The fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by derivatives of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I

The fidelity of DNA synthesis by an exonuclease-proficient DNA polymerase results from the selectivity of the polymerization reaction and from exonucleolytic proofreading. We have examined the contribution of these two steps to the fidelity of DNA synthesis catalyzed by the large Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I, using enzymes engineered by site-directed mutagenesis to inactivate the proofreading exonuclease. Measurements with two mutant Klenow polymerases lacking exonuclease activity but retaining normal polymerase activity and protein structure demonstrate that the base substitution fidelity of polymerization averages one error for each 10,000 to 40,000 bases polymerized, and can vary more than 30-fold depending on the mispair and its position. Steady-state enzyme kinetic measurements of selectivity at the initial insertion step by the exonuclease-deficient polymerase demonstrate differences in both the Km and the Vmax for incorrect versus correct nucleotides. Exonucleolytic proofreading by the wild-type enzyme improves the average base substitution fidelity by 4- to 7-fold, reflecting efficient proofreading of some mispairs and less efficient proofreading of others. The wild-type polymerase is highly accurate for -1 base frameshift errors, with an error rate of less than or equal to 10(-6). The exonuclease-deficient polymerase is less accurate, suggesting that proofreading also enhances frameshift fidelity. Even without a proofreading exonuclease, Klenow polymerase has high frameshift fidelity relative to several other DNA polymerases, including eucaryotic DNA polymerase-alpha, an exonuclease-deficient, 4-subunit complex whose catalytic subunit is almost three times larger. The Klenow polymerase has a large (46 kDa) domain containing the polymerase active site and a smaller (22 kDa) domain containing the active site for the 3'----5' exonuclease. Upon removal of the small domain, the large polymerase domain has altered base substitution error specificity when compared to the two-domain but exonuclease-deficient enzyme. It is also less accurate for -1 base errors at reiterated template nucleotides and for a 276-nucleotide deletion error. Thus, removal of a protein domain of a DNA polymerase can affect its fidelity.     

Substrate specificity and proposed structure of the proofreading complex of T7 DNA polymerase

Faithful replication of genomic DNA by high-fidelity DNA polymerases is crucial for the survival of most living organisms. While high-fidelity DNA polymerases favor canonical base pairs over mismatches by a factor of ∼1 × 10⁵, fidelity is further enhanced several orders of magnitude by a 3′–5′ proofreading exonuclease that selectively removes mispaired bases in the primer strand. Despite the importance of proofreading to maintaining genome stability, it remains much less studied than the fidelity mechanisms employed at the polymerase active site. Here we characterize the substrate specificity for the proofreading exonuclease of a high-fidelity DNA polymerase by investigating the proofreading kinetics on various DNA substrates. The contribution of the exonuclease to net fidelity is a function of the kinetic partitioning between extension and excision. We show that while proofreading of a terminal mismatch is efficient, proofreading a mismatch buried by one or two correct bases is even more efficient. Because the polymerase stalls after incorporation of a mismatch and after incorporation of one or two correct bases on top of a mismatch, the net contribution of the exonuclease is a function of multiple opportunities to correct mistakes. We also characterize the exonuclease stereospecificity using phosphorothioate-modified DNA, provide a homology model for the DNA primer strand in the exonuclease active site, and propose a dynamic structural model for the transfer of DNA from the polymerase to the exonuclease active site based on MD simulations.     

Excision of thymine dimers by proteolytic and amber fragments of E. coli DNA polymerase I

Excision of thymine dimers from specifically incised ultraviolet irradiated DNA by $\text{E. coli}$ DNA polymerase I is stimulated by concurrent DNA synthesis. The 36,000 molecular-weight “small fragment” obtained by limited proteolysis of DNA polymerase I, which retains only the 5′ → 3′ exonuclease activity, also excises thymine dimers, but at one-tenth the rate of the intact enzyme. However, the rate of excision is increased by addition of the “large” 76,000-molecular weight fragment. With the further addition of the 4 deoxynucleoside triphosphates, permitting DNA synthesis to occur, excision approaches rates observed with the intact enzyme. The same result was obtained with a fragment of DNA polymerase I with 5′ → 3′ exonuclease activity that is present uniquely in polymerase I $\text{amber}$ mutants.     

Interaction of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I with azidoDNA and fluorescent DNA probes: identification of protein-DNA contacts

The synthesis of an azidoDNA duplex and its use to photolabel DNA polymerases have been previously described (Gibson & Benkovic, 1987). We now present detailed experiments utilizing this azidoDNA photoprobe as a substrate for Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) and the photoaffinity labeling of the protein. The azidoDNA duplex is an efficient substrate for both the polymerase and 3'----5' exonuclease activities of the enzyme. However, the hydrolytic degradation of the azido-bearing base is dramatically impaired. On the basis of the ability of these duplexes to photolabel the enzyme, we have determined that the protein contacts between five and seven bases of duplex DNA. Incubation of azidoDNA with the Klenow fragment in the presence of magnesium results in the in situ formation of a template-primer with the azido-bearing base bound at the polymerase catalytic site of the enzyme. Photolysis of this complex followed by proteolytic digestion and isolation of DNA-labeled peptides results in the identification of a single residue modified by the photoreactive DNA substrate. We identify Tyr766 as the modified amino acid and thus localize the catalytic site for polymerization in the protein. A mansyl-labeled DNA duplex has been prepared as a fluorescent probe of protein structure. This has been utilized to determine the location of the primer terminus when bound to the Klenow fragment. When the duplex contains five unpaired bases in the primer strand of the duplex, the primer terminus resides predominantly at the exonuclease catalytic site of the enzyme. Removal of the mismatched bases by the exonuclease activity of the enzyme yields a binary complex with the primer terminus now bound predominantly at the polymerase active site. Data are presented which suggest that the rate-limiting step in the exonuclease activity of the enzyme is translocation of the primer terminus from polymerase to exonuclease catalytic sites.     

Quantitative parameters of the 3′–5′ exonuclease reaction of human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 with nicked DNA containing dYMP or a modified dCMP analogue

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease 1 (APE1) is a multifunctional enzyme. In addition to its main AP endonuclease activity, that incises DNA 5′ to the AP-site, it possesses other weak enzymatic activities. One of them is 3′–5′ exonuclease activity, which is most effectively exhibited for DNA duplexes containing modified or mismatched nucleotides at the 3′-end of the primer chain. There is a presumption that APE1 can correct the DNA synthesis catalyzed by DNA polymerase β through the base excision repair process. We determined the quantitative parameters of the 3′–5′ exonuclease reaction in dependence on the reaction conditions to reveal the detailed mechanism of this process. The kinetic parameters of APE1 exonuclease excision of mismatched dCMP and dTMP from the 3′ terminus of single-strand DNA and of photoreactive dCMP analogues applied for photoaffinity modification of proteins and DNA in recombinant systems and cell/nuclear extracts were determined.     

Chlamydophila pneumoniae endonuclease IV prefers to remove mismatched 3′ ribonucleotides: Implication in proofreading mismatched 3′-terminal nucleotides in short-patch repair synthesis

DNA polymerase I (DNApolI) catalyzes DNA synthesis during Okazaki fragment maturation, base excision repair, and nucleotide excision repair. Some bacterial DNApolIs are deficient in 3′–5′ exonuclease, which is required for removing an incorrectly incorporated 3′-terminal nucleotide during DNA elongation by DNA polymerase activity. The key amino acid residues in the exonuclease center of Chlamydophila pneumoniae DNApolI (CpDNApolI) are naturally mutated, resulting in the loss of 3′–5′ exonuclease. Hence, the manner by which CpDNApolI proofreads the incorrectly incorporated nucleotide during DNA synthesis warrants clarification. C. pneumoniae encodes three 3′–5′ exonuclease activities: one endonuclease IV and two homologs of the epsilon subunit of replicative DNA polymerase III. The three proteins were biochemically characterized using single- and double-stranded DNA substrate. Among them, C. pneumoniae endonuclease IV (CpendoIV) possesses 3′–5′ exonuclease activity that prefers to remove mismatched 3′-terminal nucleotides in the nick, gap, and 3′ recess of a double-stranded DNA (dsDNA). Finally, we reconstituted the proofreading reaction of the mismatched 3′-terminal nucleotide using the dsDNA with a nick or 3′ recess as substrate. Upon proofreading of the mismatched 3′-terminal nucleotide by CpendoIV, CpDNApolI can correctly reincorporate the matched nucleotide and the nick is further sealed by DNA ligase. Based on our biochemical results, we proposed that CpendoIV was responsible for proofreading the replication errors of CpDNApolI.     

DNA polymerase mutagenic bypass and proofreading of endogenous DNA lesions

DNA polymerases differentiate between correct and incorrect substrates during synthesis on undamaged DNA templates through the biochemical steps of base incorporation, primer-template extension and proofreading excision. Recent research examining DNA polymerase processing of abasic, alkylation and oxidative lesions is reviewed in light of these discrimination mechanisms. Inhibition of DNA synthesis results from correct polymerase discrimination against utilization of geometrically incorrect template bases or 3' terminal basepairs. The efficiency of translesion synthesis is thus related to the physical structure of the lesion containing DNA. However, variations in enzyme structure and kinetics result in translesion synthesis efficiencies that are also dependent upon the DNA polymerase. With a low probability, polymerase misinsertion events create a 3' lesion terminus which is geometrically favored over the correct lesion basepair, resulting in mutagenic translesion synthesis. For example, both polymerase alpha and polymerase beta appear to require the formation of a stable 3' primer-template structure for efficient abasic site translesion synthesis. However, the enzymes differ as to the precise molecular make-up of the stable DNA structure, resulting in different mutational specificities. Similar mechanisms may be applicable to oxidative damage, where mutational specificities dependent upon the DNA polymerase also have been observed. In vitro reaction conditions also influence DNA polymerase processing of lesions. Using an in vitro herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) gene forward mutation assay, we demonstrate that high dNTP substrate concentrations affect the mutagenic specificity of translesion synthesis using alkylated templates. The exonuclease-deficient Klenow polymerase error frequency for G-->A transition mutations using templates modified by N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) was four-fold higher at 1000 microM [dNTP], relative to 50 microM [dNTP], consistent with an increased efficiency of extension of the etO6G.T mispair. Moreover, the frequency of other ENU-induced polymerase errors was suppressed when polymerase reactions contained 50 microM dNTP, relative to 1000 microM dNTP. The efficiency of proofreading as a polymerase error discrimination mechanism reflects a balance between the competing processes of 3'-->5' exonuclease removal of mispairs and polymerization of the next correct nucleotide. Polymerases that are devoid of a proofreading exonuclease generally display enhanced abasic site translesion synthesis relative to proofreading-proficient enzymes. In addition, the proofreading exonucleases of Escherichia coli Pol I and T4 DNA polymerases have been found to remove mispairs caused by abasic sites and oxidative lesions, respectively, resulting in lowered polymerase error rates. However, the magnitude of the exonuclease effect is small (less than 10-fold), and highly dependent upon the DNA polymerase-exonuclease. We have studied proofreading exonuclease removal of alkylation damage in the HSV-tk forward assay. We observed no significant reduction in the magnitude of the mutant frequency vs. dose-response curves when N-methyl-N-nitrosourea or ENU-treated templates were used in exonuclease-proficient Klenow polymerase reactions, as compared to the exonuclease-deficient polymerase reactions. Thus, available data suggest that proofreading excision of endogenous lesion mispairs does occur, but the efficiency is dependent upon the lesion and the DNA polymerase-exonuclease studied.     

Construction of a highly error-prone DNA polymerase for developing organelle mutation systems

A novel family of DNA polymerases replicates organelle genomes in a wide distribution of taxa encompassing plants and protozoans. Making error-prone mutator versions of gamma DNA polymerases revolutionised our understanding of animal mitochondrial genomes but similar advances have not been made for the organelle DNA polymerases present in plant mitochondria and chloroplasts. We tested the fidelities of error prone tobacco organelle DNA polymerases using a novel positive selection method involving replication of the phage lambda cI repressor gene. Unlike gamma DNA polymerases, ablation of 3′–5′ exonuclease function resulted in a modest 5–8-fold error rate increase. Combining exonuclease deficiency with a polymerisation domain substitution raised the organelle DNA polymerase error rate by 140-fold relative to the wild type enzyme. This high error rate compares favourably with error-rates of mutator versions of animal gamma DNA polymerases. The error prone organelle DNA polymerase introduced mutations at multiple locations ranging from two to seven sites in half of the mutant cI genes studied. Single base substitutions predominated including frequent A:A (template: dNMP) mispairings. High error rate and semi-dominance to the wild type enzyme in vitro make the error prone organelle DNA polymerase suitable for elevating mutation rates in chloroplasts and mitochondria.     

DNA substrate structural requirements for the exonuclease and polymerase activities of procaryotic and phage DNA polymerases

A DNA duplex covalently cross-linked between specific bases has been prepared. This and similar duplexes are substrates for the polymerase and exonuclease activities of the Klenow fragment of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase I and T4 and T7 DNA polymerases. The action of Klenow fragment on these duplexes indicates that the polymerase site does not require that the DNA duplex undergo strand separation for activity, whereas the exonuclease site requires that at least four base pairs of the primer strand must melt out for the exonucleolytic removal of nucleotides from the primer terminus. The exonucleolytic action of T4 and T7 DNA polymerases requires that only two and three bases respectively melt out for excision of nucleotides from the primer terminus. Klenow fragment and T4 DNA polymerase are able to polymerize onto duplexes incapable of strand separation, whereas T7 DNA polymerase seems to require that the primer terminus be at least three bases from the cross-linked base pair. A DNA duplex with a biotin covalently linked to a specific base has been prepared. In the presence of the biotin binding protein avidin, the exonucleolytic activity of Klenow fragment requires that the primer terminus be at least 15 base pairs downstream from the base with the biotin-avidin complex. On the other hand, the polymerase activity of Klenow fragment required that the primer terminus be at least six base pairs downstream from the base with the biotin-avidin complex. These results suggest that the polymerase and exonuclease sites of Klenow are physically separate in solution and exhibit different substrate structural requirements for activity.     

Accessory proteins assist exonuclease-deficient bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase in replicating past an abasic site

Replicative DNA polymerases, such as T4 polymerase, possess both elongation and 3'-5' exonuclease proofreading catalytic activities. They arrest at the base preceding DNA damage on the coding DNA strand and specialized DNA polymerases have evolved to replicate across the lesion by a process known as TLS (translesion DNA synthesis). TLS is considered to take place in two steps that often require different enzymes, insertion of a nucleotide opposite the damaged template base followed by extension from the inserted nucleotide. We and others have observed that inactivation of the 3'-5' exonuclease function of T4 polymerase enables TLS across a single site-specific abasic [AP (apurinic/apyrimidinic)] lesion. In the present study we report a role for auxiliary replicative factors in this reaction. When replication is performed with a large excess of DNA template over DNA polymerase in the absence of auxiliary factors, the exo- polymerase (T4 DNA polymerase deficient in the 3'-5' exonuclease activity) inserts one nucleotide opposite the AP site but does not extend past the lesion. Addition of the clamp processivity factor and the clamp loader complex restores primer extension across an AP lesion on a circular AP-containing DNA substrate by the exo- polymerase, but has no effect on the wild-type enzyme. Hence T4 DNA polymerase exhibits a variety of responses to DNA damage. It can behave as a replicative polymerase or (in the absence of proofreading activity) as a specialized DNA polymerase and carry out TLS. As a specialized polymerase it can function either as an inserter or (with the help of accessory proteins) as an extender. The capacity to separate these distinct functions in a single DNA polymerase provides insight into the biochemical requirements for translesion DNA synthesis.     

The base substitution fidelity of DNA polymerase beta-dependent single nucleotide base excision repair

Damaged DNA bases are removed from mammalian genomes by base excision repair (BER). Single nucleotide BER requires several enzymatic activities, including DNA polymerase and 5',2'-deoxyribose-5-phosphate lyase. Both activities are intrinsic to four human DNA polymerases whose base substitution error rate during gap-filling DNA synthesis varies by more than 10,000-fold. This suggests that BER fidelity could vary over a wide range in an enzyme dependent manner. To investigate this possibility, here we describe an assay to measure the fidelity of BER reactions reconstituted with purified enzymes. When human uracil DNA glycosylase, AP endonuclease, DNA polymerase beta, and DNA ligase 1 replace uracil opposite template A or G, base substitution error rates are 相似文献   

Mutant Thermotoga neapolitana DNA polymerase I: altered catalytic properties for non-templated nucleotide addition and incorporation of correct nucleotides

Thermotoga neapolitana (Tne) DNA polymerase belongs to the DNA polymerase I (Pol I) family. The O-helix region of these polymerases is involved in dNTP binding and also plays a role in binding primer–template during DNA synthesis. Here we report that mutations in the O-helix region of Tne DNA polymerase (Arg722 to His, Tyr or Lys) almost completely abolished the enzyme’s ability to catalyze the template-independent addition of a single base at the 3′-end of newly synthesized DNA in vitro. The mutations did not significantly affect the DNA polymerase catalytic activity and reduced base misinsertions 5- to 50-fold. The same Arg722 mutations dramatically increased the ability of the enzyme’s 3′→5′ exonuclease to remove mispaired 3′ bases in a primer extension assay. These mutant DNA polymerases can be used to accurately amplify target DNA in vitro for gene cloning and genotyping analysis.     

Exonucleolytic proofreading by a mammalian DNA polymerase

Porcine liver DNA polymerase gamma contains exonuclease activity capable of digesting DNA in the 3'----5' direction, releasing deoxyribonucleoside 5'-monophosphates. The exonuclease activity excises 3'-terminal bases from both matched and mismatched primer termini, with a preference for mismatched bases. Under polymerization conditions, mismatch excision by the exonuclease occurs prior to polymerization by polymerase gamma, and this excision can be inhibited by adding to the reaction a high concentration of dNTP substrates and/or nucleoside 5'-monophosphates. In an M13mp2-based reversion assay for detecting single-base substitution errors, porcine liver polymerase gamma is highly accurate; the estimated base substitution error rate is less than one error for each 500,000 bases polymerized. Lower fidelity is observed using reaction conditions that inhibit the exonuclease activity, strongly suggesting that the exonuclease proofreads errors during polymerization. However, in a forward mutation assay capable of detecting all 12 mispairs at a variety of template positions, certain base substitution errors are readily detected even using unperturbed polymerization conditions. Thus, for some errors, polymerase gamma is not highly accurate, suggesting that proofreading is not equally active against all mispairs. To examine if the polymerase and exonuclease activities are physically as well as functionally associated, both activities were monitored during purification by four procedures, each based on a different separation principle. The two activities copurify during chromatography using phosphocellulose, heparin-agarose, or double-strand DNA-cellulose, and during velocity sedimentation in a glycerol gradient containing 0.5 M KCl. These results suggest that the polymerase and exonuclease activities are physically associated. It remains to be determined if they reside in the same subunit.     

The 3' --> 5' exonuclease of T4 DNA polymerase removes premutagenic alkyl mispairs and contributes to futile cycling at O6-methylguanine lesions

We have studied the processing of O(6)-methylguanine (m6G)-containing oligonucleotides and N-methyl-N-nitrosourea (MNU)-treated DNA templates by the 3' --> 5' exonuclease of T4 DNA polymerase. In vitro biochemical analyses demonstrate that the exonuclease can remove bases opposite a defined m6G lesion. The efficiency of excision of a terminal m6G.T was similar to that of m6G.C, and both were excised as efficiently as a G.T substrate. Partitioning assays between the polymerase and exonuclease activities, performed in the presence of dNTPs, resulted in repeated incorporation and excision events opposite the m6G lesion. This idling produces dramatically less full-length product, relative to natural substrates, indicating that the 3' --> 5' exonuclease may contribute to DNA synthesis inhibition by alkylating agents. Genetic data obtained using an in vitro herpes simplex virus-thymidine kinase assay support the inefficiency of the exonuclease as a "proofreading" activity for m6G, since virtually all mutations produced by the native enzyme using MNU-treated templates were G --> A transitions. Comparison of MNU dose-response curves for exonuclease-proficient and -deficient forms of T4 polymerase reveals that the exonuclease efficiently removes 50-86% of total premutagenic alkyl mispairs. We propose that idling of exonuclease-proficient polymerases at m6G lesions during repair DNA synthesis provides the biochemical explanation for cellular cytotoxicity of methylating agents.     

Characterization of Family D DNA polymerase from Thermococcus sp. 9°N

Accurate DNA replication is essential for maintenance of every genome. All archaeal genomes except Crenarchaea, encode for a member of Family B (polB) and Family D (polD) DNA polymerases. Gene deletion studies in Thermococcus kodakaraensis and Methanococcus maripaludis show that polD is the only essential DNA polymerase in these organisms. Thus, polD may be the primary replicative DNA polymerase for both leading and lagging strand synthesis. To understand this unique archaeal enzyme, we report the biochemical characterization of a heterodimeric polD from Thermococcus. PolD contains both DNA polymerase and proofreading 3′–5′ exonuclease activities to ensure efficient and accurate genome duplication. The polD incorporation fidelity was determined for the first time. Despite containing 3′–5′ exonuclease proofreading activity, polD has a relatively high error rate (95 × 10^?5) compared to polB (19 × 10^?5) and at least 10-fold higher than the polB DNA polymerases from yeast (polε and polδ) or Escherichia coli DNA polIII holoenzyme. The implications of polD fidelity and biochemical properties in leading and lagging strand synthesis are discussed.     

Mechanistic insights into the enzymatic activity and inhibition of the replicative polymerase exonuclease domain from Mycobacterium tuberculosis

DNA replication fidelity maintains low mutation rates in bacteria. The ε-subunit of a replisome generally acts as the main proofreader during replication, using its 3′–5′ exonuclease activity to excise misincorporated bases thereby maintaining faithful replication. In Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb), however, the polymerase and histidinol phosphatase (PHP) domain of the DNA polymerase DnaE1 is the primary proofreader. This domain thus maintains low mutation rates during replication and is an attractive target for drug development. Even though the structures of DnaE polymerases are available from various organisms, including Mtb, the mechanism of exonuclease activity remains elusive. In this study, we sought to unravel the mechanism and also to identify scaffolds that can specifically inhibit the exonuclease activity. To gain insight into the mode of action, we also characterized the PHP domain of the Mtb error-prone polymerase DnaE2 which shares a nearly identical active site with DnaE1-PHP. Kinetic and mutational studies allowed us to identify the critical residue involved in catalysis. Combined inhibition and computational studies also revealed a specific mode of inhibition of DnaE1-PHP by nucleoside diphosphates. Thus, this study lays the foundation for the rational design of novel inhibitors which target the Mtb replicative proofreader.     

DNA polymerase epsilon: the latest member in the family of mammalian DNA polymerases

DNA polymerase epsilon is a mammalian polymerase that has a tightly associated 3'----5' exonuclease activity. Because of this readily detectable exonuclease activity, the enzyme has been regarded as a form of DNA polymerase delta, an enzyme which, together with DNA polymerase alpha, is in all probability required for the replication of chromosomal DNA. Recently, it was discovered that DNA polymerase epsilon is both catalytically and structurally distinct from DNA polymerase delta. The most striking difference between the two DNA polymerases is that processive DNA synthesis by DNA polymerase delta is dependent on proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a replication factor, while DNA polymerase epsilon is inherently processive. DNA polymerase epsilon is required at least for the repair synthesis of UV-damaged DNA. DNA polymerases are highly conserved in eukaryotic cells. Mammalian DNA polymerases alpha, delta and epsilon are counterparts of yeast DNA polymerases I, III and II, respectively. Like DNA polymerases I and III, DNA polymerase II is also essential for the viability of cells, which suggests that DNA polymerase II (and epsilon) may play a role in DNA replication.     

Switching between polymerase and exonuclease sites in DNA polymerase ε

The balance between exonuclease and polymerase activities promotes DNA synthesis over degradation when nucleotides are correctly added to the new strand by replicative B-family polymerases. Misincorporations shift the balance toward the exonuclease site, and the balance tips back in favor of DNA synthesis when the incorrect nucleotides have been removed. Most B-family DNA polymerases have an extended β-hairpin loop that appears to be important for switching from the exonuclease site to the polymerase site, a process that affects fidelity of the DNA polymerase. Here, we show that DNA polymerase ε can switch between the polymerase site and exonuclease site in a processive manner despite the absence of an extended β-hairpin loop. K967 and R988 are two conserved amino acids in the palm and thumb domain that interact with bases on the primer strand in the minor groove at positions n−2 and n−4/n−5, respectively. DNA polymerase ε depends on both K967 and R988 to stabilize the 3′-terminus of the DNA within the polymerase site and on R988 to processively switch between the exonuclease and polymerase sites. Based on a structural alignment with DNA polymerase δ, we propose that arginines corresponding to R988 might have a similar function in other B-family polymerases.     

Exonucleolytic proofreading enhances the fidelity of DNA synthesis by chick embryo DNA polymerase-gamma

The high fidelity of chick embryo DNA polymerase-gamma (pol-gamma) observed during in vitro DNA synthesis (Kunkel, T. A. (1985) J. Biol. Chem. 260, 12866-12874) has led us to examine this DNA polymerase for the presence of an exonuclease activity capable of proofreading errors. Highly purified chick embryo pol-gamma preparations do contain exonuclease activity capable of digesting radiolabeled DNA in a 3'----5' direction, releasing deoxynucleoside 5'-monophosphates. The polymerase and exonuclease activities cosediment during centrifugation in a glycerol gradient containing 0.5 M KCl. In the absence of dNTP substrates, this exonuclease excises both matched and mismatched primer termini, with a preference for mismatched bases. Excision is inhibited by the addition of nucleoside 5'-monophosphates to the digestion reaction. In the presence of dNTP substrates to permit competition between excision and polymerization from the mismatched primer, the exonuclease excises mismatched bases from preformed terminal mispairs with greater than 98% efficiency. The preference for excision over polymerization can be diminished by addition of either high concentrations of dNTP substrates or nucleoside 5'-monophosphates to the exonuclease/polymerase reaction. To determine if this exonuclease is capable of proofreading misinsertions produced during a normal polymerization reaction, a sensitive base substitution fidelity assay was developed based on reversion of an M13mp2 lacZ alpha nonsense codon. In this assay using reaction conditions that permit highly active exonucleolytic proofreading, pol-gamma exhibits a fidelity of less than one error for every 260,000 bases polymerized. As for terminal mismatch excision, fidelity is reduced by the addition to the synthesis reaction of high concentrations of dNTP substrates or nucleoside 5'-monophosphates, both hallmarks of exonucleolytic proofreading by prokaryotic enzymes. Taken together, these observations suggest that the 3'----5' exonuclease present in highly purified chick embryo pol-gamma preparations proofreads base substitution errors during DNA synthesis. It remains to be determined if the polymerase and exonuclease activities reside in the same or different polypeptides.     

Interaction of DNA polymerase I (Klenow fragment) with DNA substrates containing extrahelical bases: implications for proofreading of frameshift errors during DNA synthesis

Frameshift mutagenesis occurs through the misalignment of primer and template strands during DNA synthesis and involves DNA intermediates that contain one or more extrahelical bases in either strand of the DNA substrate. To investigate whether these DNA structures are recognized by the proofreading apparatus of DNA polymerases, time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy was used to examine the interaction between the Klenow fragment of DNA polymerase I and synthetic DNA primer-templates containing extrahelical bases at defined positions within the template strand. A dansyl probe attached to the DNA was used to measure the fractional occupancies of the polymerase and 3'-5' exonuclease sites of the enzyme for DNA substrates with and without the extrahelical bases. The presence of an extrahelical base at the first position from the primer 3' terminus increased the level of partitioning of the DNA substrates into the 3'-5' exonuclease site by 3-7-fold, relative to the perfectly base-paired primer-template, depending on the identity of the extrahelical base. The ability of different extrahelical bases to promote partitioning of DNA into the 3'-5' exonuclease site decreased in the following order: G > A approximately T > C. The results of partitioning measurements for DNA substrates containing a bulged adenine base at different positions within the template showed that an extrahelical base is recognized up to five bases from the primer 3' terminus. The largest effects were observed for the extrahelical base at the third or fourth positions from the primer terminus, which increased the level of partitioning of DNA into the 3'-5' exonuclease site by 8- and 18-fold, respectively, relative to that of the perfectly base-paired substrate. Steady-state fluorescence measurements of analogous primer-templates containing 2-aminopurine (AP) at the primer 3' terminus indicate that extrahelical bases increase the degree of terminus unwinding, especially when close to the terminus. In addition, steady-state kinetic measurements of removal of AP from the primer-templates indicate that the exonucleolytic cleavage activity of Klenow fragment is correlated with the increased level of partitioning of bulged DNA substrates to the 3'-5' exonuclease site relative to that of properly base-paired DNA. The results of this study indicate that misalignment of primer and template strands to generate an extrahelical base strongly promotes transfer of a DNA substrate to the 3'-5' exonuclease site, suggesting that the premutational intermediates in frameshift mutagenesis are subject to proofreading by the polymerase.