Structure–function analysis of VEGF receptor activation and the role of coreceptors in angiogenic signaling

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) constitute a family of six polypeptides, VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D, -E and PlGF, that regulate blood and lymphatic vessel development. VEGFs specifically bind to three type V receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs), VEGFR-1, -2 and -3, and to coreceptors such as neuropilins and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (HSPG). VEGFRs are activated upon ligand-induced dimerization mediated by the extracellular domain (ECD). A study using receptor constructs carrying artificial dimerization-promoting transmembrane domains (TMDs) showed that receptor dimerization is necessary, but not sufficient, for receptor activation and demonstrates that distinct orientation of receptor monomers is required to instigate transmembrane signaling. Angiogenic signaling by VEGF receptors also depends on cooperation with specific coreceptors such as neuropilins and HSPG. A number of VEGF isoforms differ in binding to coreceptors, and ligand-specific signal output is apparently the result of the specific coreceptor complex assembled by a particular VEGF isoform. Here we discuss the structural features of VEGF family ligands and their receptors in relation to their distinct signal output and angiogenic potential.     

Additive Effects of PDGF Receptor β Signaling Pathways in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Development

The platelet-derived growth factor β receptor (PDGFRβ) is known to activate many molecules involved in signal transduction and has been a paradigm for receptor tyrosine kinase signaling for many years. We have sought to determine the role of individual signaling components downstream of this receptor in vivo by analyzing an allelic series of tyrosine–phenylalanine mutations that prevent binding of specific signal transduction components. Here we show that the incidence of vascular smooth muscle cells/pericytes (v/p), a PDGFRβ-dependent cell type, can be correlated to the amount of receptor expressed and the number of activated signal transduction pathways. A decrease in either receptor expression levels or disruption of multiple downstream signaling pathways lead to a significant reduction in v/p. Conversely, loss of RasGAP binding leads to an increase in this same cell population, implicating a potential role for this effector in attenuating the PDGFRβ signal. The combined in vivo and biochemical data suggest that the summation of pathways associated with the PDGFRβ signal transduction determines the expansion of developing v/p cells.     

VEGFR2 Trafficking,Signaling and Proteolysis is Regulated by the Ubiquitin Isopeptidase USP8

Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGF‐A) regulates many aspects of vascular function. VEGF‐A binding to vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR2) stimulates endothelial signal transduction and regulates multiple cellular responses. Activated VEGFR2 undergoes ubiquitination but the enzymes that regulate this post‐translational modification are unclear. In this study, the de‐ubiquitinating enzyme, USP8, is shown to regulate VEGFR2 trafficking, de‐ubiquitination, proteolysis and signal transduction. USP8‐depleted endothelial cells displayed altered VEGFR2 ubiquitination and production of a unique VEGFR2 extracellular domain proteolytic fragment caused by VEGFR2 accumulation in the endosome–lysosome system. In addition, perturbed VEGFR2 trafficking impaired VEGF‐A‐stimulated signal transduction in USP8‐depleted cells. Thus, regulation of VEGFR2 ubiquitination and de‐ubiquitination has important consequences for the endothelial cell response and vascular physiology.      

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family: angiogenic factors in health and disease

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are a family of secreted polypeptides with a highly conserved receptor-binding cystine-knot structure similar to that of the platelet-derived growth factors. VEGF-A, the founding member of the family, is highly conserved between animals as evolutionarily distant as fish and mammals. In vertebrates, VEGFs act through a family of cognate receptor kinases in endothelial cells to stimulate blood-vessel formation. VEGF-A has important roles in mammalian vascular development and in diseases involving abnormal growth of blood vessels; other VEGFs are also involved in the development of lymphatic vessels and disease-related angiogenesis. Invertebrate homologs of VEGFs and VEGF receptors have been identified in fly, nematode and jellyfish, where they function in developmental cell migration and neurogenesis. The existence of VEGF-like molecules and their receptors in simple invertebrates without a vascular system indicates that this family of growth factors emerged at a very early stage in the evolution of multicellular organisms to mediate primordial developmental functions.     

Snake venom vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) exhibit potent activity through their specific recognition of KDR (VEGF receptor 2)

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF165) exhibits multiple effects via the activation of two distinct endothelial receptor tyrosine kinases: Flt-1 (fms-like tyrosine kinase-1) and KDR (kinase insert domain-containing receptor). KDR shows strong ligand-dependent tyrosine phosphorylation in comparison with Flt-1 and mainly mediates the mitogenic, angiogenic, and permeability-enhancing effects of VEGF165. Here we show the isolation of two VEGFs from viper venoms and the characterization of their unique biological properties. Snake venom VEGFs strongly stimulated proliferation of vascular endothelial cells in vitro. Interestingly, the maximum activities were almost twice that of VEGF165. They also induced strong hypotension on rat arterial blood pressure compared with VEGF165 in vivo. A receptor binding assay revealed that snake venom VEGFs bound to KDR-IgG with high affinity (Kd = approximately 0.1 nm) as well as to VEGF165 but did not interact with Flt-1, Flt-4, or neuropilin-1 at all. Our data clearly indicate that snake venom VEGFs act through the specific activation of KDR and show potent effects. Snake venom VEGFs are a highly specific ligand to KDR and form a new group of the VEGF family.     

The vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) family: angiogenic factors in health and disease

Vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are a family of secreted polypeptides with a highly conserved receptor-binding cystine-knot structure similar to that of the platelet-derived growth factors. VEGF-A, the founding member of the family, is highly conserved between animals as evolutionarily distant as fish and mammals. In vertebrates, VEGFs act through a family of cognate receptor kinases in endothelial cells to stimulate blood-vessel formation. VEGF-A has important roles in mammalian vascular development and in diseases involving abnormal growth of blood vessels; other VEGFs are also involved in the development of lymphatic vessels and disease-related angiogenesis. Invertebrate homologs of VEGFs and VEGF receptors have been identified in fly, nematode and jellyfish, where they function in developmental cell migration and neurogenesis. The existence of VEGF-like molecules and their receptors in simple invertebrates without a vascular system indicates that this family of growth factors emerged at a very early stage in the evolution of multicellular organisms to mediate primordial developmental functions.     

Targeting neuropilin-1 to inhibit VEGF signaling in cancer: Comparison of therapeutic approaches

Angiogenesis (neovascularization) plays a crucial role in a variety of physiological and pathological conditions including cancer, cardiovascular disease, and wound healing. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a critical regulator of angiogenesis. Multiple VEGF receptors are expressed on endothelial cells, including signaling receptor tyrosine kinases (VEGFR1 and VEGFR2) and the nonsignaling co-receptor Neuropilin-1. Neuropilin-1 binds only the isoform of VEGF responsible for pathological angiogenesis (VEGF₁₆₅), and is thus a potential target for inhibiting VEGF signaling. Using the first molecularly detailed computational model of VEGF and its receptors, we have shown previously that the VEGFR–Neuropilin interactions explain the observed differential effects of VEGF isoforms on VEGF signaling in vitro, and demonstrated potent VEGF inhibition by an antibody to Neuropilin-1 that does not block ligand binding but blocks subsequent receptor coupling. In the present study, we extend that computational model to simulation of in vivo VEGF transport and binding, and predict the in vivo efficacy of several Neuropilin-targeted therapies in inhibiting VEGF signaling: (a) blocking Neuropilin-1 expression; (b) blocking VEGF binding to Neuropilin-1; (c) blocking Neuropilin–VEGFR coupling. The model predicts that blockade of Neuropilin–VEGFR coupling is significantly more effective than other approaches in decreasing VEGF–VEGFR2 signaling. In addition, tumor types with different receptor expression levels respond differently to each of these treatments. In designing human therapeutics, the mechanism of attacking the target plays a significant role in the outcome: of the strategies tested here, drugs with similar properties to the Neuropilin-1 antibody are predicted to be most effective. The tumor type and the microenvironment of the target tissue are also significant in determining therapeutic efficacy of each of the treatments studied.     

The function of GPI-anchored proteins in T cell development, activation and regulation of homeostasis

Many glycosylphosphatidyl-inositol-anchored proteins (GPI-AP) are expressed on T lymphocytes. Ligand or mAb-mediated aggregation of all GPI-AP tested to date results in the initiation of signal transduction pathways via the activation of src family protein tyrosine kinases. Src family kinases co-localise with GPI-AP in specialised sub-domains of the plasma membrane, referred to as detergent insoluble membrane microdomains (DIGS), which are thought to function as signalling platforms. GPI-AP may play a role in the regulation of T cell clonal expansion and effector functions at multiple levels, including the initiation of T cell activation through the antigen receptor complex, the regulation of ongoing responses supported by persisting antigen, as well as proliferative responses to the major T cell growth factor, IL-2. Evidence supporting the role of GPI-AP in the regulation of T cell development, activation and homeostasis is discussed, as well as insights provided by studies in humans and mice lacking GPI-AP.     

Induction of ligand-specific PrPC signaling in human neuronal cells

Cellular prion protein (PrP^C) has attracted considerable attention for its role in transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSEs). In spite of being a point of intense research effort critical questions still remain regarding the physiological function of PrP^C and how these functions may change with the conversion of the protein into the infectious and pathological conformation (PrP^Sc). While emerging evidence suggests PrP^C/Sc are involved in signal transduction there is little consensus on the signaling pathways associated with the normal and diseased states. The purported involvement of PrP^C in signal transduction, and the association of TSEs with neural pathology, makes kinome analysis of human neurons an interesting and appropriate model to characterize patterns of signal transduction following activation of PrP^C by two commonly employed experimental ligands; antibody-induced dimerization by 6H4 and the amino acids 106-126 PrP peptide fragment (PrP 106–126). Analysis of the induced kinome responses reveals distinct patterns of signaling activity following each treatment. Specifically, stimulation of human neurons with the 6H4 antibody results in alterations in mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways while the 106-126 peptide activates growth factor related signaling pathways including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) signaling and the phosphoinositide-3 kinase (PI3K) pathway. These pathways were validated through independent functional assays. Collectively these results indicate that stimulation of PrP^C with distinct ligands, even within the same cell type, results in unique patterns of signaling. While this investigation highlights the apparent functional versatility of PrP^C as a signaling molecule and may offer insight into cellular mechanisms of TSE pathology it also emphasizes the potential dangers associated with attributing activation of specific intracellular events to particular receptors through artificial models of receptor activation.     

Activation and Functional Analysis of Janus Kinase 2 in BA/F3 Cells Using the Coumermycin/Gyrase B System

Janus kinase 2 (Jak2) protein tyrosine kinase plays an important role in interleukin-3– or granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor–mediated signal transduction pathways leading to cell proliferation, activation of early response genes, and inhibition of apoptosis. However, it is unclear whether Jak2 can activate these signaling pathways directly without the involvement of cytokine receptor phosphorylation. To investigate the specific role of Jak2 in the regulation of signal transduction pathways, we generated gyrase B (GyrB)–Jak2 fusion proteins, dimerized through the addition of coumermycin. Coumermycin induced autophosphorylation of GyrB–Jak2 fusion proteins, thus bypassing receptor activation. Using different types of chimeric Jak2 molecules, we observed that although the kinase domain of Jak2 is sufficient for autophosphorylation, the N-terminal regions are essential for the phosphorylation of Stat5 and for the induction of short-term cell proliferation. Moreover, coumermycin-induced activation of Jak2 can also lead to increased levels of c-myc and CIS mRNAs in BA/F3 cells stably expressing the Jak2 fusion protein with the intact N-terminal region. Conversely, activation of the chimeric Jak2 induced neither phosphorylation of Shc or SHP-2 nor activation of the c-fos promoter. Here, we showed that the GyrB–Jak2 system can serve as an excellent model to dissect signals of receptor-dependent and -independent events. We also obtained evidence indicating a role for the N-terminal region of Jak2 in downstream signaling events.     

Site-Specific Phosphorylation of VEGFR2 Is Mediated by Receptor Trafficking: Insights from a Computational Model

Matrix-binding isoforms and non-matrix-binding isoforms of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) are both capable of stimulating vascular remodeling, but the resulting blood vessel networks are structurally and functionally different. Here, we develop and validate a computational model of the binding of soluble and immobilized ligands to VEGF receptor 2 (VEGFR2), the endosomal trafficking of VEGFR2, and site-specific VEGFR2 tyrosine phosphorylation to study differences in induced signaling between these VEGF isoforms. In capturing essential features of VEGFR2 signaling and trafficking, our model suggests that VEGFR2 trafficking parameters are largely consistent across multiple endothelial cell lines. Simulations demonstrate distinct localization of VEGFR2 phosphorylated on Y1175 and Y1214. This is the first model to clearly show that differences in site-specific VEGFR2 activation when stimulated with immobilized VEGF compared to soluble VEGF can be accounted for by altered trafficking of VEGFR2 without an intrinsic difference in receptor activation. The model predicts that Neuropilin-1 can induce differences in the surface-to-internal distribution of VEGFR2. Simulations also show that ligated VEGFR2 and phosphorylated VEGFR2 levels diverge over time following stimulation. Using this model, we identify multiple key levers that alter how VEGF binding to VEGFR2 results in different coordinated patterns of multiple downstream signaling pathways. Specifically, simulations predict that VEGF immobilization, interactions with Neuropilin-1, perturbations of VEGFR2 trafficking, and changes in expression or activity of phosphatases acting on VEGFR2 all affect the magnitude, duration, and relative strength of VEGFR2 phosphorylation on tyrosines 1175 and 1214, and they do so predictably within our single consistent model framework.     

Biology of vascular endothelial growth factors

Angiogenesis is the process by which new blood vessels are formed from existing vessels. The vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) are considered as key molecules in the process of angiogenesis. The VEGF family currently includes VEGF-A, -B, -C, -D, -E, -F and placenta growth factor (PlGF), that bind in a distinct pattern to three structurally related receptor tyrosine kinases, denoted VEGF receptor-1, -2, and -3. VEGF-C and VEGF-D also play a crucial role in the process of lymphangiogenesis. Here, we review the biology of VEGFs and evaluate their role in pathological angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis.     

The biflavonoid amentoflavone inhibits neovascularization preventing the activity of proangiogenic vascular endothelial growth factors

The proangiogenic members of VEGF family and related receptors play a central role in the modulation of pathological angiogenesis. Recent insights indicate that, due to the strict biochemical and functional relationship between VEGFs and related receptors, the development of a new generation of agents able to target contemporarily more than one member of VEGFs might amplify the antiangiogenic response representing an advantage in term of therapeutic outcome. To identify molecules that are able to prevent the interaction of VEGFs with related receptors, we have screened small molecule collections consisting of >100 plant extracts. Here, we report the isolation and identification from an extract of the Malian plant Chrozophora senegalensis of the biflavonoid amentoflavone as an antiangiogenic bioactive molecule. Amentoflavone can to bind VEGFs preventing the interaction and phosphorylation of VEGF receptor 1 and 2 (VEGFR-1,VEGFR-2) and to inhibit endothelial cell migration and capillary-like tube formation induced by VEGF-A or placental growth factor 1 (PlGF-1) at low μm concentration. In vivo, amentoflavone is able to inhibit VEGF-A-induced chorioallantoic membrane neovascularization as well as tumor growth and associated neovascularization, as assessed in orthotropic melanoma and xenograft colon carcinoma models. In addition structural studies performed on the amentoflavone·PlGF-1 complex have provided evidence that this biflavonoid effectively interacts with the growth factor area crucial for VEGFR-1 receptor recognition. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that amentoflavone represents an interesting new antiangiogenic molecule that is able to prevent the activity of proangiogenic VEGF family members and that the biflavonoid structure is a new chemical scaffold to develop powerful new antiangiogenic molecules.     

Vascular endothelial growth factor‐C in activating vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐3 and chemokine receptor‐4 in melanoma adhesion

Vascular endothelial growth factor‐C (VEGF‐C) binds to receptor vascular endothelial growth factor receptor‐3 (VEGFR‐3) expressed on lymphatic endothelial and melanoma cells. Binding of VEGF‐C to VEGFR‐3 enhances receptor phosphorylation that activates mitogen‐activated protein kinase (MAP‐K) and phosphatidylinositol‐3‐kinase (PI3K). These signalling pathways regulate cell migration and adhesion in response to internal or external changes.In addition, the overexpression of VEGF‐C upregulates chemokine receptor CXCR‐4 in tumours (melanoma). CXCR‐4 is expressed on cells of the immune system (natural killer cells) and facilitates the migration of leukocytes in response to the CXCL12 ligand. The latter is expressed by lymphatic endothelial cells and by stromal cells in the tumour microenvironment (TME). The gradient established between CXCR‐4 expressed on tumour cells and CXCL12 produced by stromal and lymphatic endothelial cells enhances tumour cell metastasis.3‐(4‐Dimethylamino‐naphthalen‐1‐ylmethylene)‐1, 3‐dihydroindol‐2‐one, MAZ‐51, is an indolinone‐based synthetic molecule that inhibits the phosphorylation of the tyrosine kinase receptor VEGFR‐3. CTCE‐9908, a CXCR‐4 antagonist derived from human CXCL12, hinders receptor phosphorylation and the subsequent signalling pathways that would be activated.VEGF‐C is stimulated by transforming growth factor‐beta 1 (TGF‐β1), which facilitates cell–cell and cell‐matrix adhesion by regulating cadherins through the activation of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and mediates paxillin upregulation.Increased VEGF‐C protein levels stimulated by TGF‐β bound to VEGFR‐3 impact on intracellular pathways that promote tumour cell adhesion. In addition, increased VEGF‐C protein levels lead to enhanced CXCR‐4 protein expression. Therefore, effective blocking of VEGR‐3 and CXCR‐4 may inhibit tumour cell metastasis by hampering intracellular proteins promoting adhesion.     

Signal transduction by VEGF receptors in regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis

The VEGF/VPF (vascular endothelial growth factor/vascular permeability factor) ligands and receptors are crucial regulators of vasculogenesis, angiogenesis, lymphangiogenesis and vascular permeability in vertebrates. VEGF-A, the prototype VEGF ligand, binds and activates two tyrosine kinase receptors: VEGFR1 (Flt-1) and VEGFR2 (KDR/Flk-1). VEGFR1, which occurs in transmembrane and soluble forms, negatively regulates vasculogenesis and angiogenesis during early embryogenesis, but it also acts as a positive regulator of angiogenesis and inflammatory responses, playing a role in several human diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and cancer. The soluble VEGFR1 is overexpressed in placenta in preeclampsia patients. VEGFR2 has critical functions in physiological and pathological angiogenesis through distinct signal transduction pathways regulating proliferation and migration of endothelial cells. VEGFR3, a receptor for the lymphatic growth factors VEGF-C and VEGF-D, but not for VEGF-A, regulates vascular and lymphatic endothelial cell function during embryogenesis. Loss-of-function variants of VEGFR3 have been identified in lymphedema. Formation of tumor lymphatics may be stimulated by tumor-produced VEGF-C, allowing increased spread of tumor metastases through the lymphatics. Mapping the signaling system of these important receptors may provide the knowledge necessary to suppress specific signaling pathways in major human diseases.