SARS‐CoV‐2 sensing by RIG‐I and MDA5 links epithelial infection to macrophage inflammation

SARS‐CoV‐2 infection causes broad‐spectrum immunopathological disease, exacerbated by inflammatory co‐morbidities. A better understanding of mechanisms underpinning virus‐associated inflammation is required to develop effective therapeutics. Here, we discover that SARS‐CoV‐2 replicates rapidly in lung epithelial cells despite triggering a robust innate immune response through the activation of cytoplasmic RNA sensors RIG‐I and MDA5. The inflammatory mediators produced during epithelial cell infection can stimulate primary human macrophages to enhance cytokine production and drive cellular activation. Critically, this can be limited by abrogating RNA sensing or by inhibiting downstream signalling pathways. SARS‐CoV‐2 further exacerbates the local inflammatory environment when macrophages or epithelial cells are primed with exogenous inflammatory stimuli. We propose that RNA sensing of SARS‐CoV‐2 in lung epithelium is a key driver of inflammation, the extent of which is influenced by the inflammatory state of the local environment, and that specific inhibition of innate immune pathways may beneficially mitigate inflammation‐associated COVID‐19.     

TATA and paused promoters active in differentiated tissues have distinct expression characteristics

Core promoter types differ in the extent to which RNA polymerase II (Pol II) pauses after initiation, but how this affects their tissue‐specific gene expression characteristics is not well understood. While promoters with Pol II pausing elements are active throughout development, TATA promoters are highly active in differentiated tissues. We therefore used a genomics approach on late‐stage Drosophila embryos to analyze the properties of promoter types. Using tissue‐specific Pol II ChIP‐seq, we found that paused promoters have high levels of paused Pol II throughout the embryo, even in tissues where the gene is not expressed, while TATA promoters only show Pol II occupancy when the gene is active. The promoter types are associated with different chromatin accessibility in ATAC‐seq data and have different expression characteristics in single‐cell RNA‐seq data. The two promoter types may therefore be optimized for different properties: paused promoters show more consistent expression when active, while TATA promoters have lower background expression when inactive. We propose that tissue‐specific genes have evolved to use two different strategies for their differential expression across tissues.     

整合因子复合物——基因转录调控的多能选手

整合因子复合物(integrator complex,INT)的发现极大地拓展了对小核RNA转录成熟和基因转录调控的认知,也重新掀起了相关领域的研究热潮.INT是1个至少由14个亚基组成、分子量超过1.4 MD的蛋白质复合物.它一方面通过内切酶活性切割转录本,执行功能;另一方面与PP2A磷酸酶结合,调节RNA聚合酶Ⅱ上...     

The STI1‐domain is a flexible alpha‐helical fold with a hydrophobic groove

STI1‐domains are present in a variety of co‐chaperone proteins and are required for the transfer of hydrophobic clients in various cellular processes. The domains were first identified in the yeast Sti1 protein where they were referred to as DP1 and DP2. Based on hidden Markov model searches, this domain had previously been found in other proteins including the mammalian co‐chaperone SGTA, the DNA damage response protein Rad23, and the chloroplast import protein Tic40. Here, we refine the domain definition and carry out structure‐based sequence alignment of STI1‐domains showing conservation of five amphipathic helices. Upon examinations of these identified domains, we identify a preceding helix 0 and unifying sequence properties, determine new molecular models, and recognize that STI1‐domains nearly always occur in pairs. The similarity at the sequence, structure, and molecular levels likely supports a unified functional role.