Deformability in the cleavage site of primary microRNA is not sensed by the double‐stranded RNA binding domains in the microprocessor component DGCR8

The prevalence of double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) in eukaryotic cells has only recently been appreciated. Of interest here, RNA silencing begins with dsRNA substrates that are bound by the dsRNA‐binding domains (dsRBDs) of their processing proteins. Specifically, processing of microRNA (miRNA) in the nucleus minimally requires the enzyme Drosha and its dsRBD‐containing cofactor protein, DGCR8. The smallest recombinant construct of DGCR8 that is sufficient for in vitro dsRNA binding, referred to as DGCR8‐Core, consists of its two dsRBDs and a C‐terminal tail. As dsRBDs rarely recognize the nucleotide sequence of dsRNA, it is reasonable to hypothesize that DGCR8 function is dependent on the recognition of specific structural features in the miRNA precursor. Previously, we demonstrated that noncanonical structural elements that promote RNA flexibility within the stem of miRNA precursors are necessary for efficient in vitro cleavage by reconstituted Microprocessor complexes. Here, we combine gel shift assays with in vitro processing assays to demonstrate that neither the N‐terminal dsRBD of DGCR8 in isolation nor the DGCR8‐Core construct is sensitive to the presence of noncanonical structural elements within the stem of miRNA precursors, or to single‐stranded segments flanking the stem. Extending DGCR8‐Core to include an N‐terminal heme‐binding region does not change our conclusions. Thus, our data suggest that although the DGCR8‐Core region is necessary for dsRNA binding and recruitment to the Microprocessor, it is not sufficient to establish the previously observed connection between RNA flexibility and processing efficiency. Proteins 2015; 83:1165–1179. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Nucleolin protein interacts with microprocessor complex to affect biogenesis of microRNAs 15a and 16

MicroRNAs (miRNA) are endogenous, short, non-coding RNA that undergo a multistep biogenesis before generating the functional, mature sequence. The core components of the microprocessor complex, consisting of Drosha and DGCR8, are both necessary and sufficient for this process, although accessory proteins have been found that modulate the biogenesis of a subset of miRNA. Curiously, many of the proteins involved in miRNA biogenesis are also needed for ribosomal RNA processing. Here we show that nucleolin, another protein critical for rRNA processing, is involved in the biogenesis of microRNA 15a/16 (miR-15a/16), specifically at the primary to precursor stage of processing. Through overexpression and knockdown studies, we show that miR-15a/16 levels are directly correlated to nucleolin expression. Furthermore, we found that cellular localization is critical for the proper functioning of nucleolin in this pathway and that nucleolin directly interacts with DGCR8 and Drosha in the nucleus. Nucleolin can bind to the primary miRNA both directly and specifically. Finally, we show that in the absence of nucleolin, cell extracts are unable to process miR-15a/16 in vitro and that this can be rescued by the addition of nucleolin. Our findings offer a new protein component in the microRNA biogenesis pathway and lend insight into miRNA dysregulation in certain cancers.     

A heterotrimer model of the complete Microprocessor complex revealed by single-molecule subunit counting

During microRNA (miRNA) biogenesis, the Microprocessor complex (MC), composed minimally of Drosha, an RNaseIII enzyme, and DGCR8, a double-stranded RNA-binding protein, cleaves the primary-miRNA (pri-miRNA) to release the pre-miRNA stem–loop structure. Size-exclusion chromatography of the MC, isolated from mammalian cells, suggested multiple copies of one or both proteins in the complex. However, the exact stoichiometry was unknown. Initial experiments suggested that DGCR8 bound pri-miRNA substrates specifically, and given that Drosha could not be bound or cross-linked to RNA, a sequential model for binding was established in which DGCR8 bound first and recruited Drosha. Therefore, many laboratories have studied DGCR8 binding to RNA in the absence of Drosha and have shown that deletion constructs of DGCR8 can multimerize in the presence of RNA. More recently, it was demonstrated that Drosha can bind pri-miRNA substrates in the absence of DGCR8, casting doubt on the sequential model of binding. In the same study, using a single-molecule photobleaching assay, fluorescent protein-tagged deletion constructs of DGCR8 and Drosha assembled into a heterotrimeric complex on RNA, comprising two DGCR8 molecules and one Drosha molecule. To determine the stoichiometry of Drosha and DGCR8 within the MC in the absence of added RNA, we also used a single-molecule photobleaching assay and confirmed the heterotrimeric model of the human MC. We demonstrate that a heterotrimeric complex is likely preformed in the absence of RNA and exists even when full-length proteins are expressed and purified from human cells, and when hAGT-derived tags are used rather than fluorescent proteins.     

Backbone 1HN, 13C, and 15N resonance assignments of the tandem RNA-binding domains of human DGCR8

Double-stranded RNA binding domain (dsRBD) containing proteins are critical components of the microRNA (miRNA) pathway, with key roles in small RNA biogenesis, modification, and regulation. DiGeorge Critical Region 8 (DGCR8) is a 773 amino acid, dsRBD-containing protein that was originally identified in humans as a protein encoded in the region of chromosome 22 that is deleted in patients with DiGeorge syndrome. Now, it is realized that DGCR8 complements the nuclear RNase III Drosha to initiate miRNA biogenesis by promoting efficient recognition and cleavage of primary miRNAs (pri-miRNA). A pair of C-terminal tandem dsRBDs separated by a flexible linker are required for pri-miRNA substrate binding and recognition. The crystal structure of the DGCR8 core region comprising residues 493–720 revealed that each dsRBD adopts the canonical αβββα fold. However, several residues located in important flexible regions including the β1-β2-loop implicated in canonical dsRNA recognition are absent in the crystal structure and no RNA-bound structure of DGCR8 has been reported. Here we report the ¹H^N, ¹³C, and ¹⁵N backbone resonance assignments of the 24 kDa, 214 amino acid human DGCR8^core (residues 493–706) by heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy. Our assignments lay the foundation for a detailed solution state characterization of the dynamical and RNA-binding properties of this protein in solution.     

Dynamic origins of differential RNA binding function in two dsRBDs from the miRNA "microprocessor" complex

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) affect gene regulation by base pairing with mRNA and contribute to the control of cellular homeostasis. The first step in miRNA maturation is conducted in the nucleus by the "microprocessor" complex made up of an RNase III enzyme, Drosha, that contains one dsRNA binding domain (dsRBD), and DGCR8, that contains two dsRBDs in tandem. The crystal structure of DGCR8-Core (493-720), containing both dsRBDs, and the NMR solution structure of Drosha-dsRBD (1259-1337) have been reported, but the solution dynamics have not been explored for any of these dsRBDs. To better define the mechanism of dsRNA binding and thus the nuclear maturation step of miRNA processing, we report NMR spin relaxation and MD simulations of Drosha-dsRBD (1259-1337) and DGCR8-dsRBD1 (505-583). The study was motivated by electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) of the two dsRBDs, which showed that Drosha-dsRBD does not bind a representative miRNA but isolated DGCR8-dsRBD1 does (K(d) = 9.4 ± 0.4 μM). Our results show that loop 2 in both dsRBDs is highly dynamic but the pattern of the correlations observed in MD is different for the two proteins. Additionally, the extended loop 1 of Drosha-dsRBD is more flexible than the corresponding loop in DGCR8-dsRBD1 but shows no correlation with loop 2, which potentially explains the lack of dsRNA binding by Drosha-dsRBD in the absence of the RNase III domains. The results presented in this study provide key structural and dynamic features of dsRBDs that contribute to the binding mechanism of these domains to dsRNA.     

Formation of GW bodies is a consequence of microRNA genesis

GW bodies (GWBs), or mammalian P bodies, proposed to be involved in messenger RNA storage and/or degradation, have recently been linked to RNA interference and microRNA (miRNA) processing. We report that endogenous let-7 miRNA co-precipitates with the GW182 protein complex. In addition, knockdown of two proteins, Drosha and its protein partner DGCR8, which are vital to the generation of mature miRNA, results in the loss of GWBs. Subsequent introduction of short interference RNA specific to lamin A/C is accompanied by reassembly of GWBs and concurrent knockdown of lamin A/C protein. Taken together, these studies show that miRNAs are crucial components in GWB formation.     

SUMOylation at K707 of DGCR8 controls direct function of primary microRNA

DGCR8 (DiGeorge syndrome critical region gene 8) is essential for primary microRNA (pri-miRNA) processing in the cell nucleus. It specifically combines with Drosha, a nuclear RNase III enzyme, to form the Microprocessor complex (MC) that cleaves pri-miRNA to precursor miRNA (pre-miRNA), which is further processed to mature miRNA by Dicer, a cytoplasmic RNase III enzyme. Increasing evidences suggest that pri-/pre-miRNAs have direct functions in regulation of gene expression, however the underlying mechanism how it is fine-tuned remains unclear. Here we find that DGCR8 is modified by SUMO1 at the major site K⁷⁰⁷, which can be promoted by its ERK-activated phosphorylation. SUMOylation of DGCR8 enhances the protein stability by preventing the degradation via the ubiquitin proteasome pathway. More importantly, SUMOylation of DGCR8 does not alter its association with Drosha, the MC activity and miRNA biogenesis, but rather influences its affinity with pri-miRNAs. This altered affinity of DGCR8 with pri-miRNAs seems to control the direct functions of pri-miRNAs in recognition and repression of the target mRNAs, which is evidently linked to the DGCR8 function in regulation of tumorigenesis and cell migration. Collectively, our data suggest a novel mechanism that SUMOylation of DGCR8 controls direct functions of pri-miRNAs in gene silencing.     

A central role for the primary microRNA stem in guiding the position and efficiency of Drosha processing of a viral pri-miRNA

Processing of primary microRNA (pri-miRNA) stem–loops by the Drosha–DGCR8 complex is the initial step in miRNA maturation and crucial for miRNA function. Nonetheless, the underlying mechanism that determines the Drosha cleavage site of pri-miRNAs has remained unclear. Two prevalent but seemingly conflicting models propose that Drosha–DGCR8 anchors to and directs cleavage a fixed distance from either the basal single-stranded (ssRNA) or the terminal loop. However, recent studies suggest that the basal ssRNA and/or the terminal loop may influence the Drosha cleavage site dependent upon the sequence/structure of individual pri-miRNAs. Here, using a panel of closely related pri-miRNA variants, we further examine the role of pri-miRNA structures on Drosha cleavage site selection in cells. Our data reveal that both the basal ssRNA and terminal loop influence the Drosha cleavage site within three pri-miRNAs, the Simian Virus 40 (SV40) pri-miRNA, pri-miR-30a, and pri-miR-16. In addition to the flanking ssRNA regions, we show that an internal loop within the SV40 pri-miRNA stem strongly influences Drosha cleavage position and efficiency. We further demonstrate that the positions of the internal loop, basal ssRNA, and the terminal loop of the SV40 pri-miRNA cooperatively coordinate Drosha cleavage position and efficiency. Based on these observations, we propose that the pri-miRNA stem, defined by internal and flanking structural elements, guides the binding position of Drosha–DGCR8, which consequently determines the cleavage site. This study provides mechanistic insight into pri-miRNA processing in cells that has numerous biological implications and will assist in refining Drosha-dependent shRNA design.     

Dimerization and heme binding are conserved in amphibian and starfish homologues of the microRNA processing protein DGCR8

Human DiGeorge Critical Region 8 (DGCR8) is an essential microRNA (miRNA) processing factor that is activated via direct interaction with Fe(III) heme. In order for DGCR8 to bind heme, it must dimerize using a dimerization domain embedded within its heme-binding domain (HBD). We previously reported a crystal structure of the dimerization domain from human DGCR8, which demonstrated how dimerization results in the formation of a surface important for association with heme. Here, in an attempt to crystallize the HBD, we search for DGCR8 homologues and show that DGCR8 from Patiria miniata (bat star) also binds heme. The extinction coefficients (ε) of DGCR8-heme complexes are determined; these values are useful for biochemical analyses and allow us to estimate the heme occupancy of DGCR8 proteins. Additionally, we present the crystal structure of the Xenopus laevis dimerization domain. The structure is very similar to that of human DGCR8. Our results indicate that dimerization and heme binding are evolutionarily conserved properties of DGCR8 homologues not only in vertebrates, but also in at least some invertebrates.