cohort study 3477 patients of all ages with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes were compared with 7414 patients who had just had a myocardial infarction.ResultsIn the cross sectional study the adjusted risk ratio for death from all causes was 2.27 (95% confidence interval 1.82 to 2.83) for patients who had had myocardial infarction compared with those with diabetes, and the risk ratio for hospital admission for myocardial infarction was 1.33 (1.14 to 1.55). In the cohort study, patients who had just had a myocardial infarction had a higher risk of death from all causes (adjusted risk ratio 1.35 (1.25 to 1.44)), cardiovascular death (2.93 (2.54 to 3.41)), and hospital admission for myocardial infarction (3.10 (2.57 to 3.73)).ConclusionsPatients with type 2 diabetes were at lower risk of cardiovascular outcomes than patients with established coronary heart disease.

What is already known on this topic

A recent influential study suggested that patients with type 2 diabetes without established cardiovascular disease have as high a risk of cardiovascular events and death as non-diabetic patients who have had a myocardial infarctionSome clinicians therefore advocate aggressive treatment of cardiovascular risk factors in the presence of diabetes

What this study adds

Patients with type 2 diabetes are at lower risk of death from all causes or cardiovascular causes and of hospital admission for myocardial infarction than patients with established coronary heart disease     

Hypertension and Diabetes—A Toxic Combination

ObjectiveTo assess the relationship of diabetes and hypertension and the effect on cardiovascular outcomes.MethodsA review of the English-language literature regarding the effects of diabetes and hypertension published between January 1, 1980, and April 30, 2008, was performed.ResultsIn type 2 diabetes, the prevalence of hypertension due to both hyperglycemia and insulin resistance is increased. High insulin levels are associated with left ventricular hypertrophy and decreased ventricular function. The growth factor effects of insulin on the myocardium are worsened by hypertension. The diabetic hypertensive patient is exquisitely sensitive to blood pressure lowering as it relates to cardiac events and mortality. Because of this, the blood pressure goals for diabetic hypertensive patients are lower than those for their nondiabetic hypertensive peers. Cardiac events have a stronger association with systolic hypertension and the pulse pressure than with diastolic hypertension. The presence of microalbuminuria not only signifies a higher risk of developing diabetic nephropathy, but also increased mortality and incidence of cardiovascular events. Thus, when microalbuminuria is detected, intensification of hypertensive therapies, especially suppression of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, is essential.ConclusionThe effects of hypertension in persons with diabetes increase the frequency and severity of cardiac events, especially when microalbuminuria is present. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:1031-1039)     

Muscle Carnosine Is Associated with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors in Humans

BackgroundCarnosine is a naturally present dipeptide abundant in skeletal muscle and an over-the counter food additive. Animal data suggest a role of carnosine supplementation in the prevention and treatment of obesity, insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease but only limited human data exists.ConclusionOur data shows that higher carnosine content in human skeletal muscle is positively associated with insulin resistance and fasting metabolic preference for glucose. Moreover, it is negatively associated with HDL-cholesterol and basal energy expenditure. Intervention studies targeting insulin resistance, metabolic and cardiovascular disease risk factors are necessary to evaluate its putative role in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.     

Concomitant Oral Antihyperglycemic Agent Use and Associated Treatment Outcomes After Initiation of Insulin Therapy

ObjectiveTo compare outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes initiating insulin lispro mix 75/25 (75% insulin lispro protamine suspension and 25% lispro) or insulin glargine therapy, stratified by baseline oral antihyperglycemic agent (OHA) use.MethodsWe performed a post hoc analysis of 6-month data from the DURABLE clinical trial, which enrolled patients with hemoglobin A_1c (A1C) levels > 7.0% treated with 2 or more OHAs (metformin, sulfonylurea, and thiazolidinedione), and randomly assigned them to treatment with twice-daily insulin lispro 75/25 or oncedaily glargine.ResultsIn both insulin treatment groups, metformin/ thiazolidinedione-treated patients had significantly greater improvement in A1C levels (-2.19% to -2.36%), lower end point A1C values, and lower rates of occurrence of hypoglycemia in comparison with metformin/sulfonylurea-treated patients (all P < .05). Patients treated with sulfonylurea/thiazolidinedione or metformin/sulfonylurea/thiazolidinedione did not differ significantly from metformin/sulfonylurea-treated patients in A1C change (-1.56% to -1.84%) or rates of occurrence of hypoglycemia.ConclusionIn these post hoc analyses, patients with type 2 diabetes initiating premixed or basal insulin therapy and treated concomitantly with the OHA combination of metformin/thiazolidinedione at baseline demonstrated significantly greater A1C improvement with less hypoglycemia in comparison with patients treated with metformin/ sulfonylurea. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:563-567)