Molecular crowding and RNA synergize to promote phase separation,microtubule interaction,and seeding of Tau condensates

Biomolecular condensation of the neuronal microtubule‐associated protein Tau (MAPT) can be induced by coacervation with polyanions like RNA, or by molecular crowding. Tau condensates have been linked to both functional microtubule binding and pathological aggregation in neurodegenerative diseases. We find that molecular crowding and coacervation with RNA, two conditions likely coexisting in the cytosol, synergize to enable Tau condensation at physiological buffer conditions and to produce condensates with a strong affinity to charged surfaces. During condensate‐mediated microtubule polymerization, their synergy enhances bundling and spatial arrangement of microtubules. We further show that different Tau condensates efficiently induce pathological Tau aggregates in cells, including accumulations at the nuclear envelope that correlate with nucleocytoplasmic transport deficits. Fluorescent lifetime imaging reveals different molecular packing densities of Tau in cellular accumulations and a condensate‐like density for nuclear‐envelope Tau. These findings suggest that a complex interplay between interaction partners, post‐translational modifications, and molecular crowding regulates the formation and function of Tau condensates. Conditions leading to prolonged existence of Tau condensates may induce the formation of seeding‐competent Tau and lead to distinct cellular Tau accumulations.     

Purine biosynthetic enzymes assemble into liquid-like condensates dependent on the activity of chaperone protein HSP90

Enzymes within the de novo purine biosynthetic pathway spatially organize into dynamic intracellular assemblies called purinosomes. The formation of purinosomes has been correlated with growth conditions resulting in high purine demand, and therefore, the cellular advantage of complexation has been hypothesized to enhance metabolite flux through the pathway. However, the properties of this cellular structure are unclear. Here, we define the purinosome in a transient expression system as a biomolecular condensate using fluorescence microscopy. We show that purinosomes, as denoted by formylglycinamidine ribonucleotide synthase granules in purine-depleted HeLa cells, are spherical and appear to coalesce when two come into contact, all liquid-like characteristics that are consistent with previously reported condensates. We further explored the biophysical and biochemical means that drive the liquid–liquid phase separation of these structures. We found that the process of enzyme condensation into purinosomes is likely driven by the oligomeric state of the pathway enzymes and not a result of intrinsic disorder, the presence of low-complexity domains, the assistance of RNA scaffolds, or changes in intracellular pH. Finally, we demonstrate that the heat shock protein 90 KDa helps to regulate the physical properties of the condensate and maintain their liquid-like state inside HeLa cells. We show that disruption of heat shock protein 90 KDa activity induced the transformation of formylglycinamidine ribonucleotide synthase clusters into more irregularly shaped condensates, suggesting that its chaperone activity is essential for purinosomes to retain their liquid-like properties. This refined view of the purinosome offers new insight into how metabolic enzymes spatially organize into dynamic condensates within human cells.     

Essence determines phenomenon: Assaying the material properties of biological condensates

Intracellular spaces are partitioned into separate compartments to ensure that numerous biochemical reactions and cellular functions take place in a spatiotemporally controlled manner. Biomacromolecules including proteins and RNAs undergo liquid–liquid phase separation and subsequent phase transition to form biological condensates with diverse material states. The material/physical properties of biological condensates are crucial for fulfilling their distinct physiological functions, and abnormal material properties can cause deleterious effects under pathological conditions. Here, we review recent studies showing the role of the material properties of biological condensates in their physiological functions. We also summarize several classic methods as well as newly emerging techniques for characterization and/or measurement of the material properties of biological condensates.     

Assembly of Mitotic Structures through Phase Separation

Cells compartmentalize biochemical reactions using organelles, which can be membrane enclosed or built entirely of proteins and ribonucleic acids. Recent studies indicate that many organelles that lack membranes have liquid-like properties, including the ability to flow, fuse, and undergo rapid internal rearrangement. The assembly of these “biomolecular condensates” has been described as liquid–liquid phase separation, whereby their constituent components demix from the cytoplasm, similar to water separating from oil. Other studies suggest that protein phase separation followed by maturation, where intramolecular connections strengthen over time, can lead to gel- or glass-like states. This review discusses how the principles of phase separation might help to understand the assembly and behavior of organelles that operate in mitosis, when the cell assembles the mitotic spindle to segregate chromosomes. Special attention is given to the mitotic pericentriolar material of centrosomes and the spindle matrix.     

Biochemical Timekeeping Via Reentrant Phase Transitions

Appreciation for the role of liquid–liquid phase separation in the functional organization of cellular matter has exploded in recent years. More recently there has been a growing effort to understand the principles of heterotypic phase separation, the demixing of multiple proteins and nucleic acids into a single functional condensate. A phase transition is termed reentrant if it involves the transformation of a system from one state into a macroscopically similar or identical state via at least two phase transitions elicited by variation of a single parameter. Reentrant liquid–liquid phase separation can occur when the condensation of one species is tuned by another. Reentrant phase transitions have been modeled in vitro using protein and RNA mixtures. These biochemical studies reveal two features of reentrant phase separation that are likely important to functional cellular condensates: (1) the ability to generate condensates with layered functional topologies, and (2) the ability to generate condensates whose composition and duration are self-limiting to enable a form of biochemical timekeeping. We relate these biochemical studies to potential cellular examples and discuss how layered topologies and self-regulation may impact key biological processes.     

Phase separation of chromatin and small RNA pathways in plants

Gene expression can be modulated by epigenetic mechanisms, including chromatin modifications and small regulatory RNAs. These pathways are unevenly distributed within a cell and usually take place in specific intracellular regions. Unfortunately, the fundamental driving force and biological relevance of such spatial differentiation is largely unknown. Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a natural propensity of demixing liquid phases and has been recently suggested to mediate the formation of biomolecular condensates that are relevant to diverse cellular processes. LLPS provides a mechanistic explanation for the self-assembly of subcellular structures by which the efficiency and specificity of certain cellular reactions are achieved. In plants, LLPS has been observed for several key factors in the chromatin and small RNA pathways. For example, the formation of facultative and obligate heterochromatin involves the LLPS of multiple relevant factors. In addition, phase separation is observed in a set of proteins acting in microRNA biogenesis and the small interfering RNA pathway. In this Focused Review, we highlight and discuss the recent findings regarding phase separation in the epigenetic mechanisms of plants.     

Regulation of biomolecular condensate dynamics by signaling

Biomolecular condensates are mesoscopic biomolecular assemblies devoid of long range order that contribute to important cellular functions. They form reversibly, are stabilized by numerous but relatively weak intermolecular interactions, and their formation can be regulated by various cellular signals including changes in local concentration, post-translational modifications, energy-consuming processes, and biomolecular interactions. Condensates formed by liquid–liquid phase separation are initially liquid but are metastable relative to hydrogels or irreversible solids that have been associated with protein aggregation diseases and are stabilized by stronger, more permanent interactions. As a consequence of this, a series of cellular mechanisms are available to regulate not only biomolecular condensation but also the physical properties of the condensates.     

Biomolecular condensates in neurodegeneration and cancer

The intracellular environment is partitioned into functionally distinct compartments containing specific sets of molecules and reactions. Biomolecular condensates, also referred to as membrane‐less organelles, are diverse and abundant cellular compartments that lack membranous enclosures. Molecules assemble into condensates by phase separation; multivalent weak interactions drive molecules to separate from their surroundings and concentrate in discrete locations. Biomolecular condensates exist in all eukaryotes and in some prokaryotes, and participate in various essential house‐keeping, stress‐response and cell type‐specific processes. An increasing number of recent studies link abnormal condensate formation, composition and material properties to a number of disease states. In this review, we discuss current knowledge and models describing the regulation of condensates and how they become dysregulated in neurodegeneration and cancer. Further research on the regulation of biomolecular phase separation will help us to better understand their role in cell physiology and disease.     

Cyclic dipeptide-based small molecules modulate zinc-mediated liquid–liquid phase separation of tau

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) is a complex physicochemical phenomenon mediated by multivalent transient weak interactions among macromolecules like polymers, proteins, and nucleic acids. It has implications in cellular physiology and disease conditions like cancer and neurodegenerative disorders. Many proteins associated with neurodegenerative disorders like RNA binding protein FUS (FUsed in Sarcoma), alpha-synuclein (α-Syn), TAR DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43), and tau are shown to undergo LLPS. Recently, the tau protein responsible for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and other tauopathies is shown to phase separate into condensates in vitro and in vivo. The diverse noncovalent interactions among the biomolecules dictate the complex LLPS phenomenon. There are limited chemical tools to modulate protein LLPS which has therapeutic potential for neurodegenerative disorders. We have rationally designed cyclic dipeptide (CDP)-based small-molecule modulators (SMMs) by integrating multiple chemical groups that offer diverse chemical interactions to modulate tau LLPS. Among them, compound 1c effectively inhibits and dissolves Zn-mediated tau LLPS condensates. The SMM also inhibits tau condensate-to-fibril transition (tau aggregation through LLPS). This approach of designing SMMs of LLPS establishes a novel platform that has potential implication for the development of therapeutics for neurodegenerative disorders.     

Conformational Freedom and Topological Confinement of Proteins in Biomolecular Condensates

The emergence of biomolecular condensation and liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) introduces a new layer of complexity into our understanding of cell and molecular biology. Evidence steadily grows indicating that condensates are not only implicated in physiology but also human disease. Macro- and mesoscale characterization of condensates as a whole have been instrumental in understanding their biological functions and dysfunctions. By contrast, the molecular level characterization of condensates and how condensates modify the properties of the molecules that constitute them thus far remain comparably scarce. In this minireview we summarize and discuss the findings of several recent studies that have focused on structure, dynamics, and interactions of proteins undergoing condensation. The mechanistic insights they provide help us identify the relevant properties nature and scientists can leverage to modulate the behavior of condensate systems. We also discuss the unique environment of the droplet surface and speculate on effects of topological constraints and physical exclusion on condensate properties.     

Get closer and make hotspots: liquid–liquid phase separation in plants

Liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) facilitates the formation of membraneless compartments in a cell and allows the spatiotemporal organization of biochemical reactions by concentrating macromolecules locally. In plants, LLPS defines cellular reaction hotspots, and stimulus‐responsive LLPS is tightly linked to a variety of cellular and biological functions triggered by exposure to various internal and external stimuli, such as stress responses, hormone signaling, and temperature sensing. Here, we provide an overview of the current understanding of physicochemical forces and molecular factors that drive LLPS in plant cells. We illustrate how the biochemical features of cellular condensates contribute to their biological functions. Additionally, we highlight major challenges for the comprehensive understanding of biological LLPS, especially in view of the dynamic and robust organization of biochemical reactions underlying plastic responses to environmental fluctuations in plants.     

Macromolecular regulators have matching effects on the phase equilibrium and interfacial tension of biomolecular condensates

The interfacial tension of phase‐separated biomolecular condensates affects their fusion and multiphase organization, and yet how this important property depends on the composition and interactions of the constituent macromolecules is poorly understood. Here we use molecular dynamics simulations to determine the interfacial tension and phase equilibrium of model condensate‐forming systems. The model systems consist of binary mixtures of Lennard‐Jones particles or chains of such particles. We refer to the two components as drivers and regulators; the former has stronger self‐interactions and hence a higher critical temperature (T _c) for phase separation. In previous work, we have shown that, depending on the relative strengths of driver‐regulator and driver‐driver interactions, regulators can either promote or suppress phase separation (i.e., increase or decrease T _c). Here we find that the effects of regulators on T _c quantitatively match the effects on interfacial tension (γ). This important finding means that, when a condensate‐forming system experiences a change in macromolecular composition or a change in intermolecular interactions (e.g., by mutation or posttranslational modification, or by variation in solvent conditions such as temperature, pH, or salt), the resulting change in T _c can be used to predict the change in γ and vice versa. We also report initial results showing that disparity in intermolecular interactions drives multiphase coexistence. These findings provide much needed guidance for understanding how biomolecular condensates mediate cellular functions.     

Dynamics and Composition of Small Heat Shock Protein Condensates and Aggregates

Small heat shock proteins (sHSPs) are essential ATP-independent chaperones that protect the cellular proteome. These proteins assemble into polydisperse oligomeric structures, the composition of which dramatically affects their chaperone activity. The biomolecular consequences of variations in sHSP ratios, especially inside living cells, remain elusive. Here, we study the consequences of altering the relative expression levels of HspB2 and HspB3 in HEK293T cells. These chaperones are partners in a hetero-oligomeric complex, and genetic mutations that abolish their mutual interaction are associated with myopathic disorders.HspB2 displays three distinct phenotypes when co-expressed with HspB3 at varying ratios. Expression of HspB2 alone leads to formation of liquid nuclear condensates, while shifting the stoichiometry towards HspB3 resulted in the formation of large solid-like aggregates. Only cells co-expressing HspB2 with a limited amount of HspB3 formed fully soluble complexes that were distributed homogeneously throughout the nucleus. Strikingly, both condensates and aggregates were reversible, as shifting the HspB2:HspB3 balance in situ resulted in dissolution of these structures.To uncover the molecular composition of HspB2 condensates and aggregates, we used APEX-mediated proximity labelling. Most proteins interact transiently with the condensates and were neither enriched nor depleted in these cells. In contrast, we found that HspB2:HspB3 aggregates sequestered several disordered proteins and autophagy factors, suggesting that the cell is actively attempting to clear these aggregates. This study presents a striking example of how changes in the relative expression levels of interacting proteins affects their phase behavior. Our approach could be applied to study the role of protein stoichiometry and the influence of client binding on phase behavior in other biomolecular condensates and aggregates.     

Structural biology of RNA-binding proteins in the context of phase separation: What NMR and EPR can bring?

Liquid–liquid phase separation of RNA-binding proteins underlies the formation of membraneless organelles, whose composition is dynamic and whose existence may be transient. These organelles are involved in regulation of RNA processing and translation and, if they behave abnormally, in pathologies. Because disorder phenomena are essential in their formation and dynamics, established methodology is insufficient for characterizing their structure. In this review, we consider the current and potential contribution of NMR and EPR spectroscopy to the understanding of structure and dynamics of phase-separating RNA-binding proteins in, both, their dispersed and condensed state in vitro. We discuss which experiments are applicable under what conditions and which information can be obtained from them. Because for these phenomena, the accessible information depends crucially on metastable phase equilibria, we also consider aspects of sample preparation for NMR and EPR experiments.     

Phase Separation in Biology and Disease; Current Perspectives and Open Questions

In the past almost 15 years, we witnessed the birth of a new scientific field focused on the existence, formation, biological functions, and disease associations of membraneless bodies in cells, now referred to as biomolecular condensates. Pioneering studies from several laboratories [reviewed in1, 2, 3] supported a model wherein biomolecular condensates associated with diverse biological processes form through the process of phase separation. These and other findings that followed have revolutionized our understanding of how biomolecules are organized in space and time within cells to perform myriad biological functions, including cell fate determination, signal transduction, endocytosis, regulation of gene expression and protein translation, and regulation of RNA metabolism. Further, condensates formed through aberrant phase transitions have been associated with numerous human diseases, prominently including neurodegeneration and cancer. While in some cases, rigorous evidence supports links between formation of biomolecular condensates through phase separation and biological functions, in many others such links are less robustly supported, which has led to rightful scrutiny of the generality of the roles of phase separation in biology and disease.4, 5, 6, 7 During a week-long workshop in March 2022 at the Telluride Science Research Center (TSRC) in Telluride, Colorado, ～25 scientists addressed key questions surrounding the biomolecular condensates field. Herein, we present insights gained through these discussions, addressing topics including, roles of condensates in diverse biological processes and systems, and normal and disease cell states, their applications to synthetic biology, and the potential for therapeutically targeting biomolecular condensates.     

Liquid-liquid Phase Separation in Viral Function

An emerging set of results suggests that liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) is the basis for the formation of membrane-less compartments in cells. Evidence is now mounting that various types of virus-induced membrane-less compartments and organelles are also assembled via LLPS. Specifically, viruses appear to use intracellular phase transitions to form subcellular microenvironments known as viral factories, inclusion bodies, or viroplasms. These compartments - collectively referred to as viral biomolecular condensates - can be used to concentrate replicase proteins, viral genomes, and host proteins that are required for virus replication. They can also be used to subvert or avoid the intracellular immune response. This review examines how certain DNA or RNA viruses drive the formation of viral condensates, the possible biological functions of those condensates, and the biophysical and biochemical basis for their assembly.     

ATP regulates RNA‐driven cold inducible RNA binding protein phase separation

Intrinsically disordered proteins and proteins containing intrinsically disordered regions are highly abundant in the proteome of eukaryotes and are extensively involved in essential biological functions. More recently, their role in the organization of biomolecular condensates has become evident and along with their misregulation in several neurologic disorders. Currently, most studies involving these proteins are carried out in vitro and using purified proteins. Given that in cells, condensate‐forming proteins are exposed to high, millimolar concentrations of cellular metabolites, we aimed to reveal the interactions of cellular metabolites and a representative condensate‐forming protein. Here, using the arginine–glycine/arginine–glycine–glycine (RG/RGG)‐rich cold inducible RNA binding protein (CIRBP) as paradigm, we studied binding of the cellular metabolome to CIRBP. We found that most of the highly abundant cellular metabolites, except nucleotides, do not directly bind to CIRBP. ATP, ADP, and AMP as well as NAD⁺, NADH, NADP⁺, and NADPH directly interact with CIRBP, involving both the folded RNA‐recognition motif and the disordered RG/RGG region. ATP binding inhibited RNA‐driven phase separation of CIRBP. Thus, it might be beneficial to include cellular metabolites in in vitro liquid–liquid phase separation studies of RG/RGG and other condensate‐forming proteins in order to better mimic the cellular environment in the future.     

Who's In and Who's Out—Compositional Control of Biomolecular Condensates

Biomolecular condensates are two- and three-dimensional compartments in eukaryotic cells that concentrate specific collections of molecules without an encapsulating membrane. Many condensates behave as dynamic liquids and appear to form through liquid–liquid phase separation driven by weak, multivalent interactions between macromolecules. In this review, we discuss current models and data regarding the control of condensate composition, and we describe our current understanding of the composition of representative condensates including PML nuclear bodies, P-bodies, stress granules, the nucleolus, and two-dimensional membrane localized LAT and nephrin clusters. Specific interactions, such as interactions between modular binding domains, weaker interactions between intrinsically disorder regions and nucleic acid base pairing, and nonspecific interactions, such as electrostatic interactions and hydrophobic interactions, influence condensate composition. Understanding how specific condensate composition is determined is essential to understanding condensates as biochemical entities and ultimately discerning their cellular and organismic functions.