CMA membership survey: opinions on issues facing the medical profession

A sample survey of Canadian Medical Association (CMA) members, conducted in early summer 1985 and designed to provide information to help guide the association''s activities and policies, shows that most Canadian physicians support involvement in political activities both by CMA and by indivudual physicians. A majority wishes to maintain the concept of extra/balance billing, to pursue the position that the health care system is underfunded and favours medicare premiums and hospital user fees as the preferred methods for increasing revenue.Most respondents believe that the number of doctors in Canada is about right but would prefer any reduction to be achieved by cutting medical school admissions or reducing postgraduate training positions open to graduates of foreign medical schools.Most of those members who know of CMA policies on a number of health care issues agree with them and also find them useful, but a significant proportion are not aware of their content.There is support for compulsory payment of dues by all licensed physicians to both their provincial medical association and CMA. A majority would like more information on pharmaceutical products and additional membership surveys.     

Discrimination against gay,lesbian and bisexual family physicians by patients

BACKGROUND: Discrimination against gay, lesbian and bisexual (GLB) patients by physicians is well known. Discrimination against GLB physicians by their colleagues and superiors is also well known and includes harassment, denial of positions and refusal to refer patients to them. The purpose of this study was to identify and quantify the attitudes of patients toward GLB physicians. METHODS: Telephone interviews were conducted with 500 randomly selected people living in a large urban Canadian city. Subjects were asked if they would refuse to see a GLB family physician and, if so, to describe the reason why. They were then given a choice of 6 reasons obtained from consultation with 10 GLB people and 10 heterosexual people. RESULTS: Of the 500 subjects 346 (69.2%) were reached and agreed to participate. Of the 346 respondents 41 (11.8%) stated that they would refuse to see a GLB family physician. The 2 most common reasons for the discrimination (prevalence rate more than 50%) were that GLB physicians would be incompetent and the respondent would feel "uncomfortable" having a GLB physician. Although more male than female respondents discriminated against GLB physicians, the difference was not statistically significant. The proportion of male and female respondents who discriminated increased with age (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: The observed prevalence of patient discrimination against GLB family physicians is significant. The results suggest that the discrimination is based on emotional reasons and is not related to such factors as misinformation about STDs and fear of being thought of sexually. Therefore, educational efforts should be directed against general perceptions of homosexuality rather than targeting specific medical concerns.     

The role of deputizing agencies in the delivery of primary health care services.

When not available to their patients, family practitioners in large cities can "sign out" to deputizing agencies, which coordinate the activities of part-time physicians on call. The physicians making use of one such agency in Toronto appeared to be representative of family practitioners in the region. One thousand of their patients seen consecutively by one physician were asked a series of questions. The majority of the 811 evaluable patients were considered to have problems justifying an after-hours call, although 16% of the problems were of a trivial nature. However, almost half of the patients with trivial problems would have gone to the local emergency room, as would 85% of all the patients. Although virtually all (94%) of the visits with the elderly were justified, 34% of the patients in this age group said they probably or definitely would not have sought emergency room care if a physician had not been available. The use of deputizing agencies should reduce the overuse of emergency room facilities and provide optimal after-hours primary medical care.     

Emergency physicians and sexual involvement with patients: an Ontario survey

OBJECTIVE: To describe Ontario emergency physicians'' knowledge of colleagues'' sexual involvement with patients and former patients, their own personal experience of such involvement, and their attitudes toward postvisit relationships. DESIGN: Mailed survey. SETTING: Ontario. PARTICIPANTS: Emergency physicians practising in Ontario. RESULTS: Of 974 eligible mailed surveys, 599 (61.5%) were returned. Of these respondents, 52 (8.7%) reported being aware of a colleague in emergency practice who had been sexually involved with a patient or former patient. When describing their own behaviour, 37 respondents (6.2%) reported sexual involvement with a former patient. However, of this group, only 9 (25.0%) had met the patient in an emergency department. Thus, of the total number of respondents, only 1.5% (9/599) reported sexual involvement arising out of an emergency department visit. Most respondents (82.4%) agreed that it is inappropriate behaviour to ask a patient for a date after an emergency assessment and before the patient''s departure, and 66.4% felt that it is inappropriate to contact the patient after discharge. However, only 10.6% believed it to be unacceptable to request a social meeting after encountering a patient previously cared for in the emergency department in a nonprofessional setting. Most respondents (96.5%) did not believe that sexual involvement could ever be therapeutic for the patient. However, only 66% felt that it was always an abuse of power and 62.4% supported zero tolerance of all sexual involvement between physicians and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Vague regulatory guidelines currently in place have failed to dispel confusion regarding what is acceptable social behaviour for physicians providing emergency care. Our results support the need for clarification, and suggest a basis for guidelines that would be acceptable to the emergency medical community: that an emergency visit should not form the basis for the initiation of personal or sexual relationships, yet neither should it preclude their development in nonmedical settings.     

Is being a doctor still fun?

Over the past two decades, a decline in physician job and career satisfaction has been reported. This study was developed to determine the current state of physician satisfaction and to define factors correlated with overall satisfaction. We mailed a survey to 406 physicians in Solano County, California. Responses were anonymous, and data were analyzed by several methods. Of the 406 physicians, 251 (62%) responded. Most respondents were satisfied with their jobs (80%). The vast majority felt good about their ability to help their patients (92%), enjoyed the relationships they had with patients (93%) and colleagues (86%), and found their work intellectually satisfying (89%). Nearly two thirds (63%) of respondents thought their job was "fun." This ability to derive great pleasure from work showed the strongest correlation with overall satisfaction. Overall satisfaction did not differ between primary care and non-primary care physicians or between physicians in a large health maintenance organization and those in mostly solo and small-group fee-for-service practices. Despite substantial challenges to physician morale and autonomy, most responding physicians in our study continued to enjoy overall job satisfaction, and a solid majority thought that their work was fun.     

A cross-cultural study of physician treatment decisions in relation to demented nursing home patients who develop pneumonia

This qualitative interview study in The Netherlands and North Carolina (US) found that physician treatment decisions are influenced by contextual differences in physician training and healthcare delivery in the US and The Netherlands. Dutch physicians treating nursing home residents with dementia and pneumonia assumed active, primary responsibility for treatment decisions while US physicians were more passive and deferential to family preferences, even in cases where they considered the families' wishes inappropriate. Dutch physicians knew their patients well and made treatment decisions based on what they perceived was in the best interest of the patient while US physicians reported limited knowledge of their nursing home patients due to a lack of contact time. Efforts to improve care for patients with poor quality of life who lack decision-making capacity must consider the context of societal values, physician training, and the processes by which physicians negotiate patient and family preferences.     

Bioethics for clinicians: 11. Euthanasia and assisted suicide

Euthanasia and assisted suicide involve taking deliberate action to end or assist in ending the life of another person on compassionate grounds. There is considerable disagreement about the acceptability of these acts and about whether they are ethically distinct from decisions to forgo life-sustaining treatment. Euthanasia and assisted suicide are punishable offences under Canadian criminal law, despite increasing public pressure for a more permissive policy. Some Canadian physicians would be willing to practise euthanasia and assisted suicide if these acts were legal. In practice, physicians must differentiate between respecting competent decisions to forgo treatment, providing appropriate palliative care, and acceeding to a request for euthanasia or assisted suicide. Physicians who believe that euthanasia and assisted suicide should be legally accepted in Canada should pursue their convictions only through legal and democratic means.     

Een cultuurvergelijkend onderzoek naar behandelbesluiten van artsen met betrekking tot demente verpleeghuispatiënten met pneumonie

A cross-cultural study of physician treatment decisions for demented nursing home patients who develop pneumoniaThis qualitative interview study in the Netherlands and North Carolina (US) found that physician treatment decisions are influenced by contextual differences in physician training and healthcare delivery in the US and the Netherlands. Dutch physicians treating nursing home residents with dementia and pneumonia assumed active, primary responsibility for treatment decisions while US physicians were more passive and deferential to family preferences, even in cases where they considered the families’ wishes inappropriate. Dutch physicians knew their patients well and made treatment decisions based on what they perceived was in the best interest of the patient while US physicians reported limited knowledge of their nursing home patients due to a lack of contact time. Efforts to improve care for patients with poor quality of life who lack decision-making capacity must consider the context of societal values, physician training, and the processes by which physicians negotiate patient and family preferences.     

One hospital's experience with a "Do not resuscitate" policy.

A "No not resuscitate" policy was instituted at McMaster University Medical Centre, Hamilton, in January 1979. Its objectives were to ensure that physicians decide on the appropriateness of resuscitation attempts before they might be needed; to have each physician consult his or her patients, or the families of incompetent patients, to determine their wishes concerning further treatment; and to provide legal protection of or physicians and the hospital in regard to the policy. To determine the effectiveness of the "Do not resuscitate" policy a questionnaire was sent to a sample of the professional staff of the hospital; the overall response rate was 87%. The respondents felt that a better way of informing hospital staff of the policy and its objectives was needed. However, the results of the questionnaire suggested that, on the whole, the policy was perceived as beneficial to both patients and physicians at the hospital.     

Canadian physicians' attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines

OBJECTIVE: To assess Canadian physicians'' confidence in, attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, self-administered mailed survey. PARTICIPANTS: Stratified random sample of 3000 Canadian physicians; 1878 (62.6%) responded. SETTING: Canada. OUTCOME MEASURES: Physicians'' use of various information sources; familiarity with and confidence in guidelines; attitudes about guidelines and their effect on medical care; rating of importance of guidelines and other sources of information in clinical decision-making; rating of importance of various considerations in deciding whether to adopt a set of guidelines; and rating of usefulness of different formats for presenting guidelines. MAIN RESULTS: In all, 52% of the respondents reported using guidelines at least monthly, substantially less frequently than traditional information sources. Most of the respondents expressed confidence in guidelines issued by various physician organizations, but 51% to 77% were not confident in guidelines issued by federal or provincial health ministries or by health insurance plans. The respondents were generally positive about guidelines (e.g., over 50% strongly agreed that they are a convenient source of advice and good educational tools); however, 22% to 26% had concerns about loss of autonomy, the rigidity of guidelines and decreased satisfaction with medical practice. Endorsement by respected colleagues or major organizations was identified as very important by 78% and 62% of the respondents respectively in deciding whether to adopt a set of guidelines in their practice. User friendliness of the guidelines format was thought to be very important by 62%; short pamphlets, manuals summarizing a number of guidelines, journal articles and pocket cards summarizing guidelines were the preferred formats (identified as most useful by 50% to 62% of the respondents). CONCLUSIONS: Canadian physicians, although generally positive about guidelines and confident in those developed by clinicians, have not yet integrated the use of guidelines into their practices to a large extent. Our results suggest that respected organizations and opinion leaders should be involved in the development of guidelines and that the acceptability of any proposed format and medium for guidelines presentation should be pretested.     

Physician-patient sexual contact. Prevalence and problems.

To document the current prevalence of physician-patient sexual contact and to estimate its effect on involved patients, 10,000 family practitioners, internists, obstetrician-gynecologists, and surgeons were surveyed. Of the 1,891 respondents, 9% acknowledged sexual contact with 1 or more patients. Even in the unlikely case that none of the nonrespondents had sexual contact with patients, its prevalence among all 10,000 physicians surveyed would still be 2%. Of respondents, 23% had at least 1 patient who reported sexual contact with another physician; 63% thought this contact was "always harmful" to the patients. Almost all (94%) responding physicians opposed sexual contact with current patients; 37% also opposed sexual contact with former patients. More than half of respondents (56%) indicated that physician-patient sexual contact had never been addressed in their training; only 3% had participated in a continuing education course focusing on this issue. Clear and enforceable medical ethics codes concerning physician-patient sexual contact are needed, as well as preventive educational programs for medical schools and residency programs.     

Basis for Physician Recommendations for Adjuvant Radioiodine Therapy in Early-Stage Thyroid Carcinoma: Principal Findings of the Canadian-American Thyroid Cancer Survey

ObjectiveTo explore physician recommendations regarding radioiodine remnant ablation (RRA) as adjuvant treatment in early-stage well-differentiated thyroid carcinoma (WDTC), their rationale for administration of RRA, and their willingness to involve patients’ opinions in decision making about the use of RRA.MethodsWe surveyed a representative sample of specialty physicians in Canada and the United States and asked survey participants whether they would recommend adjuvant RRA after thyroidectomy for a 1.6-cm papillary thyroid carcinoma (Likert scale of agreement responses from 1 to 7; strong agreement ≥ 6). Factor analysis was performed to explore the rationale for recommendations. We asked whether physicians accepted the role of patients’ preferences in decision making about administration of RRA, and backward conditional logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of strong acceptance.ResultsThe effective response rate for the survey was 56.3% (486 of 864), with 62.8% (295 of 470 respondents) strongly recommending RRA. Strong RRA recommendations were founded in opinions that RRA (1) decreases WDTC-related mortality and recurrence and (2) facilitates WDTC follow-up at low risk of adverse effects. Approximately a third of the survey respondents (152 of 474) strongly agreed with incorporation of patients’ preferences in decision making regarding the use of RRA. Physicians without firm convictions about the efficacy of RRA in decreasing disease-related outcomes and those practicing in the United States were most likely to indicate strong support for incorporating patients’ preferences in decision making about RRA.ConclusionThe recommendations of physicians regarding use of adjuvant RRA are founded in beliefs in intervention efficacy and follow-up practices. Physicians in medical practice in the United States and those without strong convictions about RRA efficacy are most likely to incorporate patients’ views in individualizing decisions about RRA therapy. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:175-184)     

Annonce des résultats en médecine nucléaire : enjeux et réflexions. «: Informer le patient,ce n’est pas l’obliger à entendre,mais le préparer à comprendre » - Article 7 de la charte du GT Ethique de la SFMN

Announcing ant delivering results to patients from nuclear medicine tests, and particularly with PET imaging, can vary profoundly from a department to another, even from a physician to another. French regulation regarding patients’ information and access to their health data as well as the National Cancer Institute's (Institut national du cancer–INCa) most recent recommendations concerning cancer announcement ask all medical imaging specialists (nuclear medicine physicians and radiologists) to be more implicated in the announcement process. Moreover, and above all legal considerations, it is ethically difficult to refuse any kind of medical communication to a demanding patient and let that patient, sometimes alone, discover the results without any kind of medical comments from the specialist who wrote the report. Such heterogeneity is real and must therefore be understood and explored. The arguments given by physicians who do not give results or who are not implicated in cancer announcement are analyzed in a non-dogmatic fashion to find concrete answers to patients’ legitimate expectancies.     

Walk-in clinics: implications for family practice.

To understand better the reasons for the growth in popularity of walk-in clinics in Canada we surveyed 321 patients with a regular physician in Toronto who attended a walk-in clinic in the same city over a 16-day period in February 1988. They were asked their reason for attending the clinic, their perception of the urgency of their problem, their choices as alternatives to walk-in clinics and their satisfaction and concerns with the type of care received at the clinic. The three most common reasons for attending the clinic were convenient location (in 33% of the cases), inability to see their regular physician soon enough (in 16%) and no appointment needed (in 13%). Most (80%) of the patients felt that they needed medical attention within 24 hours after the onset of their problem. Most (83%) of the respondents would have sought medical attention at another walk-in clinic, from their regular physician or at an emergency department had the clinic been closed. Only 36% and 18% of the patients respectively responded that their regular physician worked evenings or weekends. Most of the visits to the clinic were outside regular weekday business hours. The level of satisfaction with the service received at the clinic was high. The extended hours and no-appointment philosophy of walk-in clinics, coupled with family physicians'' reluctance to work evenings and weekends, have made such clinics an attractive option for patients with primary care problems that they believe require prompt attention.     

Socioeconomic and demographic correlates of medical care and health practices

using a 2-stage stratified sampling procedure, a random sample of 1021 rural families in North Arcot District of Tamil Nadu State in South India was studied to determine the interrelationships of utilization of medical care and health behavior with social, demographic and economic factors. Distance from a town, education, and accessibility of medical facilities seem to play a prominent role in the various decision making processes. 81.5% of respondents preferred only home treatment for common ailments at the initial stages of the disease. Of the remainder 1/2 preferred to go to a hospital and the other 1/2 chose a qualified physician. If the ailment persisted, 53% preferred to go to a hospital and 43% to a physician. The 1st choice for outside medical care for 44.8% of the respondents was a private medical practitioner, for 42.9% it was the government hospital and for the remaining 11.4% it was a nearly clinic or private hospital. In 88% of the cases, the head of the household met all the expenses. In only 4% of the cases were the expenses met by the employer or through another arrangement. Nearly 2/3 of the respondents agreed and 2i% disagreed that treatment would be better if provided free of cost and most thought it would be improved if health facilities were situated within the village itself. At the initial stages of common ailments some 90% of those residing within 5 km from a town said that they would treat themselves at home. If the ailment persisted, 52.4% preferred to go to the hospital and 43.7% to approach a physician. Only 63.7% of those living beyond 10 km from town preferred home treatment during early stages, and when the ailment persisted, 45% preferred the hospital while 55% preferred to approach a physician. 90% of respondents with lower incomes preferred home treatment for common ailments in the initial stages, compared to 56% of those with higher incomes. The proportion choosing a private medical practitioner as the 1st choice is much lower in the lowest income groups than in the highest income group. Those in the upper income groups preferred the source of medical care where they could get quick relief; lower income groups preferred the source of free services. The proportion who said they would approach a physician even during the initial stages of ailments increased significantly with education. The proportion whose 1st choice was a government hospital declined as education increased.     

Involving consumers in the development of an educational program for cystic fibrosis carrier screening.

Input from consumers of health care was sought in developing an educational program to be provided to individuals who are considering carrier testing for cystic fibrosis (CF). In addition, we assessed the ability of health professionals to predict consumers' priorities with regard to such information. A focus group of six middle school teachers formulated questions that they would ask in trying to decide whether they wanted carrier screening for CF. Then, other adults with (n = 39) and without (n = 60) a family history of CF were presented with the questions and were asked to select the questions in the order in which they would want them answered if offered the carrier test. After each question was answered, they were asked whether they would want the carrier test if it were offered to them. CF clinic staff, clinical geneticists, and genetic counselors (n = 31) were asked to select the questions in the order in which they believed that an adult from the general population would want them answered. There were no differences in the order in which adults with and without a family history of CF would want questions answered. Consumers would want to learn about the carrier test as well as their risk of being a carrier and of having a child with CF, before receiving information on reproductive options and the effect that a child with CF would have on the family. Of the 44% of consumers who changed their mind about wanting screening during the course of selecting questions, 52% did so after the first question that they selected.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Adversaries at the Bedside: Advance Care Plans and Future Welfare

Advance care planning refers to the process of determining how one wants to be cared for in the event that one is no longer competent to make one's own medical decisions. Some have argued that advance care plans often fail to be normatively binding on caretakers because those plans do not reflect the interests of patients once they enter an incompetent state. In this article, we argue that when the core medical ethical principles of respect for patient autonomy, honest and adequate disclosure of information, institutional transparency, and concern for patient welfare are upheld, a policy that would allow for the disregard of advance care plans is self‐defeating. This is because when the four principles are upheld, a patient's willingness to undergo treatment depends critically on the willingness of her caretakers to honor the wishes she has outlined in her advance care plan. A patient who fears that her caretakers will not honor her wishes may choose to avoid medical care so as to limit the influence of her caretakers in the future, which may lead to worse medical outcomes than if she had undergone care. In order to avoid worse medical outcomes and uphold the four core principles, caregivers who are concerned about the future welfare of their patients should focus on improving advance care planning and commit to honoring their patients’ advance care plans.     

Is deleting the digital rectal examination a good idea?

Although the supply of physicians in the United States has doubled during the past 20 years, there is still disagreement as to whether we currently have or should expect a significant surplus of physicians. The evidence suggests that despite the rapid expansion in the pool of available physicians, serious physician shortages persist for certain rural populations, ethnic and occupational groups, and other medically disadvantaged segments of the population. Medical students'' declining interest in rural practice and primary care specialties suggests that problems of geographic and specialty maldistribution may worsen despite a rising population of physicians. It is unlikely that a significant physician surplus will develop unless there is a conscious attempt to limit the proportion of national wealth expended on medical care. Pockets of shortage can be reduced by broadening the availability of health insurance, lessening large income disparities between different specialties, changing the way teaching institutions are reimbursed for their training costs, and supporting direct governmental service programs such as the National Health Service Corps.     

Referral Patterns for Patients With High-Risk Thyroid Cancer

ObjectiveKnowledge of referral patterns for specialty cancer care is sparse. Information on both the need and reasons for referral of high-risk, well-differentiated thyroid cancer patients should provide a foundation for eliminating obstacles to appropriate patient referrals and improving patient care.MethodsWe surveyed 370 endocrinologists involved in thyroid cancer management. From information in a clinical vignette, respondents were asked to identify the reasons they would need to refer a high-risk patient to a more specialized facility for care. We performed multivariable analysis controlling for hospital and physician characteristics.ResultsThirty-two percent of respondents reported never referring thyroid cancer patients to another facility. Of those that would refer a high-risk patient to another facility, the opportunity for a patient to enter a clinical trial was the most common reason reported (44%), followed by high-dose radioactive iodine (RAI) with or without dosimetry (33%), lateral neck dissection (24%), and external beam radiation (15%). In multivariable analysis, endocrinologists with a higher percentage of their practice devoted to thyroid cancer care were significantly less likely to refer patients to another facility (P = .003).ConclusionsThe majority of endocrinologists treating thyroid cancer patients report referring a high-risk patient to another facility for some or all of their care. Knowledge of the patterns of physician referrals and the likelihood of need for referral are key to understanding discrepancies in referral rates and obstacles in the referral process. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:638-643)