Afterword: Mysteries of Culture

All humans face the same epistemological dilemma: They must rely on an inherently limited—albeit life-giving—frame of reference to understand a world (which includes other people and cultures) that can never be completely understood in humanly particular terms. Given our common lot, anthropologists and "Natives," and outsiders and insiders, are never absolutely different, for difference is a matter of degree. Further more, the reality of difference, for all humans, is to be found in semiotic processes like translation and interpretation. Even terms that seem neutral to us, like individual and society, are culturally distinctive concepts that would not be commonsensical to all people, everywhere. Even the most familiar meanings are never completely transparent, not even to those "Natives" who use them with ease. Thus, anthropological outsiders and the insiders they study (and who study them) must struggle to transcend their own familiar rationalizations in their attempts to understand one another.     

Culture as Consensus: A Theory of Culture and Informant Accuracy

This paper presents and tests a formal mathematical model for the analysis of informant responses to systematic interview questions. We assume a situation in which the ethnographer does not know how much each informant knows about the cultural domain under consideration nor the answers to the questions. The model simultaneously provides an estimate of the cultural competence or knowledge of each informant and an estimate of the correct answer to each question asked of the informant. The model currently handles true-false, multiple-choice, andfill-in-the-blank type question formats. In familiar cultural domains the model produces good results from as few as four informants. The paper includes a table showing the number of informants needed to provide stated levels of confidence given the mean level of knowledge among the informants. Implications are discussed.     

Introduction: Culture Without Cultures—The Culture Effect

Anthropology has often been handmaiden to administrative and political activity that requires bounded social groups mapped onto territories and possessing defining characteristics such as language, values and behaviours. This introductory essay sets the scene for the papers in this Issue which show that actual sets of social relations in their particular places cannot easily be made to conform with this hermetic construct. Acknowledging this, post‐colonial theory has been driven to theorise borderlands, hybridisation and metissage, liminal and interstitial social spaces. Yet these necessarily reinforce and privilege primary concepts of the pure and the central, the bounded and situated. This paper places the hermetic view of culture in its formative period, which also saw the emergence of nationalism and scientific atomism. The paper proposes that positing pure and bounded cultures, even as an idealised abstraction, is an error of theory which is influenced by an attachment to metaphors of the material world, usually ‘Euclidean’. Finally, the paper explores ways that analyses of cultural interrelation, such as those in this Special Issue, can proceed without imagining a resulting ‘culture’, and what this may do for the political landscape of localised cultural rights.     

Excavating Culture: Summary of Results

This is a companion paper to the seven articles also published in this special issue of Applied Developmental Science. This paper summarizes and discusses the results from common analyses that were conducted on different datasets. The common analyses were designed to disentangle contextual and ethnic influences on parenting. Initial ethnic group differences were found in many of the datasets with multiple ethnic groups. Although certain ethnic group differences were explained by contextual influences, some ethnic group differences remained after contextual influences were controlled. Follow-up analyses with datasets containing cultural variables revealed within group differences in the degree to which ethnic differences in parenting may be accounted for by contextual factors versus culturally-specific processes. Methodological and theoretical implications are discussed and future directions are offered.     

Parenting,Culture, and Context: Reflections on Excavating Culture

Civic competence and obstacles to its development are explored in urban youth. Our review suggests that urban youth lag behind suburban adolescents in civic knowledge and civic participation. These lags may be attributable to low levels of political participation among urban adults, educational failures, and a lack of childhood opportunities to join clubs and teams. A comparison of a small city and a neighboring suburban town illustrates both the intertwined obstacles that confront urban youth on the path to civic development and the difficulty that most urban centers face in improving opportunities for civic development. We conclude that urban youth's genuine interest in acquiring civic competence is frustrated by demographic factors largely outside the control of those living in America's cities.     

Culture: The Anthropologists' Account

Culture: The Anthropologists' Account. Adam Kuper. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1999. 299 pp.     

Culture human skin: heterotransplantation

We have reported that human skin, cultured in a controlled environment system (steady state), yields epidermis-like growth from adult donor split thickness specimens. A procedure for transplantation of such cellular outgrowths to athymic nude mice for functional and morphological evaluations is reported. Successful transplants were definitely scored by the presence of histologic epidermal markers and human glucose phosphate isomerase. We suggest that the transplantation procedures reported here may contribute to the knowledge required for the use of autologous cultured skin in patients with large skin wounds.     

Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning

Culture in Mind: Cognition, Culture, and the Problem of Meaning. Bradd Shore. New York: Oxford University Press, 1996. 428 pp.     

Force of Habit: Exploring Everyday Culture

Force of Habit: Exploring Everyday Culture. Jonas Frykman and Orvar Lofgren. eds. Lund Studies in European Ethnology, 1. Lund, Sweden: Lund University Press, 1996. 172 pp.     

Culture on Tour: Ethnographies of Travel

Culture on Tour: Ethnographies of Travel . Edward M. Bruner. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005. 308 pp.     

Sigmund Freud: Conflict and Culture

Sigmund Freud: Conflict and Culture. The Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., October 15, 1998-January 16, 1999; The Jewish Museum, New York, New York, April 18-September 9. 1999, review venue; Freud Museum, Vienna, Austria. October 21, 1999-February 6. 2000; Skirball Cultural Center, Los Angeles. California. April 4-July 25, 2000.
Freud: Conflict and Culture. Essays on His Life, Work and Legacy. Michael S. Roth. ed. New York: Alfred Knopf, 1998. 273 pp.