Ethnic disparity in hemoglobin A1c levels among normoglycemic offspring of parents with type 2 diabetes mellitus

ObjectiveTo investigate the racial/ethnic disparities in hemoglobin A_1c levels among nondiabetic persons with similar parental history of type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsWe studied a community-based sample of adult offspring of parents with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Measurements included anthropometry, hematology assessments, serial fasting plasma glucose, oral glucose tolerance testing, plasma insulin, hemoglobin A_1c, insulin sensitivity, and b-cell function, using a homeostasis model assessment.ResultsThe study included 302 participants (135 white, 167 black). Compared with white participants, black participants had lower fasting plasma glucose levels (91.9 ± 0.51 mg/dL vs 93.6 ± 0.50 mg/dL, P = .015), lower area under the curve of plasma glucose during oral glucose tolerance testing (P = <.001), higher body mass index (31.1 ± 0.61 kg/m² vs 28.5 ± 0.57 kg/m², P = <.001), and similar insulin sensitivity and b-cell function. Hemoglobin A_1c was higher in black participants than in white participants (5.68 ± 0.033% vs 5.45 ± 0.028%, P <.001). The absolute black-white difference in hemoglobin A_1c level of approximately 0.22% persisted after adjusting for age, hemoglobin, hematocrit, body mass index, waist circumference, fasting plasma glucose, glucose area under the curve, and other covariates.ConclusionsAmong healthy offspring of parents with type 2 diabetes mellitus in this study, African American participants had higher hemoglobin A_1c levels than white participants after adjusting for age, adiposity, blood glucose, and known variables. Thus, plasma glucose level is more valid than hemoglobin A_1c for diagnosing prediabetes or diabetes in black persons. (Endocr Pract. 2012; 18:356-362)     

Sitagliptin in Glutamic Acid Decarboxylase Antibody-Positive Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo describe a case illustrating the use of sitagliptin, an inhibitor of dipeptidyl-peptidase-4 (DPP-4), in anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody-positive diabetes mellitus in association with a rare ataxic variant of stiff person syndrome.MethodsWe present our experience with use of the DPP-4 inhibitor sitagliptin for management of autoimmune diabetes in a elderly woman and highlight the association of diabetes with other autoimmune conditions.ResultsA 68-year-old Japanese woman presented with poorly controlled “type 2” diabetes mellitus, cerebral palsy, cerebellar ataxia, and hypothyroidism. She complained of stiffness and spasms, which had resulted in multiple falls and immobility. Antidiabetic medications included gliclazide, rosiglitazone, and acarbose; various insulins had been tried but discontinued because they worsened her stiffness and spasms. Her hemoglobin A_1c values remained above 9% despite maximal doses of the aforementioned orally administered hypoglycemic agents. After sitagliptin therapy was initiated, her hemoglobin A_1c level decreased from 9.3% (78 mmol/mol) to 7.3% (56 mmol/mol) in 5 months. Investigations confirmed the presence of an ataxic variant of stiff person syndrome. On repeated testing 18 months later, her anti-glutamic acid decarboxylase antibody levels had declined by more than 85%.ConclusionApart from the well-known mechanism of an increase in glucagonlike peptide-1, sitagliptin may exert its glucose-lowering effect by other mechanisms in patients with autoimmune diabetes. Further studies should be undertaken to address the effectiveness of DPP-4 inhibitors in non-type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18: e65-e68)     

Preadmission Glycemic Control and Changes to Diabetes Mellitus Treatment Regimen After Hospitalization

ObjectiveTo evaluate treatment patterns associated with diabetes medication regimen changes after hospitalization on the basis on preadmission hemoglobin A_1c levels.MethodsIn this retrospective database analysis, patients with a diabetes diagnosis, hospitalization, and documented hemoglobin A_1c level within the 90 days leading up to hospital admission were identified in an administrative claims database. Treatment regimens were assessed before and after hospitalization. The proportion of patients who had progression, reduction, or no change in therapy was compared across hemoglobin A_1c subgroups: hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0%, hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9%, and hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0%.ResultsFour hundred patients were included (192 in hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% group, 94 in hemoglobin A_1c 7.0% 7.9% group, and 114 in hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% group). Demographically, hemoglobin A_1c subgroups did not differ significantly (mean age, 57 years; 47.5% male). With respect to therapeutic regimen overall, 28%, 24%, and 48% of patients experienced progression, reduction, and no change, respectively. Across hemoglobin A_1c subgroups, 37.7% of patients in the hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% subgroup had therapy progression compared with 26% and 20.2% in the hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% and hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9% subgroups, respectively (P = .032 and P = .006, respectively). Within the progression category, progression via insulin initiation was significantly higher in the hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% subgroup (55.8%) than in the hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% subgroup (16%, P < .001), but not significantly higher than in the hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9% subgroup (36.8%, P = .084). In the hemoglobin A_1c ≥ 8.0% subgroup, a lower percentage of patients, 35.1%, experienced no therapy change than in both the hemoglobin A_1c < 7.0% subgroup (52.6%) and the hemoglobin A_1c 7.0%-7.9% subgroup (54.3%) (P = .003 and P = .006, respectively). There was no difference between subgroups in reduction of therapy.ConclusionsA higher proportion of patients with a hemoglobin A_1c level ≥ 8.0% had progression of their antidiabetes therapy after hospitalization and fewer patients had no change in therapy than those in lower hemoglobin A_1c subgroups. These data suggest that clinicians may be using hemoglobin A_1c measurements to guide discharge planning treatment decisions. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:371-375)     

Comparison of 2 Intensification Regimens with Rapid-Acting Insulin Aspart in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by Once-Daily Insulin Detemir and Oral Antidiabetes Drugs: The Step-Wise Randomized Study

ObjectiveTo compare the efficacy and safety of 2 intensification strategies for stepwise addition of prandial insulin aspart in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin detemir.MethodsThis randomized, controlled, parallel-group, open-label, 48-week trial compared the stepwise addition of insulin aspart to either the largest meal (titration based on premeal glucose values [SimpleSTEP]) or to the meal with the largest prandial glucose increment (titration based on postmeal glucose values [ExtraSTEP]) in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on basal insulin and oral antidiabetes drugs. After 12 weeks of basal insulin detemir dosage optimization, participants with a hemoglobin A₁ level of 7% or greater entered three 12-week treatment periods with stepwise addition of a first insulin aspart bolus, then a second, and then a third, if hemoglobin A_1c remained at 7% or greater after 12 and 24 weeks of treatment, respectively. Endpoints included hemoglobin A_1c (primary endpoint), fasting plasma glucose, self-measured plasma glucose, adverse events, and hypoglycemia.ResultsTwo hundred ninety-six patients were randomly assigned to treatment with insulin aspart in the SimpleSTEP (n = 150) and ExtraSTEP (n = 146) groups. Hemoglobin A_1c decreased by approximately 1.2% in both groups, to 7.5 ± 1.1% (SimpleSTEP) and 7.7 ± 1.2% (ExtraSTEP) at end of trial (estimated treatment difference, SimpleSTEP ExtraSTEP: -0.06% [95% confidence interval, -0.29 to 0.17]). Self-measured plasma glucose levels decreased with both regimens. At trial end, approximately 75% of patients in each group were using 3 prandial injections. The frequency of adverse events and hypoglycemia was low and similar between groups.ConclusionThe SimpleSTEP and ExtraSTEP strategies for stepwise addition of insulin aspart to 1 or more meals were equally effective at intensifying therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes not achieving glycemic control on basal insulin and oral antidiabetic drugs. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:727-736)     

Clinical Use of Liraglutide in Type 2 Diabetes and its Effects on Cardiovascular Risk Factors

ObjectiveTo assess whether liraglutide, a glucagonlike peptide-1 receptor agonist, has cardioprotective properties in addition to its glycemic effects.MethodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of medical records of 110 obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with liraglutide for at least 6 months between March 2010 and April 2011 at our tertiary care referral center. The variables analyzed were body mass index, hemoglobin A_1c (A1C), systolic blood pressure (SBP), plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) concentrations, and serum lipids.ResultsIn our overall study cohort, we noted a reduction in mean weight from 120 ± 5 kg to 115 ± 3 kg and a decrease in mean A1C from 7.8% ± 0.6% to 7.2% ± 0.2%. The mean triglyceride concentration decreased from 173 ± 19 mg/dL to 151 ± 15 mg/dL, the mean SBP was reduced from 132 ± 6 mm Hg to 125 ± 4 mm Hg, and the mean CRP concentration declined from 4.7 ± 0.8 mg/L to 3.2 ± 0.4 mg/L after treatment with liraglutide for a minimal duration of 6 months and a mean duration of 7.5 months (for all the foregoing changes, P < .05).These variables decreased whether these patients were previously treated with orally administered hypoglycemic agents alone or in combination with insulin or exenatide.ConclusionOur findings in a clinical practice show that liraglutide is a potent antidiabetes drug, whether given in combination with orally administered agents or insulin or as a substitution for exenatide. It lowers body weight, A1C levels, SBP, and CRP and triglyceride concentrations. (Endocr Pract. 2012;18:140-145)     

Benefits of Continuous Glucose Monitor Use in Clinical Practice

ObjectiveTo determine the benefits of personal con- tinuous glucose monitoring (CGM) outside of a controlled clinical trial in a single ambulatory diabetes clinic.MethodsIn this retrospective study, we reviewed medical records of all patients who began CGM in our university-based clinical practice between July 2006 and October 2008. Data pertaining to 1 year before initiation of CGM through January 2009 were collected. All patient visits were performed by any 1 of 7 board-certified endo- crinologists and/or 5 certified diabetes educators. A severe hypoglycemic event was considered to have occurred if the patient reported requiring assistance or losing conscious- ness, or if there was documentation from another source (eg, an emergency department visit). Analysis of the effect of CGM on hemoglobin A_1c and occurrence of severe hypoglycemia was performed.ResultsA total of 117 patients initiated CGM between July 2006 and October 2008 and used CGM for at least 2 months (total experience on CGM, 1136 patient-months; average 9.7 months per patient). Mean age was 44.5 ± 12.8 years (range, 14.3-71.7 years), and average duration of dia- betes mellitus was 23.9 years. All patients were using insu- lin pumps before initiation of CGM, including 10 patients with type 2 diabetes. Sixty-eight patients (58%) had pre- existing hypoglycemia unawareness. Average hemoglobin A_1c level for 1 year before CGM initiation was 7.6 ± 1.1%, and with CGM use it dropped to 7.2 ± 0.8% (P <.001). Forty-two patients had severe hypoglycemic events in the year before CGM use or during CGM use. Overall, CGM use was associated with a significant decrease in the rate of severe hypoglycemic episodes (odds ratio, 0.40; 95% confidence interval, 0.24-0.65).ConclusionsPersonal CGM, in a real-world setting, improves glucose control and reduces the rate of severe hypoglycemic episodes. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:371-375)     

Computerized Physician Order Entry- Based Hyperglycemia Inpatient Protocol and Glycemic Outcomes: The CPOE-HIP Study

ObjectiveTo evaluate the impact of implementing a computerized physician order entry (CPOE)-based hyperglycemia inpatient protocol (HIP) on glycemic outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective, cross-sectional study compared blood glucose values, hemoglobin A_1c values, diabetes medication profiles, and demographic data of diabetic patients admitted to medicine services between March 15, 2006, and April 11, 2006 (before CPOE-HIP protocol was adopted), with data of diabetic patients admitted between October 3, 2007, and October 30, 2007 (1 year after CPOE-HIP protocol was implemented).ResultsA total of 241 diabetic patients comprised the pre-CPOE-HIP group and 197 patients comprised the post-CPOE-HIP group. After the protocol was adopted, there was a decrease of 10.8 mg/dL in the mean glucose concentration per patient-day (175.5 ± 81.2 mg/dL vs 164.7 ± 82 mg/dL, P < .001). Additional glycemic control improvements included a 5% increase in patient-days with serum glucose concentrations between 70 and 150 mg/ dL (41.1% vs 46.1%, P = .008) and a 3.1% decrease in patient-days with glucose concentrations above 299 mg/dL (16.9% vs 13.8%, P = .023). The percentage of patientdays with glucose concentrations less than or equal to 50 mg/dL was not significantly different (0.95% vs 1.27%, P = .15). Compliance with the American Diabetes Association recommendation for hemoglobin A_1c inpatient testing frequency increased from 37.3% to 64.5% (P < .001). The length of stay did not differ between the groups.ConclusionsImplementation of a hospital-wide, CPOE-based, hyperglycemia management protocol had a favorable impact onglucose targets, decreasing excessively high glucose levels without increasing clinically meaningful hypoglycemic events. Compliance with hemoglobin A_1c testing recommendations also improved. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:389-397)     

Diurnal Glucose Patterns of Exenatide Once Weekly: A 1-Year Study Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring with Ambulatory Glucose Profile Analysis

ObjectiveTo use continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) to characterize diurnal glucose patterns produced by a novel formulation of exenatide consisting of biodegradable polymeric microspheres that entrap exenatide and provide extended release enabling once-weekly administration.MethodsWe performed a subgroup analysis of patients with type 2 diabetes who participated in a multicenter trial (DURATION-1: Effects of Exenatide Long- Acting Release on Glucose Control and Safety in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus) comparing once-weekly with twice-daily formulations of exenatide. We are the only center to use CGM with ambulatory glucose profile (AGP) analysis to characterize glucose exposure, variability, and stability in participants assigned to exenatide once weekly.ResultsSeven of the 303 patients in the larger study population were included in the subgroup analysis. Mean age (57.6 ± 7 years), weight (102 ± 17 kg), body mass index (34 ± 3 kg/m²), and duration of diabetes (5 ± 2 years) were comparable to characteristics of the larger study population. At 30 weeks and 52 weeks, participants treated with exenatide once weekly had a mean reduction in hemoglobin A_1c level of 1.3 ± 0.3% and 1.0 ± 0.3%, respectively (P < .05). CGM analysis revealed a significant (P < .01) decrease in diurnal glucose exposure for 4 participants during nocturnal and daytime periods. Excess glucose exposure (compared with reference values) decreased in 6 of 7 participants, as did glucose variability. Glucose stability improved in 5 participants. The percentage of glucose values less than 70 mg/dL initially increased during the first half of the study then decreased to baseline levels by study end.ConclusionsIndividual glucose profiles revealed that changes in hemoglobin A_1c did not consistently parallel alterations in glucose exposure, variability, and stability. AGPs provided a visual representation of improved glucose responses to exenatide once weekly. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:326-334)     

Assessment of AACE/ACE Recommendations for Initial Dual Antihyperglycemic Therapy Using the Fixed-Dose Combination of Sitagliptin and Metformin Versus Metformin

ObjectiveThe American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists and American College of Endocrinology (AACE/ACE) diabetes algorithm recommends a stratified approach to initial therapy to achieve a glycated hemoglobin (HbA_1c) goal of <6.5% in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who have inadequate glycemic control. Data from a double-blind study in drug-naïve T2DM patients comparing initial monotherapy with metformin (MET) with initial dual therapy with a fixed-dose combination of sitagliptin and MET (SITA/MET FDC) was used to determine AACE/ACE HbA_1c goal attainment in these treatment groups.MethodsA total of 1,250 patients (mean baseline HbA_1c = 9.9%) were randomized 1:1 to SITA/MET FDC 50/500 mg twice daily (b.i.d.) or MET 500 mg b.i.d. for 18 weeks. SITA/MET FDC and MET were uptitrated over 4 weeks to 50/1,000 mg b.i.d. and 1,000 mg b.i.d., respectively.ResultsAt week 18, a higher percentage of patients receiving SITA/MET FDC had HbA_1c levels <6.5% and <7% than those receiving MET alone within each of the 3 AACE/ACE HbA_1c categories (6.5-7.5%, >7.5-9.0%, and >9.0%). Of patients with a baseline HbA_1c >7.5-9.0% who initiated SITA/MET FDC, 48.6% achieved an HbA_1c <6.5% at week 18 compared with 23.1% of patients who initiated MET monotherapy (P<.001). In patients with a baseline HbA >9.0%, 24.0% on SITA/MET FDC achieved an HbA_1c <6.5% compared with 12.8% on MET alone (P<.001).ConclusionIn T2DM patients with a baseline HbA_1c >7.5-9.0%, substantially more achieved the HbA_1c goal of <6.5% with initial dual therapy (SITA/MET FDC) than with initial monotherapy (MET), which is in agreement with the AACE/ACE diabetes algorithm.(Endocr Pract. 2013;19:751-757)     

Clinical effects of long-term metreleptin treatment in patients with lipodystrophy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term clinical effect of treatment with metreleptin (an analogue of human leptin) on glycemic and lipid abnormalities and markers of hepatic steatosis in patients with inherited or acquired lipodystrophy.MethodsFifty-five patients (36 with generalized lipodystrophy and 19 with partial lipodystrophy) with at least 1 of 3 metabolic abnormalities (diabetes mellitus, fasting triglyceride level ≥ 200 mg/dL, and insulin resistance) and low leptin levels received subcutaneous injections of metreleptin once or twice daily in an ongoing clinical trial at the National Institutes of Health.ResultsAt baseline, hemoglobin A_1c-8.5% ± 2.1% (mean ± standard deviation [SD])-and triglycerides—479 ± 80 mg/dL (geometric mean ± standard error [SE])-were substantially elevated. Robust and sustained reductions in both variables were evident for the observed patient population during a 3-year metreleptin treatment period (-2.1% ± 0.5% [mean ± SE] and -35.4% ± 13.7% [mean ± SE], respectively). Mean alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) levels were elevated at baseline (100 ± 120 U/L and 71 ± 77 U/L [mean ± SD], respectively) and decreased by -45 ± 19 U/L and -33 ± 14 U/L (mean ± SE), respectively, during the 3-year metreleptin treatment period. Improvements in hemoglobin A_1c, triglycerides, ALT, and AST were more pronounced in the subsets of patients having elevated levels at baseline. The most notable adverse events observed in this patient population were likely attributable to underlying metabolic abnormalities or comorbidities.ConclusionMetreleptin treatment substantially reduced glycemic variables, triglycerides, and liver enzymes (ALT and AST) and demonstrated durability of response throughout a 3-year treatment period. These results support metreleptin as a potential treatment for certain metabolic disorders (for example, diabetes mellitus and hypertriglyceridemia) associated with lipodystrophy. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:922-932)     

Effect of Glargine Insulin Delivery Method (Pen Device Versus Vial/Syringe) on Glycemic Control and Patient Preferences in Patients with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effects of two different glargine insulin delivery methods (pen device vs. vial/ syringe) on glycemic control and patient preferences in a randomized, open-label, crossover, comparative effectiveness study.MethodsThirty-one patients discharged from the hospital were recruited for this study. In the hospital, all patients were treated with a basal-bolus insulin regimen. Upon discharge, 21 patients received glargine by pen device for 3 months and were then switched to vial/syringe for the next 3 months (group 1). Group 2 consisted of 10 patients discharged on vial/syringe and converted to pen device after 3 months. Hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c) was measured at enrollment and at 3 and 6 months. A questionnaire assessing patient preference was administered at 3 and 6 months.ResultsGroups 1 and 2 had similar baseline HbA_1c (10.7 ± 2.2% and 11.2 ± 2.5%, respectively) and similar reduction in HbA_1c at 3 months (7.8 ± 1.7% and 7.3 ± 1.4%, respectively; P < .001 vs. baseline). However, after crossover, the changes in HbA_1c from 3 to 6 months were significantly different between groups. HbA_1c increased to 8.5 ± 2.0% at 6 months in group 1 after switching to the vial/syringe but remained unchanged (7.1 ± 1.6%) in group 2 after switching to a pen device (P < .01, group 1 vs. group 2). Patient questionnaires after each phase of the trial revealed that patients found the pen device more convenient and were more likely to recommend this insulin delivery method to someone else.ConclusionPatients switching to a glargine pen device achieved lower HbA_1c at the 6-month follow-up. Patients in both groups overwhelmingly preferred glargine pens over vials/syringes. (Endocr Pract. 2014;20:536-539)     

Markedly Low Hemoglobin A1c in a Patient with an Unusual Presentation of ß-Thalassemia Minor

ObjectiveTo describe very low hemoglobin A_1c levels in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus and an unusual presentation of β-thalassemia minor.MethodsWe present the clinical and laboratory findings of the study patient.ResultsA 64-year-old African American man with type 2 diabetes mellitus was referred to the endocrinology clinic with a hemoglobin A_1c level of 1.6% despite elevated blood glucose concentrations. A red blood cell survival study with chromium-51 revealed that he had a reduced erythrocyte life span less than 25% of normal. He also had a markedly elevated reticulocyte count ranging from 236 to 534 x 10³/μL (reference range, 25-75 x 103/μL). The laboratory findings, which are not characteristic of ß-thalassemia minor, could be the cause of the markedly low hemoglobin A_1c in this patient.ConclusionsAlthough rare, when associated with marked erythrocyte turnover, β-thalassemia minor can lead to a severe reduction in HbA_1c levels. In this scenario, glycemic control is best assessed by measuring fructosamine. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:89-92)     

Effectiveness and Long-Term Safety of Thiazolidinediones and Metformin in Renal Transplant Recipients

ObjectiveTo investigate the long-term safety and effectiveness of thiazolidinediones and metformin in renal transplant recipients with posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) or preexisting diabetes mellitus (DM).MethodsRetrospective chart review was performed for renal transplant recipients with PTDM or preexisting DM followed up during the years 2000-2006. Data collected included baseline characteristics; glomerular filtration rate (GFR); creatinine; hemoglobin A_1c; and development of congestive heart failure, edema, and liver function abnormalities. GFR was calculated using the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease study equation calculator.ResultsThirty-two patients comprised the metformin group (PTDM = 21, preexisting DM = 11), and 46 patients were included in the TZD group (PTDM = 33, preexisting DM = 13). Only 24 patients taking metformin and 31 patients taking TZDs were included for effectiveness analysis since the others required additional medications to control their DM. Mean follow-up was 16.4 months (range, 1-55 months) for patients treated with metformin and 37.1 months (range, 6-72 months) for patients treated with TZDs. GFR was decreased from baseline in all patients, but the only significant change was in patients with preexisting DM. While there was a significant change in creatinine levels in the metformin group, only 5 patients had to discontinue the drug because of this elevation (3 in preexisting DM group, 2 in PTDM group). Change in hemoglobin A_1c from baseline was not significant in either study group. Development of congestive heart failure or liver function abnormalities was not observed.ConclusionsMetformin appears to be safe in the renal transplant population for a mean duration of 16 months, although caution should be exercised using close monitoring in patients with preexisting DM. TZDs appear to be safe for a mean duration of 37 months after renal transplant. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:979-984)     

Effects of Colesevelam,Rosiglitazone, or Sitagliptin on Glycemic Control and Lipid Profile in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled by Metformin Monotherapy

ObjectiveTo evaluate the glycemic effect of colesevelam, rosiglitazone, or sitagliptin when added to metformin monotherapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) and to examine the effects of these antidiabetes agents on lipid and lipoprotein levels.MethodsThis 16-week, open-label pilot study conducted between May 2007 and April 2008 at 20 sites in the United States, 7 sites in Mexico, and 6 sites in Colombia, enrolled adults with inadequately controlled type 2 DM (glycated hemoglobin [HbA_1c], 7.0%-10.0%) on a stable metformin regimen (1500-2550 mg daily for ≥ 3 months). At Week 0, participants were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to open-label colesevelam hydrochloride, 3.75 g daily; openlabel rosiglitazone maleate, 4 mg daily; or open-label sitagliptin phosphate, 100 mg daily, in addition to existing metformin therapy. The primary efficacy variable was the change in HbA_1c from baseline to Week 16 with last (postbaseline) observation carried forward.ResultsIn total, 169 participants were randomly assigned to treatment groups (colesevelam, n = 57; rosiglitazone, n = 56; and sitagliptin, n = 56), and 141 participants (83.4%) completed the study. Least-squares mean reductions in HbA_1c from baseline were observed in all groups at Week 16 last observation carried forward (colesevelam, -0.3% [P <.031]; rosiglitazone: -0.6% [P <.001]; sitagliptin: -0.4% [P <.009]) At study end, 10 of 56 participants (17.9%) in the colesevelam group, 19 of 54 (35.2%) in the rosiglitazone group, and 15 of 55 (27.3%) in the sitagliptin group achieved HbA_1c < 7.0%. Colesevelam significantly reduced mean low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol levels relative to baseline (11.6%), whereas levels were significantly increased with rosiglitazone and sitagliptin at Week 16 last observation carried forward (7.8% and 7.7%, respectively). Twenty-two of 52 participants (42.3%) in the colesevelam group, 12 of 51 (23.5%) in the rosiglitazone group, and 13 of 53 (24.5%) in the sitagliptin group achieved LDL cholesterol < 100 mg/dL at Week 16 last observation carried forward.ConclusionAll 3 antidiabetes agents significantly improved glycemic control, but only colesevelam also significantly reduced LDL-cholesterol levels in patients with type 2 DM. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:53-63)     

Exenatide Therapy in Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated with Insulin

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of exenatide on clinical parameters in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose hyperglycemia is not adequately controlled despite treatment with oral hypoglycemic agents and insulin.MethodsIn this retrospective analysis, clinical progress of 52 obese patients with type 2 diabetes treated with exenatide, 5 mcg twice daily, in an outpatient setting was reviewed. Treatment initiation was between September and December 2005. Mean follow-up period was 26 weeks. Thirty-eight patients took exenatide regularly (Group A); 14 patients discontinued exenatide because of insurance, personal, or economic reasons (Group B). Measurements at baseline and at follow-up included body weight; blood pressure; and levels of hemoglobin A_1c (HbA_1c), high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP), and plasma lipids. Insulin dosage requirements were assessed.ResultsMean body weight (± standard error of the mean) decreased by 6.46 ± 0.8 kg (P < .001) in Group A and increased by 2.4 ± 0.6 kg in Group B (P < .001). In Group A, mean HbA_1c decreased by 0.6 ± 0.21% (P = .007), and the insulin dosage requirement decreased for rapid-acting and mixed insulins (P < .02). In Group A, means of the following parameters decreased: serum total cholesterol by 8.5 ± 3.3% (P = .03), triglycerides by 26 ± 7.6% (P = .01), systolic blood pressure by 9.2 ± 3.3 mm Hg (P = .02), and high-sensitivity CRP by 34 ± 14.3% (P = .05). These indices did not change in Group B.ConclusionExenatide effectively treats obese patients with type 2 diabetes on insulin, leading to weight loss and reduction in levels of HbA_lc, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, and high-sensitivity CRP. (Endocr Pract 2007;13:444-450)     

Impact of Race/Ethnicity on the Efficacy and Safety of Commonly used Insulin Regimens: A Post HOC Analysis of Clinical Trials in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo explore the impact of race/ethnicity on the efficacy and safety of commonly used insulin regimens in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsIn this post hoc analysis, pooled data from 11 multinational clinical trials involving 1455 patients with type 2 diabetes were used to compare specific insulin treatments in Latino/Hispanic, Asian, African-descent, and Caucasian patients. Insulin treatments included once daily insulin glargine or neutral protamine Hagedorn (BASAL), insulin lispro mix 75/25 twice daily (LMBID), or insulin lispro mix 50/50 three times daily (LMTID).ResultsRace/ethnicity was associated with significant outcome differences for each of the insulin regimens. BASAL therapy was associated with greater improvement in several measures of glycemic control among Latino/Hispanic patients compared with Caucasian patients (lower end point hemoglobin A1c, greater reduction in hemoglobin A1c from baseline, and a larger proportion of patients achieving hemoglobin A1c level < 7%). In contrast, LMBID therapy was associated with higher end point hemoglobin A_1c and a smaller decrease in hemoglobin A_1c from baseline in Latino/Hispanic and Asian patients than in Caucasian patients. Furthermore, fewer Asian patients attained a hemoglobin A_1c level < 7% than did Caucasians patients. For LMTID therapy, hemoglobin A_1c outcomes were comparable across patient groups. Fasting blood glucose and glycemic excursions varied among racial/ethnic groups for the 3 insulin regimens. Weight change was comparable among racial/ethnic groups in each insulin regimen. During treatment with LMTID, Asian patients experienced higher incidence and rate of severe hypoglycemia than Caucasian patients.ConclusionsLatino/Hispanic, Asian, and African-descent patients with type 2 diabetes show different metabolic responses to insulin therapy, dependent in part on insulin type and regimen intensity. (Endocr Pract. 2010: 818-828:pp)     

The Efficacy and Safety of Co-Administration of Sitagliptin With Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes at Hospital Discharge

Objective: Few randomized controlled trials have focused on the optimal management of patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) during the transition from the inpatient to outpatient setting. This multicenter open-label study explored a discharge strategy based on admission hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) to guide therapy in general medicine and surgery patients with T2D.Methods: Patients with HbA1c ≤7% (53 mmol/mol) were discharged on sitagliptin and metformin; patients with HbA1c between 7 and 9% (53–75 mmol/mol) and those >9% (75 mmol/mol) were discharged on sitagliptinmetformin with glargine U-100 at 50% or 80% of the hospital daily dose. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c at 3 and 6 months after discharge.Results: Mean HbA1c on admission for the entire cohort (N = 253) was 8.70 ± 2.3% and decreased to 7.30 ± 1.5% and 7.30 ± 1.7% at 3 and 6 months (P<.001). Patients with HbA1c <7% went from 6.3 ± 0.5% to 6.3 ± 0.80% and 6.2 ± 1.0% at 3 and 6 months. Patients with HbA1c between 7 and 9% had a reduction from 8.0 ± 0.6% to 7.3 ± 1.1% and 7.3 ± 1.3%, and those with HbA1c >9% from 11.3 ± 1.7% to 8.0 ± 1.8% and 8.0 ± 2.0% at 3 and 6 months after discharge (both P<.001). Clinically significant hypoglycemia (<54 mg/dL) was observed in 4%, 4%, and 7% among patients with a HbA1c <7%, 7 to 9%, and >9%, while a glucose <40 mg/dL was reported in <1% in all groups.Conclusion: The proposed HbA1c-based hospital discharge algorithm using a combination of sitagliptin-metformin was safe and significantly improved glycemic control after hospital discharge in general medicine and surgery patients with T2D.Abbreviations: BG = blood glucose; DPP-4 = dipeptidyl peptidase-4; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c = hemoglobin A1c; T2D = type 2 diabetes     

Effectiveness of a Spanish Language Clinic for Hispanic Youth with Type 1 Diabetes

ObjectiveA pilot study was undertaken to determine whether establishment of a Spanish Language Diabetes Clinic (SLDC) for Spanish-speaking families conducted by a team of Spanish-speaking, Hispanic and nonHispanic clinicians provides a means to improve control of type 1 diabetes (T1D).MethodsThe first 21 Hispanic pediatric patients with T1D who enrolled in the SLDC were matched to 21 Hispanic patients treated in the English Language Diabetes Clinic (ELDC) based on age and duration of diabetes. The two groups did not differ significantly with respect to gender, body mass index (BMI), or glycated hemoglobin (HbAlc). Patients in both groups were followed for 12 months.ResultsThe mean (± standard deviation) baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level in the SLDC group (8.4 ± 1.0%) was similar to that in the ELDC group (8.6 ± 1.4%, P = .83). HbA1c levels fell by 0.5 ± 1.0% (P = .01) during the year following enrollment in the SLDC but did not change significantly from baseline during the year of follow-up in the ELDC group (decrease of 0.2 ± 0.9%, P = .1). At the start of the study, only 5 patients (23%) in the SLDC group and 7 patients (33%) in the ELDC group met the ≤7.5% target HbAlc level. After 1 year, 10 of the SLDC patients (48%) and 4 of ELDC patients (19%) had HbAlc levels ≤7.5% (P = .01).ConclusionOur preliminary findings support the hypothesis that overcoming language barriers by the establishment of a SLDC can be an effective means of improving metabolic control in youth with T1D in Hispanic families with limited English language skills. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:800-804)