Neuron-specific enolase in the diagnosis and therapy monitoring of lung cancer: a comparison with CEA, TPA, ferritin and calcitonin

The significance of neuron-specific enolase (NSE) in the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of lung cancer was investigated in comparison with such established tumour markers as carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tissue polypeptide antigen (TPA), ferritin and calcitonin. We determined the serum concentrations of these tumour markers in 25 patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC), 30 patients with non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and 38 patients with benign pulmonary diseases (BPD). In 14 patients with lung cancer, it was possible to follow up the behaviour of the tumour markers under treatment for up to 16 months. Calcitonin proved to have a surprisingly low sensitivity for SCLC. The utility of TPA and of ferritin was restricted, although the sensitivity was comparably high, by the high rate of false positive results. For NSCLC, CEA proved to be the best tumour marker. At present, NSE appears to be the tumour marker with the greatest specificity and sensitivity for SCLC. Its determination in the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of SCLC makes good sense.     

多种血清肿瘤标志物联合检测对肺癌诊断的临床意义分析

目的:探讨CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP联合检测对肺癌的诊、诊断的敏感度以及特异性。方法:对我院收治的确诊为肺癌的患者选取120例作为A组,同期选择肺部良性病变患者61例作为B组,以及50例健康体检患者作为C组,将三组研究对象分别进行CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP的检测。结果:A组患者CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP的血清中含量明显高于B组以及C组(P<0.05);五种标记物联合检测的敏感度明显高于单一标志物的敏感度(P<0.05),但其特异性有明显的降低(P<0.05)。结论:采用CA125、CYFRA21-1、CEA、NSE、AFP联合检测,对肺癌的早期诊断以及治疗预后有较好的指导作用。     

A Highly Efficient Gene Expression Programming (GEP) Model for Auxiliary Diagnosis of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Background

Lung cancer is an important and common cancer that constitutes a major public health problem, but early detection of small cell lung cancer can significantly improve the survival rate of cancer patients. A number of serum biomarkers have been used in the diagnosis of lung cancers; however, they exhibit low sensitivity and specificity.

Methods

We used biochemical methods to measure blood levels of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), C-reactive protein (CRP), Na⁺, Cl^-, carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA), and neuron specific enolase (NSE) in 145 small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients and 155 non-small cell lung cancer and 155 normal controls. A gene expression programming (GEP) model and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves incorporating these biomarkers was developed for the auxiliary diagnosis of SCLC.

Results

After appropriate modification of the parameters, the GEP model was initially set up based on a training set of 115 SCLC patients and 125 normal controls for GEP model generation. Then the GEP was applied to the remaining 60 subjects (the test set) for model validation. GEP successfully discriminated 281 out of 300 cases, showing a correct classification rate for lung cancer patients of 93.75% (225/240) and 93.33% (56/60) for the training and test sets, respectively. Another GEP model incorporating four biomarkers, including CEA, NSE, LDH, and CRP, exhibited slightly lower detection sensitivity than the GEP model, including six biomarkers. We repeat the models on artificial neural network (ANN), and our results showed that the accuracy of GEP models were higher than that in ANN. GEP model incorporating six serum biomarkers performed by NSCLC patients and normal controls showed low accuracy than SCLC patients and was enough to prove that the GEP model is suitable for the SCLC patients.

Conclusion

We have developed a GEP model with high sensitivity and specificity for the auxiliary diagnosis of SCLC. This GEP model has the potential for the wide use for detection of SCLC in less developed regions.     

Immunoradiometric assay of chromogranin A in the diagnosis of small cell lung cancer: comparative evaluation with neuron-specific enolase

The aims of our work were 1) to determine the diagnostic performance of an immunoradiometric assay of chromogranin A (CgA) in small cell lung cancer and 2) to compare its discriminatory power with that of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), the marker currently used for SCLC. We selected 166 cases of small cell (64) and non-small cell (102) lung cancer and 106 cases of non-malignant lung diseases as controls. Both CgA and NSE were assayed by immunoradiometric methods and cutoff values were established on the basis of a pre-fixed specificity of 95% in non-malignant lung diseases. The CgA assay showed better diagnostic sensitivity than NSE in SCLC (61% versus 57%), especially in limited disease, and a low positivity rate in NSCLC with respect to NSE (14% versus 22%). By contrast, NSE reflected disease extent more accurately than CgA (U test: CgA p<0.05, NSE p<0.001). Finally, we found that the CgA assay was not affected by hemolysis whereas NSE serum levels greatly increased in hemolyzed sera. In conclusion, CgA assaying by an IRMA method is a reliable procedure in the diagnosis of SCLC. NSE remains the marker of choice in staging and monitoring of the disease. Further studies are needed to evaluate the prognostic significance of the marker and its role in therapy monitoring and patient follow-up.     

血清NSE、SCCA及CEA在肺癌早期诊断和预后预测中的应用价值研究

目的:研究血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCCA)及癌胚抗原(CEA)在肺癌早期诊断和预后预测中的应用价值。方法:选择我院2013年1月~2017年1月收治的110例肺癌患者(肺癌组)及同期96例肺部良性疾病患者(肺良性病组)和85例门诊健康体检者(对照组)。比较各组血清NSE、SCCA及CEA水平,采用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以上指标对肺癌的诊断价值。结果:肺癌组血清NSE、SCCA、CEA水平高于肺良性病组及对照组,肺良性病组血清NSE、SCCA、CEA水平高于对照组(P<0.05)。肺癌Ⅲ+Ⅳ组血清NSE、SCCA及CEA水平高于Ⅰ+Ⅱ组(P<0.05)。小细胞肺癌组血清NSE水平高于鳞癌组、腺癌组,鳞癌组血清SCCA水平高于腺癌组及小细胞肺癌组,腺癌组血清CEA水平高于鳞癌组及小细胞肺癌组(P<0.05)。NSE<16.0μg/L者平均无疾病进展生存期(PFS)长于NSE≥16.0μg/L,SCCA<1.5μg/L者平均PFS长于SCCA≥1.5μg/L,CEA<5.0μg/L平均PFS长于CEA≥5.0μg/L(P<0.05)。NSE、SCCA和CEA及三者联合诊断肺癌的ROC曲线下面积分别为0.880、0.651、0.830及0.937,NSE+SCCA+CEA联合诊断的曲线下面积高于单个指标单独诊断(P<0.05)。结论:血清NSE、SCCA及CEA对肺癌的诊断有重要的参考价值,且有利于肺癌的分期、分型及预后评价。     

肺癌患者血清CEA，CA19-9，CA125 及CA153 围手术期动态监测的临床 意义

目的:探讨动态监测肺癌患者围手术期血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125及CA153水平变化的临床意义。方法:随机选取2014年5月至2015年5月收治的肺癌患者58例为研究对象,另选取同期在我院接受体检的健康人群15例为对照组。分别测定肺癌患者手术前及术后1天、1周、1个月、3个月的血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、CA153水平,并与对照组的上述各血清肿瘤标志物进行比较。结果:肺癌患者术前空腹血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、CA153水平明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.01)。肺癌患者术后1天、1周、1个月及3个月的血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、CA153水平明显低于术前,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。肺癌患者术后1个月的平均空腹血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、CA153水平高于术后3个月平均水平,但差异不具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对肺癌患者的血清CEA、CA19-9、CA125、CA153水平进行围手术期动态监测有助于评估手术治疗效果。     

神经元特异性烯醇酶和癌胚抗原胶体金免疫层析联合检测

目的：应用双抗夹心胶体金免疫层析方法,实现对神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）和癌胚抗原（CEA）两种肺癌肿瘤标志物的快速联合检测。方法：采用柠檬酸三钠还原法制备20nm胶体金颗粒,并分别对鼠抗NSE、CEA单克隆抗体进行标记,分别与之相配对的另一种单克隆抗体被喷在硝酸纤维素膜（NC膜）上,制成免疫层析检测试条。溶液中的抗原NSE、CEA与金标记抗体结合后沿着硝酸纤维素膜移动,与膜上固定的抗体结合形成肉眼可见的红色线条。结果：该试纸条只与NSE、CEA有特异性反应,与CA125、CYFRA21-1、TPA等肺癌标志物无交叉反应。标准样品中两种抗原的检测灵敏度分别可达到5ng/mL和3ng/mL。结论：胶体金免疫层析技术检测NSE、CEA特异性强、灵敏度高、简便快速,不需特殊仪器设备,有广泛应用价值。     

神经元特异性烯醇酶和癌胚抗原胶体金免疫层析联合检测

目的:应用双抗夹心胶体金免疫层析方法,实现对神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)和癌胚抗原(CEA)两种肺癌肿瘤标志物的快速联合检测。方法:采用柠檬酸三钠还原法制备20nm胶体金颗粒,并分别对鼠抗NSE、CEA单克隆抗体进行标记,分别与之相配对的另一种单克隆抗体被喷在硝酸纤维素膜(NC膜)上,制成免疫层析检测试条。溶液中的抗原NSE、CEA与金标记抗体结合后沿着硝酸纤维素膜移动,与膜上固定的抗体结合形成肉眼可见的红色线条。结果:该试纸条只与NSE、CEA有特异性反应,与CA125、CYFRA21-1、TPA等肺癌标志物无交叉反应。标准样品中两种抗原的检测灵敏度分别可达到5ng/mL和3ng/mL。结论:胶体金免疫层析技术检测NSE、CEA特异性强、灵敏度高、简便快速,不需特殊仪器设备,有广泛应用价值。     

血清CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1 联合支气管活检在周围型肺癌诊断鉴别中的应用

目的:探讨血清肿瘤标志物癌胚抗原(CEA)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)联合经纤维支气管镜肺活检(TBLB)在周围型肺癌诊断鉴别中的应用价值。方法:选择2012年9月到2014年9月在我院临床确诊的402例周围型肺癌患者。检测所有患者的血清CEA、NSE和CYFRA21-1的浓度及分析TBLB检测结果,分析不同病理类型和不同病灶直径大小时各项检测指标及联合检测的阳性检出率。结果:所有肺癌患者中,血清CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1和TBLB的阳性检出率分别为51.74%,35.07%,41.79%和60.70%。四项指标联合检测的阳性检出率为89.05%,明显分别高于四项指标的阳性检出率(均P0.05)。腺癌、鳞癌、小细胞肺癌及其他类型肺癌组四项联合检测的阳性检出率明显高于四项单独检测(均P0.05)。病灶直径为2 cm、2-6 cm和6 cm时,四项联合检测的阳性检出率明显高于四项单独检测(均P0.05)。结论:血清CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1联合TBLB检测周围型肺癌较单项检测,阳性检出率高,值得在临床上推广应用。     

Proliferating activity, DNA ploidy changes of lung cancer cells before and after chemotherapy

To assess proliferating activity, DNA ploidy changes of lung cancer cells before and after chemotherapy, we performed a flow cytometry analysis (FC) using fresh bronchoscopy specimens from 38 patients with lung cancer. Among 33 males and 5 females, squamous cell carcinoma (NSLC) was recognized in 12 males, 15 males had small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and 6 males had lung cancer with no histological type (LC) defined. Three women had SCLC, 1 had NSCLC and one had LC. Control consisted of 11 COPD patients. The percentage of diploid cells was significantly lower and cells with hypoploid cells were significantly higher in study group before treatment. High percentage of G2M cells characterised NSCLC and LC groups, whether high number of S phase cells characterised NSCLC and SCLC group before treatment. The treatment lowered percentage of G2M cells in NSCLC and CA group, whether diploid, hypoploid and S phase cells did not differ than those from before treatment.     

Immunoassay of nine serological tumor markers on a hydrogel-based microchip

A prototype test-system for simultaneous quantitative assay of nine tumor markers in blood serum was developed. The main constituent of the test-system is an OM-9 biochip containing immobilized antibodies against nine oncomarkers: α-fetoprotein (AFP), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), cancer antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), cancer antigen 125 (CA 125), cancer antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), total and free forms of prostate-specific antigen (PSA_tot and PSA_free), and neuron-specific enolase (NSE). The biochip-based two-step sandwich immunoassay procedure for carrying out simultaneous quantitative determination of nine tumor markers in patients’ blood serum was proposed. The main analytical characteristics of the method were obtained. The results suggest that the prototype of the test-system could be a promising instrument for clinical application. The test-system prototype was tested using blood serum samples of oncological patients (252 samples) and healthy donors (185 samples). Increased concentrations of one or more tumor markers above the normal level were found in 76.6% cases of oncological patients and only in 6% cases of healthy donors. For colorectal cancer patients, application of modern statistical methods of data processing in medical research, i.e., receiver operating characteristics analysis (ROC curve) and logistic regression, indicated that the simultaneous assay of nine markers on biochips showed much more diagnostic significance (area under the ROC curve, AUC, was 0.84) than a traditional assay of two tumor markers, CEA and CA 19-9 (AUC = 0.59). The developed biochip-based test-system can be recommended for both the estimation of people’s health, e.g., for standard medical examination, and tracking the tumoral process in the postsurgical period or after specific tumor treatment.     

CEA determination in the follow-up of extracolorectal neoplasms.

CEA was initially described as a tumor and organ specific colorectal antigen, but later found by more sensitive methods in other tumors (stomach, pancreas, lung, breast) and in minor amounts in inflammatory, normal adult and fetal organs of the gastrointestinal tract. The main clinical application of CEA concerns its pretherapeutic and serial determination as circulating antigen in serum and other body fluids by means of CEA-specific, commercially available test kits. By clinical studies a significant correlation has been proven between the pretherapeutic serum CEA level and tumor stages and prognosis. Moreover, serial CEA level changes have been shown a valuable monitor following operation or during radio/chemotherapy anticipating and reflecting the clinical course of disease. In combination with newly established tumor markers, the main clinical indication for CEA determination in addition to colorectal cancer concerns monitoring of patients with stomach (+CA 72-4), lung (+NSE/SCC) and breast cancer (+CA 15-3/MCA).     

肺癌患者血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的检测及临床意义

目的探讨外周血癌胚抗原(CEA)、细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)和神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)的检测对肺癌的诊断、病理分型和疗效判断的临床用价值。方法采用化学发光法检测了62例肺癌患者、54例良性肺部疾病患者、36例健康人、40例肺癌患者手术前后血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的水平。结果肺癌患者手术前血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的含量明显高于良性肺部疾病组及正常对照组(P0.01)。鳞癌组、腺癌组和小细胞癌组之间肿瘤标志物CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE水平差异有统计学意义。CEA阳性率以腺癌组最高(84%),CYFRA21-1阳性率以鳞癌组最高(85.2%),NSE阳性率以小细胞癌组最高(80.0%)。手术治疗后未复发转移组CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE水平低于术前,而复发转移组与术前比变化不显著(P0.05)。结论血清CEA、CYFRA21-1和NSE的检测对不同病理类型肺癌患者的诊断、病情检测及疗效判断有较好的临床参考价值。     

Serum tumor markers may precede instrumental response to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic cancer

PURPOSE: Although serum tumor markers (STMs) are widely used in clinical practice, their predictive role for the response to anticancer treatment is still controversial. The correlation of CEA, CA 15.3, CA 19.9, CA 125 (only with peritoneal involvement) and NSE levels with imaging response and clinical benefit was investigated in 60 non-selected patients with metastatic epithelial cancers treated by single-agent docetaxel chemotherapy. METHODS: STM measurement was performed at baseline and subsequently every three to four weeks. We applied the WHO criteria to evaluate both STM and instrumental responses. Concordance analysis was performed by the Cohen Kw index, and the significance of the results was established using the Fleiss, Cohen & Everitt test. Qualitative interpretation of data was obtained with the Landis & Koch scale. Correlations of STM response with clinical benefit (PS or pain improvement) were evaluated by the chi-square test. RESULTS: The primary tumors included breast cancers (38 patients), gastrointestinal non-colorectal cancers (12 patients), and lung cancers (10 patients). An overall significant good degree of agreement was observed between STM and instrumental response (p < 0.0005). The degree of agreement for each marker was as follows: excellent for CEA (p < 0.0005) and CA 125 (p = 0.006), good for CA 15.3 (p < 0.0005) and CA 19.9 (p = 0.011). Restricted analysis for the correlation of each marker with primary tumor origin showed good prediction of radiological response for CA 15.3 and CEA in breast cancer patients (p<0.0005 for both), for CEA and CA 19.9 in gastrointestinal cancer patients (p = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively), and for CEA+NSE in lung cancer patients (p = 0.01). Conversely, STM response did not correlate significantly with the clinical benefit for the patients, both in terms of PS and pain improvement (p = 0.24 and p=0.42, respectively). CONCLUSION: This study showed STMs to be good predictors of tumor response. Although STMs cannot replace diagnostic imaging, in metastatic cancer they might be useful to optimize the timing of radiological re-evaluation in the palliative setting.     

钼靶X线摄片联合肿瘤相关标志物检测对乳腺癌的诊断价值

目的:探讨乳腺钼靶X射线摄片与血清糖类抗原15-3(CA15-3)、癌胚抗原(CEA)和骨桥蛋白(OPN)联合检测对乳腺癌的临床诊断价值。方法:选择在我院经手术和病理证实为乳腺癌的患者60例作为研究组,另选取60例健康体检者作为对照组。分别检测两组的血清CA15-3、CEA和OPN水平,并采用乳腺钼靶X射线检查。比较X射与血清学检测单独检测及联合检测的阳性率。结果:研究组患者血清CA15-3、CEA及OPN水平均显著高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05);血清CA15-3、CEA、OPN和钼靶X射线摄片联合检测的敏感性显著高于单独检测,差异具有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:对乳腺癌患者进行钼靶X射线摄片及肿瘤相关标志物检测可提高阳性检出率,有利于乳腺癌的早期诊断及治疗。     

Early diagnosis of lung cancer by detection of tumor liberated protein

Tumor liberated protein (TLP) is a protein that can be used to reveal the early development of a tumor. Besides being formed in the tumor, TLP is released in the blood when a patient starts producing cancer cells, which in turn enables the physician to intervene at a stage when the cancer is operable. To date, the available studies of tumor markers in lung cancer patients are CEA, NSE, TPA, Chromogranine, CA125, CA19-9, and Cyfra 21-1. The sensitivity and specificity for serum markers ranges between 50 and 90%, depending on the study and the clinical samples analyzed. Most of these markers show an increased rate of positivity as the stage advances. There are very limited data on TLP to draw any firm conclusion regarding the diagnostic value of this marker. TLP has been detected in 53.1% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (N = 534) with 75% being positive in the early stage (stage I) and dropping to 45% in the late stage (stage IV). However, 7.6% blood donor sera and 17.4% chronic lung disease sera have also tested positive. In a confirmation study, the specificity was 89.94% and the sensibility was 63.63% from stage III to IV NSCLC patients. In an initial study of TLP as a marker for early detection in stage I, NSCLC patients showed a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 80% for TLP compared to a sensitivity of 33.3% for CA19-9, 11.1% for Cyfra 21-1 and CA125, and 0% for CEA; the specificity for all four of the latter markers was 100%. Using immunohistochemical analysis with peroxidase anti-peroxidase (PAP), we observed that NSCLC cells were positive; we used the specific rabbit antiserum to TLP, which turned out negative in the presence of 1 mg/ml of the synthetized peptide. The pre-serum was also negative. The same reactivity was found early in the modified epithelial cells of interstitial lung fibrosis and might be a predictive marker of cell transformation. The site of the peroxidase positivity was cytoplasmic, of diffuse and/or granular type.     

Combination of Circulating Tumor Cells with Serum Carcinoembryonic Antigen Enhances Clinical Prediction of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) have emerged as a potential biomarker in the diagnosis, prognosis, treatment, and surveillance of lung cancer. However, CTC detection is not only costly, but its sensitivity is also low, thus limiting its usage and the collection of robust data regarding the significance of CTCs in lung cancer. We aimed to seek clinical variables that enhance the prediction of CTCs in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Clinical samples and pathological data were collected from 169 NSCLC patients. CTCs were detected by CellSearch and tumor markers were detected using the Luminex xMAP assay. Univariate analyses revealed that histology, tumor stage, tumor size, invasiveness, tumor grade and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) were associated with the presence of CTCs. However, the level of CTCs was not associated with the degree of nodal involvement (N) or tumor prognostic markers Ki-67, CA125, CA199, Cyfra21-1, and SCCA. Using logistic regression analysis, we found that the combination of CTCs with tumor marker CEA has a better disease prediction. Advanced stage NSCLC patients with elevated CEA had higher numbers of CTCs. These data suggest a useful prediction model by combining CTCs with serum CEA in NSCLC patients.     

血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌辅助诊断中的应用

目的 探讨血清肿瘤标志物在肺癌诊断中的临床价值。方法 收集40例健康人、45例肺部良性疾病患者和90例肺癌患者,采用电化学发光分析检测患者血清中肿瘤标志物细胞角蛋白19（CYFRA21-1）、鳞状细胞癌相关抗原（SCC）和癌胚抗原（CEA）,以及胃泌素释放肽前体（pro-GRP）和神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）的含量。结果 健康人组和肺部良性疾病患者组血清NSE、pro-GRP、CYFRA21-1、SCC和CEA水平较肺癌患者组水平低,差异有统计学意义（P<0.01）。NSE和pro-GRP在小细胞肺癌患者中的水平均明显高于其他类型的肺癌患者（P<0.01）,CYFRA21-1和SCC在鳞癌患者中的含量比其他类型肺癌患者高（P<0.01）。联合检测此5种血清肿瘤标志物敏感性高于单独的肿瘤标志物（P<0.01）。结论 联合检测NSE、pro-GRP、CYFRA21-1、SCC和CEA可以提高肺癌诊断的灵敏度。     

Tumor markers and lung cancer: correlation between serum and bronchial secretion levels of CEA, TPA, CanAg CA-50, NSE and ferritin

The levels of carcinoembryonic antigeny (CEA), tissue polypeptide antigeny (TPA), CanAg 50, neuron specific enolase (NSE) and ferritin were determined in bronchial secretion and serum of patients with neoplastic and non-neoplastic lung diseases. Simultaneous determination of two or three markers in the serum and in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) may be clinically useful for the diagnosis of lung cancer and even for the type of tumor. The positivity of CEA determined simultaneously in serum and in BAL of patients with lung cancer is higher than 80% whereas in patients with benign lung disease it is lower than 40%. The simultaneous assay of TPA in serum and in BAL showed 100% positivity in patients with oat-cell carcinoma, the frequencies of positivity were similar in patients with non-oat-cell carcinoma. For NSE and CanAg CA-50 patients with oat-cell carcinoma showed 100% positivity. Simultaneous assay of ferritin in serum and in BAL gave 85% positivity in patients with oat-cell carcinoma and only 23% in patients with non-oat-cell carcinoma. We conclude that the simultaneous determination of CEA and CanAg CA-50 or NSE in serum and in BAL is a useful aid in the diagnosis of lung malignancy.     

血清细胞角蛋白19、神经元特异性烯醇化酶及鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原在小细胞肺癌诊断及病情评估中的作用研究

摘要 目的：分析血清细胞角蛋白19（CK19）、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）及鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原（SCCA）在小细胞肺癌诊断及病情评估中的作用。方法：选择我院自2020年1月至2022年7月收治的85例小细胞肺癌患者作为观察组,另选同期的85例肺部良性疾病患者作为对照组。检测两组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平,比较两组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平及其阳性率,使用ROC曲线下面积（AUC）分析上述指标对小细胞肺癌的诊断效能,观察小细胞肺癌不同分期患者血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平的差异性,分析观察组治疗前后血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平的变化情况。结果：观察组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平均较对照组高（P＜0.05）;观察组血清CK19、NSE和SCCA的阳性率均较对照组高（P＜0.05）;经ROC曲线分析,血清CK19、NSE联合SCCA诊断小细胞肺癌的敏感度为91.23 %,特异度为84.67 %,AUC为0.910;在85例小细胞肺癌患者中,临床分期为局限期33例、广泛期52例;广泛期患者血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平均高于局限期患者（P＜0.05）。结论：血清CK19、NSE联合SCCA诊断小细胞肺癌的效能较好,三者均与患者病情严重程度有关,有利于此病的早期诊断和病情评估,值得进一步研究应用。