Comparison of the effect of estradiol benzoate plus progesterone and GnRH on the follicular wave emergence and subsequent follicular development in CIDR-treated, lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts

This study examined the effect of estradiol benzoate (EB) plus progesterone (P4) as compared with GnRH on follicular wave emergence and follicular development, and synchrony of ovulation and pregnancy rates following a second injection of GnRH in a controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based timed AI (TAI) protocol in lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts. Lactating dairy cows diagnosed with follicular cysts received a CIDR device, with an injection of 2mg EB plus 50mg P4 (EB+P4 group) or with an injection of 100 microg GnRH (GnRH group) at the beginning of the experiment (day 0). Thereafter, all received PGF(2alpha) at the time of CIDR removal on day 7, GnRH on day 9, and TAI 16 h later. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 12/15 EB plus P4-treated and 14/15 GnRH-treated cows (P>0.05). The interval to wave emergence was longer in the EB+P4 group (4.8+/-0.4 days) than in the GnRH group (2.0+/-0.2 days). The mean diameters of preovulatory follicles and the proportion of cows with preovulatory follicles greater than 12 mm on day 9 did not differ between groups (P>0.05). The proportion of cows with synchronized ovulations by 40 h after the GnRH injection on day 11 and pregnancy rates to TAI did not differ between the EB+P4 (13/15 and 36.7%) and the GnRH (14/15 and 53.3%) groups, respectively. Results suggest that a single treatment with EB plus P4 as compared with GnRH simultaneously with CIDR insertion in lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts will result in relatively asynchronous emergence of a new follicular wave, but subsequently similar sizes of preovulatory follicles and synchronous ovulation, resulting in similar pregnancy rates to TAI.     

A progesterone-based timed AI protocol more effectively prevents premature estrus and incomplete luteal regression than an Ovsynch protocol in lactating Holstein cows

The objective of this study was to evaluate pregnancy rates in lactating Holstein cows treated with an Ovsynch protocol (GnRH-PGF(2alpha)-GnRH) or a progesterone-based timed AI (TAI) protocol, and to determine the factors that may influence pregnancy rate following protocol treatment. In experiment 1, lactating Holstein cows were randomly assigned to three treatments: (1) an injection of GnRH (Day 0), an injection of PGF(2alpha) on Day 7, a second injection of GnRH on Day 9, and TAI 16h after the second GnRH injection (GPG group, n = 34); (2) insertion of a CIDR intravaginal progesterone (1.9g) device combined with a capsule containing 10mg estradiol benzoate (Day 0), an injection of PGF(2alpha) and removal of the device on Day 7, an injection of GnRH on Day 9, and TAI 16h after the GnRH injection (CPG group, n = 34); (3) an injection of PGF(2alpha) after confirming the presence of CL by ultrasonographical observation and artificial insemination at estrus (AIE) (P group, n = 75). The pregnancy rate after TAI following the CPG protocol (41.2%) was higher (P<0.05) than that after TAI following the GPG protocol (20.6%) and that after AIE (20.0%). In experiment 2, lactating Holstein cows were randomly assigned to two treatments: a GPG group (n = 31) and a CPG group (n = 31). The GPG and CPG protocols were identical to those used in experiment 1. The proportion of cows with premature estrus prior to injection of PGF(2alpha) and with incomplete luteal regression tended (P = 0.056) to be or were greater (P<0.05) in the GPG group (4/31, 8/31) than in the CPG group (0/31, 2/31), respectively. Average diameters of dominant follicles (1.5+/-0.1mm versus 1.4+/-0.1mm) on Day 7 and preovulatory follicles (1.8+/-0.1mm versus 1.6+/-0.1mm) on Day 9, and the proportion of cows with synchronized ovulation by 40h after the second GnRH injection were not different (81.5% versus 87.1%, P>0.05) between groups, respectively. We conclude that the pregnancy rate after TAI following the CPG protocol was higher than that after TAI following the GPG protocol, probably due to a decreased incidence of premature estrus and incomplete luteal regression.     

Follicular wave emergence, luteal function and synchrony of ovulation following GnRH or estradiol benzoate in a CIDR-treated, lactating Holstein cows

This study evaluated the effect of GnRH or estradiol benzoate (EB) on follicular wave emergence and progesterone concentrations, and following a second injection of GnRH, synchrony of ovulation, and pregnancy rates in a controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based timed AI (TAI) protocol in lactating Holstein cows. Cows received a CIDR device without hormone (controls), with an injection of 100 microg GnRH or with an injection of 4 mg EB. Thereafter, all received PGF(2 alpha) at the time of CIDR removal on Day 7, GnRH on Day 9, and TAI 16 h later. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 19/20 GnRH-treated, 14/20 EB-treated and 5/20 control cows (P < 0.05). The interval to wave emergence was the shorter and less variable (P < 0.01) in the GnRH group (2.9 +/- 0.2 days) than in the EB (4.7 +/- 0.5 days) or control (4.8 +/- 1.0 days) groups. Serum progesterone concentrations from Days 4 to 7 were higher (P < 0.01) in the GnRH-treated cows that ovulated than in those that did not ovulate, or in control and EB-treated cows. The diameters of dominant follicle on Day 7 differed among groups (P < 0.01), and the diameters of the preovulatory follicle on Day 9 were larger (P < 0.01) in the control and GnRH groups than in the EB group. The proportion of cows with synchronized ovulations did not differ among groups, but pregnancy rate to TAI was higher (P < 0.05) in the GnRH group (65%; 13/20) than in the control (30%; 6/20) or EB (35%; 7/20) groups. Results suggest that GnRH treatment of CIDR-treated lactating Holstein cows will result in synchronous follicular wave emergence, large preovulatory follicles and synchronous ovulation, resulting in an acceptable pregnancy rates to TAI.     

Resynchronization of ovulation and timed insemination in lactating dairy cows III. Administration of GnRH 23 days post AI and ultrasonography for nonpregnancy diagnosis on day 30

The objective was to compare pregnancy rates to resynchronization and timed AI (TAI) protocols in lactating dairy cows that received GnRH at 23 d and were diagnosed not pregnant at 30 d after the pre-enrollment AI. Nonpregnant cows (624) at ultrasonography on day 30 (study day 0) were classified as diestrus (74.8%), metestrus (5.6%) and without a CL (19.5%). Cows in diestrus were assigned either to the GnRH group (PGF2alpha on day 0, GnRH on day 2 and TAI 16 h later, n = 238) or the estradiol cypionate (ECP) group (PGF2alpha on day 0, ECP on day 1, and TAI 36 h later, n = 229). Cows in metestrus were assigned to the Modified Heatsynch Group (GnRH on day 0, PGF(2alpha) on day 7, ECP on day 8 and TAI on day 9, n = 35). Cows without a CL (n = 122) were classified either as proestrus (10.6%), ovarian cysts (7.5%) or anestrus (1.4%), and assigned to factorial treatments (i.e., use of GnRH versus CIDR) to either the GnRH group (GnRH on day 0, PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9 and TAI 16 h later, n = 28), the CIDR group (CIDR insert from days 0 to 7, PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9 and TAI 16 h later, n = 34), the GnRH + CIDR group (GnRH on day 0, CIDR insert from days 0 to 7, PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9 and TAI 16h later, n = 32), and the control group (PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9 and TAI 16 h later, n = 28). For cows without a CL, plasma P4 concentrations were determined on days 0, 7, 10 and 17 and ovarian structures determined on days 0, 7 and 17. Pregnancy rates were evaluated at 30, 55 and 90 d after the resynchronized AI. For cows in diestrus, there were no differences in pregnancy rates on days 30, 55 and 90 for cows in the GnRH (27.5, 26.5 and 24.2%) or ECP (29.1, 25.5 and 24.1%) groups. In addition, there were no differences in pregnancy losses between days 30 and 55 and 55 and 90 between the GnRH (7.0 and 8.6%) and ECP (9.8 and 5.4%) groups. For cows without a CL, GnRH on day 0 increased the proportion of cows with a CL on days 7 and 17 and plasma P4 concentration on day 17 in cows with ovarian cysts but not for cows in proestrus. The CIDR insert increased pregnancy rate in cows with ovarian cysts but reduced pregnancy rate for cows in proestrus.     

Strategic treatment of anovular dairy cows with GnRH

The primary objective was to evaluate fertility of anovular dairy cows given GnRH 4 d after first postpartum timed AI (TAI). Secondary objectives were to determine ovulatory response to treatment, effect of treatment on serum progesterone (P(4)) concentrations, and the proportion with a short luteal phase. Lactating Holstein cows (n=1047) were submitted for first postpartum TAI using a Presynch+Ovsynch protocol. Anovular cows were identified from an initial 1047 lactating Holstein cows using transrectal ultrasonography, based on the absence of a CL at the first GnRH injection of a Presynch+Ovsynch protocol, and anovular cows were randomly assigned to receive either no further treatment (Control, n=85), or 100 microg of GnRH 4 d after TAI (GnRH treated; n=71). For GnRH treated cows, 51% responded by ovulating a follicle in response to GnRH treatment 4 d after TAI; however, pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ between GnRH treated cows that ovulated (36%) compared to GnRH treated cows that did not ovulate (21%). There was a quadratic effect of P(4) at the PGF(2 alpha) injection of Ovsynch on P/AI, and cows with P(4)>or=1 ng/mL at the PGF(2 alpha) injection of Ovsynch had greater P/AI (41%) than cows with P(4)<1 ng/mL (12%); however, no treatment difference was detected. Overall, P/AI did not differ between control (30.1%) and GnRH treated (29.6%) treatments for synchronized cows. Although treatment of anovular cows with GnRH 4 d after TAI failed to improve fertility, variation among cows in serum P(4) at the PGF(2 alpha) injection of Ovsynch dramatically affected fertility of anovular dairy cows.     

Synchronization and resynchronization of inseminations in lactating dairy cows with the CIDR insert and the Ovsynch protocol

Pregnancy per artificial insemination (AI) was evaluated in dairy cows (Bos taurus) subjected to synchronization and resynchronization for timed AI (TAI). Cows (n = 718) received prostaglandin F_2α (PGF) on Days –38 and –24 (Days 39 and 53 postpartum), gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) on Day –10, PGF on Day –3, and GnRH and TAI on Day 0. Between Days –10 and –3, cows received a progesterone intravaginal insert (CIDR group) or no CIDR (Control group). Between Days 14 and 23, cows received a CIDR (Resynch CIDR group) or no CIDR (Resynch control group), GnRH on Day 23, with pregnancy diagnosis on Day 30. Cows in estrus (between Days 0 and 30) were re-inseminated at detected estrus (RIDE). Nonpregnant cows received PGF on Day 30 and GnRH and TAI on Day 33. Plasma progesterone was determined to be low or high on Days –24 and –10. Pregnancy rates were evaluated 30 and 55 d after AI. The CIDR insert included in the Presynch-Ovsynch protocol did not increase overall pregnancy per AI for first service (36.1% and 33.6% for CIDR; 34.1% and 28.8% for Control) but did decrease pregnancy loss (7.0% for CIDR and 15.6% for Control). The CIDR insert increased pregnancy per AI in cows with high progesterone at the time the CIDR insert was applied. Administration of a CIDR insert between Days 14 and 23 of the estrous cycle after first service did not increase overall pregnancy per AI to second service (24.7% and 22.7% for Resynch CIDR; 28.6% and 25.3% for Resynch control). For second service, RIDE cows had lower pregnancy rates in the Resynch CIDR group than in the Resynch control group. Cows with a CL (corpus luteum) at Day 30 had higher pregnancy rates in the Resynch CIDR group than those in the Resynch control group.     

Effect of timing of prostaglandin administration, controlled internal drug release removal and gonadotropin releasing hormone administration on pregnancy rate in fixed-time AI protocols in crossbred Angus cows

Two experiments were conducted to investigate the effects of timing of prostaglandin F2(alpha) (PGF2(alpha)) administration, controlled internal drug release device (CIDR) removal and second gonodotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) administration on the pregnancy outcome in CIDR-based synchronization protocols. In Experiment 1, suckled Angus crossbred beef cows (n = 580) were given 100 microg of GnRH+a CIDR on Day 0. Cows in Group 1 (modified Ovsynch-P) received 25 mg of dinoprost (PGF2(alpha)) and CIDR device removal on Day 8 (AM), 100 microg of GnRH 36 h later on Day 9 (p.m.), and fixed-time AI (FTAI) 16 h later on Day 10 (47.5+/-1.1 h after PGF2(alpha)). Cows in Group 2 (Ovsynch-P) received 25mg of PGF2(alpha) and CIDR device removal on Day 7 (p.m.), 100 microg of GnRH 48 h later on Day 9 and FTAI 16 h later on Day 10 (66.6+/-1.2 h after PGF2(alpha)). Pregnancy rates were 56.5% (170/301) for Group 1 and 55.6% (155/279) for Group 2, respectively (P = 0.47). In Experiment 2, beef cows (n=734) were synchronized with 100 microg of GnRH+CIDR on Day 0, 25 mg of PGF2(alpha) and CIDR device removal on Day 7 and either 100 microg of GnRH 48 h later on Day 9 (Ovsynch-P) and FTAI 16 h later on Day 10 (64.9+/-3.3 h from PGF2(alpha)) or 100 microg of GnRH on Day 10 (CO-Synch-P) at the time of AI (63.2+/-4.2 h from PGF2(alpha)). Pregnancy rates were 48.8% (180/369) for Ovsynch-P and 44.7% (163/365) for CO-synch-P groups, respectively (P = 0.11). In both experiments, there was a locationxtreatment interaction (P<0.05); pregnancy rates between locations were different (P < 0.05) in the Ovsynch-P group. In conclusion, in a CIDR-based Ovsynch synchronization protocol, delaying administration of prostaglandin and CIDR removal by 12 h, or timing of the second GnRH by 16 h, did not affect pregnancy rates to FTAI. Therefore, there may be an opportunity to make changes in synchronization protocols with out adversely affecting FTAI pregnancy rates.     

Effect of timing of Cosynch on fertility of lactating Holstein cows after first postpartum and Resynch timed-AI services

To compare two intervals from the PGF(2alpha) injection to the second GnRH injection+timed artificial insemination (TAI) of Ovsynch, lactating Holstein cows received their first postpartum TAI after Presynch + Ovsynch (n=352) and second and greater postpartum TAI after resynchronization of ovulation using Ovsynch (Resynch; n=458). Each week, cows housed in each of four breeding pens were randomized by breeding pen to receive the second GnRH injection of Presynch + Ovsynch or Resynch and TAI either 48 h (Cosynch 48; n=382) or 72 h (Cosynch 72; n=428) after the PGF(2alpha) injection of Ovsynch or Resynch. Overall, pregnancies per AI (P/AI) did not differ for cows receiving Cosynch 48 (29%) versus Cosynch 72 (33%). Furthermore, treatment did not affect P/AI for cows receiving first postpartum TAI after Presynch + Ovsynch, for cows receiving second and greater TAI after Resynch, or the proportion of female calves born. In conclusion, delaying the second GnRH injection and TAI from 48 to 72 h after the PGF(2alpha) injection of Ovsynch did not affect P/AI or calf sex ratio. The lack of a difference in fertility between these Cosynch protocols may offer more flexibility for implementing a systematic synchronization protocol when a Cosynch strategy is used.     

Effect of an implant containing the GnRH agonist deslorelin on secretion of LH, ovarian activity and milk yield of postpartum dairy cows

Prevention of high plasma progesterone concentrations in the early postpartum period may improve fertility. Our objective was to determine whether a Deslorelin implant (DESL; 2100 microg, s.c.) would reduce secretion of LH and alter follicle dynamics, plasma concentrations of progesterone, estradiol and PGF2alpha metabolite (PGFM) in postpartum dairy cows. Cows received DESL on Day 7 postpartum (Day 7, n=8) or were untreated (Control, n=9). All cows were injected with GnRH (100 microg, i.m.) on Day 14 to assess LH response. A protocol for synchronization of ovulation with timed AI was initiated on Day 60 (GnRH [Day 60], CIDR [Day 60 to Day 67], PGF2alpha [Day 67, 25 mg and Day 68, 15 mg], GnRH [Day 69] , AI [Day 70]). The LH response to injection of GnRH on Day 14 was blocked in animals treated with DESL. Numbers of Class 1 (<6 mm) follicles were unaffected (P > 0.05) whereas numbers of Class 2 (6 to 9 mm) (P < 0.01) and Class 3 (>9 mm) follicles were less (P < 0.01) in DESL cows between Day 7 and Day 21. From Day 22 to Day 60, DESL-treated cows had more of Class 1 follicles and less Class 2 (P < 0.01) and Class 3 (P < 0.01) follicles, and lower plasma concentrations of progesterone and estradiol (P < 0.01). Concentrations of PGFM between Day 7 and Day 42 were not affected by treatment (P > 0.05). All cows ovulated in response to GnRH on Day 69. Subsequent luteal phase increases in plasma progesterone concentrations (Day 70 to Day 84) did not differ. The use of the DESL implant associated with PGF2alpha given 14 days later suppressed ovarian activity and caused plasma progesterone concentrations to remain < 1 ng/mL between Day 22 and Day 51. The DESL implant did not affect milk production.     

Effect of the first GnRH and two doses of PGF2α in a 5-day progesterone-based CO-Synch protocol on heifer pregnancy

The objectives were (1) to determine the effects of gonadorelin hydrochloride (GnRH) injection at controlled internal drug release (CIDR) insertion on Day 0 and the number of PGF2α doses at CIDR removal on Day 5 in a 5-day CO-Synch + CIDR program on pregnancy rate (PR) to artificial insemination (AI) in heifers; (2) to examine how the effect of systemic concentration of progesterone and size of follicles influenced treatment outcome. Angus cross beef heifers (n = 1018) at eight locations and Holstein dairy heifers (n = 1137) at 15 locations were included in this study. On Day 0, heifers were body condition scored (BCS), and received a CIDR. Within farms, heifers were randomly divided into two groups: at the time of CIDR insertion, the GnRH group received 100 μg of GnRH and No-GnRH group received none. On Day 5, all heifers received 25 mg of PGF2α at the time of CIDR insert removal. The GnRH and No-GnRH groups were further divided into 1PGF and 2PGF groups. The heifers in 2PGF group received a second dose of PGF2α 6 hours after the administration of the first dose. Beef heifers underwent AI at 56 hours and dairy heifers at 72 hours after CIDR removal and received 100 μg of GnRH at the time of AI. Pregnancy was determined approximately at 35 and/or 70 days after AI. Controlling for herd effect (P < 0.06), the treatments had significant effect on AI pregnancy in beef heifers (P = 0.03). The AI-PRs were 50.3%, 50.2%, 59.7%, and 58.3% for No-GnRH + PGF + GnRH, No-GnRH + 2PGF + GnRH, GnRH + PGF + GnRH, and GnRH + 2PGF + GnRH groups, respectively. The AI-PRs were ranged from 50% to 62.4% between herds. Controlling for herd effects (P < 0.01) and for BCS (P < 0.05), the AI pregnancy was not different among the treatment groups in dairy heifers (P > 0.05). The AI-PRs were 51.2%, 51.9%, 53.9%, and 54.5% for No-GnRH + PGF + GnRH, No-GnRH + 2PGF + GnRH, GnRH + PGF + GnRH, and GnRH + 2PGF + GnRH groups, respectively. The AI-PR varied among locations from 48.3% to 75.0%. The AI-PR was 43.5%, 50.4%, and 64.2% for 2.5 or less, 2.75 to 3.5, and greater than 3.5 BCS categories. Numerically higher AI-PRs were observed in beef and dairy heifers that exhibited high progesterone concentrations at the time of CIDR insertion (>1 ng/mL, with a CL). In addition, numerically higher AI-PRs were also observed in heifers receiving CIDR + GnRH with both high and low progesterone concentration (<1 ng/mL) initially compared with heifers receiving a CIDR only with low progesterone. In dairy heifers, there were no differences in the pregnancy loss between 35 and 70 days post-AI among the treatment groups (P > 0.1). In conclusion, GnRH administration at the time of CIDR insertion is advantageous in beef heifers, but not in dairy heifers, to improve AI-PR in the 5-day CIDR + CO-Synch protocol. In addition, in this study, both dairy heifers that received either one or two PGF2α doses at CIDR removal resulted in similar AI-PR in this study regardless of whether they received GnRH at CIDR insertion.     

Persistent ovarian follicles in dairy cows: a therapeutic approach

Anestrus is common during the postpartum period in high-producing dairy cows. In a previous investigation, we were able to diagnose persistent follicles of 8 to 12 mm in anestrous cows. This report describes 2 consecutive studies. The objectives of the first were to 1) assess the association of persistent follicles with anestrus; and 2) evaluate 2 therapeutic treatments. In the second study, we compared the effectiveness of the best treatment established in Study 1 with the Ovsynch protocol. For Study 1, anestrous cows were considered to have a persistent follicle if it was possible to observe a single follicular structure > 8 mm in the absence of a corpus luteum or a cyst in 2 ultrasonographic examinations performed at an interval of 7 d. At diagnosis (Day 0), cows were assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups. Cows in Group GnRH/PGF (n=17) were treated with 100 microg GnRH i.m., and 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 14. Cows in Group PRID (n=18) were fitted with a progesterone releasing intravaginal device (PRID, containing 1.55 g of progesterone) for 9 d and were given 100 microg GnRH i.m. at the time of PRID insertion, and 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 7. Cows in Group Control (n=18) received no treatment. The animals were inseminated at observed estrus and were monitored weekly by ultrasonography until AI or 5 weeks from diagnosis. Blood samples were also collected on a weekly basis for progesterone determination. The mean size of persistent follicles on Day 0 was 9.4 +/- 0.04 mm. Progesterone levels were < 0.2 ng/mL during the first 35 d in 16 of 18 Control cows. Cows in the PRID group showed a lower persistent follicle rate (16.7% < 70.6% < 88.9%; P < 0.0001; PRID vs GnRH/PGF vs Control, respectively); a higher estrus detection rate (83.3% > 29.4% > 11.1%; P < 0.0001) and a higher pregnancy rate (27.8% > 5.9% > 0%; P = 0.02). For the second study, 145 cows with persistent follicles were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups: cows in Group Ovsynch (n=73) were treated with 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day 0, 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 7, and 100 microm GnRH i.m. 32 h later. Cows in this group were inseminated 16 to 20 h after the second GnRH dose (Ovsynch protocol). Cows in Group PRID (n=72) were treated as those in the PRID group of Study 1, and were inseminated 56 h after PRID removal. Cows in the PRID group showed a higher ovulation rate (84.8% > 8.2%: P < 0.0001); a higher pregnancy rate (34.2% > 4.1%; P < 0.0001) and lower follicular persistence rate (22.2% < 63%; P < 0.0001) than those in Ovsynch. Our results indicate that persistent follicles affect cyclic ovarian function in lactating dairy cows. Cows with persistent follicles can be successfully synchronized and time inseminated using progesterone, GnRH and PGF2alpha but show a limited response to treatment with GnRH plus PGF2alpha.     

Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2alpha and GnRH

This paper reports a new method for synchronizing the time of ovulation in cattle using GnRH and PGF(2alpha). In Experiments 1 and 2, lactating dairy cows (n=20) ranging from 36 to 280 d postpartum and dairy heifers (n=24) 14 to 16 mo old were treated with an intramuscular injection of 100 mug GnRH at a random stage of the estrous cycle. Seven d later the cattle received PGF(2alpha) to regress corpora lutea (CL). Lactating cows and heifers received a second injection of 100 mug GnRH 48 and 24 h later, respectively. Lactating cows were artificially inseminated 24 h after the second GnRH injection. Ovarian morphology was monitored daily by trans-rectal ultrasonography from 5 d prior to treatment until ovulation. In Experiment 3, the flexibility in the timing of hormonal injections with this synchronization protocol was evaluated by randomly assigning 66 lactating dairy cows to 3 different treatment groups. Lactating cows received the injection of PGF(2alpha) 48 (Group 1), 24 (Group 2), and 0 h (Group 3) prior to the second injection of GnRH, which was administered at the same time in each group to ensure the second injection of GnRH was given when follicles were at a similar stage of growth. In Experiments 1 and 2, the first injection of GnRH caused ovulation and formation of a new or accessory CL in 18 20 cows and 13 24 heifers. In addition, this injection of GnRH initiated or was coincident with initiation of a new follicular wave in 20 20 lactating cows and 18 24 heifers. Corpora lutea regressed after PGF(2alpha) in 20 20 cows and in 18 24 heifers. All cows and 18 24 heifers ovulated a newly formed dominant follicle between 24 and 32 h after the second injection of GnRH. Ten of 20 cows conceived to the timed artificial insemination. In Experiment 3, the conception rate in Groups 1 and 2 were greater than in Group 3, (55 and 46 % vs 11%, respectively). In summary, this protocol could have a major impact on managing reproduction in lactating dairy cows, because it allows for AI to occur at a known time of ovulation and eliminates the need for detection of estrus.     

Resynchronization of ovulation and timed insemination in lactating dairy cows I: use of the Ovsynch and Heatsynch protocols after non-pregnancy diagnosis by ultrasonography

The objective was to compare pregnancy rates and pregnancy losses in lactating dairy cows that were diagnosed not pregnant and re-inseminated following either the Ovsynch or Heatsynch protocols. Also evaluated were the effects of stages of the estrous cycle, ovarian cysts and anestrus on pregnancy rates for both treatments. Non-pregnant cows (n = 332) as determined by ultrasonography on day 27 post-AI (study day 0) were divided into two groups. Cows in the Ovsynch group (n = 166) received GnRH on day 0, PGF2alpha on day 7, GnRH on day 9, and timed AI (TAI) 16 h later (day 10). Cows in the Heatsynch group (n = 166) received GnRH on day 0, PGF2alpha on day 7, estradiol cypionate (ECP) on day 8, and TAI 48 h later (day 10). Cows detected in estrus on days 8 and 9 were inseminated and included in the study. On day 0, cows were classified according to different stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus. Pregnancy rates were evaluated 27, 45 and 90 days after resynchronized AI. Overall, there was no difference in pregnancy rates on days 27, 45 and 90 between cows in the Ovsynch (25.2, 17.5, and 13.9%) and Heatsynch (25.8, 19.9, and 16.1%) groups. There was no difference in pregnancy losses from days 27 to 45 and days 45 to 90 for cows in the Ovsynch (25.0 and 17.9%) and Heatsynch (14.7 and 10.3%) groups. However, pregnancy rates were increased when cows in metestrus were subjected to the Heatsynch protocol and cows with ovarian cysts were subjected to the Ovsynch protocol.     

Effect of presynchronization strategy before Ovsynch on fertility at first service in lactating dairy cows

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of presynchronization with or without the detection of estrus on first service pregnancy per artificial insemination (P/AI) and on Ovsynch outcome in lactating dairy cows. A total of 511 cows were divided randomly but unevenly into 3 treatment groups at 44 to 50 days in milk (DIM). Ovsynch was started at the same time (69 to 75 DIM) in all three groups. Cows in the Ovsynch group (CON, N = 126) received no presynchronization before Ovsynch, and all cows were bred by timed AI (TAI). Cows in the presynchronization with estrus detection (PED) and the presynchronization with only TAI (PTAI) groups received two doses of prostaglandin F_2α (PGF) 14 days apart, starting at 44 to 50 DIM. Ovsynch was initiated 11 days after the second PGF treatment. Cows in the PED group (N = 267) received AI if estrus was detected after either PGF injection. Cows that were not determined to be in estrus after PGF injection received Ovsynch and TAI. Cows in the PTAI group (N = 118) were not inseminated to estrus, with all cows receiving TAI after Ovsynch. The ovulatory response to the first GnRH injection administered as part of Ovsynch differed (P = 0.002) among treatment groups (83.1% in PTAI, 72.6% in PED, and 62.7% in CON). However, the ovulatory response to the second injection of GnRH during Ovsynch did not differ among treatment groups. Of the 267 PED cows, a total of 132 (49.4%) exhibited estrus and were inseminated. The P/AI at the 31-day pregnancy diagnosis was similar between the cows in the PED group with AI after estrus detection (37.9%; 50/132) and those bred with TAI (34.1%; 46/135). The P/AI in the CON group (46.8%; 59/126) was greater (P < 0.05) than that in the PED group (36.0%; 96/267). In addition, the P/AI in the CON group was greater (P = 0.04) than that in the PED cows receiving TAI (34.1%; 46/135) but less than that in the PED cows bred to estrus (37.9%; 50/132) (P = 0.16). At the 31-day pregnancy diagnosis, the cows in the PTAI group had greater P/AI (55.9%; 66/118) than both those in the PED group (P < 0.01; either estrus or TAI) and those in the CON group (P = 0.08). Thus, presynchronization with PGF (PTAI) increased the ovulatory response to Ovsynch and improved P/AI in dairy cows. Interestingly, the breeding of cows to estrus during presynchronization reduced fertility to the TAI and overall fertility, including cows bred to estrus and TAI. These results indicate that maximal fertility is obtained when all cows receive TAI after the presynchronization protocol.     

Comparison of synchronization of ovulation with timed insemination and exogenous progesterone as therapeutic strategies for ovarian cysts in lactating dairy cows

The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of the Ovsynch and controlled internal drug releasing (CIDR) protocols under commercial conditions for the treatment of cystic ovarian disease in dairy cattle. A total of 401 lactating dairy cows with ovarian cysts were alternatively allocated to two treatment groups on the day of diagnosis. Cows in the Ovsynch group were treated with GnRH on Day 0, PGF2alpha on Day 7, GnRH on Day 9, with timed insemination 16-20 h later. Cows in the CIDR group were treated with a CIDR insert on Day 0 for 7 days; on Day 7, the CIDR was removed, and cows were treated with PGF2alpha. All cows in the CIDR group were observed for estrus and cows exhibiting estrus within 7 days following removal of the CIDR and PGF2alpha administration were inseminated. The outcomes of interest for this experiment were the likelihood to be inseminated, return to cyclicity (determined by a CL on Day 21), conception and pregnancy rates. Data for these variables were analyzed using logistic regression. The percentage of cows inseminated in the Ovsynch and CIDR groups were 82 and 44%, respectively. Cows in the Ovsynch group were 5.8 times more likely to be inseminated than cows in the CIDR group. Cows with a low BCS were 0.48 times less likely to be inseminated than cows with a high BCS. The percentage of cows with a CL on Day 21 for the Ovsynch and CIDR groups was 83 and 79%, respectively (P > 0.05). Cows with a low BCS were 0.49 times less likely to have CL on Day 21 than cows with a high BCS. Conception and pregnancy rates for cows in the Ovsynch group were 18.3 and 14.4%, respectively. Conception and pregnancy rates for cows in the CIDR group were 23.1 and 9.5%, respectively. There was no significant differences between conception or pregnancy rates in cows in both groups. Primiparous cows were 2.6 times more likely to conceive than multiparous cows. In conclusion, the results of this study suggested that fertility was not different between cows with ovarian cysts treated with either the Ovsynch or the CIDR protocols in this dairy herd. In addition, primiparous cows had an increased likelihood for conception compared to multiparous cows, and cows with a low BCS were less likely to be inseminated or have a CL on Day 21, regardless of treatment.     

Modifications of the G6G timed-AI protocol improved pregnancy per AI and reduced pregnancy loss in lactating dairy cows

In dairy cows, subjected to a G6G protocol, objectives were to determine effects of (1) extending the interval from prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α) to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) during presynchronization; and (2) adding a second PGF2α treatment before artificial insemination (AI), on ovarian response, plasma progesterone (P4) concentrations and pregnancy per AI (P/AI). In a 2×2 factorial design, lactating cows were randomly assigned to one of four timed AI (TAI) protocols: (1) G6G (n=149), one injection of PGF2α, GnRH 2 days later and a 7-day Ovsynch (GnRH, 7 days, PGF2α, 56 h, GnRH, 16 h, TAI) was initiated 6 days later; (2) G6GP (n=144), an additional PGF2α treatment (24 h after the first) during Ovsynch of the G6G protocol; (3) MG6G, one injection of PGF2α, GnRH 4 days later before initiation of the G6G protocol; and (4) MG6GP, an additional PGF2α treatment (24 h after the first) during Ovsynch of the MG6G protocol. Blood samples were collected (subset of 200 cows) at first GnRH and PGF2α of the Ovsynch, and at TAI to measure P4. Ultrasound examinations were performed in a subset of 406 cows to evaluate ovarian response at various times of Ovsynch, and in all cattle to determine pregnancy status at 32 and 60 days after TAI. Extending the interval by 2 days between PGF2α and GnRH during presynchronization increased (P<0.01) ovulatory response to first GnRH of Ovsynch, circulating P4 during Ovsynch, and P/AI at 32 and 60 days after TAI. Adding a second PGF2α treatment before AI increased the proportion of cows with luteal regression (P=0.04), improved P/AI at 60 days after TAI (P=0.05), and reduced pregnancy loss between 30 and 60 days after TAI (P=0.04). In summary, extending the interval from PGF2α to GnRH during presynchronization increased response to first GnRH of Ovsynch and P4 concentrations during Ovsynch, whereas adding a second PGF2α treatment before AI enhanced luteal regression. Both modifications of the G6G protocol improved fertility in lactating dairy cows.     

Effects of pre-synchronization using combinations PGF(2alpha) and (or) GnRH on pregnancy rates of Ovsynch- and Cosynch-treated lactating Holstein cows

In Experiment 1, the effects of two pre-synchronization treatments on synchronized AI pregnancy rates of lactating dairy cattle were compared. Lactating Holstein cows (n=159) received 100 microg of GnRH (im) on day -7 and 25mg of PGF(2alpha) (im) on day 0 and were observed once daily for signs of estrus from day -3 to day 3. Cows detected in standing estrus and those that had lost significant amounts of tail-chalk in the previous 24h were immediately inseminated in a once-daily observation/AI program. Cows not detected in estrus by 72 h after PGF(2alpha) received fixed-time AI (TAI) and a concurrent 100 microg injection of GnRH (im). Cows were randomly assigned by parity and calving date to receive one of the following pre-synchronization treatments: (1) 25mg of PGF(2alpha) (im) on day -35 and day -21 (PGF-PGF) or (2) 100 microg of GnRH (im) on day -14 (GnRH). Fewer (P<0.05) GnRH- (49%, 41/84) than PGF-PGF-pretreated cows (65%, 49/75) were detected in estrus, however, overall pregnancy rates were not affected by pre-synchronization treatment (30 versus 32%, respectively). In Experiment 2, lactating Holstein cows received 100 microg of GnRH (im) on day -7, 25mg of PGF(2alpha) (im) on day 0 and TAI at 60-64 h after PGF(2alpha). Cows were randomized by parity and postpartum interval into pre- and post-synchronization treatments in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Pre-synchronization treatments included: (1) 25mg of PGF(2alpha) (im) on day -35 and on day -21 (PGF-PGF; n=168) or (2) 25mg of PGF(2alpha) (im) on day -21 and 100 microg of GnRH (im) on day -14 (PGF-GnRH; n=180). Within each pre-synchronization treatment, cows were further allocated by parity and postpartum interval to receive as a post-synchronization treatment 100 microg of GnRH (im) at either 48 h (Ovsynch; n=175) or 60-64 h (Cosynch; n=173) after PGF(2alpha). Pregnancy rates at TAI were not affected by pre- (PGF-PGF=26%, 44/168 versus PGF-GnRH=24%, 44/180) or post-synchronization treatments (Ovsynch=29%, 50/175 versus Cosynch=22%, 38/173). However, the numeric shift towards reduced pregnancy rates in Cosynch-treated cows suggests the 12h interval between GnRH and AI may be important to optimize conception rates in GnRH-PGF(2alpha)-based TAI protocols in dairy cattle. In conclusion, each of the pre-synchronization protocols evaluated in present study performed with comparable efficacy. Although the Cosynch protocol facilitates more efficient labor utilization, numeric trends toward reduced conception warrants further investigation.     

Effect of timing of second prostaglandin F2α administration in a 5-day, progesterone-based CO-Synch protocol on AI pregnancy rates in beef cows

The objective was to compare the timed AI pregnancy rate of Angus-cross beef cows synchronized with a 5-d CO-Synch + CIDR (a progesterone-releasing intravaginal insert) protocol and given two doses of PGF_2α (PGF), with the first dose in conjunction with CIDR withdrawal on Day 5, and the second dose given either early or late relative to the first dose. All cows (N = 1782) at 16 locations received 100 μg of GnRH + CIDR on Day 0. Cows received 25 mg of PGF concurrent with removal of the CIDR on Day 5, and were randomly allocated within locations to receive a second PGF either early (N = 881; from 0.5 to 3.9 h) or late (N = 901; from 4.5 to 8.15 h) relative to the first PGF treatment. On Day 8 (72 h after CIDR removal), all cows were inseminated and concurrently given 100 μg of GnRH. Cows were fitted with a pressure-sensitive mount detection device (Kamar) at CIDR removal. Cows were observed twice daily through Day 7 and at the time of AI on Day 8 for estrus and Kamar status (estrus - red, partial and lost Kamar versus no estrus - white Kamar) was recorded. Accounting for location, season, AI sire, cow observed in estrus or not at or before timed AI, and treatment by cows observed in estrus interaction, timed AI pregnancy rates were greater for the late (6.45 ± 0.03 h) than the early (2.25 ± 0.05 h) interval, 57.2 vs. 52.7%, respectively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, cows that received the second PGF late after the first PGF on the day of CIDR removal in a 5 d CO-Synch + CIDR synchronization protocol had significantly higher timed AI pregnancy rates than those receiving the second PGF early after the first PGF.     

Reduction in size of the ovulatory follicle reduces subsequent luteal size and pregnancy rate

We hypothesized that reducing the size of the ovulatory follicle using aspiration and GnRH would reduce the size of the resulting CL, reduce circulating progesterone concentrations, and alter conception rates. Lactating dairy cows (n=52) had synchronized ovulation and AI by treating with GnRH and PGF2alpha as follows: Day -9, GnRH (100 microg); Day -2, PGF2alpha (25 mg); Day 0, GnRH (100 microg); Day 1, AI. Treated cows (aspirated group; n=29) had all follicles > 4 mm in diameter aspirated on Days -5 or -6 in order to start a new follicular wave. Control cows (nonaspirated group: n=23) had no follicle aspiration. The size of follicles and CL were monitored by ultrasonography. The synchronized ovulation rate (ovulation rate to second GnRH injection: 42/52=80.8%) and double ovulation rate of synchronized cows (6/42=14.3%) did not differ (P > 0.05) between groups. Aspiration reduced the size of the ovulatory follicle (P < 0.0001; 11.5 +/- 0.2 vs 14.5 +/- 0.4 mm), and serum estradiol concentrations at second GnRH treatment (P < 0.0002; 2.5 +/- 0.4 vs 5.7 +/- 0.6 pg/mL). The volume of CL was less (P < 0.05) for aspirated than nonaspirated cows on Day 7 (2,862 +/- 228 vs 5,363 +/- 342 mm3) or Day 14 (4,652 +/- 283 vs 6,526 +/- 373 mm3). Similarly, serum progesterone concentrations were less on Day 7 (P < 0.05) and Day 14 (P < 0.10) for aspirated cows. Pregnancy rate per AI for synchronized cows was lower (P < 0.05) for aspirated (3/21=14.3%) than nonaspirated (10/21=47.6%) cows. In conclusion, ovulation of smaller follicles produced lowered fertility possibly because development of smaller CL decreased circulating progesterone concentrations.     

Resynchronization of ovulation and timed insemination in lactating dairy cows, II: assigning protocols according to stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus

Pregnancy rates were compared in lactating dairy cows (n = 1083) assigned to protocols for resynchronization of ovulation based on stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts or anestrus. Cows were detected not pregnant by ultrasonography 30 d after a previous AI (study day 0) and classified as diestrus, metestrus, proestrus, with ovarian cysts or anestrus. Cows in diestrus (January-May) were assigned to either Ovsynch (GnRH day 0, PGF2alpha day 7, GnRH day 9, and timed-AI [TAI] 16 h later; n = 96), or Quicksynch (PGF2alpha day 0, estradiol cypionate [ECP] day 1, AI at detected estrus [AIDE] on day 2, or TAI on day 3; n = 96). Cows in diestrus (June-December) were assigned to either Ovsynch (n = 156) or Modified Quicksynch (PGF2alpha day 0, ECP day 1, AIDE days 2 and 3, and to Ovsynch on day 4 if not detected in estrus; n = 142). Cows in metestrus were assigned either to Ovsynch (n = 68), Heatsynch (GnRH day 0, PGF2alpha day 7, ECP day 8, AIDE day 9, or TAI day 10; n = 62), or GnRH + Ovsynch (GnRH on day 0, followed by Ovsynch on day 8; n = 64). Cows in proestrus, with ovarian cysts, or anestrus were assigned to either Ovsynch (proestrus n = 89, ovarian cysts n = 97, anestrus n = 8) or GnRH + Ovsynch (proestrus n = 87, ovarian cysts n = 109, anestrus n = 9). Pregnancy rate was evaluated 30, 55 and 90 d after resynchronized AI. For cows in diestrus (January-May), pregnancy rates were higher for Ovsynch (35.9, 29.2 and 26.0%) than for Quicksynch (21.7, 16.7 and 15.6%). For cows in diestrus (June-December), pregnancy rates were similar for Ovsynch (34.4, 24.0 and 23.6%) and Modified Quicksynch (27.1, 26.2 and 21.6%). For cows in metestrus, pregnancy rates were higher for GnRH + Ovsynch (33.3, 24.5 and 20.3%) than for Heatsynch (20.3, 12.9 and 9.8%). For cows with ovarian cysts, pregnancy rates were higher for GnRH + Ovsynch (30.3, 26.6 and 22.9%) than for Ovsynch (20.2, 18.5 and 14.7%). Assignment to resynchronization protocols based on the stages of the estrous cycle, or presence of ovarian cysts improved pregnancy rates.