The use of GnRH or estradiol to facilitate fixed-time insemination in an MGA-based synchronization regimen in beef cattle

Two experiments were conducted to compare pregnancy rates when GnRH or estradiol were given to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in an MGA-based estrus synchronization program. Crossbred beef cattle were fed melengestrol acetate (MGA, 0.5 mg per day) for 7 days (designated days 0-6, without regard to stage of the estrous cycle) and given cloprostenol (PGF; 500 microg intramuscular (im)) on day 7. In Experiment 1, lactating beef cows (n=140) and pubertal heifers (n=40) were randomly allocated to three groups to receive 100 microg gonadorelin (GnRH), 5 mg estradiol-17beta and 100 mg progesterone (E+P) in canola oil or no treatment (control) on day 0. All cattle were observed for estrus every 12 h from 36 to 96 h after PGF. Cattle in the GnRH group that were detected in estrus 36 or 48 h after PGF were inseminated 12 h later; the remainder were given 100 microg GnRH im 72 h after PGF and concurrently inseminated. Cattle in the E+P group were randomly assigned to receive either 0.5 or 1.0 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) in 2 ml canola oil im 24 h after PGF and were inseminated 30 h later. Cattle in the control group were inseminated 12 h after the first detection of estrus; if not in estrus by 72 h after PGF, they were given 100 microg GnRH im and concurrently inseminated. In the absence of significant differences, all data for heifers and for cows were combined and the 0.5 and 1.0 mg EB groups were combined into a single estradiol group. Estrus rates were 57.6, 57.4 and 60.0% for the GnRH, E+P and control groups, respectively (P=0.95). The mean (+/-S.D.) interval from PGF treatment to estrus was shorter (P<0.001) and less variable (P<0.001) in the E+P group (49.0+/-6.1 h) than in either the GnRH (64.2+/-15.9 h) or control (66.3+/-13.3 h) groups. Overall pregnancy rates were higher (P<0.005) in the GnRH (57.6%) and E+P (55.7%) groups than in the control group (30.0%) as were pregnancy rates to fixed-time AI (47.5, 55.7 and 28.3%, respectively). In Experiment 2, 122 crossbred beef heifers were given either 100 microg GnRH or 2 mg EB and 50 mg progesterone in oil on day 0 and subsequently received either 100 microg GnRH 36 h after PGF and inseminated 14 h later or 1 mg EB im 24 h after PGF and inseminated 28 h later in a 2 x 2 factorial design. Pregnancy rates were not significantly different among groups (41.9, 32.2, 33.3 and 36.7% in GnRH/GnRH, GnRH/EB, EB/GnRH and EB/EB groups, respectively). In conclusion, GnRH or estradiol given to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and ovulation in an MGA-based synchronization regimen resulted in acceptable pregnancy rates to fixed-time insemination.     

The use of estradiol and/or GnRH in a two-dose PGF protocol for breeding management of beef heifers

The objective was to determine reproductive performance following AI in beef heifers given estradiol to synchronize ovarian follicular wave emergence and estradiol or GnRH to synchronize ovulation in a two-dose PGF-based protocol. In Experiment 1, 561 cycling (confirmed by ultrasonography), Angus heifers received 500 microg cloprostenol, i.m. (PGF) twice, 14 days apart (days 0 and 14) and were equally allocated to four groups in a 2 x 2 factorial design. On Day 7, heifers received either 2 mg estradiol benzoate (EB) and 50 mg progesterone (P), i.m. in oil (EBP group) or no treatment (NT group). Half the heifers in each group received 1mg EB, i.m. in oil on Day 15 (24h after the second PGF treatment) with TAI 28 h later (52 h after PGF), and the other half received 100 microg GnRH, i.m. on Day 17 (72 h after PGF) concurrent with TAI. All heifers were observed for estrus twice daily from days 13 to 17; those detected in estrus more than 16 h before scheduled TAI were inseminated 4-16 h later and considered nonpregnant to TAI. Overall pregnancy rate (approximately 35 days after AI) was higher in heifers that received EBP than those that did not (61.6% versus 48.2%, respectively; P < 0.002); but was lower in heifers that received EB after PGF than those that received GnRH (50.0% versus 59.8%; P < 0.02). Although estrus was detected prior to TAI in 77 of 279 heifers (27.6%) treated with EBP (presumably due to induced luteolysis), they were inseminated and 53.2% became pregnant. Overall pregnancy rates were 51.4, 68.3, 45.0, and 55.0% in the NT/GnRH, EBP/GnRH, NT/EB, and EBP/EB groups, respectively (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, 401 cycling, Angus heifers were used. The design was identical to Experiment 1, except that 1.5mg estradiol-17beta (E-17beta) plus 50mg progesterone (E-17betaP) and 1mg E-17beta were used in lieu of EBP and EB, respectively. All heifers receiving E-17beta 24h after the second injection of PGF (NT/E-17beta and E-17betaP/E-17beta) were TAI 28 h later without estrus detection, i.e. 52 h after PGF. Heifers in the other two groups received 100 microg GnRH, i.m. 72 h after PGF and were concurrently TAI; heifers in these two groups that were detected in estrus prior to this time were inseminated 4-12h later and considered nonpregnant to TAI. Estrus rate during the first 72 h after the second PGF treatment was higher (P < 0.05) in the E-17betaP/GnRH group (45.0%; n = 100) than in the NT/GnRH group (16.0%; n = 100), but conception rate following estrus detection and AI was not different (mean, 57.4%; P = 0.50). Overall pregnancy rate was not significantly different among groups (mean, 46.9%; P = 0.32). In summary, the use of EB or E-17beta to synchronize follicular wave emergence and estradiol or GnRH to synchronize ovulation in a two-dose, PGF-based protocol resulted in acceptable fertility to TAI. However, when 2mg EB was used to synchronize follicular wave emergence, early estrus occurred in approximately 28% of heifers, necessitating additional estrus detection. A combination of estrus detection and timed-AI in a two-dose PGF protocol resulted in highly acceptable pregnancy rates.     

Use of a GnRH agonist to prevent the endogenous LH surge and injection of exogenous LH to induce ovulation in heifers superstimulated with FSH: a new model for superovulation

A new protocol for superovulating cattle which allows for control of the timing of ovulation after superstimulation with FSH was developed. The preovulatory LH surge was blocked with the GnRH agonist deslorelin, and ovulation was induced by injection of LH. In Experiment 1, heifers (3-yr-old) were assigned to a control group (Group 1A, n = 4) or a group with deslorelin implants (Group 1B, n = 5). On Day -7, heifers in Group 1A received a progestagen CIDR-B((R))device, while heifers in Group 1B received a CIDR-B((R))device + deslorelin implants. Both groups were superstimulated with twice daily injections of FSH (Folltropin((R))-V): Day 0, 40 mg (80 mg total dose on Day 0); Day 1, 30 mg; Day 2, 20 mg; Day 3, 10 mg. On Day 2, heifers were given PGF (a.m.) and CIDR-B((R)) devices were removed (p.m.). Three heifers in Group 1A had a LH surge and ovulated, whereas neither of these events occurred in Group 1B (with deslorelin implants) heifers. In Experiment 2, heifers (3-yr-old) were assigned to 1 of 4 equal groups (n = 6). On Day -7, heifers in Group 2A received a norgestomet implant, while heifers in Groups 2B, 2C and 2D received norgestomet + deslorelin implants. Heifers were superstimulated with FSH starting on Day 0 as in Experiment 1. On Day 2, heifers were given PGF (a.m.) and norgestomet implants were removed (p.m.). Heifers in Groups 2B to 2D were given 25 mg LH (Lutropin((R))): Group 2B, Day 4 (a.m.); Group 2C, Day 4 (p.m.); Group 2D, Day 5 (a.m.). Heifers in Group 2A were inseminated at estrus and 12 and 24 h later, while heifers in Groups 2B to 2D were inseminated at the time of respective LH injection and 12 and 24 h later. Injection of LH induced ovulation in heifers in Groups 2B to 2D. Heifers in Group 2C had similar total ova and embryos (15.2 +/- 1.4) as heifers in Group 2A (11.0 +/- 2.8) but greater (P < 0.05) numbers than heifers in Group 2B (7.0 +/- 2.3) and Group 2D (6.3 +/- 2.0). The number of transferable embryos was similar for heifers in Group 2A (5.8 +/- 1.8) and Group 2C (7.3 +/- 2.1) but lower (P < 0.05) for heifers in Group 2B (1.2 +/- 0.8) and Group 2D (1.3 +/- 1.0). The new GnRH agonist-LH protocol does not require observation of estrus, and induces ovulation in superstimulated heifers that would not have an endogenous LH surge.     

Effect of LH or GnRH on the dominant follicle of the first follicular wave in beef heifers

A study was designed to characterise ovarian follicular dynamics in heifers treated with porcine luteinizing hormone (pLH) or gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) on days 3, 6 or 9 (ovulation = day 0), corresponding to the growing, early-static, and late-static phases of the first follicular wave. Following ovulation, 65 beef heifers were assigned, by replicate, to the following seven treatment groups: 25 mg im of pLH on days 3, 6 or 9 (n = 9 per group); 100 microg im of GnRH on days 3, 6 or 9 (n = 9 per group); or controls (no treatment; n = 11). Ovulation occurred within 36 h in 67%, 100% and 67% of heifers treated with pLH and in 89%, 56% and 22% of heifers treated with GnRH on days 3, 6 or 9, respectively (treatment-by-day interaction, P < 0.09). Combined for all treatment days, ovulation rates were 78% and 56% in pLH- and GnRH-treated groups, respectively (P < 0.09). Overall, mean day (+/- SD) of emergence of the second follicular wave in heifers that ovulated was different from that in controls or in heifers that did not ovulate (P < 0.05). Mean (+/- SD) day of emergence of the second wave occurred earlier (day 5.6+/-1.2; P < 0.05) in heifers that ovulated after treatment on day 3 (n = 14) than in controls (day 8.7+/-1.6; n = 11); however, wave emergence in all heifers treated on day 6 (day 8.1+/-0.5; n = 18) did not differ from controls, regardless of whether or not ovulation occurred. In the heifers that ovulated in response to treatment on day 9 (n = 8), the emergence of the second follicular wave was delayed (day 10.9+/-0.4; P < 0.05). The day of emergence of the second wave in the 14 treated heifers that failed to ovulate, irrespective of the day of treatment (day 8.9+/-1.4) did not differ from control heifers. The emergence of the second wave was more synchronous in day 6 heifers (regardless of whether they ovulated) and in day 9 heifers that ovulated compared to control heifers (P < 0.05). Results did not support the hypothesis that the administration of pLH or GnRH at known stages of the follicular wave in cycling heifers would consistently induce ovulation or atresia and, thereby, induce emergence of a new follicular wave at a predictable interval. New wave emergence was induced consistently (1.3 days post-treatment) only in those animals that ovulated in response to treatment. However, 22% of LH-treated heifers and 44% of GnRH-treated heifers failed to ovulate. Treatments did not induce atresia of the dominant follicle or alter the interval to new wave emergence in animals that did not ovulate in response to treatment.     

Effect of estradiol valerate on ovarian follicle dynamics and superovulatory response in progestin-treated cattle

Three experiments evaluated the effects of estradiol valerate (EV) on ovarian follicular and CL dynamics, intervals to estrus and ovulation, and superovulatory response in cattle. Experiment 1 compared the efficacy of two norgestomet ear implants (Crestar and Syncro-Mate B; SMB) for 9 d (with PGF at implant removal), combined with either 5 mg estradiol-17beta and 100 mg progesterone (EP) or 5 mg EV and 3mg norgestomet (EN) im at the time of implant insertion on CL diameter and follicular wave dynamics. Ovaries were monitored by ultrasonography. There was no effect of norgestomet implant. Diameter of the CL decreased following EN treatment (P < 0.01). Mean (+/- S.D.) day of follicular wave emergence (FWE) was earlier (P < 0.0001) and less variable (P < 0.0001) in EP- (3.6 +/- 0.5 d) than in EN- (5.7 +/- 1.5 d) treated heifers. Intervals from implant removal to estrus (P < 0.001) and ovulation (P < 0.01) were shorter in EN- (45.7 +/- 11.7 and 74.3 +/- 12.6 h, respectively) than in EP- (56.4 +/- 14.1 and 83.3 +/- 17.0 h, respectively) treated heifers. Experiment 2 compared the efficacy of EP versus EN in synchronizing FWE for superovulation in SMB-implanted cows. At random stages of the estrous cycle, Holstein cows (n = 78) received two SMB implants (Day 0) and were randomly assigned to receive EN on Day 0 or EP on Day 1. Folltropin-V treatments were initiated on the evening of Day 5, with PGF in the morning and evening of Day 8, when SMB were removed. Cows were inseminated after the onset of estrus and embryos were recovered 7 d later. Non-lactating cows had more CL (16.7 +/- 11.3 versus 8.3 +/- 4.9) and total ova/embryos (14.7 +/- 9.5 versus 7.9 +/- 4.6) than lactating cows (P < 0.05). EP-treated cows tended (P = 0.09) to yield more transferable embryos (5.6 +/- 5.2) than EN-treated cows (4.0 +/- 3.7). Experiment 3 compared the effect of dose of EV on ovarian follicle and CL growth profiles and synchrony of estrus and ovulation in CIDR-treated beef cows (n = 43). At random stages of the estrous cycle (Day 0), cows received a CIDR and no further treatment (Control), or an injection of 1, 2, or 5 mg im of EV. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and cows received PGF. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 d in 7/10 Control cows and 31/32 EV-treated cows (P < 0.05). In responding cows, interval from treatment to FWE was longer (P < 0.05) in those treated with 5 mg EV (4.8 +/- 1.2 d) than in those treated with 1 mg (3.2 +/- 0.9 d) or 2 mg (3.4 +/- 0.8 d) EV, while Control cows were intermediate (3.8 +/- 2.0 d). Diameter of the dominant follicle was smaller (P < 0.05) at CIDR removal and tended (P = 0.08) to be smaller just prior to ovulation in the 5 mg EV group (8.5 +/- 2.2 and 13.2 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively) than in the Control (11.8 +/- 4.6 and 15.5 +/- 2.9 mm, respectively) or 1mg EV (11.7 +/- 2.5 and 15.1 +/- 2.2 mm, respectively) groups, with the 2mg EV group (10.7 +/- 1.5 and 14.3 +/- 1.7 mm, respectively) intermediate. Diameter of the dominant follicle at CIDR removal was less variable (P < 0.01) in the 2 and 5mg EV groups than in the Control group, and intermediate in the 1mg EV group. In summary, treatment with 5mg EV resulted in a longer and more variable interval to follicular wave emergence than treatment with 5mg estradiol-17beta, which affected preovulatory dominant follicle size following progestin removal, and may have also affected superstimulatory response in Holstein cows. Additionally, 5 mg EV appeared to induce luteolysis in heifers, reducing the interval to ovulation following norgestomet removal. Conversely, intervals to, and synchrony of, follicular wave emergence, estrus and ovulation following treatment with 1 or 2 mg EV suggested that reduced doses of EV may be more useful for the synchronization of follicular wave emergence in progestogen-treated cattle.     

The variability in the interval between estrus and ovulation in cattle and its determinants

Fertility of Holstein cows has been decreasing for years and, to a lesser extent, the fertility of heifers too but more recently. A hypothesis to explain this phenomenon may be that the chronology of events leading to ovulation is different for those animals bred nowadays when compared to what was reported previously; this would result in an inappropriate time of insemination. Therefore, two experiments were designed to investigate the relationships among estrus behavior, follicular growth, hormonal events and time of ovulation in Holstein cows and heifers. In the first experiment, the onset of estrus, follicular growth, patterns of estradiol-17beta, progesterone and LH, and the time of ovulation were studied in 12 cyclic Holstein heifers that had their estrus synchronized using the Crestar method; this was done twice, 3 weeks apart. The intervals between estrus and ovulation, estrus and the LH peak, and between the LH peak and ovulation were, respectively, 38.5 h +/-3.0, 9.1 +/- 2.0 and 29.4 h +/-1.5 (mean+/- S.E.M). The variation in the interval between estrus and the LH peak explained 80.6% of the variation in the interval between estrus and ovulation. The intervals between estrus and the LH peak, and estrus and ovulation were correlated with estradiol-17beta peak value (r=-0.423, P <0.04 and r=-0.467, P<0.02, respectively). Positive correlation coefficients for the number of follicle larger than 5 mm, and negative correlation coefficients for the size of the preovulatory follicle with the intervals between estrus and LH peak, LH peak and ovulation, and estrus and ovulation suggest an ovarian control of these intervals. In respect to its role to explain the variation in the interval between estrus and ovulation, the variation in the interval between estrus and the LH peak was evaluated further in a second set of experiments utilizing 12 pubertal Holstein heifers and 35 Holstein cows. The duration of the interval between the beginning of estrus and the LH peak was longer in heifers than in cows (4.15 h versus -1.0 h; P <0.002); the variation for this interval was higher in cows than in heifers (S.E.M.= 1.2 h versus 0.8 h; P=0.01). According to the results of these studies it can be proposed that estradiol and other product(s) of ovarian origin regulate not only the duration of intervals between the onset of estrus and the LH surge but also between the LH surge and ovulation. From the results obtained in the first experiment, it may be postulated that differences observed between cows and heifers for the duration of the interval between onset of estrus and the LH surge as well as for the variation of this interval would be observed also for the interval between the onset of estrus and ovulation. Therefore, on a practical point of view, the long interval between the onset of estrus and ovulation and the high variation of this interval, especially in cows, may be a source of low fertility and should be considered when analysing reproductive disorders.     

Synchronisation of ovarian follicular waves in the dromedary camel (Camelus dromedarius)

This study was designed to compare the efficacy of various treatments intended to synchronise follicular wave cycles in dromedary camels by removing the existing follicle of unknown size and replacing it with a follicle capable of ovulating at a known time. Camels were randomly assigned to one of five groups and treated with either (1) 5mg oestradiol benzoate (i.m.) and 100mg progesterone (i.m.; E/P, n=15), (2) 20 icrog GnRH analogue, buserelin (i.m.; GnRH, n=15), (3) 20 microg buserelin (i.m.) on Day 0 (T=0) and 500 microg prostaglandin on Day T+7 (GnRH/PG n=15), (4) transvaginal ultrasound-guided follicle ablation of all follicles > or =0.5 cm (ABL, n=15) or (5) 5 ml saline (i.m; Controls n=15). All camels were subsequently injected with 20 microg buserelin 14 days after the first treatment was given. The ovarian response was monitored daily by transrectal ultrasonography and the intervals from treatment to follicular wave emergence and also the day on which the new dominant follicle reached 1.3 cm was recorded. Amongst the treatment groups the mean interval from treatment to new follicle wave emergence and treatment to time taken for the new dominant follicle to reach 1.3 cm in diameter was shortest in the ABL group (2.3+/-0.5 days and 8.8+/-1.1 days respectively, P=0.044) and longest in the E/P group (6.4+/-0.8 days and 12.2+/-1.0 days respectively, P<0.001) whereas the GnRH and GnRH/PG groups were intermediate (3.0+/-0.5 days and 11.1+/-0.8 days GnRH; and 4.5+/-0.5 days and 10.7+/-0.7 days GnRH/PG). A total of 11/15 camels in both the GnRH and GnRH/PG groups had dominant follicles between 1.3 and 1.9 cm 14 days post treatment, of which 21 of the 22 follicles ovulated after GnRH injection on T+14. The ABL, E/P and control groups however, showed greater variability in follicle size with less camels having dominant follicles between 1.3 and 1.9 cm than the GnRH and GnRH/PG groups and more in the > or =2.0 cm or follicle regressing groups, therefore fewer of these camels ovulated (ABL n=7; E/P n=9; Control n=6) after GnRH injection on Day T+14. In conclusion, two GnRH injections 14 days apart or two GnRH injections 14 days apart and PG on Day 7 after the first GnRH were the most effective methods to synchronise ovulation rate in dromedary camels at a fixed time interval of 14 days after treatment.     

Influence of CIDR treatment during superovulation on embryo production and hormonal patterns in cattle

One of the major sources of success in embryo transfer is timing of AI relative to the LH surge and ovulation. The aim of this study was to compare the embryo production following superovulation during a PGF2alpha (control cycle) or a CIDR-B synchronized cycle (CIDR-B cycle). CIDR-B (CIDR-B ND, Virbac, Carros, France) was inserted on Day 11 of a previously synchronized cycle and left for 5 days. A total dose of 350 microg FSH was administered (eight injections i.m. for 4 days; first on Day 13, decreasing doses) and PGFalpha analog (750 microg i.m.: Uniandine ND, Schering-Plough, Levallois-Perret, France) injected at the time of third FSH injection. Artificial inseminations were performed 12 and 24 h after standing estrus (Day 0). Embryos were collected on Day 7. Luteinizing hormone was measured by EIA (Reprokit Sanofi, Libourne, France) from blood samples collected every 3 h for 36 h, starting 24 h after PGF2alpha (control cycle) or 12 h after CIDR-B removal (CIDR-B cycle). The effects of treatment group and interval between the LH peak and AI (two classes, < 10 and > or = 10 h) on embryo production and quality were analyzed by ANOVA. No effect of treatment was observed on embryo production variables. The intervals between the end of treatment and onset of estrus and between end of treatment and LH surge were greater in heifers treated during a control than a CIDR-B cycle, respectively (45.5 +/- 1.4 versus 31.9 +/- 0.7; 42.0 +/- 1.6 versus 31.0 +/- 1.5; P < 0.05), but maximal LH and estradiol concentrations, at the preovulatory surge were similar in control and CIDR-B synchronized heifers. The numbers of viable and Grade I embryos were significantly increased (P < 0.01) when animals had an interval from LH peak to first AI > or = 10 h (7.2 +/- 0.9 and 3.5 +/- 0.6) when compared to shorter intervals (4.2 +/- 1.1 and 2.0 +/- 0.7) whereas total number of embryos was unchanged (11.8 +/- 1.4 versus 10.3 +/- 1.8). It is concluded that late occurrence of LH peaks in relation to estrous behavior is associated with a lower embryo quality when first AIs are performed systematically 12 h after standing estrus. Further studies are needed to know if results may be improved when making AI at a later time after standing estrus or if LH assays are useful to better monitor AI time.     

Ovulatory responses and plasma luteinizing hormone concentrations in dairy heifers after treatment with exogenous progesterone and estradiol benzoate

The objectives of this experiment were to determine the effects of 0.5 mg estradiol benzoate, administered intramuscularly 24 h after removal of CIDR-B progesterone containing intravaginal devices, on the time to estrus, ovulation and peak LH concentration in dairy heifers. Ovulatory responses and plasma LH concentrations were examined using 14 Friesian dairy heifers in 2 separate treatment periods. All heifers received a CIDR-B progesterone-containing intravaginal device with an attached 10-mg estradiol benzoate capsule for 12 d. Within each period, 24 h after CIDR-B removal, 7 heifers received an intramuscular injection of 0.5 mg estradiol benzoate while the remaining 7 heifers received an intramuscular injection of a placebo. Blood samples for LH assay were collected at 0, 6 and 12 h, and then every 4 h for 60 h after estradiol injection. Detection of estrus was conducted at 4-h intervals, and ultrasonographical examination to detect ovulation was conducted every 8 h for 88 h after removal of the CIDR-B device. Treatment with estradiol benzoate tended to reduce the time from device removal to the LH peak in Period 1 (median time to LH peak 40.1 vs 63.9 h; P = 6.07). In Period 2, treatment with estradiol had no significant effect on the time to the LH peak, standing estrus or ovulation. We hypothesize that the period effect was due to the stage of cycle at the time of treatment. For heifers treated in Period 1, the stage of cycle was random. However, because of the prior synchronization of estrus, which was implicit in the experimental design, heifers in Period 2 tended to be in late diestrus. The administration of estradiol benzoate after treatment with exogenous progesterone appears to overcome the variability in timing of LH peaks typically occurring in a herd of synchronized heifers due to different stages of follicular development.     

Effects of estradiol cypionate (ECP) on ovarian follicular dynamics,synchrony of ovulation,and fertility in CIDR-based,fixed-time AI programs in beef heifers

Estradiol cypionate (ECP) was used in beef heifers receiving a controlled internal drug release (CIDR; insertion = Day 0) device for fixed-time AI (FTAI) in four experiments. In Experiment 1, heifers (n = 24) received 1mg ECP or 1mg ECP plus 50mg commercial progesterone (CP) preparation i.m. on Day 0. Eight or 9 days later, CIDR were removed, PGF was administered and heifers were allocated to receive 0.5mg ECP i.m. concurrently (ECP0) or 24h later (ECP24). There was no effect of treatment (P = 0.6) on mean (+/-S.E.M.) day of follicular wave emergence (3.9+/-0.4 days). Interval from CIDR removal to ovulation was affected (P<0.05) only by duration of CIDR treatment (88.3+/-3.8h versus 76.4+/-4.1h; 8 days versus 9 days, respectively). In Experiment 2, 58 heifers received 100mg progesterone and either 5mg estradiol-17beta or 1mg ECP i.m. (E-17beta and ECP groups, respectively) on Day 0. Seven (E-17beta group) or 9 days (ECP group) later, CIDR were removed, PGF was administered and heifers received ECP (as in Experiment 1) or 1mg EB 24h after CIDR removal, with FTAI 58-60h after CIDR removal. Follicular wave emergence was later (P<0.02) and more variable (P<0.002) in heifers given ECP than in those given E-17beta (4.1+/-0.4 days versus 3.3+/-0.1 days), but pregnancy rate was unaffected (overall, 69%; P = 0.2). In Experiment 3, 30 heifers received a CIDR device and 5mg E-17beta, with or without 100mg progesterone (P) i.m. on Day 0. On Day 7, CIDR were removed and heifers received ECP as described in Experiment 1 or no estradiol (Control). Intervals from CIDR removal to ovulation were shorter (P<0.05) in ECP0 (81.6+/-5.0h) and ECP24 (86.4+/-3.5h) groups than in the Control group (98.4+/-5.6h). In Experiment 4, heifers (n = 300) received a CIDR device, E-17beta, P, and PGF (as in Experiment 3) and after CIDR removal were allocated to three groups (as in Experiment 2), with FTAI 54-56h (ECP0) or 56-58h (ECP24 and EB24) after CIDR removal. Pregnancy rate did not differ among groups (overall, 63.6%, P = 0.96). In summary, although 1mg ECP (with or without progesterone) was less efficacious than 5mg E-17beta plus 100mg progesterone for synchronizing follicular wave emergence, 0.5mg ECP (at CIDR removal or 24h later) induced a synchronous ovulation with an acceptable pregnancy rate to fixed-time AI.     

Ovarian superstimulation after follicular wave synchronization with GnRH at two different stages of the estrous cycle in cattle

The objective of this study was to evaluate superovulatory programs based on synchronization of follicular waves with GnRH at 2 different stages of the estrous cycle. Sixteen Holstein cows were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups and administered GnRH (Cystorelin, 4 ml i.m.) between Days 4 and 7 (Groups 1 and 3) or between Days 15 and 18 (Group 2) of the estrous cycle (estrus = Day 0). Four days after GnRH treatment, > or = 7-mm follicles were punctured in Groups 1 (n = 6) and 2 (n = 6) or were left intact in Group 3 (n = 4). All cows were superstimulated 2 d later (i.e., from Days 6 to 10 after GnRH treatment) with a total of 400 mg NIH-FSH (Folltropin-V) given twice daily in decreasing doses. The GnRH treatment caused a rapid disappearance of large follicles (P < 0.005), rapid decrease in estradiol concentrations (P < 0.003), and increase in the number of recruitable follicles (4 to 6 mm; P < 0.04), indicative of the emergence of a new follicular wave within 3 to 4 d of treatment. Between 4 and 6 d after GnRH treatment, the mean number of 4- to 6-mm follicles decreased (4.7 +/- 1.8 to 1.5 +/- 3.3) in the nonpunctured group but increased (3.9 +/- 1.0 to 7.3 +/- 1.9) in the punctured group of cows (P < 0.05). In response to FSH treatment, the increase in the number of > or = 7-mm follicles was delayed by approximately 2 d in the nonpunctured group (P < 0.006). Moreover, the mean number of > or = 7-mm follicles at estrus was higher (16.9 +/- 1.7 vs 11.5 +/- 3.0; P < 0.1) in the punctured than the nonpunctured group. The increase in progesterone concentration after estrus was delayed in the nonpunctured group (P < 0.1) compared with the punctured follicles. Mean numbers of CL as well as freezable (Grade 1 and 2) and transferable (Grade 1, 2 and 3) embryos were similar (P > 0.1) in punctured and nonpunctured groups. Spontaneous estrus did not occur prior to cloprostenol-induced luteolysis in any group, and stage of the estrous cycle during which GnRH was given did not affect (P > 0.1) hormonal and follicular responses in the punctured groups. In conclusion, GnRH given at different stages of the estrous cycle promotes the emergence of a follicular wave at a predictable time. Puncture of the newly formed dominant follicle increases the number of recruitable follicles (4 to 6 mm) 2 d later and, in response to superstimulation with FSH, causes a greater number and faster entry of recruitable follicles into larger classes (> or = 7 mm) and a faster postovulatory increase in progesterone concentrations.     

Effect of early luteolysis in progesterone-based timed AI protocols in Bos indicus, Bos indicus x Bos taurus, and Bos taurus heifers

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of treatment with an intravaginal progesterone-releasing device (CIDR) and estradiol benzoate (EB) on follicular dynamics in Bos indicus (n=23), Bos taurus (n=25), and cross-bred (n=23) heifers. To assess the influence of reduced serum progesterone concentrations during 8 days of treatment with a progesterone-releasing device on follicular dynamics, half of the heifers received PGF at CIDR insertion (Day 0; 3 x 2 factorial design). Mean (+/-S.E.M.) serum progesterone concentrations during CIDR treatment varied (P<0.05) among genetic groups: B. indicus (5.4+/-0.1 ng/mL), B. taurus (3.3+/-0.0 ng/mL), and cross-bred (4.3+/-0.1 ng/mL). Maximum diameter of the dominant follicle (DF) was smaller (P<0.01) in B. indicus heifers (9.5+/-0.5 mm) than in cross-bred (12.3+/-0.4 mm) or B. taurus heifers (11.6+/-0.5 mm). B. indicus experienced lower (P<0.01) ovulation rate (39.1%) than did B. taurus (72.7%) and cross-bred (84.0%). Heifers treated with PGF on Day 0 had lower (P<0.05) serum progesterone concentrations during progesterone treatment. The PGF treatment on Day 0 increased (P<0.01) the diameter of the DF (11.9+/-0.4 mm vs. 10.5+/-0.4 mm). Moreover, greater (P=0.02) ovulation rates (78.8 vs. 54.0%) occurred in heifers treated with PGF on Day 0. In summary, B. indicus heifers had greater serum progesterone concentrations, smaller DF diameter, and a lower ovulation rate compared to B. taurus heifers. Prostaglandin treatment on the day of CIDR insertion reduced serum progesterone during treatment, and resulted in increased maximum DF diameter and ovulation rate.     

Induction of a new follicular wave in holstein heifers synchronized with norgestomet

Treatments with progestin to synchronize the bovine estrous cycle in the absence of the corpus luteum, induces persistence of a dominant follicle and a reduction of fertility at doses commonly utilized. The objective of the present research was to induce a new wave of ovarian follicular development in heifers in which stage of the estrous cycle was synchronized with norgestomet. Holstein heifers (n=30) were used, in which estrus was synchronized using two doses of PGF2alpha i.m. (25 mg each) 11 days apart. Six days after estrus (day 0=day of estrus) heifers received a norgestomet implant (6 mg of norgestomet). On day 12, heifers were injected with 25 mg of PGF2alpha i.m. and assigned to treatments (T1 to T4) as follows: treatment 1, heifers received a second norgestomet implant (T1: N+N, n=6), treatment 2, received 100 microg of GnRH i.m. (T2: N+GnRH, n=6), treatment 3, 200 mg of progesterone i.m. (T3: N+P4, n=6), treatment 4, control treatment with saline solution i.m. (T4: N+SS); in the four treatments (T1 to T4) implants were removed on day 14. For treatment 5, heifers received 100 microg of GnRH i.m. on day 9 and 25 mg of PGF2alpha i.m. (T5: N+GnRH+PGF2alpha) at the time of implant removal (day 16). Ovarian evaluations using ultrasonographic techniques were performed every 48 h from days 3 to 11 and every 24 h from days 11 to 21. Blood samples were collected every 48 h to analyze for progesterone concentration. A new wave of ovarian follicular development was induced in 3/6, 6/6, 3/6, 1/6 and 6/6, and onset of estrus in 6/6, 0/6, 6/6, 6/6 and 6/6 for T1, T2, T3, T4 and T5, respectively. Heifers from T1, T3 and T4 that ovulated from a persistent follicle, showed estrus 37.5 +/- 12.10 h after implant removal and heifers that developed a new wave of ovarian follicular development showed it at 120.28 +/- 22.81 h (P<0.01). Ovulation occurred at 5.92 +/- 1.72 and 2.22 +/- 1.00 days (P<0.01), respectively. Progesterone concentration was <1 ng/ml from days 7 to 15 in T1, T2 and T4; for T3 progesterone concentration was 2.25 +/- 0.50 ng/ml on day 13 and decreased on day 15 to 0.34 +/- 0.12 ng/ml (P<0.01). For T5, progesterone concentration was 1.66 +/- 0.58 ng/ml on day 15. The more desirable results were obtained with T5, in which 100% of heifers had a new wave of ovarian follicular development induced, with onset of estrus and ovulation synchronized in a short time period.     

Effect of purified llama ovulation-inducing factor (OIF) on ovarian function in cattle

Two experiments were designed to determine the effect of purified ovulation inducing factor (OIF) on ovarian function in cattle. In Experiment 1, prepubertal heifers (n = 11 per group) were treated on Day 5 (Day 0 = day of follicular wave emergence) of the follicular wave with an intramuscular dose of saline (1 mL), GnRH (100 μg), or purified OIF (1 mg/100 kg body weight). Ovulation occurred in 9/11 heifers treated with GnRH, and 1/11 heifers in each of the OIF- and saline-treated groups (P < 0.05). Compared to saline-treated controls, OIF treatment was associated with a smaller dominant follicle diameter (P < 0.01), a rise in plasma FSH concentration (P < 0.1), and earlier emergence of the next follicular wave (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, sexually mature heifers were given either GnRH or purified OIF on Days 3, 6 or 9 of the first follicular wave (i.e., early growing, early static, or late static phase of the dominant follicle; n = 5 per group per day), or were untreated (n = 10). In heifers treated with OIF on Day 6, the dominant follicle diameter profile tended to be smaller than in controls, and was associated with a rise (P < 0.05) in plasma FSH concentrations. A similar rise in FSH was detected after OIF treatment on Day 9. Compared to untreated controls, treatment with OIF and GnRH was associated with a larger CL diameter (Days 3 and 6 groups; P < 0.05) and a greater concentration of plasma progesterone (Days 6 and 9 groups; P < 0.05). Treatment with purified OIF did not induce ovulation in heifers, but hastened new follicular wave emergence in prepubertal heifers, influenced follicular dynamics in a phase-specific manner in mature heifers, and was luteotrophic.     

Fixed-time insemination in peripuberal,lightweight replacement beef heifers after estrus synchronization with PGF2alpha and GnRH

Estrus synchronization contributes to optimizing the use of time, labor, and financial resources by shortening the calving season, in addition to increasing the uniformity of the calf crop. We determined whether acceptable pregnancy rates could be achieved after synchronization of ovulation and fixed-time artificial insemination (AI) in peripuberal replacement beef heifers using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and PGF2alpha. Crossbred heifers from two herds (MH, n=239; SS, n=330) were wintered at a single location. After a prebreeding examination revealed that 55 heifers had a reproductive tract score (RTS) of 1 (infantile reproductive tracts), they were culled and the remaining heifers were assigned randomly to one of three treatment groups: administration of 25mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Days -12 and 0 followed by estrus detection and insemination between 10 and 14 h after an observed estrus (Control; n=173); administration of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day -6, followed by 25 mg PGF2alpha i.m. on Day 0, then fixed-time AI and administration of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day +2 (GPG; n=172); and, treatment as for group GPG in addition to administration of 100 microg GnRH i.m. on Day -12 (GGPG; n=169). Bulls were introduced 10 days after AI for 60 days to breed heifers which did not conceive after AI (clean-up bulls). On Days -12, -6, and 0 transrectal ultrasonography was used to monitor ovarian structures in a subset of heifers (30 per treatment). At 30-35 days after AI, ultrasound was used to determine the presence of a viable fetus. Presence of a fetus and stage of pregnancy were determined via palpation per rectum 61-63 days after the conclusion of the breeding season. Heifers in the MH herd (309+/-1.9 kg) were heavier (P<0.001) than those in the SS herd (283+/-1.7 kg) at initiation of the breeding season. Synchronized pregnancy rates were greater (P<0.05) in GGPG (25.4%) and GPG (22.1%) than Control (12.7%) heifers. Pregnancy rates were 9, 21, 32, or 31% for heifers with RTS of 2, 3, 4, or 5, respectively. The average diameter of 22 follicles induced to ovulate in heifers treated with GnRH (GPG and GGPG treatments) was 14.2+/-0.8 mm (range=10.0-23.6 mm). In conclusion, a fixed-time ovulation synchronization program using GnRH and PGF2alpha improved pregnancy rates in peripuberal, lightweight replacement beef heifers.     

The effects of dose and duration of administration of pFSH during the first follicular wave on the ovulation rate of beef heifers

Four experiments were carried out to examine the effects of administration of pFSH (Vetrepharm) from Day 3 of the estrous cycle in conjunction with PG on Day 5 on follicular populations and ovulation rate in heifers. In Experiment 1, 47 heifers were allocated to 1 of 4 treatment groups (n = 11 to 12 per group): a) control, b) 1.5 mg pFSH, c) 2.0 mg pFSH or d) 2.5 mg pFSH until estrus. Heifers assigned to the 3 treatments had a higher ovulation rate than the controls (P < 0.05). In Experiment 2, 45 heifers were allocated to 1 of 5 treatment groups (n = 8 to 10 per group): a) control, b) 1.0 mg pFSH until PG, c) 1.0 mg pFSH until estrus, d) 1.5 mg pFSH until PG or e) 1.5 mg pFSH until estrus. From Day 5, heifers assigned to pFSH treatments had more large follicles than the controls (P < 0.05). There was no effect of treatment on the incidence of twin ovulations. In Experiment 3, 43 heifers were assigned to 1 of 3 groups (n = 11 to 16 per group): a) control, b) 1.0 mg pFSH until estrus or c) 1.5 mg pFSH until estrus. At slaughter, 14 d after administration of PG, the incidence of twin ovulations was 0/11, 7/16 and 8/16 for Groups a, b and c, respectively (P = 0.011). In Experiment 4, pFSH (1.5 mg) was administered to 3 groups during the development of the first dominant follicle: a) growth phase (n = 19); b) static phase (n = 17); and c) decline phase (n = 17). All pFSH-treated heifers had a higher ovulation rate than the controls (P < 0.05); heifers assigned to Group c had a higher ovulation rate than those in Groups a or b (P < 0.05). More heifers assigned to Group c (7/17) superovulated than in the other 2 groups (P < 0.05). In conclusion, administration of 1.0 or 1.5 mg pFSH twice daily beginning at Day 3 of the estrous cycle in association with the induction of luteolysis increased the ovulation rate significantly when pFSH treatment was continued to onset of estrus. The ovulation rate and the occurrence of multiple ovulations were significantly higher when pFSH was administered at the time that the first dominant follicle was in decline.     

Resynchronization of previously timed-inseminated beef heifers with progestins

The objective was to determine the efficacy of a previously used CIDR or melengestrol acetate (MGA; 0.5mg/head/day) for resynchronization of estrus in beef heifers not pregnant to timed-AI (TAI). In three experiments and a field trial, heifers were reinseminated 6-12 h after first detection of estrus. Pregnancy diagnosis was done from approximately 25-43 days after either TAI or reinsemination. In Experiment 1, 79 heifers received a once-used CIDR from 13 to 20 days after TAI and 80 heifers were untreated controls. For these two groups, there were 34 and 35 heifers, respectively, not pregnant to TAI; median +/- S.E. intervals from TAI to onset of estrus were 22 +/- 0.2 days versus 20 +/- 0.6 days (P < 0.001); estrus rates were 70.6% versus 85.7% (P = 0.1); conception rates were 62.5% versus 76.7% (P < 0.3); and pregnancy rates were 44.1% versus 65.7% (P = 0.07), for CIDR and untreated (control) groups, respectively. In Experiment 2, heifers (n = 651) were TAI (Day 0) and 13 days later randomly assigned to one of seven groups (n = 93 per group) to receive a once-used CIDR (three groups; Days 13-20), MGA (three groups; Days 13-19), or no treatment (control group). Groups given a CIDR or MGA also received: no further treatment (CIDR or MGA alone); 1.5mg estradiol-17beta (E-17beta) and 50 mg progesterone (P4) in 2 mL canola oil on Day 13; or E-17beta and P4 on Day 13 and 0.5 mg E-17beta on Day 21 (24 h after CIDR removal or 48 h after the last feeding of MGA). Pregnancy rate to TAI was lowest (P < 0.05) for the group given a CIDR plus E-17beta and P4 on Day 13 and E-17beta on Day 21. Variability in return to estrus was greater (P < 0.001) in the control and MGA groups than in CIDR groups. Conception and pregnancy rates in heifers given a CIDR (65.1 and 61.4%) were higher (P<0.01) than those fed MGA (49.6 and 40.4%), but not different from controls (62.2 and 54.9%, respectively). In Experiment 3, 616 heifers received a once- or twice-used CIDR for 7 days, beginning 13+/-1 days after TAI, with or without a concurrent injection of 150 mg of P4 (2 x 2 factorial design). Pregnancy rate to TAI was 47.2%. In heifers that returned to estrus, there was no significant difference between a once- or twice-used CIDR for rates of estrus (68.8%, P < 0.3), conception (65.9%, P < 0.6) and pregnancy (45.3%, P < 0.8). Injecting progesterone at CIDR insertion increased the median interval from CIDR removal to onset of estrus (P < 0.05) and reduced rates of estrus (63.8% versus 73.8%, P<0.05), conception (60.5% versus 70.6%, P = 0.1) and pregnancy (38.6% versus 52.2%, P < 0.02). In a field trial, 983 heifers received a once-used CIDR for 7 days, beginning 13 +/- 1 days after TAI. Pregnancy rate to TAI was 55.2%. The median (and mode) of the interval from CIDR removal to estrus was 2.5 days. Estrus, conception and pregnancy rates were 78.2, 70.3 and 55.0% (overall pregnancy rate to TAI and rebreeding, 78.7%). In summary, a once- or twice-used CIDR for 7 days, starting 13 +/- 1 days after TAI resulted in the majority of nonpregnant heifers detected in estrus over a 4-day interval, with acceptable conception rates; however, injecting progesterone at CIDR insertion significantly reduced both estrus and pregnancy rates, and estradiol treatment after CIDR removal was associated with a decreased pregnancy rate to TAI. Fertility was higher in heifers resynchronized with a once-used CIDR than with MGA.     

Embryo recovery and pregnancy rates after the delay of ovulation and fixed time insemination in superstimulated beef cows

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of delaying ovulation subsequent to superstimulation of follicular growth in beef cows (Bos indicus) on embryo recovery rates and the capacity of embryos to establish pregnancies. Ovulation was delayed by three treatments using either progesterone (CIDR-B) or a GnRH agonist (deslorelin). Multiparous Nelore cows (n = 24) received three of four superstimulation treatments in an incomplete block design (n = 18 per group). Cows in Groups CTRL, P48 and P60 were treated with a CIDR-B device plus estradiol benzoate (EB, 4 mg, i.m.) on Day-5, while cows in Group D60 were implanted with deslorelin on Day-7. Cows were superstimulated with FSH (Folltropin-V, 200 mg), from Day 0 to 3, using twice daily injections in decreasing amounts. All cows were treated with a luteolytic dose of prostaglandin on Day 2 (08:00 h). CIDR-B devices were removed as follows: Group CTRL, Day 2 (20:00 h); Group P48, Day 4 (08:00 h); Group P60, Day 4 (20:00 h). Cows in Group CTRL were inseminated at 10, 20 and 30 h after first detected estrus. Ovulation was induced for cows in Group P48 (Day 4, 08:00 h) and Groups P60 and D60 (Day 4, 20:00 h) by injection of LH (Lutropin, 25 mg, i.m.), and these cows were inseminated 10 and 20 h after treatment with LH. Embryos were recovered on Days 11 or 12, graded and transferred to synchronized recipients. Pregnancies were determined by ultrasonography around Day 100. Data were analyzed by mixed procedure, Kruskal-Wallis and Chi-square tests. The number of ova/embryos, transferable embryos (mean +/- SEM) and pregnancy rates (%) were as follows, respectively: Group CTRL (10.8+/-1.8, 6.1+/-1.3, 51.5), P48 (12.6+/-1.9, 7.1+/-1.0, 52.3), P60 (10.5+/-1.6, 5.7+/-1.3, 40.0) and D60 (10.3+/-1.7, 5.0+/-1.2, 50.0). There were no significant differences among the groups (P > 0.05). It was concluded that fixed time AI in association with induced ovulation did not influence embryo recovery. Furthermore, pregnancy rates in embryos recovered from cows with delayed ovulation were similar to those in embryos obtained from cows treated with a conventional superstimulation protocol.     

Reduction in size of the ovulatory follicle reduces subsequent luteal size and pregnancy rate

We hypothesized that reducing the size of the ovulatory follicle using aspiration and GnRH would reduce the size of the resulting CL, reduce circulating progesterone concentrations, and alter conception rates. Lactating dairy cows (n=52) had synchronized ovulation and AI by treating with GnRH and PGF2alpha as follows: Day -9, GnRH (100 microg); Day -2, PGF2alpha (25 mg); Day 0, GnRH (100 microg); Day 1, AI. Treated cows (aspirated group; n=29) had all follicles > 4 mm in diameter aspirated on Days -5 or -6 in order to start a new follicular wave. Control cows (nonaspirated group: n=23) had no follicle aspiration. The size of follicles and CL were monitored by ultrasonography. The synchronized ovulation rate (ovulation rate to second GnRH injection: 42/52=80.8%) and double ovulation rate of synchronized cows (6/42=14.3%) did not differ (P > 0.05) between groups. Aspiration reduced the size of the ovulatory follicle (P < 0.0001; 11.5 +/- 0.2 vs 14.5 +/- 0.4 mm), and serum estradiol concentrations at second GnRH treatment (P < 0.0002; 2.5 +/- 0.4 vs 5.7 +/- 0.6 pg/mL). The volume of CL was less (P < 0.05) for aspirated than nonaspirated cows on Day 7 (2,862 +/- 228 vs 5,363 +/- 342 mm3) or Day 14 (4,652 +/- 283 vs 6,526 +/- 373 mm3). Similarly, serum progesterone concentrations were less on Day 7 (P < 0.05) and Day 14 (P < 0.10) for aspirated cows. Pregnancy rate per AI for synchronized cows was lower (P < 0.05) for aspirated (3/21=14.3%) than nonaspirated (10/21=47.6%) cows. In conclusion, ovulation of smaller follicles produced lowered fertility possibly because development of smaller CL decreased circulating progesterone concentrations.     

Use of steroid hormone treatments prior to superovulation in Nelore donors.

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of synchronization of follicular wave emergence using steroid hormone treatments in Nelore cows. Donors were placed into three groups. Those that were between days 9 and 12 of their cycle (estrus=day 0) formed the TI group (n=60), whilst those that were in any other stages of their estrus cycle constituted groups TII (n=60) and TIII (n=60). TI donors were submitted to a standard protocol of superovulation, however, TII and TIII donors were treated with the Syncro-Mate-B (SMB) or Controlled Internal Drug Releasing Device (CIDR-B) programs, respectively. Superovulation was induced with p-FSH, divided into eight decreasing doses at intervals of 12h. The donors received cloprostenol 48h after the beginning of the treatment and progestagens were removed 12h later. Artificial inseminations (AI) were done at 12 and 22h after the initiation of estrus and the embryo collections were done 7 days after AI. In the donors which displayed behavioral estrus, mean (+/-S.E.M.) total ova and viable (transferable) embryos were 15.8+/-1.4 and 8.3+/-1.0 (TI, n=56); 15.6+/-1.3 and 8.9+/-1.0 (TII, n=56); 17.3+/-1.0 and 9.9+/-0.9 (TIII, n=57), respectively, with no significant difference (P > or =0.05) among groups. In those animals that did not displayed behavioral estrus, the mean values of total ova and viable embryos were 3.5+/-1.6 and 0.7+/-0.5 (TI, n=4); 11.5+/-3.9 and 9.0+/-4.4 (TII, n=4); 8.7+/-5.0 and 5.0+/-2.9 (TIII, n=3), respectively, with no significant differences (P > or =0.05) among groups. Pregnancy rates of 62.2% (TI, n=235); 66.4% (TII, n=284) and 65.1% (TIII, n=244) were obtained with embryos transferred from these collections and did not differ significantly (P > or =0.05) among groups. It was concluded that the synchronization of the emergence of follicular waves in Nelore donors is usable and does not harm the efficiency of embryo transfer programs. In addition, in contrast to the standard superovulation protocol, this method permits the use of a large number of donors in a short time period, at any stage of the estrus cycle, minimizing the costs of embryo transfer.