Comparison of the sex and subcellular distributions, catalytic and immunochemical reactivities of hepatic epoxide hydrolases in seven mammalian species

Sex and species differences in hepatic epoxide hydrolase activities towards cis- and trans-stilbene oxide were examined in common laboratory animals, as well as in monkey and man. In general trans-stilbene oxide was found to be a good substrate for epoxide hydrolase activity in cytosolic fractions, whereas the cis isomer was selectively hydrated by the microsomal fraction (with the exception of man, where the cytosol also hydrated this isomer efficiently). The specific cytosolic epoxide hydrolase activity was highest in mouse, followed by hamster and rabbit. Epoxide hydrolase activity in the crude 'mitochondrial' fraction towards trans-stilbene oxide was also highest in mouse and low in all other species examined. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity was highest in monkey, followed by guinea pig, human and rabbit, which all had similar activities. Sex differences were generally small, but where significant, male animals had higher catalytic activities than females of the same species in most cases. Antibodies raised against microsomal epoxide hydrolase purified from rat liver reacted with microsomes from all species investigated, indicating structural conservation of this protein. Antibodies directed towards cytosolic epoxide hydrolase purified from mouse liver reacted only with liver cytosol from mouse and hamster and with the 'mitochondrial' fraction from mouse in immunodiffusion experiments. Immunoblotting also revealed reaction with rat liver cytosol. The cytosolic and 'mitochondrial' epoxide hydrolases in all three mouse strains and in both sexes for each strain were immunochemically identical. The anomalies in human liver epoxide hydrolase activities observed here indicate that no single common laboratory animal is a good model for man with regard to these activities.     

Human microsomal xenobiotic epoxide hydrolase. Complementary DNA sequence, complementary DNA-directed expression in COS-1 cells, and chromosomal localization

A lambda gt11 expression library constructed from human liver mRNA was screened with an antibody against human microsomal xenobiotic epoxide hydrolase. The clone pheh32 contains an insert of 1742 base pairs with an open reading frame coding for a protein of 455 amino acids with a calculated Mr of 52,956. The nucleotide sequence is 77% similar to the previously reported rat xenobiotic epoxide hydrolase cDNA sequence. The deduced amino acid sequence of the human epoxide hydrolase is 80% similar to the previously reported rabbit and 84% similar to the deduced rat protein sequence. The NH2-terminal amino acids deduced from the human xenobiotic epoxide hydrolase cDNA are identical to the published 19 NH2-terminal amino acids of the purified human xenobiotic epoxide hydrolase protein. Northern blot analysis revealed a single mRNA band of 1.8 kilobases. Southern blot analysis indicated that there is only one gene copy/haploid genome. The human xenobiotic epoxide hydrolase gene was assigned to the long arm of human chromosome 1. Several restriction fragment length polymorphisms were observed with the human epoxide hydrolase cDNA. pheh32 was expressed as enzymatically active protein in cultured monkey kidney cells (COS-1).     

Differential response of human and rat epoxide hydrolase to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon exposure: studies using precision-cut tissue slices

The potential of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) to modulate microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity, determined using benzo[a]pyrene 5-oxide as substrate, in human liver, was evaluated and compared to rat liver. Precision-cut liver slices prepared from fresh human liver were incubated with six structurally diverse PAHs, at a range of concentrations, for 24 h. Of the six PAHs studied, benzo[a]pyrene, dibenzo[a,h]anthracene and fluoranthene gave rise to a statistically significant increase in epoxide hydrolase activity, which was accompanied by a concomitant increase in epoxide hydrolase protein levels determined by immunoblotting. The other PAHs studied, namely dibenzo[a,l]pyrene, benzo[b]fluoranthene and 1-methylphenanthrene, influenced neither activity nor enzyme protein levels. When rat slices were incubated under identical conditions, only benzo[a]pyrene and dibenzo[a,h]anthracene elevated epoxide hydrolase activity, which was, once again accompanied by a rise in protein levels. At the mRNA level, however, all six PAHs caused an increase, albeit to different extent. In rat, epoxide hydroxylase activity in lung slices was much lower than in liver slices. In lung slices, epoxide hydrolase activity was elevated following exposure to benzo[a]pyrene and dibenzo[a,l]pyrene and, to a lesser extent, 1-methylphenanthrene; similar observations were made at the protein level. At both activity and protein levels extent of induction was far more pronounced in the lung compared with the liver. It is concluded that epoxide hydrolase activity is an inducible enzyme by PAHs, in both human and rat liver, but induction potential by individual PAHs varies enormously, depending on the nature of the compound involved. Marked tissue differences in the nature of PAHs stimulating activity in rat lung and liver were noted. Although in the rat basal lung epoxide hydrolase activity is much lower than liver, it is more markedly inducible by PAHs.     

Microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases in rhesus monkey liver, and in normal and neoplastic human liver

The cytosolic epoxide hydrolase (EH-LC) was observed in rhesus monkey liver cytosol, and in both normal and neoplastic human liver. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase (EH-LM) was detected not only in the microsomes of normal and neoplastic human liver and normal rhesus monkey liver, but also in the cytosol of these tissues. No apparent differences were observed between the EH-LM in liver cytosol and that in microsomes. No major differences were observed between the levels of EH-LM in the cytosol of normal and that in neoplastic human liver.     

Purification of human liver cytosolic epoxide hydrolase and comparison to the microsomal enzyme

Epoxide hydrolase (EC 3.3.2.3) was purified to electrophoretic homogeneity from human liver cytosol by using hydrolytic activity toward trans-8-ethylstyrene 7,8-oxide (TESO) as an assay. The overall purification was 400-fold. The purified enzyme has an apparent monomeric molecular weight of 58 000, significantly greater than the 50 000 found for human (or rat) liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase or for another TESO-hydrolyzing enzyme also isolated from human liver cytosol. Purified cytosolic TESO hydrolase catalyzes the hydrolysis of cis-8-ethylstyrene 7,8-oxide 10 times more rapidly than does the microsomal enzyme, catalyzes the hydrolysis of TESO and trans-stilbene oxide as rapidly as the microsomal enzyme, but catalyzes the hydrolysis of styrene 7,8-oxide, p-nitrostyrene 7,8-oxide, and naphthalene 1,2-oxide much less effectively than does the microsomal enzyme. Purified cytosolic TESO hydrolase does not hydrolyze benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide, a substrate for the microsomal enzyme. The activities of the purified enzymes can explain the specific activities observed with subcellular fractions. Anti-human liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase did not recognize cytosolic TESO hydrolase in purified form or in cytosol, as judged by double-diffusion immunoprecipitin analysis, precipitation of enzymatic activity, and immunoelectrophoretic techniques. Cytosolic TESO hydrolase and microsomal epoxide hydrolase were also distinguished by peptide mapping. The results provide evidence that physically different forms of epoxide hydrolase exist in different subcellular fractions and can have markedly different substrate specificities.     

Human liver cytosolic epoxide hydrolases

Human liver epoxide hydrolases were characterized by several criteria and a cytosolic cis-stilbene oxide hydrolase (cEHCSO) was purified to apparent homogeneity. Styrene oxide and five phenylmethyloxiranes were tested as substrates for human liver epoxide hydrolases. With microsomes activity was highest with trans-2-methylstyrene oxide, followed by styrene 7,8-oxide, cis-2-methylstyrene oxide, cis-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide, trans-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide and 2,2-dimethylstyrene oxide. With cytosol the same order was obtained for the first three substrates, whereas activity with 2,2-dimethylstyrene oxide was higher than with cis-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide and no hydrolysis occurred with trans-1,2-dimethylstyrene oxide. Generally, activities were lower with cytosol than with microsomes. The isoelectric point for both microsomal styrene 7,8-oxide and cis-stilbene oxide hydrolyzing activity was 7.0, whereas cEHCSO had an isoelectric point of 9.2 and cytosolic trans-stilbene oxide hydrolase (cEHTSO) of 5.7. The cytosolic epoxide hydrolases could be separated by anion-exchange chromatography and gel filtration. The latter technique revealed a higher molecular mass for cEHCSO than for cEHTSO. Both cytosolic epoxide hydrolases showed higher activities at pH 7.4 than at pH 9.0, whereas the opposite was true for microsomal epoxide hydrolase. The effects of ethanol, methanol, tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile, acetone and dimethylsulfoxide on microsomal epoxide hydrolase depended on the substrate tested, whereas both cytosolic enzymes were not at all, or only slightly, affected by these solvents. Effects of different enzyme modulators on microsomal epoxide hydrolase also depended on the substrates used. Trichloropropene oxide and styrene 7,8-oxide strongly inhibited cEHCSO whereas cEHTSO was moderately affected by these compounds. Immunochemical investigations revealed a close relationship between cEHCSO and rat liver microsomal, but not cytosolic, epoxide hydrolase. Interestingly, cEHTSO has no immunological relationship to rat microsomal, nor to rat cytosolic epoxide hydrolase. cEHTSO from human liver differed also from its counterpart in the rat in that it was only moderately affected by tetrahydrofuran, acetonitrile and trichloropropene oxide. Five steps were necessary to purify cEHCSO. The enzyme has a molecular mass (49 kDa) identical to that of rat liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase.     

The regulation of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase in mice

The concentration of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase in untreated and clofibrate-treated mouse liver extracts was estimated by immunoblotting. Clofibrate treatment of mice was found to increase liver cytosolic epoxide hydrolase concentration by two fold, showing that the increase in cytosolic epoxide hydrolase in mouse liver after clofibrate treatment is primarily due to induction. The induced and uninduced cytosolic epoxide hydrolase, and epoxide hydrolase in the cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions were compared and found to be identical or very similar. Cytosolic epoxide hydrolases in kidney and liver were similar in molecular weight and antigenic properties.     

The effects of metyrapone, chalcone epoxide, benzil, clotrimazole and related compounds on the activity of microsomal epoxide hydrolase in situ, in purified form and in reconstituted systems towards different substrates

The influence of metyrapone, chalcone epoxide, benzil and clotrimazole on the activity of microsomal epoxide hydrolase towards styrene oxide, benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide, estroxide and androstene oxide was investigated. The studies were performed using liver microsomes from rats, rabbits, mice and humans; epoxide hydrolase purified from rat liver microsomes to apparent homogeneity; and the purified enzyme incorporated into liposomes composed of egg-yolk phosphatidylcholine or total rat liver microsomal lipids. All four effectors were found to activate the hydrolysis of styrene oxide by epoxide hydrolase in situ in rat liver microsomal membranes, in agreement with earlier findings. Epoxide hydrolase activity towards styrene oxide in liver microsomes from mouse, rabbit and man was also increased by all four effectors. The most striking effect was a 680% activation by clotrimazole in rat liver microsomes. However, none of the effectors activated microsomal epoxide hydrolase more than 50% when benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide, estroxide or androstene oxide was used as substrate. Indeed, clotrimazole was found to inhibit microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity towards estroxide 30-50% and towards androstene oxide 60-90%. The effects of these four compounds were found to be virtually identical in the preparations from rats, rabbits, mice and humans. The effects of metyrapone, chalcone epoxide, benzil and clotrimazole on purified epoxide hydrolase were qualitatively the same as those on epoxide hydrolase in intact microsomes, but much smaller in magnitude. These effects were increased in magnitude only slightly by incorporation of the purified enzyme into liposomes made from egg-yolk phosphatidylcholine. However, when incorporation into liposomes composed of total microsomal lipids was performed, the effects seen were essentially of the same magnitude as with intact microsomes. When the extent of activation was plotted against effector concentration, three different patterns were found with different effectors. Activation of epoxide hydrolase activity towards styrene oxide by clotrimazole was found to be uncompetitive with the substrate and highly structure specific. On the other hand, inhibition of epoxide hydrolase activity towards androstene oxide by clotrimazole was found to be competitive in microsomes. It is concluded that the marked effects of these four modulators on microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity are due to an interaction with the enzyme protein itself, but that the presence of total microsomal phospholipids allows the maximal expression leading to similar degrees of modulation as those observed in intact microsomes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Differential subcellular localization of endogenous and transfected soluble epoxide hydrolase in mammalian cells: evidence for isozyme variants

Endogenous, constitutive soluble epoxide hydrolase in mice 3T3 cells was localized via immunofluorescence microscopy exclusively in peroxisomes, whereas transiently expressed mouse soluble epoxide hydrolase (from clofibrate-treated liver) accumulated only in the cytosol of 3T3 and HeLa cells. When the C-terminal lie of mouse soluble epoxide hydrolase was mutated to generate a prototypic putative type 1 PTS (-SKI to -SKL), the enzyme targeted to peroxisomes. The possibility that soluble epoxide hydrolase-SKI was sorted slowly to peroxiosmes from the cytosol was examined by stably expressing rat soluble epoxide hydrolase-SKI appended to the green fluorescent protein. Green fluorescent protein soluble epoxide hydrolase-SKI was strictly cytosolic, indicating that -SKI was not a temporally inefficient putative type 1 PTS. Import of soluble epoxide hydrolase-SKI into peroxisomes in plant cells revealed that the context of -SKI on soluble epoxide hydrolase was targeting permissible. These results show that the C-terminal -SKI is a non-functional putative type 1 PTS on soluble epoxide hydrolase and suggest the existence of distinct cytosolic and peroxisomal targeting variants of soluble epoxide hydrolase in mouse and rat.     

A new enzyme immunoassay of microsomal rat liver epoxide hydrolase

Antiserum against purified rat liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase was produced in the rabbit. We developed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay which is reliable with regard to its analytical criteria. The concentration of epoxide hydrolase was measured in liver microsomes of control rats and animals treated with F 1379 (250 mg/kg/day) for 5, 7, 14, and 21 days. This hypolipidemic drug was able to induce strong epoxide hydrolase activity and enhance protein concentration. The gradual increase in epoxide hydrolase concentration paralleled the increase of epoxide hydrolase activity, with stabilization occurring after the 14th until the 21st day of treatment.     

Cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolases are immunologically distinguishable from each other in the rat and mouse

Antibodies raised to homogeneous rat liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase were used to distinguish microsomal epoxide hydrolase from epoxide hydrolase of cytosolic origin in mice and rats. Using double diffusion analysis in agarose gels, we show that anti-rat liver microsomal epoxide hydrolase forms a single precipitin line with solubilized microsomes from rat and mouse liver, but no reaction is seen with the corresponding cytosolic fractions. Rat or mouse microsomal epoxide hydrolase activity (using benzo[a]pyrene 4,5-oxide as substrate) can be completely precipitated out of solubilized preparations by the antibody, which is equipotent against rat and mouse microsomal epoxide hydrolase. No precipitation of cytosolic hydrolase activity (using trans-beta-ethyl styrene oxide as substrate) is seen with any concentration of the antibody tested. Thus, in the case of microsomal epoxide hydrolase, extensive immunological cross-reactivity exists between the two species, rat and mouse. In contrast, no cross-reactivity is detectable between cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolase, even when enzymes from the same species are compared. We conclude that microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolase activities represent distinct and immunologically non-cross-reactive protein species.     

Structure and organization of the microsomal xenobiotic epoxide hydrolase gene

The gene for the microsomal xenobiotic rat liver epoxide hydrolase has been isolated and characterized. Clones were obtained from a Wistar Furth Charon 35 genomic library by hybridization with a full-length epoxide hydrolase cDNA. The gene for the xenobiotic epoxide hydrolase is approximately 16 kilobases in length and consists of 9 exons ranging in size from 109 to 420 base pairs and 8 intervening sequences, the largest of which is 3.2 kilobases. S1-nuclease mapping, primer extension studies, and sequence analysis were used to determine the 5' cap site and the size of the first exon (170 base pairs). Regulatory sequences analogous to TATA, CCAAT, and core enhancer sequences were noted in the 5'-flanking region of the gene. The cDNA and gene for epoxide hydrolase displayed nucleotide sequence identity although they were isolated from different rat strains. Also, Southern blot analysis of restricted liver DNA from inbred Fischer 344 and Wistar Furth rat strains, and outbred Sprague-Dawley rats indicated a high degree of structural similarity for the epoxide hydrolase gene within these three strains. Only a single functional epoxide hydrolase gene was identified and no evidence of hybridization to the genes for the microsomal cholesterol epoxide hydrolase or the cytosolic epoxide hydrolase was observed. However, a pseudogene for the microsomal xenobiotic epoxide hydrolase was isolated and characterized from the genomic library.     

Properties of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase purified from the liver of untreated and clofibrate-treated mice. Purification procedure and physiochemical characterization of the pure enzymes

Cytosolic epoxide hydrolase was purified from the liver of untreated and clofibrate-treated male C57Bl/6 mice. The purification procedure involves chromatography on DEAE-cellulose, phenyl-Sepharose and hydroxyapatite, takes two days to perform and results in a 120-fold purification and approximately 35% yield of the enzyme from untreated mice. The purified enzyme is a dimer with a molecular mass of 120 kDa, a Stokes' radius of 4.2 nm, a frictional ratio of 1.0 and an isoelectric point of 5.5. The subunits behave identically upon isoelectric focusing in 8 M urea and only one band with a molecular mass of 60 kDa is seen after sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The form purified from clofibrate-treated mice had very similar properties and was apparently identical to the control form as judged by amino acid analysis and peptide mapping as well. These analyses also demonstrated that the cytosolic enzyme is clearly different from microsomal epoxide hydrolase isolated from rat liver. Furthermore, Ouchterlony immunodiffusion using antibodies raised in rabbits towards the control form of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase revealed identity between the two forms of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase, but no reaction with the microsomal epoxide hydrolase was observed. These findings indicate large structural differences between the cytosolic and microsomal forms of epoxide hydrolase in the liver.     

Purification of hepoxilin epoxide hydrolase from rat liver

Hepoxilin epoxide hydrolase activity was demonstrated in rat liver cytosol using as substrate [1-14C] hepoxilin A3, a recently described hydroxy epoxide derivative of arachidonic acid. The enzyme was isolated and purified to apparent homogeneity using conventional chromatographic procedures resulting in 41-fold purification. The protein eluted during isoelectric focusing at a pI in the 5.3-5.4 range. The specific activity of the purified protein was 1.2 ng/microgram protein/20 min at 37 degrees C. On sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, under denaturing conditions, a molecular mass value of 53 kDa was observed. Using native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, enzyme activity corresponded to the main protein band. The purified protein used hepoxilin A3 as preferred substrate converting it to trioxilin A3. The enzyme was marginally active toward other epoxides such as leukotriene A4 and styrene oxide. The Mr, pI, and substrate specificity of the hepoxilin epoxide hydrolase indicate that this enzyme is different from the recently reported leukotriene A4 hydrolase from human erythrocytes and rat and human neutrophils and constitutes a hitherto undescribed form of epoxide hydrolase with specificity toward hepoxilin A3. Tissue screening for enzyme activity revealed that this enzyme is ubiquitous in the rat.     

Properties of enzymes hydrating epoxides in human epidermis and liver

• 1.1. Cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolyzing enzymes of human skin and liver were compared and found to be different.
• 2.2. Epidermal and hepatic cytosolic epoxide hydrolases were different in terms of substrate selectivity, pI, inhibitor sensitivity and affinity Chromatographic properties.
• 3.3. Microsomal epoxide hydrolases had the same pIs but different substrate selectivities.
• 4.4. Cytosolic epoxide hydrolase from adults had higher specific activity than that from neonates or cultured epidermis, but lower activity than adult hepatic enzymes.
• 5.5. The sizes of cytosolic epoxide hydrolase from epidermis and liver were similar and lower than that from cultured fibroblasts.
• 6.6. Cytosolic epoxide hydrolase from all sources shared similar antigenic determinants.

     

Leukotriene A4. Enzymatic conversion into 5,6-dihydroxy-7,9,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid by mouse liver cytosolic epoxide hydrolase

Mouse liver homogenates transformed leukotriene A4 into a 5,6-dihydroxy-7,9,11,14-eicosatetraenoic acid. This novel enzymatic metabolite of leukotriene A4 was characterized by physical means including ultraviolet spectroscopy, high performance liquid chromatography, and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. After subcellular fractionation, the enzymatic activity was mostly recovered in the 105,000 X g supernatant and 20,000 X g pellet. Heat treatment (80 degrees C, 10 min) or digestion with a proteolytic enzyme abolished the enzymatic activity in the high speed supernatant. A purified cytosolic epoxide hydrolase from mouse liver also transformed leukotriene A4 into a 5,6-dihydroxyeicosatetraenoic acid with the same physico-chemical characteristics as the compound formed in crude cytosol, but not into leukotriene B4, a compound previously reported to be formed in liver cytosol (Haeggstr?m, J., R?dmark, O., and Fitzpatrick, F.A. (1985) Biochim. Biophys. Acta 835, 378-384). These findings suggest a role for leukotriene A4 as an endogenous substrate for cytosolic epoxide hydrolase, an enzyme earlier characterized by xenobiotic substrates. Furthermore, they indicate that leukotriene A4 hydrolase in liver cytosol is a distinct enzyme, separate from previously described forms of epoxide hydrolases in liver.     

Microsomal and cytosolic epoxide hydrolases, the peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation system and catalase. Activities, distribution and induction in rat liver parenchymal and non-parenchymal cells

A number of structurally unrelated hypolipidaemic agents and certain phthalate-ester plasticizers induce hepatomegaly and proliferation of peroxisomes in rodent liver, but there is relatively limited data regarding the specific effects of these drugs on liver non-parenchymal cells. In the present study, liver parenchymal, Kupffer and endothelial cells from untreated and fenofibrate-fed rats were isolated and the activities of two enzymes associated with peroxisomes (catalase and the peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation system) as well as cytosolic and microsomal epoxide hydrolase were measured. Microsomal epoxide hydrolase, cytosolic epoxide hydrolase and catalase activities were 7-12-fold higher in parenchymal cells than in Kupffer or endothelial cells from untreated rats; the peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation activity was only detected in parenchymal cells. Fenofibrate increased catalase, cytosolic epoxide hydrolase and peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation activities in parenchymal cells by about 1.5-, 3.5- and 20-fold, respectively. The induction of catalase (2-3-fold) and cytosolic epoxide hydrolase (3-5-fold) was also observed in Kupffer and endothelial cells; furthermore, a low peroxisomal fatty acid beta-oxidation activity was detected in endothelial cells. Morphological examination by electron microscopy showed that peroxisomes were confined to liver parenchymal cells in untreated animals, but could also be observed in endothelial cells after administration of fenofibrate.     

Prediction of isoprene diepoxide levels in vivo in mouse, rat and man using enzyme kinetic data in vitro and physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modelling.

The present study was designed to explain the differences in isoprene toxicity between mouse and rat based on the liver concentrations of the assumed toxic metabolite isoprene diepoxide. In addition, extrapolation to the human situation was attempted. For this purpose, enzyme kinetic parameters K(m) and V(max) were determined in vitro in mouse, rat and human liver microsomes/cytosol for the cytochrome P450-mediated formation of isoprene mono- and diepoxides, epoxide hydrolase mediated hydrolysis of isoprene mono- and diepoxides, and the glutathione S-transferases mediated conjugation of isoprene monoepoxides. Subsequently, the kinetic parameters were incorporated into a physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model, and species differences regarding isoprene diepoxide levels were forecasted. Almost similar isoprene diepoxide liver and lung concentrations were predicted in mouse and rat, while predicted levels in humans were about 20-fold lower. However, when interindividual variation in enzyme activity was introduced in the human model, the levels of isoprene diepoxide changed considerably. It was forecasted that in individuals having both an extensive oxidation by cytochrome P450 and a low detoxification by epoxide hydrolase, isoprene diepoxide concentrations in the liver increased to similar concentrations as predicted for the mouse. However, the interpretation of the latter finding for human risk assessment is ambiguous since species differences between mouse and rat regarding isoprene toxicity could not be explained by the predicted isoprene diepoxide concentrations. We assume that other metabolites than isoprene diepoxide or different carcinogenic response might play a key role in determining the extent of isoprene toxicity. In order to confirm this, in vivo experiments are required in which isoprene epoxide concentrations will be established in rats and mice.     

Leukotriene A4 hydrolase in human leukocytes. Purification and properties

Leukotriene A4 hydrolase, a soluble enzyme catalyzing hydrolysis of the allylic epoxide leukotriene A4 to the dihydroxy acid leukotriene B4, was purified to apparent homogeneity from human leukocytes. The enzymatic reaction obeyed Michaelis-Menten saturation kinetics with respect to varying concentrations of leukotriene A4. An apparent KM value ranging between 20 and 30 microM was deduced from Eadie-Hofstee plots. Physical properties including molecular weight (68,000-70,000), amino acid composition, and aminoterminal sequence were determined. It was indicated that leukotriene A4 hydrolase is a monomeric protein, distinct from previously described epoxide hydrolases in liver.     

Leukotriene A4 hydrolase: analysis of some human tissues by radioimmunoassay

Leukotriene A4 hydrolase was quantitated by radioimmunoassay, in extracts from eight human tissues. The enzyme was detectable in all tissues, with the highest level (2.6 mg per g soluble protein) in leukocytes, followed by lung and liver. The polyclonal antiserum did not cross-react with cytosolic epoxide hydrolase purified from mouse or human liver. When incubated with leukotriene A4, formation of leukotriene B4 was evident in all tissues. Furthermore, enzymatic formation of (5S,6R)-dihydroxy-7,9-trans-11,14-cis-eicosatetraenoic acid from leukotriene A4, was found in extracts from liver, kidney and intestines.