Microtubules guide root hair tip growth

The ability to establish cell polarity is crucial to form and function of an individual cell. Polarity underlies critical processes during cell development, such as cell growth, cell division, cell differentiation and cell signalling. Interphase cytoplasmic microtubules in tip-growing fission yeast cells have been shown to play a particularly important role in regulating cell polarity. By placing proteins that serve as spatial cues in the cell cortex of the expanding tip, microtubules determine the site where exocytosis, and therefore growth, takes place. Transport and the targeting of exocytotic vesicles to the very tip depend on the actin cytoskeleton. Recently, endoplasmic microtubules have been identified in tip-growing root hairs, which are an experimental system for plant cell growth. Here, we review the data that demonstrate involvement of microtubules in hair elongation and polarity of the model plants Medicago truncatula and Arabidopsis thaliana. Differences and similarities between the microtubule organization and function in these two species are discussed and we compare the observations in root hairs with the microtubule-based polarity mechanism in fission yeast.     

Cell polarity in fission yeast: a matter of confining, positioning, and switching growth zones

The two key processes in growth polarisation are the generation of a confined region and the correct positioning of that region. Fission yeast has greatly contributed to the study of cell polarisation, particularly in the aspect of growth site positioning, which involves the interphase microtubule cytoskeleton. Here we review the mechanisms of growth polarity in vegetatively growing fission yeast cells. These seemingly simple cells show astonishingly complex growth polarity behaviour, including polarity switching and integrating multiple levels of control by the cell cycle machinery. We aim to extract and highlight the underlying concepts and discuss these in context of current understanding; showing how relevant proteins are networked to integrate the various machineries.     

Budding and cell polarity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Budding by yeast follows a sequence of three stages. These include selection of a non-random bud-site, organization of that site and establishment of an associated axis of cytoskeletal polarity, and localized growth of the cell surface to produce the bud. Numerous components involved in each stage have been identified. As some of these components have close homologs in other organisms, there may exist common mechanisms involved in the establishment of cell polarity.     

Fission yeast cell morphogenesis: identification of new genes and analysis of their role during the cell cycle

To identify new genes involved in the control of cell morphogenesis in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe we have visually screened for temperature-sensitive mutants that show defects in cell morphology. We have isolated and characterized 64 mutants defining 19 independent genes, 10 of which have not been previously described. One class of mutants, defining 12 orb genes, become round and show a complete loss of cell polarity. A second class of mutants exhibits branched or bent morphologies. These mutants show defects in either selection of the growth site, defining two tea genes, or in the maintenance of growth direction, defining five ban genes. Immunofluorescence analysis of these morphological mutants shows defects in the organization of the microtubule and actin cytoskeleton. These defects include shortened, bundled, and asymmetrically localized microtubules and enlarged and mislocalized actin patches. Analysis of the mutant phenotypes has allowed us to order the genes into four groups according to their function during the cell cycle: genes required for the maintenance of cell polarity throughout the cell cycle; genes necessary only for the reestablishment of cell polarity after mitosis and not for maintaining cell polarity once it is established; genes essential for the transition from monopolar to bipolar growth and genes that severe as ''polarity markers''.     

G proteins mediate changes in cell shape by stabilizing the axis of polarity

Upon exposure to mating pheromone, yeast cells change their form to pear-shaped shmoos. We looked at pheromone-dependent cell shape changes in mutants that are unable to orient growth during mating and unable to choose a bud site. In these double mutants, cell surface growth, secretion sites, cytoskeleton, and pheromone receptors are spread out, explaining why these cells are round. In contrast, polarity establishment proteins localize to discrete sites in these mutants. However, the location of these sites wanders. Thus, these mutants are able to initiate polarized growth but fail to maintain the location of growth sites. Our results demonstrate that stabilization of the growth axis requires positional signaling from either the pheromone receptor or specific bud site selection proteins.     

Fission yeast Aip3p (spAip3p) is required for an alternative actin-directed polarity program

Aip3p is an actin-interacting protein that regulates cell polarity in budding yeast. The Schizosaccharomyces pombe-sequencing project recently led to the identification of a homologue of Aip3p that we have named spAip3p. Our results confirm that spAip3p is a true functional homologue of Aip3p. When expressed in budding yeast, spAip3p localizes similarly to Aip3p during the cell cycle and complements the cell polarity defects of an aip3Delta strain. Two-hybrid analysis shows that spAip3p interacts with actin similarly to Aip3p. In fission yeast, spAip3p localizes to both cell ends during interphase and later organizes into two rings at the site of cytokinesis. spAip3p localization to cell ends is dependent on microtubule cytoskeleton, its localization to the cell middle is dependent on actin cytoskeleton, and both patterns of localization require an operative secretory pathway. Overexpression of spAip3p disrupts the actin cytoskeleton and cell polarity, leading to morphologically aberrant cells. Fission yeast, which normally rely on the microtubule cytoskeleton to establish their polarity axis, can use the actin cytoskeleton in the absence of microtubule function to establish a new polarity axis, leading to the formation of branched cells. spAip3p localizes to, and is required for, branch formation, confirming its role in actin-directed polarized cell growth in both Schizosaccharomyces pombe and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.     

Interaction between a Ras and a Rho GTPase couples selection of a growth site to the development of cell polarity in yeast

Polarized cell growth requires the coupling of a defined spatial site on the cell cortex to the apparatus that directs the establishment of cell polarity. In the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the Ras-family GTPase Rsr1p/Bud1p and its regulators select the proper site for bud emergence on the cell cortex. The Rho-family GTPase Cdc42p and its associated proteins then establish an axis of polarized growth by triggering an asymmetric organization of the actin cytoskeleton and secretory apparatus at the selected bud site. We explored whether a direct linkage exists between the Rsr1p/Bud1p and Cdc42p GTPases. Here we show specific genetic interactions between RSR1/BUD1 and particular cdc42 mutants defective in polarity establishment. We also show that Cdc42p coimmunoprecipitated with Rsr1p/Bud1p from yeast extracts. In vitro studies indicated a direct interaction between Rsr1p/Bud1p and Cdc42p, which was enhanced by Cdc24p, a guanine nucleotide exchange factor for Cdc42p. Our findings suggest that Cdc42p interacts directly with Rsr1p/Bud1p in vivo, providing a novel mechanism by which direct contact between a Ras-family GTPase and a Rho-family GTPase links the selection of a growth site to polarity establishment.     

PAK-family kinases regulate cell and actin polarization throughout the cell cycle of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

During the cell cycle of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the actin cytoskeleton and cell surface growth are polarized, mediating bud emergence, bud growth, and cytokinesis. We have determined whether p21-activated kinase (PAK)-family kinases regulate cell and actin polarization at one or several points during the yeast cell cycle. Inactivation of the PAK homologues Ste20 and Cla4 at various points in the cell cycle resulted in loss of cell and actin cytoskeletal polarity, but not in depolymerization of F-actin. Loss of PAK function in G1 depolarized the cortical actin cytoskeleton and blocked bud emergence, but allowed isotropic growth and led to defects in septin assembly, indicating that PAKs are effectors of the Rho-guanosine triphosphatase Cdc42. PAK inactivation in S/G2 resulted in depolarized growth of the mother and bud and a loss of actin polarity. Loss of PAK function in mitosis caused a defect in cytokinesis and a failure to polarize the cortical actin cytoskeleton to the mother-bud neck. Cla4-green fluorescent protein localized to sites where the cortical actin cytoskeleton and cell surface growth are polarized, independently of an intact actin cytoskeleton. Thus, PAK family kinases are primary regulators of cell and actin cytoskeletal polarity throughout most or all of the yeast cell cycle. PAK-family kinases in higher organisms may have similar functions.     

High Rates of Actin Filament Turnover in Budding Yeast and Roles for Actin in Establishment and Maintenance of Cell Polarity Revealed Using the Actin Inhibitor Latrunculin-A

We report that the actin assembly inhibitor latrunculin-A (LAT-A) causes complete disruption of the yeast actin cytoskeleton within 2–5 min, suggesting that although yeast are nonmotile, their actin filaments undergo rapid cycles of assembly and disassembly in vivo. Differences in the LAT-A sensitivities of strains carrying mutations in components of the actin cytoskeleton suggest that tropomyosin, fimbrin, capping protein, Sla2p, and Srv2p act to increase actin cytoskeleton stability, while End3p and Sla1p act to decrease stability. Identification of three LAT-A resistant actin mutants demonstrated that in vivo effects of LAT-A are due specifically to impairment of actin function and implicated a region on the three-dimensional actin structure as the LAT-A binding site.

LAT-A was used to determine which of 19 different proteins implicated in cell polarity development require actin to achieve polarized localization. Results show that at least two molecular pathways, one actindependent and the other actin-independent, underlie polarity development. The actin-dependent pathway localizes secretory vesicles and a putative vesicle docking complex to sites of cell surface growth, providing an explanation for the dependence of polarized cell surface growth on actin function. Unexpectedly, several proteins that function with actin during cell polarity development, including an unconventional myosin (Myo2p), calmodulin, and an actin-interacting protein (Bud6/Aip3p), achieved polarized localization by an actin-independent pathway, revealing interdependence among cell polarity pathways. Finally, transient actin depolymerization caused many cells to abandon one bud site or mating projection and to initiate growth at a second site. Thus, actin filaments are also required for maintenance of an axis of cell polarity.

     

Identification of Genes Controlling Growth Polarity in the Budding Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae: A Possible Role of N-Glycosylation and Involvement of the Exocyst Complex

The regulation of secretion polarity and cell surface growth during the cell cycle is critical for proper morphogenesis and viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. A shift from isotropic cell surface growth to polarized growth is necessary for bud emergence and a repolarization of secretion to the bud neck is necessary for cell separation. Although alterations in the actin cytoskeleton have been implicated in these changes in secretion polarity, clearly other cellular systems involved in secretion are likely to be targets of cell cycle regulation. To investigate mechanisms coupling cell cycle progression to changes in secretion polarity in parallel with and downstream of regulation of actin polarization, we implemented a screen for mutants defective specifically in polarized growth but with normal actin cytoskeleton structure. These mutants fell into three classes: those partially defective in N-glycosylation, those linked to specific defects in the exocyst, and a third class neither defective in glycosylation nor linked to the exocyst. These results raise the possibility that changes in N-linked glycosylation may be involved in a signal linking cell cycle progression and secretion polarity and that the exocyst may have regulatory functions in coupling the secretory machinery to the polarized actin cytoskeleton.     

A cyclase-associated protein regulates actin and cell polarity during Drosophila oogenesis and in yeast

BACKGROUND: A polarised cytoskeleton is required to pattern cellular space, and for many aspects of cell behaviour. While the mechanisms ordering the actin cytoskeleton have been extensively studied in yeast, little is known about the analogous processes in other organisms. We have used Drosophila oogenesis as a model genetic system in which to investigate control of cytoskeletal organisation and cell polarity in multicellular eukaryotes. RESULTS: In a screen to identify genes required for Drosophila oocyte polarity, we isolated a Drosophila homologue of the yeast cyclase-associated protein, CAP. Here we show that CAP preferentially accumulates in the oocyte, where it inhibits actin polymerisation. CAP also has a role in oocyte polarity, as cap mutants fail to establish the proper, asymmetric distribution of mRNA determinants within the oocyte. Similarly in yeast, loss of CAP causes analogous polarity defects, altering the distribution of actin filaments and mRNA determinants. CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies CAP as a new effector of actin dynamics in Drosophila. As CAP controls the spatial distribution of actin filaments and mRNA determinants in both yeast and Drosophila, we conclude that CAP has an evolutionarily conserved function in the genesis of eukaryotic cell polarity.     

The human WASP-interacting protein, WIP, activates the cell polarity pathway in yeast.

WIP, the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein-interacting protein, is a human protein involved in actin polymerization and redistribution in lymphoid cells. The mechanism by which WIP reorganizes actin cytoskeleton is unknown. WIP is similar to yeast verprolin, an actin- and myosin-interacting protein required for polarized morphogenesis. To determine whether WIP and verprolin are functional homologues, we analyzed the function of WIP in yeast. WIP suppresses the growth defects of VRP1 missense and null mutations as well as the defects in cytoskeletal organization and endocytosis observed in vrp1-1 cells. The ability of WIP to replace verprolin is dependent on its WH2 actin binding domain and a putative profilin binding domain. Immunofluorescence localization of WIP in yeast cells reveals a pattern consistent with its function at the cortical sites of growth. Thus, like verprolin, WIP functions in yeast to link the polarity development pathway and the actin cytoskeleton to generate cytoskeletal asymmetry. A role for WIP in cell polarity provides a framework for unifying, under a common paradigm, distinct molecular defects associated with immunodeficiencies like Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome.     

Symmetry Breaking in the Life Cycle of the Budding Yeast

The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been an invaluable model system for the study of the establishment of cellular asymmetry and growth polarity in response to specific physiological cues. A large body of experimental observations has shown that yeast cells are able to break symmetry and establish polarity through two coupled and partially redundant intrinsic mechanisms, even in the absence of any pre-existing external asymmetry. One of these mechanisms is dependent upon interplay between the actin cytoskeleton and the Rho family GTPase Cdc42, whereas the other relies on a Cdc42 GTPase signaling network. Integral to these mechanisms appear to be positive feedback loops capable of amplifying small and stochastic asymmetries. Spatial cues, such as bud scars and pheromone gradients, orient cell polarity by modulating the regulation of the Cdc42 GTPase cycle, thereby biasing the site of asymmetry amplification.The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a gift of nature, not just for its superb ability in fermentation to provide us food for hunger and pastime, but also for its relatively simple physiology, which has illuminated our understanding of many fundamental cellular processes. In particular, asymmetry is a way of life for the budding yeast, both when it grows vegetatively and initiates sexual reproductive cycles; as such, yeast has been an invaluable model for studying the establishment of cellular asymmetry. A haploid yeast cell in the G1 phase, which is round and grows isotropically, faces two options: to enter the mitotic cell cycle and grow a bud, or to refrain from cell cycle entry and form a mating projection (shmoo) toward a cell of the opposite mating type. In either case, the cell has to break symmetry to switch from isotropic growth to growth along a polarized axis (Fig. 1). These processes of cell polarity establishment are triggered either by internal signals from the cell cycle engine (budding) or by an external signal in the form of a pheromone gradient (mating).Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Symmetry breaking processes in the life cycle of budding yeast. Shown are the locations of actin patches, actin cables, and Cdc42 during polarized growth for both cycling cells and cells undergoing pheromone response. In G1 cells, Cdc42 is distributed symmetrically, and the actin cytoskeleton is not polarized. In response to cell cycle signals or mating pheromone stimulation, Cdc42 and the actin cytoskeleton become polarized: Cdc42 forms a “polar cap” and actin cables become oriented to allow for targeted secretion. Polarized growth further leads to formation of a bud (cell cycle signal) or formation of a mating projection (pheromone signal). Images represent GFP-Cdc42 (green), and rhodamine-phalloidin staining of filamentous actin (red).Pioneering work involving isolation and characterization of mutants deficient in various aspects of budding and shmoo formation identified key components of the molecular pathways underlying yeast polarized morphogenesis. Despite the relative simplicity of yeast, it has become increasingly clear that many of the genes that control the establishment of cell polarity are conserved between yeast and more complex eukaryotic organisms (see McCaffrey and Macara 2009; Munro and Bowerman 2009; Wang 2009; Nelson 2009). In particular, the small GTPase Cdc42, first discovered in yeast (Adams et al. 1990) and subsequently shown to be required for cell polarization in many eukaryotic organisms (Etienne-Manneville 2004), is the central regulator of yeast polarity.Common principles have begun to emerge to explain symmetry breaking under varying physiological conditions. One of these principles is the self-organizing nature of cell polarity. Whereas under physiological conditions yeast cells polarize toward an environmental asymmetry (pheromone gradient) or a “landmark,” i.e., the bud scar, deposited on the cell surface from a previous division (in a process called bud site selection), it is clear that the ability to undergo symmetry breaking to establish polarity in a random orientation is independent of these cues. It is tempting to speculate that the basic molecular machinery for symmetry breaking, which is required for asexual proliferation through budding, might have evolved independently of the machinery underlying mating and bud site selection.As in all polarized cell systems, yeast polarity is manifested as both an asymmetry in the distribution of signaling molecules and in the organization of the cytoskeleton. In yeast, the switch from an isotropic distribution of Cdc42 on the plasma membrane to a polarized distribution (Fig. 1) is required for the polarized organization of the actin cytoskeleton and membrane trafficking systems, and eventually orientated cell growth. Recent work also showed that the cytoskeleton and the membrane trafficking system can in turn impact the localization of Cdc42 and possibly other membrane‐associated regulatory molecules (Karpova et al. 2000; Wedlich-Soldner et al. 2004; Irazoqui et al. 2005; Zajac et al. 2005). A combination of experimental and theoretical analyses strongly suggests that the interplay between signaling and structural pathways is at the heart of the cell’s intrinsic ability to break symmetry.As there have been recent review articles on the polarized organization of budding yeast growth systems (Bretscher 2003; Pruyne et al. 2004b) and on the molecular parts list involved in cell polarization (Park and Bi 2007), this article is specifically focused on the mechanisms of symmetry breaking at two levels: first as a self-organization process accomplished through dynamic interplay between intrinsic signaling and cytoskeletal systems, which enables vegetative proliferation through bud formation; and second, as an adaptive process where polarity is spatially harnessed by physical cues that arise during bud-site selection and mating. Finally, we briefly extend our discussion to include the role of polarity in yeast aging and cell fate determination. This exciting, relatively new area of research has made important advances in our understanding of how asymmetry can be an important mechanism to ensure long-lasting fitness of a fast proliferating population.     

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Arf3 protein is involved in actin cable and cortical patch formation

We show that Arf3p, a member of the ADP ribosylation family, is involved in the organization of actin cables and cortical patches in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Profilin-deficient cells (pfy1Delta) have severe growth defects and lack actin cables. Overexpression of ARF3 restores actin cables and corrects growth defects in these cells. Cells deficient for the cortical patch proteins Las17p and Vrp1p have growth defects and a random cortical patch distribution. Overexpression of ARF3 in las17Delta and in vrp1Delta cells partially corrects growth defects and restores the polarized distribution of cortical patches. The N-terminal glycine, a myristoylation site in Arf3p, is necessary for its suppressor activity. arf3Delta cells show a random budding pattern. Overexpression of BNI1, GEA2 or SYP1, three genes involved in actin cytoskeleton formation, restores the normal axial budding pattern of arf3Delta cells. BUD6 is a polarity gene and GEA2 is involved in retrograde transport and the organization of the actin cytoskeleton. We have identified genetic interactions between ARF3 and BUD6, and between ARF3 and GEA2. Both double mutant strains have actin cytoskeleton defects. Our results support a role for ARF3 in cell polarity and the organization of the actin cytoskeleton.     

Yeast calmodulin: structural and functional elements essential for the cell cycle.

The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a suitable organism for studying calmodulin function in cell proliferation. Genetic studies in yeast demonstrate that vertebrate calmodulin can functionally replace yeast calmodulin. In addition, expression of half of the yeast calmodulin molecule is found to be sufficient for cell growth. Characterization of conditional-lethal mutants of yeast calmodulin as well as the intracellular distribution of calmodulin have suggested that at least two cell cycle steps require calmodulin function. One is nuclear division and the other is the maintenance of cell polarity. A current focus is to understand which kinds of target proteins are involved in mediating the essential functions of yeast calmodulin in these processes. Thus far, three yeast enzymes whose activity is regulated by calmodulin have been identified.     

Expression of microbial virulence proteins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae models mammalian infection

Bacterial virulence proteins that are translocated into eukaryotic cells were expressed in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to model human infection. The subcellular localization patterns of these proteins in yeast paralleled those previously observed during mammalian infection, including localization to the nucleus and plasma membrane. Localization of Salmonella SspA in yeast provided the first evidence that SspA interacts with actin in living cells. In many cases, expression of the bacterial virulence proteins conferred genetically exploitable growth phenotypes. In this way, Yersinia YopE toxicity was demonstrated to be linked to its Rho GTPase activating protein activity. YopE blocked polarization of the yeast cytoskeleton and cell cycle progression, while SspA altered polarity and inhibited depolymerization of the actin cytoskeleton. These activities are consistent with previously proposed or demonstrated effects on higher eukaryotes and provide new insights into the roles of these proteins in pathogenesis: SspA in directing formation of membrane ruffles and YopE in arresting cell division. Thus, study of bacterial virulence proteins in yeast is a powerful system to determine functions of these proteins, probe eukaryotic cellular processes and model mammalian infection.     

Ras Regulates the Polarity of the Yeast Actin Cytoskeleton through the Stress Response Pathway

Polarized growth in yeast requires cooperation between the polarized actin cytoskeleton and delivery of post-Golgi secretory vesicles. We have previously reported that loss of the major tropomyosin isoform, Tpm1p, results in cells sensitive to perturbations in cell polarity. To identify components that bridge these processes, we sought mutations with both a conditional defect in secretion and a partial defect in polarity. Thus, we set up a genetic screen for mutations that conferred a conditional growth defect, showed synthetic lethality with tpm1Delta, and simultaneously became denser at the restrictive temperature, a hallmark of secretion-defective cells. Of the 10 complementation groups recovered, the group with the largest number of independent isolates was functionally null alleles of RAS2. Consistent with this, ras2Delta and tpm1Delta are synthetically lethal at 35 degrees C. We show that ras2Delta confers temperature-sensitive growth and temperature-dependent depolarization of the actin cytoskeleton. Furthermore, we show that at elevated temperatures ras2Delta cells are partially defective in endocytosis and show a delocalization of two key polarity markers, Myo2p and Cdc42p. However, the conditional enhanced density phenotype of ras2Delta cells is not a defect in secretion. All the phenotypes of ras2Delta cells can be fully suppressed by expression of yeast RAS1 or RAS2 genes, human Ha-ras, or the double disruption of the stress response genes msn2Deltamsn4Delta. Although the best characterized pathway of Ras function in yeast involves activation of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase A pathway, activation of the protein kinase A pathway does not fully suppress the actin polarity defects, suggesting that there is an additional pathway from Ras2p to Msn2/4p. Thus, Ras2p regulates cytoskeletal polarity in yeast under conditions of mild temperature stress through the stress response pathway.     

Sec3 Mutations Are Synthetically Lethal with Profilin Mutations and Cause Defects in Diploid-Specific Bud-Site Selection

Replacement of the wild-type yeast profilin gene (PFY1) with a mutated form (pfy1-111) that has codon 72 changed to encode glutamate rather than arginine results in defects similar to, but less severe than, those that result from complete deletion of the profilin gene. We have used a colony color-sectoring assay to identify mutations that cause pfy1-111, but not wild-type, cells to be inviable. These profilin synthetic lethal (psl) mutations result in various degrees of abnormal growth, morphology, and temperature sensitivity in PFY1 cells. We have examined psl1 strains in the most detail. Interestingly, these strains display a diploid-specific defect in bud-site selection; haploid strains bud normally, while homozygous diploid strains show a dramatic increase in random budding. We discovered that PSL1 is the late secretory gene, SEC3, and have found that mutations in several other late secretory genes are also synthetically lethal with pfy1-111. Our results are likely to reflect an interdependence between the actin cytoskeleton and secretory processes in directing cell polarity and growth. Moreover, they indicate that the secretory pathway is especially crucial for maintaining budding polarity in diploids.     

Yeasts make their mark

Budding and fission yeast serve as genetic model organisms for the study of the molecular mechanisms of cell polarity in single cells. Similar to other polarized eukaryotic cells, yeast cells have polarity programmes that regulate where they grow and divide. Here, we describe recent advances in defining the proteins that establish cell polarity and the numerous molecular interactions that may link these factors to the actin cytoskeleton. As many of these components are identified, a comprehensive understanding of complex pathways is beginning to emerge.