New paradigms for advanced prostate cancer

In men with metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer, androgen blockade produces dramatic and rapid declines in prostate-specific antigen (PSA), bone pain, and urinary tract obstruction. Nevertheless, there have been limited options with at best palliative results for patients who progress despite a castrate testosterone level. This paradigm changed in 2004 with the publication of 2 randomized clinical trials that demonstrated a 20% to 24% survival benefit for docetaxel-based therapy when compared to mitoxantrone and prednisone, data that supported US Food and Drug Administration approval of docetaxel-based therapy for the treatment of metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer. This article reviews the preliminary data and the timing and sequencing implications of ongoing clinical trials. Studies are evaluating the combination of docetaxel with agents that target bone, tumor vasculature, and the vitamin D receptor as well as second-line agents, such as satraplatin. The role of immune therapy is also evolving, and further studies will define the optimal timing of chemotherapy with immune therapy.     

Androgen deprivation and other treatments for advanced prostate cancer

Among the issues discussed at this year's meeting on prostate cancer in Vail, Colorado, were several that specifically relate to the patient with advanced disease. Dr. E. David Crawford addressed the issue of the timing of hormone therapy, specifically reviewing several important trials that give a glimpse at the potential outcome of aggressive treatment in stage D1.5. The efficacy of antiandrogens, flutamide, bicalutamide, and nilutamide, when combined with chemical or surgical castration, was reviewed. Dr. Arturo Mendoza-Valdes reviewed the rationale behind intermittent (versus continuous) total androgen blockade, especially as related to quality of life. Dr. Paul Miller gave an update on the role of bisphosphonates as adjuvant therapy for prostate cancer. Also discussed was an important new agent for androgen deprivation, Abarelix, a sustained-release GnRH antagonist with low histamine-releasing potential which avoids testosterone and other hormone surge and flare.     

Immunotherapy for superficial bladder cancer

The treatment of superficial bladder cancer requires adjuvant therapies besides transurethral resection because of a high recurrence rate after this standard treatment alone. Current adjuvant therapies involve intravesical chemotherapy for patients at low and intermediate risk for recurrence and progression, and intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin for patients at intermediate and high risk. However, these adjuvant therapies fail in a significant number of patients, dictating the need for new and improved adjuvant treatment modalities for superficial bladder cancer. Immunotherapy aiming at the modulation of the immune system of the patient is a promising alternative adjuvant. This review discusses the current status of the clinical development of various immunotherapy approaches for superficial bladder cancer, including passive immunotherapy, immune stimulants, immunogene therapy and cancer vaccination.     

Novel small molecule guanidine Sigma1 inhibitors for advanced prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy and the leading cause of cancer related death in men. First line therapy for disseminated disease relies on androgen deprivation, leveraging the addiction of these tumors on androgens for both growth and survival. Treatment typically involves antagonizing the androgen receptor (AR) or blocking the synthesis of androgens. Recurrence is common and within 2–3 years patients develop castration resistant tumors that become unresponsive to AR-axis targeted therapies. In order to provide a more effective treatment, we are utilizing an approach that targets a key scaffolding protein, Sigma1 (also known as sigma-1 receptor), a unique 26-kilodalton integral membrane protein that is critical in stabilizing the AR. Herein we report on a new series of Sigma1 compounds for lead optimization derived from a hybrid pharmacophore approach.     

Immunotherapy for head and neck cancer

Head and neck cancer represents a challenging disease. Despite recent treatment advances, which have improved functional outcomes, the long-term survival of head and neck cancer patients has remained unchanged for the past 25 years. One of the goals of adjuvant cancer therapy is to eradicate local regional microscopic and micrometastatic disease with minimal toxicity to surrounding normal cells. In this respect, antigen-specific immunotherapy is an attractive therapeutic approach. With the advances in molecular genetics and fundamental immunology, antigen-specific immunotherapy is being actively explored using DNA, bacterial vector, viral vector, peptide, protein, dendritic cell, and tumor-cell based vaccines. Early phase clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and feasibility of these novel therapies and the emphasis is now shifting towards the development of strategies, which can increase the potency of these vaccines. As the field of immunotherapy matures and as our understanding of the complex interaction between tumor and host develops, we get closer to realizing the potential of immunotherapy as an adjunctive method to control head and neck cancer and improve long-term survival in this patient population.     

Targeted inhibition of hedgehog signaling by cyclopamine prodrugs for advanced prostate cancer

A promising agent for use in prostate cancer therapy is the Hedgehog (Hh) signaling pathway inhibitor, cyclopamine. This compound, however, has the potential for causing serious side effects in non-tumor tissues. To minimize these bystander toxicities, we have designed and synthesized two novel peptide-cyclopamine conjugates as prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-activated prodrugs for use against prostate cancer. These prodrugs were composed of cyclopamine coupled to one of two peptides (either HSSKLQ or SSKYQ) that can be selectively cleaved by PSA, converting the mature prodrug into an active Hedgehog inhibitor within the malignant cells. Of the two prodrugs, Mu-SSKYQ-Cyclopamine was rapidly hydrolyzed, with a half-life of 3.2h, upon incubation with the PSA enzyme. Thus, modulating cyclopamine at the secondary amine with PSA-cleavable peptides is a promising strategy for developing prodrugs to target prostate cancer.     

Comparison of pre-treatment and in-vivo dosimetry for advanced radiotherapy of prostate cancer

BackgroundThe usage of advanced radiotherapy techniques requires validation of a previously calculated dose with the precise delivery with a linear accelerator. This study aimed to review and evaluate new verification methods of dose distribution. Moreover, our purpose was to define an internal protocol of acceptance for in-vivo measurements of dose distribution.Materials and methodsThis study included 43 treatment plans of prostate cancer calculated using the Monte Carlo algorithm. All plans were delivered using the Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) technique of advanced radiotherapy by the linear accelerator Elekta VersaHD. The dose distribution was verified using: MatriXX, iViewDose, and in-vivo measurements. The verification also included recalculation of fluence maps of quality assurance plans in another independent algorithm.ResultsThe acceptance criterion of 95% points of dose in agreement was found for pre-treatment verification using MatriXX; the average γ value was 99.09 ± 0.93 (SD) and 99.64 ± 0.35 (SD) for recalculation in the Collapse Cone algorithm. Moreover, using the second algorithm in the verification process showed a positive correlation ρ = 0.58, p < 0.001. However, verification using iViewDose in a phantom and in-vivo did not meet this γ-pass rate.ConclusionsEvaluation of gamma values for in-vivo measurements utilizing iViewDose software was helpful to establish an internal dosimetry protocol for prostate cancer treatments. We assumed value at a minimum of 50% points of the dose in agreement with the 3%/3 mm criterion as an acceptable compliance level. The recalculated dose distribution of QA plans in regard to the Collapse Cone algorithm in the other treatment planning system can be used as a pre-treatment verification method used by a medical physicist in their daily work. The effectiveness of use in iViewDose software, as a pre-treatment tool, is still debatable, unlike the MatriXX device.     

New approaches to the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

Several presentations by attendees of the 11th International Prostate Cancer Update addressed recent advances in prostate cancer treatment. A study that examined whether a relationship exists between neuroendocrine (NE) cell differentiation and hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC) concluded that the appearance of NE cells in prostatic carcinoma is an important phenomenon in the development of HRPC. Exisuland, a selective apoptotic antineoplastic drug, was compared to placebo in a recent study and was found to significantly inhibit the increase of prostate-specific antigen in patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy. A new dosing regimen for flutamide (500 mg daily) was found to have no significant differences from the currently recommended dose (250 mg every 8 hours); the new, single daily dose could meet with greater compliance and would reduce drug cost by 30%. The antiproliferative effect of vitamin D on prostatic carcinoma cells was discussed, along with the possible role of vitamin D supplementation during prostate cancer treatment. Finally, a presentation on hospice care acknowledged that referral for such care is unfortunately at times delayed by physicians, patients, and patients' families, leaving insufficient time for all the benefits of that stage of care to be realized.     

Calcium cytotoxicity sensitizes prostate cancer cells to standard-of-care treatments for locally advanced tumors

Therapy resistance is a major roadblock in oncology. Exacerbation of molecular dysfunctions typical of cancer cells have proven effective in twisting oncogenic mechanisms to lethal conditions, thus offering new therapeutic avenues for cancer treatment. Here, we demonstrate that selective agonists of Transient Receptor Potential cation channel subfamily M member 8 (TRPM8), a cation channel characteristic of the prostate epithelium frequently overexpressed in advanced stage III/IV prostate cancers (PCa), sensitize therapy refractory models of PCa to radio, chemo or hormonal treatment. Overall, our study demonstrates that pharmacological-induced Ca²⁺ cytotoxicity is an actionable strategy to sensitize cancer cells to standard therapies.Subject terms: Targeted therapies, Prostate cancer     

Androgen deprivation therapy in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer

This article reviews the issues and controversies relevant to the treatment of advanced prostate cancer with androgen deprivation therapy. Initially, diethylstilbestrol was used for achieving androgen deprivation, but was replaced by luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH). Adverse events associated with LHRH agonists include the flare phenomenon, hot flashes, loss of libido, erectile dysfunction, depression, muscle wasting, anemia, and osteoporosis. Intermittent therapy has been advocated to reduce morbidity of treatment. The addition of an antiandrogen provides maximum androgen blockade. There remains controversy regarding the timing of the addition of an antiandrogen. Secondary hormonal therapies include antiandrogens, adrenal androgen inhibitors, and estrogens.     

Hormonal therapy combined with radiotherapy in locally advanced prostate cancer

At present radiation therapy and radical prostatectomy are considered to be the treatment of choice for clinical T1-T2 prostate cancer. In a more advanced stage of the disease (T3) 10-year overall survival is observed in approximately 40% of patients treated with conventional radiotherapy. So far only a few methods for improving the efficacy of radiotherapy have been introduced. One of them is a three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy with 3 dimensional treatment planning. These novel methods make it possible to escalate the dose to the target and protect healthy tissue at the same time. The optimal volume of irradiation, total dose, fraction dose, techniques of radiotherapy, and the end points used during the follow-up are open to debate. In recent years a few clinical trials involving hormonal therapy and radiotherapy have been carried out. The most important of these are: RTOG 8307, RTOG 8610, RTOG 9202, and EORTC 22863.In the RTOG 8307 trial the comparison of outcomes of a combined treatment with a matched-control group of patients treated by radiotherapy alone has shown that adding hormonal therapy to radiotherapy resulted in a better outcome. Another trials RTOG 8531 and RTOG 8610 produced benefit due to the implementation of hormonal therapy in radiotherapy. The EORTC trial No. 22863 showed improvement in the 5-year overall survival when hormonal therapy after the completion of radiotherapy was continued for 3 years in the investigational arm. The RTOG 9202 study indicated benefit obtained from 2 years of adjuvant hormonal therapy.The results of these trials have had a substantial impact on the management of locally advanced prostate cancer, but there are still questions that have to be answered. There is no doubt that hormonal therapy is an important component of the management of locally advanced prostate cancer. Still the optimal combination of drugs and the timing of such treatment remains controversial. Considering the potential side effects of a combined treatment on the quality of life of patients and care costs, additional properly designed randomised trials are needed to identify the subgroup of patients who will obtain the greatest benefit. Currently, it can be concluded that in the group of patients with a high risk of relapse by adding hormonal therapy to radiotherapy the outcome of treatment in patients with prostate cancer has improved.     

Adiponectin as a potential marker of prostate cancer progression: studies in organ-confined and locally advanced prostate cancer

Serum levels of adiponectin were measured in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer of pT2 and pT3 stage. Adiponectin ELISA assay, immunohistochemistry, and selected metabolic and biochemical parameters measurement was performed in 25 patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and 43 with prostate cancer (17 patients with organ-confined and 26 patients with locally advanced disease). Serum adiponectin levels did not differ between prostate benign hyperplasia and cancer clinical stage T2, but was significantly higher in pT3 relative to pT2 group (14.51+/-4.92 vs. 21.41+/-8.12, P = 0.003). Tissue immunohistochemistry showed enhanced staining in neoplastic prostate glands and intraepithelial neoplasia relative to benign prostatic hyperplasia without distinction between disease grade and stage. Serum adiponectin levels are higher in locally advanced relative to organ-confined prostate cancer and may thus serve as an auxiliary marker providing further improvement for discrimination between pT2 and pT3 stages.     

Biomarkers for prostate cancer

The detection of prostate cancer using a blood test has by many standards changed the face of the disease. Despite this tremendous success, there are limitations attributed to the use of prostate specific antigen (PSA) as a means to screen and detect prostate cancer. PSA, as its name implies, is not specific for prostate cancer and as such is often found elevated in other prostatic diseases/symptoms associated with the aging male. Clearly, more specific marker(s) that could identify which individuals actually have prostate cancer and differentiate them from those without the disease would be of tremendous value. The search for more accurate and clinically useful biomarkers of prostate cancer has been extensive. This has focused on individual markers, as well as groups of markers. Included among these are PSA isoforms, pathological indicators and stains, nucleic acids and others. This article highlights the discovery of PSA as a first blood‐based biomarker for prostate cancer detection, as well as other molecular biomarkers and their potential application in detection of the disease. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 3–9, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.