Coordinated regulation of platelet actin filament barbed ends by gelsolin and capping protein

Exposure of cryptic actin filament fast growing ends (barbed ends) initiates actin polymerization in stimulated human and mouse platelets. Gelsolin amplifies platelet actin assembly by severing F-actin and increasing the number of barbed ends. Actin filaments in stimulated platelets from transgenic gelsolin-null mice elongate their actin without severing. F-actin barbed end capping activity persists in human platelet extracts, depleted of gelsolin, and the heterodimeric capping protein (CP) accounts for this residual activity. 35% of the approximately 5 microM CP is associated with the insoluble actin cytoskeleton of the resting platelet. Since resting platelets have an F- actin barbed end concentration of approximately 0.5 microM, sufficient CP is bound to cap these ends. CP is released from OG-permeabilized platelets by treatment with phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate or through activation of the thrombin receptor. However, the fraction of CP bound to the actin cytoskeleton of thrombin-stimulated mouse and human platelets increases rapidly to approximately 60% within 30 s. In resting platelets from transgenic mice lacking gelsolin, which have 33% more F-actin than gelsolin-positive cells, there is a corresponding increase in the amount of CP associated with the resting cytoskeleton but no change with stimulation. These findings demonstrate an interaction between the two major F-actin barbed end capping proteins of the platelet: gelsolin-dependent severing produces barbed ends that are capped by CP. Phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate release of gelsolin and CP from platelet cytoskeleton provides a mechanism for mediating barbed end exposure. After actin assembly, CP reassociates with the new actin cytoskeleton.     

Mechanisms of actin rearrangements mediating platelet activation.

The detergent-insoluble cytoskeleton of the resting human blood platelet contains approximately 2,000 actin filaments approximately 1 micron in length crosslinked at high angles by actin-binding protein and which bind to a spectrin-rich submembrane lamina (Fox, J., J. Boyles, M. Berndt, P. Steffen, and L. Anderson. 1988. J. Cell Biol. 106:1525-1538; Hartwig, J., and M. DeSisto. 1991. J. Cell Biol. 112:407-425). Activation of the platelets by contact with glass results within 30 s in a doubling of the polymerized actin content of the cytoskeleton and the appearance of two distinct new actin structures: bundles of long filaments within filopodia that end at the filopodial tips (filopodial bundles) and a circumferential zone of orthogonally arrayed short filaments within lamellipodia (lamellipodial network). Neither of these structures appears in cells exposed to glass with cytochalasin B present; instead the cytoskeletons have numerous 0.1-0.3-microns-long actin filament fragments attached to the membrane lamina. With the same time course as the glass-induced morphological changes, cytochalasin-sensitive actin nucleating activity, initially low in cytoskeletons of resting platelets, increases 10-fold in cytoskeletons of thrombin-activated platelets. This activity decays with a time course consistent with depolymerization of 0.1-0.3-microns-long actin filaments, and phalloidin inhibits this decay. Cytochalasin-insensitive and calcium-dependent nucleation activity also increases markedly in platelet extracts after thrombin activation of the cells. Prevention of the rise in cytosolic Ca2+ normally associated with platelet activation with the permeant Ca2+ chelator, Quin-2, inhibits formation of lamellipodial networks but not filopodial bundles after glass contact and reduces the cytochalasin B-sensitive nucleation activity by 60% after thrombin treatment. The filopodial bundles, however, are abnormal in that they do not end at the filopodial tips but form loops and return to the cell body. Addition of calcium to chelated cells restores lamellipodial networks, and calcium plus A23187 results in cytoskeletons with highly fragmented actin filaments within seconds. Immunogold labeling with antibodies against gelsolin reveals gelsolin molecules at the ends of filaments attached to the submembrane lamina of resting cytoskeletons and at the ends of some filaments in the lamellipodial networks and filopodial bundles of activated cytoskeletons. Addition of monomeric actin to myosin subfragment 1-labeled activated cytoskeletons leads to new (undecorated) filament growth off the ends of filaments in the filopodial bundles and the lamellipodial network. The simplest explanation for these findings is that gelsolin caps the barbed ends of the filaments in the resting platelet. Uncapping some of these filaments after activation leads to filopodial bundles.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Tropomodulin caps the pointed ends of actin filaments

Many proteins have been shown to cap the fast growing (barbed) ends of actin filaments, but none have been shown to block elongation and depolymerization at the slow growing (pointed) filament ends. Tropomodulin is a tropomyosin-binding protein originally isolated from red blood cells that has been localized by immunofluorescence staining to a site at or near the pointed ends of skeletal muscle thin filaments (Fowler, V. M., M. A., Sussman, P. G. Miller, B. E. Flucher, and M. P. Daniels. 1993. J. Cell Biol. 120: 411-420). Our experiments demonstrate that tropomodulin in conjunction with tropomyosin is a pointed end capping protein: it completely blocks both elongation and depolymerization at the pointed ends of tropomyosin-containing actin filaments in concentrations stoichiometric to the concentration of filament ends (Kd < or = 1 nM). In the absence of tropomyosin, tropomodulin acts as a "leaky" cap, partially inhibiting elongation and depolymerization at the pointed filament ends (Kd for inhibition of elongation = 0.1-0.4 microM). Thus, tropomodulin can bind directly to actin at the pointed filament end. Tropomodulin also doubles the critical concentration at the pointed ends of pure actin filaments without affecting either the rate of extent of polymerization at the barbed filament ends, indicating that tropomodulin does not sequester actin monomers. Our experiments provide direct biochemical evidence that tropomodulin binds to both the terminal tropomyosin and actin molecules at the pointed filament end, and is the long sought-after pointed end capping protein. We propose that tropomodulin plays a role in maintaining the narrow length distributions of the stable, tropomyosin-containing actin filaments in striated muscle and in red blood cells.     

Rate constant for capping of the barbed ends of actin filaments by the gelsolin-actin complex

The rate of capping of actin filaments by the gelsolin-actin complex was measured by inhibition of elongation of the barbed ends of actin filaments. Polymeric actin (0.1-1.0 microM) was added to 0.5 microM monomeric actin and various concentrations of the gelsolin-actin complex (0.08-2.4 nM) to induce nucleated polymerization. As under the experimental conditions (2 mM MgCl2, 100 mM KCl, 37 degrees C, actin monomer concentration less than or equal to 0.5 microM) actin filaments treadmilled, filaments elongated only at the barbed ends and the gelsolin-actin complex did not nucleate actin filaments to polymerize towards the pointed ends. The rate of nucleated actin polymerization in the presence of the gelsolin-actin complex was quantitatively analyzed. The rate constant for capping of the barbed ends of actin filaments by the gelsolin-actin complex was found to be about 10(7) M-1 s-1.     

Nucleated polymerization of actin from the membrane-associated ends of microvillar filaments in the intestinal brush border

We examined the nucleated polymerization of actin from the two ends of filaments that comprise the microvillus (MV) core in intestinal epithelial cells by electron microscopy. Three different in vitro preparations were used to nucleate the polymerization of muscle G- actin: (a) MV core fragments containing "barbed" and "pointed" filament ends exposed by shear during isolation, (b) isolated, membrane-intact brush borders, and (c) brush borders demembranated with Triton-X 100. It has been demonstrated that MV core fragments nucleate filament growth from both ends with a strong bias for one end. Here we identify the barbed end of the core fragment as the fast growing end by decoration with myosin subfragment one. Both cytochalasin B (CB) and Acanthamoeba capping protein block filament growth from the barbed but not the pointed end of MV core fragments. To examine actin assembly from the naturally occurring, membrane-associated ends of MV core filaments, isolated membrane-intact brush borders were used to nucleate the polymerization of G-actin. Addition of salt (75 mM KCl, 1 mM MgSO4) to brush borders preincubated briefly at low ionic strength with G- actin induced the formation of 0.2-0.4 micron "growth zones" at the tips of microvilli. The dense plaque at the tip of the MV core remains associated with the membrane and the presumed growing ends of the filaments. We also observed filament growth from the pointed ends of core filaments in the terminal web. We did not observe filament growth at the membrane-associated ends of core filaments when the latter were in the presence of 2 microM CB or if the low ionic strength incubation step was omitted. Addition of G-actin to demembranated brush borders, which retain the dense plaque on their MV tips, resulted in filament growth from both ends of the MV core. Again, 2 microM CB blocked filament growth from only the barbed (tip) end of the core. The dense plaque remained associated with the tip-end of the core in the presence of CB but usually was dislodged in control preparations where nucleated polymerization from the tip-end of the core occurred. Our results support the notion that microvillar assembly and changes in microvillar length could occur by actin monomer addition/loss at the barbed, membrane-associated ends of MV core filaments.     

Actin filament barbed end elongation with nonmuscle MgATP-actin and MgADP-actin in the presence of profilin

We have quantitated the in vitro interactions of profilin and the profilin-actin complex (PA) with the actin filament barbed end using profilin and nonmuscle beta,gamma-actin prepared from bovine spleen. Actin filament barbed end elongation was initiated from spectrin seeds in the presence of varying profilin concentrations and followed by light scattering. We find that profilin inhibits actin polymerization and that this effect is much more pronounced for beta,gamma-actin than for alpha-skeletal muscle actin. Profilin binds to beta,gamma-actin filament barbed ends with an equilibrium constant of 20 microM, decreases the filament elongation rate by blocking addition of actin monomers, and increases the dissociation rate of actin monomers from the filament end. PA containing bound MgADP supports elongation of the actin filament barbed end, indicating that ATP hydrolysis is not necessary for PA elongation of filaments. Initial analysis of the energetics for these reactions suggested an apparent greater negative free energy change for actin filament elongation from PA than elongation from monomeric actin. However, we calculate that the free energy changes for the two elongation pathways are equal if the profilin-induced weakening of nucleotide binding to actin is taken into consideration.     

Type Ialpha phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase mediates Rac-dependent actin assembly

Action polymerization is essential for a variety of cellular processes including movement, cell division and shape change. The induction of actin polymerization requires the generation of free actin filament barbed ends, which results from the severing or uncapping of pre-existing actin filaments [1] [2], or de novo nucleation, initiated by the Arp2/3 complex [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. Although little is known about the signaling pathways that regulate actin assembly, small GTPases of the Rho family appear to be necessary [8] [9] [10] [11]. In thrombin-stimulated platelets, the Rho family GTPase Rac1 induces actin polymerization by stimulating the uncapping of actin filament barbed ends [2]. The mechanism by which Rac regulates uncapping is unclear, however. We previously demonstrated that Rac interacts with a type I phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate 5-kinase (PIP 5-kinase) in a GTP-independent manner [12] [13]. Because PIP 5-kinases synthesize phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate (PI(4,5)P(2)), a lipid that dissociates capping proteins from the barbed ends of actin filaments [14] [15] [16], they are good candidates for mediating the effects of Rac on actin assembly. Here, we have identified the Rac-associated PIP 5-kinase as the PIP 5-kinase isoforms alpha and beta. When added to permeabilized platelets, PIP 5-kinase alpha induced actin filament uncapping and assembly. In contrast, a kinase-inactive PIP 5-kinase alpha mutant failed to induce actin assembly and blocked assembly stimulated by thrombin or Rac. Furthermore, thrombin- or Rac-induced actin polymerization was inhibited by a point mutation in the carboxyl terminus of Rac that disrupts PIP 5-kinase binding. These results demonstrate that PIP 5-kinase alpha is a critical mediator of thrombin- and Rac-dependent actin assembly.     

Quantitative analysis of the effect of Acanthamoeba profilin on actin filament nucleation and elongation

The current view of the mechanism of action of Acanthamoeba profilin is that it binds to actin monomers, forming a complex that cannot polymerize [Tobacman, L. S., & Korn, E. D. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 4166-4170; Tseng, P., & Pollard, T. D. (1982) J. Cell Biol. 94, 213-218; Tobacman, L. S., Brenner, S. L., & Korn, E. D. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 8806-8812]. This simple model fails to predict two new experimental observations made with Acanthamoeba actin in 50 mM KC1, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA. First, Acanthamoeba profilin inhibits elongation of actin filaments far more at the pointed end than at the barbed end. According, to the simple model, the Kd for the profilin-actin complex is less than 5 microM on the basis of observations at the pointed end and greater than 50 microM for the barbed end. Second, profilin inhibits nucleation more strongly than elongation. According to the simple model, the Kd for the profilin-actin complex is 60-140 microM on the basis of two assays of elongation but 2-10 microM on the basis of polymerization kinetics that reflect nucleation. These new findings can be explained by a new and more complex model for the mechanism of action that is related to a proposal of Tilney and co-workers [Tilney, L. G., Bonder, E. M., Coluccio, L. M., & Mooseker, M. S. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 97, 113-124]. In this model, profilin can bind both to actin monomers with a Kd of about 5 microM and to the barbed end of actin filaments with a Kd of about 50-100 microM. An actin monomer bound to profilin cannot participate in nucleation or add to the pointed end of an actin filament. It can add to the barbed end of a filament. When profilin is bound to the barbed end of a filament, actin monomers cannot bind to that end, but the terminal actin protomer can dissociate at the usual rate. This model includes two different Kd's--one for profilin bound to actin monomers and one for profilin bound to an actin molecule at the barbed end of a filament. The affinity for the end of the filament is lower by a factor of 10 than the affinity for the monomer, presumably due to the difference in the conformation of the two forms of actin or to steric constraints at the end of the filament.     

Rate of treadmilling of actin filaments in vitro

Actin filaments capped at the barbed ends were formed by polymerizing monomeric actin onto a gelsolin-actin complex. The rate of depolymerization and polymerization of the pointed ends was determined by diluting gelsolin-capped actin filaments into various concentrations of monomeric actin. Under the conditions of the experiments (100 mM-KCl, 2 mM-MgCl2 at 37 degrees C) the rate constant of dissociation of subunits both from a shortening and a lengthening filament was found to be 0.21 s-1. As the rate of dissociation of subunits from the slow pointed end determines the rate of treadmilling, it is concluded that actin filaments treadmill with a rate of about 2 micron/h.     

Kinetics of the interaction of a 41-kilodalton macrophage capping protein with actin: promotion of nucleation during prolongation of the lag period

A 41-kilodalton macrophage capping protein (MCP) has been isolated which is capable of forming complexes with actin monomers in addition to capping the barbed ends of actin filaments (Southwick & DiNubile, 1986). The protein is calcium activated in a fully reversible manner. Using kinetic assays, we determined a capping constant, defined here as a modified Kd, of 1 nM and a Kd of 3-4 microM for MCP-actin monomer complex formation. MCP weakly nucleates actin polymerization: more than 0.5 microM MCP is necessary to shorten the lag period, and 1 microM MCP at an actin/MCP ratio of 10 reduces the average length of actin filaments to about 200 molecules per filament. We determined that the actin nucleus that survives MCP inactivation contains a minimum number of five actin molecules. These experiments also make a point with respect to the interpretation of the prolongation of the lag period. We directly demonstrate that in the presence of an actin binding protein a prolongation of the lag period can be associated with increased nucleation, contrary to the usual interpretation in the literature that it indicates no or decreased nucleation by the actin binding protein.     

Filament assembly from profilin-actin

Profilin plays a major role in the assembly of actin filament at the barbed ends. The thermodynamic and kinetic parameters for barbed end assembly from profilin-actin have been measured turbidimetrically. Filament growth from profilin-actin requires MgATP to be bound to actin. No assembly is observed from profilin-CaATP-actin. The rate constant for association of profilin-actin to barbed ends is 30% lower than that of actin, and the critical concentration for F-actin assembly from profilin-actin units is 0.3 microM under physiological ionic conditions. Barbed ends grow from profilin-actin with an ADP-Pi cap. Profilin does not cap the barbed ends and is not detectably incorporated into filaments. The EDC-cross-linked profilin-actin complex (PAcov) both copolymerizes with F-actin and undergoes spontaneous self-assembly, following a nucleation-growth process characterized by a critical concentration of 0.2 microM under physiological conditions. The PAcov polymer is a helical filament that displays the same diffraction pattern as F-actin, with layer lines at 6 and 36 nm. The PAcov filaments bound phalloidin with the same kinetics as F-actin, bound myosin subfragment-1, and supported actin-activated ATPase of myosin subfragment-1, but they did not translocate in vitro along myosin-coated glass surfaces. These results are discussed in light of the current models of actin structure.     

Regulation of actin dynamics in rapidly moving cells: a quantitative analysis

We develop a mathematical model that describes key details of actin dynamics in protrusion associated with cell motility. The model is based on the dendritic-nucleation hypothesis for lamellipodial protrusion in nonmuscle cells such as keratocytes. We consider a set of partial differential equations for diffusion and reactions of sequestered actin complexes, nucleation, and growth by polymerization of barbed ends of actin filaments, as well as capping and depolymerization of the filaments. The mechanical aspect of protrusion is based on an elastic polymerization ratchet mechanism. An output of the model is a relationship between the protrusion velocity and the number of filament barbed ends pushing the membrane. Significantly, this relationship has a local maximum: too many barbed ends deplete the available monomer pool, too few are insufficient to generate protrusive force, so motility is stalled at either extreme. Our results suggest that to achieve rapid motility, some tuning of parameters affecting actin dynamics must be operating in the cell.     

Cytochalasin B slows but does not prevent monomer addition at the barbed end of the actin filament

We used Limulus sperm acrosomal actin bundles to examine the effect of 2 microM cytochalasin B (CB) on elongation from both the barbed and pointed ends of the actin filament. In this paper we report that 2 microM CB does not prevent monomer addition onto the barbed ends of the acrosomal actin filaments. Barbed end assembly occurred over a range of actin monomer concentrations (0.2-6 microM) in solutions containing 75 mM KCl, 5 mM MgCl2, 10 mM Imidazole, pH 7.2, and 2 microM CB. However, the elongation rates were reduced such that the rates at the barbed end were approximately the same as those at the pointed end. The association and dissociation rate constants were 8- to 10-fold smaller at the barbed end in the presence of CB along with an accompanying twofold increase in critical concentration at that end. Over the time course of experimentation there was little evidence for potentiation by CB of the nucleation step of assembly. CB did not sever actin filaments; instead its presence increased the susceptibility of actin filaments to breakage from the gentle shear forces incurred during sample preparation. Under these experimental conditions, the assembly rate constants and critical concentration at the pointed end were the same in both the presence and the absence of CB.     

Direct measurement of actin polymerization rate constants by electron microscopy of actin filaments nucleated by isolated microvillus cores

We used actin filament bundles isolated from intestinal brush-border microvilli to nucleate the polymerization of pure muscle actin monomers into filaments. Growth rates were determined by electron microscopy by measuring the change in the length of the filaments as a function of time. The linear dependence of the growth rates on the actin monomer concentration provided the rate constants for monomer association and dissociation at the two ends of the growing filament. The rapidly growing ("barbed") end has higher association and dissociation rate constants than the slowly growing ("pointed") end. The values of these rate constants differ in 20 mM KCl compared with 75 mM KCl, 5 mM MgSO4. 2 microM cytochalasin B blocks growth entirely at the barbed end, apparently by reducing both association and dissociation rate constants to near zero, but inhibits growth at the pointed end to only a small extent.     

Ena/VASP proteins capture actin filament barbed ends

Ena/VASP (vasodialator-stimulated protein) proteins regulate many actin-dependent events, including formation of protrusive structures, fibroblast migration, neurite extension, cell-cell adhesion, and Listeria pathogenesis. In vitro, Ena/VASP activities on actin are complex and varied. They promote actin assembly, protect filaments from cappers, bundle filaments, and inhibit filament branching. To determine the mechanisms by which Ena/VASP proteins regulate actin dynamics at barbed ends, we monitored individual actin filaments growing in the presence of VASP and profilin using total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy. Filament growth was unchanged by VASP, but filaments grew faster in profilin-actin and VASP than with profilin-actin alone. Actin filaments were captured directly by VASP-coated surfaces via interactions with growing barbed ends. End-attached filaments transiently paused but resumed growth after becoming bound to the surface via a filament side attachment. Thus, Ena/VASP proteins promote actin assembly by interacting directly with actin filament barbed ends, recruiting profilin-actin, and blocking capping.     

Gelsolin as a calcium-regulated actin filament-capping protein.

Various concentrations of gelsolin (25-100 nM) were added to 2 microM polymerized actin. The concentrations of free calcium were adjusted to 0.05-1.5 microM by EGTA/Ca2+ buffer. Following addition of gelsolin actin depolymerization was observed that was caused by dissociation of actin subunits from the pointed ends of treadmilling actin filaments and inhibition by gelsolin of polymerization at barbed ends. The time course of depolymerization revealed an initial lag phase that was followed by slow decrease of the concentration of polymeric actin to reach the final steady state polymer and monomer concentration. The initial lag phase was pronounced at low free calcium and low gelsolin concentrations. On the basis of quantitative analysis the kinetics of depolymerization could be interpreted as capping, i.e. binding of gelsolin to the barbed ends of actin filaments and subsequent inhibition of polymerization, rather than severing. The main argument for this conclusion was that even gelsolin concentrations (100 nM) that exceed the concentration of filament ends ( approximately 2 nM), cause the filaments to depolymerize at a rate that is similar to the rate of depolymerization of the concentration of pointed ends existing before addition of gelsolin. The rate of capping is directly proportional to the free calcium concentration. These experiments demonstrate that at micromolar and submicromolar free calcium concentrations gelsolin acts as a calcium-regulated capping protein but not as an actin filament severing protein, and that the calcium binding sites of gelsolin which regulate the various functions of gelsolin (capping, severing and monomer binding), differ in their calcium affinity.     

ADP-ribosylated actin caps the barbed ends of actin filaments

The mode of action on actin polymerization of skeletal muscle actin ADP-ribosylated on arginine 177 by perfringens iota toxin was investigated. ADP-ribosylated actin decreased the rate of nucleated actin polymerization at substoichiometric ratios of ADP-ribosylated actin to monomeric actin. ADP-ribosylated actin did not tend to copolymerize with actin. Actin filaments were depolymerized by the addition of ADP-ribosylated actin. The maximal monomer concentration reached by addition of ADP-ribosylated actin was similar to the critical concentration of the pointed ends of actin filaments. ADP-ribosylated actin had no effect on the rate of polymerization of gelsolin-capped actin filaments which polymerize at the pointed ends. The results suggest that ADP-ribosylated actin acts as a capping protein which binds to the barbed ends of actin filaments to inhibit polymerization. Based on an analysis of the depolymerizing effect of ADP-ribosylated actin, the equilibrium constant for binding of ADP-ribosylated actin to the barbed ends of actin filaments was determined to be about 10(8) M-1. As actin is ADP-ribosylated by perfringens iota toxin and by botulinum C2 toxin, it appears that conversion of actin into a capping protein by ADP-ribosylation is a pathophysiological reaction catalyzed by bacterial toxins which ultimately leads to inhibition of actin assembly.     

Cdc42-induced actin filaments are protected from capping protein.

Each actin filament has a pointed and a barbed end, however, filament elongation occurs primarily at the barbed end. Capping proteins, by binding to the barbed end, can terminate this elongation. The rate of capping depends on the concentration of capping protein [1], and thus, if capping terminates elongation, the length of filaments should vary inversely with the concentration of capping protein. In cell extracts, such as those derived from neutrophils, new actin filaments can be nucleated by addition of GTPgammaS-activated Cdc42 (a small GTPase of the Rho family). To determine whether elongation of these filaments is terminated by capping, we manipulated the concentration of capping protein, the major calcium-independent capping protein in neutrophils, and observed the effects on filament lengths. Depletion of 70% of the capping protein from extracts increased the mean length of filaments elongated from spectrin-actin seeds (very short actin filaments with free barbed ends) but did not increase the mean length of filaments induced by Cdc42. Furthermore, doubling the concentration of capping protein in cell extracts by adding pure capping protein did not decrease the mean length of filaments induced by Cdc42. These results suggest that the barbed ends of Cdc42-induced filaments are protected from capping by capping protein.     

Actin-based movement of Listeria monocytogenes: actin assembly results from the local maintenance of uncapped filament barbed ends at the bacterium surface

The thermodynamic basis for actin-based motility of Listeria monocytogenes has been investigated using cytoplasmic extracts of Xenopus eggs, initially developed by Theriot et al. (Theriot, J. A., J. Rosenblatt, D. A. Portnoy, P. J. Goldschmidt-Clermont, and T. J. Mitchison. 1994. Cell. 76:505-517) as an in vitro cell-free system. A large proportion (75%) of actin was found unpolymerized in the extracts. The amount of unassembled actin (12 microM) is accounted for by the sequestering functions of T beta 4Xen (20 microM) and profilin (5 microM), the barbed ends being capped. Movement of Listeria was not abolished by depletion of over 99% of the endogenous profilin. The proline-rich sequences of ActA are unlikely to be the target of profilin. All data support the view that actin assembly at the rear of Listeria results from a local shift in steady state due to a factor, keeping filaments uncapped, bound to the surface of the bacterium, while barbed ends are capped in the bulk cytoplasm. Movement is controlled by the energetic difference (i.e., the difference in critical concentration) between the two ends of the filaments, hence a constant ATP supply and the presence of barbed end capped F-actin in the medium are required to buffer free G-actin at a high concentration. The role of membrane components is demonstrated by the facts that: (a) Listeria movement can be reconstituted in the resuspended pellets of high speed-centrifuged extracts that are enriched in membranes; (b) Actin-based motility of endogenous vesicles, exhibiting the same rocketing movement as Listeria, can be observed in the extracts.     

Interaction of plasma gelsolin with G-actin and F-actin in the presence and absence of calcium ions

Plasma gelsolin formed a very tight 1:2 complex with G-actin in the presence of Ca2+, but no interaction between gelsolin and G-actin was detected in the presence of excess EGTA. However, the 1:2 complex dissociated into a 1:1 gelsolin:actin complex and monomeric actin when excess EGTA was added. Plasma gelsolin bound tightly to the barbed ends of actin filaments and also severed filaments in the presence of Ca2+ and bound weakly to the filament barbed end in the presence of EGTA. The 1:2 gelsolin-actin complex bound to the barbed ends of filaments but did not sever them. By blocking the barbed end of filaments with plasma gelsolin, we determined the critical concentration at the pointed end in 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.2 mM ATP to be 4 microM. The dissociation rate constant for ADP-G-actin from the pointed end was estimated to be about 0.4 s-1 and the association rate constant to be about 5 X 10(4) M-1 s-1. Finally, we obtained evidence that plasma gelsolin accelerates but does not bypass the nucleation step and, therefore, that the concentration of gelsolin does not directly determine the concentration of filaments polymerized in its presence. Thus, gelsolin-capped filaments may not provide an absolutely reliable method for determining the rate constant for the association of ATP-G-actin at the pointed ends of filaments, but a reasonable estimate would be 1 X 10(5) M-1 s-1 in 1 mM MgCl2 and 0.2 mM ATP.