Discriminative and aversive properties of beta-carboline-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester, a benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonist, in rhesus monkeys

Rhesus monkeys were trained to discriminate injections of saline from those of beta-carboline-3-carboxylic acid ethyl ester (beta-CCE), a compound that binds to the benzodiazepine receptor, but often has actions opposite to those of the benzodiazepines. A benzodiazepine agonist midazolam and low doses of a specific benzodiazepine antagonist, Ro 15-1788, reversed the discriminative effects of beta-CCE. Higher doses of Ro 15-1788 produced stimulus effects similar to beta-CCE. In a separate experiment, monkeys responded to terminate intravenous infusions of beta-CCE, but not midazolam. This aversive effect of beta-CCE was reversed by Ro 15-1788. The behavioral effects of beta-CCE in these non-human primates are consistent with other data that have shown it to act on benzodiazepine receptors, and support the hypothesis that beta-CCE can be considered an inverse agonist at this receptor.     

Benzodiazepine Enhancement of γ-Aminobutyric Acid-Mediated Chloride Ion Flux in Rat Brain Synaptoneurosomes

Benzodiazepine agonists such as Ro 11-6896 [B10(+)], diazepam, clonazepam, and flurazepam were found to enhance muscimol-stimulated 36Cl- uptake into rat cerebral cortical synaptoneurosomes. The rank order of potentiation was B10(+) greater than diazepam greater than clonazepam greater than flurazepam. These benzodiazepines had no effect on 36Cl-uptake in the absence of muscimol. Further, the inactive enantiomer, Ro 11-6893 [B10(-)], and the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor ligand Ro 5-4864 did not potentiate muscimol-stimulated 36Cl- uptake at concentrations up to 10 microM. In contrast, the benzodiazepine receptor inverse agonists ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate and 6,7-dimethoxy-4-ethyl-beta- carboline-3-carboxylic acid methyl ester inhibited muscimol stimulated 36Cl- uptake. Benzodiazepines and beta-carbolines altered the apparent K0.5 of muscimol-stimulated 36Cl- uptake, without affecting the Vmax. The effects of both benzodiazepine receptor agonists and inverse agonists were reversed by the benzodiazepine antagonists Ro 15-1788 and CGS-8216. These data further confirm that central benzodiazepine receptors modulate the capacity of gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor agonists to enhance chloride transport and provide a biochemical technique for studying benzodiazepine receptor function in vitro.     

Effects of benzodiazepines on single unit activity in the substantia nigra pars reticulata

Intravenous administration of two benzodiazepines, flurazepam and diazepam, had an inhibitory effect on the firing rates of neurons of the substantia nigra pars reticulata, a brain region with an identified GABAergic innervation. Diazepam was more potent than flurazepam. Bicuculline and picrotoxin, two drugs which block GABAergic transmission, and caffeine and theophylline, two methylxanthines which inhibit benzodiazepine binding, all reversed the inhibition produced by diazepam. The action of theophylline was less consistent than that of caffeine. Similarly, Ro 15–1788, an imidazodiazepine which putatively functions as a specific benzodiazepine antagonist, reversed the diazepam-induced inhibition. These findings are consistent with previous reports which suggest that the benzodiazepines may act through a GABAergic mechanism. In a separate group of experiments, caffeine or Ro 15–1788 was administered alone. While caffeine excited all reticulata cells tested. Ro 15–1788, the more specific benzodiazepine antagonist, generally had little excitatory effect. These results suggest: 1) that cells of the substantia nigra pars reticulata may not receive a substantial, tonic inhibition mediated by an endogenous benzodiazepine-like substance; and 2) that the methylxanthines may increase reticulata cell firing, at least in part, through mechanisms unrelated to the blockade of benzodiazepine receptors.     

Benzodiazepines and synaptic processing in the spatial domain within the cat's primary somatosensory cortex

In the primary somatosensory cortex of cats, the size of the receptive fields (RFs) of cutaneously responsive neurones is under the control of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) mediated inhibition when the cells are situated in rapidly adapting (RA) background regions. Cells located in slowly adapting (SA) or low-velocity rapidly adapting (LVRA) background regions do not appear to be affected by GABA significantly in the spatial domain, although other response properties such as threshold and firing pattern are under the influence of bicuculline methiodide (BMI) sensitive processes. The GABA receptor is one component of the oligomeric complex that includes the benzodiazepine (Bzd) binding site, the barbiturate recognition site, and the Cl- ionophore. Owing to current debates about the possible existence of endogenous ligands of Bzd receptors, we have examined whether Bzd agonists, in addition to GABA and BMI, have RF-modulating actions on RA S1 neurones and have assessed the effectiveness of the Bzd antagonist, Ro 15-1788, in this experimental paradigm. Ro 15-1788 is an imidazobenzodiazepine that acts as a specific competitive antagonist of Bzds by exerting high-affinity interactions with that Bzd receptor through which anticonvulsant effects of flurazepam (flu) and diazepam are expressed. This has been shown previously in neurochemical, behavioral, neurological, and pharmacological studies. Ro 15-1788 has little or no affinity for nonneuronal binding sites in the CNS. Ro 15-1788 binding does not displace GABA from its own binding site but does compete for all major Bzd ligands that act as pharmacological agonists and inverse agonists of the Bzd receptor through which anticonvulsant and convulsant effects are expressed. Bzd agonists elevated the threshold for somatic activation, depressed spontaneous activity, and decreased RF size. One exception in this regard was midazolam, which sometimes decreased somatic thresholds and increased spontaneous discharges. These latter effects were reversed at higher doses of the agonist. BMI returned RFs to control sizes when the drug was administered concurrently with Bzd agonists, or it caused RFs to assume greater than normal sizes, depending on the strength of current ejecting the antagonist. Ro 15-1788 given alone decreased response thresholds, increased spontaneous firing, and sometimes enlarged RFs. This antagonist also reversed the RF size-decreasing action of flu, diazepam, and midazolam. Quantitative analyses of air-puffer responses evoked from low-threshold, S1 cells revealed that Bzds do not selectively attenuate spatial summation, but that they act preferentially in the surround, or in the peripheral, regions of cutaneous excitatory RFs.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Behavioral effects and benzodiazepine antagonist activity of Ro 15-1788 (flumazepil) in pigeons

The selective benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, Ro 15-1788, produced behavioral effects in pigeons at doses at least 100 times lower than those previously reported to possess intrinsic pharmacological activity in mammals. In contrast to its effects in mammalian species, in pigeons, Ro 15-1788 does not exhibit partial agonist activity. Key-peck responses of pigeons were studied under a multiple fixed-interval 3-min, fixed-interval 3-min schedule in which the first response after 3-min produced food in the presence of red or white keylights. In addition, every 30th response during the red keylight produced a brief electric shock (punishment). Under control conditions, punished responding was suppressed to 30% of unpunished response levels. Ro 15-1788 (0.01 mg/kg, i.m.) increased unpunished response rates by 33% without affecting rates of punished responding. Doses of 0.1 to 1.0 mg/kg Ro 15-1788 produced dose-related decreases in both punished and unpunished responding. As is characteristic of other benzodiazepines, midazolam (0.1 and 0.3 mg/kg, i.m.) markedly increased punished responding but had little effect on rates of unpunished responding. Ro 15-1788 antagonized the increases in punished responding and also reversed the rate-decreasing effects of higher doses of midazolam. However, the effectiveness of Ro 15-1788 as a benzodiazepine antagonist was limited by its intrinsic activity: rate-decreasing doses of Ro 15-1788 were unable to completely reverse behavioral effects of midazolam. Midazolam was an effective antagonist of the behavioral effects of Ro 15-1788 (up to 0.1 mg/kg) but midazolam did not influence the rate-decreasing effects of 1.0 mg/kg Ro 15-1788 across a 100-fold dose range. In the pigeon, the behavioral effects of relatively low doses of Ro 15-1788 (0.01-0.1 mg/kg) appear to be related to benzodiazepine receptor mechanisms, whereas other systems appear to be involved in the effects of higher doses.     

Behavioural actions of Ro 5-4864: A peripheral-type benzodiazepine?

Ro 5-4864 is a 1,4 benzodiazepine lacking typical benzodiazepine behavioural actions, and which has very low affinity for the “classical” CNS benzodiazepine binding sites. However, Ro 5-4864 has very high affinity for the peripheral type of binding site in the periphery and in the brain. Evidence is reviewed that Ro 5-4864 is sedative, convulsant and anxiogenic in rodents. We also describe the effects of combining Ro 5-4864 treatment with benzodiazepines (e.g. diazepam, chlordiazepoxide) and with other drugs that modify the activity of benzodiazepines (Ro 15-1788, CGS 8216, picrotoxin, PK 11195, phenytoin). The binding sites that might be mediating these behavioural actions of Ro 5-4864 are discussed.     

Benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788: binding characteristics and interaction with drug-induced changes in dopamine turnover and cerebellar cGMP levels

The recently discovered benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 was characterized in binding studies, and its potency and selectivity were determined in vivo by interaction with drug-induced changes in dopamine turnover and cerebellar cGMP level. Ro 15-1788 reduced [3H]flunitrazepam binding in the brain in vivo with a potency similar to that of diazepam and effectively inhibited [3H]diazepam binding in vitro (IC50 = 2.3 +/- 0.6 nmol/liter). [3H]Ro 15-1788 bound to tissue fractions of rat cerebral cortex with an apparent dissociation (KD) of 1.0 +/- 0.1 nmol/liter. The in vitro potency of various benzodiazepines in displacing [3H]Ro 15-1788 from its binding site was of the same rank order as found previously in [3H]diazepam binding. Autoradiograms of [3H]Ro 15-1788 binding in sections of rat cerebellum showed the same distribution of radioactivity as with [3H]flunitrazepam. The attenuating effect of diazepam on the chlorpromazine- or stress-induced elevation of homovanillic acid in rat brain was antagonized by Ro 15-1788. Among a series of compounds which either decreased or increased the rat cerebellar cGMP level, only the effect of benzodiazepine receptor ligands (diazepam, zopiclone, CL 218 872) was antagonized by Ro 15-1788. Thus, Ro 15-1788 is a selective benzodiazepine antagonist acting at the level of the benzodiazepine receptor in the central nervous system. Peripheral benzodiazepine binding sites in kidney and schistosomes were not affected by Ro 15-1788.     

Subcellular Localization of "Peripheral-Type" Binding Sites for Benzodiazepines in Rat Brain

The binding of [3H]Ro 5-4864, a specific ligand for "peripheral-type" benzodiazepine binding sites and [3H]Ro 15-1788, a specific ligand for the central benzodiazepine receptors, was determined in subcellular fractions of rat brain. As previously reported, the highest levels of "peripheral-type" benzodiazepine binding sites and benzodiazepine receptors were found in the crude P1 and P2 fractions, respectively. Purification of these crude fractions revealed that high levels of both [3H]Ro 5-4864 and [3H]Ro 15-1788 binding were present in the mitochondrial and synaptosomal fractions. In contrast, the purified nuclei and myelin contained low levels of both [3H]Ro 5-4864 and [3H]Ro 15-1788 binding.     

Benzodiazepine Antagonist Ro 15–1788: Binding Characteristics and Interaction with Drug-Induced Changes in Dopamine Turnover and Cerebellar cGMP Levels

Abstract: The recently discovered benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 was characterized in binding studies, and its potency and selectivity were determined in vivo by interaction with drug-induced changes in dopamine turnover and cerebellar cGMP level. Ro 15-1788 reduced [³H]flunitrazepam binding in the brain in vivo with a potency similar to that of diazepam and effectively inhibited [³H]diazepam binding in vitro (IC₅₀= 2.3 ± 0.6 nmol/liter). [³H]Ro 15-1788 bound to tissue fractions of rat cerebral cortex with an apparent dissociation constant ( K _D) of 1.0 ± 0.1 nmol/liter. The in vitro potency of various benzodiazepines in displacing [³H]Ro 15-1788 from its binding site was of the same rank order as found previously in [³H]diazepam binding. Autoradiograms of [³H]Ro 15-1788 binding in sections of rat cerebellum showed the same distribution of radioactivity as with [³H]flunitrazepam. The attenuating effect of diazepam on the chlorpromazine- or stress-induced elevation of homovanillic acid in rat brain was antagonized by Ro 15-1788. Among a series of compounds which either decreased or increased the rat cerebellar cGMP level, only the effect of benzodiazepine receptor ligands (diazepam, zopiclone, CL 218 872) was antagonized by Ro 15-1788. Thus, Ro 15-1788 is a selective benzodiazepine antagonist acting at the level of the benzodiazepine receptor in the central nervous system. Peripheral benzodiazepine binding sites in kidney and schistosomes were not affected by Ro 15-1788.     

Diazepam increases membrane fluidity of rat hippocampus synaptosomes

Diazepam in vitro produced a concentration-dependent increase of membrane fluidity in crude synaptic membranes from rat hippocampus, but not cerebellum. Similar effects were obtained with higher concentrations of Ro 15-1788 and PK 11195, while zopiclone was completely inactive. In vivo acute treatment with diazepam and Ro 15-1788 gave results similar to those in vitro. The specific benzodiazepine antagonist also significantly increased membrane fluidity and was not able to reverse diazepam's effect. The data are discussed in terms of a possible role of protein kinase inhibition by the drugs not mediated by the 'central' or 'peripheral' type of benzodiazepine receptors.     

Ro 15-1788 antagonizes the discriminative stimulus effects of diazepam in rats but not similar effects of pentobarbital

The benzodiazepine antagonist properties of Ro 15-1788 were evaluated in rats trained to discriminate between saline and either 1.0 mg/kg of diazepam or 10 mg/kg of pentobarbital in a two-choice discrete-trial shock avoidance procedure. When administered alone, 1.0 mg/kg of diazepam and 10 mg/kg of pentobarbital produced comparable amounts of drug-appropriate responding (> 84%), whether rats were trained to discriminate between diazepam or pentobarbital and saline. Ro 15-1788 (3–32 mg/kg, p.o.), administered 10 min before diazepam or pentobarbital, produced a dose-related blockade of the discriminative effects of diazepam in both groups of rats, but was completely ineffective in blocking the discriminative effects of pentobarbital. The dose-effect curve for the discriminative effects of diazepam was shifted to the right in a parallel fashion 3- and 13-fold by 10 and 32 mg/kg of Ro 15-1788, respectively, indicating that Ro 15-1788 acts as a surmountable, competitive antagonist of diazepam. When administered alone, Ro 15-1788 (32–100 mg/kg, p.o.) produced primarily saline-appropriate responding, although 100 mg/kg of Ro 15-1788 produced drug-appropriate responding in one out of eight rats. When administered orally 30 min after diazepam, Ro 15-1788 (32 mg/kg) completely reversed within 10 min the discriminative effects of diazepam. The blockade of diazepam's discriminative effects by 32 mg/kg of Ro 15-1788 appeared to last at least as long (approximately 2 hr) as the effects of diazepam alone.     

Effects of Guanyl Nucleotides on [3H]Flunitrazepam Binding to Rat Hippocampal Synaptic Membranes: Equilibrium Binding and Dissociation Kinetics

The effects of guanyl nucleotides on the binding of [3H]flunitrazepam to rat hippocampal synaptic membranes were studied. In equilibrium binding studies, gamma-amino-n-butyric acid (GABA) increased and GTP decreased the binding affinity of [3H]flunitrazepam; GTP also caused a decrease in binding capacity. The effect, however, is variable. In studies of the dissociation kinetics of [3H]flunitrazepam using diazepam and the antagonist Ro 15-1788 as the displacers, there was evidence of two dissociation rate constants. GTP increased both the fast- and slow-dissociation rate constants and increased the ratio of the slow-dissociation binding state. The effect of GTP was mimicked by its nonhydrolyzable analogue 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate but not by ATP and occurred when diazepam, but not when Ro 15-1788, was used as the displacer. GABA antagonized the effect of GTP on the dissociation of [3H]flunitrazepam. The nature of the benzodiazepine receptor, its actions, and the possible role of cyclic AMP as a second messenger are discussed.     

CGS 8216, Ro 15-1788 and methyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate, but not EMD 41717 antagonize the muscle relaxant effect of diazepam in genetically spastic rats

Diazepam (0.4-4 mg/kg i.p.) reduced the spontaneous tonic activity in the electromyogram (EMG) recorded from the gastrocnemius-soleus muscle of spastic mutant Han-Wistar rats in a dose-dependent manner. The muscle relaxant effect of diazepam was antagonized by the benzodiazepine antagonists Ro 15-1788 (5 mg/kg i.p.), beta-CCM (2 mg/kg i.p.) and CGS 8216 (5 mg/kg i.p.), but not by EMD 41717 (50 mg/kg i.p.). These results add further support to the hypothesis that Ro 15-1788, CGS 8216 and beta-CCM do antagonize all pharmacological effects of benzodiazepines while EMD 41717 displays more selectivity in antagonizing the different actions of benzodiazepines.     

The role of benzodiazepine receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol

Twenty male Sprague-Dawley rats were trained to discriminate 3.0 mg/kg delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) from its vehicle. Following acquisition of this discrimination animals were tested for generalization to 3.0 mg/kg diazepam. Thirteen animals showed a generalization from THC to diazepam, whereas the remaining seven animals did not. The generalization curve for diazepam was dose-dependent from 0.1 to 10.0 mg/kg in the first group; the latter group showed no generalization from THC at any dose of diazepam in this range. No differences were found between these groups in the generalization curve for THC. The benzodiazepine antagonist Ro 15-1788 (2.0 mg/kg) antagonized the generalization to diazepam in the group that discriminated diazepam as THC. In contrast, Ro 15-1788 increased THC lever responding of 10 mg/kg diazepam in the group which did not generalize from THC. Ro 15-1788 did not alter the discriminability of THC in either group. THC also showed partial generalization to pentobarbital (1 to 10 mg/kg). The generalization was again complete in one subgroup and absent in another, but there was only a 43 percent overlap between the subgroups found with testing for generalization to diazepam. The percent THC lever responding with 3.0 mg/kg pentobarbital was increased by Ro 15-1788 in the group which generalized to diazepam, but not the other group. These data suggest that the discriminative stimulus properties of THC may have some commonality with the effects of diazepam in a subpopulation of rats trained to discriminate THC. These THC-like effects of diazepam are probably mediated by benzodiazepine receptors since they are antagonized by a specific benzodiazepine receptor antagonist.     

Reversal of the antinociceptive effects of centrally-administered morphine by the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788

The effects of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, Ro 15-1788, were examined on analgesia induced by morphine after central (intracerebroventricular, i.c.v., or intrathecal, i.t.) and systemic administration. Analgesia was assessed in squirrel monkeys trained to respond under an electric shock tiltration procedure and in mice using the radiant heat tail-flick test. Central and systemic administration of morphine produced antinociceptive effects that were antagonized by 0.1 mg/kg of naloxone in both species. Ro 15-1788 antagonized the effects of morphine after central (i.c.v. or i.t.) administration but did not alter the effects of morphine given by the systemic route. This novel interaction suggests that Ro 15-1788 may be useful in pharmacologically separating neural substrates subserving opiate analgesia.     

Mechanism of the tranquilizing action of electron structural analogs of nicotinamide

The interaction of nicotinamide and its electron structural analogs (NMF and AzN compounds) with central benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788 and GABA-ergic system antagonist bicuculline were studied in a conflicting situation test. NMF and AzN behaved as the agonists of GABA-benzodiazepine receptor complex. Like in diazepam, the anxiolytic effects of benzodiazepines and nicotinamide was prevented by bicuculline and Ro 15-1788. The given compounds were shown to be more active, than nicotinamide.     

Audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice discriminate sensitively between low efficacy benzodiazepine receptor agonists and inverse agonists

In experiments with audiogenic seizures in DBA/2 mice, we observed that several socalled benzodiazepine receptor antagonists exhibited either anticonvulsive (Ro 15-1788, PrCC) or proconvulsive (FG 7142, beta-CCE, CGS 8216) effects at high receptor occupancy (17-85%), as compared to benzodiazepines and DMCM which had anticonvulsive and proconvulsive actions, respectively, at very low receptor occupancy (less than 10%). Sensitive distinction between benzodiazepine receptor ligands with low anticonvulsive efficacy (partial agonists) and ligands with low proconvulsive, and maybe anxiogenic, efficacy (partial inverse agonists) can thus be obtained in sound seizure susceptible mice.     

Antagonism of RO 15-1788 with benzodiazepines in the effect on motivated aggression and the action of analgesics

The influence of Ro 15-1788 and bicuculline on the action of GABA-positive drugs (muscimol), GABA cethyl ester, piracetam and depakine and benzodiazepine tranquilizers (diazepam, phenazepam) on motivated aggression has been studied. It has been shown that Ro 15-1788 which has a weak antiaggressive effect selectively antagonizes the anti-aggressive effect of tranquilizers but not that of GABA-positive drugs. Bicuculline antagonizes antiaggressive activity of the drugs of both types. The action of these antagonists on the effect of the drugs under study as regards the analgetic activity of morphine was also studied. It has been shown that Ro 15-1788 antagonizes the potentiation of morphine analgesia caused by diazepam. At the same time Ro 15-1788 does not influence morphine analgesia potentiated by muscimol. Bicuculline removes the potentiation of morphine analgesia caused both by diazepam and muscimol it is concluded that bicuculline-sensitive GABA receptors modulate the antiaggressive effect of benzodiazepines and their influence on the analgetic action of opiates.     

Convulsant component of a depressant benzodiazepine

The convulsant influence of high doses of diazepam, in the presence of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788, was studied in rats. Animals were implanted with permanent cortical screw electrodes for EEG recording. EEG spiking and accompanying clonic activity was observed in rats receiving greater than or equal to 200 mg/kg diazepam, followed 10 minutes later by Ro 15-1788 (20 mg/kg). Pentylenetetrazole and picrotoxin seizure thresholds, measured during constant rate iv infusion, were significantly lowered by pretreatment with diazepam (250 mg/kg) and Ro 15-1788 (20 mg/kg) administered 30 and 20 minutes, respectively, before seizure threshold measurement. It is proposed that this convulsive activity of diazepam is mediated through the picrotoxinin receptor.     

Interactions between the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-1788 (flumazepil) and the inverse agonist beta-CCE: behavioral studies with squirrel monkeys

The effects of Ro 15-1788 and ethyl-beta-carboline-3-carboxylate (beta-CCE) were studied alone and in combination on the behavioral performances of squirrel monkeys. Under one procedure, performances maintained by food were suppressed by electric shock presentation (punishment or "conflict" procedure). Under a second procedure, responding was maintained either by food or electric shock delivery under a 5-min fixed-interval schedule. Doses of beta-CCE between 0.1 and 3.0 mg/kg, i.m., produced graded decreases in punished responding which were reversed by pretreatment with Ro 15-1788 (1.0 - 10.0 mg/kg, i.m.). Low doses of beta-CCE (0.03 - 0.3 mg/kg, i.m.) increased responding of monkeys maintained by shock presentation, but did not affect food-maintained responding; higher doses of beta-CCE decreased responding under both schedules. These effects of beta-CCE are opposite those produced by the benzodiazepines under this procedure. Ro 15-1788 (1.0 mg/kg i.m.) antagonized the effects of beta-CCE, producing a shift to the right in the dose-response curves. These findings provide further support for the view that beta-CCE and Ro 15-1788 produce effects mediated by the same benzodiazepine receptor recognition site.