应用酶联免疫吸附试验检测马铃薯卷叶病毒

以辣根过氧化物酶标记马铃薯卷叶病毒抗体,采用双抗体夹心ELISA方法鉴定了马铃薯和洋酸浆的茎、叶、根及马铃薯块茎中的马铃薯卷叶病毒(Potato Leafroll Virus,PLRV),结果表明,对提纯的PLRV可测出的最低浓度为25ng/ml,当包被抗体浓度为40μg/ml、酶标记抗体稀释度为1/120时,可测出马铃薯茎、叶和根汁液中的PLRV,感染PLRV的洋酸浆茎、叶和根汁液的消光值,均比无病对照者高二倍以上,虽然感染PLRV的马铃薯休眠块茎维管束组织汁液的消光值高于无病毒对照,且脐部维管束组织消光值高于顶端,但测定打破休眠的感病块茎顶端维管束组织的阳性结果更为可靠和明显。     

Factors affecting the detection of potato leafroll virus in potato foliage by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

Using antiserum globulins that reacted only weakly with plant materials, potato leafroll virus (PLRV) at 10 ng/ml was detected consistently by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The reaction with PLRV particles was slightly impaired in potato leaf extracts that were diluted less than 10^-1 but not at greater dilutions. Antiserum globulins that reacted more strongly with plant materials could be used satisfactorily for coating microtitre plates but were unsuitable for conjugating with enzyme. The detection end-point of PLRV, in leaf sap of potato cv. Cara plants grown from infected tubers in the glasshouse, was about 10^-2 and the virus was reliably detected in extracts of composite samples of one infected and 15 virus-free leaves. PLRV concentration was much less in extracts of roots or stolons than in leaf extracts. The virus was detected in infected leaves of all 27 cultivars tested. PLRV was readily detectable 2 wk before symptoms of secondary infection developed in field-grown plants of cv. Cara and Maris Piper and remained so for at least 5 wk. Its concentration was slightly greater in old than in young leaves and was similar to that in glasshouse-grown plants. In field-grown plants of cv. Maris Piper with primary infection, PLRV was detected in tip leaves 21–42 days after lower leaves were inoculated by aphids; in some shoots it later reached a concentration, in tip leaves, similar to that in leaves with secondary infection. Symptoms of primary infection developed in the young leaves of some infected shoots but were inconspicuous and were not observed until at least a week after PLRV was detected by ELISA.     

Spread of potato leafroll virus is decreased from plants of potato clones in which virus accumulation is restricted

Tubers of eight potato clones infected with potato leafroll luteovirus (PLRV) were planted as ‘infectors’ in a field crop grown, at Invergowrie, of virus-free potato cv. Maris Piper in 1989. The mean PLRV contents of the infector clones, determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) of leaf tissue, ranged from c. 65 to 2400 ng/g leaf. Myzus persicae colonised the crop shortly after shoot emergence in late May and established large populations on all plants, exceeding 2000/plant by 27 June. Aphid infestations were controlled on 30 June by insecticide sprays. Aphid-borne spread of PLRV from plants of the infector clones was assessed in August by ELISA of foliage samples from the neighbouring Maris Piper ‘receptors’. Up to 89% infection occurred in receptor plots containing infector clones with high concentrations of PLRV. Spread was least (as little as 6%) in plots containing infectors in which PLRV concentrations were low. Primary PLRV infection in guard areas of the crop away from infectors was 4%. Some receptor plants became infected where no leaf contact was established with the infectors, suggesting that some virus spread may have been initiated by aphids walking across the soil.     

Time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay of potato virus M with monoclonal antibodies

Mouse monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for potato virus M (PVM) were prepared and the properties of three of them were studied. MAb M4C1 is IgG2b, it binds with high affinity to PVM coat protein, to purified virus preparations and recognises PVM in infected potato leaves and tubers. MAb M6D5 is IgG2a and also reacts with PVM coat protein, purified PVM and with PVM in potato leaf and tuber extracts. In double-antibody sandwich ELISA (DAS ELISA) MAbs M4C1 and M6D5 reacted with all 17 PVM isolates tested. MAb M7 is IgG2b and recognises PVM only in indirect dot ELISA on nitrocellulose filters and viral coat protein on Western blots. MAbs against PVM were used as capture antibodies and europium-labelled MAbs as conjugates in time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay (EuTRFIA). The standard EuTRFIA curve of PVM detection is approximately linear over a range of PVM concentrations from 0.5 ng/ml to 1000 ng/ml. The lowest PVM concentration detectable in EuTRFIA was 0.5 ng/ml and correspondingly 6 ng/ml in DAS ELISA. The use of the europium chelate label allows PVM detection in potato leaf and tuber sap at dilutions greater than 10^--⁴ with very low background fluorescence. EuTRFIA with MAbs, with either one or two incubations is about 10–20 times more sensitive for PVM detection than is DAS ELISA. PVM and PVX, mixed with healthy potato tuber sap, were simultaneously tested in a single sample at concentrations lower than 10 ng/ml by double-label TRFIA using europium-labelled MAbs to PVM and samarium-labelled MAbs to PVX.     

Quantitative studies on the uptake and retention of potato leafroll virus by aphids in laboratory and field conditions

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was adapted for the efficient detection and assay of potato leafroll virus (PLRV) in aphids. Best results were obtained when aphids were extracted in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.0, and the extracts incubated at 37 °C for 1 h before starting the assay. Using batches of 20 green peach aphids (Myzus persicae), about 0.01 ng PLRV/aphid could be detected. The virus could also be detected in single aphids allowed a 1-day acquisition access period on infected potato leaves. The PLRV content of aphids depended on the age of potato source-plants and the position of source leaves on them. It increased with increase in acquisition access period up to 7 days but differed considerably between individual aphids. A maximum of 7 ng PLRV/aphid was recorded but aphids more usually accumulated about 0.2 ng PLRV per day. When aphids were allowed acquisition access periods of 1–3 days, and then caged singly on Physalis floridana seedlings for 3 days, the PLRV content of each aphid, measured subsequently, was not strongly correlated with the infection of P. floridana. The concentration of PLRV in leaf extracts differed only slightly when potato plants were kept at 15, 20, 25 or 30 °C for 1 or 2 wk, but the virus content of aphids kept on leaves at the different temperatures decreased with increase of temperature. PLRV was transmitted readily to P. floridana at all temperatures, but by a slightly smaller proportion of aphids, and after a longer latent period, at 15 °C than at 30 °C. The PLRV content of M. persicae fed on infected potato leaves decreased with increasing time after transfer to turnip (immune to PLRV). The decrease occurred in two phases, the first rapid and the second very slow. In the first phase the decrease was faster, briefer and greater at 25 and 30 °C than at 15 and 20 °C. No evidence was obtained that PLRV multiplies in M. persicae. These results are compatible with a model in which much of the PLRV in aphids during the second phase is in the haemocoele, and transmission is mainly limited by the rate of passage of virus particles from haemolymph to saliva. The potato aphid, Macrosiphum euphorbiae, transmitted PLRV much less efficiently than M. persicae. Its inefficiency as a vector could not be ascribed to failure to acquire or retain PLRV, or to the degradation of virus particles in the aphid. Probably only few PLRV particles pass from the haemolymph to saliva in this species. The virus content of M. euphorbiae collected from PLRV-infected potato plants in the field increased from early June to early July, and then decreased. PLRV was detected both in spring migrants collected from the plants and in summer migrants caught in yellow water-traps. PLRV was also detected in M. persicae collected from infected plants in July and August, and in trapped summer migrants, but their PLRV content was less than that of M. euphorbiae, and in some instances was too small for unequivocal detection.     

Evidence of simple genetic control in potato of ability to restrict potato leaf roll virus concentration in leaves

Summary The concentration of potato leaf roll virus (PLRV), measured by quantitative enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, in foliage of plants of cv Maris Piper and clone G7445(1) with secondary infection was 2,700 ng/g leaf and 120 ng/g leaf, respectively. In experiments to examine the genetic control of their ability to restrict the multiplication of PLRV, reciprocal crosses were made between these two clones. Among 40 genotypes from the progeny of the crosses, about half had a low PLRV concentration in plants with secondary infection and the other half had a high concentration. The possibility of monogenic control of the character that restricts PLRV multiplication in such clones of Solanum tuberosum is discussed.     

Use of Clq enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to detect plant viruses and their serologically different strains

Clq was prepared from bovine serum using a simple method involving repeated dialysis at low ionic strength in the presence of chelating agents (yield c. 3 mg/100 ml serum). It was viable when stored at -18°C for up to 2 months, and at 4°C for at least 10 wk in a storage buffer containing 10% sucrose. When used in Clq ELISA this test was as sensitive as the direct double antibody sandwich form of ELISA (direct ELISA) in detecting purified potato virus Y (PVY), with a limit of detection in both methods of c. 15 ng/ml, and slightly more sensitive in detecting purified cocksfoot mild mosaic virus (CMMV), with limits of detection of c. 15 ng/ml and c. 15–60 ng/ml respectively. Using an antiserum to one strain of each virus, Clq ELISA readily detected strains of PVY, CMMV, Andean potato latent virus (APLV) and barley yellow dwarf virus (BYDV). This included detection of APLV-Hu by APLV-Caj antibodies and CMMV(G) by PMV(S) antibodies, neither of which system gives detection in direct ELISA. Clq ELISA was therefore less specific than direct ELISA in detecting serologically different virus strains. Virus detection by Clq ELISA was inhibited when sap of tobacco, Nicotiana clevelandii and Setaria italica was used at low dilution. Inhibition by N. clevelandii sap was alleviated by using increased concentrations of virus specific antibody to detect APLV and plum pox virus. Also, extracting APLV infective N. clevelandii or CMMV infective S. italica saps in a minimum of buffer, centrifuging at low speed and diluting the supernatant before testing, partially overcame the inhibition. The inhibitory substance(s) in sap may act by preventing the binding of Clq to virus-antibody aggregates. Sap of wheat, oat and barley did not appear to have an inhibitory effect and BYDV was readily detected in naturally infected field grown plants of these species.     

COMPARISON of ANALYTICAL SENSITIVITIES of THREE ENZYME IMMUNOASSAY PROCEDURES FOR the DETECTION of SALMONELLA LIPOPOLYSACCHARIDE

The analytical sensitivities of three different enzyme linked immunoassays (ELISA), two competitive and a capture format were assessed. the assay systems employed monoclonal antibodies to Salmonella lipopolysaccharide (LPS) outer core epitopes to detect crude LPS antigens from Salmonella typhimurium. the most sensitive ELISA was the capture procedure, being capable of detection 1.3 ng/ml of LPS. This technique, however also gave the greatest between-test variation and as a result, the lowest amount that could be detected with a 95% confidence limit was actually 12.8 ng/ml and it took the longest time to perform (3 h, 30 min). A competitive ELISA using limiting monoclonal antibody to compete between solid phase antigen and soluble antigen in the sample, ranked second in sensitivity, and can detect 2.8 and 3.8 ng/ml of LPS when tested with two different monoclonal antibodies. However, because of the slight between test variation, the actual sensitivities that could be detected with a 95% confidence limit were 3.1 and 4.6 ng/ml, respectively. This test takes approximately 1 h and 30 min to perform.
The classical type of competitive assay, employing a labelled antigen, was the least sensitive being capable of detecting 5.8 ng/ml if the LPS was conjugated with horseradish peroxidase and 16.0 ng/ml if alkaline phosphatase was used as a label. to account for the between-test variation, the sensitivities with a 95% confidence limit were 8.6 and 18.7 ng/ml for the respective assays, which take 2 h and 15 min to perform.
These sensitivities compare favorably with those published for similar assays, but all of the procedures were judged insufficiently sensitive for direct use on food samples to be tested for the presence of Salmonella species. However, the assays would be quite suitable for demonstration of Salmonella sp. after an enrichment procedure.     

The Effects of Temperature on the Susceptibility of Potato Plants to Infection and Accumulation of Potato Leafroll Virus

Temperature both before and after aphid inoculation with potato leafroll virus (PLRV) greatly influenced the susceptibility of potato plants to infection and virus accumulation, as evaluated with ELISA using cultivars with different ratings for the resistance to PLRV. Pre-incubation at 15 compared to 27 °C increased the susceptibility of plants to infection and a subsequent PLRV accumulation. The virus was detected by ELISA in a greater proportion of plants and reached a higher concentration, when the plants were kept at 27 than at 15 °C after inoculation. The mean ELISA values obtained with PLRV-infected plants in the 15/27 combination of the pre-/post-inoculation temperatures over the period 1—6 wks after inoculation were significantly higher than those in the 27/27, 15/15 and 27/15 treatments, and the values obtained in the 27/27 treatment were significantly higher than those in the 15/15 and 27/15 ones. A hypersensitive-like intolerance reaction to PLRV occurred in the resistant cv. Irga only in the plants kept at 27 °C after inoculation.     

Resistance to potato leafroll luteovirus can be greatly improved by combining two independent types of heritable resistance

Twelve potato clones were exposed to infection by aphids with potato leafroll luteovirus (PLRV) in three field trials in order to assess their resistance to infection. Up to 92% of the plants of some clones became infected, although other clones were relatively resistant to infection and one clone remained virus-free in all three trials. The resistance of the same 12 clones to PLRV multiplication was assessed in glasshouse-grown plant: lants were graft-inoculated and their daughter tubers were used to grow plants with secondary infection. High concentrations of PLRV were found in some clones (c. 1700 ng/g leaf) while in others much less virus accumulated (as little as 60 ng/g leaf). However, clones in which little virus accumulated were not necessarily those which were most resistant to infection in the field, and there was no association between the two types of resistance. Nevertheless, both types of resistance were found in some clones. The clone G8107(1), which remained virus-free in all the field exposure trials, was also the most resistant to PLRV multiplication. The combination of these two types of resistance in cultivars should help to eliminate the spread of PLRV in crops.