New developments in the treatment and monitoring of type 1 diabetes mellitus

In recent years, insulin analogues are the benefits of the use in functional intensive insulin therapy for the treatment of diabetes. Shortacting insulin (lispro, aspart and glulisine) and long-acting insulin (glargine and detemir) have been developed for the management of diabetes. Short-acting insulin analogues are an alternative to regular human insulin before meals. These new short-acting insulin analogues show more rapid onset of activity and a shorter duration of action. As a result of these pharmacokinetic differences, an improved postprandial glycemic control is achieved, without increasing the risk of hypoglycemia. In addition, these insulin analogues can be administered immediately before a meal. The long-acting insulin analogues provide basal insulin levels for 24 h when administered once (glargine) or two (detemir) daily. Compared with previous intermediate- or long-acting conventional insulin, these insulins shows a flat profile of plasma insulin levels . The use of these long-acting insulin analogues appears to be associated with a reduced incidence of hypoglycemia, especially at night. The availability of these new insulin analogues has the potential to significantly improve long-term control over blood glucose in diabetic patients. In recent years more and more frequently the method of multiple daily injections (MDI) of insulin is being replaced by the method of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). It is the most physiological way to administer insulin. In recent years treatment with insulin pumps has been used more frequently in the pediatric patients and in the treatment of diabetes in pregnancy. Use of continuous glucose monitoring systems enables detection of glycemia fluctuations unrevealed by selfmonitoring of blood glucose, such as night hypoglycemias and early postprandial hyperglycemias. Real-time systems allow to reduce HbA1c levels and limit number of excursions. Non-invasive glucose measurement devices are introduced. Fully automated continuous glucose monitoring systems integrated with insulin pumps operating in closed-loop model, requiring no patient assistance, are still being researched. Commercially available systems operate in open-loop model, where the patient has to decide on administration and dose of insulin.     

Analogues et dosages d’insuline : le cas général et le cas particulier de la glargine

Since 1996, genetic engineering has allowed modifications of insulin yielding to multiple modified insulins with different pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic properties. Molecules with maintained pharmacodynamic and modified pharmacokinetic profiles have been selected. Currently available rapid-acting analogues (lispro, aspart and glulisine) achieve plasma peak concentrations about twice as high and within approximately half the time compared with regular human insulin thus closely mimicking the physiological insulin response to a meal. Long-acting analogues (glargine and detemir) ensure the steady supplement of basal insulin plasma levels, with a plateau type of profile. Main analytical pitfalls of commercially human insulin immunoassays include crossreactivity with analogues and their metabolites. These crossreactivities are of great concern for interpreting insulin levels in patients treated with analogues. The development of more specific analytical methods to quantify separately the concentrations of endogenous insulin, rapid-acting and long-acting analogues and metabolites would be of utmost importance: (1) to further understand long-acting analogue variability in terms of efficiency; (2) to perform analogue kinetic studies; (3) to measure analogues in routine toxicology (forensic medicine) and (4) to assess intact glargine or glargine metabolite in vivo toxicity: recent debates about glargine safety have highlighted the lack of data about metabolite status (proportion of metabolized glargine and bioactivity of its metabolite). This goal could be achieved by specific immunoassay development or/and mass spectrometry analysis.     

Experience with insulin analogues in children

Current data on rapid and long-acting insulin analogues in the paediatric age group is limited. While several studies indicate a benefit in reducing hypoglycaemia, particularly at night, with rapid or long-acting insulin analogue treatment, the effect on long-term glycaemic control remains controversial. The continuous glucose monitoring system offers a new option for tailoring treatment with insulin analogues to achieve optimal glycaemia. In 29 adolescents with diabetes this approach confirmed the non-inferiority of postprandial rapid-acting analogue administration compared to preprandial regular insulin, but revealed significant mealtime differences, with increased analogue requirement at breakfast and dinner. Although rapid- and long-acting insulin analogues may offer potential benefits for problems frequently encountered in paediatric diabetology, their value for the individual child still has to be tested in long-term observations in daily clinical practice.     

Seguridad de los análogos de insulina: qué evaluar,cómo hacerlo y cómo interpretar los resultados

The widespread use of insulin analogues is based not only on the pharmacokinetics of these preparations, which is much closer to the physiology of insulin secretion under normal conditions, but also on their safety and effectiveness. The publication of a possible association between the use of a long-acting insulin analogue (glargine) and breast cancer has caused uneasiness among the medical community regarding the safety of these analogues.The mechanism of increased tumor activity of insulin analogues is explained by the fact that they act through insulin receptors (IR) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1R), stimulating cell growth and inhibiting apoptosis. There are two major mechanisms: an increase in the binding time of insulin to IR and increased activation of IGF-1R. Therefore, to evaluate the safety of an analogue, the slower dissociation rate from its insulin receptor must be excluded, as well as the increased affinity for the IGF-1 receptor. This is equivalent to an index of mitogenic/metabolic activity of less than 1. These aspects can only be evaluated through study of cell lines and animal testing, which are reductionist models that cannot always be extrapolated to humans. To date, there are no data to question the safety of insulin analogues in general. However, the results of observational studies and some in vitro studies, suggesting a potential risk of mitogenicity with the administration of glargine, have caused some alarm among the medical community. Until now, there are no data to refute or confirm this risk and, therefore, evaluation of the existing data is crucial to obtain objective information.     

The Use of Premixed Insulin Analogues in the Treatment of Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Advantages and Limitations

Background:Intensive, target-oriented therapy is the standard of care in the management of patients with type 2 diabetesmellitus (DM). Early and aggressive use of insulin that is as close as possible to the physiologic pattern of insulin secretion from healthy pancreatic β-cells is advocated to achieve glycemic goals and reduce complications of DM.Objective:The objective of this article was to review the characteristics, advantages, and drawbacks of premixedinsulin analogues and to evaluate their role in the treatment of patients with type 2 DM.Methods:A PubMed search of articles from 1990 to 2006 was undertaken using the search terms type 2 diabetes, basalbolus therapy, premixed insulins, biphasic insulins, and insulin analogues. Pertinent content from relevant articles was extracted and combined with the authors' knowledge, experience, and clinical expertise.Results:The advent of insulin analogues has streamlined the treatment of patients with DM. When to initiate insulin during the course of treatment is the subject of much debate. Insulin therapy targeting both fasting and postprandial hyperglycemia is important in achieving optimal blood glucose (BG) control in patients with type 2 DM. A practical and feasible option is the use of >1 injection of premixed insulin analogues. Premixed insulin preparations provide both basal and prandial coverage because of their biphasic pharmacokinetic properties. Clinical trials have shown that these agents improve glycemic control, are associated with an acceptably low rate of severe hypoglycemia, and have a high degree of patient acceptance. Limitations include the inability to adjust the long- and short-acting components separately, to use a flexible regimen of self-titration and premeal bolus-insulin calculations, and to adequately treat postlunch and earlymorning BG elevations.Conclusion:Clinicians should be aware of premixed insulin analogues' advantages and limitations so that these agentscan be used appropriately in the treatment of patients with type 2 DM.     

Efficacy and safety of insulin analogues for the management of diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis

Background

Although insulin analogues are commonly prescribed for the management of diabetes mellitus, there is uncertainty regarding their optimal use. We conducted meta-analyses to compare the outcomes of insulin analogues with conventional insulins in the treatment of type 1, type 2 and gestational diabetes.

Methods

We updated 2 earlier systematic reviews of the efficacy and safety of rapid-and long-acting insulin analogues. We searched electronic databases, conference proceedings and “grey literature” up to April 2007 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared insulin analogues with conventional insulins. Study populations of interest were people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes (adult and pediatric) and women with gestational diabetes.

Results

We included 68 randomized controlled trials in the analysis of rapid-acting insulin analogues and 49 in the analysis of long-acting insulin analogues. Most of the studies were of short to medium duration and of low quality. In terms of hemoglobin A_1c, we found minimal differences between rapid-acting insulin analogues and regular human insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes (weighted mean difference for insulin lispro: –0.09%, 95% confidence interval [CI] –0.16% to –0.02%; for insulin aspart: –0.13%, 95% CI –0.20% to –0.07%). We observed similar outcomes among patients with type 2 diabetes (weighted mean difference for insulin lispro: –0.03%, 95% CI –0.12% to –0.06%; for insulin aspart: –0.09%, 95% CI –0.21% to 0.04%). Differences between long-acting insulin analogues and neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in terms of hemoglobin A_1c were marginal among adults with type 1 diabetes (weighted mean difference for insulin glargine: –0.11%, 95% CI –0.21% to –0.02%; for insulin detemir: –0.06%, 95% CI –0.13% to 0.02%) and among adults with type 2 diabetes (weighted mean difference for insulin glargine: –0.05%, 95% CI –0.13% to 0.04%; for insulin detemir: 0.13%, 95% CI 0.03% to 0.22%). Benefits in terms of reduced hypoglycemia were inconsistent. There were insufficient data to determine whether insulin analogues are better than conventional insulins in reducing long-term diabetes-related complications or death.

Interpretation

Rapid-and long-acting insulin analogues offer little benefit relative to conventional insulins in terms of glycemic control or reduced hypoglycemia. Long-term, high-quality studies are needed to determine whether insulin analogues reduce the risk of long-term complications of diabetes.Diabetes mellitus is associated with serious long-term complications and premature death.¹ Data from the Health Canada National Diabetes Surveillance System indicate that, in 2004/05, diabetes was diagnosed in about 5.5% (1.8 million) of Canadians aged 20 years and older.² Because the disease goes undetected in many cases, the true prevalence may approach 1.9 million.³Tight glycemic control, to maintain a hemoglobin A_1c concentration of 7.0% or less, is recommended for all patients with diabetes to reduce the risk of long-term complications such as cardiovascular-related death, retinopathy and nephropathy.⁴ Insulin is indicated for all patients with type 1 diabetes and for patients with type 2 diabetes if adequate glycemic control cannot be achieved through exercise, diet or oral antidiabetic therapy.⁴Conventional insulins include regular human insulin and intermediate-acting neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. However, these agents do not replicate the pattern of basal and postprandial endogenous secretion of insulin. Insulin analogues are modified human insulins developed to address this limitation.⁵ The rapid-acting insulin analogues insulin lispro, insulin aspart and insulin glulisine are marketed in Canada as bolus insulins; the long-acting agents insulin glargine and insulin detemir are marketed as basal insulins.⁶Systematic reviews of the insulin analogues have been published previously.^7–10 However, through our comprehensive search of the literature, we did not identify any reviews of long-acting insulin analogues in the management of type 1 diabetes or gestational diabetes. In this article, we provide an up-to-date, comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes associated with the use of rapid-and long-acting insulin analogues in type 1 and type 2 diabetes (adult and pediatric patients) and gestational diabetes. Detailed methods and complete results are reported elsewhere.^11,12     

Superiority of insulin analogues versus human insulin in the treatment of diabetes mellitus

The modern goals of insulin replacement in Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T1, T2DM) are A1C <6.5% long-term, and prevention of hypoglycaemia (blood glucose, BG <70 mg/dl). In addition to appropriate education and motivation of diabetic subjects, the use of rapid- and long-acting insulin analogues, is critical to achieve these goals. The benefits of rapid-acting analogues (lispro, aspart and glulisine have similar pharmacodynamic effects) compared with non-modified human regular insulin, are: (a) lower 1- and 2-h post-prandial blood glucose; (b) lower risk of late post-prandial hypoglycaemia (and therefore lower BG variability); (c) better quality of life (greater flexibility in timing and dosing of insulin). In T1DM, rapid-acting analogues improve A1C only by the extent to which replacement of basal insulin is optimized at the same time, either by multiple daily NPH administrations, or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), or use of the long-acting insulin analogues glargine or detemir. In T2DM, rapid-acting analogues reduce post-prandial hyperglycaemia more than human regular insulin, but systematic studies are needed to examine the effects on A1C. The benefits of long-acting insulin analogues glargine and detemir vs. NPH, are: (1) lower fasting BG combined with lower risk of hypoglycaemia in the interprandial state (night); (2) lower variability of BG. Glargine and detemir differ in terms of potency and duration of action. Detemir should be given twice daily in the large majority of people with T1DM, and in a large percentage of subjects with T2DM as well, usually at doses greater vs those of the once daily glargine. However, when used appropriately for individual pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, glargine and detemir result into similar effects on BG, risk of hypoglycaemia and A1C. Rapid- and long-acting insulin analogues should always be combined in the treatment of T1 and T2DM.     

Cost-effectiveness of insulin analogues for diabetes mellitus

Background

Insulin analogues may be associated with fewer episodes of hypoglycemia than conventional insulins. However, they are costly alternatives. We compared the cost-effectiveness of insulin analogues and conventional insulins used to treat type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus in adults.

Methods

We conducted a cost-effectiveness evaluation of insulin analogues versus conventional insulins using the Center for Outcomes Research Diabetes Model. We compared rapid-acting analogues (insulin aspart and insulin lispro) with regular human insulin, and long-acting analogues (insulin glargine and insulin detemir) with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. We derived clinical information for the comparisons from meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. We obtained cost and utility estimates from published sources. We performed sensitivity analyses to test the robustness of our results.

Results

For type 1 diabetes, insulin aspart was more effective and less costly than regular human insulin. Insulin lispro was associated with an incremental cost of Can$28 996 per quality-adjusted life-year. The incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year was Can$87 932 for insulin glargine and Can$387 729 for insulin detemir, compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin. For type 2 diabetes, insulin aspart was associated with an incremental cost of Can$22 488 per quality-adjusted life-year compared with regular human insulin. For insulin lispro, the incremental cost was Can$130 865. Compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin, insulin detemir was less effective and more costly. Insulin glargine was associated with an incremental cost of Can$642 994 per quality-adjusted life-year. The model was sensitive to changes in the effect size of hemoglobin A_1c and to decrements applied to utility scores when fear of hypoglycemia was included as a factor.

Interpretation

The cost-effectiveness of insulin analogues depends on the type of insulin analogue and whether the patient receiving the treatment has type 1 or type 2 diabetes. With the exception of rapid-acting insulin analogues in type 1 diabetes, routine use of insulin analogues, especially long-acting analogues in type 2 diabetes, is unlikely to represent an efficient use of finite health care resources.Insulin agents available for the treatment of diabetes mellitus include conventional insulins and insulin analogues. Insulin analogues were developed to mimic more closely the separate bolus and basal components of insulin secretion.¹ Rapid-acting (bolus or mealtime) and long-acting (basal or background) analogue formulations are available. This new class of drugs has been promoted as providing more flexible treatment schedules and a reduced risk of hypoglycemia relative to conventional insulins.¹The cost of insulin analogues exceeds that of conventional insulins.^2,3 More than US$7.3 billion was spent globally on the purchase of insulin products in 2005 — an increase of 19% over the previous year.⁴ It has been suggested that the increased expenditure was due to both the increasing prevalence of diabetes and the increased use of insulin analogues.⁵We performed an analysis of the cost-effectiveness of insulin analogues compared with conventional insulins in the management of type 1 or type 2 diabetes in adults.     

Solid Phase Synthesis of an Analogue of Insulin, A0:R glargine, That Exhibits Decreased Mitogenic Activity

Numerous analogues of insulin have been prepared over the past three decades for use in diabetic therapy. However, only two long-acting insulins have been approved for clinical use. One is Levemir (Novo Nordisk) and the other is Lantus (Sanofi-Aventis). Glargine (commercial name: Lantus) is characterized by a substitution of Gly in place of Asn at the C terminus of the A-chain and addition of two Arg residues to the C terminus of the B-chain. Despite the clinical advantages of glargine, it is not without concern that its increased affinity for the IGF-1 receptor may correlate with increased mitogenic activity. Recently, a systematic study of modified analogues of glargine showed that placement of an extra Arg residue at the N terminus of the A-chain conferred improved insulin:IGF-1 receptor selectivity without significant loss of pharmacological profile. However, as it is difficult to prepare such an analogue in high yield by recombinant DNA methods, we undertook its chemical assembly by our refined solid phase synthesis method. We describe herein its chemical preparation and biological activity in both insulin receptor binding assays and DNA synthesis assays. The synthetic analogue, A0:R glargine, showed slightly reduced affinity for IR-B (twofold) compared to native insulin. In stimulating DNA synthesis, A0:R glargine was slightly less potent compared to insulin or glargine. This result ultimately confirms the previous report that A0:R glargine has a lower potency in mitogenic assays compared to glargine. This glargine analogue thus could be a potential lead compound for drug design and development for the treatment of diabetes.     

Insulin substitution: new insulins, new modes of delivery

The demonstrated role of the tight control of hyperglycaemia for the prevention of long-term diabetic complications has reoriented the goals of insulin supply toward the search for restoration of the effects of physiological insulin secretion rather than the simple survival of insulin deficient patients and the reduction in the number of daily insulin injections to be performed. Normal blood glucose control requires the availability of a fast-acting insulin therapy at meal time in order to reduce hyperglycaemic excursions and a basal insulin therapy able to stabilize blood glucose between meals. Reduction of induced hypoglycaemic risk represents the secondary objective beside the main goal of avoiding hyperglycaemia. Fast-acting analogues, by a faster dissociation of their hexameric conformation after their injection or infusion in subcutaneous tissue, reduce post-meal hyperglycaemia, while their shortened duration of action versus regular insulin minimizes late post-absorptive risk of hypoglycaemia. Long-acting analogues, by their precipitation in subcutaneous tissue or their slowly reversible binding to albumin, provide a benefit on blood glucose stability versus NPH or zinc insulins. Continuous insulin therapy using pumps offers both a better blood glucose stability than multiple daily injections and a broader flexibility in life mode. Using the peritoneal route by implantable pumps is a mean to improve blood glucose stability in poorly controlled patients in spite of optimized subcutaneous insulin therapy. The development of glucose sensors provides reinforced information on blood glucose, versus self-monitoring by capillary blood measurements, that contributes to a better adaptation of insulin therapy. First trials of connections between blood glucose data and insulin delivery open a perspective toward glucose-modulated insulin therapy, at least in periods outside meals, leading to first models of semi-automated artificial endocrine pancreas. The alternative of a cellular insulin supply by pancreas or islet transplantation looked promising during recent years, but lack of transplants and adverse events related to immune suppression limit their use to very specific cases where benefit/risk ratio is positive.     

Role of Insulin Signaling in Maintaining Energy Homeostasis

ObjectiveTo examine the role that insulin signaling plays in modulating metabolic functions involving both peripheral and hypothalamic systems.MethodsWe review the literature regarding insulin signaling as it relates to energy homeostasis.ResultsInsulin signaling in the periphery is known to affect hepatic glucose production and glucose uptake in muscle and adipose tissue. In the brain, insulin is involved in a variety of signaling pathways that control positive and negative aspects of food intake and energy metabolism. Disruption of insulin signaling can affect key cellular pathways that serve to maintain energy balance and glucose homeostasis, which can then lead to insulin resistance and progression toward various metabolic disorders, including cardiovascular disease, obesity, and type 2 diabetes. The use of exogenous insulin as therapy for patients with type 2 diabetes is traditionally associated with increases in weight.ConclusionAn enhanced understanding of how these insulin signaling pathways function may provide answers about how to control weight gain associated with exogenous insulin use. Pharmacologic agents, such as the long-acting insulin analogues and particularly insulin detemir, that may reduce these weight effects hold considerable advantage. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:373-380)     

Proliferative effects of insulin analogues on mammary epithelial cells

Structural modification of insulin results in the generation of insulin analogues that show altered binding affinities to the insulin receptor and/or IGF-I receptor. As a consequence these insulin analogues may have increased mitogenic potency. Nine benign or malignant human mammary epithelial cells, which show different insulin receptor and IGF-I receptor expression patterns, were studied regarding mitogenicity of insulin and insulin analogues. Only insulin glargine showed a significantly higher proliferative effect on MCF-7 breast cancer cells compared to regular insulin among a panel of short- or long-acting insulin analogues, that are in clinical use.     

Rapid-Acting Insulin Analogues in Basal-Bolus Regimens in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

ObjectiveTo compare rapid-acting insulin analogues with regular human insulin in terms of hemoglobin A_1c, hypoglycemia, and insulin dose when used in a basal-bolus regimen in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus.MethodsMEDLINE and congress proceedings were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing pran- dial insulins in a basal-bolus regimen in adults or children/ adolescents with type 1 diabetes. Studies in pregnancy, ob- servational studies, studies that compared premixed insulin or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion/insulin pumps, and studies where the basal insulin was also changed were excluded. Only studies reporting baseline-endpoint change in insulin dose, or baseline and/or endpoint values, were included.ResultsTwenty-eight studies were identified (insulin glulisine, 4; insulin aspart, 7; insulin lispro, 17). Twenty- five studies compared a rapid-acting insulin analogue with regular human insulin, and 3 trials compared 2 rapid-acting insulin analogues. Overall, rapid-acting insulin analogues in a basal-bolus regimen provided similar or greater im- provements in glycemic control than regular human insulin at similar insulin doses, as well as a lower incidence of hypoglycemia.ConclusionsResults of the studies identified in this literature review indicate that a basal-bolus regimen with prandial rapid-acting insulin analogue provides advan- tages over basal-bolus regimens using prandial regular hu- man insulin, providing improvements in glycemic control comparable to those obtained with regular human insulin, as well as a lower incidence of hypoglycemia. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:486-505)     

The role of rapid-acting insulin analogues and inhaled insulin in type 2 diabetes mellitus

sBackground:The availability of rapid-acting insulin analogues and inhaled insulin gives clinicians additional treatmentoptions in the management of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). Combining rapid-acting insulin analogues with basal insulin can more closely mimic physiologic insulin release to maximize glycemic control.Objective:The objective of this article was to discuss the role of rapid-acting insulin analogues and inhaled insulin inthe treatment of patients with type 2 DM.Methods:Materials for this article were obtained through an online search of MEDLINE/PubMed and Google(1996-2006) using the search terms bolus insulin, postprandial, rapid-acting insulin analogues, titration, hypoglycemia, glycemic control, inhaled insulin, and insulins lispro, aspart, and glulisine.Results:Glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) levels and number of all hypoglycemic episodes were similar in patients withtype 2 DM taking either mealtime rapid-acting insulin analogues or regular human insulin (RHI). Rapid-acting insulins have been successfully used in basal-bolus regimens with a variety of long- and intermediate-acting insulins, as well as with oral hypoglycemic agents. Injectable rapid-acting insulin analogues markedly decreased postprandial glucose (PPG) levels compared with RHI. Better reduction in PPG levels may be key to achieving target A1C levels in some patients, but long-term outcome studies are needed to assess whether lowering PPG levels decreases cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 DM. Inhaled insulin may be an option for patients who cannot inject insulin, but route of administration and dosing issues limit its use in many patients. The effect of inhaled insulin on PPG is unclear at this time.Conclusions:Although rapid-acting insulin analogues are effective in the management of patients with type 2 DM, the limited numbers of studies have yet to demonstrate that these agents have any significant long-term advantage compared with RHI. In addition, they cost more than RHI. Further studies are needed to compare the efficacy of the rapid-acting insulin analogues, to compare the different dosing regimens used with mealtime insulin administration, and to ascertain if the decrease in PPG levels seen with the use of rapid-acting insulin analogues translates into improved glycemic control and perhaps even a reduction in cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 DM. (Insulin. 2007;2:61-67) Copyright 2007 Excerpta Medica, Inc.     

Optimal initiation of insulin in type 2 diabetes

Treatment goals for glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes are often not achieved or are difficult to maintain as the disease progresses. Too often, insulin therapy is either delayed or is suboptimal. We discuss how the introduction of new insulin analogs may help overcome some of the barriers to insulin use. If combination therapy with oral agents does not achieve glycemic control, the addition of a once-daily intermediate- or long-acting insulin is a simple and highly effective strategy for initiating insulin. If glycemic control is still not achieved, a short- or rapid-acting insulin may be needed prior to meals (basal-prandial approach). A patient's baseline glycosylated hemoglobin (A1C) can guide whether glycemic control can be achieved with basal insulin or will require basal-prandial replacement. In addition to A1C, a patient's age, lifestyle, competence, personal preferences, and comorbidities can be used to help determine the choice of insulin therapy.     

Biotechnological and administration innovations in insulin therapy

The importance of the intensive control of blood glucose in patients with diabetes has been well documented in several large scale studies. Attempts to attain strict glucose control when managing diabetes have traditionally utilized daily subcutaneous injections of human insulin. This strategy has offered improvements in glycaemic control but is unable to replicate fully the normal diurnal plasma profile of endogenous human insulin. Advances in protein engineering techniques have, however, resulted in the formulation of a number of insulin analogues that offer more desirable properties of absorption from the subcutaneous depot and hence improved insulin profiles in patients with diabetes. Concurrent to the development of insulin analogues, devices to deliver insulin either subcutaneously or by other routes have also advanced. These novel delivery strategies are also likely to contribute to improved glycaemic control for patients with diabetes in the future.     

Actual treatment with insulin in children and adolescents with diabetes type 1

A significant progress in the therapy of type 1 diabetes has been achieved. This was mainly because glucometers are now introduced in the majority of patients, better pens for insulin injections are now available. A progress was done in the methods of education and insulin analogues like Humalog were introduced. Therefore it is now possible to achieve a better metabolic compensation because of a more physiologic insulin action. A further progress is the introduction of long acting analogues and personal insulin pumps for the therapy. There are a lot of examinations about the epidemiology and prophylaxis of diabetes.     

Use of recombinant human hyaluronidase to accelerate rapid insulin analogue absorption: experience with subcutaneous injection and continuous infusion

ObjectiveTo discuss clinical studies in which recombinant human hyaluronidase (rHuPH20) was used to increase insulin dispersion and accelerate its absorption.MethodsWe reviewed 10 pertinent clinical studies, 8 of which had data available.ResultsIn 4 euglycemic clamp studies, coinjection of rHuPH20 consistently yielded acceleration of insulin absorption, providing twice the insulin exposure during the first hour, greater and earlier peak exposure, and half the exposure beyond 2 hours after injection. Insulin-action profiles were similarly accelerated, with a 15-minute faster onset of insulin action and a 45-minute shorter duration of action for each of the 3 commercial rapid-acting insulin analogues. Infusion aspart insulin formulated with rHuPH20 also accelerated insulin absorption and action over the infusion set life when delivered by insulin pump. Administration of rHuPH20 reduced the inconsistency of insulin absorption and action profiles attributable to 3 factors—lack of reproducibility after identical injections, differences across insulin dose ranges, and changes over infusion site life. The rHuPH20-facilitated ultrafast profile consistently reduced hyperglycemic excursions both in injections immediately preceding liquid test meals and in bolus infusions immediately before solid test meals. rHuPH20-facilitated insulin administration has been well tolerated, with safety and tolerability similar to those with the comparator insulin alone.ConclusionrHuPH20 accelerates insulin-action profiles to an extent comparable to the difference between rapid-acting insulin analogue profiles and those of regular insulin. Studies are currently under way to characterize the effect on diabetes management end points (including hemoglobin A₁, blood glucose, and rates of hyperglycemia) of insulin analogues coformulated with rHuPH20 for treatment of both type 1 and type 2 diabetes. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:914-921)     

Insulin analogues: action profiles beyond glycaemic control

A variety of studies have documented significant improvements in the treatment of type 1 and 2 diabetes after the introduction of artificial insulins. This review gives an overview of insulin analogues which are currently approved for therapeutical use. Clinical data regarding the efficiency to control blood glucose level as well as improving HbA1c level in comparison to conventional insulin preparations in type 1 and 2 diabetic patients are summarized. Furthermore, special features of insulin analogues regarding their signalling properties are discussed with focus on the proliferative effects of insulin glargine as well as some recent data of insulin detemir.     

Degludec,una nueva insulina basal de acción ultra-lenta para el tratamiento de la diabetes tipo 1 y 2: avances en investigación clínica

Degludec is the most recent molecule of the ultra-long-acting basal insulin analogues approved for human use. It forms soluble multihexamers which after subcutaneous injection are converted into monomers, and are thus slowly and continuously absorbed into the bloodstream. This absorption mechanism confers degludec an ultra-long and stable action profile, with no concentration peaks. This paper discusses the most recent studies in patients with type 1 and 2 diabetes mellitus, which showed degludec to be non inferior in decreasing HbA1c, ensuring optimum glycemic control similar to that achieved with insulin glargine or detemir. Degludec also had an improved safety profile, as it was associated to a significantly lower rate of nocturnal hypoglycemia in both types of diabetes and to a potentially lower overall hypoglycemia rate in type 2 DM. Degludec also opens the possibility to use more flexible regimens.