三种黑曲霉细胞基因组DNA提取方法的比较

采用三种方法提取黑曲霉基因组DNA,比较了各方法的提取时间、DNA纯度和产量,结果表明：二次沉淀法耗时5-6h,但提取的黑曲霉细胞基因组DNA质量好,产量高达130μg／g菌丝体;其次为中性裂解法耗时1—2h,产量约13μg／g菌丝体;再次为氯化苄法耗时3—4h,产量约3μg／g菌丝体。     

蜘蛛基因组DNA提取方法的比较

分别用SDS法,SK251基因组DNA小量抽提试剂盒法,自制试剂盒法,对蜘蛛组织的基因组DNA进行了提取,经比较,自制试剂盒法对提取蜘蛛基因组DNA最简便面又有效的方法。     

马蹄金基因组DNA的提取方法比较

对马蹄金基因组DNA的提取方法———快速提取法、小量提取法和大量提取法进行了对比分析,结果表明,利用快速提取法可在20 min内快速可靠地从马蹄金(Dichondra repensForst.)组织中提取DNA,与小量提取法和大量提取法获得的DNA用于PCR检测结果一致,可为转基因植物的快速检测提供方法。     

牛肉干中牛基因组DNA提取方法的比较研究

为得到一种快速、稳定、准确、优质的牛肉干DNA的提取方法,本研究比较了SDS法、改良CTAB法、酚-氯仿抽提法以及4种试剂盒提取法的提取效果。通过比较DNA的提取质量、提取效率,并对提取的DNA进行PCR扩增分析。DNA提取结果表明,7种提取方法均能从牛肉干中提取出DNA,其中采用SDS法、酚-氯仿法、试剂盒1法和试剂盒4法所提取的DNA质量较高,A260/A280比值在1.7~1.9之间。试剂盒3法提取所花的时间最少,DNA得率最高,但DNA的纯度最低。PCR扩增结果表明,7种方法所提取的DNA均能满足后续PCR扩增实验的要求。实验室可根据具体的实际情况选择使用DNA提取方法。     

一种通用的基因组DNA提取方法

目的:探讨一种通厢的基因组DNA提取方法.方法:采用改良的膜法分别从动植物组织、外周血、细菌、细胞等标本提取基因组DNA,DNA样品经紫外吸收、琼脂糖凝胶电泳、PCR扩增和酶切进行榆测.结果:该方法提取的基因组DNA纯度较高,电泳条带清晰,DNA质量能满足下游分子生物学研究的需要.结论:该方法简便快速、适用范围广,是提取基因组DNA的一种有效方法.     

一种快速提取丝状真菌染色体DNA的方法

介绍了一种适用于丝状真菌染色体DNA大片段的快速提取方法,该方法以(100mM Tris,100mM NaGl,50mM EDTA-Na2 2%SDS,pH值9.0)为提取液,经石英砂研磨破壁.应用该方法成功地提取了粗糙脉胞菌(Neurospora crassa)、米曲霉(Aspergillus oryzae)、产黄青霉(Penicillium chrysogenum)和头孢霉菌(Cep- halosporium sp.)等4种不同丝状真菌的染色体DNA大片段,且所提DNA片段均大于20kb,可直接用于限制性酶切、PCR等分子生物学研究.     

一种蜘蛛基因组DNA的简易提取方法

本文介绍了1种改进的蜘蛛基因组DNA的提取方法.通过与传统DNA提取方法的比较,本方法具有可在常温条件下进行、DNA得率高、简便、经济等优势.     

蚧虫基因组DNA不同提取方法的比较

实验以日本龟蜡蚧CeroplastesjaponicusGreen,白蜡绵粉蚧PhenacoccusfraxinusTang ,朝鲜球蚧DidesmococcuskoreanusBorchseniush和瘤大球坚蚧EulecaniumgiganteaShinji等 4种蚧虫为材料 ,分别用十二烷基硫酸钠 (SDS)法、十六烷基三乙基溴化铵 (CTAB)法、醋酸钾 (KAc)法和氯化钠 (NaCl)法等 4种方法 ,对单只蚧虫进行基因组DNA提取 ,用 0 8%琼脂糖凝胶电泳检测所提DNA。结果表明 ,4种方法都可以提取到基因组DNA ,但是比较而言 ,CTAB法和NaCl法所提取的DNA质量明显优于SDS法和KAc法 ,并适用于PCR。因此认为 ,CTAB法和NaCl法是实验室提取单只蚧虫基因组DNA更有效而实用的方法。     

木棉基因组DNA提取方法的比较研究

木棉组织细胞含有多酚类、糖类、萜类化合物和其他次生代谢物质,很难得到高质量的基因组DNA。为了获得高质量的木棉基因组DNA,本实验以两个不同地方采集的木棉成熟叶片为材料,采用CTAB法、SDS法、普通试剂盒、磁珠法试剂盒以及对以上4种方法进行改良后的4种方法,提取总的木棉DNA。通过微量紫外-分光光度计、琼脂糖电泳对所提取DNA的纯度、得率,毒害及耗时等方面进行了比较。结果表明:经改良后提取的DNA质量都有所提高,且改良的磁珠法试剂盒效果最佳,可直接用于下游分子生物学实验。     

一种适用于PCR反应的酵母菌、无绿藻及丝状真菌DNA提取方法

目的 介绍一种从酵母、无绿藻及丝状真菌中提取DNA以用于PCR反应的方法。方法 所用菌种包括临床分离的未知菌株和保藏菌株共23株：未知酵母菌（5株）、真皮毛孢子菌（1株）、糠秕马拉色菌（1株）、季也蒙念珠菌（5株）、未知丝状真菌（6株）、无绿藻（1株）、烟曲霉（2株）、拟青霉菌（1株）、茎点霉（1株）。用溶细胞酶（lyticase）结合Biospin真菌基因组DNA提取试剂盒提取基因组DNA,A260／A280检测纯度并计算质量浓度,用真菌通用引物ITS1／ITS4扩增真菌核糖体基因（rDNA）内转录间区ITS基因,经PCR扩增检验所提取的DNA质量。结果 成功提取所有23株真菌基因组DNA,其纯度及质量浓度能满足PCR反应的要求。结论 用溶细胞酶结合Biospin真菌基因组DNA提取试剂盒从酵母菌、无绿藻及丝状真菌提取的DNA可用于PCR反应。     

两种提取肠道微生物总DNA方法的比较

目的比较肠道微生物总DNA两种提取方法的优缺点。方法采用苯酚-氯仿抽提法和试剂盒法提取肠道微生物总DNA,比较其作为模板扩增细菌16S DNA的优缺点。结果两种方法提取的细菌DNA均能用于后续PCR扩增的模板。酚-氯仿抽提法经济可靠,但提取的DNA量及纯度较低试;剂盒法提取方便,操作简单,质量稳定,易标准化,但成本高。结论两种方法各具优缺点,应根据实验室条件和实验要求进行选择。     

Rapid and reliable DNA extraction techniques from trypan-blue-stained mycorrhizal roots: comparison of two methods

Two improved DNA extraction techniques from trypan-blue-stained root fragments were developed and compared for rapid and reliable analyses. In Method A, 1 cm trypan-blue-stained mycorrhizal root fragments were individually isolated, crushed by bead beating, and purified with Chelex-100 (Bio-Rad). In Method B, DNA extraction was carried out using an UltraClean microbial DNA isolation kit (MoBio Laboratories). DNA was extracted from the mycorrhizal roots of four plant species, quantified by UV absorbance, and PCR-amplified with primers specific to arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi. Although PCR inhibitors might still exist when using Method A, appropriate dilution and employment of nested-PCR overcame this problem. Method B removed PCR inhibitors, but sometimes, depending on the mycorrhizal colonization within the root fragments, it also required nested PCR. In conclusion, both methods enabled us to handle many samples in a short time. Method B provided greater reliability and Method A provided better cost performance. Both techniques can be useful for PCR-based applications to identify species and estimate species composition after measuring mycorrhizal colonization rate with trypan blue staining.     

新生隐球菌基因组DNA不同抽提方法的比较

目的 DNA是进行分子生物学研究的重要基础。在本研究中,我们建立了2种简单快速抽提基因组DNA的方法并可用作PCR扩增的模板。通过比较4种不同的DNA抽提方法以确定哪种更适合进行下一步的基因分析。方法这4种方法是:玻璃珠法,酶法,3%SDS法和氯化苄法。玻璃珠法是用玻璃珠在混漩器上剧烈振荡破碎细胞壁;3%SDS法是将细胞在含10mmol/LDTT的3%SDS溶液中加热,然后用5mmol/LKAc和异丙醇抽提,DNA的产量通过A260测定。结果 3%SDS溶解法、经典酶法、玻璃珠法和氯化苄法的DNA产量分别为0.4154±0.0367、0.8484±0.0756、1.2636±0.2040、0.4070±0.0339(g/L×108CFU/mL)。结论玻璃珠法是最敏感、重复性好、简单、费用合理的抽提方法 。     

DNA extraction and PCR amplification method suitable for fresh, herbarium-stored, lichenized, and other fungi

This paper presents a DNA extraction method suitable for fresh, herbarium-stored, lichenized and other fungal specimens. The method is fast and reliable, comparatively inexpensive and is suitable for obtaining PCR amplification quality DNA from large numbers of samples in a short time. The method has been tested with over 300 samples ofAscochyta, Phyllosticta, Ramalina, Parmelia andPhysconia. Amplifiable fungal DNA was extracted from pure cultures, leaf lesions, whole thalli and dissected only-fungal sections of lichenized fungi. In addition, the method has proved suitable for use with herbarium specimens of both lichenized and non-lichenized fungi, stored as dried pure cultures or dried infected plant material.     

苔藓植物DNA提取方法研究

提取高质量的 DNA是对苔藓植物遗传多样性进行研究的基础。该文以苔藓植物为试材 ,用 5种方法 ,即快速提取法、改良 CTAB法、CTAB法、SDS法及高盐法 (第一种为自行设计 ,第二种是对原有方法的改进 )对苔藓植物 DNA提取方法进行了比较研究。结果表明 ,快速提取法和改良 CTAB法是 2种适合于苔藓植物 DNA提取的方法。这 2种方法提取的 DNA浓度和纯度均比较高 ,凝胶电泳显示无明显降解现象 ,适宜作为 PCR扩增的模板 ,并成功地进行了 RAPD扩增。     

FTA-DNA直接提取法在病原真菌分子鉴定中的应用

目的建立并评价FTA-DNA直接提取法在病原真菌分子鉴定中的应用。方法采用whatman FTA-DNA直接提取法从25个不同种属的45株培养的菌株和6例临床标本中提取病原真菌DNA,用于病原真菌的测序鉴定。配制不同浓度的孢子悬液探索该方法的检测限和安全性。结果 45株菌株扩增后均能得到1条清晰的DNA扩增片段,并成功测序。应用该方法亦成功从腹水、胸水、口腔拭子、宫颈拭子来源的临床标本中直接提取DNA并成功鉴定病原真菌。该DNA提取方法联合降落PCR能检测到1.0×103个cell/mL的孢子悬液,1.0×104个cell/mL及以下浓度的孢子悬液可以被FTA卡完全灭活。结论 FTA-DNA直接提取法可快速有效地从培养的菌株及部分临床标本中提取并保存病原真菌DNA,用于病原真菌的测序鉴定。     

Improved methods for the preparation of high molecular weight DNA from large and small scale cultures of filamentous fungi

Improved methods are described for the isolation of pure, high molecular weight DNA from small and large scale cultures of filamentous fungi. The methods depend on the extraction of DNA under conditions which prevent nuclease activity and contamination by carbohydrate. The small scale method depends on enzymatic digestion of the wall whereas the large scale method uses partial damage followed by autolysis. High yields of DNA are obtained by both methods and the DNA is suitable for restriction analysis. Southern Blotting, RFLP analysis, dot blotting and the production of gene libraries. The small scale method can be used for the simultaneous analysis of multiple cultures.     

Comparing the performance of three ancient DNA extraction methods for high‐throughput sequencing

The DNA molecules that can be extracted from archaeological and palaeontological remains are often degraded and massively contaminated with environmental microbial material. This reduces the efficacy of shotgun approaches for sequencing ancient genomes, despite the decreasing sequencing costs of high‐throughput sequencing (HTS). Improving the recovery of endogenous molecules from the DNA extraction and purification steps could, thus, help advance the characterization of ancient genomes. Here, we apply the three most commonly used DNA extraction methods to five ancient bone samples spanning a ~30 thousand year temporal range and originating from a diversity of environments, from South America to Alaska. We show that methods based on the purification of DNA fragments using silica columns are more advantageous than in solution methods and increase not only the total amount of DNA molecules retrieved but also the relative importance of endogenous DNA fragments and their molecular diversity. Therefore, these methods provide a cost‐effective solution for downstream applications, including DNA sequencing on HTS platforms.