不同人群人工流产术围手术期预防用多西环素临床分析

目的:分析不同人群人工流产术围手术期预防用多西环素的临床疗效。方法:采用回顾性调查方法,抽取本院2012年要求行人工流产术的日间手术住院患者4073例,分为正常人群和高危人群。正常人群中预防用多西环素者(预防组)2007例,未预防用抗菌药物组(未预防组)688例,高危人群中预防组865例,未预防组513例。对比分析不同人群预防组和未预防组术后1个月的手术部位感染率和远期(1年)并发症发生率。结果:正常人群预防组的手术部位感染率及远期并发症发生率分别为2.14%、7.77%,均分别显著低于未预防组的6.54%、11.05%(P0.05),而高危人群预防组分别为4.62%、10.06%,与未预防组的4.68%、12.09%比较,差异均无统计学意义(P0.05)。结论:围手术期预防用多西环素可降低人工流产术中正常人群的手术部位感染率和远期并发症发生率,而对于高危人群的作用不明显,因此术前应对患者的高危感染因素进行积极治愈或纠正后,预防用药价值可能较大。     

Evidence-based practices for thromboembolism prevention: summary of the ASPS Venous Thromboembolism Task Force Report

In July of 2011, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons Executive Committee approved the Venous Thromboembolism Task Force Report. The report includes a summary of the scientific literature relevant to venous thromboembolism and plastic surgery along with five evidence-based recommendations. The recommendations are divided into two sections: risk stratification and prevention. The risk stratification recommendations are based on the 2005 Caprini Risk Assessment Module, which has been validated in the scientific literature as an effective tool for risk-stratifying plastic and reconstructive surgery patients based on individual risk factors for 60-day venous thromboembolism. The three prophylaxis recommendations are dependent on an individual patient's 2005 Caprini Risk Assessment Module score.     

围术期体温监测及保温的现状分析

体温是人体重要的生命体征,其过低或过高都会对患者的预后造成不利影响,在临床中最常见也最容易被忽视的是围术期低体温。围术期长时间的体温过低会引起麻醉苏醒延迟、心律失常、影响切口愈合等多种并发症,增加死亡率,延迟出院时间。体温监测及相应的保温措施对于防治低体温至关重要,围术期及时有效地体温监测能反映病人术中病情的变化,但目前临床中对于体温的监控却普遍重视不足。本文对近年来临床常用的体温监测方法及保温手段做一综述。     

The Danish Registry for Plastic Surgery of the Breast: establishment of a nationwide registry for prospective follow-up,quality assessment,and investigation of breast surgery

Although numerous epidemiologic studies have examined the long-term safety of silicone breast implants during the past decade, there is a relative lack of surveillance data on short-term health effects and complications following cosmetic surgery of the breast. The Danish Registry for Plastic Surgery of the Breast, established in May of 1999, provides plastic surgeons with a nationwide system for the collection of preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative data on women undergoing breast implantation, breast reduction, or mastopexy. The purpose of the Registry is to examine short-term and, eventually, long-term local complications and possible health effects, and to contribute to an ongoing evaluation of surgical results and surveillance of the products. Furthermore, the Registry will allow the identification of new areas for research into cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery. Women accepting registration in the Danish Registry for Plastic Surgery of the Breast complete a self-administered questionnaire focusing on medical history and demographic and behavioral factors. Preoperative blood samples are drawn for storage. Surgical data, postoperative results, and complications are registered following surgery and at postoperative visits. Currently, registration has been initiated at 24 private and public clinics, representing more than 80 percent of the plastic surgery clinics in Denmark. As of November of 2001, a total of 1472 women with breast implants and 560 women with breast reduction were included in the Registry. These figures are expected to increase annually by 1000 women undergoing breast implantation and 500 women undergoing breast reduction or mastopexy. The authors present their experience of establishing the first nationwide comprehensive clinical-epidemiologic database and biological bank for cosmetic and reconstructive surgery procedures.     

The prevention of emesis in plastic surgery: a randomized,prospective study

Perhaps the most unpleasant experience following outpatient plastic surgery procedures is postoperative nausea and vomiting. Postoperative nausea and vomiting often results in delayed recovery time and unintended admission, and it can be a contributing factor to the formation of hematoma following rhytidectomy. Ondansetron (Zofran) has proven benefit in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting if given before general anesthesia in a variety of surgical procedures. Its utility in cases performed under conscious sedation has not been determined. The purpose of this study was (1) to test the ability of prophylactic ondansetron to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting in plastic surgery cases performed under conscious sedation, and (2) to determine relative risk factors for postoperative nausea and vomiting and a selection policy for the administration of antiemetic prophylaxis. This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind study. One hundred twenty patients were enrolled after giving informed consent. Patients received a single dose of either placebo or ondansetron (4 mg intravenously) before administration of sedation. Sedation administration followed a standardized institutional protocol, using midazolam and fentanyl. Data were recorded from a series of three questionnaires: preoperatively, immediately postoperatively, and at the time of the first office return. Data were confirmed by means of telephone interview, chart analysis, and nursing documentation. Multivariate analysis was conducted. Nausea and emesis occurred with an overall frequency of 33 percent and 22 percent, respectively. Postoperative nausea and vomiting was associated with statistically longer recovery periods. The incidence of emesis was statistically higher among women, among those undergoing facial rejuvenation, and among those with a history of opioid-induced emesis or postoperative nausea and vomiting following a previous operation (p < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting paralleled increases in case duration; the incidence of emesis was zero in cases less than 90 minutes in duration. Ondansetron significantly reduced the incidence of emesis overall (placebo, 30 percent; ondansetron, 13 percent; p < 0.05). Postoperative perception of nausea was significantly lower among those who had received ondansetron (p < 0.05). These results confirm the efficacy of ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in plastic surgery cases under conscious sedation. In those who are at increased risk, prophylaxis should be considered. Such risks include female gender, facial rejuvenation procedures, and a patient history of opioid-induced emesis or postoperative nausea and vomiting following a prior operation. The zero incidence of emesis in cases less than 90 minutes does not support the routine use of prophylaxis in such cases. Patient satisfaction in plastic surgery is derived from the overall subjective experience of the event as much as by the final result. By remaining attentive to patient concerns and optimizing perioperative care, we can improve the subjective experience for our patients.     

Criteria for Patient Selection and Multidisciplinary Evaluation and Treatment of the Weight Loss Surgery Patient

Objective: To provide evidence‐based guidelines for patient selection and to recommend the medical and nutritional aspects of multidisciplinary care required to minimize perioperative and postoperative risks in patients with severe obesity who undergo weight loss surgery (WLS). Research Methods and Procedures: Members of the Multidisciplinary Care Task Group conducted searches of MEDLINE and PubMed for articles related to WLS in general and medical and nutritional care in particular. Pertinent abstracts and literature were reviewed for references. Multiple searches were carried out for various aspects of multidisciplinary care published between 1980 and 2004. A total of 3000 abstracts were identified; 242 were reviewed in detail. Results: We recommended multidisciplinary screening of WLS patients to ensure appropriate selection; preoperative assessment for cardiovascular, pulmonary, gastrointestinal, endocrine, and other obesity‐related diseases associated with increased risk for complications or mortality; preoperative weight loss and cessation of smoking; perioperative prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism (PE); preoperative and postoperative education and counseling by a registered dietitian; and a well‐defined postsurgical diet progression. Discussion: Obesity‐related diseases are often undiagnosed before WLS, putting patients at increased risk for complications and/or early mortality. Multidisciplinary assessment and care to minimize short‐ and long‐term risks include: comprehensive medical screening; appropriate pre‐, peri‐, and postoperative preparation; collaboration with multiple patient care disciplines (e.g., anesthesiology, pulmonary medicine, cardiology, and psychology); and long‐term nutrition education/counseling.     

Breast reduction

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Understand the preoperative considerations that must be weighed to appropriately assess operative risk of breast reduction. 2. Have a full understanding of the basic techniques that are available to treat the patient with macromastia. 3. Identify which patients are best suited to a particular technique. 4. Identify common complications associated with breast reduction and understand how to treat them. SUMMARY: Breast reduction remains a basic plastic surgery procedure designed to alleviate upper torso complaints resulting from macromastia. Historically, the inverted-T inferior pedicle procedure was the dominant technique for the treatment of macromastia for 40 years. The past two decades have seen a reexamination of breast reduction technique in an attempt to improve on the results and minimize complications. As a result, a new genre of procedures based on different pedicles and short-scar skin management techniques has been introduced. With these new procedures, the plastic surgeon now has a variety of different techniques that can be offered for reducing the hypertrophic breast. Strategically applying the concepts inherent in these procedures to the correct patient can provide outstanding results with few complications. In this article, the concepts and results of these various procedures are discussed to give the reader a basic understanding of the options available for breast reduction.     

Safety and efficacy in an accredited outpatient plastic surgery facility: a review of 5316 consecutive cases

Advances in medicine have improved the delivery of health care, making it more technologically superior than ever and, at the same time, more complex. Nowhere is this more evident than in the surgical arena. Plastic surgeons are able to perform procedures safely in office-based facilities that were once reserved only for hospital operating rooms or ambulatory surgery centers. Performing procedures in the office is a convenience to both the surgeon and the patient. Some groups have challenged that performing plastic surgery procedures in an office-based facility compromises patient safety. Our study was done to determine whether outcomes are adversely affected by performing plastic surgery procedures in an accredited outpatient surgical center. A retrospective review was performed on 5316 consecutive cases completed between 1995 and 2000 at Dallas Day Surgical Center, Dallas, Texas, an outpatient surgical facility. Most cases were cosmetic procedures. All cases were analyzed for any potential morbidity or mortality. Complications requiring a return to the operating room were determined, as were infection rates. Events leading to inpatient hospitalization were also included. During this 6-year period, 35 complications (0.7 percent) and no deaths were reported. Most complications were secondary to hematoma formation (77 percent). The postoperative infection rate for patients requiring a return to the operating room was 0.11 percent. Seven patients required inpatient hospitalization following their procedure secondary to arrhythmias, angina, and pulmonary emboli. Patient safety must take precedence over cost and convenience. Any monetary savings or time gained is quickly lost if safety is compromised and complications are incurred. The safety profile of the outpatient facility must meet and even exceed that of the traditional hospital-based or ambulatory care facility. After reviewing our experience over the last 6 years that indicated few complications and no deaths, we continue to support the judicious use of accredited outpatient surgical facilities by board-certified plastic surgeons in the management of plastic surgery patients.     

A review of occupational health and safety risk assessment approaches based on multi-criteria decision-making methods and their fuzzy versions

Occupational health and safety (OHS) is a multidisciplinary activity working under the tasks of protection of workers and worksites. Risk assessment, as a compulsory process in implementation of OHS, stands out as evaluating the risks arising from the hazards, taking into account the required control measures, and deciding whether or not the risks can be reduced to an acceptable level. The diversity in risk assessment approaches is such that there are many methods for any industry. Multicriteria decision-making (MCDM)-based approaches contribute to risk assessment knowledge with their ability on solving real-world problems with multiple, conflicting, and incommensurate criteria. This article conducts a critical state-of-the-art review of OHS risk assessment studies using MCDM-based approaches. Additionally, it includes fuzzy versions of MCDM approaches applied to OHS risk assessment. A total of 80 papers are classified in eight different application areas. The papers are reviewed by the points of publication trend, published journal, risk parameters/factors, and tools used. This critical review provides an insight for researchers and practitioners on MCDM-based OHS risk assessment approaches in terms of showing current state and potential areas for attempts to be focused in the future.     

医疗美容医疗纠纷成因分析及对策探讨

医疗美容科是外科手术较为频繁、患者对手术期望极高的科室。患者所要求的不仅仅是安全,而且对术后效果更为重视,整形美容科术后效果不佳是整形美容科医疗纠纷高发的重要原因之一。通过对整形美容医疗纠纷成因进行分析,消除医疗事故隐患,规避医疗风险。     

Complications in postbariatric body contouring: strategies for assessment and prevention

Massive weight loss patients present specific challenges to the plastic surgeon. Review of these issues may be valuable for the surgeon who does not specialize in this area. Obtaining excellent results involves a comprehensive perioperative approach, beginning with proper patient selection and appropriate expectations. Operative considerations such as hypothermia prevention and thromboembolic prophylaxis can play a role in improving outcomes and reducing morbidity. Appropriately focused postoperative care completes the surgical plan, leading to satisfying results for both patient and surgeon.     

Face lift

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Identify and describe the anatomy of and changes to the aging face, including changes in bone mass and structure and changes to the skin, tissue, and muscles. 2. Assess each individual's unique anatomy before embarking on face-lift surgery and incorporate various surgical techniques, including fat grafting and other corrective procedures in addition to shifting existing fat to a higher position on the face, into discussions with patients. 3. Identify risk factors and potential complications in prospective patients. 4. Describe the benefits and risks of various techniques. SUMMARY: The ability to surgically rejuvenate the aging face has progressed in parallel with plastic surgeons' understanding of facial anatomy. In turn, a more clear explanation now exists for the visible changes seen in the aging face. This article and its associated video content review the current understanding of facial anatomy as it relates to facial aging. The standard face-lift techniques are explained and their various features, both good and bad, are reviewed. The objective is for surgeons to make a better aesthetic diagnosis before embarking on face-lift surgery, and to have the ability to use the appropriate technique depending on the clinical situation.     

Best Practice Recommendations for Anesthetic Perioperative Care and Pain Management in Weight Loss Surgery

Objective: To develop evidence‐based recommendations that optimize the safety and efficacy of perioperative anesthetic care and pain management in weight loss surgery (WLS) patients. Research Methods and Procedures: This Task Group examined the scientific literature on anesthetic perioperative care and pain management published in MEDLINE from January 1994 to March 2004. We also reviewed additional data from other sources (e.g., book chapters). The search yielded 195 abstracts, of which 35 references were reviewed in detail. Task Group consensus was used to provide recommendations when evidence in the literature was insufficient. Results: We developed anesthesia practice and patient safety advisory recommendations for preoperative evaluation, intraoperative management, and postoperative care and pain management of WLS patients. We also provided suggestions related to medical error reduction and systems improvements, credentialing, and future research. Discussion: Obesity‐related comorbidities including obstructive sleep apnea place WLS patients at increased risk for complications perioperatively. Regarding perioperative safety and outcomes, conclusive evidence beyond the accepted standard of care in the reviewed literature is limited. Few reports specifically address the perioperative needs of severely obese patients. In this advisory, we synthesize current knowledge and make best practice recommendations for perioperative care and pain management in WLS patients. These recommendations require periodic review as further medical knowledge and evidence evolve.     

Pre-operative respiratory evaluation and management of patients for upper abdominal surgery.

Patients presenting for surgery, be it on an elective or emergency basis, do so in the hope that the anesthetic will be without risk. Yet complications which arise are not always due to anesthesia. More often, the surgical process and factors intrinsic to the patient are major determinants of outcome. Pre-operative assessment allows review of the patient and the proposed surgery, and formation of a plan of management for the pre-, intra-, and post-operative anesthetic care. This paper provides an overview of the pre-operative assessment and management of patients who are to undergo upper abdominal surgery, with the aim of minimizing their risk of post-operative pulmonary complications. In particular, factors which contribute to the development of post-operative respiratory problems are described.     

Factors affecting nausea and vomiting in the plastic surgery patient

In plastic and reconstructive surgery, nausea and vomiting are annoying and often dangerous phenomena, yet attempts to suppress them therapeutically may cause physiological actions of an undesirable nature. Nevertheless, it is possible, through clinical observation and the taking of a careful history, to identify many patients who are at highest risk of suffering undue damage from emetic episodes. Skillful selection of surgical and anesthetic measures that safely limit provocation of the vomiting reflex and the careful use of effective antiemetic drugs in patients particularly at risk can effectively reduce the incidence of what may be our patient's most unpleasant and dangerous perioperative experience.     

复杂性眼外伤患者玻璃体切割围手术期护理体会

目的:玻璃体切割术是眼科手术中比较复杂精细显手术,主要应用于治疗眼外伤导致的玻璃体出血,玻璃体浑浊,复杂性视网膜脱离以及增殖性玻璃体视网膜病变。本文主要探讨玻璃体切割术治疗复杂性眼外伤患者的围手术期护理的临床效应。方法:总结作者所在科室多年来护理眼外伤患者的临床经验,对2013年3月至2013年7月入院的75例(75只眼)复杂性眼外伤患者进行悉心的术前心理护理,完善的用药指导,充分的术前准备,术后特殊卧位的指导,预防并发症的护理及出院指导。结果:术后视力提高57例(76.0%),视力不变13(17.3%)例,视力下降5例(6.7%),28例眼内异物患者均经手术顺利取出异物。相关手术并发症经医护人员的对症治疗后均得到有效控制。患者术后满意度达98%以上,医生满意度达100%。结论:复杂性眼外伤患者玻璃体切割手术围手术期进行全方位的护理服务,对促进病人康复起到至关重要的作用。     

General anesthesia in an office-based plastic surgical facility: a report on more than 23,000 consecutive office-based procedures under general anesthesia with no significant anesthetic complications

The popularity of elective office-based plastic surgery has increased significantly over the past two decades. The continuing demand for improved aesthetic results has stimulated the development of ever more complex plastic surgical techniques. These techniques may require extended periods of operative time spent under anesthesia. Patients have come to expect an almost perfect anesthetic and surgical experience, with safety and comfort being their foremost concerns. Because of increasingly complex and lengthy operations, the authors believe that intravenous sedation, used for many years in their plastic surgery practice, is now suboptimal for most longer and complex surgical procedures. In their experience, under most circumstances, general anesthesia provides the optimal anesthetic experience for the patient, anesthesiologist, and surgeon. The authors present a consecutive 18-year study of general anesthesia in more than 23,000 procedures in an accredited, office-based plastic surgical facility that offers a very safe and uniformly pleasant anesthesia experience for patients. There were no intraoperative or postoperative deaths and no significant complications. The authors' experience differs from the common perception that general anesthesia is too risky for aesthetic surgery procedures.     

Technical aspects and outcome after prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction in 30 consecutive high-risk patients

The purpose of this study was to evaluate a consecutive series of patients operated on with prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction with implants, focusing on preoperative assessment, technical aspects of surgical outcome, and number of postoperative complications on a short-term basis. Thirty consecutive healthy women with an increased risk of breast cancer who were therefore operated on with bilateral prophylactic mastectomy and immediate breast reconstruction are reported. A multidisciplinary approach with a geneticist, general surgeon, plastic surgeon, specially trained nurse, psychologist, gynecologist, and oncologist was used preoperatively, with thorough information provided to the patient about the surgery. Eleven patients had gene mutations, and in all patients, the geneticist had performed a risk assessment. The mean age of the patients was 41 years. The technique was modified over time with smaller or special incisions and tailor-made adjustments for each patient. Great care was taken to remove all breast tissue. The tops of the breast nipples were regrafted for cosmetic purposes, and the base was sent for histopathologic examination. In most cases, permanent expander prostheses with detachable valves were used. The areolas were tattooed, if they were not left in place. No patient had occult cancer or carcinoma in situ. Four postoperative complications occurred, including two hematomas, one infection (treated with antibiotics), and one pneumothorax in a patient with severe asthma. All reconstructions were fulfilled. The mean hospital stay was 5.7 days. The time from mastectomy to the final tattooing of the areolas was 260 days. All patients returned to normal daily activities after fulfilled reconstruction.     

胃癌患者术后并发症的危险因素分析

目的:探讨胃癌术后并发症的危险因素及其防治措施.方法:调查117例胃癌患者手术治疗前后的临床资料,并对术后发生并发症可能的危险因素进行评估、分析.结果:胃癌术后并发症包括切口感染、肺部感染或胸腔积液、腹腔感染、肠梗阻、吻合口瘘,发生率为35.04％(41/117),手术方式、手术时间、胃管留置时间、术后生活习惯与手术后并发症相关(P＜0.05).结论:胃癌术后并发症由多种原因综合引起,除患者素质和病变因素外,6个危险因素依次为:行全胃切除、D2清扫、手术时间＞4h、术中出血量≥800mL、胃管留置时间＞3d、长期吸烟,应重视其围手术期处理.