Targeting duplex DNA with DNA‐PNA chimeras? Physico‐chemical characterization of a triplex DNA‐PNA/DNA/DNA

Targeting double-stranded DNA with homopyrimidine PNAs results in strand displacement complexes PNA/DNA/PNA rather than PNA/DNA/DNA triplex structures. Not much is known about the binding properties of DNA-PNA chimeras. A 16-mer 5'-DNA-3'-p-(N)PNA(C) has been investigated for its ability to hybridize a complementary duplex DNA by DSC, CD, and molecular modeling studies. The obtained results showed the formation of a triplex structure having similar, if not slightly higher, stability compared to the same all-DNA complex.     

DNA序列的“双符三阶”图形编码

DNA的图形编码是在几何意义下,在不同位置,用不同的标记符号及不同的方向线段,对DNA的序列进行编码．DNA图形编码相对于DNA的字符编码而言,具有直观、简明、形象和便于比较局部DNA序列的相似性等特点。在分析已知各类：DNA的图形表示模式的基础上,提出一种DNA序列的“双符三阶”图形编码,并以此对一些特异DNA编码序列进行分析。DNA图形编码与DNA字符编码呈一一对应关系,具有简便易行、编译方便、形象丰富、便于比较等优点。适用于DNA短序列的相似性检测与分析,在生物信息学上有一定的应用前景。     

A DNA Polymerase-����Primase Cofactor with Homology to Replication Protein A-32 Regulates DNA Replication in Mammalian Cells

α-Accessory factor (AAF) stimulates the activity of DNA polymerase-α·primase, the only enzyme known to initiate DNA replication in eukaryotic cells (Goulian, M., Heard, C. J., and Grimm, S. L. (1990) J. Biol. Chem. 265 ,13221 -13230). We purified the AAF heterodimer composed of 44- and 132-kDa subunits from cultured cells and identified full-length cDNA clones using amino acid sequences from internal peptides. AAF-132 demonstrated no homologies to known proteins; AAF-44, however, is evolutionarily related to the 32-kDa subunit of replication protein A (RPA-32) and contains an oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide-binding (OB) fold domain similar to the OB fold domains of RPA involved in single-stranded DNA binding. Epitope-tagged versions of AAF-44 and -132 formed a complex in intact cells, and purified recombinant AAF-44 bound to single-stranded DNA and stimulated DNA primase activity only in the presence of AAF-132. Mutations in conserved residues within the OB fold of AAF-44 reduced DNA binding activity of the AAF-44·AAF-132 complex. Immunofluorescence staining of AAF-44 and AAF-132 in S phase-enriched HeLa cells demonstrated punctate nuclear staining, and AAF co-localized with proliferating cell nuclear antigen, a marker for replication foci containing DNA polymerase-α·primase and RPA. Small interfering RNA-mediated depletion of AAF-44 in tumor cell lines inhibited [methyl-³H]thymidine uptake into DNA but did not affect cell viability. We conclude that AAF shares structural and functional similarities with RPA-32 and regulates DNA replication, consistent with its ability to increase polymerase-α·primase template affinity and stimulate both DNA primase and polymerase-α activities in vitro.In eukaryotic cells, DNA replication is initiated at multiple origins internal to each chromosome; the origin recognition complex recruits cell division cycle and minichromosome maintenance proteins to form a preinitiation complex (1). At the G₁-S phase transition, the latter complex is activated by cyclin-dependent protein kinases leading to formation of an initiation complex that alters local DNA structure through DNA helicase activity (1, 2). The replication protein A (RPA)² is recruited to bind and stabilize single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) produced by the initiation complex (3, 4). RPA serves as an auxiliary factor for DNA polymerase-α (pol-α)·primase: it stabilizes the protein complex by direct interaction with both pol-α and primase subunits, and it reduces the misincorporation rate of pol-α, acting as a “fidelity clamp” (5, 6). The pol-α·primase complex consists of four subunits, including the catalytic pol-α subunit (p185), a regulatory B subunit (p70), and two primase subunits (p49 and p58). On an ssDNA template, the primase synthesizes short RNA primers from ribonucleoside triphosphates (rNTPs), which are elongated by pol-α in the presence of deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs) to form short DNA fragments. Through mechanisms requiring other replication factors, pol-α·primase is replaced by the more processive DNA polymerases pol-δ and pol-ε (7). Pol-ε synthesizes the leading strand, whereas pol-δ completes each Okazaki fragment initiated by pol-α·primase on the lagging strand and proofreads errors made by pol-α (7). The initiator RNA and DNA fragments are later removed by nucleases, and the Okazaki fragments are sealed by DNA ligase (7).The pol-α·primase complex is the only eukaryotic DNA polymerase able to initiate DNA synthesis de novo. In addition to initiating DNA replication and synthesizing Okazaki fragments, it appears to be one of the final targets of cell cycle checkpoint pathways that couple DNA replication to DNA damage response (2, 8). The role of RPA in initiation, elongation, and completion of lagging strand DNA synthesis has been thoroughly investigated (3, 9), but in vitro studies suggest that some additional factors that promote the rapidity of DNA replication in vivo are still lacking (2).In the course of purifying pol-α·primase from extracts of cultured mouse L1210 cells, we identified a factor we named α-accessory factor (AAF) that stimulates pol-α·primase activity in vitro (10, 11). The protein has a native molecular mass of ∼150 kDa as determined from its sedimentation coefficient and Stokes radius and is composed of two subunits of ∼132 and ∼44 kDa. AAF stimulates pol-α·primase activity with several different templates and types of reactions: (i) It stimulates selfprimed reactions with poly(dT), poly(dI·dT), or single-stranded circular DNA; (ii) it stimulates primed reactions with poly(dA)·oligo(dT) and multiply primed DNA in the absence of rNTPs, indicating that it affects pol-α activity when no primers are being made; and (iii) it stimulates primase activity on ssDNA in the absence of dNTPs, showing that it can enhance RNA primer synthesis in the absence of DNA synthesis (11). AAF increases the template affinity and processivity of pol-α·primase (12). AAF is highly specific for pol-α·primase and has no effect on the other mammalian DNA polymerases β, γ, or δ or on the DNA polymerase·primase complexes from Drosophila and Saccharomyces cerevisiae (11).The cloning of both AAF subunits based on peptide sequences obtained from the purified protein allowed us now to further characterize the AAF-44·AAF-132 complex structurally and functionally. Based on siRNA experiments in cancer cell lines, AAF appears to regulate DNA replication in vivo.     

Antarctic DNA barcoding; a drop in the ocean?

Coordinated, circum-Antarctic sampling expeditions during International Polar Year 2008/09 have given access to comprehensive collections suitable for DNA barcoding. Collaborations between the Census of Antarctic Marine Life (CAML), the Marine Barcode of Life project and the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding have enabled the Antarctic scientific community to initiate large-scale DNA barcoding projects to record the genetic diversity of Antarctic marine fauna, coordinated by the CAML Barcoding Campaign. A total of 20,355 marine specimens from more than 2,000 morphospecies covering 18 phyla are in the processing pipeline, and to date, 11,530 sequences have been processed with the remainder due by the end of 2010. Here, we present results on the current geographic and taxonomic coverage of DNA barcode data in the Southern Ocean and identify the remaining gaps. We show how DNA barcoding in the Antarctic is answering important questions regarding marine genetic diversity and challenging current assumptions of species distribution at the poles.     

A new site-specific endonuclease BbeI from Bifidobacterium breve: Restriction endonucleases; ; 3′-cohesive termini; DNA sequence analysis

A new site-specific endonuclease, BbeI, has been partially purified from the anaerobic bacterium, Bifidobac-terium breve. BbeI recognizes the hexanucleotide sequence

and cleaves it at the sites indicated by the arrows, producing 3′-cohesive termini four bases long.     

Comparison of Alexa Fluor<Superscript>®</Superscript> and CyDye<Superscript>™</Superscript> for practical DNA microarray use

Microarrays are a powerful tool for comparison and understanding of gene expression levels in healthy and diseased states. The method relies upon the assumption that signals from microarray features are a reflection of relative gene expression levels of the cell types under investigation. It has previously been reported that the classical fluorescent dyes used for microarray technology, Cy3 and Cy5, are not ideal due to the decreased stability and fluorescence intensity of the Cy5 dye relative to the Cy3, such that dye bias is an accepted phenomena necessitating dye swap experimental protocols and analysis of differential dye affects. The incentive to find new fluorophores is based on alleviating the problem of dye bias through synonymous performance between counterpart dyes. Alexa Fluor 555 and Alexa Fluor 647 are increasingly promoted as replacements for CyDye in microarray experiments. Performance relates to the molecular and steric similarities, which will vary for each new pair of dyes as well as the spectral integrity for the specific application required. Comparative analysis of the performance of these two competitive dye pairs in practical microarray applications is warranted towards this end. The findings of our study showed that both dye pairs were comparable but that conventional CyDye resulted in significantly higher signal intensities (P < 0.05) and signal minus background levels (P < 0.05) with no significant difference in background values (P > 0.05). This translated to greater levels of differential gene expression with CyDye than with the Alexa Fluor counterparts. However, CyDye fluorophores and in particular Cy5, were found to be less photostable over time and following repeated scans in microarray experiments. These results suggest that precautions against potential dye affects will continue to be necessary and that no one dye pair negates this need.     

Complementary DNA sequences encoding the rat MHC class II RT1-B<Superscript>u</Superscript> and RT1-D<Superscript>u</Superscript> α and β chains

The rat major histocompatibility complex loci RT1-B and RT1-D are equivalent to the human leucocyte antigens HLA-DQ and HLA-DR respectively. Here we describe the complementary DNA (cDNA) sequence encoding the and chains of both the RT1-B and RT1-D locus genes of the rat RT1^u haplotype. We have found entire sequence identity between five different inbred rat strains of the RT1^u haplotype, which differs from previously published, incomplete sequences. This information is of considerable value for experimental studies of transplantation immunity and autoimmune disease.Nucleotide sequences reported in this paper have been submitted to the EMBL nucleotide sequence database and have been assigned the accession numbers AJ554214 (RT1-B^ua), AJ554215 (RT1-B^ub) and AJ554216 (RT1-D^ua).     

DNA5′端~(32)P标记方法

在DNA的结构与功能研究中,其5′端~(32)P标记是常用的有效技术。下面我们从《Methods in Enzymolgy》Vol 65中摘译了DNA 5′端脱磷及~(32)P标记方法,供大家参考。 1.用磷酸单酯酶除去DNA链5′末端磷     

Discontinuous or semi‐discontinuous DNA replication in Escherichia coli?

The postulate that a stalled/collapsed replication fork will be generated when the replication complex encounters a UV-induced lesion in the template for leading-strand DNA synthesis is based on the model of semi-discontinuous DNA replication. A review of existing data indicates that the semi-discontinuous DNA replication model is supported by data from in vitro studies, while the discontinuous DNA replication model is supported by in vivo studies in Escherichia coli. Until the question of whether DNA replicates discontinuously in one or both strands is clearly resolved, any model building based on either one of the two DNA replication models should be treated with caution.     

Uptake and processing of DNA by Acinetobacter calcoaceticus – a review

In natural transformation, DNA in the form of macromolecular fragments can be translocated across the cell envelope of prokaryotic microorganisms. During the past two decades, several, largely mutually contradictory, hypotheses have been forwarded to explain the molecular mechanism and bioenergetics of this translocation process. Other biomacromolecules are translocated across the bacterial cell envelope as well, such as polysaccharides and proteins, the latter for instance in the process of the assembly of type-IV pili. This brings up the question whether or not common components are involved.Here, we review analyses of DNA translocation in Acinetobacter calcoaceticus, a Gram-negative eubacterium that is able to migrate through twitching motility, and also shows a high frequency of natural transformation. DNA uptake in this organism is an energy-dependent process. Upon entry into the cells, the DNA fragments are integrated into the resident chromosome when a sufficiently large region of mutual homology is available (200 to 400 bp). However, this process is rather inefficient, and on the average 500 bp of each incoming fragment is degraded through exonuclease activity. Upon covalent attachment of a bulky protein molecule to the transforming DNA, the DNA-translocation machinery becomes blocked in further translocation activity.Since A. calcoaceticus is not well suited for transposon mutagenesis, a random mutagenesis procedure has been developed, based on the ligation of an antibiotic-resistance marker to random fragments of chromosomal DNA. This method was used to generate several mutants impaired in the natural transformation process. Three of these have been characterized in detail. No components, common to the translocation of macromolecules through the cell envelope of Acinetobacter, have been detected in this screen.     

What is the mechanism of ParA‐mediated DNA movement?

The stable maintenance of low‐copy‐number plasmids requires active partitioning, with the most common mechanism in prokaryotes involving the ATPase ParA. ParA proteins undergo intricate spatiotemporal relocations across the nucleoid, dynamics that function to position plasmids at equally spaced intervals. This spacing naturally guarantees equal partitioning of plasmids to each daughter cell. However, the fundamental mechanism linking ParA dynamics with regular plasmid positioning has proved difficult to dissect. In this issue of Molecular Microbiology, Vecchiarelli et al. report on a time‐delay mechanism that allows a slow cycling between the nucleoid‐bound and unbound forms of ParA. The authors also propose a mechanism for plasmid movement that does not rely on ParA polymerization.     

Is DNA topoisomerase IIβ a nucleolar protein?

We have carried out immunofluorescence labelling of two human cell types, HeLa cells and peripheral blood lymphocytes, prepared by several different fixation/permeabilization protocols using a variety of antibodies against DNA Topoisomerase II (Topo II). We have found that the distribution of Topo IIα was overall similar during interphase and mitosis to that previously reported, regardless of antibody and of sample preparation. On the other hand, the interphase distribution of Topo IIβ was quite variable, depending both on the antibody and on the method used to prepare the sample. Our interpretation of the data is that, like Topo IIα, Topo IIβ is primarily a nucleoplasmic protein, but that unlike Topo IIα, small amounts are also associated with intranucleolar chromatin. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Synthesis,characterization, and studies on DNA binding of the complex Fe(Sal<Subscript>2</Subscript>dienNO<Subscript>3</Subscript>·H<Subscript>2</Subscript>O)

A new metal complex, Fe(Sal₂dienNO₃·H₂O) (where Sal is salicylaldehyde and dien is diethylenetriamine), has been synthesized and characterized. The interactions between the Fe(III) complex and calf thymus DNA has been investigated using UV and fluorescence spectra, viscosity, thermal denaturation, and molecular modeling. The cleavage reaction on plasmid DNA has been monitored by agarose gel electrophoresis. The experimental results show that the mode of binding of the complex to DNA is classical intercalation and the complex can cleave pBR322 DNA.     

Evolution of DNA polymerase <Emphasis Type="Italic">ι</Emphasis> structure and function in eukaryotes

Analysis of DNA polymerase iota (Pol iota) enzymic activity in different classes of eukaryotes has shown that error-prone activity of this enzyme can be found only in mammals, and that it is completely absent from organisms that are at lower stages of development. It was supposed that the emergence of the error-prone Pol iota activity in mammals is caused by structural alteration of the active center. Possible functions of error-prone Pol iota in higher eukaryotes are discussed.     

Initiation of New DNA Strands by the Herpes Simplex Virus-1 Primase-Helicase Complex and Either Herpes DNA Polymerase or Human DNA Polymerase ��

A key set of reactions for the initiation of new DNA strands during herpes simplex virus-1 replication consists of the primase-catalyzed synthesis of short RNA primers followed by polymerase-catalyzed DNA synthesis (i.e. primase-coupled polymerase activity). Herpes primase (UL5-UL52-UL8) synthesizes products from 2 to ∼13 nucleotides long. However, the herpes polymerase (UL30 or UL30-UL42) only elongates those at least 8 nucleotides long. Surprisingly, coupled activity was remarkably inefficient, even considering only those primers at least 8 nucleotides long, and herpes polymerase typically elongated <2% of the primase-synthesized primers. Of those primers elongated, only 4–26% of the primers were passed directly from the primase to the polymerase (UL30-UL42) without dissociating into solution. Comparing RNA primer-templates and DNA primer-templates of identical sequence showed that herpes polymerase greatly preferred to elongate the DNA primer by 650–26,000-fold, thus accounting for the extremely low efficiency with which herpes polymerase elongated primase-synthesized primers. Curiously, one of the DNA polymerases of the host cell, polymerase α (p70-p180 or p49-p58-p70-p180 complex), extended herpes primase-synthesized RNA primers much more efficiently than the viral polymerase, raising the possibility that the viral polymerase may not be the only one involved in herpes DNA replication.Herpes simplex virus 1 (HSV-1)² encodes seven proteins essential for replicating its double-stranded DNA genome; five of these encode the heterotrimeric helicase-primase (UL5-UL52-UL8 gene products) and the heterodimeric polymerase (UL30-UL42 gene products) (1, 2). The helicase-primase unwinds the DNA at the replication fork and generates single-stranded DNA for both leading and lagging strand synthesis. Primase synthesizes short RNA primers on the lagging strand that the polymerase presumably elongates using dNTPs (i.e. primase-coupled polymerase activity). These two protein complexes are thought to replicate the viral genome on both the leading and lagging strands (1, 2).Previous studies have focused on the helicase-primase and polymerase separately. The helicase-primase contains three subunits, UL5, UL52, and UL8 in a 1:1:1 ratio (3–5). The UL5 subunit has helicase-like motifs and the UL52 subunit has primase-like motifs, yet the minimal active complex that demonstrates either helicase or primase activities contains both UL5 and UL52 (6, 7). Although the UL8 subunit has no known catalytic activity, several functions have been proposed, including enhancing helicase and primase activities, enhancing primer synthesis on ICP8 (the HSV-1 single-stranded binding protein)-coated DNA strands, and facilitating formation of the replisome (8–12). Although primase will synthesize short (2–3 nucleotides long) primers on a variety of template sequences, synthesis of longer primers up to 13 nucleotides long requires the template sequence, 3′-deoxyguanidine-pyrimidine-pyrimidine-5′ (13). Primase initiates synthesis at the first pyrimidine via the polymerization of two purine NTPs (13). Even after initiation at this sequence, however, the vast majority of products are only 2–3 nucleotides long (13, 14).The herpes polymerase consists of the UL30 subunit, which has polymerase and 3′ → 5′ exonuclease activities (1, 2), and the UL42 subunit, which serves as a processivity factor (15–17). Unlike most processivity factors that encircle the DNA, the UL42 protein binds double-stranded DNA and thus directly tethers the polymerase to the DNA (18). Using pre-existing DNA primer-templates as the substrate, the heterodimeric polymerase (UL30-UL42) incorporates dNTPs at a rate of 150 s^–1, a rate much faster than primer synthesis (for primers >7 nucleotides long, 0.0002–0.01 s^–1) (19, 20).We examined primase-coupled polymerase activity by the herpes primase and polymerase complexes. Although herpes primase synthesizes RNA primers 2–13 nucleotides long, the polymerase only effectively elongates those at least 8 nucleotides long. Surprisingly, the polymerase elongated only a small fraction of the primase-synthesized primers (<1–2%), likely because of the polymerase elongating RNA primer-templates much less efficiently than DNA primer-templates. In contrast, human DNA polymerase α (pol α) elongated the herpes primase-synthesized primers very efficiently. The biological significance of these data is discussed.     

The Block of DNA Polymerase �� Strand Displacement Activity by an Abasic Site Can Be Rescued by the Concerted Action of DNA Polymerase �� and Flap Endonuclease 1

Abasic (AP) sites are very frequent and dangerous DNA lesions. Their ability to block the advancement of a replication fork has been always viewed as a consequence of their inhibitory effect on the DNA synthetic activity of replicative DNA polymerases (DNA pols). Here we show that AP sites can also affect the strand displacement activity of the lagging strand DNA pol δ, thus preventing proper Okazaki fragment maturation. This block can be overcome through a polymerase switch, involving the combined physical and functional interaction of DNA pol β and Flap endonuclease 1. Our data identify a previously unnoticed deleterious effect of the AP site lesion on normal cell metabolism and suggest the existence of a novel repair pathway that might be important in preventing replication fork stalling.Loss of purine and pyrimidine bases is a significant source of DNA damage in prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms. Abasic (apurinic and apyrimidinic) lesions occur spontaneously in DNA; in eukaryotes it has been estimated that about 10⁴ depurination and 10² depyrimidation events occur per genome per day. An equally important source of abasic DNA lesions results from the action of DNA glycosylases, such as uracil glycosylase, which excises uracil arising primarily from spontaneous deamination of cytosines (1). Although most AP sites are removed by the base excision repair (BER)⁵ pathway, a small fraction of lesions persists, and DNA with AP lesions presents a strong block to DNA synthesis by replicative DNA polymerases (DNA pols) (2, 3). Several studies have been performed to address the effects of AP sites on the template DNA strand on the synthetic activity of a variety of DNA pols. The major replicative enzyme of eukaryotic cells, DNA pol δ, was shown to be able to bypass an AP lesion, but only in the presence of the auxiliary factor proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) and at a very reduced catalytic efficiency if compared with an undamaged DNA template (4). On the other hand, the family X DNA pols β and λ were shown to bypass an AP site but in a very mutagenic way (5). Recent genetic evidence in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells showed that DNA pol δ is the enzyme replicating the lagging strand (6). According to the current model for Okazaki fragment synthesis (7–9), the action of DNA pol δ is not only critical for the extension of the newly synthesized Okazaki fragment but also for the displacement of an RNA/DNA segment of about 30 nucleotides on the pre-existing downstream Okazaki fragment to create an intermediate Flap structure that is the target for the subsequent action of the Dna2 endonuclease and the Flap endonuclease 1 (Fen-1). This process has the advantage of removing the entire RNA/DNA hybrid fragment synthesized by the DNA pol α/primase, potentially containing nucleotide misincorporations caused by the lack of a proofreading exonuclease activity of DNA pol α/primase. This results in a more accurate copy synthesized by DNA pol δ. The intrinsic strand displacement activity of DNA pol δ, in conjunction with Fen-1, PCNA, and replication protein A (RP-A), has been also proposed to be essential for the S phase-specific long patch BER pathway (10, 11). Although it is clear that an AP site on the template strand is a strong block for DNA pol δ-dependent synthesis on single-stranded DNA, the functional consequences of such a lesion on the ability of DNA pol δ to carry on strand displacement synthesis have never been investigated so far. Given the high frequency of spontaneous hydrolysis and/or cytidine deamination events, any detrimental effect of an AP site on the strand displacement activity of DNA pol δ might have important consequences both for lagging strand DNA synthesis and for long patch BER. In this work, we addressed this issue by constructing a series of synthetic gapped DNA templates with a single AP site at different positions with respect to the downstream primer to be displaced by DNA pol δ (see Fig. 1A). We show that an AP site immediately upstream of a single- to double-strand DNA junction constitutes a strong block to the strand displacement activity of DNA pol δ, even in the presence of RP-A and PCNA. Such a block could be resolved only through a “polymerase switch” involving the concerted physical and functional interaction of DNA pol β and Fen-1. The closely related DNA pol λ could only partially substitute for DNA pol β. Based on our data, we propose that stalling of a replication fork by an AP site not only is a consequence of its ability to inhibit nucleotide incorporation by the replicative DNA pols but can also stem from its effects on strand displacement during Okazaki fragment maturation. In summary, our data suggest the existence of a novel repair pathway that might be important in preventing replication fork stalling and identify a previously unnoticed deleterious effect of the AP site lesion on normal cell metabolism.Open in a separate windowFIGURE 1.An abasic site immediately upstream of a double-stranded DNA region inhibits the strand displacement activity of DNA polymerase δ. The reactions were performed as described under “Experimental Procedures.” A, schematic representation of the various DNA templates used. The size of the resulting gaps is indicated in nt. The position of the AP site on the 100-mer template strand is indicated relative to the 3′ end. Base pairs in the vicinity of the lesion are indicated by dashes. The size of the gaps (35–38 nt) is consistent with the size of ssDNA covered by a single RP-A molecule, which has to be released during Okazaki fragment synthesis when the DNA pol is approaching the 5′-end of the downstream fragment. When the AP site is covered by the downstream terminator oligonucleotide (Gap-3 and Gap-1 templates) the nucleotide placed on the opposite strand is C to mimic the situation generated by spontaneous loss of a guanine or excision of an oxidized guanine, whereas when the AP site is covered by the primer (nicked AP template), the nucleotide placed on the opposite strand is A to mimic the most frequent incorporation event occurring opposite an AP site. B, human PCNA was titrated in the presence of 15 nm (lanes 2–4 and 10–12) or 30 nm (lanes 6–8 and 14–16) recombinant human four subunit DNA pol δ, on a linear control (lanes 1–8) or a 38-nt gap control (lanes 9–16) template. Lanes 1, 5, 9, and 13, control reactions in the absence of PCNA. C, human PCNA was titrated in the presence of 60 nm DNA pol δ, on a linear AP (lanes 2–4) or 38-nt gap AP (lanes 6–9) template. Lanes 1 and 5, control reactions in the absence of PCNA.