Codon recognition in polypeptide chain termination: site directed crosslinking of termination codon to Escherichia coli release factor 2.

An RNA synthesized in vitro was positioned on the Escherichia coli ribosome at the P site with tRNAala, and with a termination codon, UAA, as the next codon in the A site. Such a complex bound stoichiometric amounts of release factor 2 (RF-2); a corresponding RNA with UAC in place of UAA was not a template for the factor. An RNA containing 4-thio-UAA in place of the UAA supported binding of RF-2, and this has allowed site-directed crosslinking from the first position of the termination codon to answer two long standing questions about the termination of protein biosynthesis, the position of the termination codon and its proximity to the release factor during codon recognition. An RF-2.mRNA crosslinked product was detected, indicating the release factor and the termination codon are in close physical contact during the codon recognition event of termination. The 4-thio-U crosslinked also to the ribosome but only to the 30S subunit, and the proteins and the rRNA site concerned were identified. RF-2 decreased significantly the crosslinking to the ribosomal components, but no new crosslink sites were found. If the stop codon was deliberately displaced from the decoding site by one codon's length then a different pattern of crosslinking in particular to the rRNA resulted. These observations are consistent with a model of codon recognition by RF-2 at the decoding site, without a major shift in position of the codon.     

蛋白质生物合成的第四步：翻译终止后复合物的解体

蛋白质合成过程一般被归纳为由合成的起始、肽链的延伸和合成的终止组成的三步曲 . 然而,随着对核糖体再循环因子 (ribosome recycling factor , RRF) 在蛋白质合成过程中作用的深入研究,人们提出了蛋白质生物合成应是四步曲, 这第四步就是翻译终止后核糖体复合物的解体 , 也就是通常说的核糖体循环再利用 . 简要地介绍了翻译终止后复合物解体的可能机制：核糖体再循环因子和蛋白质合成延伸因子 G 在核糖体上协同作用催化这一过程的完成 .     

On the role of the termination factor RF-2 and the 16S RNA in protein synthesis

In the translational termination step of protein synthesis the three termination codons UAA, UAG or UGA are recognized by so-called release or termination factors. The release factor RF-1 interacts with UAG and UAA whereas RF-2 is specific for UGA and UAA. Two mechanisms concerning the termination event have been discussed so far: recognition of the termination codon by the protein in a tRNA-like manner or double-strand formation between the codon and the 3' end of the 16S rRNA which is stabilized by the termination factor. Using equilibrium dialysis we show that 40% of the ribosomes can bind UGAA in an RF-2-dependent manner. The stability with the correct combination RF-2-UGA is tenfold higher as compared to the wrong termination codon UAG. We confirm prior findings that the termination factor RF-2 is bound to the A-site of the ribosome. In addition to the ribosomal proteins L2, L10, L7/L12 and L20 of the large subunit and S6 and S18 of the small subunit, the 16S rRNA became labelled when radioactive UGA was crosslinked to the ribosome in the presence of RF-2. Our data support a mechanism of termination in which a double strand between the termination codon and the 3' end of the 16S rRNA is formed as the starting event. The resulting RNA-RNA double strand in turn may be recognized and stabilized by the termination factor.     

The ribosomal binding domain of the Escherichia coli release factors. Modification of tyrosine in the N-terminal domain of ribosomal protein L11 affects release factors 1 and 2 differentially

Ribosomal protein L11 is one of only two ribosomal proteins significantly iodinated when Escherichia coli 50 S subunits are modified by immobilized lactoperoxidase, and the major target has been shown previously to be tyrosine at position 7 in the N-terminal domain. This modification reduces in vitro termination activity with release factor (RF)-1 by 70-90%, but RF-2 activity is less affected (30-50%). The loss of activity parallels incorporation of iodine into the subunit. The 50 S subunits from L11-lacking strains of bacteria have highly elevated activity with RF-2 and low activity with RF-1. The iodination does not affect RF-2 activity but reduces the RF-1 activity further. Ribosomal proteins, L2, L6, and L25, are significantly labeled in L11-lacking ribosomes in contrast to the control 50 S subunits. L11 has been modified in isolation and incorporated back efficiently into L11-lacking ribosomes. This L11, iodinated also predominantly at Tyr 7, is unable to restore RF-1 activity to L11-lacking ribosomes in contrast to mock-iodinated protein. These results suggest the involvement of the N terminus of L11 in the binding domain of the bacterial release factors and indicate that there are subtle differences in how the two factors interact with the ribosome.     

Sequence comparison of new prokaryotic and mitochondrial members of the polypeptide chain release factor family predicts a five-domain model for release factor structure.

We have recently reported the cloning and sequencing of the gene for the mitochondrial release factor mRF-1. mRF-1 displays high sequence similarity to the bacterial release factors RF-1 and RF-2. A database search for proteins resembling these three factors revealed high similarities to two amino acid sequences deduced from unassigned genomic reading frames in Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis. The amino acid sequence derived from the Bacillus reading frame is 47% identical to E.coli and Salmonella typhimurium RF-2, strongly suggesting that it represents B.subtilis RF-2. Our comparison suggests that the expression of the B.subtilis gene is, like that of the E.coli and S. typhimurium RF-2 genes, autoregulated by a stop codon dependent +1 frameshift. A comparison of prokaryotic and mitochondrial release factor sequences, including the putative B.subtilis RF-2, leads us to propose a five-domain model for release factor structure. Possible functions of the various domains are discussed.     

Comparative characterization of release factor RF-3 genes of Escherichia coli, Salmonella typhimurium, and Dichelobacter nodosus.

The termination of protein synthesis in bacteria requires two codon-specific release factors, RF-1 and RF-2. A gene for a third factor, RF-3, that stimulates the RF-1 and RF-2 activities has been isolated from the gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli and Dichelobacter nodosus. In this work, we isolated the RF-3 gene from Salmonella typhimurium and compared the three encoded RF-3 proteins by immunoblotting and intergeneric complementation and suppression. A murine polyclonal antibody against E. coli RF-3 reacted with both S. typhimurium and D. nodosus RF-3 proteins. The heterologous RF-3 genes complemented a null RF-3 mutation of E. coli regardless of having different sequence identities at the protein level. Additionally, multicopy expression of either of these RF-3 genes suppressed temperature-sensitive RF-2 mutations of E. coli and S. typhimurium by restoring adequate peptide chain release. These findings strongly suggest that the RF-3 proteins of these gram-negative bacteria share common structural and functional domains necessary for RF-3 activity and support the notion that RF-3 interacts functionally and/or physically with RF-2 during translation termination.     

The Escherichia coli ribosomal protein L11 suppresses release factor 2 but promotes the release factor 1 activities in peptide chain termination

The incubation of the 50 S ribosomal subunits of Escherichia coli with 1.5 M LiCl yields 1.5c core particles depleted in 14 proteins and inactive in peptide chain termination. In codon-dependent peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis the release factor 1 (RF-1)-induced reaction essentially depends on both L11 and L16 whereas the release factor 2 (RF-2)-induced reaction is depressed by L11 and stimulated by L16. Omission of L11 results in a several-fold increase in the specific activity of the RF-2. Functional complexes are formed with RF-2 at an apparent Km (dissociation constant) for the termination codon 5-fold lower than with reconstituted ribosomes containing L11; the Vmax for the hydrolysis is unchanged. L11 suppresses this effect when added to the core at close to molar equivalence. In contrast, RF-1 has a very low activity if ribosomes lack L11 and this can be restored by titration of L11 back to the core. This is the first example of a differential or an opposite effect of a ribosomal component on the activities of the two release factors, and the studies suggest that L11 has a critical role in the binding domain for the two factors.     

肽链释放因子识别终止密码子的机制

肽链释放因子(polypeptide release factor, RF)是参与细胞内蛋白质合成终止过程中新生肽链释放的一组重要的蛋白质,包括两类,即第一类肽链释放因子(classⅠrelease factor, RFⅠ)和第二类肽链释放因子(classⅡrelease factor, RFⅡ).关于第一类肽链释放因子识别终止密码子的机制和功能位点是目前分子细胞生物学领域的一个研究热点,第二类肽链释放因子作为一类GTP酶,在第一类肽链释放因子识别终止密码子和肽链释放过程中的协同作用也备受关注.近些年来,通过构建体内和体外的测活体系,对第一类肽链释放因子识别终止密码子的机制的研究取得了一些进展,提出了多种假说和模型,尤其是对第一类肽链释放因子的晶体结构及两类肽链释放因子复合体的空间结构的研究,为揭示真核生物细胞内蛋白质合成终止机制提供了直接的证据.     

Frameshifting at the internal stop codon within the mRNA for bacterial release factor-2 on eukaryotic ribosomes

A translational frameshift is necessary in the synthesis of Escherichia coli release factor 2 (RF-2) to bypass an in-frame termination codon within the coding sequence. High-efficiency frameshifting around this codon can occur on eukaryotic ribosomes as well as prokaryotic ribosomes. This was determined from the relative efficiency of translation of RF-2 RNA compared with that for the other release factor RF-1, which lacks the in-frame premature stop codon. Since the termination product is unstable an absolute measure of the efficiency of frameshifting has not been possible. A gene fusion between trpE and RF-2 was carried out to give a stable termination product as well as the frameshift product, thereby allowing a direct determination of frameshifting efficiency. The extension of RF-2 RNA near its start codon with a fragment of the trpE gene, while still allowing high efficiency frameshifting on prokaryotic ribosomes, surprisingly gives a different estimate of frameshifting on the eukaryotic ribosomes than that obtained with RF-2 RNA alone. This paradox may be explained by long distance context effects on translation rates in the frameshift region created by the trpE sequences in the gene fusion, and may reflect that pausing and translation rate are fundamental factors in determining the efficiency of frameshifting.     

Use of tRNA suppressors to probe regulation of Escherichia coli release factor 2

It has been suggested that Escherichia coli release factor 2 (RF-2) translation is autoregulated. Mature RF-2 protein can terminate its own nascent synthesis at an intragenic, in-phase UGA codon, or alternatively, a +1 frameshift can occur that leads to completion of the RF-2 polypeptide. Translational termination presumably increases with RF-2 concentration, providing negative regulatory feedback. We now show, in lacZ/RF-2 fusions, that translation of a UAG codon at the position of the UGA competes with frameshifting, which proves one postulate of the translational autoregulatory model. We also identify a nearby sequence that is required for high-frequency frameshifting and suggest a constraint for the codon preceding the shift point. Both these sequences are incorporated into a model for frameshifting. Our measurements allow us to compute the relative rates in vivo of these reactions: release factor action, frameshifting and tRNA selection at an amber codon.     

Frameshift autoregulation in the gene for Escherichia coli release factor 2: partly functional mutants result in frameshift enhancement.

The regulation of release factor 2 (RF-2) synthesis in Escherichia coli occurs, at least in part, through autoregulatory feedback exerted at a unique frameshifting step required during RF-2 translation. We have constructed fusions between the genes for RF-2 and E. coli trpE which make direct measurement of frameshifting efficiency possible since both products of regulation, the termination product and the frameshift product, are stable. The addition of purified RF-2 to in vitro expressions of these fusion genes was found to result in decreased frameshifting and increased termination at the regulation site. The frame-shifted trpE-RF-2 products synthesized from these fusions are unique with respect to their functional release factor activities; when tested in assays of two intermediate steps of translational termination, they were found to be partially active for the function of ribosome binding, but inactive for peptidyl-tRNA hydrolysis (release). These are the first examples of release factor mutants selectively active for only one of these function. In vivo these chimeric proteins promote large increases in frameshifting at the RF-2 frameshift region, thereby reversing normal negative autoregulatory feedback and instead supporting fully efficient frameshifting in their own synthesis. This activity provides new evidence for the importance of ribosomal pausing in directing efficient frameshifting at the RF-2 frameshift region.     

Requirement for ribosome-releasing factor for the release of ribosomes at the termination codon.

With the use of 3H-labeled R 17 amB2 phage RNA having an UAG codon at the seventh triplet of the coat cistron, release of the RNA from ribosomes at the termination codon was studied. The ribosome-releasing factor previously described was shown to stimulate the process of mRNA release at the termination factor (RF-1). GTP was required for this process and guanosine 5'-(beta,gamma-methylene)triphosphate could not replace GTP. No apparent change of size of R 17 RNA was observed during the release of the R 17 RNA from the ribosomes. The ribosome-releasing factor is distinct from the known termination codon-specific factor such as RF-1.     

Function of initiation factor 1 in the binding and release of initiation factor 2 from ribosomal initiation complexes in Escherichia coli.

1. Studies on the function of initiation factor 1 (IF-1) in the formation of 30 S initiation complexes have been carried out. IF-1 appears to prevent the dissociation of initiation factor 2 (IF-2) from the 30 S initiation complex. The factor has no effect on either the initial binding of IF-2 nor does it increase the amount of IF-2 dependent fMet-tRNA and GTP bound to the 30 S subunit. Bound fMet-tRNA remains stable to sucrose gradient centrifugation even in the absence of IF-1. 2. It is postulated that the presence of IF-2 on the 30 S complex is necessary so that at the time of junction with the 50 S subunit to form a 70 S complex, the 70 S-dependent GTPase activity of IF-2 can hydrolyze GTP. This hydrolysis provides a means by which GTP can be removed to facilitate formation of a 70 S initiation complex active in peptidyl transfer. In support of this postulate, it was observed that 30 S initiation complexes formed in the absence of IF-1 could be depleted of their complexes were still able to accept 50 S subunits to form 70 S complexes which could still donate fMet-tRNA into peptide linkages. These results indicate that 30 S complexes lacking GTP do not require IF-2 for formation of active 70 S complexes. 3. IF-1, which is required to prevent dissociation of IF-2 from the 30 S initiation complex, is also required for release of IF-2 from ribosomes following 70 S initiation complex formation. The mechanisms of the release of IF-2 has been studied in greater detail. Evidence is presented which rules out the presence of a stable IF-2 GDP complex on the surface of the 70 S ribosome following GTP hydrolysis and of any exchange reactions between IF-1 and guanine nucleotides necessary for effecting the release of IF-2. IF-2 remains on the 70 S initiation complexes after release of guanine nucleotides and can be liberated solely by addition of IF-1.     

Recognition of translational termination signals

Ribosomes can specifically shift at certain codons so that the mRNA is read in two different reading frames. To determine if frameshifting occurs at the level of termination, polymers of defined sequence containing AUG, a coding sequence and an in- or out-of-phase nonsense codon were used to bind a termination substrate or to program synthesis and release of dipeptides in a highly purified in vitro translation system. fMet-tRNA bound to ribosomes with AUGUAA, AUGUAAn, AUGUUU, AUGUUA or AUGUAn was not a substrate for release factor RF-1. In contrast, AUGU1UAA, AUGU3UAAn, AUGU4UAAn, AUGU5UAAn effected RF-1-dependent release of fMet from ribosomes. This suggests that nonsense codons can stimulate release whether they occur in- or out-of-phase. Addition of exogenous UAA and RF-1 stimulated release with all oligonucleotides tested. Propagation restricted the RF-1-dependent recognition of out-of-phase nonsense codons but did not restrict recognition of in-phase UAA in AUGU3UAAn. Release of dipeptides from ribosomes programmed with AUGU4UAAn occurred without EF-G and with a mutant lacking EF-G activity, suggesting that out-of-phase termination can occur prior to translocation outside the ribosomal A-site. We propose that the ribosome X RF complex is required to complete proteins, but is also able to frameshift at a nonsense codon resulting in occasional out-of-phase termination of protein synthesis.     

Termination of protein synthesis

One of three mRNA codons — UAA, UAG and UGA — is used to signal to the elongating ribosome that translation should be terminated at this point. Upon the arrival of the stop codon at the ribosomal acceptor(A)-site, a protein release factor (RF) binds to the ribosome resulting in the peptidyl transferase centre of the ribosome switching to a hydrolytic function to remove the completed polypeptide chain from the peptidyl-tRNA bound at the adjacent ribosomal peptidyl(P)-site. In this review recent advances in our understanding of the mechanism of termination in the bacteriumEscherichia coli will be summarised, paying particular attention to the roles of 16S ribosomal RNA and the release factors RF-1, RF-2 and RF-3 in stop codon recognition. Our understanding of the translation termination process in eukaryotes is much more rudimentary with the identity of the single eukaryotic release factor (eRF) still remaining elusive. Finally, several examples of how the termination mechanism can be subverted either to expand the genetic code (e.g. selenocysteine insertion at UGA codons) or to regulate the expression of mammalian retroviral or plant viral genomes will be discussed.     

Reduced action of polypeptide release factors induces mRNA cleavage and tmRNA tagging at stop codons in Escherichia coli

Certain C-terminal sequences of nascent peptide cause an efficient protein tagging by tmRNA system at stop codons in Escherichia coli. Here, we demonstrate that both mRNA cleavage and tmRNA tagging occur at UAG stop codon recognized specifically by polypeptide release factor 1 (RF-1) when the activity of RF-1 is reduced by a mutation in the prfA gene without requirement of particular C-terminal sequences of nascent peptide. The tmRNA tagging and mRNA cleavage in the prfA mutant were eliminated when the wild-type RF-1 but not RF-2 was supplied from plasmid. In addition, depletion of either RF-1 or RF-2 induces endonucleolytic cleavage and tmRNA tagging at UAG or UGA stop codons respectively. We conclude that ribosome stalling at the cognate stop codon caused by reduced activity or expression of RF-1 or RF-2 is responsible for mRNA cleavage. The present data along with our previous studies strongly suggest that ribosome stalling leads to endonucleolytic cleavage of mRNA in general resulting in non-stop mRNA and that the 3' end of non-stop mRNA is probably only target for the tmRNA system.     

In vitro selection of RNA aptamer against Escherichia coli release factor 1

A pool of 84-nt RNAs containing a randomized sequence of 50 nt was selected against gel-immobilized Escherichia coli release factor 1 (RF-1) responsible for translation termination at amber (UAG) stop codon. The strongest aptamer (class II-1) obtained from 43 clones bound to RF-1, but not to UAA/UGA-targeting RF-2, with Kd = 30+/-6 nM (SPR). A couple of unpaired hairpin domains in the aptamer were suggested as the sites of attachment of RF-1. By binding to and hence inhibiting the action of RF-1 specifically or bio-orthogonally, aptamer class II-1 enhanced the amber suppression efficiency in the presence of an anticodon-adjusted (CUA) suppressor tRNA without practically damaging the protein translation machinery of the cell-free extract of E. coli, as confirmed by the translation of amber-mutated (gfp(amber141) or gfp(amber178)) and wild-type (gfp(wild)) genes of GFP.     

Enhanced phosphoserine insertion during Escherichia coli protein synthesis via partial UAG codon reassignment and release factor 1 deletion

Genetically encoded phosphoserine incorporation programmed by the UAG codon was achieved by addition of engineered elongation factor and an archaeal aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase to the normal Escherichia coli translation machinery (Park et al., 2011) Science 333, 1151) [2]. However, protein yield suffers from expression of the orthogonal phosphoserine translation system and competition with release factor 1 (RF-1). In a strain lacking RF-1, phosphoserine phosphatase, and where seven UAG codons residing in essential genes were converted to UAA, phosphoserine incorporation into GFP and WNK4 was significantly elevated, but with an accompanying loss in cellular fitness and viability.     

Frameshifting by eukaryotic ribosomes during expression of Escherichia coli release factor 2.

Normal translation of the gene for E. coli release factor 2 (RF-2) is characterized by a +1 frameshift event that occurs with 30-50% efficiency. Frameshifting on synthetic RF-2 mRNA by eukaryotic ribosomes has also been observed, even though they lack the capability to interact with the frameshift signal in the same manner as prokaryotic ribosomes. We have mutagenized the sequence of the RF-2 gene to eliminate the need for a frameshift, thereby allowing frameshifting efficiency to be measured by direct comparison of RF-2 production from the mutant with production from the wild-type. Measurements using this approach confirm that frameshifting by rabbit reticulocyte lysate ribosomes occurs at the frameshift region, but with a limited efficiency of approximately 0.4%.