Anti-lamprey retinal antibodies: immunohistochemistry on the retinas of several species of vertebrates

Summary Two monoclonal antibodies, H16 and B11, which were raised against lamprey retinal homogenate, were found to react with both short and long photoreceptor outer segments. On Western blotting of the retinal homogenate, both antibodies recognized a 40000 Da and a 80000 Da band. H16 antibody stained rod outer segments of all examined vertebrates, all cone outer segments of the turtle and chicken, and certain cone outer segments of the macaque. B11 antibody stained sub-mammalian rod outer segments and some mammalian cone outer segments, leaving all mammalian rod outer segments unstained. The epitope recognized by H16 antibody is considered to be located in a conserved or commonly inherited element of an outer segment-bound molecule, presumably rhodopsin. B11 antibody, on the other hand, seems to recognize a reactive group which has failed to be inherited by mammalian rod cells; why it recognizes all cone outer segments in the turtle and chicken and only a part of them in the cow, cat, and macaque, meanwhile ignoring all of them in the frog and fish, is subject to further study.A portion of this work is contained in a dissertation submitted by the first author, M.Y., in application for the Ph.D. degree at Yamagata University School of Medicine.     

Cone visual pigments

Cone visual pigments are visual opsins that are present in vertebrate cone photoreceptor cells and act as photoreceptor molecules responsible for photopic vision. Like the rod visual pigment rhodopsin, which is responsible for scotopic vision, cone visual pigments contain the chromophore 11-cis-retinal, which undergoes cis–trans isomerization resulting in the induction of conformational changes of the protein moiety to form a G protein-activating state. There are multiple types of cone visual pigments with different absorption maxima, which are the molecular basis of color discrimination in animals. Cone visual pigments form a phylogenetic sister group with non-visual opsin groups such as pinopsin, VA opsin, parapinopsin and parietopsin groups. Cone visual pigments diverged into four groups with different absorption maxima, and the rhodopsin group diverged from one of the four groups of cone visual pigments. The photochemical behavior of cone visual pigments is similar to that of pinopsin but considerably different from those of other non-visual opsins. G protein activation efficiency of cone visual pigments is also comparable to that of pinopsin but higher than that of the other non-visual opsins. Recent measurements with sufficient time-resolution demonstrated that G protein activation efficiency of cone visual pigments is lower than that of rhodopsin, which is one of the molecular bases for the lower amplification of cones compared to rods. In this review, the uniqueness of cone visual pigments is shown by comparison of their molecular properties with those of non-visual opsins and rhodopsin. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Retinal Proteins — You can teach an old dog new tricks.     

A visual pigment from chicken that resembles rhodopsin: amino acid sequence, gene structure, and functional expression.

The amino acid sequence of a rhodopsin-like visual pigment from chickens has been determined by isolating and sequencing its gene. The predicted sequence is between 70% and 80% identical to bovine, human, and chicken rhodopsins and between 40% and 50% identical to human blue, green, and red cone pigments, the chicken red cone pigment, and cavefish long-wave cone pigments. The encoded pigment, produced by transfection of cDNA into cultured cells, absorbs maximally at 495 nm as determined from photobleaching difference spectra and reacts at 20 degrees C with 50 mM hydroxylamine with a half-time of 16 min. These properties, together with a high pI predicted from the amino acid sequence, suggest that this cloned gene encodes the chicken green pigment previously identified by biochemical and spectroscopic studies. This sequence defines a new branch of the visual pigment gene family.     

Comparative studies on the late bleaching processes of four kinds of cone visual pigments and rod visual pigment

Visual pigments in rod and cone photoreceptor cells of vertebrate retinas are highly diversified photoreceptive proteins that consist of a protein moiety opsin and a light-absorbing chromophore 11-cis-retinal. There are four types of cone visual pigments and a single type of rod visual pigment. The reaction process of the rod visual pigment, rhodopsin, has been extensively investigated, whereas there have been few studies of cone visual pigments. Here we comprehensively investigated the reaction processes of cone visual pigments on a time scale of milliseconds to minutes, using flash photolysis equipment optimized for cone visual pigment photochemistry. We used chicken violet (L-group), chicken blue (M1-group), chicken green (M2-group), and monkey green (L-group) visual pigments as representatives of the respective groups of the phylogenetic tree of cone pigments. The S, M1, and M2 pigments showed the formation of a pH-dependent mixture of meta intermediates, similar to that formed from rhodopsin. Although monkey green (L-group) also formed a mixture of meta intermediates, pH dependency of meta intermediates was not observed. However, meta intermediates of monkey green became pH dependent when the chloride ion bound to the monkey green was replaced with a nitrate ion. These results strongly suggest that rhodopsin and S, M1, and M2 cone visual pigments share a molecular mechanism for activation, whereas the L-group pigment may have a special reaction mechanism involving the chloride-binding site.     

Difference in molecular structure of rod and cone visual pigments studied by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy

To investigate the local structure that causes the differences in molecular properties between rod and cone visual pigments, we have measured the difference infrared spectra between chicken green and its photoproduct at 77 K and compared them with those from bovine and chicken rhodopsins. In contrast to the similarity of the vibrational bands of the chromophore, those of the protein part were notably different between chicken green and the rhodopsins. Like the rhodopsins, chicken green has an aspartic acid at position 83 (D83) but exhibited no signals due to the protonated carboxyl of D83 in the C=O stretching region, suggesting that the molecular contact between D83 and G120 through water molecule evidenced in bovine rhodopsin is absent in chicken green. A pair of positive and negative bands due to the peptide backbone (amide I) was prominent in chicken green, while the rhodopsins exhibited only small bands in this region. Furthermore, chicken green exhibited characteristic paired bands around 1480 cm(-1), which were identified as the imide bands of P189 using site-directed mutagenesis. P189, situated in the putative second extracellular loop, is conserved in all the known cone visual pigments but not in rhodopsins. Thus, some region of the second extracellular loop including P189 is situated near the chromophore and changes its environment upon formation of the batho-intermediate. The results noted above indicate that differences in the protein parts between chicken green and the rhodopsins alter the changes seen in the protein upon photoisomerization of the chromophore. Some of these changes appear to be the pathway from the chromophore to cytoplasmic surface of the pigment and thus could affect the activation process of transducin.     

Amino acid residues responsible for the meta-III decay rates in rod and cone visual pigments

Vertebrate retinas have two types of photoreceptor cells, rods and cones, which contain visual pigments with different molecular properties. These pigments diverged from a common ancestor, and their difference in molecular properties originates from the difference in their amino acid residues. We previously reported that the difference in decay times of G protein-activating meta-II intermediates between the chicken rhodopsin and green-sensitive cone (chicken green) pigments is about 50 times. This difference only originates from the differences of two residues at positions 122 and 189 (Kuwayama, S., Imai, H., Hirano, T., Terakita, A., and Shichida, Y. (2002) Biochemistry 41, 15245-15252). Here we show that the meta-III intermediates exhibit about 700 times difference in decay times between the two pigments, and the faster decay in chicken green can be converted to the slower decay in rhodopsin by replacing the residues in chicken green with the corresponding rhodopsin residues. However, the inverse directional conversion did not occur when the two residues in rhodopsin were replaced by those of chicken green. Analysis using chimerical mutants derived from these pigments has demonstrated that amino acid residues responsible for the slow rhodopsin meta-III decay are situated at several positions throughout the C-terminal half of rhodopsin. Considering that rhodopsins evolved from cone pigments, it has been suggested that the molecular properties of rhodopsin have been optimized by mutations at several positions, and the chicken green mutants at two positions could be rhodopsin-like pigments transiently produced in the course of molecular evolution.     

The visual pigment sensitivity hypothesis: further evidence from fishes of varying habitats

Summary Visual pigments were extracted from the retinas of 8 species of marine teleosts and 4 species of elasmobranchs and a comparison was made of the pigment properties from these fishes, some inhabiting surface waters, others from the mesopelagic zone, and a few migrating vertically between these two environments. An association was found between the spectral position of the absorbance curve and the habitat depth or habitat behavior, with the blue-shifted chrysopsins being the pigments of the twilight zone fishes and the rhodopsins with fishes living near the surface. The retina of the swell shark (Cephaloscyllium ventriosum) yielded extracts with two photopigments; one, a rhodopsin at 498 nm; the second, a chrysopsin at 478 nm. This fish has been reported to practice seasonal vertical migrations between the surface and the mesopelagic waters. In addition to the spectral absorbance, several properties of these visual pigments were examined, including the meta-III product of photic bleaching, regeneration with added 11-cis and 9-cis retinals, and the chromophoric photosensitivity. The chrysopsin properties were found to be fundamentally similar to those of typical vertebrate rhodopsins. Correlating the spectral data with the habitat and habitat behavior of our fishes gives us confidence in the idea that the scotopic pigments have evolved as adaptations to those aspects of their color environment that are critical to the survival of the species.     

Molecular cloning and characterization of rhodopsin in a teleost (Plecoglossus altivelis,Osmeridae)

Amplified fragments encoding exon-4 of opsin cDNAs were cloned from the retina of landlocked ayu (Plecoglossus altivelis), and sequenced. On the basis of the sequence homology to previously characterized fish visual pigments, one clone was identified as rod opsin (AYU-Rh), and two clones as green (AYU-G1, -G2), one as red (AYU-R) and two as ultraviolet (AYU-UV1, -UV2) cone opsins. The 335-amino acid sequence deduced from the full-length cDNA of AYU-Rh included residues highly conserved in vertebrate rhodopsins and showed the greatest degree (88%) of similarity with salmon rhodopsin. Southern blotting analysis indicated that ayu possess two rhodopsin genes, one encoding visual rhodopsin (AYU-Rh) and the other non-visual extra-ocular rhodopsin (AYU-ExoRh). RT-PCR experiments revealed that AYU-Rh was expressed in the retina and AYU-ExoRh in the pineal gland. In situ hybridization experiments showed that the mRNA of AYU-Rh was localized only in rod cells not in cone cells. Lake and river type landlocked ayu having different amounts of retinal and 3-hydroxyretinal in their retinas expressed a rhodopsin (AYU-Rh) of identical amino acid sequence.     

Retinopathy in mice induced by disrupted all-trans-retinal clearance

The visual (retinoid) cycle is a fundamental metabolic process in vertebrate retina responsible for production of 11-cis-retinal, the chromophore of rhodopsin and cone pigments. 11-cis-Retinal is bound to opsins, forming visual pigments, and when the resulting visual chromophore 11-cis-retinylidene is photoisomerized to all-trans-retinylidene, all-trans-retinal is released from these receptors. Toxic byproducts of the visual cycle formed from all-trans-retinal often are associated with lipofuscin deposits in the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE), but it is not clear whether aberrant reactions of the visual cycle participate in RPE atrophy, leading to a rapid onset of retinopathy. Here we report that mice lacking both the ATP-binding cassette transporter 4 (Abca4) and enzyme retinol dehydrogenase 8 (Rdh8), proteins critical for all-trans-retinal clearance from photoreceptors, developed severe RPE/photoreceptor dystrophy at an early age. This phenotype includes lipofuscin, drusen, and basal laminar deposits, Bruch's membrane thickening, and choroidal neovascularization. Importantly, the severity of visual dysfunction and retinopathy was exacerbated by light but attenuated by treatment with retinylamine, a visual cycle inhibitor that slows the flow of all-trans-retinal through the visual cycle. These findings provide direct evidence that aberrant production of toxic condensation byproducts of the visual cycle in mice can lead to rapid, progressive retinal degeneration.     

E113 is required for the efficient photoisomerization of the unprotonated chromophore in a UV-absorbing visual pigment

Protonation of the retinal Schiff base chromophore is responsible for the absorption of visible light and is stabilized by the counterion residue E113 in vertebrate visual pigments. However, this residue is also conserved in vertebrate UV-absorbing visual pigments (UV pigments) which have an unprotonated Schiff base chromophore. To elucidate the role played by this residue in the photoisomerization of the unprotonated chromophore in UV pigments, we measured the quantum yield of the E113Q mutant of the mouse UV cone pigment (mouse UV). The quantum yield of the mutant was much lower than that of the wild type, indicating that E113 is required for the efficient photoisomerization of the unprotonated chromophore in mouse UV. Introduction of the E113Q mutation into the chicken violet cone pigment (chicken violet), which has a protonated chromophore, caused deprotonation of the chromophore and a reduction in the quantum yield. On the other hand, the S90C mutation in chicken violet, which deprotonated the chromophore with E113 remaining intact, did not significantly affect the quantum yield. These results suggest that E113 facilitates photoisomerization in both UV-absorbing and visible light-absorbing visual pigments and provide a possible explanation for the complete conservation of E113 among vertebrate UV pigments.     

Why 11-cis-Retinal?

The C₂₀ diterpenoid compound retinal is the chromophore of thevisual pigments the rhodopsins, and the pigments present inHalobacterium halobium, namely, bacteriorhodopsin (proton pump),halorhodopsin (chloride pump), and the sensory rhodopsins (phototaxisreceptor). In all cases, they are bound covalently to the receptorprotein by a protonated Schiff base. However, in rhodopsins,the retinal is the 11-cis isomer, whereas in H. halobium pigmentsit is the all-trans isomer. Why did Nature choose retinal asthe chromophore, and why 11-cis in some cases and all-transin other cases? Also why is the chromophore a protonated Schiffbase? These points are addressed after giving an outline ofthe current status of the various photoreceptor pigments     

Role of noncovalent binding of 11-cis-retinal to opsin in dark adaptation of rod and cone photoreceptors

Regeneration of visual pigments of vertebrate rod and cone photoreceptors occurs by the initial noncovalent binding of 11-cis-retinal to opsin, followed by the formation of a covalent bond between the ligand and the protein. Here, we show that the noncovalent interaction between 11-cis-retinal and opsin affects the rate of dark adaptation. In rods, 11-cis-retinal produces a transient activation of the phototransduction cascade that precedes sensitivity recovery, thus slowing dark adaptation. In cones, 11-cis-retinal immediately deactivates phototransduction. Thus, the initial binding of the same ligand to two very similar G protein receptors, the rod and cone opsins, activates one and deactivates the other, contributing to the remarkable difference in the rates of rod and cone dark adaptation.     

Spectral tuning of deep red cone pigments

Visual pigments are G-protein-coupled receptors that provide a critical interface between organisms and their external environment. Natural selection has generated vertebrate pigments that absorb light from the far-UV (360 nm) to the deep red (630 nm) while using a single chromophore, in either the A1 (11- cis-retinal) or A2 (11- cis-3,4-dehydroretinal) form. The fact that a single chromophore can be manipulated to have an absorption maximum across such an extended spectral region is remarkable. The mechanisms of wavelength regulation remain to be fully revealed, and one of the least well-understood mechanisms is that associated with the deep red pigments. We investigate theoretically the hypothesis that deep red cone pigments select a 6- s- trans conformation of the retinal chromophore ring geometry. This conformation is in contrast to the 6- s- cis ring geometry observed in rhodopsin and, through model chromophore studies, the vast majority of visual pigments. Nomographic spectral analysis of 294 A1 and A2 cone pigment literature absorption maxima indicates that the selection of a 6- s- trans geometry red shifts M/LWS A1 pigments by approximately 1500 cm (-1) ( approximately 50 nm) and A2 pigments by approximately 2700 cm (-1) ( approximately 100 nm). The homology models of seven cone pigments indicate that the deep red cone pigments select 6- s- trans chromophore conformations primarily via electrostatic steering. Our results reveal that the generation of a 6- s- trans conformation not only achieves a significant red shift but also provides enhanced stability of the chromophore within the deep red cone pigment binding sites.     

The Action of 11-cis-Retinol on Cone Opsins and Intact Cone Photoreceptors

11-cis-Retinol has previously been shown in physiological experiments to promote dark adaptation and recovery of photoresponsiveness of bleached salamander red cones but not of bleached salamander red rods. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the direct interaction of 11-cis-retinol with expressed human and salamander cone opsins, and to determine by microspectrophotometry pigment formation in isolated salamander photoreceptors. We show here in a cell-free system using incorporation of radioactive guanosine 5′-3-O-(thio)triphosphate into transducin as an index of activity, that 11-cis-retinol inactivates expressed salamander cone opsins, acting an inverse agonist. Similar results were obtained with expressed human red and green opsins. 11-cis-Retinol had no significant effect on the activity of human blue cone opsin. In contrast, 11-cis-retinol activates the expressed salamander and human red rod opsins, acting as an agonist. Using microspectrophotometry of salamander cone photoreceptors before and after bleaching and following subsequent treatment with 11-cis-retinol, we show that 11-cis-retinol promotes pigment formation. Pigment was not formed in salamander red rods or green rods (containing the same opsin as blue cones) treated under the same conditions. These results demonstrate that 11-cis-retinol is not a useful substrate for rod photoreceptors although it is for cone photoreceptors. These data support the premise that rods and cones have mechanisms for handling retinoids and regenerating visual pigment that are specific to photoreceptor type. These mechanisms are critical to providing regenerated pigments in a time scale required for the function of these two types of photoreceptors.11-cis-Retinol is the precursor to 11-cis-retinal, the 11-cis-aldehyde form of vitamin A and the chromophore that combines covalently with rod and cone opsin proteins to form visual pigments. 11-cis-Retinal is consumed during visual signaling, and its continual synthesis is required. Photon absorption by the visual pigments causes the isomerization of its chromophore to the all-trans configuration. This initiates two processes critical for vision: activation of the photoreceptor cell and the eventual recovery of the original photosensitivity of the cells, requiring regeneration of the visual pigments. As cones are used for bright light vision, these two processes must work more rapidly in cones than in rods and thus cones have a higher requirement of 11-cis-retinoids as suggested by Rushton (1, 2).Photoreceptor activation begins with photoisomerization of the chromophore within the visual pigment. This results in a subsequent conformational change of the protein part of the visual pigment that is able to activate its G protein transducin, which in turn activates a PDE that lowers the concentration of cGMP and closes cGMP-gated ion channels. These steps comprise the visual signal transduction cascade (see Ref. 3 for review).The visual cycle involves regeneration of the visual pigment, which ultimately deactivates the protein and accomplishes the recovery of the photosensitivity of the photoreceptor cell. Classically, this process involves both the photoreceptor cell and the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE).⁴ After photoisomerization of the chromophore and formation of the active visual pigment, all-trans-retinal is released from the opsin and reduced to all-trans-retinol, which is then transported to the RPE where it is isomerized to 11-cis-retinol through a number of steps. In the RPE, 11-cis-retinol is oxidized to the aldehyde form, which is transported back to the photoreceptor cell and can be directly used by all of the opsins to regenerate an inactive pigment ready for photoactivation. The details of this model have been extensively reviewed (4, 5). Alternatively, recent work suggests that cones have an additional source of 11-cis-retinoids from Müller cells (6–8). Like the RPE cells, Müller cells have been shown to be able to convert all-trans-retinol to 11-cis-retinol (6). Unlike in the RPE cells, 11-cis-retinol is not oxidized to 11-cis-retinal in Müller cells.Jones et al. (9) demonstrated that administration of 11-cis-retinol to bleached salamander red cones could restore photosensitivity. A logical conclusion was that red cones were able to oxidize 11-cis-retinol to the aldehyde and regenerate visual pigments although noncovalent binding of 11-cis-retinol to red cone opsins generating a light-sensitive complex could not be excluded. On the other hand, 11-cis-retinol does not restore photosensitivity to bleached salamander rod cells but appears to directly activate the cells (9, 10). The data suggested that the rods were not able to oxidize 11-cis-retinol, but that the retinol itself could activate the signal transduction cascade, and indeed we recently demonstrated that 11-cis-retinol acts as an agonist to expressed bovine rod opsin (11). Our aim here was to study the action of 11-cis-retinol on cone opsins and cone photoreceptor cells to determine the efficacy of an alternate visual cycle for cones.The photoreceptor cells used in this study are from tiger salamander, and the expressed opsins used for biochemical experiments are those from salamander and human. Photoreceptor cells are generally identified by cell morphology and the type of opsin it contains that can be further complicated by the findings that some cone cells have multiple opsins (12, 13). Recently genetic analysis has determined that opsins fall into five classes (reviewed in Refs. 14 and 15). We have studied opsins falling into four of these classes and use common color-derived names for the opsins and photoreceptor cells. The classic rod cells used for scotopic vision contain rhodopsin, the visual pigment for the rod opsin (RH1 opsin) and appeared red and thus have been designated as red rods. Some species such as salamanders have an additional rod cell whose photosensitivity is blue-shifted from that of the red rod and thus designated as green rods. In the tiger salamander, the green rods contain the identical opsin (SWS2 opsin) found in blue cones (16). The human blue cones contain an opsin from a different class (SWS1 opsin), which is homologous to the salamander UV cone opsin. The human red and green and salamander red cone opsins all belong to the same class of opsins (M/LWS opsins). Absorption properties of visual pigments are further modulated in some animals including the tiger salamander by use of 11-cis-retinal with an additional double bond (3,4-dehydro or A2 11-cis-retinal) resulting in red-shifted absorbance from pigments containing 11-cis-retinal (A1 11-cis-retinal).We show here that 11-cis-retinol is not an agonist to cone opsins and does not itself generate a light-sensitive opsin. We further show using microspectrophotometry that both red and blue salamander cone cells regenerate visual pigments from 11-cis-retinol, whereas pigments could not be regenerated with 11-cis-retinol in bleached salamander red and green rods even though the latter contains the same opsin as the salamander blue cone. Thus, rods and cones have mechanisms for handling retinoids and regenerating visual pigment that are specific to photoreceptor type, and these mechanisms are critical to providing regenerated pigments in a time scale required for the function of these two types of photoreceptors.     

Localization of visual pigment antigens to photoreceptor cells with different oil droplets in the chicken retina

Frozen semithin sections and unembedded retinal pieces were investigated by immunocytochemistry using two antibodies produced against visual pigments in our laboratory. One was a polyclonal serum (AO) raised against bovine rhodopsin, while the other one was a monoclonal antibody (COS-1) produced against an epitope present in a cone visual pigment. AO stained, as expected, rod outer segments; in addition it also recognized a single cone characterized by a deep yellow oil droplet as well as another single cone with a yellowish green oil droplet. In contrast, COS-1 labelled both members of the double cones; the principal member having a yellowish-green oil droplet and the accessory member. COS-1 also stained a single cone type exhibiting a large red oil droplet.     

Isomerization of all-trans-retinol to cis-retinols in bovine retinal pigment epithelial cells: dependence on the specificity of retinoid-binding proteins

In the retinal rod and cone photoreceptors, light photoactivates rhodopsin or cone visual pigments by converting 11-cis-retinal to all-trans-retinal, the process that ultimately results in phototransduction and visual sensation. The production of 11-cis-retinal in adjacent retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells is a fundamental process that allows regeneration of the vertebrate visual system. Here, we present evidence that all-trans-retinol is unstable in the presence of H(+) and rearranges to anhydroretinol through a carbocation intermediate, which can be trapped by alcohols to form retro-retinyl ethers. This ability of all-trans-retinol to form a carbocation could be relevant for isomerization. The calculated activation energy of isomerization of all-trans-retinyl carbocation to the 11-cis-isomer was only approximately 18 kcal/mol, as compared to approximately 36 kcal/mol for all-trans-retinol. This activation energy is similar to approximately 17 kcal/mol obtained experimentally for the isomerization reaction in RPE microsomes. Mass spectrometric (MS) analysis of isotopically labeled retinoids showed that isomerization proceeds via alkyl cleavage mechanism, but the product of isomerization depended on the specificity of the retinoid-binding protein(s) as evidenced by the production of 13-cis-retinol in the presence of cellular retinoid-binding protein (CRBP). To test the influence of an electron-withdrawing group on the polyene chain, which would inhibit carbocation formation, 11-fluoro-all-trans-retinol was used in the isomerization assay and was shown to be inactive. Together, these results strengthen the idea that the isomerization reaction is driven by mass action and may occur via carbocation intermediate.     

Rod Visual Pigment Optimizes Active State to Achieve Efficient G Protein Activation as Compared with Cone Visual Pigments

Most vertebrate retinas contain two types of photoreceptor cells, rods and cones, which show different photoresponses to mediate scotopic and photopic vision, respectively. These cells contain different types of visual pigments, rhodopsin and cone visual pigments, respectively, but little is known about the molecular properties of cone visual pigments under physiological conditions, making it difficult to link the molecular properties of rhodopsin and cone visual pigments with the differences in photoresponse between rods and cones. Here we prepared bovine and mouse rhodopsin (bvRh and mRh) and chicken and mouse green-sensitive cone visual pigments (cG and mG) embedded in nanodiscs and applied time-resolved fluorescence spectroscopy to compare their G_t activation efficiencies. Rhodopsin exhibited greater G_t activation efficiencies than cone visual pigments. Especially, the G_t activation efficiency of mRh was about 2.5-fold greater than that of mG at 37 °C, which is consistent with our previous electrophysiological data of knock-in mice. Although the active state (Meta-II) was in equilibrium with inactive states (Meta-I and Meta-III), quantitative determination of Meta-II in the equilibrium showed that the G_t activation efficiency per Meta-II of bvRh was also greater than those of cG and mG. These results indicated that efficient G_t activation by rhodopsin, resulting from an optimized active state of rhodopsin, is one of the causes of the high amplification efficiency of rods.     

Primary structure of a visual pigment in bullfrog green rods

In frog retina there are special rod photoreceptor cells ('green rods') with physiological properties similar to those of typical vertebrate rods ('red rods'). A cDNA fragment encoding the putative green rod visual pigment was isolated from a retinal cDNA library of the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. Its deduced amino acid sequence has more than 65% identity with those of blue-sensitive cone pigments such as chicken blue and goldfish blue. Antisera raised against its C-terminal amino acid sequence recognized green rods. It is concluded that bullfrog green rods contain a visual pigment which is closely related to the blue-sensitive cone pigments of other non-mammalian vertebrates.     

The cone photoreceptors and visual pigments of chameleons

Visual pigments, oil droplets and photoreceptor types in the retinas of four species of true chameleons have been examined by microspectrophotometry. The species occupy different photic environments: two species of Chamaeleo are from Madagascar and two species of Furcifer are from Africa and the Arabian Peninsula. In addition to double cones, four spectrally distinct classes of single cone were identified. No rod photoreceptors were observed. The visual pigments appear to be mixtures of rhodopsins and porphyropsins. Double cones contained a pale oil droplet in the principle member and both outer segments contained a long-wave-sensitive visual pigment with a spectral maximum between about 555 nm and 610 nm, depending on the rhodopsin/porphyropsin mixture. Long-wave-sensitive single cones contained a visual pigment spectrally identical to the double cones, but combined with a yellow oil droplet. The other three classes of single cone contained visual pigments with maxima at about 480–505, 440–450 and 375–385 nm, combined with yellow, clear and transparent oil droplets respectively. The latter two classes were sparsely distributed. The transmission of the lens and cornea of C. dilepis was measured and found to be transparent throughout the visible and near ultraviolet, with a cut off at about 350 nm.     

The Green-absorbing Drosophila Rh6 Visual Pigment Contains a Blue-shifting Amino Acid Substitution That Is Conserved in Vertebrates

The molecular mechanisms that regulate invertebrate visual pigment absorption are poorly understood. Through sequence analysis and functional investigation of vertebrate visual pigments, numerous amino acid substitutions important for this adaptive process have been identified. Here we describe a serine/alanine (S/A) substitution in long wavelength-absorbing Drosophila visual pigments that occurs at a site corresponding to Ala-292 in bovine rhodopsin. This S/A substitution accounts for a 10–17-nm absorption shift in visual pigments of this class. Additionally, we demonstrate that substitution of a cysteine at the same site, as occurs in the blue-absorbing Rh5 pigment, accounts for a 4-nm shift. Substitutions at this site are the first spectrally significant amino acid changes to be identified for invertebrate pigments sensitive to visible light and are the first evidence of a conserved tuning mechanism in vertebrate and invertebrate pigments of this class.Organisms use color vision for survival behaviors such as foraging, mating, and predator avoidance (1–3). Color vision in invertebrates ranges from trichromatic systems capable of detecting UV, blue, and green (e.g. bees and flies) to the highly complex mantis shrimps (stomatopods) having 12 spectrally distinct classes of photoreceptor cells (4). Despite the diversity of invertebrate color vision systems and the large collection of naturally occurring visual pigments, important questions remain concerning the molecular mechanisms that regulate color sensitivity.In both vertebrates and invertebrates, the visual pigment rhodopsin consists of a chromophore (e.g. 11-cis retinal) covalently bound to an opsin apoprotein via a protonated Schiff base. Upon light absorption, the chromophore isomerizes from cis to all-trans, inducing conformational changes in the opsin that produce activated metarhodopsin. Specific interactions between the retinal chromophore and residues in the opsin tune the λ_max of the chromophore. Studies have shown that Glu-113 (bovine position) serves as the retinylidene Schiff base counter-ion in vertebrate visual pigments (5–7). Removing the negative charge of the counter-ion from the binding pocket deprotonates the chromophore and yields a UV-absorbing pigment (5–7). Using sequence alignments, phylogenetic analysis, analysis of the bovine rhodopsin crystal structure (PDB² entry 1U19), and functional experiments, a large number of amino acids involved in the spectral tuning of vertebrate visual pigments have been identified (8).In contrast, the counter-ion for invertebrate rhodopsin remains unknown, and only one spectrally relevant residue has been identified: an amino acid substitution in Drosophila pigments responsible for UV versus visible sensitivity (9). Interestingly, this amino acid substitution (Gly-90 in bovine rhodopsin) coincides with a substitution that mediates UV versus blue sensitivity in several bird species (10, 11). This discovery highlights the value of a cross-phyla comparison of visual pigments as a means to identify structural differences that may regulate color vision in invertebrates.In the present study, we identify an amino acid substitution in Drosophila visual pigments that regulates the color sensitivity of blue- and green-absorbing rhodopsins. For these studies, we employed sequence analysis of invertebrate and vertebrate visual pigments and a functional examination of mutant invertebrate opsins. This amino acid substitution red-shifts the λ_max of the Drosophila Rh1 pigment and reciprocally blue-shifts the λ_max of Rh6 pigment. Interestingly, this site also affects the spectral tuning of vertebrate pigments and corresponds to Ala-292 in bovine rhodopsin (8, 12–16).