Morphological changes to somatotroph cells and in vitro individual GH release, in male rats treated with recombinant human GH

The effect of in vivo chronic administration of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) on morphology and individual GH release in somatotroph cells was evaluated in young male Wistar rats. Over an 18-day period, 30-day-old male rats were injected daily with 1.5 1U rhGH/kg (GPG group) or saline (VPG group) by subcutaneous injection. Electron-immunocytochemical, ultrastructural and morphometric studies of somatotroph cells were carried out. Additionally, rat pituitary cells were dispersed and overall and individual GH release was studied by radioimmunoassay and cell immunoblot assay (quantified by image analysis), respectively. The ultrastructure and size of somatotroph cells did not change, but volume density of secretion granules was reduced (p<0.01) by previous in vivo GH treatment. At four days, basal GH release of rat pituitary cell monolayer cultures was lower in the GPG group than in the VPG group (p<0.05); after 12 hours of culture, GHRH stimulation of GH release was lower in the GPG group than in the VPG group (p<0.05), and GHRH+SRIH inhibited GH release in the GPG group (p<0.05), but not in the VPG group. The percentage of somatotroph cells was not modified, but the ratio of strongly/weakly GH-immunostained cells had changed; weakly GH-immunostained cells increased from 34% to 55%. Moreover, in vitro treatment with GHRH, SRIH, and both, easily changed the strongly/weakly GH-immunostained cell ratio. Individual GH release, however, was not changed by previous in vivo GH treatment, although GHRH preferably stimulated a subpopulation of GH cells and SRIH did not inhibit individual GH release. These data suggest that exogenous chronic rhGH treatment down-regulates somatotroph function by modifying the proportion of GH cell subpopulation.     

Effects of long-term treatment with growth hormone-releasing peptide-2 in the GHRH knockout mouse

Growth hormone (GH) secretagogues (GHS) stimulate GH secretion in vivo in humans and in animals. They act on the ghrelin receptor, expressed in both the hypothalamus and the pituitary. It is unknown whether GHSs act predominantly by increasing the release of hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) or by acting directly on the somatotroph cells. We studied whether a potent GHS could stimulate growth in the absence of endogenous GHRH. To this end, we used GHRH knockout (GHRH-KO) mice. These animals have proportionate dwarfism due to severe GH deficiency (GHD) and pituitary hypoplasia due to reduced somatotroph cell mass. We treated male GHRH-KO mice for 6 wk (from week 1 to week 7 of age) with GH-releasing peptide-2 (GHRP-2, 10 microg s.c. twice a day). Chronic treatment with GHRP-2 failed to stimulate somatotroph cell proliferation and GH secretion and to promote longitudinal growth. GHRP-2-treated mice showed an increase in total body weight compared with placebo-treated animals, due to worsening of the body composition alterations typical of GHD animals. These data demonstrate that GHRP-2 failed to reverse the severe GHD caused by lack of GHRH.     

GH responses to GHRH and GHRP-6 in Streptozotocin (STZ)-diabetic rats

GH responses to GHRH, the physiologic hypothalamic stimulus, and GHRP-6, a synthetic hexapeptide that binds the Ghrelin receptor, were studied in rats treated with streptozotocin (STZ), an experimental model of diabetes. Sprague-Dawley male rats received a single injection either of STZ (70 mg/Kg in 0.01 M SSC, i.p.) or of the vehicle (0.01 M SSC). GH responses were challenged with two different doses of GHRH (1 and 10 microg/kg) or GHRP-6 (3 and 30 microg/kg) and with a combination of both at low (1 + 3 microg/kg) or high (10 + 30 microg/kg) doses, respectively. We observed a dose-dependent effect for GH responses to GHRH both in STZ-treated rats and in controls. However, we could not find significant differences between STZ-rats and controls. GH responses to GHRP-6 occurred in a dose-dependent manner in STZ-rats, but not in controls. GH responses to GHRP-6 in both groups were clearly lower than those elicited by GHRH. GH responses to 30 microg/Kg of GHRP-6 were significantly greater in STZ-rats than in controls (AUC: 3549.9 +/- 1001.4 vs. 2046.4 +/- 711.7; p<0.05). The combined administration of GHRH plus GHRP-6 was the most potent stimuli for GH in both groups. The administration of doses in the lower range (1 + 3 microg/Kg, GHRH + GHRP-6 respectively) induced a great peak of GH in STZ-rats and in control rats, revealing a synergistic effect of GHRH and GHRP-6 in both groups. When the higher doses were administered (10 + 30 microg/kg), GH levels in time 5, and AUC were significantly higher in control rats. In addition, a negative correlation between WT (weight tendency) values and GH responses, represented as AUC, could be established in STZ-rats (r2=-0.566, p=0.004 for GHRH; r2=-0.412, p=0.028 for GHRP-6). Thus, the more negative the values of WT were, the more severe the metabolic alteration and, therefore, the higher the GH response to GHRH and GHRHP-6. In conclusion, our results do not support the existence of a functional hypothalamic hypertone of SS in diabetic rats, as GH responses were not usually reduced in STZ-rats, except when both secretagogues were administered together at the higher doses. Besides, GH responses to GHRH and GHRP-6 were inversely correlated with the severity of the metabolic alteration in STZ-rats, meaning that worse glycaemic control promoted higher GH secretion. These results resemble those found in humans, where GH responses to secretagogues are increased in type-1 diabetes and depend on hyperglycaemia, and are representative of not well-controlled insulin-dependent diabetic status.     

Robust growth hormone (GH) secretion in aged female rats co-administered GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH)

Aging is associated with a blunted growth hormone (GH) secretory response to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), in vivo. The objective of the present study was to assess the effects of aging on the GH secretory response to GH-releasing hexapeptide (GHRP-6), a synthetic GH secretagogue. GHRP-6 (30 micrograms/kg) was administered alone or in combination with GHRH (2 micrograms/kg) to anesthetized female Fischer 344 rats, 3 or 19 months of age. The peptides were co-administered to determine the effect of aging upon the potentiating effect of GHRP-6 on GHRH activity. The increase in plasma GH as a function of time following administration of GHRP-6 was lower (p less than 0.001) in old rats than in young rats; whereas the increase in plasma GH secretion as a function of time following co-administration of GHRP-6 and GHRH was higher (p less than 0.001) in old rats than in young rats (mean Cmax = 8539 +/- 790.6 micrograms/l vs. 2970 +/- 866 micrograms/l, respectively; p less than 0.01). Since pituitary GH concentrations in old rats were lower than in young rats (257.0 +/- 59.8 micrograms/mg wet wt. vs. 639.7 +/- 149.2 micrograms/mg wet wt., respectively; p less than 0.03), the results suggested that GH functional reserve in old female rats was not linked to pituitary GH concentration. The differential responses of old rats to individually administered and co-administered GHRP-6 are important because they demonstrate that robust and immediate GH secretion can occur in old rats that are appropriately stimulated. The data further suggest that the cellular processes subserving GH secretion are intact in old rats, and that age-related decrements in GH secretion result from inadequate stimulation, rather than to maladaptive changes in the mechanism of GH release.     

Peripheral estrogen receptor-alpha selectively modulates the waveform of GH secretory bursts in healthy women

Estradiol (E(2)) drives growth hormone (GH) secretion via estrogen receptors (ER) located in the hypothalamus and pituitary gland. ERalpha is expressed in GH releasing hormone (GHRH) neurons and GH-secreting cells (somatotropes). Moreover, estrogen regulates receptors for somatostatin, GHR peptide (GHRP, ghrelin), and GH itself, while potentiating signaling by IGF-I. Given this complex network, one cannot a priori predict the selective roles of hypothalamic compared with pituitary ER pathways. To make such a distinction, we introduce an investigative model comprising 1) specific ERalpha blockade with a pure antiestrogen, fulvestrant, that does not penetrate the blood-brain barrier; 2) graded transdermal E(2) administration, which doubles GH concentrations in postmenopausal women; 3) stimulation of fasting GH secretion by pairs of GHRH, GHRP-2 (a ghrelin analog), and l-arginine (to putatively limit somatostatin outflow); and 4) implementation of a flexible waveform deconvolution model to estimate the shape of secretory bursts independently of their size. The combined strategy unveiled that 1) E(2) prolongs GH secretory bursts via fulvestrant-antagonizable mechanisms; 2) fulvestrant extends GHRH/GHRP-2-stimulated secretory bursts; 3) l-arginine/GHRP-2 stimulation lengthens GH secretory bursts whether or not E(2) is present; 4) E(2) limits the capability of l-arginine/GHRP-2 to expand GH secretory bursts, and fulvestrant does not inhibit this effect; and 5) E(2) and/or fulvestrant do not alter the time evolution of l-arginine/GHRH-induced GH secretory bursts. The collective data indicate that peripheral ERalpha-dependent mechanisms determine the shape (waveform) of in vivo GH secretory bursts and that such mechanisms operate with secretagogue selectivity.     

Induction of growth hormone (GH) mRNA by pulsatile GH-releasing hormone in rats is pattern specific

Growth hormone-releasing hormone (GHRH) is a main inducer of growth hormone (GH) pulses in most species studied to date. There is no information regarding the pattern of GHRH secretion as a regulator of GH gene expression. We investigated the roles of the parameters of exogenous GHRH administration (frequency, amplitude, and total amount) upon induction of pituitary GH mRNA, GH content, and somatic growth in the female rat. Continuous GHRH infusions were ineffective in altering GH mRNA levels, GH stores, or weight gain. Changing GHRH pulse amplitude between 4, 8, and 16 microg/kg at a constant frequency (Q3.0 h) was only moderately effective in augmenting GH mRNA levels, whereas the 8 microg/kg and 16 microg/kg dosages stimulated weight gain by as much as 60%. When given at a 1.5-h frequency, GHRH doubled the amount of GH mRNA, elevated pituitary GH stores, and stimulated body weight gain. In the rat model, pulsatile but not continuous GHRH administration is effective in inducing pituitary GH mRNA and GH content as well as somatic growth. These studies suggest that the greater growth rate, pituitary mRNA levels, and GH stores seen in male compared with female rats are likely mediated, in part, by the endogenous episodic GHRH secretory pattern present in males.     

Mutual priming effects of GHRH and arginine on GH secretion: informative procedure for evaluating GH secretory dynamics

To establish a single and reliable test for evaluating GH secretion, we examined successive GH provocation by two agents with different modes of action: GHRH and arginine (Arg). In 4 normal subjects, a bolus injection of 50 micrograms of GHRH followed by 0.5 g/kg Arg infusion after 90 min evoked two GH peaks and the priming of the GHRH potentiated Arg-induced GH peak by 88% of that by Arg alone. In contrast, Arg pretreatment suppressed the GHRH-induced GH peak to a level of 15%. This inhibitory effect of Arg priming was not recovered by an increase in the GHRH dose (100 micrograms) or by prolongation of the GHRH injection period to 180 min. During Arg infusion, plasma somatostatin (SRIH) was significantly reduced and there was a linear correlation between Arg-induced GH peaks and basal TSH levels. This suggests that GH release by Arg is mediated by suppression of hypothalamic SRIH. One subject showed a blunted GH peak in response to GHRH but a normal peak in response to Arg repeatedly, suggesting an endogenous hypertonicity of SRIH. In 4 other normal subjects, the effect of endogenous GH fluctuation on the GHRH-Arg test was examined in the morning, afternoon and evening. The GH secretory profile was fairly consistent in individuals, but in 2 of them, GH response to GHRH was exaggerated in the evening and Arg-unresponsiveness ensued. This potentiation of GH release appears to be due to an increase in endogenous GHRH secretion or a decrease in SRIH tone. The GHRH-Arg test is therefore able to evaluate GH secretory dynamics through two major mechanisms, GHRH stimulation and SRIH inhibition in a single procedure, reducing the incidence of false negative GH response to Arg.     

Insulin-induced hypoglycemia, L-dopa and arginine stimulate GH secretion through different mechanisms in man

We sought to clarify the mechanisms of growth hormone (GH) secretion induced by insulin hypoglycemia, L-dopa, and arginine in man. The secretion of GH as measured by increased plasma level, in response to oral administration of 500 mg L-dopa or 30 min-infusion of arginine, was not modified by prior intravenous administration of 200 micrograms GH-releasing hormone (GHRH). It was, however, completely blocked by preadministered 50 micrograms SMS201-995, a long-acting somatostatin (SRIH) analog. GH release with 200 micrograms GHRH was completely blocked by 100 micrograms SMS201-995. GH secretion caused by insulin-induced hypoglycemia was significantly reduced but still present after administration of 100 micrograms of the analog. These results suggest that a suppression of SRIH release may be partially involved in the stimulatory mechanism of GH secretion by L-dopa. Coadministration of GHRH accentuated the stimulatory effect of arginine on GH secretion. Arginine significantly raised plasma TSH levels. These findings suggest that arginine suppresses SRIH release from the hypothalamus to cause GH secretion because SRIH suppresses TSH secretion. It is also suggested that some factor (or factors) other than GHRH and SRIH are involved in the mechanism by which insulin-induced hypoglycemia stimulates GH secretion, because the effect of insulin was not fully blocked in the presence of SRIH analog. Thus all the tests for GH release appear to act via different mechanisms.     

Effect of long-term GHRH and somatostatin administration on GH release and body weight in prepubertal female rats

In order to find a chronic GHRH administration capable of stimulating growth rate without depleting pituitary GH content, prepubertal female rats were subcutaneously (sc) treated with GHRH (1-29)-NH2 and somatostatin (SS). In experiment 1, the rats received sc injections of GHRH and cyclic natural SS for 19 days. In the second study, female rats were continuously treated during 21 days with GHRH, using a slow release pellet, alone or combined with one daily injection of long acting SS (octreotide). In experiment 1, body weight was significantly increased when GHRH was administered at the highest daily dosage (1200 microg/day), accompanied by an slight increment in pituitary GH content. Hypothalamic SS concentrations decreased when GHRH or SS were administered alone whereas the combined treatment with both peptides did not modify this parameter, which suggests the existence of a balance between the chronic actions of both peptides on hypothalamus. In experiment 2, the continuous infusion of GHRH increased plasma GH levels and tended to enhance pituitary GH content. Nevertheless, GHRH effect was not effective enough to increase body weight. By adding one daily injection of SS both GHRH effects on the pituitary gland were abolished. Our study indicates that female rats retain responsiveness to chronic GHRH and SS treatments at both pituitary and hypothalamic levels.     

Generation of growth hormone pulsatility in women: evidence against somatostatin withdrawal as pulse initiator

To test whether endogenous hypothalamic somatostatin (SRIH) fluctuations are playing a role in the generation of growth hormone (GH) pulses, continuous subcutaneous octreotide infusion (16 microg/h) was used to create constant supraphysiological somatostatinergic tone. Six healthy postmenopausal women (age 67 +/- 3 yr, body mass index 24.7 +/- 1.2 kg/m(2)) were studied during normal saline and octreotide infusion providing stable plasma octreotide levels of 2,567 +/- 37 pg/ml. Blood samples were obtained every 10 min for 24 h, and plasma GH was measured with a sensitive chemiluminometric assay. Octreotide infusion suppressed 24-h mean GH by 84 +/- 3% (P = 0.00026), GH pulse amplitude by 90 +/- 3% (P = 0.00031), and trough GH by 54 +/- 5% (P = 0.0012), whereas GH pulse frequency remained unchanged. The response of GH to GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) was not suppressed, and the GH response to GH-releasing peptide-6 (GHRP-6) was unaffected. We conclude that, in women, periodic declines in hypothalamic SRIH secretion are not the driving force of endogenous GH pulses, which are most likely due to episodic release of GHRH and/or the endogenous GHRP-like ligand.     

Estimation of the size and shape of GH secretory bursts in healthy women using a physiological estradiol clamp and variable-waveform deconvolution model

Because estrogen production and age are strong covariates, distinguishing their individual impact on hypothalamo-pituitary regulation of growth hormone (GH) output is difficult. In addition, at fixed elimination kinetics, systemic GH concentration patterns are controlled by three major signal types [GH-releasing hormone (GHRH), GH-releasing peptide (GHRP, ghrelin), and somatostatin (SS)] and by four dynamic mechanisms [the number, mass (size), and shape (waveform) of secretory bursts and basal (time invariant) GH secretion]. The present study introduces an investigative strategy comprising 1) imposition of an experimental estradiol clamp in pre- (PRE) and postmenopausal (POST) women; 2) stimulation of fasting GH secretion by each of GHRH, GHRP-2 (a ghrelin analog), and l-arginine (to putatively limit SSergic restraint); and 3) implementation of a flexible-waveform deconvolution model to estimate basal GH secretion simultaneously with the size and shape of secretory bursts, conditional on pulse number. The combined approach unveiled the following salient percent POST/PRE contrasts: 1) only 27% as much GH secreted in bursts during fasting (P < 0.001); 2) markedly attenuated burstlike GH secretion in response to bolus GHRP-2 (29%), bolus GHRH (30%), l-arginine (37%), constant GHRP-2 (38%), and constant GHRH (42%) (age contrasts, 0.0016 相似文献   

Neither intravenous nor intracerebroventricular administration of obestatin affects the secretion of GH, PRL, TSH and ACTH in rats

To examine the effect of obestatin, a recently identified peptide derived from preproghrelin, on pituitary hormone secretion, obestatin was administered in anesthetized male rats. Intravenous administration of obestatin did not show any effect on plasma GH, PRL, ACTH and TSH levels. Since obestatin has been reported to have opposite effects of ghrelin in regulating food intake, gastric emptying and intestinal contractility, GH suppressive effect, which is opposite effect of ghrelin, was tested. Intravenous administration of GHRH or GHRP-2, a ghrelin receptor ligand, resulted in a marked plasma GH elevation. However obestatin did not show any effect on GHRH- or GHRP-2-induced GH rise. Furthermore intracerebroventricular administration of obestatin also did not influence plasma GH, PRL, ACTH and TSH levels. These findings suggest that obestatin has no effect on pituitary hormone secretions despite the presence of GPR39, a receptor for obestatin, in the pituitary.     

Influence of chronic treatment with the growth hormone secretagogue Ipamorelin,in young female rats: somatotroph response in vitro

Growth hormone (GH) is secreted in the anterior pituitary gland by the somatotroph cells. Secretion is regulated by growth hormone releasing hormone (GHRH) and somatostatin. Morever, GH secretagogues (GHS) can exert a considerable effect on GH secretion. In order to determine the effects of chronic treatment with the GHS Ipamorelin on the composition of the somatotroph cell population and on somatotroph GH content, an in vitro analysis was performed of the percentage of somatotroph cells (% of total), the ratio of different GH cell types (strongly/weakly-staining) and individual GH content, in pituitary cell cultures obtained from young female rats receiving Ipamorelin over 21 days (Ipamorelin group) and the effects were compared with those of GHRH (GHRH group) or saline (saline group). The ultrastructure of somatotroph cells did not change, but the volume density of secretion granules was increased (P<0.05) by previous in vivo Ipamorelin or GHRH treatment. In 3-day basal pituitary cell monolayer cultures, the percentage of somatotroph cells showed no modifications between groups, nor was there any change in the ratio of strongly/weakly immunostaining GH cells. In the Ipamorelin group alone, in vitro treatment with Ipamorelin (10(-8) M), or GHRP 6 (10(-8) M), or GHRH (10(-8) M) for 4 hours, increased the percentage of somatotroph cells, without modifying the ratio of strongly/weakly immunostained GH cells. Basal intracellular GH content in somatotroph cells over 4 hours was lower in the Ipamorelin group and the GHRH group than in the saline group. Only in the Ipamorelin group did Ipamorelin (10(-8) M), GHRP 6 (10(-8) M) and GHRH (10(-8) M) prompt increased intracellular GH content. These data suggest that, at least in the young female rat, the GHS Ipamorelin is able to exert a dynamic control effect on the somatotroph population and on GH hormone content.     

Autocrine and paracrine effects of peptides on human pituitary cells.

In contrast to normal human pituitaries, GH-secreting adenomas cannot process in vivo ProSRIH whereas they do it in vitro. The existence of an endogenous factor able to inhibit ProSRIH processing in vivo was postulated and such a role was analyzed for GHRH. Results showed that when GH adenomas are incubated in vitro with GHRH 10(-8) M, their ProSRIH contents are decreased, percent inhibition being negatively correlated to the amount of endogenously released GHRH. When incubation is performed in the presence of GHRH antibody in order to block the effect of endogenous GHRH, Pro-SRIH content is increased. The same effects are observed on SRIH release: inhibition by GHRH, stimulation by GHRH antibody. Normal rabbit serum had no effect. It may therefore be concluded that the absence of ProSRIH maturation observed in adenomas in vivo may be the consequence of the GHRH release that is known to be higher from GH adenomas than from normal pituitaries.     

Age-related differences in growth hormone (GH) regulation during strenuous exercise.

This study was designed to investigate the central neuroendocrine mechanisms by which exercise (EX) stimulates growth hormone (GH) release as a function of age. Twelve male subjects, six in their early-to-mid twenties and six in their late sixties or seventies, received a strong GH stimulus either as incremental EX until volitional exhaustion or by administration of GHRH alone or Hex alone two hours after a presumed maximal GH response to combined administration of GHRH plus hexarelin (Hex). Total GH availability was calculated as area under the curve (AUC) over time periods 0 - 120 and 120 - 240 min. The mean AUC in micro g/l x 120 min to GHRH+Hex in the younger group was approximately twice that in the older group (11,260, range 3,947 - 19,007 vs. 5,366, range 2,262 - 8,654). In younger males, the mean AUC to EX (509, range 0 - 1,151) was larger than to GHRH (119, range 0 - 543), but less than that to Hex (919, range 0 - 1,892). In the older group, GH responses to EX and GHRH were abolished (mean AUC: 112, range 0 - 285, and 156, range 30 - 493), respectively) in contrast to the response to Hex (1,077, range 189 - 1,780). These data indicate that maximal GH stimulation by GHRH+Hex results in greater desensitization of GHRH compared to Hex, irrespective of age. We postulate that the abolished responsiveness of GH to EX in older group is due to insufficient disinhibition of hypothalamic somatostatin activity and desensitization of GHRH, while the preserved activity of a central Hex-related pathway is not involved. The GH response to EX in younger males is due to complete inhibition of somatostatin activity and stimulation of a central Hex-related pathway in spite of GHRH desensitization. We conclude that a central Hex-related pathway is the primary factor for EX-induced GH release only in younger males.     

Growth hormone (GH) profiles with successive provocation by GH-releasing hormone and arginine in children: a clinical appraisal

To establish a single and reliable test for evaluating growth hormone (GH) secretion, we examined successive GH provocation by two agents with different modes of action, GH releasing-hormone (GHRH) and arginine (Arg) in 60 children of short stature, 6 patients with pituitary dwarfism and 9 normal young adults. Their GH profiles were qualitatively classified into 4 types: 25 children and 7 adults responded to both stimuli with 2 GH peaks (48.7 +/- 4.3 [SEM] micrograms/L for GHRH and 32.2 +/- 2.6 micrograms/L for Arg in children; 25.8 +/- 7.6 micrograms/L and 30.1 +/- 9.2 micrograms/L respectively in adults) (type A). A single peak for GHRH (57.7 +/- 4.6 micrograms/L) without an Arg-induced peak was obtained in 29 younger children (type B), which is considered to be a GHRH-dominant pattern. Two of them were diagnosed as hypothalamic GHRH deficiency based on a low nocturnal plasma GH and good response to GH treatment. Six adolescents and 2 adults showed a blunted response to GHRH (9.0 +/- 1.1 micrograms/L) but a normal response to Arg (40.6 +/- 9.5 micrograms/L) (type C), which appears to be caused by somatostatin (SRIH) hypertonicity. None with pituitary dwarfism responded to both stimuli (4.5 +/- 1.3 and 2.3 +/- 0.5 micrograms/L). Thus, the GHRH-Arg test makes it possible to evaluate the counterbalance between GHRH and SRIH as well as to differentiate pituitary GH deficiency from hypothalamic GHRH dysfunction.     

Growth hormone-releasing hormone and somatostatin in normal and tumoral human pituitaries.

In order to further understand the role of endogenous pituitary neuropeptides in pituitary hormonal content and secretion, GHRH, SRIH and GH contents were quantified in GH adenomas obtained from acromegalic patients with plasma GH levels either high (greater than 5 micrograms/l, range 11 to 550 micrograms/l, n = 11) or in the normal range (less than 5 micrograms/l, range 1 to 3.3 micrograms/l, n = 4). Values were compared to those found in normal human pituitaries. No relationship was found between GHRH content and plasma GH or between SRIH and GH content when considering together adenomas and normal pituitaries. Results showed that there is a positive relationship between GHRH and GH content: when GHRH content is high, GH content is also high (normal pituitaries and GH adenomas of acromegalic patients with high plasma GH) and when GHRH content is low, GH content is also low (GH adenomas of acromegalic patients with plasma GH in the normal range). Conversely, SRIH content is negatively related to plasma GH levels: when SRIH is present, plasma GH is in the normal range; when SRIH is undetectable, plasma GH is high.