Concerted gene duplications in the two keratin gene families

Summary Evolutionary trees were derived from the keratin protein sequences using the Phylogeny Analysis Using Parsimony (PAUP) set of programs. Three major unexpected conclusions were derived from the analysis: The smallest keratin protein subunit, K#19 (Moll et al. 1982), is not the most primitive one, but has evolved to fulfill a highly specialized function, presumably to redress the unbalanced synthesis of keratin subunits. Second, the ancestors of keratins expressed in the early embryonic stages, K#8 and K#18, were the first to diverge from the ancestors of all the other keratins. The branches leading to these two keratins are relatively short, indicating a comparatively strong selection against changes in the sequences of these two proteins. Third, the two keratin families show extraodinary parallelism in their patterns of gene duplications. In both families the genes expressed in embryos diverged first, later bursts of gene duplications created the subfamilies expressed in various differentiated cells, and relatively recent gene duplications gave rise to the hair keratin genes and separated the basal cell-specific keratin from those expressed under hyperproliferative conditions. The parallelism of gene duplications in the two keratin gene families implies a mechanism in which duplications in one family influence duplication events in the other family.     

Cell type-specific expression of bovine keratin genes as demonstrated by the use of complementary DNA clones

Cytokeratins are a family of polypeptides that form the intermediate-sized filament characteristic of epithelial cells. The cytoskeletons of different types of epithelial cells have been reported to possess specific combinations of the members of this protein family. Therefore, we have sought to examine the correspondence between such differential protein expression and the expression of cytokeratin genes at the nucleic acid level. A library of recombinant plasmids carrying cDNA sequences synthesized from bovine epidermal mRNAs was constructed. Clones of about 10(3) base-pairs coding for all the major epidermal keratins of molecular weights of 50,000, 54,000, 59,000, 60,000 and 68,000 were identified by means of hybridization-selection, followed by one and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of products of translation in vitro. Under stringent conditions, each of these clones hybridizes specifically with its corresponding mRNA and does not show significant cross-hybridization with mRNAs coding for the other keratins, including those belonging to the same subfamily. Using these clones in RNA blot hybridization analysis, we have studied the expression of keratin genes in diverse bovine epithelial tissues (muzzle epidermis, cornea, esophagus, bladder urothelium, liver) and cultured cell lines from kidney (MDBK) and mammary gland (BMGE + H, BMGE -H). In each case we have found a correlation between the respective keratin polypeptides and the corresponding mRNAs. Whereas mRNA coding for keratins Ia and VIb have been found only in epidermis, genes coding for other epidermal keratins are expressed also in certain non-epidermal epithelia and in cells of the BMGE + H line. In contrast, epidermal keratin mRNA sequences have not been detected in liver or bladder tissue, nor in cultured kidney cells (MDBK) or mammary gland cells of the BMGE - H line, which all express a set of cytokeratin polypeptides entirely different from those of epidermis. In all cases, only one mRNA size species has been found, suggesting that in different cell types the same mRNA species is synthesized from the same keratin gene. We conclude that the mechanisms controlling the cell type-specific synthesis of the diverse keratin genes act at a pre-translational level.     

Embryonic simple epithelial keratins 8 and 18: chromosomal location emphasizes difference from other keratin pairs.

The keratins 8 and 18 of simple epithelia differ from stratified epithelial keratins in tissue expression and regulation. To examine the specific properties of human keratin 8, we cloned and sequenced the cDNA from a placental mRNA expression library and defined the optimum state of such clones for expression in bacterial plasmid vectors. Using the polymerase chain reaction we identified and sequenced three introns and located the single active gene for keratin 8, out of a background of 9 to 24 pseudogenes, on chromosome 12. This chromosome contains several genes for type II keratins and also the gene for keratin 18, the type I keratin that is coexpressed with keratin 8. This location of both members of a keratin pair on a single chromosome is thus far unique among the keratin genes; it is consistent with the hypothesis that keratins 8 and 18 may be closer to an ancestral keratin gene than the keratins of more highly differentiated epithelia.     

New epidermal keratin genes from Xenopus laevis: hormonal and regional regulation of their expression during anuran skin metamorphosis

Xenopus larval keratin (XLK) was isolated by gel electrophoresis of proteins of tadpole skin. Screening of an expression cDNA library of tail tissues by specific polyclonal antibodies against XLK produced XLK cDNA (xlk). Its complete nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences revealed that XLK was a new member of type II keratin. Screening of a cDNA library of adult Xenopus skin using an oligonucleotide probe which had been designed from well-conserved N-terminal amino acid sequences of the rod domain of type I keratin produced two cDNAs, xak-a and xak-b, which were found to be new members of type I keratin gene. Northern blot analysis showed that xlk was expressed exclusively in the larval skin whereas xak-a and xak-b were expressed exclusively in the adult skin. Their expression level was regulated in a region- and metamorphic stage- dependent manner during larval skin development. mRNA in situ hybridization experiments identified the cells that expressed xlk, and xak-a and xak-b as larva- specific epidermal cells (skein cells and basal cells), and adult suprabasal epidermal cells, respectively. These three genes were found to be late responsive to thyroid hormone. Phylogenetic relationships of these keratins with known ones are discussed.     

Endocrine controls of keratin expression

Keratins are a family of intermediate filaments that serve various crucial roles in skin physiology. For mammalian skin to function properly, and to produce epidermal and hair keratins that are optimally adapted for their environment, it is critical that keratin gene and protein expression are stringently controlled. Given that the skin is not only targeted by multiple hormones, but also constitutes a veritable peripheral endocrine organ, it is not surprizing that intracutaneous keratin expression is underlined by tight endocrine controls. These controls encompass thyroid hormones, steroid hormones such as glucocorticoids (GCs), retinoic acid (RA) and vitamin D, and several neuroendocrine mediators. Here, we review why a better understanding of the endocrine controls of keratin expression is not only required for an improved insight into normal human skin and hair function, but may also open new therapeutic avenues in a wide range of skin and hair diseases.     

Functional Differences between Keratins of Stratified and Simple Epithelia

Dividing populations of stratified and simple epithelial tissues express keratins 5 and 14, and keratins 8 and 18, respectively. It has been suggested that these keratins form a mechanical framework important to cellular integrity, since their absence gives rise to a blistering skin disorder in neonatal epidermis, and hemorrhaging within the embryonic liver. An unresolved fundamental issue is whether different keratins perform unique functions in epithelia. We now address this question using transgenic technology to express a K16-14 hybrid epidermal keratin transgene and a K18 simple epithelial keratin transgene in the epidermis of mice null for K14. Under conditions where the hybrid epidermal keratin restored a wild-type phenotype to newborn epidermis, K18 partially but not fully rescued. The explanation does not appear to reside in an inability of K18 to form 10-nm filaments with K5, which it does in vitro and in vivo. Rather, it appears that the keratin network formed between K5 and K18 is deficient in withstanding mechanical stress, leading to perturbations in the keratin network in regions of the skin that are subjected either to natural or to mechanically induced trauma. Taken together, these findings suggest that the loss of a type I epidermal keratin cannot be fully compensated by its counterpart of simple epithelial cells, and that in vivo, all keratins are not equivalent.     

Integration of different keratins into the same filament system after microinjection of mRNA for epidermal keratins into kidney epithelial cells

We have isolated poly (A)+ RNA, highly enriched in keratin mRNA from bovine muzzle epidermis, and injected it into epithelial cells of a different type, i.e., cultured kidney epithelial cells of the same (MDBK) or taxonomically distant (PtK2) species. Both recipient cell lines contain keratin polypeptides that are different from those present in epidermal cells. Using keratin subtype-specific antibodies in immunofluorescence and immunoelectron microscopy, we show that foreign keratin mRNAs when injected into a different type of epithelial cell can recruit polyribosomes and are translated together with the keratin mRNAs of the host cell. Foreign epidermal keratins are excluded from vimentin filaments and other structures but readily coassemble with the endogenous keratins and appear to be integrated into the meshwork of the preexisting kidney-type keratin filaments. Our observations indicate that different sets of keratin polypeptides from the same or different species can coassemble in the living cell into a common filament system. Thus we have developed a procedure that allows experimental alteration of the intermediate filament cytoskeleton within living epithelial cells.     

Variable expression of retinoie acid receptor (RARβ) mRNA in human oral and epidermal keratinocytes; relation to keratin 19 expression and keratinization potential

Previous studies have revealed that the cells that form the different regions of the oral and epidermal stratified squamous epithelia represent a number of intrinsically distinct keratinocyte subtypes, each of which is developmentally programmed to preferentially express a particular pattern of keratins and type of suprabasal histology. Retinoic acid (RA) is known to modulate stratified squamous epithelial differentiation, including expression of the basal cell keratin K19 and the suprabasal keratins K1/K10 and K4/K13. We have found that all keratinocyte subtypes are similar in their steady state levels of RAR alpha and RAR gamma mRNAs in culture and that these levels are only minimally affected by RA. In contrast, RAR beta mRNA expression varies greatly among keratinocyte subtypes and, in eight of ten cell strains examined, directly correlated with their levels of K19 mRNA. Exposure to 10(-6) M RA increases the levels of RAR beta and K19 mRNA; conversely, complete removal of RA from the medium results in reduced levels of these messages. RA does not coordinately induce RAR beta and K19 messages in nonkeratinocyte cell types: fibroblasts cultured in the presence of 10(-6) M RA express very high levels of RAR beta mRNA but do not express detectable K19, and mesothelial cells decrease their levels of RAR beta and K19 mRNA in response to 10(-6) M RA. The correlation between RAR beta and K19 mRNA levels in most keratinocyte subtypes suggests a role for RAR beta in specifying patterns of keratin expression and suprabasal differentiation in stratified squamous epithelia.